brown v. united states 462 f.3d 609 (6 th cir. 2005) * the beginning of the end of a type of...

23
2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel *How real gender discrimination can occur as an unintended consequence of badly construed law

Upload: luis-shepherd

Post on 26-Mar-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Brown v. United States 462 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel

Brown v. United States462 F.3d 609 (6th Cir. 2005)

* The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination

of pregnant military personnel*How real gender discrimination can

occur as an unintended consequence of badly construed law

[redacted]

Page 2: Brown v. United States 462 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel

Sovereign ImmunityYou cannot sue the king

(or the government)

Page 3: Brown v. United States 462 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel

Until: Plane crashes at full speed into the tallest building in

Manhattan with many killed and injured

September 11, 2001?

Page 4: Brown v. United States 462 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel

July 28, 1945

Page 5: Brown v. United States 462 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel

Plane was a US Military B-25 Bomber piloted by a Lt. Colonel

who, in thick fog, was told he couldn’t land at LaGuardia airport due to no visibility

He started an approach anyway and crashed.

Page 6: Brown v. United States 462 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel

Federal Tort Claims Act (1946)Waiver of Sovereign Immunity

Allows the government to be sued for damages caused by the

negligence of U.S. government employees

Page 7: Brown v. United States 462 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel

Supreme Court makes an Exception

No liability for injury or death of service member that arises “incident

to service”Feres Doctrine

Feres v. United States340 U.S. 135 (1950)

Page 8: Brown v. United States 462 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel

“Incident to Service” means anything that a military person does

that is even remotely related to their involvement in the military.

Specifically, includes care at military medical institutions.

Page 9: Brown v. United States 462 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel

Feres cites three rationales why military personnel can’t sue the

government:1. military relationship is distinctly

federal2. no fault system of military

benefits3. maintain military discipline

Page 10: Brown v. United States 462 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel

Supreme Court Expands Exception No liability to third parties whose

injuries derive from injuries to service members (1977)

Examples:Cut off wrong leg of military member- family cannot sue

Radiation induced birth defects

Page 11: Brown v. United States 462 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel

Exception Expanded Again:Treatment accorded a military

mother is inherently inseparable from the treatment of the fetus in

the mother’s body (1982)

Result: Children born of active duty military mothers are barred by Feres and have no recourse for negligent

prenatal care

Page 12: Brown v. United States 462 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel

BUT Children born of active duty military fathers (via civilian

mother) are NOT barred by Feres and have full recourse for negligent prenatal care

Page 13: Brown v. United States 462 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel

RESULTDecades of Gender

discrimination as a result of an unintended consequence of

badly construed lawIn race to limit governmental

liability a system of gender discrimination was set in place

Page 14: Brown v. United States 462 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel

Spina Bifida: a failure of the neural tube to close during fetal

development- Neural Tube Defect

Most common severe birth defect

Approximately 70% of spina bifida cases are avoided if mother takes adequate folic acid during critical

time period

Page 15: Brown v. United States 462 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel
Page 16: Brown v. United States 462 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel
Page 17: Brown v. United States 462 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel
Page 18: Brown v. United States 462 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel
Page 19: Brown v. United States 462 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel
Page 20: Brown v. United States 462 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel

Argument: Treatment with folic acid was for the health benefit of

the baby, not the mother

Child’s injuries are independent of any injury to parent- No injury

whatsoever to motherMother not even a plaintiff

Page 21: Brown v. United States 462 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel

Holding: The FTCA does not preclude recovery for negligent

prenatal injuries to the child of a military service person that are

independent of any injury to the child’s parent

Page 22: Brown v. United States 462 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel

Special Bonus: Because [Redacted] involved preconceptional care, the full gamut of pregnancy care from

before conception to delivery is now subject to review by the courts

Page 23: Brown v. United States 462 F.3d 609 (6 th Cir. 2005) * The beginning of the end of a type of systematic gender discrimination of pregnant military personnel

Case was remanded to the trial court and tried to a judgment.

Plaintiffs prevailed.