building enclosure...
TRANSCRIPT
4/19/2013
1
Presented�by�H.�Jay�Enck and�Fiona�Aldous
ACG 9th Annual Conference on Total Building Commissioning
Chicago, Illinois
Building�Enclosure�Commissioning
April�19,�20138.00am�Ͳ12.00pm
Copyright Materials
This presentation is protected by US and International Copyright laws. Reproduction,
distribution, display and use of the presentation without written permission of the speaker is
prohibited.
© Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates, Inc. 2013
© Commissioning and Green Building Solutions, Inc. 2013
Learning�Objectives1. Understanding�application�of�the�commissioning�process�to�building�enclosures2. Understanding�of�the�skill�set�needed�to�provide�building�enclosure�commissioning3. Conceptual�evaluation�principles�used�to�commission�building�enclosures�4. Creation�of�the�commissioning�team�
ACG�is�a�Registered�Provider�with�The�American�Institute�of�Architects�Continuing�Education�Systems.��Credit�earned�on�completion of this�program�will�be�reported�to�ASHRAE�Records�for�AIA�members.��Certificates�of�Completion�for�nonͲAIA�members�are�available�on�request.
This�program�is�registered�with�the�AIA/ACG�for�continuing�professional�education.��As�such,�it�does�not�include�content�that�may�be�deemed�or�construed�to�be�an�approval�or�endorsement�by�the�AIA�of�any�material�of�construction�or�any�method�or�manner�of�handling,�using,�distributing,�or�dealing�in�any�material�or�product.��Questions�related�to�specific�materials,�methods,�and�services�will�be�addressed�at�the�conclusion�of�this�presentation.
4/19/2013
2
Why�Commission�Buildings?
ї Reduce�Riskї Evaluate�that�system�works�at�installї Gain�validity�for�energy�efficiency�claims
ї Improve�Durability
ї Authority�Having�Jurisdiction�
ї Certification�of��Building,�ie.�LEED
ї Verify�and�document�the�building�meets�the�OPR
HVAC�/�Building�Enclosure• GSA:�Building�Commissioning�Guide:
• NIBS:�Guideline�3:�The�Building�Enclosure�Commissioning�Process�(2012)
HVAC�Commissioning�/�BECx• Design�phase�reviews�
• BECx spec
• Testing�schedule�• Cannot�wait�until�end�of�project�to�test
• 100%�testing�not�feasible• multiͲpart�assemblies
• No�“preͲfunctional”�tests
MEP�Cx vs.�BECx (ASHRAE�G’line 0):Same�process,�different�practice
4/19/2013
3
Why�is�BECx unique?• Each�building�enclosure�design�is�a�“oneͲoff”• The�building�enclosure�should�respond�to�a�unique�set�of�
conditions�and�performance�requirements�based�upon�the�commensurate�acceptable�“risk”�of�the�building�function�and�occupants
• Building�enclosures�are�not�easily�“tweaked”�to�achieve�the�specified�performance
• The�Owner’s�requirements�are�unique�to�the�building�enclosure�system
• Design�of�the�enclosure�includes�numerous�systems�and�materials,�installed�by�numerous�parties.�Risk�of�error�is�high
• The�building�enclosure�impacts�performance�of�other�systems,�such�as�mechanical
• Testing�must�occur�early�during�construction
RISK�management and�…Building�use• “essential”�buildings;�i.e.�
hospitals• laboratories�and/or�scientific�
research�• critical�communications�and�data�
centers
Building�reͲuse• Preservation,�revitalization,�
rehabilitation,�retroͲfit,�reͲclad�or�reͲuse
• Infinite�combinations
Unique�functions�• interior�functions,�such�as�
natatoriums
Failures�Point�out�Need�for�Cx
• Architecture�profession�under�pressure�for�poor�designs.
• Construction�industry�under�pressure�for�poor�quality.
• Claims�by�USGBC�that�LEED�buildings�are�more�energy�efficient�have�been�seriously�questioned.
• Some�highly�touted�buildings�have�turned�out�to�not�have�building�enclosures�that�perform.
• Some�jurisdictions�have�gone�as�far�as�to�require�separate�review�by�building�enclosure�experts
4/19/2013
4
� Problems�in�new�buildings�are�commonplace
� These�problems�are�both�repetitive,�predictable,�and�preventable
� Some�building�types�and�components�fail�at�unusually�high�rates
� Some�things�put�buildings�at�extreme�risk,�but�it’s�usually�not spending�too�little�money�or�too�aggressive�schedules
Trends�in�Problem�Buildings
How�Walls�Fail�– Poor�Details
• Designers�who�only�illustrate�drainage�plane�details�through�plan�view�leave�reality�of�installation�to�contractor’s�imagination
• The�devil�in�the�detail�is�how�the�detail�works�in�3Ͳdimensional�planes
• Drainage�plane�details�should�drain�without�sealants�as�the�main�moisture�barrier�
When�to�Commission�the�Enclosureї Building�Typeї Complexityї Risk�Exposure/Tolerance
ї Team�Expertise
ї Certification�Requirements
ї Authority�Having�Jurisdiction
ї Code
4/19/2013
5
• By�Design�Trends:– Complexity�:�The�increasing�complexity�of�building�enclosure�design�to�achieve�sustainable�design�goals�prevalent�in�current�architectural�practice�has�lead�to�an�increase�in�responsibility�(and�liability)�for�the�architect.�
– PerformanceͲcritical�buildings:�Often�require�strictly�controlled�interior�environments�which�rely�upon�a�building�enclosure�which�is�installed,�and�continuously�operates�in�accord�with�established�criteria.�These�are�complex�interͲrelated�systems.
Current Building Code Requirements
106.1.3: Exterior Wall Envelope:
“Construction Documents for all buildings shall describe the exterior wall envelope in sufficient detail to determine compliance with this code. The construction documents shall provide details of the exterior wall envelope as required, including flashing, intersections with dissimilar materials, corners, end details, control joints, intersections at roof, eaves, or parapets, means of drainage, water-resistive membrane, and details around openings.”
IBC• IBC�2009�– no�Cx requirements�for�BE• IECC�2009�– design�professional�shall�provide�evidence�of�
HVAC�system�completion�(5.3.2.9)• IECC�2012�– design�professional�shall�provide�evidence�of�
system�(HVAC�&�Lighting)�Cx &�completion�including:– Cx Plan�by�RDP�or�App’d Agency– Air�&�Hydronic systems�balance�report– Functional�Performance�Testing– Documentation�– O&M– Preliminary�Cx Report�with�written
consent�from�Owner– Final�Cx Report�within�90�days
CODE�IS�MINIMUM�REQUIREMENT!
By�practice,COMMISSIONING�IS�BEYOND�CODE�REQUIREMENT!
Recent�&�Future�Code�Changes
4/19/2013
6
LEED�Cx• LEED�NC�2009�(Fundamental�&�Enhanced)• LEED�(Version�4):
– “Fundamental”�– Same�as�2009�+�Design�Review• Includes�Building�Enclosure�for�OPR�and�BOD
– “Enhanced”�– Independent�CxA (2�to�6)• BECx 2�points,�Enhanced�3�points,�MBCx 1�point• References�ASHRAE�Guidelines�0,�1.1�and�NIBS�Guideline�3,�2006
• Prepare�a�CFR�&�O&M�Plan• Develop�onͲgoing�Cx Plan
SOME�GOVERNMENT,�FEDERAL,�STATE�and�CITY�organizations�require�BECx
ELECTRICAL� Lighting & Power� Energy
Consumption� Fire & Life Safety
PLUMBING SYSTEM� Storm Water� Water & Sewer� Water Efficiency
STRUCTURAL� Wind & Seismic
Loads� Flexibility� Floor Load
BUILDING ENCLOSURE� Moisture Barriers� Air Barriers� Vapor Retarders� Fenestration� Insulation� Roof� Waterproofing
HVAC SYSTEM� Proper Selection &
Sizing� Sufficient Run Time� Adequate
Pressurization & Ventilation
NIBS/ASHRAETotal�Building�Commissioning
Standards�&�Guidelines
4/19/2013
7
NIBS�Guideline�3�Ͳ 2006Exterior�Enclosure�Technical�Requirements�for�the�Commissioning�Process“The�Commissioning�Process�is�a�qualityͲoriented�process�for�achieving,�verifying,�and�documenting�that�the�performance�of�facilities,�systems,�and�assemblies�meets�defined�objectives�and�criteria.”��
The�Guideline�3Ͳ2006�Exterior�Enclosure�Technical�Requirements�for�the�Commissioning�Process�(available�at:�http://www.wbdg.org/ccb/NIBS/nibs_gl3.pdf)
NIBS�Guideline�32012“… the process by which the design and constructed performance of building enclosure materials, components, assemblies and systems are validated to meet defined objectives and requirements of the project, as established by the Owner.”
The Guideline 3-2012 Building Enclosure Commissioning Process available at: FREE
http://www.wbdg.org/ccb/browse_doc.php?d=7167
ASTM�E2813�(2012)�Standard�Practice�for�Building�Enclosure�Commissioning
available for: $47.00http://www.astm.org/Standards/E2813.htm
“This�practice�is�intended�to�serve�as�a�concise,�authoritative,�and�technically�sound�practice�for�Building�Enclosure�Commissioning�(BECx)�that�is�based�upon:• The�Owner�Project�Requirements• Clearly�defined�and�enforceable�levels�of�BECx• Minimum�core�competencies�required�of�the�BECxA and�associated�serviceͲ
providers�(see�4.2)�to�qualify�as�Fundamental�or�Enhanced�BECx under�this�practice.”
4/19/2013
8
ASTM�E2813:�Standard�Practice• Two�levels�of�BECx:
– Fundamental�&�Enhanced�(LEED�compatibility?)• Includes:
– Qualifications�for�BECxA– “process”�overlap/conflict�with�G’line 0 and�3– OPR:�Questions�representing�the�minimum�range�of�issues�&�concerns�that�must�be�considered�under�the�E2813�practice�during�the�development�of�the�OPR�to�determine�the�level�of�Cxand�functional�performance�testing�required�for�a�building�or�structure.�
– Design�Peer�Review:• Fundamental:�1�at�completion�of�CDs• Enhanced:�3�during�Design�Phase�(SD,�DD�&�CD)
– Addition�of�a�PreͲConstruction�phase– Mandatory�Testing– Does�not�accommodate�for�various�project�delivery�methods
ASTM�E2813�–Mandatory�Testing*:
Fundamental,�FIELD�mockͲup
Fundamental,��in�situ
Enhanced,�FIELD�mockͲup
Enhanced,�in�situ
Extra�info:
AIR�BORNE�SOUND E966OUTDOOR�SOUND E1014OUTDOOR�SOUND E1503WHOLE�BLDG�AIR E779WHOLE�BLDG�AIR E1827AIR E783 E783 E783 E783 *Opaque�walls
AIR E783 E783 E783 E783�(2x) *�WindowsAIR�BARRIER E1186 E1186IR FOR�WET�INSULATION�IN�ROOFS
C1153 C1153
WATER�FLOOD�TEST�Ͳ ROOFS D5957 D5957 *All�HZ�surfaces
WATER�Ͳ STATIC E1105 E1105 E1105 E1105�(2x)WATER�Ͳ DYNAMIC AAMA501.1WATER AAMA501.2 AAMA501.2 AAMA501.2 AAMA501.2ADHESION D4541 D4541 D4541ANCHOR STRENGTH�Ͳ CONCRETE E488 E488 E488PULL TESTING�Ͳ EIFS E2359 E2359 E2359 E2359ADHESION Ͳ SEALANT C794 C794 C794 C794�(3x)ADHESION�Ͳ SEALANT C1193,�X1Ͳ
Method�AC1193,�X1ͲMethod�A
C1193,�X1ͲMethod�A
C1193,�X1ͲMethod�A
SEISMIC/INTERͲSTORY DRIFT AAMA501.4 AAMA501.4*�Optional�tests�not�included�in�summary�table
ASTM�E2813�and�(upcoming)ASTM�Standard�Guide�for�BECx
Look�Ahead:• ASTM�“Practice”�coordinated�with�G’line 3�“Process”
• G’line 3�converted�to�“Standard”�language• BECxA and�BES�Certification
– University�of�Wisconsin,�Professional�Development�Program�:�BECxA Classes�&�Certification�(http://epdweb.engr.wisc.edu/Courses/course.lasso?myCourseChoice=N426)
– ASTM�Certification�– yet�to�be�defined• Certification�by�ASTM
4/19/2013
9
BECxA Definition�&�QualificationsGuideline�3�definitions:Building�Enclosure�Commissioning�Authority�(BECxA): Entity�who�is�designated�by�the�team�to�formally�document�the�project�specific�Building�Enclosure�Commissioning.�This�entity�should�be�trained,�experienced�and�knowledgeable�in�the�process�of�building�enclosure�commissioning�and�possess�basic�architectural�and�building�science�knowledge�of�the�design,�performance,�systems�and�construction�related�to�the�building�enclosure.�The�BECxA role�may�be�accomplished�by�the�BES,�CxA or�an�additional�member�to�the�team.Building�Enclosure�Specialist�(BES): This�person�or�party�is�deemed�an�“expert”�in�the�building�enclosure�systems�anticipated�to�be�used�on�the�proposed�building�and�possesses�the�experience�and�technical�qualifications�to�design,�critique,�validate�and�support�the�team�in�the�project�development�and�construction�validation.Commissioning�Authority�(CxA):�An�entity�identified�by�the�Owner�who�leads,�plans,�schedules,�and�coordinates�the�commissioning�team�to�implement�the�commissioning�process.�(Source:�ASHRAE�Guideline�0Ͳ2005)
BECxA Qualifications,�per�ASTM�E28134.2.1�BECxA Core�Competencies:4.2.1.1�Building�and�Materials�Science,�including,�at�a�minimum,�demonstrated�knowledge�of�the:(1)�Principles�associated�with�heat�transfer�via�conduction,�convection,�radiation,�and�air�infiltration/exfiltration;(2)�Principles�associated�with�moisture�storage�and�transport�via�gravity,�diffusion,�convection,�capillary�action,�absorbed�flow,�and�osmosis,�and;(3)�Characteristics�and�behavior�of�enclosureͲrelated�materials,�components,�systems,�and�assemblies�when�specified�for�a�given�application,�geographic�region,�location,�exposure,�or�climate,�and�corresponding�influence�on�workability,�durability,�serviceability,�performance,�and�anticipated�serviceͲlife.
4.2.1.2�Procurement�and�Project�Delivery,�including,�at�a�minimum,�demonstrated�knowledge�of�the:(1)�Influence of�the�project�delivery�method��selected�by�the�Owner�on�the�scope,�adaptation,�implementation,�and�cost�of�the�BECx process�as�defined�in�this�standard;(2)�Influence of�the�number�and�type�of�contracts��established�between�the�Owner�and�the�design�and�construction�teams�on�the�role�and�responsibilities�of�the�BECxAand�individual�members�of�the�BECx team;(3)�Influence of�design�and�construction�scheduling,�phasing,�and�sequencing�of�the�work�on�the�scope,�adaptation,�implementation,�and�cost�of�the�BECx process�as�defined�in�this�standard;(4)�Influence of�the�experience,�qualifications,�technical�depth,�and�commitment�of�both�the�design�and�the�construction�teams�to�the�BECx process�on�the�role�and�responsibilities�of�the�BECxA (and�BECx team),�the�range�and�technical�depth�required�of�the�BECx team,�and�the�anticipated�scope�and�cost�of�the�BECx process.����
BECxA Qualifications4.2.1�BECxA Core�Competencies:�(E2813�cont)4.2.1.3�Contract�Documents�and�Construction�Administration,�including,�at�a�minimum,�demonstrated�knowledge�of�the:(1)�Interrelationship�and�commonly�understood�hierarchy�that�exists�between�Procurement�Documents,�Contract�Documents,��Contract�Drawings�and�Specifications��developed�during�the�Design�Phase�of�the�BECx process,�as�well�as�submittals�and�legally�binding�Instruments�of�Change��issued�during�the�PreͲConstruction�(Procurement)�and�Construction�Phases�of�the�BECx process,�including�but�not�limited�to:�Addenda;�Submittals;�Architect’s�Supplemental�Instructions�and�Field�Directives;�Construction�Change�Directives,�and;�Change�Orders;�����(2)�Influence of�enclosureͲrelated�design,�detailing,�and�integration��on�total�building�performance,�including�at�a�minimum�consideration�of�the�performance�attributes�listed�in�1.5�and�Annex�A1�of�this�practice;(3)�Influence of�product�selection,�allowable�construction�tolerances,�and�dimensional�requirements�to�accommodate�environmental�and�service�loads�on�detailing�at�interface�conditions�between�enclosureͲrelated�materials,�components,�systems,�and�assemblies,�and;�the�corresponding�influence on�sequencing,�phasing,�and�coordination�of�trades�during�the�Construction�Phase�of�the�BECx process;��(4)�Importance�of�material�compatibility�and�continuity�of�primary�heat,�air,�and�moisture�control�layers�throughout�the�building�enclosure�on�total�building�performance�and�the�appropriate�mitigation�of�risks�associated�with�improperly�managed�heat,�air,�and�moisture�transport�across�the�building�enclosure;(5)�Importance�of�the�timely�preparation�and�distribution�of�subjectͲdirect,�technically�sound,�and�actionable�documentation�and�feedback�to�the�Owner,�the�design,�and�the�construction�teams�throughout�the�Construction�Phase�of�the�BECx process.�
4/19/2013
10
BECxA Qualifications4.2.1�BECxA Core�Competencies:�(cont.)4.2.1.4�Performance�Test�Standards�and�Methodology,�including,�at�a�minimum,�demonstrated�knowledge�of�the:�(1)�PreͲconstruction�laboratory�and�fieldͲapplied�test�standards�and�methodology�referenced�in�this�standard��and�their�intended�use�and�application��in�evaluating�the�durability,�performance,�constructability,�and�anticipated�serviceͲlife�of�enclosureͲrelated�materials,�components,�systems,�and�assemblies;(2)��Importance�of�establishing�appropriate�and�quantifiable�thresholds�of�performance�and�accompanying�clear�and�unambiguous�definitions�of�failure��for�enclosureͲrelated�materials,�components,�systems,�and�assemblies�to�validate�the�OPR�and�BOD,�and�to�allow�for�proper�enforcement�of�the�contract�documents;(3)�Influence of�modifications�to�the�intended�use�and�application�of�preͲconstruction�laboratory�and�field�test�standards�and�methodology�on�the�appropriate�interpretation�of�test�results�and�their�relevance�to�the�requirements�of�the�contract�documents;(4)�Importance�of�ensuring�the�timely,�clear,�and�unambiguous�translation�transfer�of�all�information�relating�to�modifications�to�the�design,�construction,�and�integration�of�enclosureͲrelated�materials,�components,�systems,�and�assemblies�arising�from�preͲconstruction�laboratory�testing�to�the�field�during�the�Construction�Phase�of�the�BECx process;���(5)�Importance�of�recognizing�the�distinction�between�errors�and�omissions�in�architectural�and/or�product�design�vs.�defective�installation�and/or�workmanship�when�interpreting�field�test�results,�and;�the�techniques�available�during�the�development�and�implementation�of�field�testing�protocols�that�will�minimize�the�risk�for�confusion�and�misinterpretation�relative�to�the�requirements�of�the�contract�documents;(6)�Distinction�between�test�standards�and�methodologies�“recognized�in�the�industry”�or�otherwise�developed�by�industry�or�trade�associations�vs.�test�standards�developed�by�independent�standardsͲwriting�organizations�and�the�impact,�if�any,�on�the�enforcement�of�the�contract�documents�when�both�are�included�in�the�project�specifications.
The�Commissioning�Team• Everyone�involved�with�the�design,�
construction�and�approval�of�the��building�enclosure�systems�being�commissioned�has�a�role
• Commissioning�Authority��– Generally�manages�the�Cx process,�
selects/organizes�and�directs�the�team,�and�documents�the�process
– CxA is�supported�by�minority�partners,�Building�Enclosure�CxA,�etc
• Owner�• CM�and�Building�Enclosure�Subcontractors• AE/Designers�• Future�Users�and�Operator�• Contractors�and�Vendors• Safety�and�Approval�Authorities
The�BECxA• Technical qualifications�in�education• Associated�&�BECx experience
– Knowledge– Expertise– Objective– Sufficient�experienced�staffing– Tools�to�communicate– Independent
• Written�Report�at�various�stages�of�project,�outlining�findings�and�recommendations
4/19/2013
11
design�reviews�&�manuals
construction�observation�&� performance�testing
sustainablecomplex
Owner’s�Project�Requirements
achieve�performance�&�
function
enhance�durability
verificationdocumentation
enhance�quality
independent�&�experienced
BECx
31
interͲdependentLEED�/�IGCC,
etcenergyIAQ
comfort
BuildingEnclosure�
Commissioning(BECx)
Reduce�risk
Building�Enclosure�Cx:Skill�Set
Background:• History�of�the�Commissioning�Process• Building�Enclosure�Cx process• Existing�Building�Commissioning�process• OnͲgoing�commissioning• Total�Building�Cx• Documentation• Industry�organizations• Certifications�• Continuing�and�Fundamental�Education• Safety• Business,�contracts,�legalities�and�insurance
Building�Enclosure�Cx:Skill�Set
Fundamental�Knowledge:• Building�Science• High�Performance,�Energy�Efficiency�and�DayͲlighting• Basics�of�Building�Enclosures:�Materials,�Performance�and�
Systems• High�Performance�Building�Enclosures:�Criteria�and�Details• Details�and�Interfaces• Basics�of�HVAC• Building�Codes:�Past,�Current�and�High�Performance�Building�
Enclosures• Building�Enclosure�Field�Test�Standards/Methods• Appropriate�tests�for�building�enclosure�systems• Application�of�Field�Testing�methods• Post�occupancy�evaluation• Facility�engineer�training
4/19/2013
12
Building�Enclosure�Cx:Skill�Set
Practice�/�Workshops:• Development�of�the�OPR• Development�of�the�BECx plan• Performing�a�Design�Review• Development�of�the�BECx specification��
Supplemental�Course�Material:• Building�Enclosure�Simulation�Tools• Integration�of�BECx and�DLCx towards�Total�Building�Cx• Integrated�Cx on�High�Performance�buildings• Project�Delivery�methods�and�impact�on�Cx• What�it�takes�to�deliver�successful�projects• Staffing
Staffing�for�Building�Enclosure�Cx
• Recruits• Experience• Knowledge• Skills• Challenges• Certification
…�focus�is�on�quality�assurance…�
¾ BECx PreͲ Design�Phase�CxA Budget�/�ScopeCx Team�SelectionDefine�Team�Cx Roles�and�ResponsibilitiesDevelop�/�Assist�in�Owner’s�Project�Requirements�documentDevelop�BECx Design�Phase�Plan�included�in�Total�project�commissioning�planDesign�checklists
¾ BECx Design�Phase�
¾ BECx PreͲConstruction�Phase�(ASTM�E2813,�Not�required�by�Guideline�3)
…�focus�switch�to�quality�control�&�validation…
¾ BECx Construction�Phase�Phase
¾ BECx Occupancy�and�Operations�Phase
4/19/2013
13
The�Owners�Project�Requirements�documents�the�requirements�against�which�the�PreͲDesign,�Design�and�Construction,�and�Operation�will�be�evaluated�against.�
OPR�/�BOD“�The�Basis�of�Design�(BOD)�is�a�narrative�and�analytical�documentation�prepared�by�the�design�AͲE�along�with�design�submissions�to�explain�how�the�Owner's�Project�Requirements�(OPR)�are�met�by�the�proposed�design…�An�OPR�is�developed�for�an�owner/user�audience�while�the�BOD�is�typically�developed�in�more�technical�terms.”
http://www.wbdg.org/project/perform_req.php
Enclosure�Considerations�New�Buildings
• Owner’s�vision– Buildings�function– Image– Service�life– Expansion�strategy
• Budget�&�Schedule
• Owner�directives– Product�preferences
• Roof• Fenestration�system• Exterior�finish�materials
Enclosure�Considerations�New�Buildings
• Envelope�integrity– Leakiness– Allowable�levels�of�moisture�intrusion
– Weather�Resistance• Hurricane• Tornado
• Quality�requirements– Level�of�finish– Workmanship– General�exterior�appearance
– Durability• Service�life
4/19/2013
14
Enclosure�ConsiderationsNew�Buildings
• Occupant�requirements– Thermal�comfort– Visual�comfort– Connectivity�with�outside– Acoustics– Life�Safety
• Blast,�progressive�collapse,�etc.
– Restrictions�limitations• Blend�with�historical�fabric
Enclosure�Considerations:�New�Buildings• Occupant�requirements
– Level�of�occupant�control• Operable�windows
– O&M�staff�only– Individual�occupant– HVAC�interaction
– Operation�&�maintenance• Access• Level�of�maintenance• No.�of�O&M�staff
– Skill�set– Scope�of�work
Enclosure�Considerations�New�Buildings
• Sustainability– Energy�Efficiency�Goals– Daylighting– Indoor�Air�Quality– Local�and�Regional�Materials
– Recycled�Content– Heat�Island
• Geographical�Location– Weather
• Freeze�Thaw• Location�of�Vapor�Barriers
– Exterior�Shading– Solar�Access
4/19/2013
15
Enclosure�ConsiderationsExisting�Buildings
• Evidence�of�Deterioration– Spalling– Cracking– Dislocation– Sealant�pliability/flexibility– Sealant�adhesion– Corrosion– Erosion– Carbonization– DeͲlamination– Discoloration– Rot
• Moisture�Issues– Liquid�infiltration– Efflorescence– Condensation– Mold�&�Mildew– Absorption– Moisture�Content– Moisture�Transfer– Path�of�Moisture�Intrusion
Enclosure�ConsiderationsExisting�Buildings
• Limitations– Existing�Regulations– Historic�Designations
• Structural– Seismic– Envelope�Support– Connections
• Energy�Efficiency– Thermal�resistance
• Wall�Assemblies– Above�&�Below�Grade
• Fenestration�Assemblies• Roof
– Building�Tightness• Infiltration/Exfiltration
– Stack�effect– Capacitance�
The�Commissioning�Plan�(Cx)
5.2.4.1“The�Commissioning�Plan�identifies�processes�and�procedures�necessary�for�a�successful�Commissioning�Process.”
ASHRAE�Guideline�Ͳ The�Commissioning�Process,�ASHRAE�GUIDELINE�– 0Ͳ2005,�American�Society�of�Heating,�Refrigerating�and�AirͲConditioning�Engineers,�Inc.�Atlanta�GA,�www.ashrae.org
4/19/2013
16
BECx Plan
A�building�enclosure�commissioning�plan�shall�follow�the�established�phases�of�a�new�construction�project;�however�each�plan’s�tasks�and�objectives�may�vary�depending�upon�the�Owner’s�requirements�and�the�exterior�enclosure�design.�Each�plan�requires�comprehensive�documentation�throughout�each�phase�of�the�process.
…�focus�is�on�quality�assurance…�
¾ BECx PreͲ Design�Phase�
¾ BECx Design�Phase�Construction�Document�(drawings�&�specs)�Review�and�ReportProject�Team�MeetingsBuilding�Enclosure�Commissioning�SpecificationUpdated�OPR,�BOD,�Commissioning�Reviews�and�Plan�DocumentationReview�of�Cx Scope�and�budget
¾ BECx PreͲConstruction�Phase
…�focus�switch�to�quality�control�&�validation…
¾ BECx Construction�Phase��
¾ BECx Occupancy�and�operation
Design�review�vs.�Peer�Review
“Peer�Review�has�the�potential�to�enhance�the�quality�and�reliability�of�the�design,�review,�and�construction�of�buildings,�structures�and�facilities.�It�provides�additional�assurance�of�the�completed�project’s�performance�by�adding�an�independent�and�experienced�voice�to�the�process.�The�review�would�be�performed�by�registered�architects,�engineers,�or�special�experts�with�knowledge�and�experience�comparable�or�exceeding�those�of�the�project’s�design�professionals�and�comparable�to�the�technical,�conceptual,�and�theoretical�aspects�of�the�project.”
General�Administrative�Provisions,�103.3.6.3�Contract�and�Peer�Review,�User’s�Guide�for�the�2003�ICC�Performance�Code�for�Buildings�and�Facilities.
4/19/2013
17
Current ICC Requirements
106.1.3: Exterior Wall Envelope:
“Construction Documents for all buildings shall describe the exterior wall envelope in sufficient detail to determine compliance with this code. The construction documents shall provide details of the exterior wall envelope as required, including flashing, intersections with dissimilar materials, corners, end details, control joints, intersections at roof, eaves, or parapets, means of drainage, water-resistive membrane, and details around openings.”
Code = Minimal Requirements for safety, health and welfare
Design�Pressures�(DP)�/�ASCE�7
Each�building�is�unique�–exterior�enclosure�design,�functional�requirements,�environment,etc
ASHRAE�Zones
4/19/2013
18
• control�the�path�of�water�or�vapor,�air,�heat�flow,�light,�and�noise,�and�be�and�structurally�sound.�
• The�enclosure�assembly�must�consider�the�building’s�structure,�applied�loads,�resistance�to�fire�and�pests
• control�of�interior�conditioned�environment�
• secure• constructible�and�economical
• durable,�maintainable�and�responsible
Performance
Design�Review�Basic�Building�Science
AIR
High�to�Low
Air�Barrier�systemEnergy�Efficiency
HEAT
Hot�to�Cold
Continuous�insulation�(CI)
Thermal�bridging�effect
MOISTURE
Control/Disposal
ContinuityPermeability
Psychometric�Chart
4/19/2013
19
Managing�Heat,�Air,�MoistureRadiation
Radiation
Managing�Heat,�Air,�Moisture
Radiation
• Thermal�Radiation– Electromagnetic�Radiation
• Reflected�or�Absorbed– Reflected/Absorbed�Energy
• Surface�Characteristics�
– Thermal�Emittance�(infrared)�• Surface�Characteristics�
Managing�Heat,�Air,�Moisture
4/19/2013
20
Radiation
• Material�temperature�during�the�day�is�a�function�of:– Color,�surface�reflectance,�and�
emissivity��characteristics�determine�amount�of�solar�energy�gain
– Color�and�surface�smoothness�determine�reflectance�
Managing�Heat,�Air,�Moisture
Radiation
• Material�temperature�during�the�day�is�a�function�of:– Emissivity�of�a�material�is�the�
relative�ability�of�the�material’s�surface�to�emit�energy�by�radiation.
– Materials�with�high�emissivity�dissipate�heat�faster�than�materials�with�low�emissivity
Managing�Heat,�Air,�Moisture
Radiation
• Solar�Reflectance�Index�(SRI):– Factors�solar�reflectance�and�emissivity�together�to�provide�of�a�
material�is�the�relative�ability�of�the�material’s�surface�to�emit�energy�by�radiation.
– High�SRI�=�Cooler�roofs– Low�SRI�=�Warmer�roofs
Managing�Heat,�Air,�Moisture
4/19/2013
21
Conduction�Terminology
Managing�Heat,�Air,�Moisture
Thermal�Bridges
• Relatively�high�heat�flow�area�through�the�building�envelope– Lowers/raises�surface�temperature�which�can�result�in�occupant�discomfort�due�to�the�radiant�affect
– Short�circuits�insulation�value�which�may�result�in�condensation�within�the�dry�zone�of�the�wall�assembly
– Increases�energy�intensity�and�carbon�emissions
Thermal�Bridges
4/19/2013
23
Capacitance
• Thermal– Specific�heat�capacity�(c)
• Change�in�heat�(energy)�of�unit�mass�of�material�for�unit�change�of�temperature�in�Btu/lbͼ°F
– Volumetric�heat�capacity�(ʌc)• Change�in�heat�stored�in�unit�volume�of�material�for�unit�change�of�temperature,�in�Btu/ft3ͼ°F
Managing�Heat,�Air,�Moisture
Capacitance
• Thermal�Mass– Provides�"inertia"�against�temperature�fluctuations
• McpȴT=Q
Managing�Heat,�Air,�Moisture
Moisture�Flow• Vapor�Transfer
– Vapor�transmission– Negative�Pressurization
• Liquid�Transfer– Capillary�Action– Gravity– Wind– Negative�Pressurization– Condensation/Dew�Point
Managing�Heat,�Air,�Moisture
4/19/2013
24
• Hygrothermal�Loads
Managing�Heat,�Air,�Moisture
• Hygrothermal�Loads
Managing�Heat,�Air,�Moisture
Simulation�Tools�ͲWall�Analysis��
• Correct�weather�assumptions?
• Correct�interior�conditions�assumptions?�
• What�are�the�contributing�factors�to�indoor�humidity?
4/19/2013
25
Heat�Transfer�simulationLocation:�Birmingham,�AlabamaExt�Temperature:�24°F�(from�AHRAE�2009�ͲBirmingham�Municipal�Airport)Int Temperature:�72°FRH:�35%Dewpoint:�42�°FInsulation�Height:�48”�from�top�of�concreteInsulation�Thickness:�4”
44.3�°F
46.0�°F
TwoͲDimensional�Building�HeatͲTransfer�ModelingTHERM�is�a�stateͲofͲtheͲart,�Microsoft�Windows™Ͳbased�computer�program�developed�at�Lawrence�Berkeley�National�Laboratory�(LBNL)�for�those�interested�in�heat�transfer.�Using�THERM,�you�can�model�twoͲdimensional�heatͲtransfer�effects�in�building�components�such�as�windows,�walls,�foundations,�roofs,�and�doors;�where�thermal�bridges�are�of�concern.�THERM's�heatͲtransfer�analysis�allows�you�to�evaluate�a�product’s�energy�efficiency�and�local�temperature�patterns,�which�may�relate�directly�to�problems�with�condensation,�moisture�damage,�and�structural�integrity.
http://windows.lbl.gov/software/therm/therm.html
Transient�Hygrothermal�Analysis
WUFI Pro 5.08760 Hour Calculations
WUFIͲORNL/IBP�is�a�menuͲdriven�PC�program�which�allows�realistic�calculation�of�the�transient�coupled�oneͲdimensional�heat�and�moisture�transport�in�multiͲlayer�building�components�exposed�to�natural�weather.�It�is�based�on�the�newest�findings�regarding�vapourdiffusion�and�liquid�transport�in�building�materials�and�has�been�validated�by�detailed�comparison�with�measurements�obtained�in�the�laboratory�and�on�outdoor�testing�fields.�
http://www.ornl.gov/sci/btc/apps/moisture/
Wall�Vapor�Transmission�Profiles
E111999005ATL\sc 108. FH8
Finished WoodStrips OverCloth Finish
1.5” Air Space
100
90
80
70
60
50
Surface Temperature
Dew Po in t
100
90
80
70
60
50
Insid e A ir Fi lm
1/2” Gypsum Wall Board
1” Polystyrene Insu lation
C eme ntit ious Water Proof Coa ting8” C MU Outside Air Fi lm
4/19/2013
26
Wall�Vapor�Transmission�Profiles
Inside Air Film
E 111999005A TL\sc 107.FH8
100
90
80
70
60
50
1/2” Gypsum Wall Board
1” Polystyrene InsulationCementi tious Water Proof Coating
8” CMU
100
90
80
70
60
50
Surface Temperature
Vinyl
Outs ide Air Film
Condensationin Wall
Dew Point
Wall�AnalysisWall Component Thickness Plane R-Value Surface Temp Sat. Vapor Pressure Vapor Resistance Vapor Pressure Dewpoint Temp Relative Humidity
(Inches) Location (F-SF-H/BTU) (F) (in. Hg) (Rep) Profile (F) (%)
OUTDOOR 93.0 0.9359 60.0%EXTERIOR AIR FILM 0.000 0.000 0.170 92.7 1.5473 0.000 0.9359 77.0 60.5%
BRICK MASONRY 4.000 4.000 0.440 91.9 1.5082 1.300 0.5889 63.4 39.0%
AIR GAP 2.000 6.000 1.000 90.0 1.4225 0.017 0.5845 63.2 41.1%
DENS GLASS 0.625 6.625 0.560 88.9 1.3765 0.020 0.5792 62.9 42.1%
METAL STUD 6.000 12.625 1.125 86.8 1.2880 0.050 0.5658 62.3 43.9%
6" CMU 6.000 18.625 1.340 84.3 1.1890 0.417 0.4546 56.2 38.2%METAL STUD W/ 3.5" R-13 BATT INSULATION 3.500 22.125 5.360 74.3 0.8560 0.050 0.4413 55.3 51.6%
0 0.000 22.125 0.000 74.3 0.8560 0.000 0.4413 55.3 51.6%GYPSUM WALL BOARD 0.625 22.750 0.560 73.3 0.8264 0.020 0.4359 55.0 52.7%INTERIOR AIR FILM 0.000 22.750 0.680 72.0 0.7916 0.000 0.4359 55.0 55.1%
INDOOR 72.0 0.4359
CORRECTED VALUE: 11.24 1.87
Wall�Vapor�Transmission�Graph
Summer Conditions
4/19/2013
27
Sample�Vapor�Transmission�Graph
Winter Conditions
DESIGN CONDITIONS
OUTDOOR CONDITIONS: 5.0F Dry Bulb 95%RH
Dewpoint Temperature: 4.0F
Vapor Pressure 0.0464IN. Hg
INDOOR CONDITIONS: 68.0F Dry Bulb 30%RH
Dewpoint Temperature: 35.4F
Vapor Pressure: 0.1988IN. Hg::
Wall�Analysis
Thickness Plane R-Value Surface Temp Sat. Vapor Pressure Vapor Resistance Vapor Pressure Dewpoint Temp Relative Humidity(Inches) Location (F-SF-H/BTU) (F) (in. Hg) (Rep) Profile (F) (%)
5.0 0.0464 95.0%0.000 0.000 0.170 6.0 0.0513 0.000 0.0464 4.0 90.5%4.000 4.000 0.440 8.4 0.0581 1.300 0.1521 28.3 261.8%2.000 6.000 1.000 14.0 0.0769 0.017 0.1535 28.5 199.7%0.625 6.625 0.560 17.2 0.0896 0.020 0.1551 28.7 173.0%6.000 12.625 1.125 23.5 0.1214 0.050 0.1592 29.3 131.1%6.000 18.625 1.340 31.0 0.1723 0.417 0.1931 34.7 112.1%3.500 22.125 5.360 61.0 0.5417 0.050 0.1971 35.2 36.4%0.000 22.125 0.000 61.0 0.5417 0.000 0.1971 35.2 36.4%0.625 22.750 0.560 64.2 0.6051 0.020 0.1988 35.4 32.8%0.000 22.750 0.680 68.0 0.6907 0.000 0.1988 35.4 28.8%
68.0 0.1988
11.24 1.87
Wall�Analysis
4/19/2013
28
Managing�Heat,�Air�Moisture
• Water�Flow�by�Capillary�Suction– The�contact�wetting�angle�is�the�angle�between�the�water�meniscus�and�capillary�surface.�
– The�smaller�this�angle,�the�larger�the�capillary�suction.�
– In�hydrophilic�(waterͲattracting)�materials,�the�contact�wetting�angle�is�less�than�90°
– In�hydrophobic�(waterͲrepelling)materials,�it�is�between�90�and�180°
Hygrothermal�Loads
• Liquid�Flow�at�Low�Moisture�Content– Surface�diffusion�is�defined�as�molecular�movement�of�water�adsorbed�at�the�pore�walls�of�the�material.�
– Liquid�flow,�if�present�at�low�moisture�content,�can�be�described�by�capillary�flow.
– It�is�difficult�to�distinguish�between�liquid�flow�by�suction�and�water�vapor�flow�by�diffusion�in�porous,�hygroscopic�materials
Hygrothermal�Loads
Managing�Heat,�Air�Moisture
Air�Movement�Through�a�Building�
Common Belief -“Smart Air Syndrome”Common Belief -“Smart Air Syndrome” Actual ProcessActual Process
4/19/2013
29
Air�Movement�Through�a�Building�
Airflow�Test�and�Balancing
Measured by TAB
TAB�Often�Misses
Missed by TAB
Measured by TAB
4/19/2013
30
Good�Air�Flow
- +
Exhaust on
Bad�Air�Flow
+ +
Exhaust off
-
How�Walls�Fail�Design/Construction/Operation
• Negative�pressurization�infiltrating�unconditioned�OSA– Stack�affect– Insufficient�OSA�volume
– Leaky�envelope
4/19/2013
31
Managing�Heat,�Air�MoistureAir�and�Moisture�
How�Walls�Fail�Ͳ Design
• No�Vapor�Transmission�Analysis
• HVAC�design�&�operation�and�wall�construction�provide�conditions�perfect�for�mold�&�mildew
Managing�Heat,�Air�MoistureAir�and�Moisture�
4/19/2013
32
Controlling�the�Elements• Rainwater
– Walls– Doors�&�Windows– Details
• Air
Air�and�Moisture�Managing�Heat,�Air�Moisture
Wind�Driven�Rain
Managing�Heat,�Air�Moisture
4/19/2013
33
Gravity�and�Rain
Managing�Heat,�Air�Moisture
Building�Enclosure�Design�Elements
• Exterior�Cladding• Wet�Zone• Dry�Zone• Drainage�Plane• Air�Barrier• Vapor�Barrier
• Vapor�Retarder• Waterproofing• Insulation�Element• Structural�Element• Interface�Condition• Flashing• End�Dams
Hygrothermal�Loads
Managing�Heat,�Air�Moisture
4/19/2013
34
Moisture
• Moisture�capacitance• Moisture�content• Moisture�ratio• Specific�moisture�content• Moisture�transfer
Controlling�the�Elements
• Air�Leakage– Pressurization– Infiltration
• Quality�of�Air– Conditioned– Unconditioned
Air• Transfer
• Wind• Thermal�Buoyancy�(Stack�Effect)• Negative�Pressurization�(HVAC)
• Air�Flux• Construction�Materials• Openings
• Air�permeability• Air�permanence
4/19/2013
35
Expansion�and�Contraction
• Change�in�Temperature–Changes�Size�
Evaluating�Vapor�Transmission• Environmental�Hydrothermal�loads
–Hourly�simulations»Daytime»Nighttime
• Ambient�Temperature�and�Humidity–Solar�vapor�drive�and�interstitial�condensation–Vapor�transmission�analysis�
Wall�Dynamics
• Drying�of�Assembly– Orientation�&�Exposure– Level�of�saturation– Indoor/Outdoor
• Temperature/Humidity
– Physical�Properties�Wall�Components
– Vapor�permeance– Air�movement�
4/19/2013
36
Management�of�The�Elements
• Most�walls�transfer�heat�and�moisture– Rainwater/Bulk�water�
movement– Air�Flow– Diffused�Vapor�Flow
• Transfer�rates– Resistance�to�flow
• Moisture• Air• Thermal
• Wall�assembly�components– Barriers
• Moisture• Air• Thermal
– Retarders– Storage�Capacity
• Ability�to�store�&�hold– Moisture– Thermal
Overview• Impact�of�Building�Enclosure�on�the�HVAC�system
• HVAC�system�issues�contributing�to�enclosure�failures�
• Interactions�between�Building�enclosure�&�HVAC�System
Energy�Profile�of�Buildings
Source:�LBNL�2009
4/19/2013
37
Energy�Profile�In�Buildings
HVAC�Envelope�Loads
• Conduction
• Solar
• Infiltration/Exfiltration
• Ventilation
HVAC�Envelope�Loads
4/19/2013
38
Solar�Loads
HVAC�Loads• Impact�of�Building�Enclosure�Form�&�Orientation
– Annual�solar�radiation�received�is�a�function�of�orientation�and�latitudeDate Solar�Time Solar�Position BTUH/Sq.�Ft.�total�insolation�on�surface
Jan�21
AM PM Alt AZM
Normal Horz.
South�facing�surface�angle�with�horiz.
14 24 34 44 90
7 5 4.8 65.6 71 10 17 21 25 28 31
8 4 16.9 58.3 239 83 110 126 137 145 127
9 3 27.9 48.8 288 151 188 207 221 228 176
10 2 37.2 36.1 308 204 246 268 282 287 207
11 1 43.6 19.6 317 237 283 306 319 324 226
12 46.0 0.0 320 249 296 319 332 336 232
Surface�daily�totals 2766 1622 1984 2174 2300 2360 1766
June�21
6 6 9.3 111.6 97 29 20 12 12 11 7
7 5 22.3 106.8 201 103 87 73 58 41 13
8 4 35.5 102.6 242 173 158 142 122 99 16
9 3 49.0 98.7 263 234 221 204 182 155 18
10 2 62.6 95.0 274 280 269 253 229 199 18
11 1 76.3 90.8 279 309 300 283 259 227 19
12 89.4 0.0 281 319 310 294 269 236 22
Surface�daily�totals 2997 2574 2422 2230 1992 1700 204
TABLE�A2.6a�Solar�Position�and�Insolation�Values�for�24�Degrees�North�LatitudeFrom�Kreider,�J.F.�and�F.�Kreith,�“Solar�Heating�and�Cooling,”
HVAC�Loads
4/19/2013
40
Enclosure�Design�&�Daylighting
• Natural�Light�&�Views– Achieve a minimum
Daylight Factor of 2% in 75% of space occupied for critical visual tasks
– Provide direct line of sight to vision glazing for 90% of all regular, high-occupied spaces
Daylighting
Building�Enclosure�is�just�one�of�Multiple�systems�Involved�in�Daylighting
4/19/2013
41
The�Right�Kind�of�Daylighting
Virtual�Daylight�Modeling
HVAC�&�Building�Enclosure�interaction“the over-all function of an exterior wall, in conjunction with floors and roofs, is to provide a barrier between indoor and outdoor environments, so that the indoor environment can be adjusted and maintained within acceptable limits.”
Hutcheon N. CBD 48, 1963
• Air�infiltration/exfiltration• Concealed�moisture/condensation• External�boundary�pressures�&�internal�
pressures.
4/19/2013
42
Infiltration/Exfiltration
• Summary�of�the�air�leakage�data�for�the�201�U.S.�commercial�and�institutional�buildings
Airtightness�of�Commercial�Buildings�in�the�U.S.Building�and�Fire�Research�Laboratory,�National�Institute�of�Standards�and�Technology
Infiltration/Exfiltration• Normalized�building�air�leakage�vs.�height�of�building�(in�stories)
Infiltration/Exfiltration• Normalized�building�air�leakage�vs.�year�of�construction
4/19/2013
43
Ventilation• Purpose�provide�minimum�ventilation�rates�and�other�measures�intended�to�provide�indoor�air�quality�that�is�acceptable�to�human�occupants�and�that�minimizes�adverse�health�effects.– Contaminates�generated�in�indoor�environment
• Occupants– Activities– Number
• Building�Pressurization
Why�Pressurization�Matters
• Effects�of�Untreated�outdoor�air– Winter�
• Occupant�comfort– Drafts�and�stratification�interfere�with�temperature�control�
– Summer• Occupant�comfort
– Drafts�and�stratification�interfere�with�temperature�control�
• Moisture�buildup�in�interior• Interior�condensation�on�cool�surfaces
– Mold�&�Mildew
Pressurization
4/19/2013
44
Exterior�Enclosure�Tightness• Architect�&�HVAC�Designer
– Minimizing�air�leakage• Fenestration�System• Penetrations
– Doors,�plumbing,�electrical,�louvers,�ducts– Use�of�vestibules/air�locks
• Internal�Vertical�Paths– Stair�wells,�mechanical�shafts,�elevator�shafts,�cavities�(spaces�along�floor�slabs�and�exterior�enclosure
– Connections�between�architectural�elements
• HVAC�Design– Make�up�air�system�in�excess�of�exhaust�capability�+�spill�at�all�operating�conditions�and�exceeds�TAB�allowable�tolerance�
Exterior�Enclosure�Tightness• Architect�&�HVAC�Designer
– Minimizing�air�leakage• HVAC�Design�requirements�(continued)
– Free�of�obstruction�of�return�air�paths�back�to�the�AHU– Balance�between�supply�and�exhaust�for�each�HVAC�zone�– Test�and�balance�of�entire�building– Pressure�mapping�through�all�operating�modes
More�Air�Required�for�Pressurization
4/19/2013
45
HVAC�System�Contribution�to�Enclosure�Failure
HVAC�System�Contribution�to�Failure
Summary• Design�of�the�building�enclosure�affects
– Occupant�comfort– Energy�consumption– HVAC�sizing
• Ventilation/Pressurization
– Lighting�• Visual�Acuity• Glare�
– Views
4/19/2013
46
Summary• Design�of�the�HVAC�affects
– Humidity�control– Thermal�comfort– Pressurization
Perform�review�checking�at�SD,�DD,�50%�and�coordination�review�at�90%.�(MIN.�3�reviews)
Identify�and�address�problems�before�they�occur:
¾ Perform�comprehensive�technical�review and�analysis�¾ including�all�influencing�factors�impacting�
the�performance,�durability�and�maintenance�of�the�building�enclosure.
¾ Perform�computer�based�thermal�modeling�to�predict�performance�of�wall�assembly.
¾ Ensure�owner�/�user�satisfaction
Review�constructability�of�details:
¾ Provide�recommendations�to�Owner�/�A/E�for�consideration�regarding�details�impacting�performance.
¾ Determine�schedule�/�sequencing�impacts�early
Document�Review(s)�and�Report
Project�Team�Meetings
• Charette style• Detail�development�/�
refinement• Owner�/�Design�/�
construction�team�input
• Schedule• Timing
4/19/2013
47
PENCIL TESTContinuity of barriers
¾ Building�Enclosure�Commissioning�specification�¾ Coordinate�all�BECx relationships�and�aspects�of�the�project.�
¾ The�BECx specification�should�clarify�the�field�testing�and�shall�be�included�in�the�Project�Manual,�Section�1,�in�coordination�with�specifications�addressing:
¾ Contractor�Quality�Assurance�and�Control¾ Moisture�Prevention�Procedures�during�Construction¾ Building�Enclosure�Performance�Requirements�(inclusive�of�the�Air�Barrier)¾ Testing�and�Inspection�Services¾ Project�specific�Substitution�Request�Form�for�building�enclosure�
components.�
Building�Enclosure�Cx Specification
4/19/2013
48
SECTION�01��91�13BUILDING�ENCLOSURE�COMMISSIONINGGENERAL
1.1 WORK�INCLUDED
• Commissioning�requirements�common�to�all�Exterior�EnclosureͲRelated�Sections.• Validation of�proper�and�thorough�installation�of�Exterior�Enclosure�components.�• Documentation�of�tests,�procedures,�and�installations.• Coordination�and�requirements�for�field�mockͲup,�trial�installation�and�Functional�Performance�Testing�
events.
1.2 GENERAL�DESCRIPTION
A. Statement�of�Exterior�Enclosure�Design�Intent�(EEDI):
B. Exterior�Enclosure�Commissioning�(EECx)�is�the�process�of�ensuring�that�all�building�enclosure�components�are�installed�and�perform�collectively�according�to�the�EEDI�and�that�the�installation�is�adequately�tested�and�that�the�specified�performance�is�verified�and�documented.��
It�serves�as�a�tool�to�identify�deficiencies�in�the�building�enclosure�during�the�preconstruction�and�construction�phases�in�an�effort�to�advance�the�building�enclosure�components�from�mockͲup�installations,�through�installation�of�the�separate�components�on�the�structure,�to�a�fully�integrated,�weatherͲtight�assembly�prior�to�occupancy,�thereby�reducing�impact�on�the�building�end�user.
C. The�Exterior�Enclosure�Commissioning�Coordinator (EECxC)
…�focus�is�on�quality�assurance…�¾ BECx PreͲDesign�Phase�¾ BECx Design�Phase�
¾ BECx PreͲConstruction�Phase�(Not�required�by�the�Guideline�3�Process)MockͲUp�Shop�Drawing�and�Submittal�Review�AssistanceObservation�of�MockͲup�and�Performance�TestingPreconstruction�MockͲup�Performance�Testing
¾ BECx Construction�Phase�Services�
¾ BECx Occupancy�and�Operation
PreͲConstruction�Phase
Laboratory�Performance�MockͲUp
Allows�for�evaluation�of�the�design�prior�to�wide�spread�construction
4/19/2013
49
MockͲUp�Process�Ͳ Visits�to�Fabrication�Plant
BECxA can�visit�the�shop�where�the�curtain�wall�is�being�fabricated.�Components�are�shipped�to�the�testing�laboratory�and�erected.�Complete�laboratory�testing�in�accordance�with�ASTM�E2099.�Susceptible�details�are�reviewed�and�tested�for�air,�water�leakage�and�potential�to�develop�condensation.
Tests�for�water,�air�and�structure�per�ASTM�E�2099Ͳ00(2007)�Standard�Practice�for�the�Specification�and�Evaluation�of�PreͲConstruction�Laboratory�Mockups�of�Exterior�Wall�Systems,�performed�by�qualified�independent�test�lab.
Typical�test�sequence:
¾ Static�Air�Infiltration�Test�(ASTM�E283)¾ Static�Water�Test�(ASTM�E331)¾ Dynamic�Water�Test�(AAMA�501.1Ͳ83)¾ Uniform�Load�Test�(ASTM�E330)¾ Static�Water�Test�(ASTM�E331)�¾ Interstory�Drift�/�Lateral�and�Vertical�Movement�
(AAMA�501.4Ͳ200)¾ Static�Water�Test�(ASTM�E331)¾ Thermal�Cycle�(AAMA�501.5)�¾ Dynamic�Water�Test�(AAMA�501.1Ͳ83)¾ Structural�Overload�Test�¾ Thermal�Resistance�Test�(AAMA�1503)
MockͲup�Performance�Testing
MockͲup�Report�/�Action�Items
4/19/2013
50
…�focus�is�on�quality�assurance…�¾ BECx PreͲDesign�Phase¾ BECx Design�Phase�¾ BECx PreͲConstruction�Phase�
…�focus�switch�to�quality�control�&�validation…
¾ BECx Construction�Phase��Shop�Drawing�and�Submittal�ReviewDevelopment�of�ChecklistsPreͲConstruction�BE�Commissioning�MeetingBuilding�Enclosure�Trade�Coordination/PreͲConstruction�MeetingsPeriodic�OnͲSite�“Construction�Milestone”�ObservationPerformance�TestingBuilding�Enclosure�Commissioning�Construction�MeetingsClose�Out�Report
¾ BECx Occupancy�and�Operation�Phase�
The�ProcessSubmittal�Reviews
• TechnicallyͲfocused�review�of�the�building�enclosure�submittals
• Meet�performance�objective�/�OPR?
• Interface�with�design�and�construction�team– Performance�and�constructability�of�details
– Impacts�to�schedule�and�cost�
– Durability�– Compatibility�/�Adhesion– Coordination�between�submittals
Construction�Check�Lists1.2 GENERAL�DESCRIPTIONC. The�Building�Enclosure�Commissioning�
Authority�(BECxA) shall�work�with�the�Contractor�and�Contractor’s�Quality�Assurance�and�Quality�Control�Plan�and�personnel�to�oversee�the�BECx processes�and�performance�testing.��The�BECxA will�observe�tests�as�deemed�appropriate.��All�required�testing�will�be�performed�and�paid�for�by�the�Owner.
• Development�&�Refinement�of�Check�Lists�with�assistance�of�trades
• Individual�Trade�PreͲcon�Meetings
• Collaborative�contractor,�subcontractor�and�BECxAquality�oriented�review�of�work
4/19/2013
51
During�construction• Moisture�Management�Plan
Construction�Water
• Protection�of�Equipment�&�Materials
Management�Protocols:Cx Authority�Role�In�Directives
• CA�is�Advisory• CA�can�not�direct�AE�or�direct�work�during�Construction�Phase
• Construction�directive�protocols�and�procedures�are�not�changed�due�to�a�formal�Cx process
• Deficiencies�identified�by�CA�are�submitted�for�information�only.��Contractor�may�react�to�them�but�is�not�obligated.– “Part�1.8.2�Ͳ Deficiencies�Identified�by�the�BECxA”
4/19/2013
52
Construction�Phase
• Development�&�Refinement�of�Installation��Check�Lists�with�assistance�of�trades
• Individual�Trade�PreͲcon�Meetings
• Collaborative�A/E,�contractor,�subcontractor�and�BECxA quality�oriented�review�of�work
Jobsite�BECx�Activities
• On�site�Construction�Observation,�• Verification�of�Checklist�implementation• Discussion�of�Issues�with�GC’s�QC�
Coordinator�on�site• Development�of�Field�Sketches�for�
unforeseen�conditions�/�Design�“Refinement”�for�AͲoͲR�consideration
• Coordination�of�BECx meetings• Observation�of�Field�Testing�&�
Documentation
• Safety�Awareness�
Construction�Observation
4/19/2013
53
¾ Tracking�of�field�deficiencies�and�“open/closed”�action�item�logs
¾ Assemble�Building�Enclosure�CxReport
¾ BECx�Field�Meetings
Action�Item�No.�38System�Reviewed:�WaterproofingDate:�23�May 2008Area�Reviewed: NW�Reentrant�Corner (Column�Line C:�1�to�3�and�Column�Line�3:�A�to�C), Ground�FloorWeather: 60�Deg�F�/ Mostly�CloudyWJE�Rep:�MKPresent: GC�(DB &�JM)
Description:WJE�observed unprotected�waterproofing�membrane�that�included�the�following�deficiencies: 1)�large�pockets�of�water�beneath�the�waterproofing�membrane;�2)�tears�at�slab�edge transitions�along�the perimeter�of�the�first�floor�slab;�3)�exposure�to�excessive�debris�including�welding�rods,�miscellaneous�metals�(some�partially�melted�into�the�waterproofing�membrane),�and�concrete�debris.�
It�is�important�to�note�that�the large�pockets�of�water observed�beneath�the�waterproof�membrane�currently�appear�to�be�isolated to areas�outboard�of�the�precast�concrete�panels.�WJE�continues�to�recommend�that�all�exposed�waterproofing�membrane is�protected�from�onͲgoing work�in�these�and�adjacent�areas. GC�to�confirm�that�these deficiencies�are�repaired�and�that�protection�will�be�provided.
Documentation�of�Observations
Types�of�Testing?• Air�Infiltration• Water�Infiltration• Water�Absorption• Structural�Load• Seismic�Racking• Thermal�Performance• Acoustics
• Accelerated�Aging• Membrane�Adhesion• Sealant�Adhesion• Anchor�PullͲout• Infrared�Thermography
• Whole�Building�Air�Tightness
The�Process• project�specific�&�
comprehensive
• demonstrate�that�each�Building�Enclosure�system,�and�system�to�system�interfaces�meet�or�exceed�the�performance�requirements�of�the�OPR,�Contract�Documents�and�the�Building�Enclosure�Design�Intent
• random�selection
• early�in�construction
Performance�Tests
4/19/2013
54
Performance CriteriaDefining Air Tightness Performance:
Curtain wall and skylights have an allowable air leakage0.06 cfm ft2 at 6.24psf in accordance with ASTM E283Standard Test Method for Determining Rate of Air LeakageThrough Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, and Doors UnderSpecified Pressure Differences Across the Specimen.
The industry standard organization, AAMA typically allowsfor an increase in air leakage allowance of 150% of designconditions. This equates to an installed air leakageallowance of 0.09 cfm ft2 at 6.24psf. Field Testing shall beperformed in accordance with ASTM E783 Standard TestMethod for Field Measurement of Air Leakage ThroughInstalled Exterior Windows and Doors
Defining�water�leakage:• Definition�of�water�leakage�per�AAMA�and�ASTM,�
allows�water�leakage�that�enters�the�interior,�but�does�not�penetrate�beyond�the�inner�most�plane�of�the�framing�to�be�considered�a�“pass”.
• AAMA�502Ͳ08�Voluntary�Specification�for�Field�Testing�of�Newly�Installed�Fenestration�Products,�parallels�ASTM�E1105’s�definition�of�water�leakage.
• AAMA�503�Ͳ08�Voluntary�Specification�for�Field�Testing�of�Newly�Installed�Storefronts,�Curtain�Walls�and�Sloped�Glazing�Systems�allows�for�up�to�½�oz�of�water�to�collect�on�top�of�an�interior�frame�surface�and�does�not�spill�over�to�be�considered�a�“pass”�.
**�Define�leakage�in�accordance�with�your�own�assessment�of�the�risk�and�long�term�durability.�Is�any�water�to�the�interior�side�of�the�framing�system�acceptable?
Performance Criteria
Defining�Pressure�Differential:�Penetration�resistance�determined�per�ASTM�E1105�/AAMA�503Ͳ08�states:4.3.1�Water�penetration�resistance�tests�shall�be�conducted�at�a�
static�pressure�of�2/3�(0.667)�of�the�specified�project�water�penetration�test�pressure�but�not�less�than�4.18psf.�(approx.�40mph�wind)
AAMA�502Ͳ08�4.3.�Water�penetration�resistance�tests�shall�be�conducted�at�a�
static�pressure�of�2/3�(0.667)�of�the�specified�project�water�penetration�test�pressure�but�not�less�than�1.19psf.�(approx.�28mph�wind)�
Example:�A�product�rated�as�CͲ50�shall�be�field�tested�at�a�pressure�differential�of�(.15)(50)=7.50�psf�x�0.667=5.00�psf
The�issue�of�the�“TwoͲThirds�rule”:• AAMA�allows�a�reduction�from�the�lab�test�pressure�to�the�
field.�• AAMA�outlines�this�as�“reasonable�adjustment�for�
differences�between�a�laboratory�test�environment�and�a�field�test�environment”.�
• AAMA�502Ͳ08�and�503Ͳ08�allow�the�architect�to�waive�this�requirement�in�favor�of�field�testing�at�the�static/cyclic�full�design�pressure�differential�specified�under�Performance�Requirements�of�the�appropriate�specification�section.
**Clearly�identify�in�the�specifications�the�design�pressure�and�field�test�criteria�to�avoid�confusion.�
Performance Criteria
4/19/2013
55
Testing�for�air�infiltration
ASTM�E283:�Standard�Test�Method�for�Determining�Rate�of�Air�Leakage�Through�Exterior�Windows,�Curtain�Walls,�and�Doors�Under�Specified�Pressure�Differences�Across�the�Specimen
4.1�“The�test�consists�of�sealing�a�test�specimen�into�or�against�one�face�of�an�air�chamber,�supplying�air�to�or�exhausting�air�from�the�chamber�at�the�rate�required�to�maintain�the�specified�test�pressure�difference�across�the�specimen,�and�measuring�the�resultant�air�flow�through�the�specimen.”�
Tare bag
Testing�for�air�infiltrationAir�infiltration�is�determined�by�a�calibrated�high�precision�mass�flow�meter.�The�specimen�is�subjected�to�a�constant�air�pressure�differential.�
The�difference�in�air�leakage�amounts�detected�after�considering�barometric�pressure�and�air�temperature�provides�the�total�air�infiltration.�
Test�results�determine�a�Pass/Fail�rating�based�upon�preͲdetermined�criteria.
Flow
meter Smoke bottle tests for air leak locations combined with pressurizing chamber
ASTM�E331:�Standard�Test�Method�for�Water�penetration�of�Exterior�Windows,�Skylights,�Doors,�and�Curtain�Walls�by�Uniform�Static�Air�Pressure�Difference
4.1�“This�test�method�consists�of�sealing�the�test�specimen�into�or�against�one�face�of�an�air�chamber,�supplying�air�to�or�exhausting�air�from�the�chamber�at�the�rate�required�to�maintain�the�specified�test�pressure�difference�across�the�specimen,�while�spraying�water�onto�the�outdoor�face�of�the�specimen�at�the�required�rate�and�observing�any�water�penetration.”�
Comparison of Water Test Pressure with Wind Speed
Testing�for�water�leakage
4/19/2013
56
Testing�for�water�leakage
Water�resistance�tests�are�performed�on�specimens�to�check�for�water�penetration�under�cyclic�and�static�air�pressure.�The�air�pressure�is�intended�to�simulate�actual�natural�weather�characteristics�such�as�normal�and�extreme�rainstorm�with�wind�events.�
The�spray�rack�is�calibrated�to�deliver�water�application�against�the�exterior�surface�of�the�specimen�at�a�rate�of�3.4L/m2min�(5.0�U.S.�gal/sf/hr)�at�the�required�cycle�and�pressure�conditions.�
Predetermined�criteria�for�water�penetration�determines�the�pass/fail�result.
Calibrated spray rack
Observe for leaks at interior of chamber
Dynamic test AAMA 501.1-05 Standard Test Method for Exterior Windows, Curtain Walls, and Doors for Water Penetration Using Dynamic Pressure
Structural�Performance�Test
ASTM�E330:�Standard�Test�method�for�Structural�performance�of�Exterior�Windows,�Curtain�walls,�and�Doors�by�Uniform�Static�Air�pressure�Difference
4.1�“This�test�method�consists�of�sealing�the�test�specimen�into�or�against�one�face�of�an�air�chamber,�supplying�air�to�or�exhausting�air�from�the�chamber�according�to�a�specific�test�loading�program,�at�the�rate�required�to�maintain�the�test�pressure�difference�across�the�specimen,�and�observing,�measuring,�and�recording�the�deflection,�deformations,�and�nature�of�any�distress�or�failures�of�the�specimen.”
Exterior view of chamber under seismic loading of 1.4” lateral
4/19/2013
57
Structural�Performance�Test
A�uniform�load�structural�test�determines�the�specimen’s�strength�under�positive�and�negative�airͲpressure�loads.�
The�results�are�determined�by�using�gauges,�occasionally�digital�instrumentation,�which�measures�permanent�set�and�deflection�readings�under�ratios�established�by�the�standard�and/or�Professional�Engineer.�
Structural�load�resistance�tests�may�also�include�blast,�impact�test,�and�seismic�or�other�depending�on�Owner�Project�Requirements
Hydraulic jacks create movement of the chamber structure to induce load
Gauges measure movement of the specimen
Thermal�testingAAMA�501�:�Methods�of�Tests�for�Exterior�Walls�(Optional�Test�AAMA�501.5�– Thermal�Cycling)Thermal�cycling�test�temperatures�shall�be�selected�to�meet�the�expected�job�conditions,�but�if�these�are�not�known,�the�standard�test�conditions�shall�be�utilized.�Three�thermal�cycles�are�performed.�
Typically,�this�test�is�a�part�of�the�ASTM�E2099�test�sequence,�followed�by�air�and�water�infiltration�resistance�testing�in�accordance�with�ASTM�E283�(optional)�and�ASTM�E331�(at�a�minimum)�respectively.�
AAMA�1503:Voluntary�Test�Method�for�Thermal�Transmittance�and�Condensation�Resistance�of�Windows,�Doors�and�Glazed�Wall�Sections
The�AAMA�1503�test�method�is�based�on�ASTM�methodology.��The�UͲfactor�is�determined�under�winter,�nightͲtime�conditions�which�simulate�different�temperatures�on�the�interior�and�exterior�sides�of�the�sample.�(interior:�70�degrees�F,�exterior:�0�degrees�F).��An�exterior�surface�coefficient�is�established�which�is�based�on�a�15�mph�wind.�Readings�using�thermocouples�are�taken�at�various�locations�on�glazing�and�framing.
Typically�this�test�is�performed�on�individual�products�of�a�standard�size�for�comparison�of�CRF.
4/19/2013
58
Fenestration:�Condensation�Resistance
Specified Condensation Resistance Requirements:
Condensation resistance (AAMA 1503-985) at winterdesign conditions:0 degrees F exterior and 15mph wind velocity, 68 degreesF interior temperature and 30% Relative Humidity. Nocondensation or surface temperatures at or below the dewpoint.
The�ProcessField�Air�Tests�– Glazed�assemblies�&�Interfaces
ASTM�E783 Standard�Test�Method�for�Field�Measurement�of�Air�Leakage�Through�Installed�Exterior�Windows�and�Doors
The�ProcessField�Water�Tests�– Glazed�assemblies�&�Interfaces
ASTM�EͲ1105Ͳ00(2008)�Standard�Test�Method�for�Field�Determination�of�Water�Penetration�of�Installed�Exterior�Windows,�Curtain�Walls,�and�Doors�by�Uniform�or�Cyclic�Static�Air�Pressure�Differential.�
4/19/2013
59
The�ProcessField�Water�Tests�– Glazed�assemblies�&�Interfaces
AAMA�501.2�Standard�Test�Method�for�Field�Determination�of�Water�Penetration�of�Installed�Exterior�Windows,�Curtain�Walls,�and�Doors�by�Uniform�or�Cyclic�Static�Air�Pressure�Differential.�
The�ProcessField�Water�Tests�– Glazed�assemblies�&�Interfaces
AAMA�501.1Ͳ05�Standard�Test�Method�for�Exterior�Windows,�Curtain�Walls,�and�Doors�for�Water�Penetration�Using�Dynamic�Pressure�–Modified�for�Field�Use
The�ProcessField�Air�Tests�– Air�Barrier� ASTM�E1186 – (2009)�Standard�Practices�for�Air�Leakage�Site�Detection�in�Building�Envelopes�and�Air�Barrier�Systems
4/19/2013
60
Backer Rod
width : depth2 : 1
Sealantdepth
width
(1/4 in. < B < 1/2 in.)
Perform�field�adhesion�tests
Sealant�Pull�Test
The�ProcessField�Air�Tests�– Roof
ASTM�E1186 Standard�Practices�for�Air�Leakage�Site�Detection�in�Building�Envelopes�and�Air�Barrier�Systems
The�ProcessField�High�Voltage�Electronic�Leak�detection�–Roofing�and�Planter�waterproofing
4/19/2013
61
The�ProcessField�Water�Tests�–Water�proofing
ASTM�DͲ5957Ͳ98(2005):�Standard�Guide�for�Flood�Testing�Horizontal�Waterproofing�Installations�
Project�Specific�Tests�
ASTM�D4541�Ͳ 09�Standard�Test�Method�for�PullͲOff�Strength�of�Coatings�Using�Portable�Adhesion�Testers
ASTM�C1521�Ͳ 09e1�Standard�Practice�for�Evaluating�Adhesion�of�Installed�Weatherproofing�Sealant�Joints.�
PostͲConstruction�Building�Enclosure�–Air�Tightness
ASTM�E1827�Standard�Test�Methods�for�Determining�Airtightness of�Buildings�Using�an�Orifice�Blower�Door�
Result:�(Enclosure,�including�basement)0.12�cfm/�ft2 at�a�pressure�differential�of�0.3”�w.g.(75�Pa)�
Result:�(Enclosure,�without�basement)0.2�cfm/�ft2 at�a�pressure�differential�of�0.3”�w.g.(75�Pa)
Testing�undertaken�as�part�of�ASHRAE�1478TRP�“Measuring�AirͲTightness�of�Mid�and�High�Rise�NonͲResidential�Buildings”.�Results�courtesy�of�Gary�Nelson�&�Collin�Olsen.�Much�thanks�to�entire�WID�team,�Terry�Brennan�&�Wagdy�Anis.
4/19/2013
62
Criteria
• ASHRAE• 0.1cfm/sf at�75Pa��– “tight”• 0.25cfm/sf at�75Pa�–“average”
• 0.6cfm/sf at�75Pa�– “leaky”• USACE�Ͳ 0.25cfm/sf at�75Pa�• GSA�– 0.4cfm/sf at�75Pa• IECC�Standard�– 7ACH�at�50Pa�for�residential
• DOE�Building�America�–0.25cfm/sf at�50Pa
Results33,901�cfm /�173,104�sf =�
0.2cfm/sf at�75Pa�(above�grade)
33,901�cfm /�260,797�sf =�0.13cfm/sf at�75Pa�(above�grade�+�below�grade)
3,235�sq.in.�of�leakage�area�at�10Pa
Diagnostics
4/19/2013
63
…�focus�is�on�quality�assurance…�¾ BECx PreͲDesign�Phase�¾ BECx PreͲDesign�Phase�
¾ BECx PreͲConstruction�Phase
¾ BECx Construction�Phase�
…�focus�switch�to�Owner�training�&�maintenance…
¾ BECx Occupancy�and�Operation�PhaseFinalize�BE�part�of�Total�Cx Report;�Cx process�Documentation,�including�Copies�of��Reports,�Photos,�Sketches,��and�Validation�of�Performance�TestsBuilding�Enclosure�Operation�&�Maintenance�ManualOnͲsite�training�of�Owner�personnelReview�Enclosure�Prior�to�Warranty�Expiration
Close�Out�Report
BECx Post�ConstructionDuring�the�Occupancy�and�Operations�Phase,�the�onͲgoing�operation,�maintenance,�and�modification�of�the�facility�systems�and�assemblies,�and�their�associated�documentation,�are�verified�against�the�updated�Owner’s�Project�Requirement
4/19/2013
64
Post�Construction�testing
Although�useful�to�diagnose�issues�and�perform�qualitative�reviews,�testing�after�the�building�enclosure�is�complete�is�not�useful�in�the�overall�schedule�and�mission�to�achieve�the�OPR.�
Adapt�tests�to�validate�performance�and�undertake�early�in�the�construction�process.
Transition�to�Operations
• Not�a�requirement�of�LEED�but�should�be:– Implementation�of�measurement�and�verification�plan
– Building�optimization– Verification�of�operators�understanding�of�building�operation�&�what�O&M�activities�affects�its�performance
Facility�Engineer�Training
BECxA performs�the�training�of�the�facility�maintenance�personnel.
Educate�the�Owner�to�properly�maintain�the�building�enclosure.
Keep�the�Owner�and�occupants�happy.�
4/19/2013
65
Case�Study:Arthur�M�Blank�Building
Arthur�M�Blank�OPR• Vision
– French�chateau�built�50�years�providing�the�feeling�of�home
– Function�as�office�and�meeting�space
– Constructed�to�last�several�hundred�years�
– Provide�25%�of�total�constructed�office�space�as�unfinished�for�future�use
• Envelope�Integrity
– Residential�style�wood�windows�and�doors
– No�allowable�moisture�intrusion�(except�hurricane�or�tornado)
Arthur�M�Blank�OPR• Owner�Directives
– Provide�the�highest�quality,�finest�materials�and�best�design�and�construction�
– Minimize�environmental�impact– Provide�an�environment�that�promotes�productivity������and�a�feeling�of�
home– Achieve�LEED�Certification– Provide�an�example�of�how�to�develop�a�high�performance�building�that�
developers�could�follow• Cost�effective�realistic�solutions• Practical�application�of�sustainable�development�principles
4/19/2013
66
Arthur�M�Blank�OPR• Occupant�requirements
– Minimal�noise�levels�from�exterior�and�internal�spaces
– Excellent�visual�quality�and�thermal�comfort
– High�security�24�hours�a�day
– Connectivity�and�access�to�secured�outside�area
– Operable�windows
• Window�operation�approved�by�building�operator
Arthur�M�Blank�OPR• Operation�and�Maintenance
– Easy�access�to�perform�preventative�maintenance
– Staff• One�engineering�educated�operator�with�minimum�10�years�operation�experience
• Two�custodial�staff
Arthur�M.�Blank�Family�Office
• World�Class�Delivery�Team• Team�had�never�utilized�commissioning�before�and�was�unsure�
what�to�expect• Team�had�not�previously�applied�sustainable�development�
principles• Team�and�owner�were�dedicated�to�meeting�the�OPR�
4/19/2013
67
AMBFO• Commissioning�Scope
– Building�Envelope• Roof• Fenestration• Hardscapes• Above�and�Below�Grade�Wall�Assemblies
• Penetrations– Louvers– Piping
– LEED�Certification
AMBFO
– HVAC– Electrical
• Distribution systems• Lighting
– Plumbing• Fixtures• Rainwater collection• Irrigation• Storm water
CxGBS�ResponsibilitiesPreͲDesign• Owner’s�Project�Requirements
– Meeting�to�gather�data– Draft�document
• Scoping�meeting
• Design�Phase�Commissioning�Plan
• Design�Checklists
• Basis�of�Design�document�requirements
Design• SD�Design�review• DD�Design�review• CD�Design�review• Commissioning�Specs• Update�Owner’s�Project�
Requirements
4/19/2013
68
Design�Team�ResponsibilitiesPreͲDesign• Program
• Team�Contact�Info
• Project�Schedule
• Comments�on�Owner’s�Project�Requirements
Design• SD�Documents
– Basis�of�Design– Schematic�Drawings– Design�Review�responses
• DD�Documents– Design�Drawings– Specifications– Design�Review�responses
• Construction�Drawings– Design�Review�Responses
AMBFO�Design�Phase�Cx�Plan• Design�Reviews
– Schematic�Design– Design�Development– Construction�Documents�(95%)– Back�check
• Disciplines�Reviewed– Civil– Architectural�Building�Envelope– Mechanical,�Electrical,�Plumbing– Integration�of�sustainable�goals�
Design�Phase�Cx�Plan• Roles�&�Responsibilities
– LEED�Consultant�develops,�in�collaboration�with�project�team,�environmental�strategy
• Sustainable�opportunities�that�coincides• Energy�&�water�efficiency�goals
– Number�and�timing�of�Design�Reviews• Information�required�from�designers�at�each�stage
– Cx�Design�Checklists– Basis�of�Design– Level�of�detail�at�each�stage�of�review
• Review�process• Adjudication
4/19/2013
69
AMBFO�Design�Phase�Cx• Purpose�of�review
– Achievement�of�OPR– Assess�the�design�teams�implementation�of�a�quality�control�process
– Identification�of�systemic�problems– Reduce�risk
• Moisture�intrusion• Change�order�opportunities
– Provide�quality�assurance
AMBFO�Design�Phase�Cx
AMBFO�Design�Phase�Cx
4/19/2013
70
AMBFO�Design�Phase�Cx
AMBFO�Design�Phase�Cx
• Integration�of�commissioning�into�the�construction�process�– General�Commissioning�Requirements– Building�Envelope�Testing�Requirements– Construction�Checklists– Test�procedures
See NIBS/ASHRAE Guideline 3 Annex L.4
Construction�Phase• Conduct�scoping�meeting
– Review�Cx�process• Team�roles�and�responsibilities• Purpose�of�observations• Purpose�&�utilization�of�construction�checklists• Testing• Training• Scheduling�of�Cx�activates�into�project�schedule
4/19/2013
71
Construction�Phase��Cx• Observations
– Identify�issues�early– Document�issue– Obtain�team�solution– Do�it�right�the�1st time
Observations
Observations
4/19/2013
77
Successful�Projects• Arthur�M.�Blank�Family�Office�(completed�4/2003)
– 1st LEED�Gold�Certification– 35%�more�efficient�than�
ASHRAE�90.1Ͳ1999– Landscape�irrigation�100%�
from�rainwater– 26%�reduction�in�potable�
water�usage– 74.6%�of�construction�waste�
recycled– Thermal�Comfort– Daylight�&�Views
Arthur�M.�Blank�Family�Office• Energy�Savings
– 40%�reduction�in�energy�consumption�saving�$114,000/yr
• Water�Savings– $6,500/yr�water�savings�2.6�yr�ROI
• O&M�Savings– 40%�reduction�in�custodial�costs�saving�
$40,000/yr
Arthur�M.�Blank�Family�Office• Reduced�Risk
– Priceless
• Cost�for�LEED�certification�and�Holistic�Commissioning�$118,000– Whole�building�commissioning
• Building�envelope,�energy�consuming�systems,�plumbing
– LEED�Documentation�&�Certification
4/19/2013
78
General��questions?
• How�much�does�BECx add�to�a�project?• Design/Build�and�Cx?• Future�of�the�BECx industry?• RFQs�and�RFPs• Other
Useful�links�to�develop�building�enclosure�and�BECx knowledge:
www.wbdg.org/Whole�Building�Design�Guide�(WBDG):�A�comprehensive�guide�for�exterior�envelope�design�and�construction�for�institutional�/�office�buildings.
http://www.nibs.org/National�Institute�of�Building�Sciences�(NIBS)
http://www.becͲnational.org/Building�Enclosure�Councils�(BEC):�The�BECs�are�charged�with�providing�a�forum�for�the�construction�industry�on�the�crucial�area�of�building�enclosures. BECs�currently�exist�in�30�cities�around�USA.�
http://www.becxͲc.com/A�source�for�information�on�the�quality�and�performance�of�building�enclosures�by�providing�resources,�education,�and�information�about�the�current�status�of�the�industry�that�will�be�useful�to�building�owners,�facility�managers,�contractors,�designers,�and�commissioning�professionals.�
QUESTIONS�OR�COMMENTS,�PLEASE�CONTACT�:
JAY�ENCK:�[email protected]
FIONA�ALDOUS:�[email protected]