breakwater stability with damaged single layer armour units rover et al

2
BREAKWATER BREAKWATER BREAKWATER BREAKWATERSTABILITYWITHDAMAGEDSINGLELAYERARMOURUNITS STABILITYWITHDAMAGEDSINGLELAYERARMOURUNITS STABILITYWITHDAMAGEDSINGLELAYERARMOURUNITS STABILITYWITHDAMAGEDSINGLELAYERARMOURUNITS  RicharddeRover,DeltaMarineConsultants, [email protected] HenkJanVerhagen,DelftUniversityofTechnology, [email protected] ArnoudvandenBerge,DeltaMarineConsultants, [email protected] BasReedijk,DeltaMarineConsultants, [email protected]  INTRODUCTION AtbreakwaterandseawallprojectsatPortStFrancisand Scarb orough break age of singl e layer armou r units was observed.Itisgenerallyassumedthatbreakageofsingle layerarmourunitshasasignificantnegativeeffectonthe hyd raulic st abi lit y of a rubble mou nd breakwater. The significantdecreaseofinterlockingcapacityandmassof the broken units woul d lead to di splacement of these unit s and surroundi ng unit s. The broken parts of the damaged unit s woul d act li ke pr oje ct ile s. The waves wou ld “throw the se bro ken parts bac k and for th tothe armour layer. Mor e armour uni tsmay breakdue to the imp act of these broken parts leading to rapid damage progressionofthearmourlayerandfinallytofailureofthe total cons truc tion. This damag e behav iour has howev er neverbeenconfirmed. OBJECTIVE The mai n obj ect ive ofthisresearch isto det ermine the ef fe ct of si ng le l ayer ar mo ur u ni t br ea kag e on the hydr aulic ar mour layer st abili ty and potent ial damage progression. PHYSICALMODEL A 2-dime nsi onal mod el of a rub ble mou nd bre akwater withatypicalcrosssectionistestedinawaveflumeat DelftUniversityofTechnology.Thearmourlayerconsists ofmodelXblocarmourunitswithanominaldiameterD n of2.77cmandadesignwaveheightH dof10cm.  Figure1clusterofbrokenXblocarmourunits(inred) Fromeverymodel Xbloc unitthat simul atesa dama ged unitonenoseorlegiscutoff.Thedetachednoseorlegis gl ued back on the unit wi th a sugar/ water soluti on to pl ace the unit s in the armour layer. When exposed to water the sugar dis sol ves again simulating the broken unitsinrealityascloseaspossible. TESTINGSET-UP IrregularwaveswithaJonswap-spectrumareusedduring thetestseries. Thewaveheightisinc reasedfrom80%up till 190% ofthedesig n wav e hei ght ata con st ant wat er depthof0.55mandawavesteepnessof0.045.Different configurationswithbrokenunitsaretested.0%,7.5%or 15%oftheunitsaroundstillwaterleveloveraheightof 2Hdarebroken.Thedamagedunitsareplacedinclusters of 5 un it s or indi vi du al . Th ei r po si ti on is va ri ed wi th respecttothestillwaterline. EXPERIMENTALRESULTS For al l te st series wi th broken units st ar t of da ma ge occurred at signi fican t lower wave height s comp ared to an armour lay er wit h no broken uni ts. However fai lur e occurredatapproximatelythesamewaveheightsasfor an armour layer wi th no br oken unit s. Increasi ng the percentageofbrokenunitsornumberofbrokenunitsina clusterhadonlyaminoradditionalnegativeeffectonstart ofdamageandfailure.Thepositionofthedamagedunits around the sti ll water line over aheight of2Hdgaveno di ff er ence in infl uence of the br oken unit s on star t of damageandfailure.Themajorityofthedetachednoses andlegsshowedlittle to nomovementandstay edinthe armour layeror even tend todigthemselvesin the fir st underlayer. CONCLUSIONS                                                                                                    Figure2generaldamagebehaviourfordifferenttypesof armourlayer The da mage prog ression of an armour layer with damaged units is long and gr ad ual co mpar ed to th e damageprogressionofanarmourlayerwithnodamaged armourunits.Thistypeofdamageprogressionlookslike thedamag eprogres sionofanarmourlayercon sist ingof rip-raprock. Onlyafewbrokennoses and legsshoweddisplac ement during the tes t series. Itis the ref ore unlikelythatunder influenc e of th e wave s th e brok en parts wi ll ac t as projectilesdamagingotherunits.

Upload: parka-gustama-aji

Post on 05-Mar-2016

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Breakwater Stability With Damaged Single Layer Armour Units Rover Et Al

TRANSCRIPT

7212019 Breakwater Stability With Damaged Single Layer Armour Units Rover Et Al

httpslidepdfcomreaderfullbreakwater-stability-with-damaged-single-layer-armour-units-rover-et-al 11

BREAKWATERBREAKWATERBREAKWATERBREAKWATERSTABILITYWITHDAMAGEDSINGLELAYERARMOURUNITSSTABILITYWITHDAMAGEDSINGLELAYERARMOURUNITSSTABILITYWITHDAMAGEDSINGLELAYERARMOURUNITSSTABILITYWITHDAMAGEDSINGLELAYERARMOURUNITS

RicharddeRoverDeltaMarineConsultantsrderoverdmcnlHenkJanVerhagenDelftUniversityofTechnologyhjverhagentudelftnlArnoudvandenBergeDeltaMarineConsultantsavandenbergedmcnl

BasReedijkDeltaMarineConsultantsbreedijkdmcnl

INTRODUCTIONAtbreakwaterandseawallprojectsatPortStFrancisandScarborough breakageofsingle layer armour unitswasobservedItisgenerallyassumedthatbreakageofsinglelayerarmourunitshasasignificantnegativeeffectonthehydraulic stability of a rubble mound breakwater Thesignificantdecreaseofinterlockingcapacityandmassofthe broken units would lead to displacement of theseunits and surrounding units The broken parts of thedamaged units would act like projectiles The waveswould ldquothrowrdquo thesebroken partsback and forth tothearmour layer More armour unitsmay breakdue to theimpact of these broken parts leading to rapid damageprogressionofthearmourlayerandfinallytofailureofthe

total construction Thisdamage behaviourhashoweverneverbeenconfirmedOBJECTIVEThemain objective ofthisresearch isto determine theeffect of single layer armour unit breakage on thehydraulic armour layer stability and potential damageprogressionPHYSICALMODELA 2-dimensional model of a rubble mound breakwaterwithatypicalcrosssectionistestedinawaveflumeatDelftUniversityofTechnologyThearmourlayerconsistsofmodelXblocarmourunitswithanominaldiameterDnof277cmandadesignwaveheightHdof10cm

Figure1ndashclusterofbrokenXblocarmourunits(inred)FromeverymodelXbloc unitthatsimulatesa damaged

unitonenoseorlegiscutoffThedetachednoseorlegisglued back on the unit with a sugarwater solution toplace the units in the armour layer When exposed towater the sugar dissolves again simulating the brokenunitsinrealityascloseaspossibleTESTINGSET-UPIrregularwaveswithaJonswap-spectrumareusedduringthetestseriesThewaveheightisincreasedfrom80uptill 190ofthedesignwaveheight ata constant waterdepthof055mandawavesteepnessof0045Different

configurationswithbrokenunitsaretested075or15oftheunitsaroundstillwaterleveloveraheightof2HdarebrokenThedamagedunitsareplacedinclustersof 5 units or individual Their position is varied withrespecttothestillwaterlineEXPERIMENTALRESULTSFor all test series with broken units start of damageoccurredat significant lowerwave heights compared toan armour layer with no broken units However failureoccurredatapproximatelythesamewaveheightsasforan armour layer with no broken units Increasing thepercentageofbrokenunitsornumberofbrokenunitsinaclusterhadonlyaminoradditionalnegativeeffectonstart

ofdamageandfailureThepositionofthedamagedunitsaround the stillwater line overaheight of2Hdgavenodifference in influence of the broken units on start ofdamageandfailureThemajorityofthedetachednosesandlegsshowedlittletonomovementandstayedinthearmour layeror even tend todigthemselvesin the firstunderlayerCONCLUSIONS

983108983137983149983137983143983141 983152983154983151983143983154983141983155983155983145983151983150 983142983151983154 983140983145983142983142983141983154983141983150983156 983137983154983149983151983157983154 983148983137983161983141983154983155

983092 983091983090 983089

983155983156983137983154983156 983151983142 983140983137983149983137983143983141

983142983137983145983148983157983154983141

983112983155983087983112983140

983118 983157 983149 983138 983141 983154 983151 983142 983140 983145 983155 983152 983148 983137 983139 983141 983140 983137

983154 983149 983151 983157 983154 983157 983150 983145 983156 983155

983089 983140983137983149983137983143983141 983152983154983151983143983154983141983155983155983145983151 983150 983137983154983149983151983157983154 983148983137983161983141983154 983159983145983156983144 983128983138983148983151983139 983157983150983145983156983155983090 983141983160983152983141983139 983156983141983140 983140983137983149983137983143983141 983152983154983151983143983154983141 983155983155983145983151983150 983137983154983149983151983157983154 983148983137983161983141983154 983159983145983156983144 983140983137983149983137983143983141983140 983128983138983148983151983139 983157983150983145983156983155983091 983149983141983137983155983157983154983141983140 983140983137983149983137983143983141 983152983154983151983143983154983141983155983155983145983151 983150 983137983154983149983151983157983154 983148983137983161983141983154 983159983145983156983144 983140983137983149983137983143983141983140 983128983138983148983151983139 983157983150983145983156983155983092 983140983137983149983137983143983141 983152983154983151983143983154983141983155983155983145983151 983150 983137983154983149983151983157983154 983148983137983161983141983154 983159983145983156983144 983154983145983152983085983154983137983152 983154983151983139 983147

Figure2ndashgeneraldamagebehaviourfordifferenttypesofarmourlayer

The damage progression of an armour layer withdamaged units is long and gradual compared to thedamageprogressionofanarmourlayerwithnodamagedarmourunitsThistypeofdamageprogressionlookslikethedamageprogressionofanarmourlayerconsistingofrip-raprockOnlyafewbrokennosesand legsshoweddisplacementduring the test series Itis therefore unlikelythatunderinfluence of the waves the broken parts will act asprojectilesdamagingotherunits