building information - marietta city sd †44321‡ - …...building information - marietta city sd...

Building Information - Marietta City SD (44321) - Marietta Middle School

Program Type Classroom Facilities Assistance Program (CFAP) - Regular

Setting Small City

Assessment Name Marietta_Middle_School_2008_EEA_02_15_19_Update

Assessment Date (on-site; non-EEA) 2017-10-25

Kitchen Type Warming Kitchen

Cost Set: 2019

Building Name Marietta Middle School

Building IRN 22780

Building Address 242 Seventh St.

Building City Marietta

Building Zipcode 45750

Building Phone 740-374-6530

Acreage 27.00

Current Grades: 6-8

Teaching Stations 36

Number of Floors 3

Student Capacity 918

Current Enrollment 630

Enrollment Date 2017-10-25

Enrollment Date is the date in which the current enrollment was taken.

Number of Classrooms 58

Historical Register NO

Building’s Principal Ms. Brittany Schob

Building Type Middle

Next Page

Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:19Building Information - Marietta City SD (44321) - Marietta Middle School

Building Pictures - Marietta City SD(44321) - Marietta Middle School(22780)

North elevation photo: East elevation photo:

South elevation photo: West elevation photo:

GENERAL DESCRIPTION

128,671 Total Existing Square Footage

1926,1929,1951,1991 Building Dates

6-8 Grades

630 Current Enrollment

36 Teaching Stations

27.00 Site Acreage

Marietta Middle School, which is not on the National Register of Historic Buildings, and originally constructed in 1926, is a 3 story, 128,671 square foot brick school buildinglocated in a urban residential and commercial setting. The existing facility features a conventionally partitioned design, and does not utilize modular buildings. The structure of theoverall facility contains masonry type exterior wall construction, with masonry type wall construction in the interior. The floor system consists of structural slab. The roof structure iswooden steel framed. The roofing system of the overall facility is asphalt shingles and built-up roof with a foam overspray installed over 12 years ago. The ventilation system of thebuilding is inadequate to meet the needs of the users. The Classrooms are undersized in terms of the current standards established by the State of Ohio. Physical Education andStudent Dining spaces consist of 10,501 SF Primary Gymnasium with 2,163 SF Auxiliary Gymnasium and separate Student Dining. The electrical system for the facility isinadequate. The facility is equipped with a non-compliant security system. The facility is not equipped with an automated fire suppression system. The building is reported tocontain asbestos tiles. The overall building is not compliant with ADA accessibility requirements. The school is located on a 27 acre site adjacent to residential and properties. Theproperty and play areas and athletic facilities are partially fenced for security. Access onto the site is unrestricted. Site circulation is fair. There is dedicated space for school busesto load and unload on the site, on the playground. Parking for staff, visitors and community events is adequate but disorganized.

No Significant Findings

Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:19Building Pictures - Marietta City SD(44321) - Marietta Middle School(22780)

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:19Building Pictures - Marietta City SD(44321) - Marietta Middle School(22780)

Building Construction Information - Marietta City SD (44321) - Marietta Middle School (22780)

Name Year Handicapped Access Floors Square Feet Non OSDM Addition Built Under ELPP

Academic Building 1926 yes 4 82,757 no no

Original Construction - Gymnasium Addition 1929 no 4 38,684 no no

District IT Offices (Upper Level), Locker Room/Athletic Dept. Stor (Lower Level) 1951 no 2 5,948 no no

Enclosed Walkway and Elevator 1991 yes 3 1,282 no no

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:19Building Construction Information - Marietta City SD (44321) - Marietta Middle School (22780)

Building Component Information - Marietta City SD (44321) - Marietta Middle School (22780)

AdditionAuditorium

Fixed Seating

CorridorsAgriculturalEducation

Lab

PrimaryGymnasium

MediaCenter

VocationalSpace

StudentDining

Kitchen NatatoriumIndoorTracks

AdultEducation

BoardOffices

OutsideAgencies

AuxiliaryGymnasium

Academic Building (1926)

15859 3769

Original Construction -Gymnasium Addition (1929)

4096 10501 5057 1525 2163

District IT Offices(Upper Level), LockerRoom/Athletic Dept.Stor (Lower Level) (1951)

471

Enclosed Walkway andElevator (1991)

631

Total 0 21,057 0 10,501 3,769 0 5,057 1,525 0 0 0 0 0 2,163

Master Planning Considerations

Previous Page

Next Page

Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:19Building Component Information - Marietta City SD (44321) - Marietta Middle School (22780)

Existing CT Programs for AssessmentNext Page

Previous Page

Program Type Program Name Related Space Square Feet

No Records Found

Legend:

Not in current design manual

In current design manual but missing from assessment

Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:19<Untitled>

Main Assessment Menu - Marietta City SD (44321) - Marietta Middle School (22780)

Building Summary - Marietta Middle School (22780)

District: Marietta City SD

Name: Marietta Middle School

Address: 242 Seventh St.

Marietta,OH 45750

Bldg. IRN: 22780

County: Washington Area: Southeastern Ohio (6)

Contact: Ms. Brittany Schob

Phone: 740-374-6530

Date Prepared: 2017-10-25 By: Tony Schorr

Date Revised: 2019-02-15 By: Jeff Tuckerman

Current Grades 6-8 Acreage: 27.00

Proposed Grades N/A Teaching Stations: 36

Current Enrollment 630 Classrooms: 58

Projected Enrollment N/A

Addition Date HA Number of Floors

CurrentSquare Feet

Academic Building 1926 yes 4 82,757

Original Construction - Gymnasium Addition 1929 no 4 38,684

District IT Offices (Upper Level), LockerRoom/Athletic Dept. Stor (Lower Level)

1951 no 2 5,948

Enclosed Walkway and Elevator 1991 yes 3 1,282

Total 128,671

*HA = Handicapped Access

*Rating =1 Satisfactory

=2 Needs Repair

=3 Needs Replacement

*Const P/S = Present/Scheduled Construction

FACILITY ASSESSMENTCost Set: 2019 Rating Dollar Assessment C

A. Heating System 3 $4,503,485.00 -

B. Roofing 3 $486,251.20 -

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning 1 $0.00 -

D. Electrical Systems 3 $2,165,532.93 -

E. Plumbing and Fixtures 2 $900,697.00 -

F. Windows 3 $1,167,260.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation 2 $20,000.00 -

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 3 $263,475.00 -

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs 1 $0.00 -

J. General Finishes 3 $2,890,929.82 -

K. Interior Lighting 3 $836,361.50 -

L. Security Systems 2 $302,376.85 -

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting 3 $128,671.00 -

N. Fire Alarm 3 $289,509.75 -

O. Handicapped Access 3 $42,900.00 -

P. Site Condition 3 $754,654.00 -

Q. Sewage System 1 $0.00 -

R. Water Supply 1 $0.00 -

S. Exterior Doors 3 $20,000.00 -

- T. Hazardous Material 3 $361,323.90 -

U. Life Safety 3 $509,247.20 -

V. Loose Furnishings 3 $828,028.50 -

W. Technology 3 $1,320,676.00 -

- X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost

- $4,346,487.42 -

Total $22,137,867.07

Suitability Appraisal Summary

SectionPoints

PossiblePoints Earned

PercentageRating

Category

Cover Sheet — — — —

1.0 The School Site 100 73 73% Satisfactory

2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features

200 129 65% Borderline

3.0 Plant Maintainability 100 66 66% Borderline

4.0 Building Safety and Security 200 144 72% Satisfactory

5.0 Educational Adequacy 200 132 66% Borderline

6.0 Environment for Education 200 135 68% Borderline

LEED Observations — — — —

Commentary — — — —

Total 1000 679 68% Borderline

Enhanced Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates

C=Under Contract

Renovation Cost Factor 101.86%

Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $22,549,631.40

The Replacement Cost Per SF and the Renovate/Replace ratio are only provided when this

summary is requested from a Master Plan.

Previous Page

Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:19Main Assessment Menu - Marietta City SD (44321) - Marietta Middle School (22780)


Academic Building (1926) Summary




Marietta,OH 45750

Bldg. IRN: 22780



Phone: 740-374-6530








CurrentSquare Feet




1951 no 2 5,948


Total 128,671



=2 Needs Repair





B. Roofing 3 $172,435.60 -


D. Electrical Systems 3 $1,392,800.31 -


F. Windows 3 $948,160.00 -




J. General Finishes 3 $1,927,110.46 -




N. Fire Alarm 3 $186,203.25 -





S. Exterior Doors 3 $20,000.00 -

- T. Hazardous Material 3 $361,323.90 -

U. Life Safety 3 $299,822.40 -


W. Technology 3 $897,450.00 -


- $2,867,989.27 -

Total $14,607,465.54


SectionPoints


PercentageRating

Category













C=Under Contract







Original Construction - Gymnasium Addition (1929) Summary




Marietta,OH 45750

Bldg. IRN: 22780



Phone: 740-374-6530








CurrentSquare Feet


Original Construction - Gymnasium Addition

1929 no 4 38,684


1951 no 2 5,948


Total 128,671



=2 Needs Repair



FACILITY ASSESSMENTCost Set: 2019 Rating

Dollar Assessment C


B. Roofing 3 $252,857.20 -


D. Electrical Systems 3 $651,051.72 -


F. Windows 3 $149,100.00 -




J. General Finishes 3 $820,279.52 -




N. Fire Alarm 3 $87,039.00 -





S. Exterior Doors 3 $0.00 -

- T. Hazardous Material 3 $0.00 -

U. Life Safety 3 $133,788.80 -


W. Technology 3 $358,156.00 -


- $1,225,804.48 -

Total $6,243,362.52


SectionPoints


PercentageRating

Category













C=Under Contract







District IT Offices (Upper Level), Locker Room/Athletic Dept. Stor (Lower Level) (1951) Summary




Marietta,OH 45750

Bldg. IRN: 22780



Phone: 740-374-6530








CurrentSquare Feet




1951 no 2 5,948


Total 128,671



=2 Needs Repair




A. Heating System 3 $208,180.00 -

B. Roofing 3 $47,256.80 -




F. Windows 3 $70,000.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation 2 $0.00 -



J. General Finishes 3 $143,539.84 -




N. Fire Alarm 3 $13,383.00 -







U. Life Safety 3 $71,533.60 -


W. Technology 3 $53,532.00 -

- X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost - $221,989.46 -

Total $1,130,653.94


SectionPoints


PercentageRating

Category













C=Under Contract







Enclosed Walkway and Elevator (1991) Summary




Marietta,OH 45750

Bldg. IRN: 22780



Phone: 740-374-6530








CurrentSquare Feet




1951 no 2 5,948


Total 128,671



=2 Needs Repair



FACILITY ASSESSMENTCost Set: 2019 Rating

Dollar Assessment C

A. Heating System 3 $44,870.00 -

B. Roofing 3 $13,701.60 -




F. Windows 3 $0.00 -

G. Structure: Foundation 2 $0.00 -

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys 3 $0.00 -


J. General Finishes 3 $0.00 -




N. Fire Alarm 3 $2,884.50 -

O. Handicapped Access 3 $0.00 -






U. Life Safety 3 $4,102.40 -

V. Loose Furnishings 3 $0.00 -

W. Technology 3 $11,538.00 -


- $30,704.21 -

Total $156,385.07


SectionPoints


PercentageRating

Category













C=Under Contract


Cost to Renovate (Cost Factor applied) $159,293.83




Facility Assessment

A. Heating System

Description: The overall structure has a hot water heating system, installed in 1994. That consists of three Lochinvar gas-fired boilers installed 2012 withoperating/standby primary pumps and four zoned circulating pumps. The hot water is distributed to unit ventilators in the classrooms, one heatingunit for the gymnasium and one air handler for the auditorium. The blower for the gymnasium was installed in 1926 and is in poor condition. Theadministrative offices are conditioned by a residential type furnaces with gas heat and direct expansion cooling. The system temperature controlsare basic DDC and are in satisfactory condition. The structure is not equipped with air conditioning, except for Student Dining which has (2)separate split systems.

Rating: 3 Needs Replacement

Recommendations: Provide new overall heating system to meet OSDM design standards, including air conditioning.

Item Cost Unit Whole Building

AcademicBuilding (1926)82,757 ft²

OriginalConstruction -GymnasiumAddition (1929)38,684 ft²

District IT Offices (UpperLevel), LockerRoom/Athletic Dept. Stor(Lower Level) (1951)5,948 ft²

EnclosedWalkway andElevator (1991)1,282 ft²

Sum Comments

HVAC System Replacement:

$27.00sq.ft. (ofentirebuilding addition)

Required Required Required Required $3,474,117.00(includes demo of existing systemand reconfiguration of piping layoutand new controls, air conditioning)

Convert ToDucted System


Required Required Required Required $1,029,368.00(includes costs for vert. & horz.chases, cut openings, soffits, etc.Must be used in addition to HVACSystem Replacement if the existingHVAC system is non-ducted)

Sum: $4,503,485.00$2,896,495.00 $1,353,940.00 $208,180.00 $44,870.00

Heating water boilers Heating water pumps

Back to Assessment Summary

Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:19Facility Assessment

Facility Assessment

B. Roofing

Description: The roof over the 1926 building is asphalt shingles with some rolled asphalt covered with spray foam that was installed in 1994, and is in poorcondition. The 1929, 1951 and 1991 additions have rolled asphalt covered in spray foam in bad condition. There are District reports of currentleaking at the 1926 juncture of flat to sloped roof. Signs of past leaking were observed during the physical assessment. Access to the roof wasgained by access hatch that is are in poor condition. Fall safety protection cages are not required. There were observations of standing water onthe roof. Metal cap flashings and stone copings are in poor condition. Roof storm drainage is addressed through a system of gutters anddownspouts and roof drains, which are properly located, and in poor condition. The roof is not equipped with overflow roof drains though they willbe required in areas of roof replacement. No problems requiring attention were encountered with any roof penetrations. There are not anycovered walkways attached to this structure, other than the enclosed, conditioned 1991 connection between the 1926 and 1929 additions.


Recommendations: The roof over the overall facility requires replacement to meet Ohio School Design Manual guidelines for age of system and due to condition.AND The flashing and coping on the overall facility require replacement due to condition. AND Existing gutters and downspouts and roof drainsrequire replacement.



Original Construction- GymnasiumAddition (1929)38,684 ft²

District IT Offices (UpperLevel), Locker Room/AthleticDept. Stor (Lower Level) (1951)5,948 ft²


Sum Comments

Asphalt Shingle: $3.00sq.ft. (Qty)

25,188 Required

$75,564.00

Built-up Asphalt: $13.20sq.ft. (Qty)

4,090 Required $53,988.00

Membrane (all types /fully adhered):

$10.00sq.ft. (Qty)

1,643 Required17,046 Required 2,974 Required 1,038 Required $227,010.00(unless under 10,000sq.ft.)

Gutters/Downspouts $13.10ln.ft. 1,160 Required $15,196.00

Overflow Roof Drains and Piping:

$3,000.00each 2 Required 8 Required 2 Required $36,000.00

Roof Insulation: $3.20sq.ft. (Qty)

1,643 Required17,046 Required 2,974 Required 1,038 Required $72,643.20(non-tapered insulationfor use in areas withoutdrainage problems)

Roof Access Hatch: $2,000.00each 1 Required $2,000.00(remove and replace)

Roof Access, Ladder &Fall Protection Cage:

$3,850.00each 1 Required $3,850.00(provide when no roofaccess currently exists)

Sum: $486,251.20 $172,435.60 $252,857.20 $47,256.80 $13,701.60

1926 Building Roof 1929 Addition Roof



Facility Assessment

C. Ventilation / Air Conditioning

Description: The overall facility is not equipped with air conditioning. Two split system furnaces with air cooled condensing units provide air conditioning for theadministrative offices. Two separate air handling units, with air cooled condensing units provide air conditioning for the Student Dining.

Rating: 1 Satisfactory

Recommendations: Provide an air conditioning system to meet OSDM design manual requirements. Pricing for this is included in Item A.

Item CostUnitWhole Building

Academic Building (1926)82,757 ft²

Original Construction -Gymnasium Addition (1929)38,684 ft²

District IT Offices (Upper Level), Locker Room/AthleticDept. Stor (Lower Level) (1951)5,948 ft²

Enclosed Walkway andElevator (1991)1,282 ft²

SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Condensing Unit Condensing Unit



Facility Assessment

D. Electrical Systems

Description: The school has 1600 Amp 480/277 Volt three phase four wire electrical service installed 1993. The new service back feeds all existing equipmentthrough a 225 kVA dry type transformer. Some new panels have been installed in the building for existing loads. Most of the equipment isoutdated. Most panels are fully loaded. There is not enough receptacles in classrooms.


Recommendations: Provide 2400 Amp 480/277 Volt service to accommodate future HVAC and technology loads. Provide pad-mounted transformer to accommodateincrease in electrical service. Replace all antiquated equipment, wiring and conduit for a complete electrical distribution system.






Sum Comments

System Replacement:


Required Required Required Required $2,088,330.33(Includes demo of existing system.Includes generator for life safetysystems. Does not include telephone ordata or equipment) (Use items belowONLY when the entire system is NOTbeing replaced)

Lightning Protection


Required Required Required Required $77,202.60

Sum: $2,165,532.93$1,392,800.31 $651,051.72 $100,104.84 $21,576.06

Main switchgear Origional MDP



Facility Assessment

E. Plumbing and Fixtures

Description: The school contains twelve floor mounted toilets, thirty wall mounted urinals, three Bradley wash fountains for boys and they are in goodcondition. The school contains thirty-four floor mounted toilets and three Bradley wash fountains for girls and they are in good condition. Theschool contains three floor mounted toilets, two wall mounted urinals and three lavatories for staff and they are in good condition. The schoolcontains eleven water coolers and they are in good condition. The water heater is electric tank type with storage. The unit was installed in 2014and is in good condition. The domestic water meter and a backflow preventer is provided and is in good condition.

Rating: 2 Needs Repair

Recommendations: Replace one water closet in the girl’s bathroom and one water closet in the boy’s bathroom of the 1929 gymnasium due to condition. See ’’O’’Handicap Access for additional fixture replacement. Replace domestic supply piping and sanitary piping in the entire building.




District IT Offices (Upper Level),Locker Room/Athletic Dept. Stor(Lower Level) (1951)5,948 ft²

Enclosed Walkwayand Elevator (1991)1,282 ft²

Sum Comments

DomesticSupply Piping:

$3.50sq.ft. (of entirebuilding addition)

Required Required Required Required $450,348.50(remove /replace)

SanitaryWaste Piping:


Required Required Required Required $450,348.50(remove /replace)

Sum: $900,697.00 $579,299.00 $270,788.00 $41,636.00 $8,974.00

Washfountain Wall-hung urinals



Facility Assessment

F. Windows

Description: The overall facility is equipped with mostly thermally broken, aluminum clad windows with double glazed insulated glazing type window system,which was installed in 1994, and is in fair condition. There are some older single glazed metal framed windows in the basement area. Windowsystem seals are in OK condition, with minimal air and water infiltration being experienced. Window system hardware is in fair condition. Thewindow system features surface mounted blinds, which are in fair condition. The window system is equipped with insect screen inserts onoperable windows, which are in fair condition. Aluminum or other type frame curtain wall systems are found in the 1991 Addition, in fair condition.There are glass block windows in the 1951 addition, in poor condition. The exterior doors in the 1991 addition are equipped with thermally brokenaluminum sidelights and transoms with double glazed insulated glazing, in fair condition. The school does contain 2 acrylic bubble type skylightsin poor condition. Window security grilles are not provided for ground floor windows. There is not a Greenhouse associated with this school.


Recommendations: Provide a new insulated window system with integral blinds to meet with Ohio School Design Manual requirements. The newest windows areover 20 years old. Storefront system at connection could probably stay. AND Replace 3 skylights in the overall facility.






Sum Comments

Insulated Glass/Panels:

$70.00sq.ft. (Qty)

13,488 Required 1,980 Required 1,000 Required $1,152,760.00(includesblinds)

Skylights: $125.00sq.ft. (Qty)

32 Required 84 Required $14,500.00(remove andreplace)

Sum: $1,167,260.00$948,160.00 $149,100.00 $70,000.00 $0.00

Double Hung Classroom Windows 1926 Building Windows



Facility Assessment

G. Structure: Foundation

Description: The overall facility is equipped with a mixture of concrete masonry unit concrete foundation walls on concrete footings, which displayed somelocations of significant differential settlement, cracking, or leaking, and are in fair condition. The District reports that there has been some pastleaking and have provided waterproofing. No grading or site drainage deficiencies were noted around the perimeter of the structure that arecontributing or could contribute to foundation / wall structural deterioration.


Recommendations: Repair some interior foundation cracking at 1926 Basement Boiler Area.






Sum Comments

Other:Repair cracks

$10,000.00allowance Required Required $20,000.00Repair misc. cracking at thefoundation walls in the 1926and 1929 buildings.

Sum: $20,000.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 $0.00

1929 Main Entry 1926 Building



Facility Assessment

H. Structure: Walls and Chimneys

Description: The overall facility has a brick veneer on a masonry bearing wall system, which displayed few locations of deterioration, and is in fair conditionfrom its age. The exterior masonry appears to have appropriately spaced and adequately caulked control joints in fair condition. Control joints areprovided at lintel locations at doors and windows and are in fair condition. The school does have sufficient expansion joints, and they are in faircondition. The exterior masonry has not been cleaned and sealed in recent years, and shows evidence of mortar deterioration in most locations.Architectural exterior accent materials consist of stone, which is in poor condition. Interior walls are concrete masonry units and glazed block andwood framed partitions with plaster and wood framed partitions with gypsum board and are in fair condition. Interior masonry appears to haveadequately spaced and caulked control joints in fair condition. The window sills are brick and stone and concrete, and are in fair condition. Theexterior lintels are steel, and are rusting, in poor condition. Chimneys are in fair condition.


Recommendations: Provide tuckpointing in all areas of mortar deterioration as required through the overall facility. AND / OR Provide masonry cleaning, sealing andcaulking as required through the overall facility. AND Recaulk existing control joints. AND Replace masonry lintel(s) as required through theoverall facility.






Sum Comments

Tuckpointing: $7.50sq.ft. (Qty)

1,000 Required 1,800 Required 100 Required $21,750.00(wall surface)

Exterior Masonry Cleaning:

$1.50sq.ft. (Qty)

35,000 Required

17,856 Required 6,000 Required $88,284.00(wall surface)

Exterior Masonry Sealing:

$1.00sq.ft. (Qty)

35,000 Required

17,856 Required 6,000 Required $58,856.00(wall surface)

Lintel Replacement: $250.00ln.ft. 100 Required 100 Required 50 Required $62,500.00(total removal andreplacement includingpinning and shoring)

Coping ReplacementPre-Finished Aluminum:

$22.50ln.ft. 1,176 Required 250 Required $32,085.00(removing existing copingand replacing)

Sum: $263,475.00 $120,000.00 $109,600.00 $33,875.00 $0.00

1926 Building Chimneys 1926 Facade



Facility Assessment

I. Structure: Floors and Roofs

Description: The floor construction of the first floor of the overall facility is cast-in-place concrete type construction, and is in fair condition. There is some crawlspace. Crawl space is located under 1926 section of the facility. There is a basement in the 1926, 1929 and 1951 additions if dropped. The floorconstruction of the intermediate floors second floor of the overall facility is metal form deck cast-in-place concrete type construction, and is in fairto poor condition. Ceiling to structural deck spaces are sufficient to accommodate HVAC, electrical, and plumbing scopes of work in requiredrenovations. Ceilings are added. The roof construction of the overall facility is steel at the 1929 addition with wood deck and wood trusses withwood deck at 1926 addition type construction, and is in fair condition.


Recommendations: No work.






SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

1926 Bottom of Second Floor Structure 1929 Gym Steel Trusses



Facility Assessment

J. General Finishes

Description: The overall facility features conventionally partitioned Classrooms with VCT type flooring, plaster and ACT type ceilings, as well as paint type wallfinishes, and they are in fair condition. The overall facility has Corridors with VCT type flooring, plaster and ACT type ceilings, as well as painttype wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. The overall facility has Restrooms with ceramic tile type flooring, plaster and ACT type ceilings,as well as ceramic tile type wall finishes, and they are in poor condition. Toilet partitions are metal, and are in poor condition. Typical Classroomsdo not have casework, there are some wood and metal type construction with plastic laminate or other tops provided, and in poor condition. Thetypical Classroom contains 0 lineal feet of casework. Classrooms are provided adequate chalkboards, markerboards, and tackboards, which arein poor condition. The lockers, located in the Corridors, are adequately provided, and in fair condition. The Art program is equipped with a kiln infair condition, and existing kiln ventilation is adequate. The facility is equipped with wood interior doors that are partially recessed with mostlyproper ADA hardware and clearances, and in fair condition. The Gymnasium space(s) have wood and rubber type flooring, wood and exposedstructure type ceilings, as well as CMU and brick type wall finishes, and they are in fair condition. Gymnasium concrete fixed stands are wood infair condition. Gymnasium basketball backboards are fixed and electrically operated type, and are in good condition. The Media Center, located inthe 1926 Addition, has carpet and VCT type flooring, ACT type ceilings, as well as painted type wall finishes, and they are in good condition.Student Dining, located in the 1929 Addition, has VCT type flooring, exposed type ceilings, as well as painted type wall finishes, and they are inpoor condition. There is no stage. The existing Kitchen is a Warming Kitchen only, is undersized based on current enrollment, and the existingKitchen equipment is in poor condition. The Kitchen hood is in poor condition, and is not equipped with the required UL 300 compliant wetchemical fire suppression system. The required 6’’ overhang on all three exposed sides of the cooking equipment is not provided by the hood.Kitchen hood exhaust ductwork is of proper construction. Walk-in freezer and upright coolers are located within the Kitchen spaces and are in faircondition.


Recommendations: Provide complete replacement of finishes and casework due to installation of systems outlined in Items A, C, D, E, I, K, L, M, N, T, U.




District IT Offices(Upper Level), LockerRoom/Athletic Dept.Stor (Lower Level) (1951)5,948 ft²


Sum Comments

CompleteReplacement ofFinishes andCasework (Middle):


Required Required Required $2,303,193.12(middle, per building area, withremoval of existing)

Toilet Partitions: $1,000.00per stall 30 Required 6 Required $36,000.00(removing and replacing)

Toilet Accessory Replacement


Required Required $24,288.20(per building area)

Art Program Kiln: $2,750.00each 1 Required $2,750.00

Additional Wall Insulation

$6.00sq.ft. (Qty) 35,000 Required

17,856 Required 6,000 Required $353,136.00(includes the furring out of theexisting walls, insulation and abuseresistant GWB)

Total WarmingKitchen Replacement

$112.50sq.ft. (Qty) 1,525 Required $171,562.50(square footage based upon onlyexisting area of food preparation,serving, kitchen storage areas andwalk-ins. Includes demolition andremoval of existing kitchenequipment)

Sum: $2,890,929.82$1,927,110.46 $820,279.52 $143,539.84 $0.00


Typical Classroom Corridor 1926 Building



Facility Assessment

K. Interior Lighting

Description: The classrooms have 2’X 4’ parabolic lay-in or 1 x 4 suspended fluorescent fixtures providing 55 footcandles. The corridors have one lampfluorescent cove lighting providing 24 footcandles. The gymnasium has High Intensity Discharge (HID) lighting providing 25 footcandles. TheStudent Dining and kitchen have surface mounted fluorescent fixtures providing 32-48 footcandles. The office has 2 x 4 lay-in parabolic lightfixtures, providing 45 footcandles. The Mechanical Rooms have 1 x 4 fluorescent with T12 lamps.


Recommendations: Provide new lighting system due to new HVAC system and new fire protection system. Refer to Item J and U.






Sum Comments

Complete BuildingLighting Replacement


Required Required Required Required $836,361.50Includes demo ofexisting fixtures

Sum: $836,361.50 $537,920.50 $251,446.00 $38,662.00 $8,333.00

Gymnasium lighting Corridor lighting



Facility Assessment

L. Security Systems

Description: The security system is comprised of (24) CCTV camera, video storage, and motion sensors. Main Entry has a remote entry. The system is notfully compliant with OSDM guidelines.


Recommendations: Provide upgraded security system. System shall be integrated and include, motion sensors, door contacts, cameras, and digital video storage.Provide site lighting to meet the requirements as outlined in the OSDM.






Sum Comments

Partial SecuritySystem Upgrade:


Required Required Required Required $173,705.85(complete, areaof building)

Exterior Site Lighting:



Sum: $302,376.85 $194,478.95 $90,907.40 $13,977.80 $3,012.70

Camera CCTV monitor



Facility Assessment

M. Emergency/Egress Lighting

Description: The building has dual head emergency egress lighting with battery backup throughout. Exit signs are present and provided with a dedicatedcircuit. Part of 1993 upgrades. Replace egress lighting based on scope of interior renovation work.


Recommendations: Because of the scope of the interior renovations, existing emergency lighting would need replaced.






Sum Comments

Emergency/Egress Lighting:



Sum: $128,671.00 $82,757.00 $38,684.00 $5,948.00 $1,282.00

Emergency lighting Exit light



Facility Assessment

N. Fire Alarm

Description: The building has a zoned fire alarm system with pull stations at all exits. The fire alarm system has duct detectors, and smoke detectors forautomatic initiation. The building does not have strobe lights in all rooms. The system does not provide adequate coverage for the facility.


Recommendations: Provide new fire alarm system with additional strobes, horns, tamper/flow switches to comply with current OBC, NFPA, and OSDM.






Sum Comments

Fire Alarm System:


Required Required Required Required $289,509.75(complete new system,including removal ofexisting)

Sum: $289,509.75 $186,203.25 $87,039.00 $13,383.00 $2,884.50

Fire alarm pull station Main fire alarm panel



Facility Assessment

O. Handicapped Access

Description: At the site, there is an accessible route provided from the public right-of-way, the accessible parking areas, and from the passenger unloadingzone to the main entrance of the school. There is an accessible route connecting all areas of the site. The exterior entrances are not all ADAaccessible due to steps. Access from the parking / drop-off area to the building’s main entry is not compromised by steps or steep ramps. Otherentries are compromised. Adequate handicap parking is provided. Exterior doors are equipped with ADA hardware. The main entry is notequipped with an ADA power assist door. Playground layout and equipping are mostly compliant. On the interior of the building, spaceallowances and reach ranges are mostly compliant. There is an accessible route through the building which does not include protruding objects.Ground and floor surfaces are compliant. Ramps and stairs do not meet all ADA requirements, and are insufficient due to railing and rise.Elevation changes within the overall facility are facilitated by mostly compliant stairwells in poor condition, and non-compliant steps in poorcondition, one compliant chair lift in fair condition, several mostly compliant ramps lifts in fair condition). This multistory building has twonon-compliant elevator that accesses every floor. No Stage is provided. The chain lift accesses the music room in the 1929 addition. There is noelevator in the 1951 building. Most interior doors are partially recessed, are not provided adequate clearances, and are mostly provided withADA-compliant hardware. 15 ADA-compliant toilets are required, and 9 are currently provided. 15 ADA-compliant lavatories are required, and 10are currently provided. 5 ADA-compliant urinals are required, and 0 are currently provided. 3 ADA-compliant showers are required, and 0 arecurrently provided. 15 ADA-compliant electric water coolers are required, and 12 are currently provided. Toilet partitions are metal, and do notprovide appropriate ADA clearances. ADA-compliant accessories are not adequately provided and mounted. Mirrors mostly meet ADArequirements for mounting heights. Health Clinic and Special Education restrooms are not compliant with ADA requirements. ADA signage isprovided on the interior but not on the exterior of the building.


Recommendations: Provide ADA-compliant signage, power assist door opener, elevators, electric water coolers, toilets, sinks, urinals, toilet partitions, toiletaccessories in the overall facility to facilitate the school’s meeting of ADA requirements. Parking issues are corrected in Item P.






Sum Comments

Electric Water Coolers:

$1,800.00unit 2 Required 1 Required $5,400.00(replacement double ADA)

Toilet/Urinals/Sinks: $1,500.00unit 2 Required 4 Required $9,000.00(replacement ADA)

Toilet Partitions: $1,000.00stall 2 Required 4 Required $6,000.00(ADA - grab bars,accessories included)

ADA Assist Door & Frame:

$7,500.00unit 1 Required $7,500.00(openers, electrical,patching, etc)

Provide ADA Shower:

$3,000.00each 2 Required 1 Required $9,000.00(includes fixtures, walls, floordrain, and supply line of anexisting locker room)

Provide Toilet Accessories:

$1,000.00per restroom

2 Required 4 Required $6,000.00

Sum: $42,900.00 $18,100.00 $21,800.00 $3,000.00 $0.00

1929 Building Restrooms Non-ADA Entry



Facility Assessment

P. Site Condition

Description: Marietta Middle School is located in a small town setting on a large sized parcel. Access is via a series of drives off the public road west of thesite. There is not adequately defined separation of bus & other vehicular or pedestrian traffic. Additionally, information obtained from staff on siteindicates that there are a large number of buses serving the school and somewhat adequate room for stacking during drop-off. Buses cannot exitusing the drive past the track because they are too wide and too heavy to proceed down the hill. Parking is adequate in number. Visitor parking isnot defined as separate from staff parking. An adequate number of ADA spaces are provided but are not properly striped and signed, and areremote from the building entrance. The majority of the paving is in adequate condition as is most of the site sidewalk. There is only a single areacontaining curb on site, and it appears to be new. Concrete ramps do not meet ADA slope requirements. Dumpster pads are available, but arecracked. Sidewalk around the building entrances is in moderately good shape, but stairs are often damaged, and some of the sidewalk is spallingor cracked. The site has catch basins removing rainwater, but multiple are full of mud or stone.


Recommendations: Pavement should be milled and overlaid, and in the area of the bus drop off potentially repaired to its full depth. It should be at least a heavy dutyoverlay. Concrete ramps should be removed and replaced to be ADA compliant, including lower slopes and detectable warnings. Sidewalk shouldbe replaced to remove cracks and to reduce the risk of a trip hazard. Stairs should be removed and replaced if cracked. Catch basins should becleaned out and jetted.






Sum Comments

Replace Existing AsphaltPaving (light duty):

$28.60sq. yard 84 Required 39 Required 6 Required 1 Required $3,718.00(including drainage / tearout for light duty asphalt)

Asphalt Paving / NewWearing Course:

$19.00sq. yard 7,629 Required

3,566 Required 548 Required 118 Required $225,359.00(includes minor crack repairin less than 5% of pavedarea)

Concrete Sidewalk: $5.00sq.ft. (Qty)

1,364 Required

638 Required 98 Required 21 Required $10,605.00(5 inch exterior slab)

Exterior Hand / Guard Rails:

$43.00ln.ft. 331 Required 155 Required 24 Required 5 Required $22,145.00

Replace Concrete Steps: $32.00sq.ft. (Qty)

282 Required 132 Required 20 Required 4 Required $14,016.00

Provide ConcreteDumpster Pad:

$2,400.00each 1 Required $2,400.00(for two dumpsters)

Base Sitework Allowancefor Unforeseen Circumstances

$50,000.00allowance Required $50,000.00Include this and one of thenext two. (Applies for wholebuilding, so only oneaddition should have thisitem)

Sitework Allowance forUnforeseenCircumstances forbuildings 100,000 SF or larger

$150,000.00allowance Required $150,000.00Include this one or theprevious. (Applies for wholebuilding, so only oneaddition should have thisitem)

Other: Concrete Pavement

$70.00sq. yard 216 Required 101 Required 16 Required 3 Required $23,520.00Reinforced concretepavement

Other: Parking wheel stops

$135.00each 4 Required 2 Required $810.00Concrete wheel stop

Other: Pavement Milling $21.00sq. yard 7,629 Required

3,566 Required 548 Required 118 Required $249,081.00Pavement milling andremoval

Other: Provide detectable warnings

$500.00each 1 Required 1 Required $1,000.00ADA detectable warning

Other: Site ADA Ramps $1,000.00each 1 Required 1 Required $2,000.00ADA Ramp

Sum: $754,654.00 $557,199.40 $166,674.40 $25,373.60 $5,406.60


Facility Assessment

Q. Sewage System

Description: The sanitary sewer drains to a municipal system with no reported problems and is in good condition.


Recommendations: No work required.






SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Sanitary



Facility Assessment

R. Water Supply

Description: The water supply comes from a municipal system, which provides adequate pressure and capacity for the needs of the school. The system wasupgraded in 1993 with a new service entrance.


Recommendations: No work required.






SumComments

Sum: $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Water supply



Facility Assessment

S. Exterior Doors

Description: Typical exterior doors in the overall facility are aluminum type construction, installed on aluminum frames, and in fair condition. Typical exteriordoors feature insulated tempered glass vision panels. Entrance doors in the overall facility are aluminum type construction, installed on aluminumframes, and in fair condition. Entrance doors feature insulated tempered glass vision panels. There are no overhead doors in the facility.


Recommendations: Replace or identify which 8 leaves exterior doors, due to poor condition.




District IT Offices (Upper Level), LockerRoom/Athletic Dept. Stor (Lower Level) (1951)5,948 ft²


Sum Comments

Door Leaf/Frameand Hardware:

$2,500.00per leaf

8 Required $20,000.00(includesremoval ofexisting)

Sum: $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Stair Tower Egress Doors Typical Exterior Doors



Facility Assessment

T. Hazardous Material

Description: The School District provided the AHERA three year reinspection reports, prepared by ASTAR, and dated October 2017, documenting known andassumed locations of asbestos and other hazardous materials.


Recommendations: Remove all hazardous materials, inclusive of asbestos-containing materials in the overall facility, as noted in the attached Environmental HazardsAssessment.






Sum Comments

Environmental

Hazards Form

EHA Form —

Resilient FlooringRemoval, Including Mastic

$3.00sq.ft. (Qty)

5,500 Required $16,500.00See J

Other: EEACalculation Correction

$344,823.90lump sum

Required $344,823.90Gandee 2008 EEA$361,232.90 - $16,500 =$344,823.9 correction

Sum: $361,323.90 $361,323.90 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00



Facility Assessment

U. Life Safety

Description: The overall facility does not contain a compliant automated fire suppression system. The stairwells are enclosed. The handrails do not meetrequirements. The kitchen hood is not equipped with a suppression system but the kitchen does not have any food preparation (warming only).The facility is not equipped with an emergency generator.


Recommendations: Provide automated fire suppression system throughout the facility to meet OSDM guidelines and handrails. Retrofit existing kitchen hood with firesuppression. Provide handrail replacement. Provide exterior stair enclosure. Provide a new emergency generator with funding provided viacomplete replacement of electrical system in Item D.






Sum Comments

Sprinkler / FireSuppression System:

$3.20sq.ft. (Qty)

82,757 Required

38,684 Required 5,948 Required 1,282 Required $411,747.20(includes increase ofservice piping, ifrequired)

New Exterior Stair Enclosure

$42,500.00per level

1 Required $42,500.00(all inclusive)

Water Main $50.00ln.ft. 400 Required 0 Required 0 Required 0 Required $20,000.00(new)

Handrails: $5,000.00level 3 Required 2 Required 2 Required $35,000.00

Sum: $509,247.20 $299,822.40 $133,788.80 $71,533.60 $4,102.40

Kitchen hood Limited Area sprinkler double check valve



Facility Assessment

V. Loose Furnishings

Description: The typical Classroom furniture is mismatched, and in generally poor condition, consisting of student desks & chairs, teacher desks & chairs,desk height file cabinets, bookcases, wastebaskets. The facility’s furniture and loose equipment were evaluated in item 6.17 in the CEFPI sectionof this report, and on a scale of 1 to 10 the overall facility received a rating of 3 due to observed conditions, and due to the fact that it lacks someof the Design Manual required elements.


Recommendations: Provide for replacement of outdated or inadequate furniture.




District IT Offices (Upper Level), LockerRoom/Athletic Dept. Stor (Lower Level) (1951)5,948 ft²


Sum Comments

CEFPIRating 0 to 3


Required Required Required $828,028.50

Sum: $828,028.50 $537,920.50 $251,446.00 $38,662.00 $0.00

Media Center Typical Classroom



Facility Assessment

W. Technology

Description: The building is not compliant with OSDM guidelines for Technology.


Recommendations: Provide funding to Upgrade technology system to current OSDM standards.






Sum Comments

MS portion of buildingwith total SF < 67,950

$11.00sq.ft. (Qty)

67,950 Required 0 Required 0 Required 0 Required $747,450.00

MS portion of buildingwith total SF 67,951 to 91,650

$10.00sq.ft. (Qty)

15,000 Required 10,000 Required 0 Required 0 Required $250,000.00

MS portion of buildingwith total SF > 100,000

$9.00sq.ft. (Qty)

28,684 Required 5,948 Required 1,282 Required $323,226.00

Sum: $1,320,676.00$897,450.00 $358,156.00 $53,532.00 $11,538.00

Computer Center at Media Center Main Network Rack at Office Area



Facility Assessment

X. Construction Contingency / Non-Construction Cost

Renovation Costs (A-W) $17,791,379.65

7.00% Construction Contingency $1,245,396.58

Subtotal $19,036,776.23

16.29% Non-Construction Costs $3,101,090.85

Total Project $22,137,867.07

Construction Contingency $1,245,396.58

Non-Construction Costs $3,101,090.85

Total for X. $4,346,487.42

Non-Construction Costs Breakdown

Land Survey 0.03% $5,711.03

Soil Borings / Phase I Envir. Report 0.10% $19,036.78

Agency Approval Fees (Bldg. Code) 0.25% $47,591.94

Construction Testing 0.40% $76,147.10

Printing - Bid Documents 0.15% $28,555.16

Advertising for Bids 0.02% $3,807.36

Builder’s Risk Insurance 0.12% $22,844.13

Design Professional’s Compensation 7.50% $1,427,758.22

CM Compensation 6.00% $1,142,206.57

Commissioning 0.60% $114,220.66

Non-Construction Contingency (includes partnering and mediation services) 1.12% $213,211.89

Total Non-Construction Costs 16.29% $3,101,090.85



School Facility Appraisal

Name of Appraiser Jeff Tuckerman Date of Appraisal 2017-10-25

Building Name Marietta Middle School

Street Address 242 Seventh St.

City/Town, State, Zip Code Marietta, OH 45750

Telephone Number(s) 740-374-6530

School District Marietta City SD

Setting: Small City

Site-Acreage 27.00 Building Square Footage 128,671

Grades Housed 6-8 Student Capacity 918

Number of Teaching Stations 36 Number of Floors 3

Student Enrollment 630

Dates of Construction 1926,1929,1951,1991

Energy Sources: Fuel Oil Gas Electric Solar

Air Conditioning: Roof Top Windows Units Central Room Units

Heating: Central Roof Top Individual Unit Forced Air

Hot Water Steam

Type of Construction

Load bearing masonry

Steel frame

Concrete frame

Wood

Steel Joists

Exterior Surfacing

Brick

Stucco

Metal

Wood

Stone

Floor Construction

Wood Joists

Steel Joists

Slab on grade

Structural slab


Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:19School Facility Appraisal

Suitability Appraisal of 1.0 The School Site for Marietta_Middle_School_2008_EEA_02_15_19_Update

Bottom of page

Suitability Appraisal of 1.0 The School Site for Marietta_Middle_School_2008_EEA_02_15_19_Update

1.0 The School Site Points Allocated Points

1.1 Site is large enough to meet educational needs as defined by state and local requirements 25 25

The Ohio School Facilities Commission Ohio School Design Manual requires the site to be 26.3 acres. The site has 27 acres.

1.2 Site is easily accessible and conveniently located for the present and future population 20 15

The site is accessible from collector, city, or arterial roads that are suitable for buses, cars, and service vehicles. Two entry points into the site are provided, with some

separation of car and bus traffic. Building site is on top of a hill.

1.3 Location is removed from undesirable business, industry, traffic, and natural hazards 10 8

Surrounding site uses include commercial but is at top of a hill.

1.4 Site is well landscaped and developed to meet educational needs 10 6

All areas of the site are seeded. The lawn areas where mowing is required do not exceed 3:1 slope. There are not large species of deciduous trees and smaller,

ornamental canopy trees for shade of the building, parking lots, and playground areas. There are not evergreen trees and shrubs that act as a wind screen for building and

site. There is not a visual screen of service areas and adjacent properties. Low maintenance shrubs and flowering trees do not emphasize the building entrance. The sides of

the hills are covered in trees and vegetation.

1.5 ES Well equipped playgrounds are separated from streets and parking areasMS Well equipped athletic and intermural areas are separated from streets and parkingHS Well equipped athletic areas are adequate with sufficient solid-surface parking

10 5

Access is through parking and drive lanes. The physical education fields do not include a softball field but have a multipurpose field. There is a paved area for full or half

court basketball. There is a small grouping of table and benches, which can serve as an outdoor Classroom. There is not (an area provided for) baseball field, but there is a

running track/football field and tennis courts at street level.

1.6 Topography is varied enough to provide desirable appearance and without steep inclines 5 2

A level area is provided to accommodate buildings and some perimeter walks, some vehicular circulation, mechanical/service yard, some parking areas, outdoor student

playgrounds, and physical education areas. There is a sufficient slope across the site to allow for positive drainage to a storm sewer outlet or other discharge point. There are

significant changes in topography from street level to the school site.

1.7 Site has stable, well drained soil free of erosion 5 4

There are no signs of erosion or ponding on the site.

1.8 Site is suitable for special instructional needs, e.g., outdoor learning 5 3

The site is semi-suitable for special instructional needs with areas equipped with tables and seating suitable for outdoor learning. There are fixed benches and enclosed

trash receptacles along walks to the main building entrance.

1.9 Pedestrian services include adequate sidewalk with designated crosswalks, curb cuts, and correct slopes 5 2

Walks are not between 8-12 feet wide, around the perimeter of the building, and cannot serve as emergency vehicular access. Bus loading and unloading area is on the

playground. Minor connecting walks are a minimum of 5 feet wide. All walks are sloped between 1% and 1:20. There is a walk connecting the school to the public sidewalk,

but it is steep with many steps. Curb ramps are provided at the bus and vehicular loading areas, and along the accessible route.

1.10 ES/MS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking for faculty and staff is providedHS Sufficient on-site, solid surface parking is provided for faculty, students, staff and community

5 3

Parking is required for a staff of 58 and 10 visitors. There are 77 spaces provided. Sufficient on-site solid surface parking for faculty and staff is provided, but layout and

separation is not ideal.

TOTAL - 1.0 The School Site 100 73

Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:19Suitability Appraisal of 1.0 The School Site for Marietta_Middle_School_2008_EEA_02_15_19_Update

Suitability Appraisal of 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features for Marietta_Middle_School_2008_EEA_02_15_19_Update

Bottom of page

Suitability Appraisal of 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features for Marietta_Middle_School_2008_EEA_02_15_19_Update

2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features Points Allocated Points

Structural

2.1 Structure meets all barrier-free requirements both externally and internally 15 6

At the site, there is an accessible route provided from the public right-of-way, the accessible parking areas, and from the passenger unloading zone, to the main

entrance of the school. An accessible route does not connect every area of the site. The entrance is in the accessible route, and is non-compliant. On the interior of the

building, space allowance and reach ranges are non-compliant. There is no accessible route that does not have protruding objects. Ground and floor surfaces are mostly

compliant. Ramps and stairs do not meet all ADA requirements. The elevator does not comply with all requirements. The facility contains 2 elevators. Interior doors and

hardware are mostly compliant. Drinking fountains, water closets, urinals, showers, toilet partitions, mirrors, and lavatories are provided, and are mostly non-compliant. Some

restrooms have an appropriate amount of clearance. Handrails and grab bars are not ADA compliant. ADA compliant alarms and strobes are provided. Signage is ADA

compliant, but inadequate. Fixed and built-in seating is non-compliant for the ages of the students. The assembly area is semi-accessible and compliant.

2.2 Roofs appear sound, have positive drainage, and are weather tight 15 7

The roof over the facility is a spray-on foam and asphalt shingles. The roof is in poor condition. Gutters, downspouts and roof drains are in poor condition.

2.3 Foundations are strong and stable with no observable cracks 10 6

The foundation appears in decent condition for its age but there are cracking, movement, and water proofing remediation.

2.4 Exterior and interior walls have sufficient expansion joints and are free of deterioration 10 7

There are some signs of deterioration in the masonry walls. Exterior and interior walls have sufficient expansion joints.

2.5 Entrances and exits are located so as to permit efficient student traffic flow 10 7

The entrance is located off a long walk from the vehicular loading area and the bus loading area. The School Offices are near the main entrance.

2.6 Building ’’envelope’’ generally provides for energy conservation (see criteria) 10 7

Many windows have insulated glazing, but not all the roof is insulated.

2.7 Structure is free of friable asbestos and toxic materials 10 9

See asbestos report.

2.8 Interior walls permit sufficient flexibility for a variety of class sizes 10 6

The interior walls are fixed masonry or partition walls and do not permit flexibility for a variety of class sizes.

Mechanical/Electrical Points Allocated Points

2.9 Adequate light sources are well maintained, and properly placed and are not subject to overheating 15 11

The lighting system does not provide the minimum lighting intensity in all areas of the building, as require by the OFCC. All classrooms do not have dual-level lighting

systems. Lighting systems are well maintained.

2.10 Internal water supply is adequate with sufficient pressure to meet health and safety requirements 15 12

The water supplied by a municipal utility and is adequate in both quality and pressure, but would need studied for new sprinkler system.

2.11 Each teaching/learning area has adequate convenient wall outlets, phone and computer cabling for technology applications

15 5

Wall outlets are not adequate. Phone and data cabling is not adequate.

2.12 Electrical controls are safely protected with disconnect switches easily accessible 10 8

Electrical panels in the Corridors are locked. Panels are not easy to find.

2.13 Drinking fountains are adequate in number and placement, and are properly maintained including provisions for the disabled

10 9

There is a sufficient quantity of drinking fountains. They are spread out, throughout the building. There are an adequate number of ADA compliant fountains.

Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:19Suitability Appraisal of 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features for Marietta_Middle_School_2008_EEA_02_15_19_Update

2.14 Number and size of restrooms meet requirements 10 7

There are enough Restrooms, as required by the OBC and the ADAG, but are not all accessible.

2.15 Drainage systems are properly maintained and meet requirements 10 7

The gutters and downspouts are in fair condition, and are properly located. The roof drains are adequate in number and placement. There are some floor drains in the

Restrooms and the Mechanical Rooms. There are yard drains in low areas of the site. The parking lot has an adequate amount of drains.

2.16 Fire alarms, smoke detectors, and sprinkler systems are properly maintained and meet requirements 10 2

The building does not have a sprinkler system. The fire alarm devises are maintained, but the system does not meet current design requirements.

2.17 Intercommunication system consists of a central unit that allows dependable two-way communication between theoffice and instructional areas

10 9

A two-way communication system between office and classrooms is present via push button speaker system.

2.18 Exterior water supply is sufficient and available for normal usage 5 4

Hose bibs are not provided on most sides of the building.

TOTAL - 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features 200 129

Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:19Suitability Appraisal of 2.0 Structural and Mechanical Features for Marietta_Middle_School_2008_EEA_02_15_19_Update

Suitability Appraisal of 3.0 Plant Maintainability for Marietta_Middle_School_2008_EEA_02_15_19_Update

Bottom of page

Suitability Appraisal of 3.0 Plant Maintainability for Marietta_Middle_School_2008_EEA_02_15_19_Update

3.0 Plant Maintainability Points Allocated Points

3.1 Windows, doors, and walls are of material and finish requiring minimum maintenance 15 11

Windows, doors, and walls are of materials and finish requiring average maintenance. Most windows are double pane insulated glazing in aluminum clad frames. Some

are single glazed, metal framed. Exterior doors and frames are mostly aluminum. Some exterior doors and frames are painted hollow metal. Interior doors are mostly a wood

on steel or wood frames. Some doors are not louvered. A few interior doors and frames are painted hollow metal. Exterior walls are brick. Interior walls are painted or glazed

masonry and plaster. A few interior walls are painted gypsum on wood studs.

3.2 Floor surfaces throughout the building require minimum care 15 10

Floor surfaces throughout the building require average care. Asbestos containing floor tiles require special maintenance to control airborne fibres that may be released

during scrubbing and waxing operations. Floors in the Classrooms are carpet and VCT. Floors in the Corridors are terrazzo and VCT. Floors in the Restrooms are ceramic

tile. Floors in the Student Dining Area are VCT. Floors in the Kitchen are VCT. Floors in the Gymnasium(s) are wood. Floors in the Stairwells are mostly rubber treads and

VCT landings.

3.3 Ceilings and walls throughout the building, including service areas, are easily cleaned and resistant to stain 10 7

Ceilings are ACT and plaster. Ceilings are not easily cleaned or stain resistant.

3.4 Built-in equipment is designed and constructed for ease of maintenance 10 4

Built-in equipment is original and does not meet current standards. Casework is mostly wood. Tops are plastic laminate. Classrooms have minimal casework.

3.5 Finishes and hardware, with compatible keying system, are of durable quality 10 7

Door hardware has a compatible keying system. Exterior door hardware is not ADAG complaint. Interior door hardware is mostly ADAG compliant.

3.6 Restroom fixtures are wall mounted and of quality finish 10 7

Restroom fixtures are a mixture of floor mounted and wall mounted and of a quality finish.

3.7 Adequate custodial storage space with water and drain is accessible throughout the building 10 8

There are Custodial Spaces available in all areas of the building with water and drain.

3.8 Adequate electrical outlets and power, to permit routine cleaning, are available in every area 10 6

Corridors do not have an adequate number of outlets. Classrooms do not have an adequate number of outlets.

3.9 Outdoor light fixtures, electrical outlets, equipment, and other fixtures are accessible for repair and replacement 10 6

Light fixtures and outlets are on all sides of the building and at every door and are mostly accessible, but old and require replacement.

TOTAL - 3.0 Plant Maintainability 100 66

Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:19Suitability Appraisal of 3.0 Plant Maintainability for Marietta_Middle_School_2008_EEA_02_15_19_Update

Suitability Appraisal of 4.0 Building Safety and Security for Marietta_Middle_School_2008_EEA_02_15_19_Update

Bottom of page

Suitability Appraisal of 4.0 Building Safety and Security for Marietta_Middle_School_2008_EEA_02_15_19_Update

4.0 Building Safety and Security Points Allocated Points

Site Safety

4.1 Student loading areas are segregated from other vehicular traffic and pedestrian walkways 15 10

Student loading areas are not segregated from pedestrian walkways. Vehicular traffic does occur in the bus loading area. Loading occurs at the paved playground.

4.2 Walkways, both on and offsite, are available for safety of pedestrians 10 6

There are sidewalks provided in the public right of way, along the main road. Access is provided from the public sidewalk to the building entrance. Street level is well

below the site.

4.3 Access streets have sufficient signals and signs to permit safe entrance to and exit from school area 5 3

There is signage but no signals provided.

4.4 Vehicular entrances and exits permit safe traffic flow 5 3

See 1.2

4.5 ES Playground equipment is free from hazardMS Location and types of intramural equipment are free from hazardHS Athletic field equipment is properly located and is free from hazard

5 4

MS/Intramural areas have appropriate slopes and fencing. See 1.5 for a listing of athletic facilities.

Building Safety Points Allocated Points

4.6 The heating unit(s) is located away from student occupied areas 20 10

The building has unit ventilators and cabinet heaters in many Classroom areas.

4.7 Multi-story buildings have at least two stairways for student egress 15 12

Multi-story building have at least 2 enclosed stairways that are mostly ADA and OBC compliant.

4.8 Exterior doors open outward and are equipped with panic hardware 10 8

Exterior doors open outward, and are equipped with functional panic hardware that is ADA compliant, but older.

4.9 Emergency lighting is provided throughout the entire building with exit signs on separate electrical circuits 10 8

Emergency lighting is provided. Lights are battery or generator powered. There are an appropriate amount of exit signs.

4.10 Classroom doors are recessed and open outward 10 5

Most Classroom doors are recessed without appropriate door clearances, as required by the ADAG. The doors do protrude into the Corridor by more than 8 inches, but

corridors are wider than required.

4.11 Building security systems are provided to assure uninterrupted operation of the educational program 10 7

The building security system includes door contacts and motion sensors, which are located at the exterior doors. Rooms with 6 or more computers do not have motion

sensors. There is a visitor control system provided.

4.12 Flooring (including ramps and stairways) is maintained in a non-slip condition 5 4

Flooring is maintained in a non-slip condition. See 3.2 for a list of floor finishes. Stairways have rubber treads.

4.13 Stair risers (interior and exterior) do not exceed 6 1/2 inches and range in number from 3 - 16 5 4

Most stair risers do not exceed the 7 inches permitted by the OBC.

4.14 Glass is properly located and protected with wire or safety material to prevent accidental student injury 5 4

Glass in the exterior door systems is tempered. Glass in the interior door systems is tempered. Interior glass wall panels are tempered. Some interior wire glass does

not meet code.

Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:19Suitability Appraisal of 4.0 Building Safety and Security for Marietta_Middle_School_2008_EEA_02_15_19_Update

4.15 Fixed Projections in the traffic areas do not extend more than eight inches from the corridor wall 5 4

Fixed projections in the Corridor do not exceed 8 inches. Fixed projections in the accessible route do not exceed 4 inches.

4.16 Traffic areas terminate at an exit or a stairway leading to an egress 5 2

There are dead-end Corridors in the building. All Corridors do not terminate at exits or stairways leading to exits. Stairways empty to the exterior, or adjacent to a

Corridor leading to the exterior. Stairways are enclosed.

Emergency Safety Points Allocated Points

4.17 Adequate fire safety equipment is properly located 15 13

The travel distance from any location to a 20# type ABC fire extinguisher is 50 feet or less, in the Corridors. The travel distance from any location to a 10# type ABC

fire extinguisher is 30 feet or less.

4.18 There are at least two independent exits from any point in the building 15 12

There are dead-end Corridors in the building. There are several exits to the outside, provided from the Corridors. Classrooms have door or window egress, as

recommended in the Life Safety Code.

4.19 Fire-resistant materials are used throughout the structure 15 12

The structure is a masonry load bearing system with steel joist and concrete deck. Interior walls are masonry. Finishes comply with OBC requirements.

4.20 Automatic and manual emergency alarm system with a distinctive sound and flashing light is provided 15 13

There is an automatic and manual emergency alarm system provided. The system has an audible alarm and strobes.

TOTAL - 4.0 Building Safety and Security 200 144

Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:19Suitability Appraisal of 4.0 Building Safety and Security for Marietta_Middle_School_2008_EEA_02_15_19_Update

Suitability Appraisal of 5.0 Educational Adequacy for Marietta_Middle_School_2008_EEA_02_15_19_Update

Bottom of page

Suitability Appraisal of 5.0 Educational Adequacy for Marietta_Middle_School_2008_EEA_02_15_19_Update

5.0 Educational Adequacy Points Allocated Points

Academic Learning Space

5.1 Size of academic learning areas meets desirable standards 25 17

The typical classroom is 600-750 SF. The OFCC recommends 900 SF.

5.2 Classroom space permits arrangements for small group activity 15 8

The Classrooms are not large enough to permit arrangements for small group activities.

5.3 Location of academic learning areas is near related educational activities and away from disruptive noise 10 7

Academic areas are arranged so that children of the same age are grouped together by floor. The Media Center is centrally located to the Academic Areas on the

second floor. The Physical Education and Student Dining Areas are away from the academic core.

5.4 Personal space in the classroom away from group instruction allows privacy time for individual students 10 7

There is little space for individual instruction.

5.5 Storage for student materials is adequate 10 7

There are lockers in the Corridors, adjacent to the Academic Areas. There are areas for student storage in the Classrooms at desks. Storage for student materials is

not adequate.

5.6 Storage for teacher materials is adequate 10 4

There are some horizontal files, vertical files and bookshelves for the teachers. Storage for teacher materials is adequate.

Special Learning Space Points Allocated Points

5.7 Size of special learning area(s) meets standards 15 10

The Special Learning Area is 600 SF. The OFCC recommends 900 SF.

5.8 Design of specialized learning area(s) is compatible with instructional need 10 6

There is a Self-Contained Classroom provided. Support spaces include a Workroom, and a Restroom.

5.9 Library/Resource/Media Center provides appropriate and attractive space 10 10

The Media Center is 3,769 SF.

5.10 Gymnasium (or covered P.E. area) adequately serves physical education instruction 5 5

The Gymnasium is 10,500 SF. The OFCC recommends a minimum of 3,500 to 5,000 SF.

5.11 ES Pre-kindergarten and kindergarten space is appropriate for age of students and nature of instructionMS/HS Science program is provided sufficient space and equipment

10 5

MS/The Science Rooms are undersized. The OFCC recommends 1,200 SF. The Science Rooms are not 1,200 SF.

5.12 Music Program is provided adequate sound treated space 5 3

There are not acoustical panels on the walls of the Band Room and Choir Room. Ceilings are ACT. The Music program is not provided adequate sound treated space.

5.13 Space for art is appropriate for special instruction, supplies, and equipment 5 4

The Art Room is 1,558 SF. The OFCC recommends 1,200 SF. Space for the Art Program is appropriate for special instruction, is well stocked with supplies, and is well

equipped.

School Facility Appraisal Points Allocated Points

5.14 Space for technology education permits use of state-of-the-art equipment 5 3

Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:19Suitability Appraisal of 5.0 Educational Adequacy for Marietta_Middle_School_2008_EEA_02_15_19_Update

The Computer Lab is 780 SF. The OFCC recommends 1,000 SF. Space for the Technology Education Program permits use of state-of-the-art equipment.

5.15 Space for small groups and remedial instruction is provided adjacent to classrooms 5 2

There is little space for small group or remedial instruction provided. Teachers and volunteers use some smaller rooms away from classrooms.

5.16 Storage for student and teacher material is adequate 5 2

Storage for student and teacher materials is not adequate.

Support Space Points Allocated Points

5.17 Teacher’s lounge and work areas reflect teachers as professionals 10 5

The Teacher’s Lounge is 270 SF. The OFCC recommends a minimum of 450-900 SF for 8-24 staff. The area is undersized and furnished poorly.

5.18 Cafeteria/Kitchen is attractive with sufficient space for seating/dining, delivery, storage, and food preparation 10 7

The Student Dining/Kitchen Area are 5,057 SF and 1,525 SF respectively. The OFCC recommends a minimum of 1/3 of the building capacity X 15 SF or 3,000 SF.

The student dining is in the basement with sufficient room for seating, dining, delivery, storage, and food preparation. The Kitchen is a warming kitchen.

5.19 Administrative offices provided are consistent in appearance and function with the maturity of the students served 5 4

The Offices are satisfactory for the age of the students being served.

5.20 Counselor’s office insures privacy and sufficient storage 5 4

The Counselor’s Office is 100 SF. The OFCC requires 120 SF with an additional 100 SF for Storage and 200 SF for Conference. It is located near the Reception Area

and the Secretarial Area.

5.21 Clinic is near administrative offices and is equipped to meet requirements 5 4

The Clinic is 300 SF. The OFCC recommends a minimum of 300 SF. It is located near the Reception Area. The Clinic is not organized to meet requirements.

5.22 Suitable reception space is available for students, teachers, and visitors 5 4

The Reception Area is about 250 SF and is available for students, teachers, and visitors. The OFCC recommends a minimum of 200-400 SF. No secure entry other

than buzzing in from outside.

5.23 Administrative personnel are provided sufficient work space and privacy 5 4

There is about 1,500 SF provided for the principal, assistant principal, secretary, Conference Room, Storage, Copy Room, in the school suspension, parent/volunteer

office, itinerate, career center and Restroom. The OFCC recommends around 2,600 SF. The area provides administrative personnel sufficient work space and privacy.

TOTAL - 5.0 Educational Adequacy 200 132

Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:19Suitability Appraisal of 5.0 Educational Adequacy for Marietta_Middle_School_2008_EEA_02_15_19_Update

Suitability Appraisal of 6.0 Environment for Education for Marietta_Middle_School_2008_EEA_02_15_19_Update

Bottom of page

Suitability Appraisal of 6.0 Environment for Education for Marietta_Middle_School_2008_EEA_02_15_19_Update

6.0 Environment for Education Points Allocated Points

Exterior Environment

6.1 Overall design is aesthetically pleasing to age of students 15 12

The building is a traditional design, with classical detailing. The building is one color and texture of brick. The overall design is aesthetically pleasing to the age of

students being served.

6.2 Site and building are well landscaped 10 6

See 1.4

6.3 Exterior noise and poor environment do not disrupt learning 10 8

Exterior noise and a poor environment do not disrupt learning. Exterior noise is limited to traffic noise. See item 1.3 for a listing of surrounding site usage.

6.4 Entrances and walkways are sheltered from sun and inclement weather 10 5

The main building entrance is not sheltered. Exits are not sheltered. On-site walkways to accessory buildings are not covered.

6.5 Building materials provide attractive color and texture 5 4

The exterior surface of the building is one color and texture of brick. Building materials do provide attractive color and texture to the age of students being served.

Interior Environment Points Allocated Points

6.6 Color schemes, building materials, and decor provide an impetus to learning 20 10

There are warm base colors on the walls (good). There are lighter shades of blue and green in classroom and in the media center (good). School colors are used in the

athletic areas (good). Carpeting is multicolored and dark (good). Grout color for floor tile is a tinted shade (good).

6.7 Year around comfortable temperature and humidity are provided throughout the building 15 6

The building does not have a central air conditioning system. The facility contains split system air conditioning units in isolated areas.

6.8 Ventilating system provides adequate quiet circulation of clean air and meets 15cfm VBC requirement 15 11

It does not consistently provide the minimum 15 cfm ventilation at the unit ventilators as required by the OBCMC.

6.9 Lighting system provides proper intensity, diffusion, and distribution of illumination 15 10

See 2.9.

6.10 Drinking fountains and restroom facilities are conveniently located 15 13

Drinking fountains and Restrooms are located throughout the building, per floor.

6.11 Communication among students is enhanced by commons area(s) for socialization 10 8

There are areas for students to gather in the Student Dining Area, Gymnasium. There is a gathering area at the entrance to the school.

6.12 Traffic flow is aided by appropriate foyers and corridors 10 7

The Foyers and Corridors do not all provide an ADA accessible route.

6.13 Areas for students to interact are suitable to the age group 10 8

Areas for students to interact are suitable to the age group.

6.14 Large group areas are designed for effective management of students 10 8

There is a PA system provided, with jacks at each end of the gathering area.

6.15 Acoustical treatment of ceilings, walls, and floors provides effective sound control 10 8

Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:19Suitability Appraisal of 6.0 Environment for Education for Marietta_Middle_School_2008_EEA_02_15_19_Update

Acoustical treatment of ceilings, walls, and floors does mostly provide effective sound control. Classroom floors are mostly VCT. Ceilings are ACT or plaster. The

acoustical treatment in the Classrooms is adequate. The acoustical treatment in the Student Dining Area is adequate. The acoustical treatment in the Media Center is

adequate. The acoustical treatment in the Corridors is adequate. The acoustical treatment in the Music Room is not adequate. The acoustical treatment in the Gymnasium is

adequate.

6.16 Window design contributes to a pleasant environment 10 8

Windows are aluminum clad frame with insulated glazing and do contribute to a pleasant learning environment.

6.17 Furniture and equipment provide a pleasing atmosphere 10 3

There are tables, desks, and chairs provided for students. There are desk, vertical files, lateral files, and bookshelves provided for teachers that do not meet OFCC

requirements. There are high density stall chairs and folding cafeteria tables provided that meet OSDM requirements. All furniture is not ADA compliant.

TOTAL - 6.0 Environment for Education 200 135

Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:19Suitability Appraisal of 6.0 Environment for Education for Marietta_Middle_School_2008_EEA_02_15_19_Update

LEED Observation NotesSchool District: Marietta City SD

County: Washington

School District IRN: 44321

Building: Marietta Middle School

Building IRN: 22780

Sustainable Sites

Construction process can have a harmful effect on local ecology, especially when buildings are build on productive agricultural, wildlife or open areas. Several measures can be

take however to prevent the impact on undeveloped lands or to improve previously contaminated sites. Appropriate location reduces the need for private transportation and helps

to prevent an increase in air pollution. Developing buildings in urban areas and on brownfield sites instead of greenfield locations has economical and environmental benefits.

Controlling stormwater runoff and erosion can prevent the worsening of water quality in receiving bodies of water and the impact on aquatic life. Once the building is constructed,

it’s important to decrease heat island effects and reduce the light pollution on the site.

(source: LEED Reference Guide, 2001:9)

Water Efficiency

In the US ca. 340 billion gallons of fresh water are withdrawn daily from surface sources, 65% of which is discharged later after use. Water is also withdrawn from underground

aquifers The excessive usage of water results in the current water deficit, estimated at 3,700 billion gallons. Water efficiency measures in commercial buildings can reduce water

usage by at least 30%. Low-flow fixtures, sensors or using non potable water for landscape irrigation, toilet flushing and building systems are just some of available strategies. Not

only do they result in environmental savings, but also bring about financial benefits, related to lower water use fees, lower sewage volumes to treat and energy use reductions.


Energy & Atmosphere

Buildings in the US account for more than 30% of the total energy use and for approximately 60% of electricity. 75% of energy is derived from the burning of fossil fuels, which

releases CO2 into the Atmosphere and contributes to global warming. Moreover, coal fired electric utilities release nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide, where the former contribute

to smog and the latter to acid rain. Other types of energy production are not less harmful. Burning of natural gas produces nitrogen oxides and greenhouse gases as well, nuclear

power creates nuclear wastes, while hydroelectric generating plants disrupt natural water flows. Luckily there are several practices that can reduce energy consumption and are

environmentally and economically beneficial. Not only will they reduce the air pollution and mitigate global warming thanks to being less dependent on power plants, but also they

will reduce operational costs and will quickly pay back. In order to make the most of those practices, it’s important to adopt a holistic approach to the building’s energy load and

integrate different energy saving strategies.


Material & Resources

The steps related to process building materials, such as extraction, processing and transportation are not environmentally natural, as they pollute the air, water and use natural

resources. Construction and demolition wastes account for 40% of the solid waste stream in the US. Reusing existing documents is one of the best strategies to reduce solid

wastes volumes and prevents then from ending up at landfills. It also reduces habitat disturbance and minimizes the need for the surrounding infrastructure. While using new

materials one should take into account different material sources. Salvaged materials provide savings on material costs, recycled content material minimizes waste products and

local materials reduce the environmental impact of transportation. Finally, using rapidly renewable materials and certified wood decreases the consumption of natural resources.

Recycling and reusing construction waste is another strategy to be taken into consideration in sustainable design.


Indoor Environmental Quality

As we spend a big majority of our time indoors, the emphasis should be put on optimal indoor environmental quality strategies while (re)designing a building . Otherwise, a poor

IEQ will have adverse effects on occupants’ health, productivity and quality of life. IEQ strategies such as ventilation effectiveness and control of contaminants or a building

flush-out prior to occupancy can reduce potential liability, increase the market value of the building but can also result in a significantly higher productivity (16%). Other strategies

involve automatic sensors and controls, introducing fresh air to the building or providing lots of daylighting views.


Innovation & Design Process

This category is aimed at recognizing projects that implemented innovative building features and sustainable building knowledge, and whose strategy or measure results

exceeded those which are required by the LEED Rating System. Expertise in sustainable design is the key element of the innovative design and construction process.



Justification for Allocation of Points

Building Name and Level: Marietta Middle School

6-8

Building features that clearly exceed criteria:

1. Corridor width.

2. Gym and Dining well separated from academic spaces.

3. Large windows/plenty of natural light.

4.

5.

6.

Building features that are non-existent or very inadequate:

1. Age of Building.

2. Lots of vertical circulation.

3. Not sprinklered.

4. Accessibility of building and site.

5.

6.


Report Generated at 28 Jan 2020 13:19Justification for Allocation of Points

Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost EstimatesOwner: Marietta City SD

Facility: Marietta Middle School

Date of Initial Assessment: Oct 25, 2017

Date of Assessment Update: Feb 15, 2019

Cost Set: 2019

District IRN: 44321

Building IRN: 22780

Firm: Hammond Construction

Scope remains unchanged after cost updates.

Building Addition Addition Area (sf)Total of Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimates

Renovation Demolition

1926 Academic Building 82,757 $361,323.90 $16,500.00

1929 Original Construction - Gymnasium Addition 38,684 $0.00 $0.00

1951 District IT Offices (Upper Level), Locker Room/Athletic Dept. Stor (Lower Level) 5,948 $0.00 $0.00

1991 Enclosed Walkway and Elevator 1,282 $0.00 $0.00

Total 128,671 $361,323.90 $16,500.00

Total with Regional Cost Factor (101.86%) — $368,044.52 $16,806.90

Regional Total with Soft Costs & Contingency — $457,958.91 $20,912.88


Environmental Hazards - Marietta City SD (44321) - Marietta Middle School (22780) - Academic Building

Environmental Hazards - Marietta City SD (44321) - Marietta Middle School (22780) - Academic Building

Owner: Marietta City SD Bldg. IRN: 22780

Facility: Marietta Middle School BuildingAdd: Academic Building

Date On-Site: Consultant Name:

A. Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) AFM=Asbestos Free Material ACM Found Status Quantity Unit Cost Estimated Cost

1. Boiler/Furnace Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.00 2. Breeching Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.00 3. Tank Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.00 4. Duct Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $8.00 $0.00 5. Pipe Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $10.00 $0.00 6. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $20.00 $0.00 7. Pipe Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel) Not Present 0 $12.00 $0.00 8. Pipe Fitting Insulation Removal (Crawlspace/Tunnel) Not Present 0 $30.00 $0.00 9. Pipe Insulation Removal (Hidden in Walls/Ceilings) Not Present 0 $15.00 $0.00 10. Dismantling of Boiler/Furnace/Incinerator Not Present 0 $2,000.00 $0.00 11. Flexible Duct Connection Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 12. Acoustical Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.00 13. Fireproofing Removal Not Present 0 $25.00 $0.00 14. Hard Plaster Removal Not Present 0 $7.00 $0.00 15. Gypsum Board Removal Not Present 0 $6.00 $0.00 16. Acoustical Panel/Tile Ceiling Removal Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.00 17. Laboratory Table/Counter Top Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 18. Cement Board Removal Not Present 0 $5.00 $0.00 19. Electric Cord Insulation Removal Not Present 0 $1.00 $0.00 20. Light (Reflector) Fixture Removal Not Present 0 $50.00 $0.00 21. Sheet Flooring with Friable Backer Removal Not Present 0 $4.00 $0.00 22. Fire Door Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 23. Door and Window Panel Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 24. Decontamination of Crawlspace/Chase/Tunnel Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.00 25. Soil Removal Not Present 0 $150.00 $0.00 26. Non-ACM Ceiling/Wall Removal (for access) Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.00 27. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno & Demo Not Present 0 $300.00 $0.00 28. Window Component (Compound, Tape, or Caulk) - Reno Only Not Present 0 $300.00 $0.00 29. Resilient Flooring Removal, Including Mastic Assumed Asbestos-Containing Material 5500 $3.00 $16,500.00 30. Carpet Mastic Removal Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.00 31. Carpet Removal (over RFC) Not Present 0 $1.00 $0.00 32. Acoustical Tile Mastic Removal Not Present 0 $3.00 $0.00 33. Sink Undercoating Removal Not Present 0 $100.00 $0.00 34. Roofing Removal Not Present 0 $2.00 $0.00 35. (Sum of Lines 1-34) Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Renovation Work $16,500.0036. (Sum of Lines 1-34) Total Asb. Hazard Abatement Cost for Demolition Work $16,500.00

B. Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks None Reported

Tank No. Location Age Product Stored Size Est.Rem.Cost1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost For Removal Of Underground Storage Tanks $0.00

C. Lead-Based Paint (LBP) - Renovation Only Addition Constructed after 19801. Estimated Cost For Abatement Contractor to Perform Lead Mock-Ups $0.00 2. Special Engineering Fees for LBP Mock-Ups $0.00 3. (Sum of Lines 1-2) Total Cost for Lead-Based Paint Mock-Ups $0.00

D. Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Recycling/Incineration Not Applicable Area Of Building Addition Square Feet w/Fluorescent Lamps & Ballasts Unit Cost Total Cost

1. 82757 0 $0.10 $0.00

E. Other Environmental Hazards/Remarks None ReportedDescription Cost Estimate

1. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Renovation $0.002. (Sum of Lines 1-0) Total Cost for Other Environmental Hazards - Demolition $0.00

F. Environmental Hazards Assessment Cost Estimate Summaries1. A35, B1, C3, D1, and E1 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Renovation $16,500.002. A36, B1, D1, and E2 Total Cost for Env. Hazards Work - Demolition $16,500.00

* INSPECTION ASSUMPTIONS for Reported/Assumed Asbestos-Free Materials (Rep/Asm AFM):

a. Unless reported otherwise by the District, materials installed after 1980 are assumed to be asbestos-free.

b. Unless reported otherwise by the District, small quantities (less than 1,000 square feet) of the following materials are assumed to be asbestos free: hard plaster,acoustical plaster and gypsum board systems; acoustical panels and tiles; fireproofing; 12"×12" floor tile and mastic.

c. Unless reported otherwise by the District, all roofing materials are assumed to be asbestos-free.

THESE MATERIALS SHOULD BE PROPERLY SAMPLED AND ANALYZED FOR ASBESTOS PRIOR TO DISTURBING THEM.
