breakwater stability with damaged single layer armour units rover et al
DESCRIPTION
Breakwater Stability With Damaged Single Layer Armour Units Rover Et AlTRANSCRIPT
7212019 Breakwater Stability With Damaged Single Layer Armour Units Rover Et Al
httpslidepdfcomreaderfullbreakwater-stability-with-damaged-single-layer-armour-units-rover-et-al 11
BREAKWATERBREAKWATERBREAKWATERBREAKWATERSTABILITYWITHDAMAGEDSINGLELAYERARMOURUNITSSTABILITYWITHDAMAGEDSINGLELAYERARMOURUNITSSTABILITYWITHDAMAGEDSINGLELAYERARMOURUNITSSTABILITYWITHDAMAGEDSINGLELAYERARMOURUNITS
RicharddeRoverDeltaMarineConsultantsrderoverdmcnlHenkJanVerhagenDelftUniversityofTechnologyhjverhagentudelftnlArnoudvandenBergeDeltaMarineConsultantsavandenbergedmcnl
BasReedijkDeltaMarineConsultantsbreedijkdmcnl
INTRODUCTIONAtbreakwaterandseawallprojectsatPortStFrancisandScarborough breakageofsingle layer armour unitswasobservedItisgenerallyassumedthatbreakageofsinglelayerarmourunitshasasignificantnegativeeffectonthehydraulic stability of a rubble mound breakwater Thesignificantdecreaseofinterlockingcapacityandmassofthe broken units would lead to displacement of theseunits and surrounding units The broken parts of thedamaged units would act like projectiles The waveswould ldquothrowrdquo thesebroken partsback and forth tothearmour layer More armour unitsmay breakdue to theimpact of these broken parts leading to rapid damageprogressionofthearmourlayerandfinallytofailureofthe
total construction Thisdamage behaviourhashoweverneverbeenconfirmedOBJECTIVEThemain objective ofthisresearch isto determine theeffect of single layer armour unit breakage on thehydraulic armour layer stability and potential damageprogressionPHYSICALMODELA 2-dimensional model of a rubble mound breakwaterwithatypicalcrosssectionistestedinawaveflumeatDelftUniversityofTechnologyThearmourlayerconsistsofmodelXblocarmourunitswithanominaldiameterDnof277cmandadesignwaveheightHdof10cm
Figure1ndashclusterofbrokenXblocarmourunits(inred)FromeverymodelXbloc unitthatsimulatesa damaged
unitonenoseorlegiscutoffThedetachednoseorlegisglued back on the unit with a sugarwater solution toplace the units in the armour layer When exposed towater the sugar dissolves again simulating the brokenunitsinrealityascloseaspossibleTESTINGSET-UPIrregularwaveswithaJonswap-spectrumareusedduringthetestseriesThewaveheightisincreasedfrom80uptill 190ofthedesignwaveheight ata constant waterdepthof055mandawavesteepnessof0045Different
configurationswithbrokenunitsaretested075or15oftheunitsaroundstillwaterleveloveraheightof2HdarebrokenThedamagedunitsareplacedinclustersof 5 units or individual Their position is varied withrespecttothestillwaterlineEXPERIMENTALRESULTSFor all test series with broken units start of damageoccurredat significant lowerwave heights compared toan armour layer with no broken units However failureoccurredatapproximatelythesamewaveheightsasforan armour layer with no broken units Increasing thepercentageofbrokenunitsornumberofbrokenunitsinaclusterhadonlyaminoradditionalnegativeeffectonstart
ofdamageandfailureThepositionofthedamagedunitsaround the stillwater line overaheight of2Hdgavenodifference in influence of the broken units on start ofdamageandfailureThemajorityofthedetachednosesandlegsshowedlittletonomovementandstayedinthearmour layeror even tend todigthemselvesin the firstunderlayerCONCLUSIONS
983108983137983149983137983143983141 983152983154983151983143983154983141983155983155983145983151983150 983142983151983154 983140983145983142983142983141983154983141983150983156 983137983154983149983151983157983154 983148983137983161983141983154983155
983092 983091983090 983089
983155983156983137983154983156 983151983142 983140983137983149983137983143983141
983142983137983145983148983157983154983141
983112983155983087983112983140
983118 983157 983149 983138 983141 983154 983151 983142 983140 983145 983155 983152 983148 983137 983139 983141 983140 983137
983154 983149 983151 983157 983154 983157 983150 983145 983156 983155
983089 983140983137983149983137983143983141 983152983154983151983143983154983141983155983155983145983151 983150 983137983154983149983151983157983154 983148983137983161983141983154 983159983145983156983144 983128983138983148983151983139 983157983150983145983156983155983090 983141983160983152983141983139 983156983141983140 983140983137983149983137983143983141 983152983154983151983143983154983141 983155983155983145983151983150 983137983154983149983151983157983154 983148983137983161983141983154 983159983145983156983144 983140983137983149983137983143983141983140 983128983138983148983151983139 983157983150983145983156983155983091 983149983141983137983155983157983154983141983140 983140983137983149983137983143983141 983152983154983151983143983154983141983155983155983145983151 983150 983137983154983149983151983157983154 983148983137983161983141983154 983159983145983156983144 983140983137983149983137983143983141983140 983128983138983148983151983139 983157983150983145983156983155983092 983140983137983149983137983143983141 983152983154983151983143983154983141983155983155983145983151 983150 983137983154983149983151983157983154 983148983137983161983141983154 983159983145983156983144 983154983145983152983085983154983137983152 983154983151983139 983147
Figure2ndashgeneraldamagebehaviourfordifferenttypesofarmourlayer
The damage progression of an armour layer withdamaged units is long and gradual compared to thedamageprogressionofanarmourlayerwithnodamagedarmourunitsThistypeofdamageprogressionlookslikethedamageprogressionofanarmourlayerconsistingofrip-raprockOnlyafewbrokennosesand legsshoweddisplacementduring the test series Itis therefore unlikelythatunderinfluence of the waves the broken parts will act asprojectilesdamagingotherunits