bucks creek relicensing project ferc project no. 619 ...€¦ · overview of large wood documented...
TRANSCRIPT
Bucks Creek Relicensing ProjectFERC Project No. 619
Ramping, Gravel, Large Woody Material, Instream Flows
June 7, 2017
2
Agenda and Safety9:30 – 9:45 pm Safety, Introductions and Agenda review9:45 – 10:45 am Ramping Rate Follow-Up Discussion10:45 – 11:45 am Gravel
Review spawning gravel data in Bucks Creek and Milk Ranch CreekLarge Wood Overview of large wood documented in Project streams and reservoirs and Licensees
current management practices Follow up Questions and Discussion
11:45 am – 12:45 pm LUNCH
12:45 – 1:45 pm Flow Scenario Discussion Agencies Instream Flow Scenario for Grizzly Creek
1:45 – 2:45 pm Licensees’ Instream Flow Scenario for Bucks and Grizzly Creeks (all water year types)
2:45 – 3:15 pmScheduling and Process Check-In June 14 June 15 June 29 June 30
3:15 – 3:30 pm Wrap-up
3
RAMPING RATES
4
5
6
Gravel
7
Results – Grizzly Creek
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Percent Gradient
Elev
atio
n (ft
)
River MileBarrier Potential Barrier
Dam
Pedestrian Aerial Pedestrian Aerial Pedestrian
Wildcat Cr.
French Hotel Cr.
Foreman Cr.
NFFR
8
Grizzly Creek Spawning Gravel – by River Mile
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
0‐1 1‐2 2‐3 3‐4 4‐5 5‐6 6‐7 7‐7.4
Est. Num
ber o
f RBT
Red
ds
Spaw
ning
Gravel A
vail. Per m
i. (ft2)
River Mile
Spawning Gravel Avail. (2014/2015) Spawning Gravel Avail. (1989)Cum. Est. Number of RBT Redds (2014/2015) Cum. Est. Number of RBT Redds (1989)Est. Number of RBT Redds (2014/2015) Est. Number of RBT Redds (1989)
N.D N.DN.D
Assumes x̄ redd size of 2.15 ft2
9
Grizzly Creek Spawning Gravel – by Sub-Basin
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
G10 G9 G7 G5 G3 G1
0 ‐ 1.2 1.2 ‐ 2.7 2.7 ‐ 3.5 3.5 ‐ 4.1 4.1 ‐ 5.6 5.6 ‐ 7.4
Est. Num
ber o
f RBT
Red
ds
Spaw
ning
Gravel A
vail. (ft2)
Sub‐Basin & River Mile
Spawning Gravel Est. (2014/2015) Spawning Gravel Est. (1989)
Cum. Est. No. of RBT Redds (2014/2015) Cum. Est. No. of RBT Redds (1989)
Est. No. of RBT Redds (2014/2015) Est. No. of RBT Redds (1989)
N.D. N.D.
Assumes x̄ redd size of 2.15 ft2
10
Grizzly Creek Spawning Gravel Distribution
Spawning Gravel by River Mile (1989)River Mile Spawning Gravel Avail. Percent of Total
0–1 2,254 42%1–2 1,140 21%2–3 757 14%3–4 496 9%4–5 414 8%5–6 173 3%6–7 120 2%7–7.5 54 1%Total 5,394 100%
11
Grizzly Creek Spawning Gravel Distribution
Spawning Gravel by Sub-Basin (1989)Sub-Basin Length (mi) Percent of Total
G10 1.25 49%
G9 1.49 28%
G7 0.81 5%
G5 0.63 6%
G3 1.50 9%
G1 1.84 3%
Total 7.50 100%
12
Bucks Creek
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Percent GradientEl
evat
ion
(ft)
River MileBarrier Potential Barrier
Dam
Pedestrian Aerial Pedestrian
NFFR
13
Bucks Creek Spawning Gravel – by River Mile
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
0‐1 1‐2 6‐7
Est. Num
ber o
f RBT
Red
ds
Spaw
ning
Gravel A
vail. Per m
i. (ft2)
River Mile
Spawning Gravel Avail. (2014/2015) Cum. Est. No. of RBT Redds (2014/2015)
Est. No. of RBT Redds (2014/2015)
Assumes x̄ redd size of 2.15 ft2
** Spawning gravel data was not collected during the 1989 surveys in Bucks Creek
14
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
B5 B4 B3 B2 B1
0 ‐ 1.6 1.6 ‐ 3.5 3.5 ‐ 4.8 4.8 ‐ 6.1 6.1 ‐ 7.4
Est. Num
ber o
f RBT
Red
ds
Spaw
ning
Gravel A
vail. (ft2)
Sub‐Basin & River Mile
Spawning Gravel Avail. (2014/2015) Cum. Est. No. of RBT Redds (2014/2015)
Spawning Gravel Avail. (2014/2015)
Assumes x ̄redd size of 2.15 ft2
Bucks Creek Spawning Gravel – by Sub-Basin
N.D.
** Spawning gravel data was not collected during the 1989 surveys in Bucks Creek
15
Milk Ranch Creek
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
0 1 2 3 4
Percent GradientEl
evat
ion
(ft)
River MileBarrier Potential Barrier
Dam
Pedestrian Aerial Pedestrian
NFFR
16
Milk Ranch Creek Spawning Gravel – by River Mile
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
0‐0.6 3‐3.6
M3
Est. Num
ber o
f RBT
Red
ds
Spaw
ning
Gravel A
vail. (ft2)
Sub‐Basin & River Mile
Spawning Gravel Avail. (2014/2015) Spawning Gravel Avail. (1989)
Est. No. of RBT Redds (2014/2015) Est. No. of RBT Redds (1989)
N.D.
Assumes x ̄redd size of 2.15 ft2
17
Large Woody Material
Grizzly Forebay – 93 cfs
18
Large Woody Material
• Bucks and Milk Ranch Creeks -Highest Amount of LWM
• Grizzly Creek Lowest Amount of LWM
• Upper Stream Reaches Have More LWM than Lower Reaches
StreamSegment ground mapped
Stream distance
mapped (mi)
Volume (ft3/hectare)
Abundance(No./100m)
Milk Ranch Creek
Total Reach 0.6 9,677 25.9
Upper Reach 0.23 43,889 24.8
Lower Reach 0.36 3,622 29.6
Bucks Creek
Total Reach 2.73 12,706 32.3
Upper Reach 0.86 46,290 34.9
Lower Reach 1.87 4,026 26.9
Grizzly Creek
Total Reach 2.81 3,558 3.9
Upper Reach 0.73 3,289 2.2
Middle Reach 0.72 2,299 3.9
Lower Reach 1.36 1,852 4.9
19
PM&E – LWM Passage
Measure: Continue current practice of passing LWM over Lower Bucks Lake and Grizzly Forebay dams
– Along with the channel maintenance flows, increases delivery of LWM to the downstream reaches
20
PM&E – Channel Maintenance Flows
Measure: Continue to implement channel maintenance flows downstream of Lower Bucks Lake and Grizzly Forebay dams (per License Article 13 [FERC 2006b]):
– Releases of 50 (Grizzly) and 70 (Bucks) cfs in March if a natural spill in excess of the 50-70 cfs has not occurred in the previous 18 months
– May be accomplished by any combination of release, spill, and accretion flow
– During Normal and Wet years
21
Discussion – Large Woody Material - Sediment
22
Instream Flow: Bucks and Grizzly Creeks
“Grizzly Migration Barrier”
23
Grizzly Creek Model Scenarios 3CD (Critically Dry)
• Adapted from Scenario #3N
• Lower monthly maxWUA target (70%) than Normal Year
• Fry/Juv/Adult Rainbow monthly average over 80% maxWUA river-wide (82%)
• Achieved average of 82% maxWUA over all sub-basins, months, and life stages (including spawning)
• Same as FLA flows
24
Grizzly Creek Model Scenarios 3D (Dry)
• Same monthly maxWUA target (80%) as Normal Year for Fry/Juv/Adult, lower for spawning
• Fry/Juv/Adult Rainbow monthly average over 80% maxWUA river-wide (86%)
• Achieved average of 85% maxWUA over all sub-basins, months, and life stages (including spawning)
• Intermediate between CD and Normal Year flows
25
Grizzly Creek Model Scenario 3W (Wet)
• Same release flows as Normal Year
• Juv/Adult Rainbow monthly average over 80% maxWUA river-wide (87%)
• Achieved average of 85% maxWUA over all sub-basins, months, and life stages (including spawning)
• WUA for spawning and other life stages showed marginal or no improvement with higher flows due to high accretion in a wet year
26
Scenario 3CD/D/N Output: Grizzly Creek RBT Adults
27
Grizzly Creek Model Scenario 3 Summary
SummaryMonth 3‐CD 3‐D 3‐N 3‐WJanuary 4 4 4 4February 4 4 4 4March 4 8 12 12April 4 8 14 14May 8 8 12 12June 8 8 9 9July 6 7 9 9August 6 7 9 9September 6 7 9 9October 6 7 9 9November 4 5 9 9December 4 4 4 4
28
Bucks Creek Model Scenario 3CD (Critically Dry)
• Adapted from Scenario #3N
• Lower monthly Juv/Adult maxWUA target (75-80%, depending on month) than Normal Year
• Fry/Juv/Adult Rainbow monthly average over 80% maxWUA river-wide (87%)
• Achieved average of 85% maxWUA over all sub-basins, months, and life stages (including spawning)
• Same as FLA flows
29
Bucks Creek Model Scenario 3D (Dry)
• Higher Juv/Adult monthly maxWUA target (80%) than CD Year
• Fry/Juv/Adult Rainbow monthly average over 80% maxWUA river-wide (87%)
• Achieved average of 85% maxWUA over all sub-basins, months, and life stages (including spawning)
• Intermediate between CD and Normal Year flows
30
Bucks Creek Model Scenario 3W (Wet)
• Same release flows as Normal Year, except for small increase during March-May for spawning
• Juv/Adult Rainbow monthly average over 80% maxWUA river-wide (87%)
• Achieved average of 85% maxWUA over all sub-basins, months, and life stages (including spawning)
• WUA for spawning and other life stages showed marginal or no improvement with higher flows due to high accretion in a wet year
31
Scenario 3CD/D/N Output: Bucks Creek RBT Adults
32
Bucks Creek Model Scenario 3 Summary
Summary
Month 3‐CD 3‐D 3‐N 3‐WJanuary 4 4 4 4February 4 4 4 4March 4 8 10 12April 4 8 10 12May 8 8 10 12June 8 8 8 8July 6 6 8 8August 6 6 8 8September 6 6 8 8October 6 6 8 8November 4 4 6 6December 4 4 4 4
33
Clarifying Questions & Next Steps
34
Upcoming PM&E Meetings
• June 14: (Sacramento-ERM Office)
– Aquatic invasive species discussion
– PM&E measure review
– Management plan check-in and overview
• June 15: WebEx (9-11 am)
– Willow Flycatcher PM&E discussion
– PM&E status update and schedule follow-up meetings
35
Upcoming PM&E Meetings, Continued
• June 29: Process Team meeting (PG&E Office-Sac)
• June 30: Instream Flow
– Instream Flow (agenda topics TBD)
Refer to the Calendar located on the Project Website for complete list of updated meeting dates/topics