broken capitalism, lecture 1 with david gordon - mises academy
DESCRIPTION
For lecture videos, readings, and other class materials, you can sign up for this independent study course at academy.mises.org.TRANSCRIPT
Broken Capitalism, Lecture 1
David GordonMises AcademyJune 18, 2013
No Intermediate System
• We can distinguish two different ways the economy can be organized: capitalism and socialism.
• Under socialism, production is centrally controlled. This doesn’t have to be formal ownership.
No Intermediate Continued
• Another system is the free market, based on social cooperation and voluntary exchange.
• There is no third system. Mises elsewhere mentions syndicalism.
• An objection comes up: what happens if the government owns some industries, e.g., railroads? Why isn’t this an intermediate system?
Answer to Objection
• This is not a valid objection. If the government takes over production of something within a market economy, this is still a market economy.
• Nationalized industries must still sell their products on the market. They compete for money from consumers.
Problems of Nationalized Industries
• These industries don’t face the same pressures to meet consumer demands as private businesses.
• If a government service loses money, it can get more money through taxes.
• Also, bureaucrats who operate businesses aren’t risking their own funds. They are just playing at the market.
Calculational Chaos
• Mises showed in Socialism that a fully socialist economy can’t work.
• It can’t decide how to use production goods that can be used in different ways.
• The only way to allocate resources efficiently is though calculation in money. This requires market prices.
Chaos Continued
• The calculation argument doesn’t apply only to full socialism.
• Introducing socialist elements in a market economy creates “islands of calculational chaos.”
• Rothbard wrote about this in MES.
Interventionism
• The government can interfere with the free market in another way than taking over production of goods and services.
• It can pass laws that restrict market transactions in certain ways. E.g., price control, including minimum wage laws and rent control, and tariffs.
Interventionism Continued
• These interventions don’t create a third system between capitalism and socialism either.
• They only hamper the working of the free market economy.
A Pattern of Argument
• Mises’s criticism of interventionism follows a characteristic pattern of argument.
• The pattern is that we first take the goal that the interventionist wants.
• Then, we show that the intervention won’t achieve this.
• This is a value-free method of criticism.
Price Control
• Suppose that the government thinks that the price of milk is too high.
• At the high price, the poor find it hard to buy milk.
• The government decides to impose a maximum price on milk to make it easier for the poor to buy milk.
Price Control Continued
• What will happen? At the lower price, more milk will be demanded by consumers. But suppliers won’t supply more.
• Marginal sellers, i.e., those making the least return, will leave the business of selling milk.
• Note that Mises assumes that people in the business don’t all earn the same return. They would only do so in equilibrium.
Result of Price Control
• As a result of the government’s action, less milk is available.
• This was not what the price control was supposed to do.
• This is an example of a criticism that doesn’t make a value judgment.
Rent Control
• Exactly the same process takes place with rent control.
• The aim of rent control is to make more housing available for the poor.
• At the rent-controlled price, more housing is demanded than is available.
• Landlords who can’t make money will withdraw housing from the market and avoid making repairs.
More Rent Control
• The result is again that the aims of rent control aren’t achieved.
• More housing does not become available for the poor.
Minimum Wage Laws
• Minimum wage laws are supposed to raise wages for workers. They are not intended to harm workers.
• A minimum wage is a price floor. More workers will want to work at the minimum wage than employers are willing to hire.
• Workers who aren’t worth the minimum wage to the employer will be fired or not hired.
More Interventions
• Again, the intervention fails to achieve the goal.
• Tariffs make products mote costly for consumers.
• By decreasing competition, they enable cartels to be formed.
Reaction to Failure
• What happens when intervention fails?• The government may respond with more
intervention.• Milk sellers under price control complain that
they can’t make a profit. The government may respond by imposing price controls on their suppliers, to lower their costs.
Failure Continued
• These new interventions will also fail.• If the government responds with still more
interventions, this will lead to total government control of the economy.
• This took place in Germany in WWI (the Hindenburg plan) and also in Britain in WWI and WWII.
• Churchill brought socialism to Britain, not the post-war Labour Government.
Nazi Economics
• Although the Nazi regime kept the form of private property, it was a type of socialism.
• Prices and wages were set by government directives.
• The Marxist interpretation of Nazism is that big business was in control. But actually, the government ran things.
Mises and Government
• Mises opposes the slogan “that government is best which governs least.”
• He says government should fulfill its proper functions, i.e., defense and protection.
• This can be interpreted in a way consistent with anarchism, although Mises didn’t go this way.
Government Continued
• The key point is that force should be restricted to defense and protection. Force cannot justifiably be used for other things in the free market.
• This would be true also under anarcho-capitalism.
• The restriction of force is Mises’s point here, not whether defense and protection must be provided by a monopoly agency.