bruce archambeault, phd - penn state harrisburg...2017/02/20 · 18 effective inductance for...
TRANSCRIPT
PCB Effects for Power Integrity
Bruce Archambeault, PhD
IEEE Fellow, MST Adjunct Professor
IBM Distinguished Engineer Emeritus
2
PCB Issues for
Optimum Power Integrity
• Inductance dominates performance
– Which inductance? Under what
circumstances?
• Effect of capacitance value
• Effect of number of capacitors
• Effect of capacitor density
• Effect of capacitor via configuration
• Case Study
33
10-4
10-2
100
10-3
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
Frequency[GHz]
Inp
ut
Imp
edan
ce a
t IC
po
rt [Ω
]
Step1 - 1 Capacitor
Step2 - 19 Capacitors
Step3 - 43 Capactors
eq planes decouplingC C C= +
highL
IC planes Decaps ijL L L M+ + +
Design Geometry, Current Path, and ZPDN
4
Model for Plane Recharge Investigations
Port2 Port2
(4,5)(4,5)Port1Port1
(8,7)(8,7)
a = 12a = 12
b = 10b = 10
d = 35 mild = 35 milCdec Cdec
(4.05,5)(4.05,5)
Decoupling Capacitor :
C = 1uF
ESR = 30mOhm
ESL = 0.5nH
5.4=rε
DC voltage used to DC voltage used to
charge the power charge the power
plane plane
VdcVdc
I inputI input
Port3 Port3
(4,4.95)(4,4.95)
Port2 Port2
(4,5)(4,5)Port1Port1
(8,7)(8,7)
a = 12a = 12
b = 10b = 10
d = 35 mild = 35 milCdec Cdec
(4.05,5)(4.05,5)
Decoupling Capacitor :
C = 1uF
ESR = 30mOhm
ESL = 0.5nH
5.4=rε
DC voltage used to DC voltage used to
charge the power charge the power
plane plane
VdcVdc
I inputI input
Port3 Port3
(4,4.95)(4,4.95)
Port 2 represents IC current draw
5
Charge Between Planes vs..
Charge Drawn by IC
Board total charge : C*V = 3.5nF*3.3V = 11nC
Pulse charge 5A peak : I*dt/2 = (1ns*5A)/2=2.5nC
6
Triangular pulses (5 Amps Peak)
7
Charge Depletion vs. Capacitor Distance
8
Charge Depletion for Capacitor @ 400 mils for Various connection Inductance
9
Effect of Multiple Capacitors While Keeping Total Capacitance Constant
(power-ground pins at IC center)
12”
10”
Port1 (8,7)
(Ls 50nH)
Port2 (4,5)
(power pin)
εr =4.5
Decap
Ground pin
1 inch
The decap locations are 800mils from the power pin
• C=1uF
• ESL=0.5nH
• ESR=1Ω
10
Effect of Multiple Capacitors While Keeping Total Capacitance Constant
(power-ground pins at IC center)
12”
10”
Port1 (8,7)
(Ls 50nH)
Port2 (4,5)
(power pin)
εr =4.5
Decap
Ground pin
1 inch
The decap locations are 800mils from the power pin
• C=0.5uF
• ESL=0.5nH
• ESR=1Ω
11
Effect of Multiple Capacitors While Keeping Total Capacitance Constant
(power-ground pins at IC center)
12”
10”
Port1 (8,7)
(Ls 50nH)
Port2 (4,5)
(power pin) εr =4.5
Decap
Ground pin
1 inch
The decap locations are 800mils from the power pin
• C=0.25uF
• ESL=0.5nH
• ESR=1Ω
12
Constant Capacitance
800 mil Distance
13
Constant Capacitance
800 mil Distance
14
Effect of Capacitor Value??
• Need enough charge to supply need
• Depends on connection inductance
15
Noise Voltage is INDEPENDENT
of Amount of Capacitance!
As long as there is ‘enough’ chargeDist=400 mils
ESR=30mOhms
ESL=0.5nH
16
What Happens if a 2nd Decoupling
Capacitor is placed near the First
Capacitor?
Observation
Point
Via #1Via #2 Moved in arc
around Observation
point while
maintaining 500 mil
distance to
observation point
500
mils
distance
17
Second Via Around a circle
Port 2
Port 1
θ
( )yx,Port 3
( ) ( )( )
+
+
+
−
+
++
r
rd
rR
rd
d
rdr
rdrRd
2
12
2
3
2
1
2
ln
ln
4ln
4 π
µ
π
µ
2sin22
1
θRd
Rd
=
=
( )( )
+
+=
3
4
)2/sin(2ln
4 rrR
rRd
θπ
µ
1d
2dR
Port 2
Port 1
θ
( )yx,Port 3
( ) ( )( )
+
+
+
−
+
++
r
rd
rR
rd
d
rdr
rdrRd
2
12
2
3
2
1
2
ln
ln
4ln
4 π
µ
π
µ
2sin22
1
θRd
Rd
=
=
( )( )
+
+=
3
4
)2/sin(2ln
4 rrR
rRd
θπ
µ
1d
2dR
theta: angle as shown in the figure in
degree
d2: distance between Port 2 and Port 3
in mil
d1: distance between Port 3 and Port 1
in mil
d: thickness of dielectric layer in mil
r: radius for all ports in mil
R: distance between Port 1 and Port 2 in
mil
Courtesy of Jingook Kim,
Jun Fan, Jim Drewniak
Missouri University of
Science and Technology
18
Effective Inductance for Various Distances to Decoupling CapacitorWith Second Capacitor (Via) Equal Distance Around Circle
Plane Seperation = 35 mil -- Via Diameter = 20 mil
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
0 50 100 150 200
Angle (degrees)
Ind
uctn
ace (
pH
)
250 mil
500mil
750 mil
1000 mil
19
Effective Inductance for Various Distances to Decoupling CapacitorWith Second Capacitor (Via) Equal Distance Around Circle
Plane Seperation = 10 mil -- Via Diameter = 20 mil
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
0 50 100 150 200
Angle (degrees)
Ind
uc
tnac
e (
pH
)
500mil
250 mil
750 mil
1000 mil
20
Second Via Along Side
Port 2
Port 1
( )yx,
R
Port 3
1d
2d
2
2
2
1 dRd +=
Port 2
Port 1
( )yx,
R
Port 3
1d
2d
2
2
2
1 dRd +=
d2: distance between Port 2 and Port 3 in mil
d1: distance between Port 3 and Port 1 in mil
d: thickness of dielectric layer in mil
r: radius for all ports in mil
R: distance between Port 1 and Port 2 in mil
21
Effective Inductance for Various Distances to Decoupling CapacitorWith Second Capacitor (Via) Positioned Adjacent to First Capacitor
Plane Seperation = 35 mil -- Via Diameter = 20 mil
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
1400
1500
1600
1700
1800
1900
2000
2100
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Distance Between Capacitors (mils)
Ind
uctn
ace (
pH
)
500mil
250 mil
750 mil
1000 mil
22
Understanding Inductance Effects and Proximity
1 via
10mm
2 via with degree 30°°°°
2 via with degree 90°°°° 2 via with degree 180°°°°
20cm
20cm
10cm
10cm
23
Current Density
A/m2
[m]
[m]
A/m2
[m]
[m]
A/m2
[m]
[m]
A/m2
[m]
[m]
24
2mm
2 shorting with 30° 2 shorting with 180°
10cm
10cm
G-S probingport
Short Vias
°°°= 180,30,0θ
0.8mm
G-S probingport
Short Vias
Shorting via
1 shorting
DUT for Experimental Validation (Single Plane pair)
25
100
0.1
1
10
50 400
Frequency [MHz]
Imp
edan
ce [Ω
]
Measured Input Impedance
Experimental Validation (Single Plane Pair)
• Even in the case with two
shorting vias at opposite sides
(θ =180°), the inductance
value is 68.8% of that with
one shorting via
• As two shorting vias get
closer together, mutual
inductance between two
shorting vias increases.
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350500
550
600
650
700
750
800
850
900
1000
theta (degree)
To
tal
ind
uct
ance
[p
H]
with only 1 via (852pH)
with 2 via with 180°
(586H = 68.8% × 852pH)
with 2 vias with 30° (687pH)
Equation
( )( )
+
+3
4
)2/sin(2ln
4 rrR
rRd
θπ
µ
26
Multiple Capacitors
Decaps
GND
PWR
GND
PWR
Decaps
GND
PWR
GND
PWR
PWR_capGND_cap
GND
PWR
GND
PWR
Cavity1
Cavity2
Cavity3
Cavity4
PWR_capGND_cap
GND
PWR
GND
PWR
Cavity1
Cavity2
Cavity3
Cavity4
27
Via Spacing
Via Barrel 10 mils
60 mils
20 mils
10 mils*
9 mils9 mils
10 mils*
108 mils minimum
128 mils typical
Via Barrel 10 mils
60 mils
20 mils
10 mils*
9 mils9 mils
10 mils*
60 mils
20 mils
10 mils*
9 mils9 mils
10 mils*
108 mils minimum
128 mils typical
2.21.90.9540
1.91.60.7530
1.61.30.520
1.10.90.310
0603 SMT (nH)0402 SMT
(nH)
40 mil Spacing (nH)Distance to
Planes (mils)
28
Possible Configurations
Dense,
non-
alternating
Dense,
alternating
Spread,
non-
alternating
Spread,
alternating
Dense,
non-
alternating
Dense,
alternating
Spread,
non-
alternating
Spread,
alternating
29
Effective Inductance for 16 Decoupling Capacitors for Dense and Spread
Configurations and Plane Pair Depth
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Distance into PCB (mils)
Eff
ecti
ve I
nd
ucta
nce (
pH
)
Dense Non-Alternating
Dense Alternating
Spread Non-AlternatingSpread Alternating
40 mil via spacing
30
LDecap Convergence
50
mils
Regular
100
mils
AlternatingG
P
h
…Decaps modeled as a Short
Port
3800 4000 4200 4400 4600 4800 5000 5200
3800
4000
4200
4400
4600
4800
5000
5200
5400
Line
100
101
10-2
10-1
Number of Capacitors
[nH
]
Ldecap Comparison h=5mils
Line Alternating
Line Regular
1/n
0 10 20 30
0.05
0.1
0.15
Number of Capacitors
[nH
]
Ldecap Comparison h=5mils
Line Alternating
Line Regular
1/n
31
LDecap Convergence 0402 Size
50
mils
Regular
100
mils
Alternating
G
P
h=5mils
…Decaps modeled as a Short
Port
3800 4000 4200 4400 4600 4800 5000 5200
3800
4000
4200
4400
4600
4800
5000
5200
5400
Line
Line Horizontal
a
Line Vertical
101
10-3
10-2
10-1
Number of Capacitors
[nH
]
Ldecap Comparison h=5mils
Convention Alternating
Convention Regular
Line Horizontal
Line Vertical
32
LDecap Convergence 0402 Size
G
P
h=5mils
…Decaps modeled as a Short
Port
3800 4000 4200 4400 4600 4800 5000 5200
3800
4000
4200
4400
4600
4800
5000
5200
5400
Line
50
mils
Regular
100
mils
Alternating
Line Horizontal
a
Line Vertical
0 10 20 300
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.1
Number of Capacitors
[nH
]
Ldecap Comparison h=5mils
Convention Alternating
Convention Regular
Line Horizontal
Line Vertical
33
Observations
• Added via (capacitor) does not lower effective inductance to 70-75% of original single via case
• Thicker dielectric results in higher inductance
• Alternating PWR/GND can significantly reduce overall inductance
34
Effect of Plane width on Inductance
Case1 : 10 inches
Case2 : 5 inches
Case3 : 2 inches1 inch
Port1 Port2
35
Geometry Solid Plane
‘Capacitor’ Port‘IC’ Port (shorting via)
10 inches
12 inches
width
Solid Plane
‘Capacitor’ Port‘IC’ Port (shorting via)
10 inches
12 inches
width
‘IC’ Port (shorting via)
‘Capacitor’ Port
10 mils
‘IC’ Port (shorting via)
‘Capacitor’ Port
10 mils
Top View
Side View
36
Inductance as a Function of
Plane Width
25741
13522
7095
54510
Inductance
(pH)
Plane Width
(inches)
37
Inductance as a Function of
Plane Width
24065825741
16335513522
1561787095
15417354510
Inductance (pH)
(Distance=1”)
Inductance (pH)
(Distance=2”)
Inductance (pH)
(Distance=10”)
Plane
Width
(inches)
38
Plane Width & Current Density
39
Geometry for Case Studies – Via Map
IC
region
~300 mils
16 Capacitors are
placed, to maintain
the symmetry
12”
12”
100 mils
1.2 mil
1oz Cu
1.2 mil
1oz Cu
1.2 mil
1oz Cu
0.6 mil
0.5oz
0.6 mil
0.5oz Cu
Copper
thicknessDielectric
thickness
44 Layer3 mil
3 mil
3 mil
3.5 mil
3.5 mil
Signal Net Location
Reference Net
Possible Power net
Location
40
16 Decap
16 Decap
16 Decap
16 Decap
16 Decap
16 Decap
Power plane at mid
Top
dec
ap
son
lyB
ott
om
dec
ap
son
ly
Un
der
th
e IC
Power plane at top Power plane at bottom
Q1 & Q2. Location of Power Layer/CapsB
ott
om
dec
ap
son
ly
Aw
ay f
rom
th
e IC
IC 16 Decaps
IC
IC
IC 16 Decaps
IC
IC
IC 16 Decaps
IC
IC
Power Net under test Reference Net Floating Net40
41
PWR Layer Location – Results
Bottom Cap
Under the IC
ICTop Cap
Power
layer
IC
…
10-4
10-2
100
10-4
10-2
100
102
[GHz]
Ω
|Z11
| - Top Cap
Top
Mid
Bottom
10-4
10-2
100
10-4
10-2
100
102
[GHz]
Ω
|Z11
| - Bottom Caps - Under the IC
Top
Mid
Bottom
Power layer should be closest to the IC, to minimize IC
to power plane inductance.
Geometry
and
Currents
Geometry
and
Currents
Power plane at Top
Power plane Middle
Power plane Bottom
Power plane at Top
Power plane Middle
Power plane Bottom
42
10-4
10-2
100
10-4
10-2
100
102
[GHz]
Ω
|Z11
|- Top Pwr
Top Cap
Bottom Cap-Away
Bottom Cap- Under the IC
Cap Location Effect - Results
Top Cap
Bottom Cap
Away from IC
Bottom Cap
Under the IC
Power
layer
10-4
10-2
100
10-4
10-2
100
102
[GHz]
Ω
|Z11
| - Middle PWR
Top Cap
Bottom Cap-Away
Bottom Cap- Under the IC
IC
……
…
• The capacitors should to be placed on the side
closest to the power plane to reduce the inductance
from the capacitor to power plane.
• Capacitor location does not affect the high
frequency inductance.
4343
Q3. Effect of Ground Planes – Geometries
All ground planes With top nearby ground plane
With bottom nearby ground plane Only topmost and bottommost ground planes43
IC IC
IC IC
Intermediate GND
planes removed
Intermediate GND
planes removed
Intermediate
GND planes
removed
Intermediate
GND planes
removed
Intermediate
GND planes
removed
44
Effect of Ground Planes – Results
Top Cap
Power
layer
IC
…
10-4
10-2
100
10-4
10-2
100
102
[GHz]
Ω
|Z11
| - Top Cap
All GND Planes
Top Closest
Bottom Closest
Only Topmost & Bottommost
The closest ground plane from the power plane, is most important. Other Ground planes in the
stack up will not affect the Llow or Lhigh significantly.
Geometry and current path for no
GND plane case
Geometry
Geometry and current path for all
GND planes case
45
Power Integrity Analysis Summary
• Physical cause of inductance (current path) identified for each portion of overall path
• Value of capacitance not as important as number of capacitors
• Via connection configuration can dramatically influence inductance
• If power/Ground-reference planes deep in PCB stackup, capacitor placement has less impact than might be expected
46
Design Conclusions
• PWR/GND plane pair close to IC minimizes LIC
• Capacitors close to the power layer minimize the
inductance Ldecap from the capacitor to the power plane.
• PWR/GND plane separation small
• Placing Caps under the IC can benefit the design, if board is thin, or the plane inductance is large.
• Ground plane closest to the power layer affects the
response most, all other ground layer have very little influence.
• Ground vias for power return currents placed adjacent to the ground terminal of the capacitors reduces the
inductance in the current return path