brought to you by team daisy lele| hui min jing yi|xiao qian|ian
TRANSCRIPT
SEMANTICS
Brought to you by Team Daisy
LELE| HUI MIN JING YI|XIAO QIAN|IAN
TASK 1:DENOTATION VS.
REFERENTS
Denotations literal meaning of the word. Speakers of the same language usually have the same understanding
Referents Tied to situations; usually changes. Often something you can point at or mental images, using as references.
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
a)The President of United States
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
a) The President of United States
We are only referents!Something that you can see, point at and make references.
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
a)The President of United States
Denotation:
The elected head of the country, United States
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
b) The capital of Canada
Referents:
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
b) The capital of Canada
Denotation:
A state where the government of Canada functions in
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
c) The woman who walked on the moon
Referents:
The first woman who went to the moon Girl’s failed attempt at moonwalkingQ1:Denotati
on vs Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
c) The woman who walked on the moon
Denotations:
A female who went out of space, landed on the moon, and walked.
(not a particular/specific woman, but any woman)
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
c) The woman who walked on the moon
Denotations:
A female who went out of space, landed on the moon, and walked.
(not a particular/specific woman, but any woman)
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
d) My linguist professor
Referents: Dr. Yosuke Sato @ NUS
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
d) My linguist professor
Denotation:- Someone who teaches me the science of a language- Someone’s lectures on science of language that I attend
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
TASK 2:METAPHORS WE LIVE BY
DETERMINE THE BASIS FOR EACH OF THE METAPHORSB) The eye of a needle
the foot of the bed
The hands of the clock
The arm of a chair
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
Describe parts of an object in terms of human body
components
Target: parts of an objectSource: human body components
DETERMINE THE BASIS FOR EACH OF THE METAPHORSC) This lecture is easy to digest
He just eats up the lecturer’s words.
Chew on this thought for awhile.
Listen to this juicy piece of gossip.
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
Describe information in terms of food
Target: information Source: food
DETERMINE THE BASIS FOR EACH OF THE METAPHORSD) Your claims are indefensible.
He shot down all my arguments
His criticisms were right on target.
If you use that strategy, he’ll wipe you out.
I demolished his argument.
He attacked every weak point in my argument.
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
Describe arguments in terms of war
Target: argumentsSource: war
DETERMINE THE BASIS FOR EACH OF THE METAPHORSF) He unleased his anger.
Her anger was aroused.
Your temper is ferocious.
She was bristling with rage.
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
Describe anger in terms of a dangerous animal
Target: anger Source: a dangerous animal
TASK 3:LOCAL ENTAILMENT
LOGICAL ENTAILMENTDEFINITION:
Proposition A entails Proposition B if
the truth of A makes B necessarily true.
i.e. If A is true, B has to be true.
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
LOGICAL ENTAILMENTThe statement Hilary and Dana are married to each other entails
A.Hilary is woman.
B.Dana is Hilary’s spouse.
C.Hilary and Dana are husband and wife.
D.Dana is not single.
E.Hilary and Dana live together.
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
LOGICAL ENTAILMENTThe statement Hilary and Dana are married to each other entails
A.Hilary is woman.
B.Dana is Hilary’s spouse.
C.Hilary and Dana are husband and wife.
D.Dana is not single.
E.Hilary and Dana live together.
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
LOGICAL ENTAILMENTThe statement Hilary and Dana are married to each other does not entail
A. Hilary is woman.
being married to each other does not indicate their respective gender
C. Hilary and Dana are husband and wife.
being married to each other does not guarantee that there is a husband and a wife in the marriage. exceptions: homosexual marriages
E. Hilary and Dana live together.
they can be married but live in different places, in different countries at the momentQ1:Denotati
on vs Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
LOGICAL ENTAILMENTThe statement Hilary and Dana are married to each other entails
B. Dana is Hilary’s spouse.
If Hilary and Dana are married to each other, then Dana is definitely Hilary’s spouse.
D. Dana is not single.
If Hilary and Dana are married to each other, then Dana is definitely not single. Dana cannot be married and single at the same time.
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
LOGICAL ENTAILMENTThe statement Romeo kissed Juliet passionately entails
A.Romeo kissed Juliet.
B.Juliet kissed Romeo.
C.Romeo kissed Juliet many times.
D.Juliet was kissed by Romeo.
E.Romeo loves Juliet.
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
LOGICAL ENTAILMENTThe statement Romeo kissed Juliet passionately entails
A.Romeo kissed Juliet.
B.Juliet kissed Romeo (Possible)
C.Romeo kissed Juliet many times.
D.Juliet was kissed by Romeo.
E.Romeo loves Juliet.
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
LOGICAL ENTAILMENTThe statement Romeo kissed Juliet passionately does not entail
B. Juliet kissed Romeo.
Romeo kissed Juliet passionately does not indicate any action on Juliet’s part.
However, B can be entailment if ‘kiss’ have a reciprocal meaning.
C. Romeo kissed Juliet many times.
kissing passionately does not necessarily mean kissing many times.
E. Romeo loves Juliet.
Romeo kissed Juliet passionately does not necessarily mean Romeo loves Juliet.
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
LOGICAL ENTAILMENTThe statement Romeo kissed Juliet passionately entails
A. Romeo kissed Juliet
If Romeo kissed Juliet passionately, then he must have kissed Juliet.
D. Juliet was kissed by Romeo.
If Romeo kissed Juliet passionately, then Juliet must have been kissed by Romeo.
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
LOGICAL ENTAILMENTThe statement John shot Tom’s brother dead entails
A.John is a murderer.
B.Tom’s brother was a victim of violent crime.
C.Tom’s brother is dead.
D.John knew Tom’s brother.
E.John hated Tom.
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
LOGICAL ENTAILMENTThe statement John shot Tom’s brother dead entails
A.John is a murderer.
B.Tom’s brother was a victim of violent crime.
C.Tom’s brother is dead.
D.John knew Tom’s brother.
E.John hated Tom.
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
LOGICAL ENTAILMENTThe statement John shot Tom’s brother dead does not entail
A. John is a murderer.
A murderer kills with malicious intent, but John might not have malicious intents while shooting Tom’s brother. (unintentional killing?)
Case where John is a policemen may also negate the fact that John is a murderer.
D. John knew Tom’s brother.
John did not have to know Tom’s brother to shoot him.
E. John hated Tom.
John did not have to hate Tom to shoot his brother.Q1:Denotati
on vs Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
LOGICAL ENTAILMENTThe statement John shot Tom’s brother dead entails
B. Tom’s brother was a victim of violent crime.
B is not entailment as it may not be violent (Eg. Euthanasia, shot in the sense of needle poke)
It could also be a case of crime where John may be a police shooting down the criminal, Tom. The shooting may be voluntary and Tom can be an animal.
C. Tom’s brother is dead.
If John shot Tom’s brother dead, it must be true that Tom’s brother is dead.Q1:Denotati
on vs Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
TASK 4:PRESUPPOSITION
PRESUPPOSITIONS
An assumption.
A ‘hidden premise’
An implicit assumption about the world or background belief relating to a sentence whose truth is taken for granted, so to speak.
An assumption which must be non-negotiable for a proposition to make sense.
*If required, you may use the negation test, where the negation of a sentence does NOT change its presuppositions.
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
A) IDENTIFY THE SENTENCE THAT CONTAINS PRESUPPOSITIONS;B) LOCATE THE WORD RESPONSIBLE FOR IT.
John regrets that Maria went to the graduation ceremony.
John believes that Maria went to the graduation ceremony
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
John regrets that Maria went to the graduation ceremony.
“Regrets” The graduation ceremony must have had taken place John knows that Maria went for the graduation ceremony John knows the existence of Maria.
John believes that Maria went to the graduation ceremony.
“Believes” John does not know for sure if Maria went to the graduation ceremony or not. John does not know if the ceremony that Maria went for is the graduation
ceremony or another ceremony
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
A) IDENTIFY THE SENTENCE THAT CONTAINS PRESUPPOSITIONS;B) LOCATE THE WORD RESPONSIBLE FOR IT.
The Captain thought that the ship was in danger.
The Captain realized that the ship was in danger.
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
A) IDENTIFY THE SENTENCE THAT CONTAINS PRESUPPOSITIONS;B) LOCATE THE WORD RESPONSIBLE FOR IT.
The Captain thought that the ship was in danger.
“Thought” Like “believes,” this word conveys an opinion about something that may not be
true. It may not be the ship that was in danger, but someone/something else Nothing may in fact be in danger.
The Captain realized that the ship was in danger.
“Realised” The ship was in danger. The Captain recognised the existence of the ship. The Captain had received some form of indicator that the ship was in danger.Q1:Denotati
on vs Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
A) IDENTIFY THE SENTENCE THAT CONTAINS PRESUPPOSITIONS;B) LOCATE THE WORD RESPONSIBLE FOR IT.
It is significant that the criminal was sentenced.
It is likely that the criminal was sentenced.
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
A) IDENTIFY THE SENTENCE THAT CONTAINS PRESUPPOSITIONS;B) LOCATE THE WORD RESPONSIBLE FOR IT.
It is significant that the criminal was sentenced.
“Significant” Signals that the criminal has been sentenced The criminal was caught. The criminal has been proven by the legal authorities to be a ‘criminal’
It is likely that the criminal was sentenced.
“Likely” Like, “believes” and “thought,” this word indicates a suggestion, which does not
affirm the actuality of events. The sentence may not have been issued. The criminal may not have been
sentenced. The criminal may not have been caught. The supposed ‘criminal’ may have not been proven guilty, or have been proven innocent.
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
A) IDENTIFY THE SENTENCE THAT CONTAINS PRESUPPOSITIONS;B) LOCATE THE WORD RESPONSIBLE FOR IT.
IDENTIFY THE PRESUPPOSITION IN THE WH-QUESTIONSWho killed Sylvia?
Sylvia is dead.
A person killed Sylvia.
A person called Sylvia exists.
The person that killed Sylvia exists.
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
IDENTIFY THE PRESUPPOSITION IN THE WH-QUESTIONS
Where did you put the cheese?
There is something called cheese.
You know the location of the cheese.
The cheese was moved by someone - ‘you’.
‘you’ know the cheese I am referring to.
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
IDENTIFY THE PRESUPPOSITION IN THE WH-QUESTIONSWhy is there sadness in the world?
There is a concept such as sadness.
There is a world. (DUH…)
There’s a reason for sadness.
Q1:Denotation vs
Referents
Q2: Metaphors
Q3:Logical Entailment
Q4 (A): Presuppositi
on
Q4 (B): Presuppositi
onEND
THANK YOU.