bu - wellesely igem 2011 world finals

42

Upload: consuelo-valdes

Post on 06-May-2015

98 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals
Page 2: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Challenges

data

design deployment trial & error

time management

debugging

iterative design

com

ple

xity

manual error

standardization

sharing

automation

integration

specification high throughput

initial research

verification

speed

accuracy

Page 3: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Apply engineering principles to synthetic biology by utilizing user-centered design to build software tools that foster collaborative problem solving, support complex system design, and enable automation in the lab.

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Our Vision

Page 4: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Workflow

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Page 5: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

User Centered Design

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Page 6: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Preliminary User Studies

Position #

PIs 9

Postdocs 6

Industry Researchers 2

Student Researchers 12

Research Assistant 2

Master Student 1

Total 32

Goal Design requirements for synthetic biologists

Interview Procedure

1 hour interviews in laboratories

Interview Questions

Procedure walk-through Research goals Work practices Computational tools Future of the field

Data collection

Video Voice recordings Screenshots Observations

Qualitative Methods

• Affinity diagrams • Iterative coding

Institutions

• Boston University • Harvard Medical School • MIT • Wellesley College • Wyss Institute

Page 7: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Findings: User Study Results

BU - Wellesley Software

Page 8: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Findings: User Study Results

Alleviate Data Explosion

Integrate Workflow

Provide Multiple Forms of Evidence

Support from Novice to Expert

Facilitate Collaboration

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Page 9: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Findings: User Study Results

Alleviate Data Explosion

Integrate Workflow

Provide Multiple Forms of Evidence

Support from Novice to Expert

Facilitate Collaboration

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Page 10: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

“ ” By taking into account the collaborative process, tabletop software can help novices learn from

experts, making an invaluable impact on synthetic biology

-Natalie Kuldell, SynBERC

Page 11: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Optimus Primer

Multiplatform collaborative primer designer

Facilitates transition from novice to expert

Page 12: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Teaching Primer Design

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Page 13: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Low-Fidelity Prototype

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Page 14: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

G-nome Surfer Pro & Optimus Primer

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Page 15: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Evaluation

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

1. Usability of concrete interaction techniques 12 users

2. Usefulness for collaborative learning 20 users

3. Impact of an end-to-end solution iGEM 2012 wet lab team Advanced Biology seminar in Wellesley College

Page 16: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Evaluating Usefulness

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Intermediate College-level Neuroscience Lab &

Synthetic Biology Lab at BU

Page 17: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Results

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Men

tal D

eman

d

Ph

ysic

al D

eman

d

Tem

po

ral D

em

and

Per

form

ance

Co

nfi

den

ce

Eff

ort

Co

mp

lexi

ty

Dif

ficu

lty

En

joym

ent

Fru

stra

tio

n

Sco

re

NASA TLX & Engagement

0

1

2

3

4

5

Mu

tual

Un

der

stan

din

g

Dia

log

ue

Info

Po

olin

g

Rea

chin

g C

on

sen

sus

Tas

k D

ivis

ion

Tim

e M

anag

emen

t

Rec

ipro

cate

Inte

ract

ion

s

Ind

ivid

ual

Tas

k O

rien

tati

on

Sco

re

Collaborative Learning

Page 18: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

G-nome Surfer Pro reduces subjective workload, improves collaboration, encourages reflection, and facilitates intuitive interaction.

Findings

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Page 19: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Using Gnome Surfer in the Lab

Gnome Surfer Pro Pubmed research on Tuberculosis Gene selection from TB genome Sequence analysis Tuberculosis Genes

Rv2324 Rv3574 Rv3574 promoter Rv0324 Other genes Smeg6038 Smeg6042 Cre Dre Flp

Page 20: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Designing Primers

Optimus Primer Designed primers to amplify TB genes and generate BioBricks A subset of our primers is listed below

Genes Forward Primers Reverse Primers

RV2324 CGGCCGCTTCTAGATGGACCGCCTGGATGACACC CGGCCTACTAGTACTAGGGCGGCATGCGGTCG

Smeg6038 CGCCCGCTTCTAGAGCGGGGTGACCCTTTCTCTTC CCGCTACTAGTATGAATTGCCTCCCGGATCG

RV3574 GGCCGCTTCTAGAGCTTGCAGACCTCCGCGTCGA GGCCGCTACTAGTATTTCATGACCGCGCGAGGTG

RV0324 CGCGCGCTTCTAGATGGCTGGACAGTCCGATCG CGCCTGTAGATTCGCCGATGCCGTGGATA

RV3574 CGCCCGCTTCTAGATGGCGGTACTTGCCGAGTC TCGATGCGGCTGAACTCCCGACCCAGCGCCGAC

Smeg_6042 CGCGCTTCTAGATGACCAACGTGGCGGTTCTC CGATGCGTTCGAACTCGCGTCCGAGTGCCGAG

Page 21: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Synbio: General outlook • Biology is...

• Want to investigate complex interactions between genes

• Avoid large number of constructs

• Create sophisticated genetic circuits

• Generate a large state space

Page 22: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Trumpet: Configurable constructs • Can we build a configurable biological construct?

• Prior work

• Ham et al. five-state machine (2009)

• Friedland et al. three-state counter (2008)

• Our goal: a fully permutable construct

• Results:

• Two algorithms for designing such constructs

Page 23: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Part

Part

Invertase

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Invertases

Page 24: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Trumpet: Configurable constructs • Two design algorithms:

• Pancake and Linksort

• Pancake operations

• Bring to head (BtH)

• Push into place (PiP)

• Complexity

• invertases, operations

• Implemented with nested invertase sites

• BtH: One site per part

• PiP: N sites per part

Page 25: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Trumpet generated designs

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Link Sort

Pancake

Page 26: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Trumpet

Trumpet produces a permutable design using invertases

Page 27: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Trumpet

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Page 28: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Invertase –sites Flp – frt

Dre – rox Cre – lox

Trumpet Generated a reconfigurable circuit with 2 TB genes and 3 invertase sites

Generating a Circuit Design with Trumpet

Page 29: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

PuppetShow:

• 10 part BioBrick using current

software:

•200 lines of code

• 10 part Biobrickusing

PuppetShow:

•~ 20 lines

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Define protocols Call function Robot moves

Page 30: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

PuppetShow: features

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

• Define protocols and assembly programs

• Generates Puppeteer code automatically

• Optimizes labware allocation

• Saves samples and protocol history to database

• Maintains Puppeteer Protocol Repository

Page 31: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

PuppetShow: Workflow Spec

Plan

Protocol

Macro

Instruction

Action

Robot #1 Ligation

volume: 17µL Colonies: 300+

Robot #2 Ligation

volume: 16.7µL Colonies: 300+

Manual Side-by-Side

Ligation Volume: 20µL Colonies: 300+

Page 32: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

eLabNotebook

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Page 33: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

PuppetShow & eLabNotebook

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Page 34: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Assembling DNA with PuppetShow

Puppet Show Run protocols for the DNA assembly of the genetic circuit using a liquid handling robot

Manual Lab Work Do the protocols manually to build the genetic circuit

M: MW Ladder 1: Uncut BioBrick 2: Manual trial 3-5: Robot trials

Page 35: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Future Work & Conclusion

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Page 36: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Impact • Feasible to streamline experimental process through a suite of tools

• Facilitates collaborative learning support of novice users

• Developed and automated 2 different algorithms which place invertase sites through Clotho.

• Created user-friendly interface for automating protocols to a robot

• Successfully tested in the wet lab

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

The user interface is limiting in many fields. Designing software for synthetic biology with collaborative and

educational capabilities will help attract new blood to the field and provide those in the field with vital new design

perspectives. -George M. Church,

Harvard Medical School

“ ”

Page 37: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Acknowledgements BU: Daniel Dwyer, Jim Collins, and the Collins Lab, Andrew Krueger, James Galagan, and the Galagan Lab, Gretchen

Fougere, Assistant Dean of Outreach and Diversity

BBN Technologies: Aaron Aadler

JBEI: Josh Gilmore

JHU: Jef Boeke, Noah Young

MIT: Jonathan Babb and the Weiss Lab, Tiffany Huang, Louis Lamia and the MIT iGEM Team, Joy, Leanna, Paul, Shawn, and Shirley of the MIT iGEM team of 2010

Somerville High School: Chris Angelli

UC Berkeley: J. Christopher Anderson

Wellesley College: Catherine Summa, Wellesley College Science Center Summer Research, Yui Suzuki and the

Suzuki Lab

Wyss Institute: Avi Robinson-Mosher

Page 38: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals
Page 39: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Surface

Strengths

• Facilitates collaboration

• Promotes hands-on learning

• Education

• Tangible interface facilitates spatial organization of information

• Interface geared for novice researchers

Weaknesses

• Low-resolution display limits visualization capabilities

• Expensive

• Large footprint

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Page 40: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Evaluating Problem Solving

• Quantitative measures

– Number and value of insights

– time per activity

– subjective workload

– attitude

– physical and verbal participation

– equality of participation

• Qualitative indicators

– collaboration style

– problem-solving strategy

– nature of discussion

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Page 41: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

Feedback from Users

BU-Wellesley Software 2011

Our discussions were able to get further with the help of the G-nome Surfer.

G-nome Surfer contributed most to my satisfaction because while I usually prefer to work alone, the teamwork felt effortless, natural, and fun.

G-nome Surfer really helped in examining the strengths and weaknesses of your own hypothesis with those of others in the group. Being able to see and compare researched data side-by-side was particularly useful.

It was very helpful in the sense that information was very easy to find and could be organized into places that are easily seen and used.

Page 42: BU - Wellesely iGEM 2011 World Finals

G-nome Surfer vs GSP

BU-Wellesley Software 2011