building information - buckeye local sd 45856 - edgewood
TRANSCRIPT
Building Information - Buckeye Local SD (45856) - Edgewood High School
Program Type Expedited Local Partnership Program (ELPP)
Setting Rural
Assessment Name Edgewood_High_School_2008_Assessment_April_2019_EEA_02_11_20
Assessment Date (on-site; non-EEA) 2008-04-14
Kitchen Type Full Kitchen
Cost Set: 2019
Building Name Edgewood High School
Building IRN 9936
Building Address 2428 Blake Rd
Building City Ashtabula
Building Zipcode 44004
Building Phone (440) 997-5301
Acreage 49.00
Current Grades: 9-12
Teaching Stations 43
Number of Floors 2
Student Capacity 744
Current Enrollment 511
Enrollment Date 2019-04-25
Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken.
Number of Classrooms 26
Historical Register NO
Building’s Principal Michael Notar
Building Type High
Next Page
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Building Information - Buckeye Local SD (45856) - Edgewood High School Page 1
Building Pictures - Buckeye Local SD(45856) - Edgewood High School(9936)
North elevation photo: East elevation photo:
South elevation photo: West elevation photo:
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
124,318 Total Existing Square Footage
1961,1961,1972 Building Dates
9-12 Grades
511 Current Enrollment
43 Teaching Stations
49.00 Site Acreage
Edgewood High School is a 124,318 sq.ft. facility located in a rural residential and agricultural setting on a relatively flat 49-acre site with moderate tree and shrub typelandscaping. The site is bordered by moderately traveled county roads. Average classroom size is slightly undersized at 860 sq.ft. when compared to the 900 sq.ft. Ohio SchoolDesign Manual guideline. The overall facility’s ventilation system is not capable of providing Ohio Building Code fresh air requirements. No foundation walls were exposed at thetime of this assessment. The overall facility has a combination of a brick veneer on a masonry load bearing wall system and a steel framed system. Interior walls are concretemasonry unit, glazed block and metal stud framed partitions with gypsum board. Floor construction of the base floor of the overall facility is concrete slab-on-grade typeconstruction. Floor construction of the intermediate floors of the 1961 original construction is metal deck steel joist type construction. Roof construction of the overall facility ismetal deck on steel joist type construction. The facility contains security cameras and motion sensors. The facility contains a fire alarm system but does not contain an automaticfire suppression system. The building has ADA accessibility compliant features, but is not ADA compliant throughout. Multiple entrances onto the site provide proper separation ofbus and other vehicular traffic, and one-way bus traffic is provided. There is a curbside bus loading and unloading zone in front of the school, which is separated from othervehicular traffic. Adequate parking for staff, visitors, and students is provided. Parking for the disabled is not adequately provided. Athletic facilities are comprised of multipurposefields, football field and track facility, baseball field, and softball field. Site features are suitable for outdoor instruction, though no related equipment has been provided. Thebuilding contains four corridor security grilles which when in the closed position create dead-end corridor conditions. The site is shared with the district bus maintenance facility.
No Significant Findings
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Building Pictures - Buckeye Local SD(45856) - Edgewood High School(9936) Page 2
Previous Page
Next Page
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Building Pictures - Buckeye Local SD(45856) - Edgewood High School(9936) Page 3
Building Construction Information - Buckeye Local SD (45856) - Edgewood High School (9936)
Name Year Handicapped Access Floors Square Feet Non OSDM Addition Built Under ELPP
(01) 1961 Original Construction 1961 no 2 110,862 no no
(02) 1961 Auditorium 1961 no 1 7,764 yes no
(03) 1972 Addition (Media Center) 1972 no 1 5,692 no no
Previous Page
Next Page
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Building Construction Information - Buckeye Local SD (45856) - Edgewood High School (9936) Page 4
Building Component Information - Buckeye Local SD (45856) - Edgewood High School (9936)
AdditionAuditorium
Fixed Seating
CorridorsAgriculturalEducation
Lab
PrimaryGymnasium
MediaCenter
VocationalSpace
StudentDining
Kitchen NatatoriumIndoorTracks
AdultEducation
BoardOffices
OutsideAgencies
AuxiliaryGymnasium
(01) 1961 OriginalConstruction (1961)
20416 10199 908 4253 2043
(02) 1961 Auditorium (1961)
7764
(03) 1972 Addition(Media Center) (1972)
3279
Total 7,764 20,416 0 10,199 4,187 0 4,253 2,043 0 0 0 0 0 0
Master Planning Considerations
Previous Page
Next Page
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Building Component Information - Buckeye Local SD (45856) - Edgewood High School (9936) Page 5
Existing CT Programs for AssessmentNext Page
Previous Page
Program Type Program Name Related Space Square Feet
No Records Found
Legend:
Not in current design manual
In current design manual but missing from assessment
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53<Untitled> Page 6
Main Assessment Menu - Buckeye Local SD (45856) - Edgewood High School (9936)
Building Summary - Edgewood High School (9936)
District: Buckeye Local SD
Name: Edgewood High School
Address: 2428 Blake Rd
Ashtabula,OH 44004
Bldg. IRN: 9936
County: Ashtabula Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)
Contact: Michael Notar
Phone: (440) 997-5301
Date Prepared: 2008-04-14 By: ARL
Date Revised: 2020-02-13 By: Jeff Tuckerman
Current Grades 9-12 Acreage: 49.00
Proposed Grades N/A Teaching Stations: 43
Current Enrollment 511 Classrooms: 26
Projected Enrollment N/A
Addition Date HA Number of Floors
Current Square Feet
(01) 1961 Original Construction
1961 no 2 110,862
(02) 1961 Auditorium 1961 no 1 7,764
(03) 1972 Addition (Media Center)
1972 no 1 5,692
Total 124,318
*HA = Handicapped Access
*Rating =1 Satisfactory
=2 Needs Repair
=3 Needs Replacement
*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction
FACILITY ASSESSMENTCost Set: 2019 Rating
Dollar Assessment C
A. Heating System 3 $4,305,594.00 -
B. Roofing 3 $770,188.10 -
C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 1 $0.00 -
D. Electrical Systems 3 $2,017,681.14 -
E. Plumbing and Fixtures 2 $520,017.00 -
F. Windows 3 $983,340.00 -
G. Structure: Foundation 1 $0.00 -
H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 2 $231,487.50 -
I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 1 $0.00 -
J. General Finishes 3 $3,957,495.22 -
K. Interior Lighting 3 $808,067.00 -
L. Security Systems 3 $678,624.30 -
M. Emergency/Egress Lighting 2 $12,750.00 -
N. Fire Alarm 3 $279,715.50 -
O. Handicapped Access 3 $485,413.60 -
P. Site Condition 3 $1,054,593.20 -
Q. Sewage System 3 $167,850.00 -
R. Water Supply 2 $6,750.00 -
S. Exterior Doors 3 $76,500.00 -
T. Hazardous Material 3 $468,537.80 -
U. Life Safety 3 $537,226.60 -
V. Loose Furnishings 3 $757,601.00 -
W. Technology 3 $1,118,862.00 -
- X. Construction Contingency /Non-Construction Cost
- $4,699,972.93 -
Total $23,938,266.89
Suitability Appraisal Summary
Section Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category
Cover Sheet — — — —
1.0 The School Site 100 79 79% Satisfactory
2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 200 101 51% Borderline
3.0 Plant Maintainability 100 68 68% Borderline
4.0 Building Safety and Security 200 119 60% Borderline
5.0 Educational Adequacy 200 120 60% Borderline
6.0 Environment for Education 200 139 70% Satisfactory
LEED Observations — — — —
Commentary — — — —
Total 1000 626 63% Borderline
Enhanced Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates
C=Under Contract
Renovation Cost Factor 104.88%
Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $25,106,454.31
The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is
requested from a Master Plan.
Previous Page
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Main Assessment Menu - Buckeye Local SD (45856) - Edgewood High School (9936) Page 7
Main Assessment Menu - Buckeye Local SD (45856) - Edgewood High School (9936)
(01) 1961 Original Construction (1961) Summary
District: Buckeye Local SD
Name: Edgewood High School
Address: 2428 Blake Rd
Ashtabula,OH 44004
Bldg. IRN: 9936
County: Ashtabula Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)
Contact: Michael Notar
Phone: (440) 997-5301
Date Prepared: 2008-04-14 By: ARL
Date Revised: 2020-02-13 By: Jeff Tuckerman
Current Grades 9-12 Acreage: 49.00
Proposed Grades N/A Teaching Stations: 43
Current Enrollment 511 Classrooms: 26
Projected Enrollment N/A
Addition Date HA Number of Floors
Current Square Feet
(01) 1961 Original Construction
1961 no 2 110,862
(02) 1961 Auditorium 1961 no 1 7,764
(03) 1972 Addition (Media Center)
1972 no 1 5,692
Total 124,318
*HA = Handicapped Access
*Rating =1 Satisfactory
=2 Needs Repair
=3 Needs Replacement
*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction
FACILITY ASSESSMENTCost Set: 2019 Rating
Dollar Assessment C
A. Heating System 3 $3,880,170.00 -
B. Roofing 3 $567,384.90 -
C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 1 $0.00 -
D. Electrical Systems 3 $1,799,290.26 -
E. Plumbing and Fixtures 2 $520,017.00 -
F. Windows 3 $983,340.00 -
G. Structure: Foundation 1 $0.00 -
H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 2 $209,887.50 -
I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 1 $0.00 -
J. General Finishes 3 $3,254,050.86 -
K. Interior Lighting 3 $720,603.00 -
L. Security Systems 3 $626,818.70 -
M. Emergency/Egress Lighting 2 $5,850.00 -
N. Fire Alarm 3 $249,439.50 -
O. Handicapped Access 3 $465,822.40 -
P. Site Condition 3 $1,016,141.00 -
Q. Sewage System 3 $167,850.00 -
R. Water Supply 2 $6,750.00 -
S. Exterior Doors 3 $76,500.00 -
T. Hazardous Material 3 $384,016.20 -
U. Life Safety 3 $487,439.40 -
V. Loose Furnishings 3 $720,603.00 -
W. Technology 3 $997,758.00 -
- X. Construction Contingency /Non-Construction Cost
- $4,187,287.88 -
Total $21,327,019.60
Suitability Appraisal Summary
Section Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category
Cover Sheet — — — —
1.0 The School Site 100 79 79% Satisfactory
2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 200 101 51% Borderline
3.0 Plant Maintainability 100 68 68% Borderline
4.0 Building Safety and Security 200 119 60% Borderline
5.0 Educational Adequacy 200 120 60% Borderline
6.0 Environment for Education 200 139 70% Satisfactory
LEED Observations — — — —
Commentary — — — —
Total 1000 626 63% Borderline
Enhanced Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates
C=Under Contract
Renovation Cost Factor 104.88%
Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $22,367,778.15
The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is
requested from a Master Plan.
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Main Assessment Menu - Buckeye Local SD (45856) - Edgewood High School (9936) Page 8
Main Assessment Menu - Buckeye Local SD (45856) - Edgewood High School (9936)
(02) 1961 Auditorium (1961) Summary
District: Buckeye Local SD
Name: Edgewood High School
Address: 2428 Blake Rd
Ashtabula,OH 44004
Bldg. IRN: 9936
County: Ashtabula Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)
Contact: Michael Notar
Phone: (440) 997-5301
Date Prepared: 2008-04-14 By: ARL
Date Revised: 2020-02-13 By: Jeff Tuckerman
Current Grades 9-12 Acreage: 49.00
Proposed Grades N/A Teaching Stations: 43
Current Enrollment 511 Classrooms: 26
Projected Enrollment N/A
Addition Date HA Number of Floors
Current Square Feet
(01) 1961 Original Construction
1961 no 2 110,862
(02) 1961 Auditorium 1961 no 1 7,764
(03) 1972 Addition (Media Center)
1972 no 1 5,692
Total 124,318
*HA = Handicapped Access
*Rating =1 Satisfactory
=2 Needs Repair
=3 Needs Replacement
*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction
FACILITY ASSESSMENTCost Set: 2019 Rating
Dollar Assessment C
A. Heating System 3 $271,740.00 -
B. Roofing 3 $119,130.80 -
C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 1 $0.00 -
D. Electrical Systems 3 $126,009.72 -
E. Plumbing and Fixtures 2 $0.00 -
F. Windows 3 $0.00 -
G. Structure: Foundation 1 $0.00 -
H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 2 $21,600.00 -
I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 1 $0.00 -
J. General Finishes 3 $593,418.00 -
K. Interior Lighting 3 $50,466.00 -
L. Security Systems 3 $29,891.40 -
M. Emergency/Egress Lighting 2 $2,600.00 -
N. Fire Alarm 3 $17,469.00 -
O. Handicapped Access 3 $9,352.80 -
P. Site Condition 3 $0.00 -
Q. Sewage System 3 $0.00 -
R. Water Supply 2 $0.00 -
S. Exterior Doors 3 $0.00 -
T. Hazardous Material 3 $64,231.40 -
U. Life Safety 3 $28,726.80 -
V. Loose Furnishings 3 $0.00 -
W. Technology 3 $69,876.00 -
- X. Construction Contingency /Non-Construction Cost
- $343,126.48 -
Total $1,747,638.40
Suitability Appraisal Summary
Section Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category
Cover Sheet — — — —
1.0 The School Site 100 79 79% Satisfactory
2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 200 101 51% Borderline
3.0 Plant Maintainability 100 68 68% Borderline
4.0 Building Safety and Security 200 119 60% Borderline
5.0 Educational Adequacy 200 120 60% Borderline
6.0 Environment for Education 200 139 70% Satisfactory
LEED Observations — — — —
Commentary — — — —
Total 1000 626 63% Borderline
Enhanced Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates
C=Under Contract
Renovation Cost Factor 104.88%
Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $1,832,923.15
The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is
requested from a Master Plan.
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Main Assessment Menu - Buckeye Local SD (45856) - Edgewood High School (9936) Page 9
Main Assessment Menu - Buckeye Local SD (45856) - Edgewood High School (9936)
(03) 1972 Addition (Media Center) (1972) Summary
District: Buckeye Local SD
Name: Edgewood High School
Address: 2428 Blake Rd
Ashtabula,OH 44004
Bldg. IRN: 9936
County: Ashtabula Area: Northeastern Ohio (8)
Contact: Michael Notar
Phone: (440) 997-5301
Date Prepared: 2008-04-14 By: ARL
Date Revised: 2020-02-13 By: Jeff Tuckerman
Current Grades 9-12 Acreage: 49.00
Proposed Grades N/A Teaching Stations: 43
Current Enrollment 511 Classrooms: 26
Projected Enrollment N/A
Addition Date HA Number of Floors
Current Square Feet
(01) 1961 Original Construction
1961 no 2 110,862
(02) 1961 Auditorium 1961 no 1 7,764
(03) 1972 Addition (Media Center)
1972 no 1 5,692
Total 124,318
*HA = Handicapped Access
*Rating =1 Satisfactory
=2 Needs Repair
=3 Needs Replacement
*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction
FACILITY ASSESSMENTCost Set: 2019 Rating
Dollar Assessment C
A. Heating System 3 $153,684.00 -
B. Roofing 3 $83,672.40 -
C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 1 $0.00 -
D. Electrical Systems 3 $92,381.16 -
E. Plumbing and Fixtures 2 $0.00 -
F. Windows 3 $0.00 -
G. Structure: Foundation 1 $0.00 -
H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 2 $0.00 -
I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 1 $0.00 -
J. General Finishes 3 $110,026.36 -
K. Interior Lighting 3 $36,998.00 -
L. Security Systems 3 $21,914.20 -
M. Emergency/Egress Lighting 2 $4,300.00 -
N. Fire Alarm 3 $12,807.00 -
O. Handicapped Access 3 $10,238.40 -
P. Site Condition 3 $38,452.20 -
Q. Sewage System 3 $0.00 -
R. Water Supply 2 $0.00 -
S. Exterior Doors 3 $0.00 -
T. Hazardous Material 3 $20,290.20 -
U. Life Safety 3 $21,060.40 -
V. Loose Furnishings 3 $36,998.00 -
W. Technology 3 $51,228.00 -
- X. Construction Contingency /Non-Construction Cost
- $169,558.58 -
Total $863,608.90
Suitability Appraisal Summary
Section Points Possible Points Earned Percentage Rating Category
Cover Sheet — — — —
1.0 The School Site 100 79 79% Satisfactory
2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 200 101 51% Borderline
3.0 Plant Maintainability 100 68 68% Borderline
4.0 Building Safety and Security 200 119 60% Borderline
5.0 Educational Adequacy 200 120 60% Borderline
6.0 Environment for Education 200 139 70% Satisfactory
LEED Observations — — — —
Commentary — — — —
Total 1000 626 63% Borderline
Enhanced Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates
C=Under Contract
Renovation Cost Factor 104.88%
Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $905,753.01
The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this summary is
requested from a Master Plan.
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Main Assessment Menu - Buckeye Local SD (45856) - Edgewood High School (9936) Page 10
Facility Assessment
A. Heating System
Description: Heating system consists of eight natural gas fired hot water boilers installed in 1985 that are in fair condition. Combustion air does not meet OBCrequirements. Two natural gas fired roof top air units provide make up air to two science rooms when fume hoods are operating. The mediacenter and several support areas are served by a split system (D/X and hot water), air rooftop handler installed in 1982. Space comfort heating isprovided via unit ventilators. Heating water system pumps and piping specialties were installed in 1961 and are in fair condition. Controls arecombination DDC/pneumatic. DDC system was installed in 2002 and is linked to a central monitor in the Junior High School. The computer labscontain rooftop mounted condensing units supplying packaged wall mounted air conditioners. The administrative office area contains padmounted condensing units and a combination of wall mounted and window mounted air conditioning units. Heating system is near the end of itsservice life. The system is not capable of providing Ohio Building Code fresh air requirements. According to school officials, the site does notcontain underground fuel tanks.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Provide new overall heating system, including air conditioning, to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. Provide funding to convertexisting non-ducted system (1961 original construction and 1961 auditorium) to ducted air system.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
(01) 1961 OriginalConstruction (1961)110,862 ft²
(02) 1961Auditorium (1961)7,764 ft²
(03) 1972 Addition(Media Center) (1972)5,692 ft²
Sum Comments
HVAC System Replacement:
$27.00sq.ft. (of entirebuilding addition)
Required Required Required $3,356,586.00(includes demo of existing system andreconfiguration of piping layout and new controls, airconditioning)
Convert ToDucted System
$8.00sq.ft. (of entirebuilding addition)
Required Required $949,008.00(includes costs for vert. & horz. chases, cutopenings, soffits, etc. Must be used in addition toHVAC System Replacement if the existing HVACsystem is non-ducted)
Sum: $4,305,594.00$3,880,170.00 $271,740.00 $153,684.00
Natural gas boilers Classroom unit ventilators
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 11
Facility Assessment
B. Roofing
Description: The roof over the 1961 original construction is a combination of an asphalt built-up ballasted system, (no installation date was available at time ofassessment), and is in good to fair condition, and an EPDM fully adhered membrane system that was installed in 2005, 2006, and 2007, and is ingood condition. The roof over the 1961 auditorium is an asphalt built-up ballasted system, (no installation date was available at time ofassessment), and is in good to fair condition. The roof over the 1972 addition is an EPDM fully adhered membrane system that was installed in2007, and is in good condition. There are no district reports of current leaking. Signs of past leaking were observed during the physicalassessment. Access to the roof was gained by a combination of access door, roof hatch, and access ladder that are in good condition. Therewere observations of standing water on the roof. Metal cap flashings and copings are in good condition. Roof storm drainage is addressedthrough a combined system of roof drains, gutters, and downspouts, which are properly located, and in good condition. The roof is not equippedwith overflow roof drains though they will be required in areas of roof replacement. No problems requiring attention were encountered with anyroof penetrations. There are not any covered walkways attached to this structure. April 2019 Update: The OFCC guidelines for single plymembrane roofing is if that roof system exceeds 7 years it is recommended it be replaced. The roof over the 1972 Media Center Addition thatwas installed in 2007 now exceeds the 7 year replacement guidelines. Additional roof insulation will be required for all roof areas to meet LEEDSilver Certification Energy Efficiency Requirements.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: The asphalt built-up roofing system over the 1961 original construction and the 1961 auditorium requires replacement to meet Ohio SchoolDesign Manual guidelines for age of system and due to condition. To facilitate the school’s compliance with OBC, provide new overflow roofdrains in areas of roof replacement. April 2019 Update: Replace the roof on the 1972 Media Center Addition. Provide additional roof insulation on1961 Original Building, 1961 Auditorium Addition and 1972 Media Center Addition.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
(01) 1961 OriginalConstruction (1961)110,862 ft²
(02) 1961Auditorium (1961)7,764 ft²
(03) 1972 Addition (MediaCenter) (1972)5,692 ft²
Sum Comments
Membrane (all types /fully adhered):
$10.00sq.ft. (Qty)
50,607 Required 7,764 Required 5,692 Required $640,630.00(unless under 10,000 sq.ft.)
Roof Insulation: $4.70sq.ft. (Qty)
5,067 Required 7,764 Required 5,692 Required $87,058.10(tapered insulation for limited areause to correct ponding)
Other: Overflow RoofDrain Assembly
$2,500.00per unit 15 Required 2 Required $42,500.00New overflow roof drain assembly.
Sum: $770,188.10 $567,384.90 $119,130.80 $83,672.40
Typical roof drain condition Typical roof hatch condition
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 12
Facility Assessment
C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning
Description: Heating system consists of eight natural gas fired hot water boilers installed in 1985 that are in fair condition. Combustion air does not meet OBCrequirements. Two natural gas fired roof top air units provide make up air to two science rooms when fume hoods are operating. The mediacenter and several support areas are served by a split system (D/X and hot water), air rooftop handler installed in 1982. Space comfort heating isprovided via unit ventilators. Heating water system pumps and piping specialties were installed in 1961 and are in fair condition. Controls arecombination DDC/pneumatic. DDC system was installed in 2002 and is linked to a central monitor in the Junior High School. The computer labscontain rooftop mounted condensing units supplying packaged wall mounted air conditioners. The administrative office area contains padmounted condensing units and a combination of wall mounted and window mounted air conditioning units. Heating system is near the end of itsservice life. The system is not capable of providing Ohio Building Code fresh air requirements. The facility does contain a shop area with a dustcollection system. The existing dust collection system is in adequate condition.
Rating: 1 Satisfactory
Recommendations: Provide an air conditioning system throughout the overall facility to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. Funding included in Item A -Heating System.
Item CostUnitWhole Building(01) 1961 Original Construction (1961)110,862 ft²
(02) 1961 Auditorium (1961)7,764 ft²
(03) 1972 Addition (Media Center) (1972)5,692 ft²
SumComments
Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Rooftop packaged chiller unit Packaged wall mounted air condintioning unit
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 13
Facility Assessment
D. Electrical Systems
Description: The electrical system for the overall facility consists of a 208v, 1400-amp, 3-phase, wire system fair condition. The system was installed with theoriginal construction in 1961. The transformer is owned by the utility company and is located in the building in a transformer vault. The panelsystem is in poor condition. The panel system was installed in 1961 and cannot be expanded for additional capacity. Classrooms are equippedwith adequate electrical outlets as several upgrades have provided additional surface mounted electrical receptacles. Corridors of the building areequipped with adequate electrical outlets for building maintenance. The exterior of the building is not equipped with adequate electrical outlets forbuilding maintenance. The facility does not contain lightning protection with grounding. April 2019 Update: The individual line items forTransformer Removal, New Pad Mounted Transformer, Lightening Protection and Building Grounding are included in the scope and budget forcomplete System Replace and those individual line items should be deleted.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: The entire electrical system requires replacement to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines for classroom capacity, the addition of an airconditioning system and due to age. The emergency generator for life safety systems is included in the entire electrical system replacementfunded in this Item D - Electrical. Remove vault mounted transformer and provide new pad mounted transformer. Provide building lightningprotection and grounding. April 2019 Update: Delete the individual line items for Transformer Removal, New Pad Mounted Transformer,Lightening Protection and Building Grounding.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
(01) 1961 OriginalConstruction (1961)110,862 ft²
(02) 1961Auditorium (1961)7,764 ft²
(03) 1972 Addition(Media Center) (1972)5,692 ft²
Sum Comments
System Replacement:
$16.23sq.ft. (ofentire building addition)
Required Required Required $2,017,681.14(Includes demo of existing system. Includes generatorfor life safety systems. Does not include telephone ordata or equipment) (Use items below ONLY when theentire system is NOT being replaced)
Sum: $2,017,681.14$1,799,290.26 $126,009.72 $92,381.16
Main distribution panel Additional classroom receptacles
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 14
Facility Assessment
E. Plumbing and Fixtures
Description: A back flow preventer is not provided. The facility does not contain a water treatment system. Domestic supply piping is copper in adequatecondition. Sanitary waste piping is cast-iron in adequate condition. The domestic water heater is a natural gas unit with separate storage tank andis in fair condition. The school contains 4 large group restrooms for boys, 4 large group restrooms for girls, 2 locker room restrooms for boys, 1locker room restroom for girls, and 2 restrooms for staff. Condition of fixtures is good. The facility is equipped with 6 non-ADA drinking fountains,as well as 4 ADA electric water coolers, in good condition. Special education classroom is not equipped with the required restroom facilities.Kitchen is equipped with the required restroom facilities and fixtures are in good condition. Health clinic is equipped with the required restroomfacilities, and fixtures are in good condition. Due to existing grade configuration, there are no kindergarten / pre-K classrooms. Kitchen fixturesconsist of 1 single, 1 double, and 1 3-well sinks, as well as 1 lavatory, 1 dishwasher, and 1 garbage disposal unit, which are in good condition.The school meets the OBC requirements for fixtures except for lavatories and electric water coolers. ADA requirements are not met for fixturesand drinking fountains (see Item O). Custodial closets are properly located and are adequately provided with required service sink which is ingood condition. Science classrooms / project laboratories are not equipped with required compressed air connection but are equipped withrequired utility sink, gas / connections, and safety shower / eyewash station in good condition. Adequate exterior hose bibbs are provided. April2019 Update: Due to age and condition the sanitary waste piping warrants replacement in the 1961 Original Building.
Rating: 2 Needs Repair
Recommendations: Provide back flow preventer at water service entry. To facilitate the school’s compliance with OBC and OSDM guidelines provide new lavatories,new electric water coolers, and new compressed air connections. Due to condition and OSFC standards, replace faucets and valves. See Item Ofor replacement of fixtures related to ADA requirements. No work required in the 1961 auditorium and 1972 addition. April 2019 Update: Providefor replacing the sanitary piping in the 1961 Original Building.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
(01) 1961 OriginalConstruction (1961)110,862 ft²
(02) 1961Auditorium (1961)7,764 ft²
(03) 1972 Addition(Media Center) (1972)5,692 ft²
Sum Comments
Back Flow Preventer: $5,000.00unit 1 Required $5,000.00
Sanitary Waste Piping: $3.50sq.ft. (of entirebuilding addition)
Required $388,017.00(remove / replace)
Sink: $2,500.00unit 33 Required $82,500.00(new)
Electric water cooler: $3,000.00unit 6 Required $18,000.00(double ADA)
Replace faucets and flush valves $500.00per unit 23 Required $11,500.00(average cost toremove/replace)
HIGH BAY/INDUSTRIAL SPACE - LABTYPES 5,6,7 - Compressed Air Connections
$15,000.00per system 1 Required $15,000.00
Sum: $520,017.00 $520,017.00 $0.00 $0.00
Typical fixture condition Typical fixture condition
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 15
Facility Assessment
F. Windows
Description: The overall facility is equipped with aluminum frame windows with a single glazed type window system, which was installed in 1961, and is inpoor condition. Window system seals are in fair to poor condition, with moderate air and water infiltration being experienced. Window systemhardware is in fair condition. The window system features surface mounted blinds, which are in fair condition. The window system is not equippedwith insect screens on operable windows. Aluminum frame curtain wall systems are found in the original construction, in fair condition. This facilitydoes not feature any glass block windows. A few windows have been replaced with insulated window panels, but are installed on non-thermallybroken aluminum frames. The exterior doors in the overall facility are equipped with hollow metal framed sidelights and transoms with a singleglazed window system, in fair to poor condition. The school does contain 42 acrylic bubble type skylights in fair to poor condition. Window securitygrilles are not provided for ground floor windows. There is not a greenhouse associated with this school.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Provide a new insulated window system with integral blinds to meet with Ohio School Design Manual requirements. Replace curtain wall systems,transoms, and sidelights in the original construction with insulated window systems. Replace skylights in the original construction due to age andcondition. No work is required in the 1961 auditorium and 1972 media center addition, as no windows exist in these areas.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
(01) 1961 Original Construction (1961)110,862 ft²
(02) 1961 Auditorium (1961)7,764 ft²
(03) 1972 Addition (MediaCenter) (1972)5,692 ft²
Sum Comments
Insulated Glass/Panels: $70.00sq.ft. (Qty)
5,122 Required $358,540.00(includes blinds)
Skylights: $125.00sq.ft. (Qty)
672 Required $84,000.00(remove andreplace)
Translucent Panels: $125.00sq.ft. (Qty)
480 Required $60,000.00(remove andreplace)
Curtain Wall/Storefront System:
$80.00sq.ft. (Qty)
6,010 Required $480,800.00(remove andreplace)
Sum: $983,340.00 $983,340.00 $0.00 $0.00
Curtain wall window system Typical non-insulated windows
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 16
Facility Assessment
G. Structure: Foundation
Description: Although no exposed foundation wall was available at time of assessment, exterior walls displayed no signs of significant differential foundationsettlement, cracking, or leaking, indicating that foundations are in good condition. The district reports that there has been no past leaking. Nograding or site drainage deficiencies were noted around the perimeter of the structure that are contributing or could contribute to foundation / wallstructural deterioration. April 2019 Update: Signs of building settlement/movement in several areas of the 1961 Original Building that need to beinvestigated by a Structural Engineer.
Rating: 1 Satisfactory
Recommendations: No work required. April 2019 Update: District engage in the services of a Structural Engineer to provide a report on the buildingsettlement/movement observed.
Item CostUnitWhole Building(01) 1961 Original Construction (1961)110,862 ft²
(02) 1961 Auditorium (1961)7,764 ft²
(03) 1972 Addition (Media Center) (1972)5,692 ft²
SumComments
Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 17
Facility Assessment
H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys
Description: The overall facility has a combination of a brick veneer on a masonry load bearing wall system and a steel framed system, which displayed nolocations of significant deterioration, and is in good condition. The exterior masonry appears to have inappropriately spaced but adequatelycaulked control joints in good condition. Control joints are not provided at lintel locations at doors and windows. The school has sufficientexpansion joints, and they are in good condition. The exterior masonry has not been cleaned and sealed in recent years, and show minorevidence of mortar deterioration. Interior walls are concrete masonry unit, glazed block and metal stud framed partitions with gypsum board, andare in good condition. Interior masonry appears to have adequately spaced and caulked control joints in good condition. Soffits are in goodcondition. Window sills are a combination of stone and an element of the aluminum window system, and are in good condition. Exterior lintels aresteel, and are in good condition. Chimneys are in good condition. Canopies over entrances are steel framed with metal deck type construction,and are in good condition. April 2019 Update: The tuckpointing sf quantities for the 1961 Original Building is inadequate and should be increased.Installation of the new HVAC system will require removal of the cabinet unit heaters and masonry infill will be required at the outside air grilles.Movement and significant masonry cracks observed on the east elevation.
Rating: 2 Needs Repair
Recommendations: Provide tuckpointing in all areas of mortar deterioration as required throughout the overall facility. Provide exterior masonry cleaning and sealingas required throughout the overall facility. Sawcut and caulk new appropriately spaced control joints in existing exterior masonry throughout theoverall facility. No work required in the 1972 addition. April 2019 Update: Increase tuckpointing sf quantity in the 1961 Original Building from 350sf to 3,839 sf. Provide masonry infill at unit ventilator outside air grilles. Provide budget to repair masonry cracks at east elevation. Recommendedthe district hire a Structural Engineer to investigate the cracking and settlement creating this issue.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
(01) 1961 OriginalConstruction (1961)110,862 ft²
(02) 1961Auditorium (1961)7,764 ft²
(03) 1972 Addition(Media Center) (1972)5,692 ft²
Sum Comments
Tuckpointing: $7.50sq.ft. (Qty)
3,839 Required $28,792.50(wall surface)
Exterior Masonry Cleaning:
$1.50sq.ft. (Qty)
38,394 Required 8,640 Required $70,551.00(wall surface)
Exterior Masonry Sealing:
$1.00sq.ft. (Qty)
38,394 Required 8,640 Required $47,034.00(wall surface)
Install Control Joints
$60.00ln.ft. 296 Required $17,760.00
Other: Masonry Repairs
$50,000.00allowance Required $50,000.00Masonry Repairs
Other: StructuralEngineer
$10,000.00allowance Required $10,000.00Structural Engineer Analysis
Other: UnitVentilator Infill
$49.00sq.ft. (Qty)
150 Required $7,350.00Unit Ventilator Infill to include CMU back-up,insulation, vapor barrier and face brick.
Sum: $231,487.50 $209,887.50 $21,600.00 $0.00
Typical exterior wall condition Typical stone sill
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 18
Facility Assessment
I. Structure: Floors and Roofs
Description: The floor construction of the base floor of the overall facility is concrete slab-on-grade type construction, and is in good condition. There is nocrawl space. The floor construction of the intermediate floors of the 1961 original construction is metal deck steel joist type construction and is ingood condition. Ceiling to structural deck spaces are sufficient to accommodate HVAC, electrical, and plumbing scopes of work in requiredrenovations. The roof construction of the overall facility is metal deck on steel joist type construction, and is in good condition.
Rating: 1 Satisfactory
Recommendations: No work required.
Item CostUnitWhole Building(01) 1961 Original Construction (1961)110,862 ft²
(02) 1961 Auditorium (1961)7,764 ft²
(03) 1972 Addition (Media Center) (1972)5,692 ft²
SumComments
Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Typical metal deck roof structure Typical metal deck roof structure
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 19
Facility Assessment
J. General Finishes
Description: The overall facility features conventionally partitioned classrooms with VAT flooring, acoustical tile ceilings, and glazed block and plaster type wallfinishes, which are in fair to poor condition. Corridors have terrazzo flooring, lay-in ceilings, and glazed block and plaster type wall finishes, whichare in fair condition. Restrooms have terrazzo flooring, acoustical tile ceilings, and glazed block wall finishes, which are in fair to poor condition.Toilet partitions are marble type construction with metal doors, and are in poor condition. Classroom casework consists of miscellaneous woodand metal shelving units, is inadequately provided, and in poor condition. Classrooms are provided with adequate chalkboards, markerboards,and tackboards, which are in fair condition. The lockers, located in the corridor, are adequately provided, and in fair condition. The facility isequipped with wood non-louvered interior doors that are partially recessed without proper ADA clearances, and are provided with a combinationof ADA compliant and non-compliant hardware. The gymnasium space has wood flooring, exposed bar joist and metal deck type ceiling, andpainted block and glazed block type wall finishes, which are in fair condition. Gymnasium telescoping stands are wood type construction in fair topoor condition. Gymnasium basketball backboards are manually operated, and are in good condition. The media center, located in the 1972addition, has VAT flooring, lay-in ceilings, and plaster type wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. Student dining, located in the originalconstruction, has terrazzo flooring, lay-in and acoustical tile ceilings, and plaster and brick type wall finishes, which are in fair to poor condition.The existing kitchen is full service, is undersized based on the current enrollment, and the existing equipment has an unknown installation date,and is in poor condition. A walk-in cooler and freezer are located within the kitchen space, and are in fair to poor condition. April 2019 Update:Additional wall insulation required at 1961 Original Building and 1961 Auditorium Addition to meet LEED Silver Certifications Energy EfficiencyRequirements. The fixed seating in the 1961 Auditorium and carpeting are old and worn and warrant replacement. Plaster ceiling patch requiresto facilitate installation of fire protection system. The stage curtain at the 1961 Auditorium requires fire treatment. Sound system and new lightingrequired in 1961 Auditorium.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of finishes and casework due to installation of systems outlined in Items A, C, D, E, K, L, M, N, T, U, and due tocondition. Provide plaster refinishing due to condition and work outlined in Items A, C, D, E, K, L, M, N, T, and U. Funding for replacement ofinterior doors is provided in Item O, including doors here noted as being in poor condition. Provide for repairs to terrazzo flooring due to condition.Provide for removal and replacement of wood flooring in the gymnasium due to age and condition. Provide for replacement of bleachers in thegymnasium due to age and condition. Provide for replacement of toilet partitions due to work outlined in Item O, and due to condition. Provide forreplacement of toilet accessories due to age and condition. Provide for replacement of kitchen equipment due to age and condition of equipment.April 2019 Update: Provide for additional wall insulation at at 1961 Original Building and 1961 Auditorium Addition. Provide for carpet replacementand replacement of new seats in 1961 Auditorium. Replace sound system and lighting in 1961 Fixed Seat Auditorium. Provide for plaster ceilingpatch following installation of fire protection system. Provide for fire treatment/fire dipping of stage curtain at the 1961 Auditorium.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
(01) 1961 OriginalConstruction (1961)110,862 ft²
(02) 1961Auditorium (1961)7,764 ft²
(03) 1972 Addition(Media Center) (1972)5,692 ft²
Sum Comments
Paint: $2.00sq.ft. (of entirebuilding addition)
Required $15,528.00(partial finish - floor area/prep and installation)
Carpet: $4.00sq.ft. (Qty) 2,900 Required $11,600.00(partial finish - tear-out and replace per area)
CompleteReplacement ofFinishes andCasework (High):
$19.33sq.ft. (of entirebuilding addition)
Required Required $2,252,988.82(high school, per building area, with removalof existing)
Toilet Accessory Replacement
$0.20sq.ft. (of entirebuilding addition)
Required $22,172.40(per building area)
Plaster refinishing: $14.00sq.ft. (Qty) 5,543 Required $77,602.00
Terrazzo Floor Repair $25.00sq.ft. (Qty) 300 Required $7,500.00(floor area affected; max. area to be 300 sf)
Bleacher Replacement $110.00per seat 721 Required $79,310.00(based on current enrollment)
Additional Wall Insulation
$6.00sq.ft. (Qty) 38,394 Required 8,640 Required $282,204.00(includes the furring out of the existing walls,insulation and abuse resistant GWB)
Total KitchenEquipment Replacement:
$190.00sq.ft. (Qty) 2,043 Required $388,170.00(square footage based upon only existingarea of food preparation, serving, kitchenstorage areas and walk-ins. Includesdemolition and removal of existing kitchenequipment)
Other: Auditorium Seating
$325.00per unit 866 Required $281,450.00Replace fixed seat auditorium
Other: Lighting $125,000.00allowance Required $125,000.00Auditorium Lighting
Other: Plaster Repair $8,000.00allowance Required $8,000.00Plaster Repair following fire protectioninstallation
Other: Sound System $100,000.00allowance Required $100,000.00New Sound System
Other: Wood Floor Replacement
$30.00sq.ft. (Qty) 10,199 Required $305,970.00Provide for removal and replacement of woodflooring in the gymnasium due to age andcondition.
Sum: $3,957,495.22$3,254,050.86 $593,418.00 $110,026.36
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 20
Typical corridor finishes Typical classroom finishes
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 21
Facility Assessment
K. Interior Lighting
Description: The typical classrooms in the overall facility are equipped with 1x4 surface mount fluorescent fixtures with dual level switching. Classroom fixturesare in fair condition, providing an average illumination of 65 FC, thus complying with the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The typical corridorsin the overall facility are equipped with single tube surface mount fluorescent fixtures with dual level switching. Corridor fixtures are in fair to poorcondition, providing an average illumination of 27 FC, thus complying with the 20 FC recommended by the OSDM. The gymnasium space isequipped with pendant mercury vapor type lighting, in fair condition, providing an average illumination of 85 FC, thus complying with the 60 FCrecommended by the OSDM. The media center is equipped with 1x4 lay-in fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition, providing an averageillumination of 48 FC, which is less than the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The student dining space is equipped with 1x4 lay-in fluorescentfixture type lighting with multi level switching. Student dining fixtures are in fair condition, providing an average illumination of 42 FC, which is lessthan the 50 FC recommended by the OSDM. The kitchen spaces are equipped with 1x4 surface mount fluorescent fixture type lighting with multilevel switching. Kitchen fixtures are in fair condition, providing an average illumination of 60 FC, which is less than the 75-80 FC recommended bythe OSDM. The service areas in the overall facility are equipped with 1x4 surface mount fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition. Thetypical administrative spaces in the overall facility are equipped with 1x4 surface mount fluorescent fixture type lighting in fair condition, providingadequate illumination based on OSDM requirements. The overall lighting systems of the facility are not fully compliant with Ohio School DesignManual requirements due to age and condition, and inadequate lighting levels.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of lighting system due to condition, lighting levels, and installation of systems outlined in Items A, C, D, J, L, M, N,and U.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
(01) 1961 OriginalConstruction (1961)110,862 ft²
(02) 1961Auditorium (1961)7,764 ft²
(03) 1972 Addition (MediaCenter) (1972)5,692 ft²
Sum Comments
Complete Building Lighting Replacement
$6.50sq.ft. (of entirebuilding addition)
Required Required Required $808,067.00Includes demo ofexisting fixtures
Sum: $808,067.00 $720,603.00 $50,466.00 $36,998.00
Typical corridor lighting Typical classroom lighting
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 22
Facility Assessment
L. Security Systems
Description: The overall facility contains a security system consisting of security cameras at corridors and entrances and motion sensors. The securitycameras are monitored in the administrative office areas. The existing security system is in fair condition. The exterior security lighting consists ofwall, soffit (at the exterior doors) and pole mounted light fixtures at the drives and parking areas. Exterior security lighting is in fair condition andprovides inadequate coverage. April 2019 Update: Security control point required at main entry to control visitor entry. Complete security systemreplacement required due to above ceiling work. Complete replacement of exterior lighting required.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Provide additional building security systems as desired from the district to more thoroughly protect the building during school hours and afterschool hours. Provide additional exterior security lighting to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. April 2019 Update: Provide budget forsecurity vestibule. Delete partial system replacement and add complete replacement. Delete partial site lighting replacement and add completeexterior lighting replacement
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
(01) 1961 OriginalConstruction (1961)110,862 ft²
(02) 1961 Auditorium (1961)7,764 ft²
(03) 1972 Addition (MediaCenter) (1972)5,692 ft²
Sum Comments
Security System: $2.85sq.ft. (of entire building addition)
Required Required Required $354,306.30(complete, area ofbuilding)
Exterior Site Lighting:
$1.00sq.ft. (of entire building addition)
Required Required Required $124,318.00(complete, area ofbuilding)
Other: Security Vestibule
$200,000.00allowance Required $200,000.00Security Vestibule
Sum: $678,624.30 $626,818.70 $29,891.40 $21,914.20
Corridor mounted security cameras Security camera monitor
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 23
Facility Assessment
M. Emergency/Egress Lighting
Description: The overall facility does contain an emergency/egress lighting system with battery backup within the individual wall mounted units. The system isin fair condition but has areas within the egress path that are not properly illuminated. There are areas within the egress paths that do not haveclear sight to exit signage.
Rating: 2 Needs Repair
Recommendations: Emergency power generator is funded under Item D - Electrical. Provide additional exit signage as required to satisfy local fire and buildingofficials as well as Ohio Building Code. Provide exit signage on separate electrical circuits. Supplement battery backup wall mounted emergencylighting fixtures to increase lighting levels in corridors and egress paths to at least 1.5 foot candles in all areas.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
(01) 1961 Original Construction (1961)110,862 ft²
(02) 1961 Auditorium (1961)7,764 ft²
(03) 1972 Addition (Media Center) (1972)5,692 ft²
Sum Comments
Component: New Exit Sign $300.00each 9 Required 4 Required 12 Required $7,500.00
Component: New Emergency Light
$350.00each 9 Required 4 Required 2 Required $5,250.00
Sum: $12,750.00 $5,850.00 $2,600.00 $4,300.00
Ceiling mounted exit signage Emergency lighting fixture
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 24
Facility Assessment
N. Fire Alarm
Description: The overall facility contains a fire alarm system in fair condition. Manual pull stations are mounted in corridors and assembly areas. Manual pullstations are mounted at exits. Horns and strobes are neither mounted in classrooms nor visible in all corridors. Mechanical equipment does notcontain automatic fire alarm devices. The system does not have additional zone capabilities. The system is not adequately provided throughoutthe facility. The fire alarm system does not meet NFPA requirements and Ohio School Design Manual guidelines.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of fire alarm system consisting of manual fire alarm pull stations mounted at required heights, remote annunciatorpanels, automatic fire detection devices in all air devices and mechanical equipment, and horn/strobe devices located in all occupied spaces tomeet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
(01) 1961 OriginalConstruction (1961)110,862 ft²
(02) 1961Auditorium (1961)7,764 ft²
(03) 1972 Addition (MediaCenter) (1972)5,692 ft²
Sum Comments
Fire Alarm System:
$2.25sq.ft. (of entirebuilding addition)
Required Required Required $279,715.50(complete new system, includingremoval of existing)
Sum: $279,715.50 $249,439.50 $17,469.00 $12,807.00
Corridor mounted horn/strobe device Fire alarm pull station
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 25
Facility Assessment
O. Handicapped Access
Description: At the site, there is an accessible route provided from the public right-of-way, the accessible parking areas, and from the passenger unloadingzone to the main entrance of the school. There is an accessible route connecting all or most areas of the site. Access from the parking / drop-offarea to the building entries is not compromised by steps or steep ramps. Adequate handicap parking is not provided. Exterior doors are equippedwith ADA hardware. The main entry is not equipped with an ADA power assist door. No playground issues were considered due to existing gradeconfiguration. On the interior of the building, space allowances and reach ranges are mostly compliant. There is an accessible route through thebuilding which does include protruding objects. Ground and floor surfaces are compliant. Ramps and stairs do not meet all ADA requirements,and are insufficient due to railing configurations. This multistory building has a compliant elevator that accesses every floor . Stage is leveled withmain corridors. Interior doors are recessed, are mostly provided adequate clearances, and are mostly provided with ADA-compliant hardware. 19ADA-compliant toilets are required, and 1 is currently provided. 19 ADA-compliant lavatories are required, and 1 is currently provided. 9ADA-compliant urinals are required, and 0 are currently provided. 5 ADA-compliant showers are required, and 0 are currently provided. 16ADA-compliant electric water coolers are required, and 6 are currently provided. Toilet partitions are marble, wood, and metal, and do not provideappropriate ADA clearances. ADA-compliant accessories are not adequately provided and mounted. Mirrors do not meet ADA requirements formounting heights. Health clinic restroom is not compliant with ADA requirements. ADA signage is not provided on the interior and the exterior ofthe building. April 2019 Update: The interior doors are old, worn and have air transfer louvers that will nor be compatible with the new HVACsystem and will not meet current building code. The shower rooms have a concrete curb that to not allow ADA access to the showers.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Provide new ADA-compliant signage, power assist door opener, electric water coolers, toilets, lavatories, urinals, showers, toilet partitions, andmirrors, as well as replace showers, and rework narrow door openings to facilitate the school’s meeting of ADA requirements. Parking issues arecorrected in Item P. Exterior door hardware issues are corrected in Item S. Stair railing issues are addressed under Item U. Toilet accessories areaddressed under Item J. April 2019 Update: Replace all the interior doors. Rework shower room curb and floor drains to provide for ADA accessto showers.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
(01) 1961 OriginalConstruction (1961)110,862 ft²
(02) 1961Auditorium (1961)7,764 ft²
(03) 1972 Addition(Media Center) (1972)5,692 ft²
Sum Comments
Signage: $0.20sq.ft. (of entirebuilding addition)
Required Required Required $24,863.60(per building area)
Electric Water Coolers: $3,000.00unit 10 Required $30,000.00(new double ADA)
Toilet/Urinals/Sinks: $3,800.00unit 45 Required $171,000.00(new ADA)
Toilet Partitions: $1,000.00stall 10 Required $10,000.00(ADA - grab bars, accessories included)
ADA Assist Door & Frame:
$7,500.00unit 1 Required $7,500.00(openers, electrical, patching, etc)
Replace Doors: $1,300.00leaf 138 Required 6 Required 7 Required $196,300.00(standard 3070 wood door, HM frame,door/light, includes hardware)
Other: ADA Mirrors $350.00per unit 18 Required $6,300.00New ADA compliant mirror.
Other: ADA Shower $6,800.00per unit 2 Required $13,600.00ADA Shower w/o partitions - demoexisting fixture, provide ADA accessoriesand restore finishes
Other: ADA Shower $1,950.00per unit 3 Required $5,850.00ADA shower replacement.
Other: Rework Shower Curbs
$20,000.00allowance Required $20,000.00Rework Shower Curbs and Floor Drains
Sum: $485,413.60 $465,822.40 $9,352.80 $10,238.40
Typical signage Typical electric water cooler
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 26
Facility Assessment
P. Site Condition
Description: The 49 acre relatively flat site is located in a rural residential and agricultural setting with moderate tree and shrub type landscaping. The site isshared with the district bus maintenance facility. There are no apparent problems with erosion or ponding. The site is bordered by moderatelytraveled county roads. Multiple entrances onto the site provide proper separation of bus and other vehicular traffic, and one-way bus traffic isprovided. There is a curbside bus loading and unloading zone in front of the school, which is separated from other vehicular traffic. Staff, visitor,and student parking is facilitated by multiple asphalt parking lots in fair to poor condition, containing 305 parking places, which provides adequateparking for staff members, visitors, and students. Parking for the disabled is not adequately provided. The site and parking lot drainage design,consisting of sheet drainage, swales, catch basins, and storm sewers provides adequate evacuation of storm water, and no problems withparking lot ponding were observed. Concrete curbs in poor condition are not located as required. Trash pick-up and service drive pavement isheavy duty, and is not equipped with a concrete pad area for dumpsters. Concrete sidewalks are properly sloped, are located to provide a logicalflow of pedestrian traffic, and are in fair to poor condition. The athletic facilities are comprised of multipurpose fields, football field and trackfacility, baseball field, and softball field, and are in fair condition. Site features are suitable for outdoor instruction, though no related equipmenthas been provided to facilitate doing so. April 2019 Update: Large swales and ditches run through the site creating extensive site erosion.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Provide for replacement of asphalt pavement in poor condition. Provide for replacement of concrete sidewalks in poor condition. Provide forreplacement of concrete curbs and additional curbs to delineate vehicular traffic patterns, and to meet OSDM guidelines. Provide heavy dutyconcrete pavement at the dumpster pad. Provide site contingency allowances for unforeseen conditions. April 2019 Update: Provide for soilstabilization.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
(01) 1961 OriginalConstruction (1961)110,862 ft²
(02) 1961Auditorium (1961)7,764 ft²
(03) 1972 Addition(Media Center) (1972)5,692 ft²
Sum Comments
Replace Existing Asphalt Paving(heavy duty):
$30.60sq. yard 20,250 Required 972 Required $649,393.20(including drainage / tear out forheavy duty asphalt)
Concrete Curb: $20.00ln.ft. 4,914 Required 236 Required $103,000.00(new)
Concrete Sidewalk: $5.00sq.ft. (Qty)
15,267 Required 733 Required $80,000.00(5 inch exterior slab)
Base Sitework Allowance forUnforeseen Circumstances
$50,000.00allowance Required $50,000.00Include this and one of the next two.(Applies for whole building, so only one addition should have this item)
Sitework Allowance forUnforeseen Circumstances forbuildings 100,000 SF or larger
$150,000.00allowance Required $150,000.00Include this one or the previous.(Applies for whole building, so only one addition should have this item)
Other: Heavy Duty Concrete Pavement
$12.00sq.ft. (Qty)
573 Required 27 Required $7,200.00Provide heavy duty concretepavement at dumpster pad.
Other: Soil Stabilization $2.50sq.ft. (Qty)
6,000 Required $15,000.00Soil Stabilization
Sum: $1,054,593.20$1,016,141.00 $0.00 $38,452.20
Concrete sidewalk in poor condition Concrete sidewalk in poor condition
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 28
Facility Assessment
Q. Sewage System
Description: District reports no problems with the sanitary sewage main. Building is served by an on-site sanitary sewage treatment plant. The system isapproximately 25+ years old. The system is in poor condition. District reports several problems with the system.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Remove and replace on-site sewage treatment system based upon current student enrollment of building at funding levels indicated below.Remove and replace on-site sanitary sewer main.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
(01) 1961 OriginalConstruction (1961)110,862 ft²
(02) 1961 Auditorium (1961)7,764 ft²
(03) 1972 Addition (MediaCenter) (1972)5,692 ft²
Sum Comments
On-Site SewageTreatment System:
$225.00per student
721 Required $162,225.00(per student atmiddle/high)
Sewage Main: $45.00ln.ft. 125 Required $5,625.00(include excavation andbackfilling)
Sum: $167,850.00 $167,850.00 $0.00 $0.00
Waste water treatment plant
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 29
Facility Assessment
R. Water Supply
Description: Building water supply is provided from a municipal water supply. Water service main piping is non-galvanized. Domestic supply piping isnon-galvanized. The water supply does not contain a back flow preventer. The existing service does have adequate capacity and pressure for thecurrent needs of the school’s domestic water supply. The existing service does not have adequate capacity and pressure for the needs of theschool’s future fire suppression system. District did not indicate domestic water service pressure problems.
Rating: 2 Needs Repair
Recommendations: Increase water service size for fire protection which is included in the cost of the fire suppression system installation funded under Item U - LifeSafety. Install back flow preventer to meet OBC requirements. Back flow preventer funded under Item E - Plumbing and Fixtures. Replacedomestic water main. Provide funding for water quality testing.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
(01) 1961 Original Construction (1961)110,862 ft²
(02) 1961 Auditorium (1961)7,764 ft²
(03) 1972 Addition (Media Center) (1972)5,692 ft²
Sum Comments
Domestic Water Main
$50.00ln.ft. 125 Required $6,250.00(new)
Water Quality Test $500.00allowance Required $500.00(includes 2tests)
Sum: $6,750.00 $6,750.00 $0.00 $0.00
Water service entry
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 30
Facility Assessment
S. Exterior Doors
Description: Typical exterior doors in the overall facility are hollow metal type construction, installed on hollow metal frames, and in fair to poor condition.Typical exterior doors feature no vision panels. Entrance doors in the overall facility are aluminum type construction, installed on aluminumframes, and in fair to poor condition. Entrance doors feature single glazed wired glass and tempered glass vision panels. Overhead doors arewood and metal type in fair to poor condition. April 2019 Update: There are 4 overhead doors that need to be replaced.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Replace all exterior doors to comply with Ohio Building Code, ADA, and Ohio School Design Manual guidelines, and due to condition.Replacement of single glazed door vision panels, transoms, and sidelights is addressed in Item F. No work is required in the 1961 auditorium and1972 media center addition, as no exterior doors are located in these areas. April 2019 Update: Increase overhead door replacement from 3 to 4.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
(01) 1961 OriginalConstruction (1961)110,862 ft²
(02) 1961 Auditorium (1961)7,764 ft²
(03) 1972 Addition (MediaCenter) (1972)5,692 ft²
Sum Comments
Door Leaf/Frame and Hardware:
$2,500.00per leaf
25 Required $62,500.00(includes removal ofexisting)
Overhead doors and hardware:
$3,500.00per leaf
4 Required $14,000.00(8 x 10 sectional, manualoperation)
Sum: $76,500.00 $76,500.00 $0.00 $0.00
Overhead door Exterior door
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 31
Facility Assessment
T. Hazardous Material
Description: The district provided the assessment team with their three-year reinspection report compiled in March 2007 by Monit-Air Group, Inc. The reportindicates that hazardous material is present within the building. According to school district personnel, the site does not contain underground fueltanks.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Remove all hazardous material indicated on the Environmental Hazards Assessment Form attached within this report.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
(01) 1961 OriginalConstruction (1961)110,862 ft²
(02) 1961Auditorium (1961)7,764 ft²
(03) 1972 Addition(Media Center) (1972)5,692 ft²
Sum Comments
Environmental Hazards Form EEHA Form EEHA Form EEHA Form —
Tank Insulation Removal $8.00sq.ft. (Qty)
200 Required 0 Required 0 Required $1,600.00
Duct Insulation Removal $8.00sq.ft. (Qty)
240 Required 0 Required 0 Required $1,920.00
Estimated Cost For AbatementContractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups
$1.00per unit
5,000 Required 0 Required 0 Required $5,000.00
Special Engineering Fees for LBP Mock-Ups
$1.00per unit
5,000 Required 0 Required 0 Required $5,000.00
Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration
$0.10sq.ft. (Qty)
110,862 Required 7,764 Required5,692 Required $12,431.80
Pipe Insulation Removal $10.00ln.ft. 800 Required 0 Required 0 Required $8,000.00
Pipe Insulation Removal (Hidden in Walls/Ceilings)
$15.00ln.ft. 2,220 Required 1,885 Required115 Required $63,300.00
Dismantling of Boiler/Furnace/Incinerator
$2,000.00each 1 Required 0 Required 0 Required $2,000.00
Flexible Duct Connection Removal $100.00each 12 Required 0 Required 0 Required $1,200.00
Acoustical Plaster Removal $7.00sq.ft. (Qty)
7,000 Required 0 Required 0 Required $49,000.00See J
Laboratory Table/Counter Top Removal
$100.00each 70 Required 0 Required 0 Required $7,000.00See J
Cement Board Removal $5.00sq.ft. (Qty)
1,050 Required 0 Required 0 Required $5,250.00
Electric Cord Insulation Removal $1.00ln.ft. 0 Required 100 Required 0 Required $100.00
Light (Reflector) Fixture Removal $50.00each 2 Required 0 Required 0 Required $100.00See K
Door and Window Panel Removal $100.00each 33 Required 0 Required 0 Required $3,300.00See J & F
Non-ACM Ceiling/Wall Removal (for access)
$2.00sq.ft. (Qty)
8,880 Required 7,540 Required460 Required $33,760.00See J
Window Component (Compound,Tape, or Caulk) - Reno & Demo
$300.00each 140 Required 0 Required 0 Required $42,000.00
Window Component (Compound,Tape, or Caulk) - Reno Only
$300.00each 140 Required 0 Required 0 Required $42,000.00
Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic
$3.00sq.ft. (Qty)
40,000 Required 0 Required 5,692 Required $137,076.00See J
Carpet Removal (over RFC) $1.00sq.ft. (Qty)
2,000 Required 0 Required 0 Required $2,000.00See J
Other: EHA ACM Other $1.00per unit
16,500 Required $16,500.00Chalkboard Mastic
Other: EHA ACM Other $1.00per unit
20,000 Required
$20,000.00Fire Curtain
Other: EHA Other Hazard $1.00per unit
10,000 Required $10,000.00ACM duct insulation observed in wood shopaove ceiling in wood shop hallway. May bepresent in other inaccessible areas/aboveceilings
Sum: $468,537.80 $384,016.20 $64,231.40 $20,290.20
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 32
VAT in classrooms Asbestos label in boiler room
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 33
Facility Assessment
U. Life Safety
Description: Building contains four (4) corridor security grilles which when in the closed position create dead-end corridor conditions. The overall facility doesnot contain an automatic fire suppression system. The stairwells are not enclosed and the handrails do not meet requirements. The existing watermain will not provide adequate pressure and volume of water for future fire suppression system. There are an adequate number of fireextinguishers. Mounting heights of existing fire extinguishers do not meet ADA requirements. The kitchen hood is equipped with a firesuppression system. April 2019 Update: Budget for fire extinguisher cabinets is inadequate. Backflow Preventer required for new dedicated waterline.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Provide for removal of corridor security grilles to eliminate dead-end corridor conditions when they are in the closed position. Provide anautomatic fire suppression system to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. Provide interior stairwell enclosures to meet Ohio SchoolDesign Manual guidelines. Provide new handrails at interior stairways to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines. Provide new water mainand tap to provide adequate pressure and volume of water for fire suppression system. Emergency generator is included in total electrical systemreplacement funded under Item D - Electrical. Provide fire extinguishers and cabinets adequately spaced and mounted at required ADA mountingheights. New kitchen hood with fire suppression is included in complete kitchen equipment replacement funded under Item J - General Finishes.April 2019 Update: Increase fire cabinet cost/unit from $0.12 to $0.50. Provide for backflow preventer.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
(01) 1961 OriginalConstruction (1961)110,862 ft²
(02) 1961Auditorium (1961)7,764 ft²
(03) 1972 Addition(Media Center) (1972)5,692 ft²
Sum Comments
Sprinkler / FireSuppression System:
$3.20sq.ft. (Qty) 110,862 Required 7,764 Required 5,692 Required $397,817.60(includes increase of service piping, if required)
Interior Stairwell Closure:
$5,000.00per level 6 Required $30,000.00(includes associated doors, door frames andhardware)
Water Main $50.00ln.ft. 125 Required $6,250.00(new)
Handrails: $5,000.00level 6 Required $30,000.00
Other: Backflow Preventer
$5,000.00allowance Required $5,000.00Bacflow Preventer for new dedicated water line
Other: Fireextinguishers and cabinets
$0.50sq.ft. (of entirebuilding addition)
Required Required Required $62,159.00Provide fire extinguishers and cabinetsadequately spaced and mounted at requiredADA mounting heights.
Other: Removecorridor security gates
$1,500.00each 4 Required $6,000.00Provide for removal of corridor security grillesto eliminate dead-end corridor conditions whenthey are in the closed position.
Sum: $537,226.60 $487,439.40 $28,726.80 $21,060.40
Non-enclosed stair with non-compliant handrails Corridor security gate
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 34
Facility Assessment
V. Loose Furnishings
Description: The typical classroom furniture is mismatched, and in generally fair to poor condition, consisting of miscellaneous student desks & chairs,miscellaneous teacher desks & chairs, miscellaneous file cabinets, reading table, computer workstation, miscellaneous bookcases, andwastebaskets. The facility’s furniture and loose equipment were evaluated in item 6.17 in the CEFPI section of this report, and on a scale of 1 to10 the overall facility received a rating of 5 due to observed conditions, and due to the fact that it lacks some of the Ohio School Design Manualrequired elements. April 2019 Update: The loose furnishings budget should be increased.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate furniture. April 2019 Update: Increase the loos furnishings from $4/sf to $6.50/sf
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
(01) 1961 Original Construction (1961)110,862 ft²
(02) 1961 Auditorium (1961)7,764 ft²
(03) 1972 Addition (Media Center) (1972)5,692 ft²
Sum Comments
CEFPI Rating 0to 3
$6.50sq.ft. (of entire building addition)
Required Required $757,601.00
Sum: $757,601.00 $720,603.00 $0.00 $36,998.00
Student desk and chair in classroom Teacher desk and chair in classroom
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 35
Facility Assessment
W. Technology
Description: The typical classroom is not equipped with four technology data ports for student use as required by the Ohio School Design Manual. Theinstructor or teacher area is equipped with one data port, one voice port and one cable port as required by the Ohio School Design Manual. Thebuilding contains two (2) stand alone computer labs. The teaching stations provide through a call switch/button system for two-waycommunication to the administration area.
Rating: 3 Needs Replacement
Recommendations: Provide technology upgrades, wiring and systems per Ohio School Design Manual guidelines.
Item Cost Unit Whole Building
(01) 1961 OriginalConstruction (1961)110,862 ft²
(02) 1961 Auditorium (1961)7,764 ft²
(03) 1972 Addition (MediaCenter) (1972)5,692 ft²
Sum Comments
HS portion of building with total SF100,000 to 133,600
$9.00sq.ft. (Qty)
110,862 Required 7,764 Required 5,692 Required $1,118,862.00
Sum: $1,118,862.00 $997,758.00 $69,876.00 $51,228.00
Business computer lab Security data collection system
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 36
Facility Assessment
X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost
Renovation Costs (A-W) $19,238,293.96
7.00% Construction Contingency $1,346,680.58
Subtotal $20,584,974.54
16.29% Non-Construction Costs $3,353,292.35
Total Project $23,938,266.89
Construction Contingency $1,346,680.58
Non-Construction Costs $3,353,292.35
Total for X. $4,699,972.93
Non-Construction Costs Breakdown
Land Survey 0.03% $6,175.49
Soil Borings / Phase I Envir. Report 0.10% $20,584.97
Agency Approval Fees (Bldg. Code) 0.25% $51,462.44
Construction Testing 0.40% $82,339.90
Printing - Bid Documents 0.15% $30,877.46
Advertising for Bids 0.02% $4,116.99
Builder’s Risk Insurance 0.12% $24,701.97
Design Professional’s Compensation 7.50% $1,543,873.09
CM Compensation 6.00% $1,235,098.47
Commissioning 0.60% $123,509.85
Non-Construction Contingency (includes partnering and mediation services) 1.12% $230,551.71
Total Non-Construction Costs 16.29% $3,353,292.35
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Facility Assessment Page 37
School Facility Appraisal
Name of Appraiser Jeff Tuckerman Date of Appraisal 2008-04-14
Building Name Edgewood High School
Street Address 2428 Blake Rd
City/Town, State, Zip Code Ashtabula, OH 44004
Telephone Number(s) (440) 997-5301
School District Buckeye Local SD
Setting: Rural
Site-Acreage 49.00 Building Square Footage 124,318
Grades Housed 9-12 Student Capacity 744
Number of Teaching Stations 43 Number of Floors 2
Student Enrollment 511
Dates of Construction 1961,1961,1972
Energy Sources: Fuel Oil Gas Electric Solar
Air Conditioning: Roof Top Windows Units Central Room Units
Heating: Central Roof Top Individual Unit Forced Air
Hot Water Steam
Type of Construction
Load bearing masonry
Steel frame
Concrete frame
Wood
Steel Joists
Exterior Surfacing
Brick
Stucco
Metal
Wood
Stone
Floor Construction
Wood Joists
Steel Joists
Slab on grade
Structural slab
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53School Facility Appraisal Page 38
Suitability Appraisal of 1.0 The School Site for Edgewood_High_School_2008_Assessment_April_2019_EEA_02_11_20
Bottom of page
Suitability Appraisal of 1.0 The School Site for Edgewood_High_School_2008_Assessment_April_2019_EEA_02_11_20
1.0 The School Site Points Allocated Points
1.1 Site is large enough to meet educational needs as defined by state and local requirements 25 25
The site is 49 acres compared to 42 acres required by the OSDM.
1.2 Site is easily accessible and conveniently located for the present and future population 20 16
The school is centrally located within the school district, and is easily accessible. The site is accessible from city streets that are suitable for buses, cars, and service
vehicles. Two entry points are provided into the site, with appropriate separation of car and bus traffic.
1.3 Location is removed from undesirable business, industry, traffic, and natural hazards 10 8
The site is adjacent to residential and agricultural uses, and there are no undesirable features adjacent to the school site.
1.4 Site is well landscaped and developed to meet educational needs 10 6
The site is moderately landscaped with mature shade trees, ornamental trees, and shrubs which define the property and emphasize the building entrance. Lawn areas
where mowing is required do not exceed 3:1 slope. The site has not been developed with outdoor learning spaces and athletic fields to enhance the learning environment.
1.5 ES Well equipped playgrounds are separated from streets and parking areasMS Well equipped athletic and intermural areas are separated from streets and parkingHS Well equipped athletic areas are adequate with sufficient solid-surface parking
10 8
Athletic facilities include multi-purpose fields, softball field, baseball field, football field, including a track, and tennis courts, which are provided with proper separation from
vehicular use areas, and are provided with adequate solid surface parking for events.
1.6 Topography is varied enough to provide desirable appearance and without steep inclines 5 4
The site is relatively flat with slopes for positive drainage, and is desirable.
1.7 Site has stable, well drained soil free of erosion 5 4
Soils appear to be stable and well drained, and no erosion was observed.
1.8 Site is suitable for special instructional needs, e.g., outdoor learning 5 2
The site has not been developed to accommodate outdoor learning.
1.9 Pedestrian services include adequate sidewalk with designated crosswalks, curb cuts, and correct slopes 5 3
Sidewalks are adequately provided to accommodate safe pedestrian circulation including designated crosswalks, curb cuts, and correct slopes. Sidewalks are in fair to
poor condition.
1.10 ES/MS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking for faculty and staff is providedHS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking is provided for faculty, students, staff and community
5 3
Adequate parking is provided for faculty, staff, student and community events, and is located on asphalt pavement in fair to poor condition.
TOTAL - 1.0 The School Site 100 79
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Suitability Appraisal of 1.0 The School Site for Edgewood_High_School_2008_Assessment_April_2019_EEA_02_11_20 Page 39
Suitability Appraisal of 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features for Edgewood_High_School_2008_Assessment_April_2019_EEA_02_11_20
Bottom of page
Suitability Appraisal of 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features for Edgewood_High_School_2008_Assessment_April_2019_EEA_02_11_20
2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features Points Allocated Points
Structural
2.1 Structure meets all barrier-free requirements both externally and internally 15 4
Entire building is not ADA-compliant.
2.2 Roofs appear sound, have positive drainage, and are weather tight 15 6
The asphalt built-up roofing system over the 1961 original construction and the 1961 auditorium requires replacement to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines
for age of system and due to condition.
2.3 Foundations are strong and stable with no observable cracks 10 9
Foundations are in good condition with no observable cracks.
2.4 Exterior and interior walls have sufficient expansion joints and are free of deterioration 10 6
Exterior and interior walls are in good to fair condition, have sufficient expansion joints, and are in need of cleaning, sealing and tuckpointing.
2.5 Entrances and exits are located so as to permit efficient student traffic flow 10 8
Exits are properly located to allow safe egress from the building.
2.6 Building ’’envelope’’ generally provides for energy conservation (see criteria) 10 3
Age of construction indicates minimal insulation.
2.7 Structure is free of friable asbestos and toxic materials 10 2
The building is reported to contain asbestos and other hazardous materials.
2.8 Interior walls permit sufficient flexibility for a variety of class sizes 10 6
Interior walls throughout the facility are fixed walls and are not flexible.
Mechanical/Electrical Points Allocated Points
2.9 Adequate light sources are well maintained, and properly placed and are not subject to overheating 15 6
Light sources provide inadequate lighting in some areas. Fixtures are well maintained in most areas. Light fixtures do not appear to be subject to overheating.
2.10 Internal water supply is adequate with sufficient pressure to meet health and safety requirements 15 7
Internal water supply will not support a future fire suppression system, but is adequate for current requirements.
2.11 Each teaching/learning area has adequate convenient wall outlets, phone and computer cabling for technology applications 15 8
Classrooms have an inadequate number of outlets and data jacks for technology applications.
2.12 Electrical controls are safely protected with disconnect switches easily accessible 10 3
Disconnect switches are not adequately provided to allow for safe servicing of equipment.
2.13 Drinking fountains are adequate in number and placement, and are properly maintained including provisions for the disabled 10 4
Drinking fountains are not adequate in number and placement, and do not meet ADA requirements. Drinking fountains are properly maintained.
2.14 Number and size of restrooms meet requirements 10 8
The number and size of restrooms meet OBC requirements.
2.15 Drainage systems are properly maintained and meet requirements 10 8
Drainage systems appear to be properly maintained and meet requirements.
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Suitability Appraisal of 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features for Edgewood_High_School_2008_Assessment_April_2019_EEA_02_11_20 Page 40
2.16 Fire alarms, smoke detectors, and sprinkler systems are properly maintained and meet requirements 10 5
The fire alarm system does not meet requirements. Smoke detectors are minimally provided. The facility is not sprinkled.
2.17 Intercommunication system consists of a central unit that allows dependable two-way communication between the office andinstructional areas
10 6
Two way communication is provided by speakers and call buttons in the classrooms.
2.18 Exterior water supply is sufficient and available for normal usage 5 2
Exterior hose bibs are inadequately provided around the exterior of the facility.
TOTAL - 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 200 101
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Suitability Appraisal of 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features for Edgewood_High_School_2008_Assessment_April_2019_EEA_02_11_20 Page 41
Suitability Appraisal of 3.0 Plant Maintainability for Edgewood_High_School_2008_Assessment_April_2019_EEA_02_11_20
Bottom of page
Suitability Appraisal of 3.0 Plant Maintainability for Edgewood_High_School_2008_Assessment_April_2019_EEA_02_11_20
3.0 Plant Maintainability Points Allocated Points
3.1 Windows, doors, and walls are of material and finish requiring minimum maintenance 15 8
Interior doors are stained wood requiring maintenance. Walls are painted plaster requiring maintenance.
3.2 Floor surfaces throughout the building require minimum care 15 9
Flooring throughout the facility consists of VAT, carpet, and terrazzo. VAT requires special care and maintenance.
3.3 Ceilings and walls throughout the building, including service areas, are easily cleaned and resistant to stain 10 6
Acoustical tile and lay-in ceilings are not easily cleaned or resistant to stain. Glazed block is easily cleaned and resistant to stain.
3.4 Built-in equipment is designed and constructed for ease of maintenance 10 4
Casework consists of miscellaneous wood and metal shelving units in poor condition.
3.5 Finishes and hardware, with compatible keying system, are of durable quality 10 6
Door hardware varies throughout the facility, some meet ADA requirements, while others do not meet ADA requirements.
3.6 Restroom fixtures are wall mounted and of quality finish 10 9
Fixtures are floor and wall mounted and are of good quality.
3.7 Adequate custodial storage space with water and drain is accessible throughout the building 10 9
Custodial storage space is adequately located throughout the facility, including provisions for water and drains.
3.8 Adequate electrical outlets and power, to permit routine cleaning, are available in every area 10 9
Electrical outlets are adequately provided in corridors and allow for convenient routine cleaning.
3.9 Outdoor light fixtures, electrical outlets, equipment, and other fixtures are accessible for repair and replacement 10 8
Outdoor light fixtures are wall and pole mounted requiring lifts and ladders to service. Electrical outlets are inadequately provided around the exterior of the facility.
TOTAL - 3.0 Plant Maintainability 100 68
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Suitability Appraisal of 3.0 Plant Maintainability for Edgewood_High_School_2008_Assessment_April_2019_EEA_02_11_20 Page 42
Suitability Appraisal of 4.0 Building Safety and Security for Edgewood_High_School_2008_Assessment_April_2019_EEA_02_11_20
Bottom of page
Suitability Appraisal of 4.0 Building Safety and Security for Edgewood_High_School_2008_Assessment_April_2019_EEA_02_11_20
4.0 Building Safety and Security Points Allocated Points
Site Safety
4.1 Student loading areas are segregated from other vehicular traffic and pedestrian walkways 15 12
Student loading is separated from vehicular traffic and pedestrian walkways.
4.2 Walkways, both on and offsite, are available for safety of pedestrians 10 8
Walkways are adequately provided on-site for pedestrian safety. No off-site sidewalks are required for this rural school site.
4.3 Access streets have sufficient signals and signs to permit safe entrance to and exit from school area 5 4
School signs and signals are located as required on adjacent access streets.
4.4 Vehicular entrances and exits permit safe traffic flow 5 3
Buses and other vehicular traffic use separate entrance and exit points to the site, allowing for safe vehicular traffic flow.
4.5 ES Playground equipment is free from hazardMS Location and types of intramural equipment are free from hazardHS Athletic field equipment is properly located and is free from hazard
5 4
Athletic fields are adequately equipped and appear to be free from hazard.
Building Safety Points Allocated Points
4.6 The heating unit(s) is located away from student occupied areas 20 15
Heating boilers are located in rooms that are not accessible by students. Unit ventilators are located in the classrooms and other learning areas.
4.7 Multi-story buildings have at least two stairways for student egress 15 6
The building has multiple stairways, which are not enclosed, and are not ADA and OBC compliant.
4.8 Exterior doors open outward and are equipped with panic hardware 10 6
Exterior doors open outward but are not ADA compliant.
4.9 Emergency lighting is provided throughout the entire building with exit signs on separate electrical circuits 10 5
Emergency light fixtures and exit signs are not on separate circuits and are inadequately provided.
4.10 Classroom doors are recessed and open outward 10 8
Classroom doors are adequately recessed, most are provided with proper ADA clearances, and open outward.
4.11 Building security systems are provided to assure uninterrupted operation of the educational program 10 6
Security cameras monitored in the administrative reception area are provided throughout.
4.12 Flooring (including ramps and stairways) is maintained in a non-slip condition 5 2
VAT flooring is damaged and in poor condition throughout the facility.
4.13 Stair risers (interior and exterior) do not exceed 6 1/2 inches and range in number from 3 - 16 5 4
Stair treads and risers are properly designed and meet requirements.
4.14 Glass is properly located and protected with wire or safety material to prevent accidental student injury 5 4
Glass at door transoms and sidelights is protected for safety.
4.15 Fixed Projections in the traffic areas do not extend more than eight inches from the corridor wall 5 2
Classroom doorways are not completely recessed and impede traffic flow.
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Suitability Appraisal of 4.0 Building Safety and Security for Edgewood_High_School_2008_Assessment_April_2019_EEA_02_11_20 Page 43
4.16 Traffic areas terminate at an exit or a stairway leading to an egress 5 1
Building contains four (4) corridor security grilles which when in the closed position create dead-end corridor conditions.
Emergency Safety Points Allocated Points
4.17 Adequate fire safety equipment is properly located 15 6
The facility is not sprinkled. Fire alarm devices are not provided adequately. Fire extinguishers are inadequately provided.
4.18 There are at least two independent exits from any point in the building 15 3
Building contains four (4) corridor security grilles which when in the closed position create dead-end corridor conditions.
4.19 Fire-resistant materials are used throughout the structure 15 12
The overall facility has a combination of brick veneer on a masonry load bearing wall system and a steel framed system. Interior walls are concrete masonry units,
glazed block and metal stud framed partitions with gypsum board.
4.20 Automatic and manual emergency alarm system with a distinctive sound and flashing light is provided 15 8
The fire alarm is provided with manual and automatic actuation, but is not provided with visual indicating devices in all required areas.
TOTAL - 4.0 Building Safety and Security 200 119
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Suitability Appraisal of 4.0 Building Safety and Security for Edgewood_High_School_2008_Assessment_April_2019_EEA_02_11_20 Page 44
Suitability Appraisal of 5.0 Educational Adequacy for Edgewood_High_School_2008_Assessment_April_2019_EEA_02_11_20
Bottom of page
Suitability Appraisal of 5.0 Educational Adequacy for Edgewood_High_School_2008_Assessment_April_2019_EEA_02_11_20
5.0 Educational Adequacy Points Allocated Points
Academic Learning Space
5.1 Size of academic learning areas meets desirable standards 25 15
The average classroom is 860 SF compared to 900 SF required by the OSDM.
5.2 Classroom space permits arrangements for small group activity 15 11
Classrooms are large enough to allow effective small group activity spaces.
5.3 Location of academic learning areas is near related educational activities and away from disruptive noise 10 8
The gymnasium and music program are properly isolated from the academic learning areas to reduce distractions.
5.4 Personal space in the classroom away from group instruction allows privacy time for individual students 10 6
Undersized classrooms do not permit privacy time for individual students.
5.5 Storage for student materials is adequate 10 8
Lockers, located in the corridor, are adequately provided for student storage.
5.6 Storage for teacher materials is adequate 10 4
Miscellaneous wood and metal shelving units are inadequately provided for teacher storage.
Special Learning Space Points Allocated Points
5.7 Size of special learning area(s) meets standards 15 3
Special education classrooms are undersized compared to standards.
5.8 Design of specialized learning area(s) is compatible with instructional need 10 4
There are no specific support spaces such as a resource center or a restroom.
5.9 Library/Resource/Media Center provides appropriate and attractive space 10 4
The library is not visually appealing and does not provide natural light.
5.10 Gymnasium (or covered P.E. area) adequately serves physical education instruction 5 4
The gymnasium space is adequately sized and equipped for physical education instruction.
5.11 ES Pre-kindergarten and kindergarten space is appropriate for age of students and nature of instructionMS/HS Science program is provided sufficient space and equipment
10 8
Science classrooms are appropriately sized and equipped for effective science instruction except for compressed air connections.
5.12 Music Program is provided adequate sound treated space 5 4
The music room is designed appropriately, including acoustic panels on walls and ceilings.
5.13 Space for art is appropriate for special instruction, supplies, and equipment 5 4
The art room is appropriately designed for instruction and includes sufficient space for storage of supplies and equipment.
School Facility Appraisal Points Allocated Points
5.14 Space for technology education permits use of state-of-the-art equipment 5 3
The facility is provided with computer labs for student use.
5.15 Space for small groups and remedial instruction is provided adjacent to classrooms 5 2
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Suitability Appraisal of 5.0 Educational Adequacy for Edgewood_High_School_2008_Assessment_April_2019_EEA_02_11_20 Page 45
No spaces have been provided adjacent to classrooms for small groups or remedial instruction.
5.16 Storage for student and teacher material is adequate 5 3
Lockers, located in the corridor, are adequately provided for student storage. Miscellaneous wood and metal shelving units are inadequately provided for teacher
storage.
Support Space Points Allocated Points
5.17 Teacher’s lounge and work areas reflect teachers as professionals 10 4
The teacher’s lounge does not reflect a professional environment. Limited work space is provided for preparation of teacher materials.
5.18 Cafeteria/Kitchen is attractive with sufficient space for seating/dining, delivery, storage, and food preparation 10 6
The student dining space is 4,253 SF compared to 4,206 SF recommended in the OSDM. The kitchen space is 2,043 SF compared to 2,774 SF recommended in the
OSDM. The student dining space is located in a ’’commons’’ type area and has limited visual appeal.
5.19 Administrative offices provided are consistent in appearance and function with the maturity of the students served 5 4
Administrative offices are adequately provided for high school aged students.
5.20 Counselor’s office insures privacy and sufficient storage 5 3
The space provided for the counselor does insure privacy, but lacks sufficient storage space.
5.21 Clinic is near administrative offices and is equipped to meet requirements 5 4
The clinic is located adjacent to the administrative offices and is provided with required equipment.
5.22 Suitable reception space is available for students, teachers, and visitors 5 4
Reception space is adequate in size and placed adjacent to the front entry door for supervision.
5.23 Administrative personnel are provided sufficient work space and privacy 5 4
Administrative personnel have private offices directly off internal office corridor which provides privacy.
TOTAL - 5.0 Educational Adequacy 200 120
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Suitability Appraisal of 5.0 Educational Adequacy for Edgewood_High_School_2008_Assessment_April_2019_EEA_02_11_20 Page 46
Suitability Appraisal of 6.0 Environment for Education for Edgewood_High_School_2008_Assessment_April_2019_EEA_02_11_20
Bottom of page
Suitability Appraisal of 6.0 Environment for Education for Edgewood_High_School_2008_Assessment_April_2019_EEA_02_11_20
6.0 Environment for Education Points Allocated Points
Exterior Environment
6.1 Overall design is aesthetically pleasing to age of students 15 11
The building is a period 1960 design which has an aesthetic appeal.
6.2 Site and building are well landscaped 10 6
The site is moderately landscaped with mature shade trees, ornamental trees, and shrubs which define the property and emphasize the building entrance. Lawn areas
where mowing is required do not exceed 3:1 slope. The site has not been developed with outdoor learning spaces and athletic fields to enhance the learning environment.
6.3 Exterior noise and poor environment do not disrupt learning 10 8
The site is adjacent to residential and agricultural uses, and there are no undesirable features adjacent to the school site.
6.4 Entrances and walkways are sheltered from sun and inclement weather 10 7
Exits are sheltered from sun and inclement weather with shallow roof coverings. Walks are not sheltered.
6.5 Building materials provide attractive color and texture 5 4
Interior building materials consist of glazed block, brick, painted block and painted plaster which does provide an attractive color and texture.
Interior Environment Points Allocated Points
6.6 Color schemes, building materials, and decor provide an impetus to learning 20 17
School colors are reflected in the athletic areas. The use of repeated colors and materials gives the building some unity and a sense of consistency, which enhances
the learning environment.
6.7 Year around comfortable temperature and humidity are provided throughout the building 15 9
The facility is partially air conditioned to provide year-round temperature and humidity control.
6.8 Ventilating system provides adequate quiet circulation of clean air and meets 15cfm VBC requirement 15 10
The ventilating systems do not provide an adequate quantity of ventilation air to the spaces. Ventilation systems introduce minimal noise into the teaching and learning
areas.
6.9 Lighting system provides proper intensity, diffusion, and distribution of illumination 15 6
The lighting system does not provide proper intensity in some areas. Location of lighting fixtures provides uneven distribution of illumination.
6.10 Drinking fountains and restroom facilities are conveniently located 15 12
Drinking fountains and restroom facilities are conveniently located.
6.11 Communication among students is enhanced by commons area(s) for socialization 10 9
There are areas for students to gather in the student dining areas, auditorium, and gymnasium, as well as a small gathering area at the entrance to the school and
grassy areas behind the school.
6.12 Traffic flow is aided by appropriate foyers and corridors 10 6
Classroom doorways are not recessed and impede traffic flow.
6.13 Areas for students to interact are suitable to the age group 10 8
There are areas for students to gather in the student dining areas, auditorium, and gymnasium, as well as a small gathering area at the entrance to the school and
grassy areas behind the school all of which suit the age of the students.
6.14 Large group areas are designed for effective management of students 10 8
The gymnasium and auditorium are adequately designed to manage large groups of students.
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Suitability Appraisal of 6.0 Environment for Education for Edgewood_High_School_2008_Assessment_April_2019_EEA_02_11_20 Page 47
6.15 Acoustical treatment of ceilings, walls, and floors provides effective sound control 10 6
Limited consideration has been given to acoustical treatment of classrooms and corridors.
6.16 Window design contributes to a pleasant environment 10 7
The windows are fairly well designed to contribute to a pleasant environment.
6.17 Furniture and equipment provide a pleasing atmosphere 10 5
Classroom furniture is mismatched and in fair to poor condition.
TOTAL - 6.0 Environment for Education 200 139
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Suitability Appraisal of 6.0 Environment for Education for Edgewood_High_School_2008_Assessment_April_2019_EEA_02_11_20 Page 48
LEED Observation NotesSchool District: Buckeye Local SD
County: Ashtabula
School District IRN: 45856
Building: Edgewood High School
Building IRN: 9936
Sustainable Sites
Construction process can have a harmful effect on local ecology, especially when buildings are build on productive agricultural, wildlife or open areas. Several measures can be
take however to prevent the impact on undeveloped lands or to improve previously contaminated sites. Appropriate location reduces the need for private transportation and helps
to prevent an increase in air pollution. Developing buildings in urban areas and on brownfield sites instead of greenfield locations has economical and environmental benefits.
Controlling stormwater runoff and erosion can prevent the worsening of water quality in receiving bodies of water and the impact on aquatic life. Once the building is constructed,
it’s important to decrease heat island effects and reduce the light pollution on the site.
(source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:9)
Water Efficiency
In the US ca. 340 billion gallons of fresh water are withdrawn daily from surface sources, 65% of which is discharged later after use. Water is also withdrawn from underground
aquifers The excessive usage of water results in the current water deficit, estimated at 3,700 billion gallons. Water efficiency measures in commercial buildings can reduce water
usage by at least 30%. Low-flow fixtures, sensors or using non potable water for landscape irrigation, toilet flushing and building systems are just some of available strategies. Not
only do they result in environmental savings, but also bring about financial benefits, related to lower water use fees, lower sewage volumes to treat and energy use reductions.
(source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:65)
Energy & Atmosphere
Buildings in the US account for more than 30% of the total energy use and for approximately 60% of electricity. 75% of energy is derived from the burning of fossil fuels, which
releases CO2 into the Atmosphere and contributes to global warming. Moreover, coal fired electric utilities release nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide, where the former contribute
to smog and the latter to acid rain. Other types of energy production are not less harmful. Burning of natural gas produces nitrogen oxides and greenhouse gases as well, nuclear
power creates nuclear wastes, while hydroelectric generating plants disrupt natural water flows. Luckily there are several practices that can reduce energy consumption and are
environmentally and economically beneficial. Not only will they reduce the air pollution and mitigate global warming thanks to being less dependent on power plants, but also they
will reduce operational costs and will quickly pay back. In order to make the most of those practices, it’s important to adopt a holistic approach to the building’s energy load and
integrate different energy saving strategies.
(source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:93)
Material & Resources
The steps related to process building materials, such as extraction, processing and transportation are not environmentally natural, as they pollute the air, water and use natural
resources. Construction and demolition wastes account for 40% of the solid waste stream in the US. Reusing existing documents is one of the best strategies to reduce solid
wastes volumes and prevents then from ending up at landfills. It also reduces habitat disturbance and minimizes the need for the surrounding infrastructure. While using new
materials one should take into account different material sources. Salvaged materials provide savings on material costs, recycled content material minimizes waste products and
local materials reduce the environmental impact of transportation. Finally, using rapidly renewable materials and certified wood decreases the consumption of natural resources.
Recycling and reusing construction waste is another strategy to be taken into consideration in sustainable design.
(source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:167)
Indoor Environmental Quality
As we spend a big majority of our time indoors, the emphasis should be put on optimal indoor environmental quality strategies while (re)designing a building . Otherwise, a poor
IEQ will have adverse effects on occupants’ health, productivity and quality of life. IEQ strategies such as ventilation effectiveness and control of contaminants or a building
flush-out prior to occupancy can reduce potential liability, increase the market value of the building but can also result in a significantly higher productivity (16%). Other strategies
involve automatic sensors and controls, introducing fresh air to the building or providing lots of daylighting views.
(source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:215)
Innovation & Design Process
This category is aimed at recognizing projects that implemented innovative building features and sustainable building knowledge, and whose strategy or measure results
exceeded those which are required by the LEED Rating System. Expertise in sustainable design is the key element of the innovative design and construction process.
(source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:271)
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53<Untitled> Page 49
Justification for Allocation of Points
Building Name and Level: Edgewood High School
9-12
Building features that clearly exceed criteria:
1. Building contains an auditorium.
2. Building is very well maintained.
3. Large site provides athletic and learning opportunities.
4. Wood shop area is well equipped and large in size.
5.
6.
Building features that are non-existent or very inadequate:
1. Building is not ADA compliant.
2. Building is not fire suppressed.
3. Building is not fully air conditioned.
4.
5.
6.
Back to Assessment Summary
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53Justification for Allocation of Points Page 50
Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost EstimatesOwner: Buckeye Local SD
Facility: Edgewood High School
Date of Initial Assessment: Apr 14, 2008
Date of Assessment Update: Feb 13, 2020
Cost Set: 2019
District IRN: 45856
Building IRN: 9936
Firm: Hammond Construction
Scope remains unchanged after cost updates.
Building Addition Addition Area (sf)Total of Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates
Renovation Demolition
1961 (01) 1961 Original Construction 110,862 $404,016.20 $394,016.20
1961 (02) 1961 Auditorium 7,764 $44,231.40 $44,231.40
1972 (03) 1972 Addition (Media Center) 5,692 $20,290.20 $20,290.20
Total 124,318 $468,537.80 $458,537.80
Total with Regional Cost Factor (104.88%) — $491,402.44 $480,914.44
Regional Total with Soft Costs & Contingency — $611,453.54 $598,403.29
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53<Untitled> Page 51
Environmental Hazards(Enhanced) - Buckeye Local SD (45856) - Edgewood High School (9936) - (01) 1961 Original Construction
Environmental Hazards(Enhanced) - Buckeye Local SD (45856) - Edgewood High School (9936) - (01) 1961 Original Construction
Owner: Buckeye Local SD Bldg. IRN: 9936
Facility: Edgewood High School BuildingAdd: (01) 1961 Original Construction
Date On-Site: 2019-11-20 Consultant Name: Jordan Mederer
A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) AFM=Asbestos Free Material ACM Found Status Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost
1. Boiler/Furnace Insulation Removal Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material 0 $10.00 $0.00 2. Breeching Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.00 3. Tank Insulation Removal Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material 200 $8.00 $1,600.00 4. Duct Insulation Removal Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material 240 $8.00 $1,920.00 5. Pipe Insulation Removal Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material 800 $10.00 $8,000.00 6. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $20.00 $0.00 7. Pipe Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel) Not Present 0 $12.00 $0.00 8. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel) Not Present 0 $30.00 $0.00 9. Pipe Insulation Removal (Hidden in Walls/Ceilings) Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material 2220 $15.00 $33,300.00 10. Dismantling of Boiler/Furnace/Incinerator Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 11. Flexible Duct Connection Removal Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material 12 $100.00 $1,200.00 12. Acoustical Plaster Removal Reported Asbestos-Containing Material 7000 $7.00 $49,000.00 13. Fireproofing Removal Not Present 0 $25.00 $0.00 14. Hard Plaster Removal Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material 0 $7.00 $0.00 15. Gypsum Board Removal Not Present 0 $6.00 $0.00 16. Acoustical Panel/Tile Ceiling Removal Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material 0 $3.00 $0.00 17. Laboratory Table/Counter Top Removal Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material 70 $100.00 $7,000.00 18. Cement Board Removal Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material 1050 $5.00 $5,250.00 19. Electric Cord Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $1.00 $0.00 20. Light (Reflector) Fixture Removal Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material 2 $50.00 $100.00 21. Sheet Flooring with Friable Backer Removal Not Present 0 $4.00 $0.00 22. Fire Door Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 23. Door and Window Panel Removal Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material 33 $100.00 $3,300.00 24. Decontamination of Crawlspace/Chase/Tunnel Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.00 25. Soil Removal Not Present 0 $150.00 $0.00 26. Non-ACM Ceiling/Wall Removal (for access) Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material 8880 $2.00 $17,760.00 27. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno & Demo Reported Asbestos-Containing Material 140 $300.00 $42,000.00 28. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno Only Reported Asbestos-Containing Material 140 $300.00 $42,000.00 29. Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material 40000 $3.00 $120,000.00 30. Carpet Mastic Removal Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.00 31. Carpet Removal (over RFC) Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material 2000 $1.00 $2,000.00 32. Acoustical Tile Mastic Removal Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.00 33. Sink Undercoating Removal Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material 0 $100.00 $0.00 34. Roofing Removal Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material 0 $2.00 $0.00 35. Chalkboard Mastic Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material lump sum $16,500.0036. (Sum of Lines 1-35) Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work $352,930.0037. (Sum of Lines 1-35) Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work $352,930.00
B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks None Reported
Tank No. Location Age Product Stored Size Est.Rem.Cost1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks $0.00
C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only Addition Constructed after 19801. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups $5,000.00 2. Special Engineering Fees for LBP Mock-Ups $5,000.00 3. (Sum of Lines 1-2) Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups $10,000.00
D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration Not Applicable Area Of Building Addition Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Unit Cost Total Cost
1. 110862 110862 $0.10 $11,086.20
E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks None ReportedDescription Cost Estimate
1.ACM duct insulation observed in wood shop aove ceiling in wood shop hallway. May be present in other inaccessible areas/above ceilings $10,000.002. (Sum of Lines 1-1) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Renovation $10,000.003. (Sum of Lines 1-1) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Demolition $10,000.00
F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries1. A36, B1, C3, D1, and E2 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation $384,016.202. A37, B1, D1, and E3 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition $374,016.20
* INSPECTION ASSUMPTIONS for Reported/Assumed Asbestos-Free Materials (Rep/Asm AFM):
a. Unless reported otherwise by the District, materials installed after 1980 are assumed to be asbestos-free.
b. Unless reported otherwise by the District, small quantities (less than 1,000 square feet) of the following materials are assumed to be asbestos free: hard plaster,acoustical plaster and gypsum board systems; acoustical panels and tiles; fireproofing; 12"×12" floor tile and mastic.
c. Unless reported otherwise by the District, all roofing materials are assumed to be asbestos-free.
THESE MATERIALS SHOULD BE PROPERLY SAMPLED AND ANALYZED FOR ASBESTOS PRIOR TO DISTURBING THEM.
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53<Untitled> Page 52
Environmental Hazards(Enhanced) - Buckeye Local SD (45856) - Edgewood High School (9936) - (02) 1961 Auditorium
Environmental Hazards(Enhanced) - Buckeye Local SD (45856) - Edgewood High School (9936) - (02) 1961 Auditorium
Owner: Buckeye Local SD Bldg. IRN: 9936
Facility: Edgewood High School BuildingAdd: (02) 1961 Auditorium
Date On-Site: 2019-11-20 Consultant Name: Jordan Mederer
A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) AFM=Asbestos Free Material ACM Found Status Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost
1. Boiler/Furnace Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.00 2. Breeching Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.00 3. Tank Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.00 4. Duct Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.00 5. Pipe Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.00 6. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $20.00 $0.00 7. Pipe Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel) Not Present 0 $12.00 $0.00 8. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel) Not Present 0 $30.00 $0.00 9. Pipe Insulation Removal (Hidden in Walls/Ceilings) Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material 1885 $15.00 $28,275.00 10. Dismantling of Boiler/Furnace/Incinerator Not Present 0 $2,000.00 $0.00 11. Flexible Duct Connection Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 12. Acoustical Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.00 13. Fireproofing Removal Not Present 0 $25.00 $0.00 14. Hard Plaster Removal Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material 0 $7.00 $0.00 15. Gypsum Board Removal Not Present 0 $6.00 $0.00 16. Acoustical Panel/Tile Ceiling Removal Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material 0 $3.00 $0.00 17. Laboratory Table/Counter Top Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 18. Cement Board Removal Not Present 0 $5.00 $0.00 19. Electric Cord Insulation Removal Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material 100 $1.00 $100.00 20. Light (Reflector) Fixture Removal Not Present 0 $50.00 $0.00 21. Sheet Flooring with Friable Backer Removal Not Present 0 $4.00 $0.00 22. Fire Door Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 23. Door and Window Panel Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 24. Decontamination of Crawlspace/Chase/Tunnel Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.00 25. Soil Removal Not Present 0 $150.00 $0.00 26. Non-ACM Ceiling/Wall Removal (for access) Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material 7540 $2.00 $15,080.00 27. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno & Demo Not Present 0 $300.00 $0.00 28. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno Only Not Present 0 $300.00 $0.00 29. Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.00 30. Carpet Mastic Removal Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material 0 $2.00 $0.00 31. Carpet Removal (over RFC) Not Present 0 $1.00 $0.00 32. Acoustical Tile Mastic Removal Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.00 33. Sink Undercoating Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 34. Roofing Removal Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material 0 $2.00 $0.00 35. Fire Curtain Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material lump sum $20,000.0036. (Sum of Lines 1-35) Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work $63,455.0037. (Sum of Lines 1-35) Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work $63,455.00
B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks None Reported
Tank No. Location Age Product Stored Size Est.Rem.Cost1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks $0.00
C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only Addition Constructed after 19801. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups $0.00 2. Special Engineering Fees for LBP Mock-Ups $0.00 3. (Sum of Lines 1-2) Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups $0.00
D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration Not Applicable Area Of Building Addition Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Unit Cost Total Cost
1. 7764 7764 $0.10 $776.40
E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks None ReportedDescription Cost Estimate
1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Renovation $0.002. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Demolition $0.00
F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries1. A36, B1, C3, D1, and E1 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation $64,231.402. A37, B1, D1, and E2 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition $64,231.40
* INSPECTION ASSUMPTIONS for Reported/Assumed Asbestos-Free Materials (Rep/Asm AFM):
a. Unless reported otherwise by the District, materials installed after 1980 are assumed to be asbestos-free.
b. Unless reported otherwise by the District, small quantities (less than 1,000 square feet) of the following materials are assumed to be asbestos free: hard plaster,acoustical plaster and gypsum board systems; acoustical panels and tiles; fireproofing; 12"×12" floor tile and mastic.
c. Unless reported otherwise by the District, all roofing materials are assumed to be asbestos-free.
THESE MATERIALS SHOULD BE PROPERLY SAMPLED AND ANALYZED FOR ASBESTOS PRIOR TO DISTURBING THEM.
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53<Untitled> Page 53
Environmental Hazards(Enhanced) - Buckeye Local SD (45856) - Edgewood High School (9936) - (03) 1972 Addition (Media Center)
Environmental Hazards(Enhanced) - Buckeye Local SD (45856) - Edgewood High School (9936) - (03) 1972 Addition (Media Center)
Owner: Buckeye Local SD Bldg. IRN: 9936
Facility: Edgewood High School BuildingAdd: (03) 1972 Addition (Media Center)
Date On-Site: 2019-11-20 Consultant Name: Jordan Mederer
A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) AFM=Asbestos Free Material ACM Found Status Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost
1. Boiler/Furnace Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.00 2. Breeching Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.00 3. Tank Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.00 4. Duct Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.00 5. Pipe Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.00 6. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $20.00 $0.00 7. Pipe Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel) Not Present 0 $12.00 $0.00 8. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel) Not Present 0 $30.00 $0.00 9. Pipe Insulation Removal (Hidden in Walls/Ceilings) Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material 115 $15.00 $1,725.00 10. Dismantling of Boiler/Furnace/Incinerator Not Present 0 $2,000.00 $0.00 11. Flexible Duct Connection Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 12. Acoustical Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.00 13. Fireproofing Removal Not Present 0 $25.00 $0.00 14. Hard Plaster Removal Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material 0 $7.00 $0.00 15. Gypsum Board Removal Not Present 0 $6.00 $0.00 16. Acoustical Panel/Tile Ceiling Removal Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material 0 $3.00 $0.00 17. Laboratory Table/Counter Top Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 18. Cement Board Removal Not Present 0 $5.00 $0.00 19. Electric Cord Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $1.00 $0.00 20. Light (Reflector) Fixture Removal Not Present 0 $50.00 $0.00 21. Sheet Flooring with Friable Backer Removal Not Present 0 $4.00 $0.00 22. Fire Door Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 23. Door and Window Panel Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 24. Decontamination of Crawlspace/Chase/Tunnel Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.00 25. Soil Removal Not Present 0 $150.00 $0.00 26. Non-ACM Ceiling/Wall Removal (for access) Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material 460 $2.00 $920.00 27. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno & Demo Not Present 0 $300.00 $0.00 28. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno Only Not Present 0 $300.00 $0.00 29. Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic Reported Asbestos-Containing Material 5692 $3.00 $17,076.00 30. Carpet Mastic Removal Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.00 31. Carpet Removal (over RFC) Not Present 0 $1.00 $0.00 32. Acoustical Tile Mastic Removal Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.00 33. Sink Undercoating Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 34. Roofing Removal Reported / Assumed Asbestos-Free Material 0 $2.00 $0.00 35. (Sum of Lines 1-34) Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work $19,721.0036. (Sum of Lines 1-34) Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work $19,721.00
B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks None Reported
Tank No. Location Age Product Stored Size Est.Rem.Cost1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks $0.00
C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only Addition Constructed after 19801. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups $0.00 2. Special Engineering Fees for LBP Mock-Ups $0.00 3. (Sum of Lines 1-2) Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups $0.00
D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration Not Applicable Area Of Building Addition Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Unit Cost Total Cost
1. 5692 5692 $0.10 $569.20
E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks None ReportedDescription Cost Estimate
1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Renovation $0.002. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Demolition $0.00
F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries1. A35, B1, C3, D1, and E1 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation $20,290.202. A36, B1, D1, and E2 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition $20,290.20
* INSPECTION ASSUMPTIONS for Reported/Assumed Asbestos-Free Materials (Rep/Asm AFM):
a. Unless reported otherwise by the District, materials installed after 1980 are assumed to be asbestos-free.
b. Unless reported otherwise by the District, small quantities (less than 1,000 square feet) of the following materials are assumed to be asbestos free: hard plaster,acoustical plaster and gypsum board systems; acoustical panels and tiles; fireproofing; 12"×12" floor tile and mastic.
c. Unless reported otherwise by the District, all roofing materials are assumed to be asbestos-free.
THESE MATERIALS SHOULD BE PROPERLY SAMPLED AND ANALYZED FOR ASBESTOS PRIOR TO DISTURBING THEM.
Report Generated at 13 Feb 2020 08:53<Untitled> Page 54