breast elastography

75

Click here to load reader

Upload: antonio-pio-masciotra

Post on 16-Apr-2017

1.132 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Breast elastography

Elasticità e tessuto neoplastico

Considerazioni di fisiopatologia

Antonio Pio Masciotra

Campobasso-Molise-Italia

Email : [email protected] : antonio.masciotra

Page 2: Breast elastography

Mechanical (elastic) properties of neoplastic tissue

Physiopathology

Antonio Pio Masciotra

Campobasso-Molise-Italy

Email : [email protected] : antonio.masciotra

Page 3: Breast elastography

Elastografia mammaria :

quantitativa o qualitativa?

Antonio Pio Masciotra

Campobasso

Email : [email protected] : antonio.masciotra

Page 4: Breast elastography

Breast sonoelastography :

quantitative or qualitative?

Antonio Pio Masciotra

Campobasso-Molise-Italy

Email : [email protected] : antonio.masciotra

Page 5: Breast elastography

HardnessIt is the ability of a material to resist scratching, abrasion, indentation or penetration.

Stiffness (Rigidity)The resistance of a material to deflection is called stiffness or rigidity. Steel is stiffer or more rigid than aluminium.Stiffness is measured by Young’s modulus E. The higher the value of the Young’s modulus, the stiffer the material.

ElasticityElasticity of a material is its power of coming back to its original position after deformation when the stress or load is removed. Elasticity is a tensile property of its material.The greatest stress that a material can endure without taking up some permanent set is called elastic limit.

PRINCIPAL MECHANICAL PROPERTIES

Those characteristics of the materials which describe their behaviour under external loads are known as Mechanical Properties.

The most important and useful mechanical properties are:

StrengthIt is the resistance offered by a material when subjected to external loading. So, stronger the material the greater the load it can withstand.Depending upon the type of load applied the strength can be tensile, compressive, shear or torsional.The maximum stress that any material will withstand before destruction is called its ultimate strength.

Page 6: Breast elastography

DUREZZAE’ la capacità di un materiale a resistere al graffio, all’abrasione, alla scalfittura od alla penetrazione

STIFFNESS (RIGIDITA’)E’ la resistenza che un materiale oppone al suo ‘piegamento’.L’acciaio è più rigido dell’alluminio. La stiffness viene misurata dal Modulo di Young E. Quanto maggiore è il valore del modulo di Young tanto maggiore è la stiffness del materiale.

ELASTICITA’E’ la capacità di un materiale a recuperare le sue posizione e forma iniziali dopo la rimozione di un carico od una forza, la cui applicazione ne aveva indotto la deformazione.

PRINCIPALI PROPRIETA’ MECCANICHE

Le caratteristiche dei materiali che descrivono il loro comportamento quando vengono sottoposti a carichi esterni vengono definite PROPRIETA’ MECCANICHE.

Le più importanti di esse sono:

FORZAE’ la resistenza offerta da un materiale quando viene sottoposto ad un carico esterno.Pertanto, quanto più forte è un materiale tanto maggiore sarà il carico che esso può sorreggere.

Page 7: Breast elastography
Page 8: Breast elastography

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPE

Page 9: Breast elastography

Stiffness distribution of cells and results of migration and invasion test

Citation: Xu W, Mezencev R, Kim B, Wang L, McDonald J, et al. (2012) Cell Stiffness Is a Biomarker of the Metastatic Potential of Ovarian Cancer Cells. PLoS ONE 7(10): e46609. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0046609

Page 10: Breast elastography

The distribution of the actin network plays an important role in determining the mechanical properties of single cells.As cells transform from non-malignant to cancerous states, their cytoskeletal structure changes from an organized to an irregular network, and this change subsequently reduces the stiffness of single cells.Further progressive reduction of stiffness corresponds to an increase in invasive and migratory capacity of malignant cells.

Single cell stiffness reduction

Less invasive

More invasive

Normal cell toward cancer cell

Page 11: Breast elastography

Mammary epithelial growth and morphogenesis is regulated by matrix stiffness. (A) 3D cultures of normal mammary epithelial cells within collagen gels of different concentration.Stiffening the ECM through an incremental increase in collagen concentration (soft gels: 1 mg/ml Collagen I, 140 Pa; stiff gels 3.6 mg/ml Collagen I, 1200 Pa) results in the progressive perturbation of morphogenesis, and the increased growth and modulated survival of MECs.

Altered mammary acini morphology is illustrated by the destabilization of cell–cell adherens junctions and disruption of basal tissue polarity indicated by the gradual loss of cell–cell localized β-catenin (green) and disorganized β4 integrin (red) visualized throughimmunofluorescence and confocal imaging.

Kass et al. Page 9Int J Biochem Cell Biol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2009 March 19.NIH-PA

Page 12: Breast elastography
Page 13: Breast elastography

Tumor cells’ stiffness decreases

Extracellular matrix’s stiffness increases

Page 14: Breast elastography

La rigidità delle cellule neoplastiche diminuisce

La rigidità della matrice extracellulare aumenta

Page 15: Breast elastography

NVV

Colorazioni istopatologiche per evidenziare

HES

CD 31

Masson’s Trichrome

Cellularità

Fibrosis

Densità dei vasi

Page 16: Breast elastography

NVV

Histopathology techniques show

HES

CD 31

Masson’s Trichrome

Cellularity

Fibrosis

Microvascular density

Page 17: Breast elastography

Stiffness in funzione del volume

a) Molto ‘molle’ (9 kPa) ‘Duro’ (50 kPa) Molto ‘duro’ (108 kPa) ‘Molle’ (22 kPa)

5 mm 11 mm 16 mm7 mm

Page 18: Breast elastography

Stiffness depending on volume

a) Very soft (9 kPa) Stiff (50 kPa) Very stiff (108 kPa) Soft (22 kPa)

5 mm 11 mm 16 mm7 mm

Page 19: Breast elastography

Stiffness in funzione della composizione

Densità dei vasi

Cellularità

Fibrosi

Molto ‘molle’ ‘Duro’ Molto ‘duro’‘Molle’

Page 20: Breast elastography

Stiffness depending on composition

Microvascular density

Cellularity

Fibrosis

Very soft Stiff Very stiffSoft

Page 21: Breast elastography

Pathological stiffness score

Very soft Soft Stiff Very stiff0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

MVD score

Cellularity score

Fibrosis score

"Pathological Stiffness Score

Page 22: Breast elastography

Transizione da un ‘imaging’ ‘morfologico’ ad un’imaging fisiopatologico?

Page 23: Breast elastography

Going from a morphologic to a physiopathologic ‘imaging’?

Page 24: Breast elastography

Transizione da un ‘imaging’ ‘morfologico’ ad un’imaging fisiopatologico?

SOFTVUESOFTVUE

Page 25: Breast elastography

Going from a morphologic to a physiopathologic ‘imaging’?

SOFTVUESOFTVUE

Page 26: Breast elastography

Nell’Antico Egitto il riscontro di una massa dura nel corpo veniva correlata ad uno stato di malattia.

Nella Medicina Ippocratica la palpazione era parte essenziale dell’esame fisico del paziente.

Nel Terzo Millennio la «Palpazione Remota» sta diventando realtà grazie all’ Imaging Elastografico.

Page 27: Breast elastography

In ancient Egypt, a link was established between a hard mass within the human body & pathology.

In Hippocratic medicine, palpation was an essential part of a physical examination.

In the 21st century, «remote palpation» by means of elastographic imaging is becoming a reality.

Page 28: Breast elastography

Many R& D techniques have emerged since the 1990s, based on the Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance imaging modalities.

Sonoelasticity: KJ Parker et al, 1990 Ultrasound Strain Elastography: J Ophir et al, 1991 MR Elastography: R Sinkus et al, 2000 Shear Wave Elastography: J Bercoff et al, 2004

All techniques are based on the same principle: Generate a stress, and then use an imaging technique to map the

tissue response to this stress in every point of the image. but differ substantially in terms of their performance

characteristics: Qualitative / quantitative nature, absolute / relative quantification. Accuracy / precision / reproducibility, … Spatial / temporal resolution, sensitivity / penetration, …

28

Page 29: Breast elastography

The basic principle used is the one proposed by Ophir’s group in the early 1990s:

1. Tissue compression (Stress) is induced manually by the user.

2. Multiple images are recorded using conventional imaging at standard frame rates.

3. The relative deformation (Strain) is estimated using Tissue Doppler techniques.

4. The derived strains are displayed as a qualitative elasticity image.

Initially introduced by Hitachi, and later on Siemens, in the early 2000s.

More manufacturers have followed in the last year(s).

29

Page 30: Breast elastography

Stress Source Manual Compression (user-dependent). Stress Frequency Static (user-induced vibration < 2 Hz). Result Type Qualitative image (E=Stress/Strain, but Stress is

unknown). Relative quantification (Background-to-Lesion-Ratio).

Strain Elastography Summary

Straightforward implementation on current scanners (standard acquisition architecture, plus Tissue-Doppler-like processing)..

Stress penetration / uniformity issues. User-applied compression is attenuated by soft objects & depth and cannot penetrate hard-shelled lesions.

User-dependence. User-applied compression is attenuated by soft objects & depth,

and cannot penetrate hard-shelled lesions.30

Page 31: Breast elastography

External

Mechanical force

Natural

Heart

SuperSonic Imagine has developed a novel method called SonicTouch,

which is based on focused ultrasound, and can remotely generate Shear Wave-fronts providing uniform coverage of a 2D area interest.

Page 32: Breast elastography

Esempio di viscosità La sostanza in basso ha maggior viscosità

della sostanza acquosa in alto

Page 33: Breast elastography

Viscosity demonstration The bottom substance has higher viscosity

than the clear liquid above

Page 34: Breast elastography

Strain vs. Shear Wave Elastography

34

Strain Elastography tends to produce abinary classification, where the whole lesion is either hard or soft.

Shear Wave Elastography provides richer & more complex information with many cases of hard borders plus soft centers.

The differences between Strain and Shear Wave Elastography are not surprising, given the very different principles on which they are based.

Page 35: Breast elastography

Shear Wave Elastography

Highly-localized estimationof tissue elasticity • Especially, inside hard lesions

Phantom with liquid center inside hard lesion

Strain Elastography interprets the wholelesion as hard, because the applied manualcompression cannot penetrate the hard shell.

Shear Wave Elastography can “see” insidethe hard lesion, because the shear waves can propagate through the hard shell.

35

Page 36: Breast elastography

Tipo di tessuto/organo Young’s modulus E (kPa)

Densità(kg/L)

Mammella Tessuto adiposo normale 18-24

1.0 ± 10%

~ Acqua

Tessuto ghiandolare normale 28-66

Tessuto fibroso 96-244

Carcinoma 22-560

Prostata Parte anteriore normale 55-63

Parte posteriore normale 62-71

Iperplasia benigna 36-41

Carcinoma 96-241

Muscolo 6-7

Fegato Parenchima sano 0.4-6

Rene Tessuto fibroso 10-55

Page 37: Breast elastography

Breast multiple fibroadenomas – Directional PD

• Mother (58 years old) • Daughter (29 years old)

Page 38: Breast elastography

Breast multiple fibroadenomas – SW Elastography

• Mother (58 years old) • Daughter (29 years old)

Page 39: Breast elastography

Breast SWE – Normal• Fat 53.5 kPa• Gland 29.0 kPa

Page 40: Breast elastography

Breast SWE – Hyperechoic nodule in fat• Fat 7.8 kPa

• Nodule 4.8 kPa

Page 41: Breast elastography

Breast SWE – unilateral gynecomastia 16 years

• Nodule 14.8 kPa• Parenchima 21.3 kPa

Page 42: Breast elastography

RT induced effects on breastBidimensional US

6 months after RT 13 years after RT

Page 43: Breast elastography

RT induced effects on breastSW Elastography

6 months after RT 135 kPa 13 years after RT 25 kPa

Page 44: Breast elastography

RT induced breast subacute effects3D US

Page 45: Breast elastography

RT induced breast subacute effects3D SWE

Page 46: Breast elastography
Page 47: Breast elastography

Breast complicated cystBidimensional US

First study 7 days after therapy

Page 48: Breast elastography

Breast complicated cystPowerdoppler

First study 7 days after therapy

Page 49: Breast elastography

Breast complicated cystSW Elastography

First study 7 days after therapy

Page 50: Breast elastography

Breast complicated cyst3D US

First study 7 days after therapy

Page 51: Breast elastography

Breast complicated cyst3D SWE

First study 7 days after therapy

Page 52: Breast elastography

Breast complicated cyst SWE different settings

Resolution mode Penetration mode

Page 53: Breast elastography

Breast fibroadenomas Bidimensional US

Almost homogeneous Inhomogeneous

Page 54: Breast elastography

Breast fibroadenomas SW Elastography

Different kPa 26kPa Vs 83 kPa

Similar elasticity ratio2.1 Vs 2.5

Page 55: Breast elastography

Breast papillary carcinoma

2008

2009

2010

2011

2008200920102011

Page 56: Breast elastography

Breast carcinoma – Mammography

Benign Malignant

Page 57: Breast elastography

Breast carcinoma – US

Bidimensional – 0.89 cm 3D – 1.86 xm

Page 58: Breast elastography

Breast carcinoma – SWE

Bidimensional 3D

Page 59: Breast elastography

Breast carcinoma – SWE

• High transparence • Low transparence

Page 60: Breast elastography

Breast carcinoma Vs Fibroadenoma SWE

• High transparence • High transparence

Page 61: Breast elastography

2 more nodules in the same breast Bidimensional US

Nodule n. 1 Nodule n. 2

Page 62: Breast elastography

2 more nodules in the same breast SW Elastography (both benign at histology)

Nodule n. 1 Nodule n. 2

Page 63: Breast elastography

Breast carcinoma – Axilla US

Bidimensional 3D

Page 64: Breast elastography

Breast carcinoma – Axilla SWE

Bidimensional 3D

Page 65: Breast elastography

Lymphnodes 2D US

B cell Lymphoma Breast cancer metastasis

Page 66: Breast elastography

Lymphnodes US 3D

B cell Lymphoma Breast cancer metastasis

Page 67: Breast elastography

Lymphnodes SWE

B cell Lymphoma Breast cancer metastasis

Page 68: Breast elastography

Lymphnodes in different sites in the same patientBidimensional US

B cell Lymphoma inguinal B cell Lymphoma ext. iliac

Page 69: Breast elastography

Lymphnodes in different sites in the same patientSW Elastography

B cell Lymphoma inguinal B cell Lymphoma ext. iliac

Page 70: Breast elastography

Lymphnodes SWE Different stiffness depending on histology

• B cell Lymphoma - 21 kPa • Breast cancer metastasis – 16 kPa

• NET metastasis -209 kPa

Page 71: Breast elastography
Page 72: Breast elastography

Aims of elastography

Correct tissue elasticity quantification

Identification of ‘cut off’ elasticity values for the right diagnostic workup of

diffuse and focal diseases

Page 73: Breast elastography

Breast lipomas SW Elastography precision and repeatibility

Fat 19.9 kPa Lipoma 20.5 kPaSW Ratio 1.03

Ore 10:07:09

Fat 8.0 kPa Lipoma 7.8 kPaSW Ratio 1.03

Ore 10:07:34

Page 74: Breast elastography

Breast sonoelastography :Question n. 1 :

quantitative or qualitative?

Answer n. 1 Quantitative!

Question n. 2 :

SW or Strain Elastography?

Answer n. 2 SW Elastography

Antonio Pio Masciotra

Campobasso-Molise-Italy

Email : [email protected] : antonio.masciotra

Page 75: Breast elastography

Email : [email protected] : antonio.masciotra