Unit Planner and Assessment Guide Semester 2, 2017Year 12 Literature

Unit 4: Literary Interpretations 1.0

Table of ContentsUnit Planner and Assessment Guide Semester 2, 2017................................................................................1

Year 12 Literature..........................................................................................................................................1

BSSS unit outline and goals..............................................................................................................................1

Weekly Planner................................................................................................................................................2

Assessment Task 1 – In-class essay...................................................................................................................3

Assessment Task 2 – Check Point 1:.................................................................................................................4

Assessment Task 2 – Check Point 2:.................................................................................................................5

Assessment Task 2 – Check Point 3:.................................................................................................................6

Assessment Task 2 – final presentation:...........................................................................................................7

Appendix A...................................................................................................................................................8

Appendix B.................................................................................................................................................10

Appendix C.................................................................................................................................................12

Appendix D.................................................................................................................................................14

Appendix E..................................................................................................................................................16

BSSS unit outline and goalsUnit Description: Unit 4 develops students’ appreciation of the significance of literary study through close critical analysis of literary texts drawn from a range of forms, genres and styles. Students reflect upon the creative use of language, and the structural and stylistic features that shape meaning and influence response. The unit focuses on the dynamic nature of literary interpretation and considers the insights texts offer, their literary conventions and aesthetic appeal. Analytical responses demonstrate increasing independence in interpreting texts and synthesising a range of perspectives into critical and imaginative responses. In creating imaginative texts, students experiment with literary conventions and reflect on how the created text takes into account the expectations of audiences.

Specific Unit Goals:

Understand the relationship between the representation of values and ideas in texts and how they are received by audiences

Justify their own critical interpretations of a text Create oral, written and multimodal texts blending and borrowing conventions.

Course Structure:This unit will have 2 parts. The first will be a study of Julian Barnes’ novel, “A history of the world in 10 ½ chapters”.

The second part will bear more resemblance to an IB course where you will design, investigate and create a project that meets the general course requirements described above. This will allow you to personalise your learning and focus on a concept of particular interest to you, whilst investigating ‘Literary Interpretations’.

Suggested Areas of Focus: The portrayal of historical figures in literature like Richard III, Anne Boleyn, etc The interpretation and portrayal of Gothic elements. E.g. Vampires Texts that have been reimagined and adapted. E.g. Shakespeare’s ‘Romeo and Juliet’, Shelley’s

‘Frankenstein’, etc A genre study where you research the various interpretations of concepts: war, death, love, etc Representations of gender from a specific time period / changing nature of gender representations

from a specific genre (for example, Film Noir and the femme fatale) Various interpretations of a controversial text.

Please Note: Your chosen area of study cannot be on texts you have already studied in this or another senior English class.

Weekly PlannerWeek Assessment Weighting Description1 10 1/2 Chapters2 10 1/2 Chapters3 10 1/2 Chapters4 10 1/2 Chapters 5 In-class essay

(Responding) beginning Tues 15 August

30%

Note: From this point on, your assessment will be based on your research project. You will need to complete a range of tasks to focus your knowledge and understanding.67 Check Point #1: Written

Proposal Due (Responding) Fri 1 Sept

10% This will not only describe the topic you are proposing to focus on but argue how and why it meets the above requirements of the unit.

8 9 Check Point #2

Literature Review Due(Investigating) Mon 11 Sept

20% This will be an analysis of the existing research for your topic.

10 Year 12 Retreat11 Checkpoint #3 Oral report

on research and project progress. Clear identification of thesis topic and direction.(Responding) Tues 10 Oct

10% A 3 / 4 minute presentation on your thesis and direction of your project.You are encouraged to pose questions to audience to help focus your discussion.

1213 Project:

Persuasive or informative response (spoken or written) - Creative (30% weighting)Mon 23 Oct

30% Your final project may be submitted as a 2000-2500 word written response or as a 20-25 minute spoken presentation (or as negotiated).

1415 / 16 Exam block No exam

Assessment Task 1 – In-class essayConditions Relevant to Assessment – see Appendix A

In-class essay – 1200 wordsTo be written in class over 3 x 50 minute periods, beginning Tuesday 15 August 2017Answer ONE of the following questions:

1. It could be argued that nature is reasserting control of the world after thousands of years of destruction by mankind. Analyse this theory, referring closely to at least 2 of the stories in the novel.

2. Analyse the binary opposition of mankind versus the animal kingdom in your novel.3. Write a postcolonial or deconstructionist critique of at least 2 chapters of your novel.

Assessment Task 2 – Check Point 1:Conditions Relevant to Assessment – see Appendix B

Written Proposal: Friday Week 7 – 1 September 10%

This should be 400-500 words in length.

In this proposal you will identify the topic you wish to explore. At this stage, it may be quite general as you research widely in order to focus your ideas.

In your proposal you need to identify:

1. The topic in as narrow terms as you can.2. Which texts you believe will best support your proposal3. Proposed research and critical readings that you will need to explore4. Which particular literary features you believe will be the focus of your research – language, structural and

stylistic features, critical interpretations5. Values, attitudes and beliefs inherent6. How your text reflects the requirements of the unit, Literary Interpretations.

This proposal needs to be written in 3rd person using appropriate language and formality of tone. It is not expected that you use quotations or extensive research to support your ideas at this point.

Advanced Established Demonstrated Some Evidence Little EvidenceControl of form Sophisticated

control of form and awareness of audience and purpose

Well-developed control of form and awareness of audience and purpose

Developing control of form and awareness of audience and purpose

Partial control of form and awareness of audience and purpose

Insufficient evidence of control of form and awareness of audience and purpose

Originality of thought

Demonstrates independence and originality of thought.

Demonstrates some independence and originality of thought.

Evidence of a developing independent voice.

Relies on description or retelling.

Expresses simple ideas with heavy reliance on generalisations.

Command of the technical aspects of language.

Writes with vitality and control of language:SpellingGrammarSentence structureParagraphingWord choiceFormality of tone.

Writes with a well-developed control of language:SpellingGrammarSentence structureParagraphingWord choiceFormality of tone.

Developing control of language:SpellingGrammarSentence structureParagraphingWord choiceFormality of tone.

Partial control of language:SpellingGrammarSentence structureParagraphingWord choiceFormality of tone.

Lacks control of language:SpellingGrammarSentence structureParagraphingWord choiceFormality of tone.

Assessment Task 2 – Check Point 2:Conditions relevant to assessment – See Appendix C

Literature Review Monday Week 9 – 11 September 20%

This should be approximately 1000 words in length.

For this task, you are required to submit a critical analysis of the established literature on your project topic.

This is written as an essay. It describes, summarises, evaluates and considers the relevance to your topic of the literature available. It should be used as a tool to help define your topic.

A sample literature review will be provided for your use as a guide.

Advanced Established Demonstrated Some Evidence Little EvidenceControl of form Sophisticated

control of form and awareness of audience and purpose

Well-developed control of form and awareness of audience and purpose

Developing control of form and awareness of audience and purpose

Partial control of form and awareness of audience and purpose

Insufficient evidence of control of form and awareness of audience and purpose

Critical and analytical skills

Analyses, interprets, argues and evaluates with a high degree of insight.

Analyses, interprets, argues and evaluates effectively with insight.

Developing critical and analytical skills with some insight and justification of viewpoint.

Responds to research with occasional insight but limited justification and evaluation.

Understands simple and concrete ideas. Paraphrases and retells.

Originality of thought

Demonstrates independence and originality of thought.

Demonstrates some independence and originality of thought.

Evidence of a developing independent voice.

Relies on description or retelling.

Expresses simple ideas with heavy reliance on generalisations.

Command of the technical aspects of language.

Writes with vitality and control of language:SpellingGrammarSentence structureParagraphingWord choiceFormality of tone.

Writes with a well-developed control of language:SpellingGrammarSentence structureParagraphingWord choiceFormality of tone.

Developing control of language:SpellingGrammarSentence structureParagraphingWord choiceFormality of tone.

Partial control of language:SpellingGrammarSentence structureParagraphingWord choiceFormality of tone.

Lacks control of language:SpellingGrammarSentence structureParagraphingWord choiceFormality of tone.

Bibliography Highly developed application of conventions.

Well-developed application of conventions.

Developingapplication of conventions.

Limited application of conventions.

Incorrect or no application of conventions.

Assessment Task 2 – Check Point 3:Conditions Relevant to Assessment – see Appendix D

Oral report – 3-4 minutes Tuesday Week 11 – 10 October 10%

This is an informal spoken presentation on your research and project progress. You should, by now, be able to clearly identify your thesis topic and direction. In particular, you should identify concerns or problems that you have that you believe your audience may be able to help with.

It is expected that you will speak knowledgably and confidently on your topic. This is a prepared speech, not a general ad lib discussion. However, you are not being marked on your oral skills but on the information that is presented. This presentation, along with peer discussion, will be recorded for your use.

As a guideline, your written preparation will need to be 300-400 words.

Advanced Established Demonstrated Some Evidence Little EvidenceKnoweldge of text/ topic

Demonstrates extensive and comprehensive knowledge of text/topic.

Demonstrates substantial knowledge of text/topic.

Demonstrates knowledge of text/topic.

Demonstrates limited knowledge of text/topic.

Demonstrates flawed or superficial knowledge of text/topic.

Clarity and fluency of expression

Engages audience with a high degree of clarity and fluency of expression.

Engages audience with clarity and fluency of expression.

Some clarity and fluency of expression.

Limited clarity and fluency of expression.

Lacks clarity.No fluency of expression.

Assessment Task 2 – final presentation:Conditions Relevant to Assessment – see Appendix E

Written submission or spoken submission Monday Week 13 – 23 October 30%

This is the final stage of your literary project where you present your findings to your audience. You may present this as either a written or spoken piece.

Written – 2000 - 2500 words (or as negotiated)

Full bibliography required

Spoken – 20 minutes (or as negotiated)

Full bibliography required Visual support required

Appendix AYear 12 Literature – Semester 2 2017Unit 4 – Literary Interpretations 1.0In-class Response (Responding)Task Number 1

English Teacher: Ms WardDate Due: Week 5– beginning Tuesday 15 August 2017. To be held in class over 3 consecutive 50

minute lessons.Date Issued: Week 2 Word limit: 1200 words Weighting: 30%Marks: out of 100Criteria: As Literary Essay rubricConditions: This is an in-class task.

For further reference to the Marist College Canberra and BSSS policies please see https://portal.maristc.act.edu.au/StudentSpace/StudentPolicies/InformationRelatingToAssessmentInYears11And12.pdf

Late submission: If students are absent on any days of the in-class task, they must apply for an extension for the task through the Studies Office as per the information below before they can continue with the task.

For all students it is an expectation that assignment and other assessment tasks must be submitted (even if late) in order to fulfill course requirements. For late work the following policy will apply:

1. Except in exceptional circumstances, students must apply for an extension in advance, providing due cause and adequate documentary evidence for late submission.

2.a) Calculation of a notional zero in T units is based on items submitted on time or with an approved extension ( ie a genuine score).

2.b) A late penalty will apply unless an extension is granted. The penalty for late submission is 5% (of possible mark) per calendar day late (including weekends and public holidays) until the notional zero, calculated in a), is reached. If an item is more than 7 days late, it receives the notional zero. Submission of work on a weekend or public holiday is not acceptable.

3. The Principal has the right to exercise discretion in the application of the late penalty in special circumstances with satisfactory documentation.

4. It may not be possible to grade or score work submitted after marked work in a unit has been returned to other students.

Students should note that failure of computer/printer equipment is not considered due cause for late submission of work without penalty.

Internal Moderation: To ensure consistency, assessment items are moderated. Moderation in English follows this process: Class teacher marks all papers A sample (between 25 % and 100% of the class depending on the task and/or unit) is marked by

another senior teacher within the department. If further advice on papers is required, these should be referred to either the HoD or the Assistant

HoD, as applicable.

English Department Drafting Policy: English Department Drafting Policy: For seen questions, drafts will be accepted up to 1 week (5 school days) before the due date with conditions as per the English Department Drafting Policy.

Purpose of drafting:

The purpose of submitting a draft to your English classroom teacher is twofold:

1. to ensure that you are addressing the requirements of the assessment task question, and2. to receive suggestions as to how to improve your task response.

It should be noted that the purpose of drafting is not to edit your work or to give you an indication of any grade the work may achieve.

Submission of Draft Procedure:

One draft will be looked at by your classroom teacher and not by any other members of the English Department. Your draft may consist of either:

1. your essay plan with introduction and conclusion, or2. a full essay

Your draft needs to be submitted to your English classroom teacher for comment 5 or more days before the due date of the assessment task.

What you can expect for feedback:

Your teacher will return your draft to you within 2 school days of receiving the draft.

He/she will make either written or spoken comment on:

1. whether your task response addresses the task question2. a maximum of 3 areas in your response that need to be developed.

Your teacher may also offer general verbal comment on the technical aspect of your writing eg. paragraph or sentence structure, language, spelling or punctuation.

Your role in the drafting process:

The suggestions made to you by your classroom teacher are for your consideration and are not mandatory for inclusion. Submission of a draft for comment does not guarantee an improved mark.

It is recommended that students closely edit their own work before submission of assignments. Peer reading of written assessment and performance before peers for oral assessment are effective means of acquiring additional comment on how to improve.

Editing by reading work aloud will often highlight poor sentence structure, incorrect or omitted words and incorrect punctuation.

Appendix B

Year 12 Literature – Semester 2 2017Unit 4 – Literary Interpretations 1.0Written Proposal(Responding)Assessment Task 2 - Checkpoint 1

English Teacher: Ms Ward Date Due: Friday Week 7 – 1 SeptemberDate Issued: Week 2Word limit: 400-500 wordsWeighting: 10%Marks: out of 100Criteria: As per rubricConditions: This is a take home task. A Statement of Originality (BSSS Plagiarism Declaration) must be

attached to your submissionFor further reference to the Marist College Canberra and BSSS policies on plagiarism please see

https://portal.maristc.act.edu.au/StudentSpace/StudentPolicies/InformationRelatingToAssessmentInYears11And12.pdf

Late submission: Extensions must be applied for before the due date through the Studies Office.

For all students it is an expectation that assignment and other assessment tasks must be submitted (even if late) in order to fulfill course requirements. For late work the following policy will apply:

1. Except in exceptional circumstances, students must apply for an extension in advance, providing due cause and adequate documentary evidence for late submission.

2.a) Calculation of a notional zero in T units is based on items submitted on time or with an approved extension ( ie a genuine score).

2.b) A late penalty will apply unless an extension is granted. The penalty for late submission is 5% (of possible mark) per calendar day late (including weekends and public holidays) until the notional zero, calculated in a), is reached. If an item is more than 7 days late, it receives the notional zero. Submission of work on a weekend or public holiday is not acceptable.

3. The Principal has the right to exercise discretion in the application of the late penalty in special circumstances with satisfactory documentation.

4. It may not be possible to grade or score work submitted after marked work in a unit has been returned to other students.

Students should note that failure of computer/printer equipment is not considered due cause for late submission of work without penalty

.Internal Moderation: To ensure consistency, assessment items are moderated. Moderation in English follows this process:

Class teacher marks all papers A sample (between 25 % and 100% of the class depending on the task and/or unit) is marked by

another senior teacher within the department. If further advice on papers is required, these should be referred to either the HoD or the Assistant

HoD, as applicable.

English Department Drafting Policy:

Purpose of drafting:

The purpose of submitting a draft to your English classroom teacher is twofold:

3. to ensure that you are addressing the requirements of the assessment task question, and4. to receive suggestions as to how to improve your task response.

It should be noted that the purpose of drafting is not to edit your work or to give you an indication of any grade the work may achieve.

Submission of Draft Procedure:

One draft will be looked at by your classroom teacher and not by any other members of the English Department. Your draft may consist of either:

1. your essay plan with introduction and conclusion, or2. a full essay

Your draft needs to be submitted to your English classroom teacher for comment 5 or more days before the due date of the assessment task.

What you can expect for feedback:

Your teacher will return your draft to you within 2 school days of receiving the draft.

He/she will make either written or spoken comment on:

1. whether your task response addresses the task question2. a maximum of 3 areas in your response that need to be developed.

Your teacher may also offer general verbal comment on the technical aspect of your writing eg. paragraph or sentence structure, language, spelling or punctuation.

Your role in the drafting process:

The suggestions made to you by your classroom teacher are for your consideration and are not mandatory for inclusion. Submission of a draft for comment does not guarantee an improved mark.

It is recommended that students closely edit their own work before submission of assignments. Peer reading of written assessment and performance before peers for oral assessment are effective means of acquiring additional comment on how to improve.

Editing by reading work aloud will often highlight poor sentence structure, incorrect or omitted words and incorrect punctuation.

Appendix C

Year 12 Literature – Semester 2 2017Unit 4 – Literary Interpretations 1.0Literature Review (Investigating)Assessment Task 2 – Checkpoint 2

English Teacher: Ms WardDate Due: Monday Week 9 – 11 SeptemberDate Issued: Week 2Word limit: 1000 words Weighting: 20%Marks: out of 100Criteria: As per rubricConditions: This is a written essay. This is a take home task. A Statement of Originality (BSSS Plagiarism

Declaration) must be attached to your submission.For further reference to the Marist College Canberra and BSSS policies on plagiarism please see https://portal.maristc.act.edu.au/StudentSpace/StudentPolicies/InformationRelatingToAssessmentInYears11And12.pdf

Late submission: Extensions must be applied for before the due date through the Studies Office.

For all students it is an expectation that assignment and other assessment tasks must be submitted (even if late) in order to fulfill course requirements. For late work the following policy will apply:

1. Except in exceptional circumstances, students must apply for an extension in advance, providing due cause and adequate documentary evidence for late submission.

2.a) Calculation of a notional zero in T units is based on items submitted on time or with an approved extension ( ie a genuine score).

2.b) A late penalty will apply unless an extension is granted. The penalty for late submission is 5% (of possible mark) per calendar day late (including weekends and public holidays) until the notional zero, calculated in a), is reached. If an item is more than 7 days late, it receives the notional zero. Submission of work on a weekend or public holiday is not acceptable.

3. The Principal has the right to exercise discretion in the application of the late penalty in special circumstances with satisfactory documentation.

4. It may not be possible to grade or score work submitted after marked work in a unit has been returned to other students.

Students should note that failure of computer/printer equipment is not considered due cause for late submission of work without penalty.

Internal Moderation: To ensure consistency, assessment items are moderated. Moderation in English follows this process: Class teacher marks all papers A sample (between 25 % and 100% of the class depending on the task and/or unit) is marked by

another senior teacher within the department. If further advice on papers is required, these should be referred to either the HoD or the Assistant

HoD, as applicable.

English Department Drafting Policy: English Department Drafting Policy: For seen questions, drafts will be accepted up to 1 week (5 school days) before the due date with conditions as per the English Department Drafting Policy.

Purpose of drafting:

The purpose of submitting a draft to your English classroom teacher is twofold:

1. to ensure that you are addressing the requirements of the assessment task question, and2 to receive suggestions as to how to improve your task response.

It should be noted that the purpose of drafting is not to edit your work or to give you an indication of any grade the work may achieve.

Submission of Draft Procedure:

One draft will be looked at by your classroom teacher and not by any other members of the English Department. Your draft may consist of either:

1. your essay plan with introduction and conclusion, or2. a full essay

Your draft needs to be submitted to your English classroom teacher for comment 5 or more days before the due date of the assessment task.

What you can expect for feedback:

Your teacher will return your draft to you within 2 school days of receiving the draft.

He/she will make either written or spoken comment on:

1. whether your task response addresses the task question2. a maximum of 3 areas in your response that need to be developed.

Your teacher may also offer general verbal comment on the technical aspect of your writing eg. paragraph or sentence structure, language, spelling or punctuation.

Your role in the drafting process:

The suggestions made to you by your classroom teacher are for your consideration and are not mandatory for inclusion. Submission of a draft for comment does not guarantee an improved mark.

It is recommended that students closely edit their own work before submission of assignments. Peer reading of written assessment and performance before peers for oral assessment are effective means of acquiring additional comment on how to improve.

Editing by reading work aloud will often highlight poor sentence structure, incorrect or omitted words and incorrect punctuation.

Appendix D

Year 12 Literature – Semester 2 2017Unit 4 – Literary Interpretations 1.0Oral Report(Responding)Assessment Task 2 - Checkpoint 3

English Teacher: Ms Ward Date Due: Tuesday Week 11 –10 OctoberDate Issued: Week 2Word limit: 3-4 minutesWeighting: 10%Marks: out of 10Criteria: As per rubricConditions: This is a spoken task which should be prepared at home. Notes are permitted.

For further reference to the Marist College Canberra and BSSS policies on plagiarism please see

https://portal.maristc.act.edu.au/StudentSpace/StudentPolicies/InformationRelatingToAssessmentInYears11And12.pdf

Late submission: Extensions must be applied for before the due date through the Studies Office.

For all students it is an expectation that assignment and other assessment tasks must be submitted (even if late) in order to fulfill course requirements. For late work the following policy will apply:

1. Except in exceptional circumstances, students must apply for an extension in advance, providing due cause and adequate documentary evidence for late submission.

2.a) Calculation of a notional zero in T units is based on items submitted on time or with an approved extension ( ie a genuine score).

2.b) A late penalty will apply unless an extension is granted. The penalty for late submission is 5% (of possible mark) per calendar day late (including weekends and public holidays) until the notional zero, calculated in a), is reached. If an item is more than 7 days late, it receives the notional zero. Submission of work on a weekend or public holiday is not acceptable.

3. The Principal has the right to exercise discretion in the application of the late penalty in special circumstances with satisfactory documentation.

4. It may not be possible to grade or score work submitted after marked work in a unit has been returned to other students.

Students should note that failure of computer/printer equipment is not considered due cause for late submission of work without penalty

.Internal Moderation: To ensure consistency, assessment items are moderated. Moderation in English follows this process:

Class teacher marks all papers A sample (between 25 % and 100% of the class depending on the task and/or unit) is marked by

another senior teacher within the department. If further advice on papers is required, these should be referred to either the HoD or the Assistant

HoD, as applicable.

English Department Drafting Policy:

Purpose of drafting:

The purpose of submitting a draft to your English classroom teacher is twofold:

3. to ensure that you are addressing the requirements of the assessment task question, and4. to receive suggestions as to how to improve your task response.

It should be noted that the purpose of drafting is not to edit your work or to give you an indication of any grade the work may achieve.

Submission of Draft Procedure:

One draft will be looked at by your classroom teacher and not by any other members of the English Department. Your draft may consist of either:

1. your essay plan with introduction and conclusion, or2. a full essay

Your draft needs to be submitted to your English classroom teacher for comment 5 or more days before the due date of the assessment task.

What you can expect for feedback:

Your teacher will return your draft to you within 2 school days of receiving the draft.

He/she will make either written or spoken comment on:

1. whether your task response addresses the task question2. a maximum of 3 areas in your response that need to be developed.

Your teacher may also offer general verbal comment on the technical aspect of your writing eg. paragraph or sentence structure, language, spelling or punctuation.

Your role in the drafting process:

The suggestions made to you by your classroom teacher are for your consideration and are not mandatory for inclusion. Submission of a draft for comment does not guarantee an improved mark.

It is recommended that students closely edit their own work before submission of assignments. Peer reading of written assessment and performance before peers for oral assessment are effective means of acquiring additional comment on how to improve.

Editing by reading work aloud will often highlight poor sentence structure, incorrect or omitted words and incorrect punctuation.

Appendix E

Year 12 Literature – Semester 2 2017Unit 4 – Literary Interpretations 1.0Creative Response – Persuasive or Informative written or spoken presentation(Creating)Task Number 2

English Teacher: Ms WardDate Due: Week 13 – Monday 23 OctoberDate Issued: Week 2 Word limit: 2000-2500 words written or 20 minutes spoken (or as negotiated)Weighting: 30%Marks: out of 100Criteria: As per rubricConditions: This is a take home task. A Statement of Originality (BSSS Plagiarism Declaration) must be

attached to your submissionFor further reference to the Marist College Canberra and BSSS policies on plagiarism please see

https://portal.maristc.act.edu.au/StudentSpace/StudentPolicies/InformationRelatingToAssessmentInYears11And12.pdf

Late submission: Extensions must be applied for before the due date through the Studies Office.For all students it is an expectation that assignment and other assessment tasks must be submitted (even if late) in order to fulfill course requirements. For late work the following policy will apply:

1. Except in exceptional circumstances, students must apply for an extension in advance, providing due cause and adequate documentary evidence for late submission.

2.a) Calculation of a notional zero in T units is based on items submitted on time or with an approved extension ( ie a genuine score).

2.b) A late penalty will apply unless an extension is granted. The penalty for late submission is 5% (of possible mark) per calendar day late (including weekends and public holidays) until the notional zero, calculated in a), is reached. If an item is more than 7 days late, it receives the notional zero. Submission of work on a weekend or public holiday is not acceptable.

3. The Principal has the right to exercise discretion in the application of the late penalty in special circumstances with satisfactory documentation.

4. It may not be possible to grade or score work submitted after marked work in a unit has been returned to other students.

Students should note that failure of computer/printer equipment is not considered due cause for late submission of work without penalty.

Internal Moderation: To ensure consistency, assessment items are moderated. Moderation in English follows this process: Class teacher marks all papers A sample (between 25 % and 100% of the class depending on the task and/or unit) is marked by

another senior teacher within the department. If further advice on papers is required, these should be referred to either the HoD or the Assistant

HoD, as applicable.

English Department Drafting Policy:

Purpose of drafting:

The purpose of submitting a draft to your English classroom teacher is twofold:

1. to ensure that you are addressing the requirements of the assessment task question, and2. to receive suggestions as to how to improve your task response.

It should be noted that the purpose of drafting is not to edit your work or to give you an indication of any grade the work may achieve.

Submission of Draft Procedure:

One draft will be looked at by your classroom teacher and not by any other members of the English Department. Your draft may consist of either:

1. your essay plan with introduction and conclusion, or2. a full essay

Your draft needs to be submitted to your English classroom teacher for comment 5 or more days before the due date of the assessment task.

What you can expect for feedback:

Your teacher will return your draft to you within 2 school days of receiving the draft.

He/she will make either written or spoken comment on:

1. whether your task response addresses the task question2. a maximum of 3 areas in your response that need to be developed.

Your teacher may also offer general verbal comment on the technical aspect of your writing eg. paragraph or sentence structure, language, spelling or punctuation.

Your role in the drafting process:

The suggestions made to you by your classroom teacher are for your consideration and are not mandatory for inclusion. Submission of a draft for comment does not guarantee an improved mark.

It is recommended that students closely edit their own work before submission of assignments. Peer reading of written assessment and performance before peers for oral assessment are effective means of acquiring additional comment on how to improve.

Editing by reading work aloud will often highlight poor sentence structure, incorrect or omitted words and incorrect punctuation.