building information modeling (bim) adoption in ......building designs and data into detailed...
TRANSCRIPT
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 902 [email protected]
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET)
Volume 9, Issue 9, September 2018, pp. 902–915, Article ID: IJCIET_09_09_086
Available online at http://www.iaeme.com/ijciet/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=9&IType=9
ISSN Print: 0976-6308 and ISSN Online: 0976-6316
©IAEME Publication Scopus Indexed
BUILDING INFORMATION MODELING (BIM)
ADOPTION IN ARCHITECTURAL FIRMS IN
LAGOS, NIGERIA
E. O. Ibem
Department of Architecture, Covenant University, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria
U. O. Uwakonye
Department of Architecture, Covenant University, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria
G. O. Akpoiroro
Department of Architecture, Covenant University, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria
M. Somtochukwu
Department of Architecture, Covenant University, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria
C.A. Oke
Department of Architecture, Covenant University, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria
ABSTRACT
As Nigeria develops technologically, the use of building information modeling
(BIM) in delivery of building and infrastructure projects cannot be overemphasized. In
spite of the benefits of BIM in the construction industry, very little is known on the
impact of BIM in architectural practices in Nigeria. Therefore, the aim of this study
was to investigate the impact of BIM on architectural firms in Lagos, Southwest
Nigeria. Among other things, the study investigated the level of awareness of BIM in
architectural firms, the most commonly used BIM software packages, the aspects of
architectural work supported by BIM and its benefits in architectural practice. The
data were collected via a questionnaire survey of 110 architects in Lagos and
analysed using descriptive statistics. The result shows that there is a high level of
awareness of BIM among architects in Lagos and the most common BIM software
packages used are Autodesk Revit Architecture, AUTOCAD, and Google Sketchup.
The respondents used these software packages more in the preparation of 2D
drawings, 3D visualization, architectural detailing, and modeling and less of analyses.
The result also revealed that the use of BIM enhanced the overall productivity of
architectural firms in the study area. To maximise the benefits of BIM in project
delivery, the study recommends that specific programmes and policies be put in place
by firms, professional associations and government aimed at improving the knowledge
base of architects on BIM and promoting its industry wide adoption in Nigeria..
E.O. Ibem, U.O. Uwakonye, G.O. Akpoiroro, M. Somtochukwu and C.A. Oke
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 903 [email protected]
Key words: Architects, BIM, Construction Industry, Lagos, Questionnaire Survey
Cite this Article: E.O. Ibem, U.O. Uwakonye, G.O. Akpoiroro, M. Somtochukwu and
C.A. Oke, Building Information Modeling (BIM) Adoption in Architectural Firms in
Lagos, Nigeria. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(9),
2018, pp. 902-915.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/issues.asp?JType=IJCIET&VType=9&IType=9
1. INTRODUCTION
In the quest to improve the sustainability and productivity profile of the construction industry,
digital technologies have been adopted to support the execution of construction procurement
activities. Consequently, the architecture profession is now able to conceptualize and translate
building designs and data into detailed construction information through new processes and
techniques made available via the building information modeling (BIM). According to
Berard, Vestergaard and Karlshøj (2002), BIM is a collection of interlinked domains of model
with all necessary information for the design, construction, and maintenance of building
and/or infrastructure projects. BIM is essentially a 3-Dimensional digital representation of a
building and its intrinsic characteristics features in different models such as architectural
design, construction, schedule, cost model, fabrication and operation model used in the
delivery of building and other physical infrastructure projects (Hergunsel, 2011; Onungwa,
Uduma-Olugu & Igwe 2017).
There is a growing consensus in the literature that the use of digital tools like BIM has a
great potential for improving the quality of services provided by professionals in the design,
engineering, construction and real estate industry (Dossick and Neff, 2010; Fadeyi, 2017).
Specifically, the architecture profession has been greatly impacted since the introduction of
computer and its associated technologies to the architectural practice (Ibem, Aduwo & Ayo-
Vaughan, 2017). The study by Celanto (2017) reveals that architects are using BIM mainly
because it enables them visualize their designs before the actual construction work
commences on site; and thus contribute to reducing ambiguities, errors leading to saving some
money for their clients as changes made to either the digital model or the database are
automatically updated and coordinated in the entire model. In addition, the advent of BIM has
enhanced effective collaborations among architects, client, engineers, building services,
manufacturers, contractors and other consultants involved in the procurement of building and
infrastructure projects, which was hitherto very difficult (Yan, Culp and Graf, 2011) .
Among the several benefits of using BIM is that professionals involved in the
procurement of building projects are able to transfer building modelled information virtually
from the design team, including the architect, civil engineers, surveyors, structural,
mechanical and electrical engineers to the main contractors, sub-contractors and suppliers on
the project (Yan et al., 2011), therefore reducing information loss and delays that usually
occur using the manual design and drafting tools and processes (Fadeyi, 20127; Nadeem et
al.,2008; Muhammad, Abdullah, Ismail and Takim, 2018). In fact, the literature is replete
with copious evidences of the benefits of the adoption of BIM in the architecture, engineering
and construction industry globally.
Although there is a growing body of research on the use of BIM among design,
construction and real estate professionals, very few studies on the extent of its adoption are
available in a developing country like Nigeria. It is observed from the literature that several
fragmented studies have been carried out on BIM in the context of the Nigerian construction
industry. Some of these existing studies (Abubakar, Ibrahim, Kado & Bala, 2014; Akerele &
Etiene, 2016; Ologboyega, 2016; Ologboyega & Aina, 2016; 2018; Okoye, Ezeokonkwo and
Ezeokolie, 2016; Onungwa et al., 2017) have attempted to investigate the level of awareness
Building Information Modeling (BIM) Adoption in Architectural Firms in Lagos, Nigeria
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 904 [email protected]
and adoption of BIM in the Nigerian construction industry. However, one major flaw of these
studies is that they all viewed the construction industry as a monolithic entity as they failed to
recognise the uniqueness of the different professions in this industry. The architecture
profession plays a leading role in the design of building projects, and thus, adequate knowlege
is required on the level of adoption of BIM in the architecture industry. Notably, apart from
the study by Dare-Abel, Igwe and Ayo (2014) that indentified the availability of BIM literate
staff in architectural firms in Nigeria, studies on the adoption of BIM by architectural firms in
this country are very minuscule.
In view of the foregoing, this study sought to investigate BIM use among architectural
firms in Lagos, southwest Nigeria with a view to understanding the current state of use and
the benefits associated with this. The study attempted to address the following four research
questions.
To what extent are architects employed in architectural firms in Lagos, Nigeria aware of BIM?
Which BIM software packages are currently used in architectural practice in the study area?
Which aspects of architectural practice are executed with the help of BIM software packages?
What are the benefits BIM in project delivery by architectural practices in Lagos, Nigeria?
This research is based on a questionnaire survey of 110 practicing architects in Lagos,
Nigeria. It makes contribution by improving understanding of the different BIM software
packages used by architects to support the execution of design, drafting, and visualization,
simulation, and analyses tasks. The study also provides a fresh insight into the direct benefits
of using BIM in architectural practice from the Nigerian perspective.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1. Origin and meaning of BIM
Historical facts show that the conceptual development of BIM dates back to the earliest days
of computing. It is on record that Charles Eastman was the first man to successfully create a
building database known as building description system (BDS). This system, which was
developed based on a graphical user interface, orthographic, perspective views describes
individual library elements of buildings and allowed its users to retrieve information by
attributes and add it to an existing model (Eastman, 2011). As result of its drafting and
analysis efficiencies, it had great potentials to reduce the cost of design by over 50%
(Eastman, 2011). It was based on the BDS technology that in 1984, Radar CH was developed
for the Apple Lisa Operating System, and this later became ArchiCAD, which is today
recognized as the first BIM software used on personal computers (Jack, 2008).
In the last few decades, there has been increasing interest on BIM by authors, scholars,
and practitioners (Fadeyi, 2017; Muhammad et al., 2018). Consequently, sevarl definitions
and interpretations have been aascribed to BIM. Whereas Eastman (2011) described BIM as a
repository of data and information for building design, erection, and maintenance available to
all project stakeholders, some authors (Ibem, and Laryea, 2014; Akerele and Etiene, 2016)
have described BIM as a design and collaborative tool used in the procurement of
construction projects. Autodesk (2016) also views BIM as an intelligent 3D model-based
process that helps professionals in the AEC industry to efficiently plan, design, construct, and
manage buildings and infrastructure projects. From the foregoing definitions, it can be
inferred that BIM has been viewed from four main perspectives, namely as a structured
dataset describing a building; as a tool for creating building and project information; the act of
creating a building information model; and a business structure or system for effective
E.O. Ibem, U.O. Uwakonye, G.O. Akpoiroro, M. Somtochukwu and C.A. Oke
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 905 [email protected]
management of activities related to the design, planning, erection, management and operation
of building and infrastructure projects.
2.2. BIM and Architectural Practice
Although the term “architecture” has been defined in diverse ways in the literature, in the
context of this study, architecture is defined as the profession that deals with „the art and
science of design, construction, commissioning, maintenance, management and coordination
of all professional activities involved in a building project, layout and master plan of a
building or groups of buildings and any other organized enclosed or open space, required for
human activities (ARCON, 2004). By this definition, it is clear that architectural practice
encompasses the provision of services related to the design, planning, and supervising the
erection of buildings and their surroundings for human activities such as living, working,
worshiping and recreation/sporting. Therefore, Oluwatayo and Amole (2012) described
architectural firms as business-orientated organizations established to provide professional
architectural services to their clients.
As is true in other countries of the world, architects render a wide range of services to
their clients. In Nigeria for instance, architects are known to render various kinds of design,
supervision and coordination/management services at the design, tendering, construction and
post construction phases of building projects (ARCON & NIA, 2011). Hallberg (2010) has
observed that BIM as a tool is capable of supporting the execution of various services
rendered by architectural firms in both in the real and virtual environments. The author further
explained that among other things, the use of BIM enables the creation of 3D design model
that helps architects to visualize their proposed structure in three dimensions; suggesting that
BIM is not just a design tool but a master data source of a structure and the foundation for
ensuring that business functions are driven in a place (Autodesk, 2016; Fadeyi, 2017). In
addition, BIM is also seen as a virtual collaborative tool that allows for the use of more
realistic scenarios that better represent real-life challenges (Succar 2009; Ologboyega & Aina,
2018). In fact, Goldberg (2005) and Ologboyega and Aina, (2018) have insisted that with
BIM, virtual models building are developed and the construction process simulated, studied
and experimented with adjustments made where necessary before the building project is
constructed.
BIM tools can be classified into in three broad categories based on the task they can be
used to execute. These are computer-aided architectural design (CAAD), simulation, and
visualization tools (Goldberg, 2005). The CAAD tools are software developed for the purpose
of replacing the traditional means of drafting, which involves the use of drafting boards,
paper, pen, or pencils and allow architects to develop architectural drawings on the computer
before presentation to them to their clients (Ibem, and Laryea, 2014; Dare-Abel, Igwe & Ayo,
2014; Al-Matarneh and Fethi, 2017). Examples of CAAD software packages used by
archietcs include Abis, Allplan, ArchiCAD, AutoCAD, Accurender, Blender, Bricscad,
Caddie, Maya, formZ, Spirit, Revit, Lumion, 3Ds Max, CINEMA 4D, Digital Project,
SolidWorks, Rhinoceros 3D, Vectorworks and Google SketchUp (Clayton et al., 2002).
On the one hand, the simulation tools are used in predicting, validating, and optimizing
architectural drawings developed by architects by using accurate data and analysis produced
by software packages. They have the capacity of providing mechanical simulations,
computational fluid dynamics, and manufacturing simulations. Some of them include: bSol,
DAYSIM, Ecotect, eQUEST, IDA ICE, EDG II, T*Sol, EliteCAD, IES VE, LESOSAI,
DesignBuilder, Design Performance Viewer (DPV) and Green Building Studio (Clayton et al,
2002). On the other hand, the visualization tools help architects to visualize the architectural,
structural and mechanical, electrical and plumbing components of buildings to ensure that
Building Information Modeling (BIM) Adoption in Architectural Firms in Lagos, Nigeria
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 906 [email protected]
each contains the right and adequate information in terms of size, shape and location amongst
others (Yan, Culp, and Graf, 2011). Clayton et al. (2002) identified some of the visualization
tools to include V‐Ray, Artlantis, POV‐Ray, YafaRay, Mental Ray, LuxRender, Flamingo,
LightWave, RenderZone, RenderMan, Photoshop, Kerkythea, RenderWorks, Maxwell Render
and Adobe After effects.
2.3. Benefits of BIM in Architectural Practice
The adoption of BIM has resulted to several benefits in the AEC industry. For instance,
Nadeem et al. (2008) reported that BIM use was associated with benefits such as the removal
of unbudgeted variations, improving accuracy of cost estimation; reduction in turnaround time
for the production cost estimate and delivery time of a project. There is also evidence in the
literature indicating that BIM helps architects to resolve issues at the design stage that would
not have been possible using the traditional design tools of pen, paper, and boards
(Ologboyega & Aina, 2018). It also helps in review of designs; engenders cost and schedule
savings in design and construction works; and allows for effective integration of the inputs of
contractors and suppliers at the design stage leading to improving the constructability of
projects. Succar (2009) also identified the benefits of BIM to include identification of
conflicts between various building systems instantaneously; reduction of the fragmentation of
the construction industry in prompting seamless linking of the different segments of the
industry; improving the efficiency in the industry; lower the costs of exchange and use of
information associated amongst construction project stakeholders; and providing an
alternative solution for coordinating design as designs can be reviewed in a virtual model.
In addition to these, it has also been found by Linderoth (2010) that at the conceptual
development phase of a building project, the use of BIM facilitates rapid visualization and
accurate updating of changes; increased communication across the entire project development
team; offers improvement in architectural and engineering design quality in terms of error free
drawings leading to a steady improvement in productivity. Linderoth (2010) also added that
the end result of using BIM is improved project coordination, minimization of errors as well
as reduction in unnecessary delays and conflicts, which could lead to a potential cost savings
of between 15% to 40%. Clayton et al. (2002) also reported that in a country like the USA,
over 80% of BIM users had indicated a very positive impact on their firm‟s productivity and
project outcomes improved project outcomes. In Nigeria, Olugboyega and Aina (2016)
reported that construction professionals were using BIM because simply because they wanted
to impress their prospective clients and improve on the quality of their services. Another
study by Olugboyega (2016) on the development of Eko Atlantic City, Lagos Nigeria, revealed
that the geometries and the structural systems of the city and its buildings were developed made
using BIM; and that BIM was also used to develop animation of districts, water supply, and
drainage design model, and simulation of sea wall construction for the city. In addition, a recent
study in Nigeria by Onungwa et al. (2017) also revealed that BIM has a significant impact on
the effectiveness of the supervision of projects, programming, and resolution of conflicts and
improving efficiency in the design and construction stages of projects. In sum, Fadeyi (2017)
concluded that BIM has thus far produced a significant positive impact on building and
infrastructure project delivery by improving information and knowledge management the
entire project life cycle.
3. RESEARCH METHODS
The research design and approach adopted in this study were cross-sectional survey and
quantitative research approach, respectively. Consequently, both primary and secondary data
were used. Whereas the former were gathered via the administration of structured
questionnaire, the later were sourced thorough the review of published literature on the
E.O. Ibem, U.O. Uwakonye, G.O. Akpoiroro, M. Somtochukwu and C.A. Oke
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 907 [email protected]
subject investigated. The use of questionnaire survey in the collection of primary data was
informed by the nature of the research questions and the need to reach as many architects as
possible in Lagos at a very short period.
The target population for the survey was architects practicing in Lagos, southwest Nigeria,
while the sampling frame comprised the Architects‟ Registration Council of Nigeria
(ARCON) registered architectural firms in Nigeria that have with office in Lagos State. The
ARCON is the statutory body empowered by law to maintain and publish a register of
architectural firms authorized to practice in Nigeria on a yearly basis. The register for 2016
revealed that a total of 315 registered architectural firms had offices in Lagos State. In order
to ensure that a representative number of firms participated in the survey, the sample size was
determined using the formula for finite population given as
(Yamane, 1967)
Where n represents the sample size, which in this case is the number of firms to be
selected ; N is total number of registered architectural firm in Lagos State ( i.e. 315); e is the
assumed level precision taken to be ± 5% (e=0.05), while the confidence level is 95%. Using
the foregoing parameters, following shows how the sample size was actually determined.
n =315/1+190 (0.052)
n= 315/1+190(0.0025)
n=315/1.475
n= 213.55 =214 architectural firms
The structured questionnaire used in gathering primary data for this research was designed
by the researchers based on the objectives of the study and findings from the published
literature. The questionnaire had three sections. Section 1 deals with some background
information on the participants, while Section 2 was used to collect data on the respondents‟
use of BIM. In this section, the participants were asked to indicate the frequency of use of 22
different BIM software packages using 3-Point Likert type scale of “1” for Never, “2” for
Occasionally, and “3” for Frequently. Then Section 3 helped in the gathering of data on the
benefits of BIM use in architectural practice as experienced by the respondents. In this
section, the participants were asked to indicate their levels of agreement with ten statements
related to the benefits of BIM in based on a 5-Point Likert type scale ranging from “1” for
Strongly Disagree to “5” for Strongly Agree. To ensure that all categories of architects working in registered firms in the study area
were given equal chance to participate in the survey, a random sampling technique was
adopted in the selection of participants in this research. Prior to the main survey, the
questionnaire instrument was pretested among some selected architects in the neighbouring
town of Ota, Ogun State and reviewed by experts as well as established researchers. Feedback
from the pre-testing exercise helped in fine-tuning some of the questionnaires in the
questionnaire. The data collection process involved administration of the questionnaire by
hand in the randomly selected architectural firms in the study area. A copy of the
questionnaire was given to one architect or a preventative of the firm found at the time the
researchers visited the firms. The survey took place between February and March 2017 and of
the 214 copied of questionnaire distributed, 110 copies representing around 51.4% of the
distributed questionnaires were retrieved and found to have been correctly filled by the
participants.
The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) was used in the analysis of the data
In view of the nature of the four research questions of this study; the data were analysed using
only descriptive statistics. This enabled the computation of frequencies, percentages, and
Building Information Modeling (BIM) Adoption in Architectural Firms in Lagos, Nigeria
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 908 [email protected]
means scores of the responses provided by the participants. The results are presented using
frequency distributions, percentages table, charts for easy understanding and drawing of
conclusions.
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1. Basic Information about the Respondents in the Survey
In the survey, some information about the respondents was collected and the frequency
distributions and percentages are shown in Table 1.
Table 1 Some basic information about the respondents
It is evident in the data in Table 1 that a majority (80%) of the respondents in the survey
were not fully registered with the ARCON, which is the regulatory body for the practice of
architecture in Nigeria, while only 20% were fully registered with the ARCON. It is also clear
from Table 1 that 75% of the respondents were between 20 years and 29 years and have had
professional experience of between one year and 5 years. It can be inferred from this result
that a high majority of the respondents are fresh university and polytechnic graduates; and
hence, they were yet to be fully registered with the ARCON.
Figure 1 Respondnets‟ Level of awareness of BIM
N=110 Percentage (%)
Registration Status
Registered 20 18.2
Not Registered 88 80.0
No Response 2 1.8
Age Grouping ( years)
20-29 82 75
30-39 10 9.1
40-49 9 8.2
50+ 9 8.2
Years of professional experience
1-5 years 80 72.7
6-10 years 8 7.3
11-15 years 8 7.3
16-20 years 6 5.4
20 years + 8 7.3
E.O. Ibem, U.O. Uwakonye, G.O. Akpoiroro, M. Somtochukwu and C.A. Oke
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 909 [email protected]
Figure 1 is a display of the result on the respondents‟ level of awareness of BIM. From the
result in Figure 1, it is evident that around 97% of the respondents claimed that they were
aware of BIM. This suggests that almost all the architects encountered in the survey are aware
of BIM. This result has implication of the use of BIM software packages
Although this result is contrary to the findings by Akerela and Etiene (2016), which
reported that there was generally low level of awareness about the use of BIM among
professionals in the Nigerian construction industry in Lagos State, it appears to provide
support to an earlier study by Dare-Abel et al. (2014) indicating that employees of
architectural firms in Nigeria are BIM literate. Since awareness is the first stage in the
adoption process as postulated by Rogers (1995), this finding may have implication on the use
of BIM amongst the participants of the current research,
4.2. BIM Software packages used by the respondents
Table 2 is a display of the result on the frequency of use by the respondents of the 22 BIM
software packages investigated in the survey. From the result in Table 2, it is evident that a
majority (75.2%) of the respondents used Autodesk Revit Architecture, followed by 62.4%
that used AUTOCAD and 43.1 % that claimed to be using Google Sketchup. These three
software pacakages have been identified as CAAD tools that allow architects to develop
architectural plans, compile layouts, and design conceptual elements and present complete
design drawings on the computer before presentation to the clients (Dare-Abel et al., 2014;
Ibem & Layea, 2014; Al-Matarneh and Fethi, 2017). However, among the least used BIM
software packages include Bricscad, Cattia, DDS, Houdini, SolidWorks, Vectorworks and
others. It can be inferred from this result that the most commonly used BIM software by the
participants in this research is Autodesk Revit Architecture. This is not a surprise because;
Autodesk Revit Architecture was specifically designed and developed to meet the needs of
architects. Table 2 Frequency of use of CAAD BIM software packages
BIM software packages Never Occasionally Frequently
n(%) n(%) n(%)
Allplan 99(90.8) 8(7.3) 2(1.8)
ArchiCAD 64(58.7) 26(23.9) 19(17.4)
AutoCAD 20(18.3) 21(19.3) 68(62.4)
Blender 104(95.4) 3(2.8) 2(1.8)
Bricscad 108(99.1) 0(0.0) 1(0.9)
Caddie 107(89.2) 2(1.8) 0(0.0)
Cattia 108(99.1) 0(0.0) 1(0.9)
DDS 108(99.1) 1(0.9) 0(0.0)
Digital Project 106(97.2) 2(1.8) 1(0.9)
Form.Z 105(96.3) 1(0.9) 3(2.8)
Google Sketchup 33(30.3) 29(26.6) 47(43.1)
Houdini 108(99.1) 1(0.9) 0(0.0)
Lightworks 102(93.6) 5(4.6) 2(1.8)
Lumion 40(36.7) 32(29.4) 37(33.9)
Maya 91(83.5) 12(11.0) 6(5.5)
Revit 11(10.1) 16(14.7) 82(75.2)
Rhinoceros 3D 91(83.5) 13(11.9) 5(4.6)
SolidWorks 106(97.2) 3(2.8) 0(0.0)
Vectorworks 108(99.1) 1(0.9) 0(0.0)
3Ds Max 42(38.5) 30(27.5) 37(33.9)
Cinema 4D 99(90.8) 8(7.3) 2(1.8)
Spirit 108(99.1) 1(0.9) 0(0.0)
.
Building Information Modeling (BIM) Adoption in Architectural Firms in Lagos, Nigeria
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 910 [email protected]
Table 3 shows the result of frequency of use of BIM visualization tools by the architects
sampled. Form the result; it is evident that Photoshop and V-Ray were the most common
visualization tools used with 45% and 43.1% of the respondents, respectively indicating that
they used them. The least used are Flamingo; Yafaray, Lightwave and others.
Table 3 Frequency of use of BIM Visualization tools
4.3. Activities Executed using BIM Software Packages
Table shows the different activities the architects sampled carry out with the use of the
identified BIM software packages.
Table 3 Actual use of BIM for the different activities
Activities Response n (%)
2D drawings (plans, elevations and
sections)
Yes 109(99.1)
No 0(0.0)
No Response 1(0.9)
Coordination of construction documents Yes 72(65.5)
No 37(33.6)
No Response 1(0.9)
Scheduling
Yes 75(68.2)
No 34(30.9)
No Response 1(0.9)
3D visualization Yes 104(94.5)
No 5(4.5)
No Response 1(0.9)
Architectural modelling Yes 103(93.6)
No 6(5.5)
No Response 1(0.9)
Detailing Yes 104(94.5)
No 5(4.5)
No Response 1(0.9)
Material Take-off Yes 42(38.2)
No 67(61.0)
No Response 1(0.9)
Fixture, fitting and furniture procurement Yes 67(61.0)
No 42(38.2)
Visualization tools Never Occasionally Frequently
n(%) n(%) n(%)
Artlantis 95(87.2) 9(8.3) 5(4.6)
Flamingo 108(99.1) 1(0.9) 0(0.0)
Kerkythea 105(96.3) 4(3.7) 0(0.0)
Lightwave 107(98.2) 1(0.9) 1(0.9)
LuxRender 105(96.3) 4(3.7) 0(0.0)
Maxwell Render 100(91.7) 7(6.4) 2(1.8)
MentalRay 92(84.4) 11(10.1) 6(5.5)
RenderMan 106(97.2) 1(0.9) 2(1.8)
Render works 58(95.1) 1(0.9) 2(3.3)
RenderZone 106(97.2) 1(0.9) 2(1.8)
V-Ray 42(38.5) 20(18.3) 47(43.1)
Yafaray 108(99.1) 1(0.9) 0(0.0)
Photoshop 32(29.4) 28(25.7) 49(45.0)
Adobeafter effects 77(70.3) 15(13.8) 17(15.6)
E.O. Ibem, U.O. Uwakonye, G.O. Akpoiroro, M. Somtochukwu and C.A. Oke
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 911 [email protected]
No Response 1(0.9)
Component Properties Yes 61(55.5)
No 48(43.6)
No Response 1(0.9)
Daylight integration/Lighting analysis
Yes 54(49.1)
No 55(50.0)
No Response 1(0.9)
Structural Analysis Yes 43(39.1)
No 66(60.0)
No Response 1(0.9)
Energy Analysis Yes 26(23.6)
No 83(75.5)
No Response 1(0.9)
Heat Analysis Yes 21(19.1)
No 88(80.0)
No Response 1(0.9)
It is obvious from Table 3 that the architects sampled use the identified BIM software
packages to support the execution of different kind of activities in their practices. The most
predominant activities these software packages are used for include the preparation of 2D-
architectural drawings (i.e. plans, elevations, and sections); 3D visualization; Architectural
modeling, detailing, and scheduling. Relating these results to the findings indicating that the
two most commonly used software packages are Autodesk Revit Architecture and
AUTOCAD, it is obvious that these software packages are very important tools architects use
to support the execution of their design, planning and modeling tasks. This result seems to
corroborate the earlier findings by Dare-Abel et al. (2014) indicating that architectural firms
in Nigeria were building human capacity in the area of use of information technologies and
BIM. In addition, the finding also seems to be line with the most recent study by Olugboyega
and Aina (2018) which revealed that levels of use of 2D and 3D BIM models were very high
and that the status of BIM adoption in construction industry in Lagos State, Nigeria was at the
visualization phase. The result in Table 3 also reveals that most commonly analysis the
architects use BIM software packages for was daylight integration/Lighting analysis, followed
by structural analysis, energy analysis and heat analysis, respectively
4.4. Benefits of BIM use in Architectural Practice
The responses of the participants of the survey on the benefits of BIM use in the execution of
the activities listed in Table 3 are presented in Table 4.
Table 4 Benefits of BIM use in architectural practice
Benefits of BIM use Strongly
Disagree
Disagree Not Sure Agree Strongly
Agree
Mean
Score
n(%) n (%) n (%) n(%) n(%)
Improvement of the
quality of our design
proposals
2(1.8) 4(3.6) 0(0.0) 54(49.1) 50(45.5) 4.33
Improves the
productivity of
architectural firms
4(3.6) 0(0.0) 8(7.3) 45(41.0) 53(48.1)
4.30
Improves design
communication
between professionals
in a project
4(3.6) 1(1.0) 6(5.5) 51(46.3) 48(43.6) 4.25
Improvement of
quality of technical
2(1.8) 2(1.8) 12(11.0) 57(51.8) 37(33.6) 4.15
Building Information Modeling (BIM) Adoption in Architectural Firms in Lagos, Nigeria
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 912 [email protected]
From the result in Table 4, it can be seen that although the participants agree that BIM use
has resulted to positive impact on all the ten aspects of architectural practice investigated, the
benefit are mostly significant in the improvement of quality of architectural design proposals,
productivity of the firms, design communication and quality of technical specification, the
impact is least noticed in the delivery of quality buildings to the client. These results is seen in
the mean scores of the response with the improvement of the quality of our design proposals
having the highest mean score of 4.33 and delivery of more quality buildings to clients with
the least mean score of 3.44. These results are consistent with the findings of previous studies
in the USA (Linderoth, 2010; Clayton et al., 2002) indicating that users of BIM in that
country also reported similar benefits. There is also empirical evidence in previous studies in
Nigeria (Olugboyega, 2016) and in the literature (Nadeem et al., 2008; Hergunsel, 2011; Dim,
Ezeabasili and Okoro, 2015). The emergence of improved quality design proposal and
productivity of firms as the top two benefits and the delivery of more quality buildings to
clients as the least benefit of BIM din not come as a surprise. This is because in a building
project, the preparation of architectural design proposals an coordination of the inputs of
allied professionals are among the key responsibilities of the architect, while the translation of
the design proposals to buildings involves many professionals and non-professionals in the
industry; and thus there is a significant difference in the quality of design proposal and that of
actual buildings constructed. In any case, it is evident in this study that the use of BIM has
some significant benefits in architectural practice in the study area.
5. CONCLUSIONS
This study investigated the use of BIM among architects in architectural firms in Lagos,
Nigeria with a view to understanding the level of awareness, current state of use of BIM and
the benefits associated with this. Based on the results, the following conclusions can be made.
The first conclusion is that there is a high level of awareness on BIM among the architects
encountered in the survey. The second conclusion is that the most commonly used CAAD
BIM software packages are Autodesk Revit Architecture, AutoCAD and Google sketch up,
while Photoshop and V-ray were the most commonly used BIM visualization tools. The next
conclusion is that the most predominant activities the architects use BIM software packages
execute are the preparation of 2D architectural drawings, 3D visualization and architectural
modeling, and detailing. The last conclusion is that top two benefits of BIM use are
improvement of the quality of design proposals and productivity of the firms.
specifications
Reduction of
turnaround time for
the completion of
design works
10(9.1) 6(5.5) 6(5.5) 42(38.1) 46(41.8) 3.98
Makes design
changes and rework
easy to implement
10 (9.1) 6(5.5) 6(5.5) 42(38.2) 46(41.8)
3.98
Reduced the cost
manpower
2(1.8) 6(5.5) 29(26.3) 33(30.0) 40(36.4) 3.94
Reduction in errors
in design works
6(5.5) 8(7.3) 15(14.0) 39(35.5) 42(38.2) 3.94
More patronage by
clients
4(3.6) 3
(2.7
)
18(20.0) 43(39.1) 42(38.2) 3.64
Delivery of more
quality buildings to
clients
39(35.0) 4(3.6) 2(2.2) 0(0.0) 65(59.1)
3.44
E.O. Ibem, U.O. Uwakonye, G.O. Akpoiroro, M. Somtochukwu and C.A. Oke
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 913 [email protected]
This study has some key implications that are noteworthy. The first implication is that there is
increasing awareness and use of BIM software packages among architects in the study areas,
especially, the younger generation of architects. This is probably because, the use of BIM is
currently being taught and used in schools in Nigeria as an alternative to manual design and
drafting tool. This implies that the older generation of architects needs acquire skills on the
use of BIM through continuous professional training programmes like those mounted by the
ARCON. The study also implies that there is a limited use of BIM tools for analyses when
compared to their use for design and drafting, hence, capacity building is needed in the area of
optimization of the various BIM tools in architectural practice. This is very vital in
maximizing the benefits associated with BIM in architectural practice this in the study area.
The last implication of the study is that, the benefits of BIM in architectural practice are
becoming more pronounced and significant than before, and thus, there is a high prospect of
BIM to transform architectural practice in Nigeria as it is the case in other countries of the
world.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors wish to acknowledge the efforts and commitments of the Covenant University
Center for Research, Innovation, and Discovery (CUCRID) in promoting research.
REFERENCES
[1] Abubakar, M, Ibrahim, Y. M., Kado, D and Bala, K.Contractors Perception of the
Factors Affecting Building Information Modelling(BIM) Adoption in the Nigerian
Construction Industry. Computing in Civil and Building Engineering 8(2), 2014, pp. 167-
178
[2] Akerele, A. O., & Etiene, M. (2016). Assessment of the Level of Awareness and
Limitations on the use of Building Information Modelling In Lagos State. International
Journal of Scientific and Research Publication, 6(2),2016, pp. 229-234.
[3] Al-Matarneh, R. and Fethi, I. Assessing the Impact of CAAD Design Tool On
Architectural Design Education, Malaysian Online Journal of Educational
Technology, 5(1), 2017, pp.1-20
[4] Architects Registration Council of Nigeria (ARCON) Decree No. 10 of 1969 further
amended by Decree No. 43 of 1990) now Architects (Registration, Etc) Act CAP A19 the
Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004. Lagos: ARCON
[5] Architects Registration Council of Nigeria (ARCON) and the Nigerian Institute of
Architects (NIA). Conditions of Engagement and Remuneration for Professional
Architect's services, Abuja: ARCON, 2011, pp .1-32
[6] Autodesk . What is BIM ? | Building Information Modeling | Autodesk. 2016 October
2016, from Autodesk Website: http://www.autodesk.com.
[7] Berard, O. B., Vestergaard, F., & Karlshøj, J. Building Information Modeling for
Managing Design and Construction: Assessing Design Information Quality. Kgs. Lyngby:
Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2012
orbit.dtu.dk/files/51481374/Ole_Bengt_Berard_Thesis.pdf.
[8] Celanto, D. Innovate or Perish: New Technologies and Architecture‟s Future. Harvard
Design Magazine 26, 2017. http://www.harvarddesignmagazine.org/issues/26/innovate-
or-perish-new-technologies-and-architectures-future.
Building Information Modeling (BIM) Adoption in Architectural Firms in Lagos, Nigeria
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 914 [email protected]
[9] Clayton, M.J., Warden, R. B., & Parker, T.W. Virtual construction of architecture using
3D CAD and Simulation. Automation in Construction, 11(2), 2002, pp. 227-234.
[10] Dare-Abel, O. A., Igwe, J.M. & Ayo, C.K. Proficiency, and Capacity Building of Human
Capital in Architectural Firms in Nigeria. International Journal of Architecture and
Design, 25(2), 2014, pp.1133-1139
[11] Dim, N. U., Ezeabasili, A. C. C., and Okoro, B. U. (2015) Managing the change process
associated with BIM implementation by the public and private investors in the Nigerian
Building Industry. Donnish Journal of Engineering and Manufacturing Technology, 2(1),
2015, pp.1-6
[12] Dossick C. S. and Neff, G. Organizational Divisions in BIM-enabled Commercial
Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 136(4), 2010, pp.
459-467.
[13] Eastman, C., Teicholz, P., Sacks, R, and Liston, K. BIM Handbook: A Guide to Building
Information Modeling for Owners, Managers, Designers, Engineers and Contractors, New
YorK: John Wiley and Sons, 2008.
[14] Fadeyi, M.O. The Role of Building Information Modelling in Delivering the Sustainable
Building value. International Journal of Susatinable Built Environment, 6, 2017, pp.711-
722
[15] Goldberg, H. Software Strategy: BIM Comparison: How Does BIM Software Stack Up
with the 3D Model Concept?”. CADalyst January 2005.
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_mOBLL/is_1_22/ai_n11836215/?tag=content;col1
[16] Hallberg, D. On the use of open BIM and 4D Visualisation in a predictive life cycle
management system for construction works. Journal of Information Technology in
Construction, 16, 2010, pp. 445-466.
[17] Hergunsel, M. Benefits of Building Information Modelling for Construction Managers
and BIM-based Scheduling. a thesis Submitted to the Faulty of Worcester Polytechnic
Institute in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in
Civil Engineering, 2011 https://web.wpi.edu/Pubs/ETD/Available/etd-
042011.../MHergunsel_Thesis_BIM.pdf.
[18] Ibem, E.O, Aduwo, E. B. and Ayo-Vaughan, E. K. e-Procurement Adoption in the
Nigerian Building Industry: Architects‟ Perspective. POLLACK PERIODICA, 12(3),
2017, pp.167-180
[19] Ibem, E.O. and Laryea, S. (2014). Survey of Digital Technologies in Procurement of
Construction Projects. Automation in Construction, 46, 2014, pp. 11-21
[20] Jack. C. CAD history. CAD History., 2008 http://www.eod.gvsd.edu/eod/design/design-
133.html.
[21] Linderoth, H. C. (2010). Understanding Adoption and Use of BIM as the Creation of
Actor Networks. Automation in Construction, 19(1), 2010, pp.66-72 204-218.
[22] Muhammad,W.N.S, Abdullah, M.R., Ismail, S and Takim, R. Overview of Building
Information Modelling (BIM) Adoption factors for Construction Organizations. IOP
Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 140 ( 012107), 2018,pp.1-9
E.O. Ibem, U.O. Uwakonye, G.O. Akpoiroro, M. Somtochukwu and C.A. Oke
http://www.iaeme.com/IJCIET/index.asp 915 [email protected]
[23] Nadeem, A., Azhar, S., & Mok, J. Y. Building information modeling (BIM); A new
paradigm for visual interactive modelling and simulation for construction projects. Fifth
International Conference on Construction in the 21st Century, 2008, pp.435-446.
[24] Okoye, P.U. Ezeokonkwo, J.U, Ezeokoli. F. O. Factors Affecting the Adaptability of
Building Information Modelling (BIM) for Construction Projects in Anambra State
Nigeria. International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering Research, 4 (5), 2015,
pp. 671-691,
[25] Olugboyega, O. Building Information Modelling-Based Projects in Nigeria: Evidences
from Eko Atlantic City, PM World Journal, 5(10), 2016, pp. 1-14
[26] Olugboyega, O and Aina, O. O. Analysis of Building Information Modelling Usage
Indices and Facilitators in the Nigerian Construction Industry, Journal of Logistics,
Informatics and Service Sciences, 3(2), 2016, pp.1-36
[27] Olugboyega, O and Aina, O. O. Examination of the Levels of Development of Building
Information in the Nigerian Construction Industry,Journal of Construction Business and
Management, 2(2), 2018, pp.1-14
[28] Oluwatayo, A. A, Amole, D. Characteristics of global architecture firms. Engineering,
Construction and Architectural Management, 19(4), 2012, pp 393-405.
[29] Onungwa. I.O. Uduma-Olugu, N., and Igwe, J.M (2016). Building information modeling
in Nigeria and its impact on collaboration in schematic design stage and post contract
stage of design. WIT Transactions on The Built Environment , 169 , pp. 25-33
[30] Rogers E M. Diffusion of Innovations, 1995 The Fee Press New York: The Free Press, pp
204-251
[31] Succar, B.Building Information Modelling Framework: A Research and Delivery
Foundation for Industry Stakeholders. Automatio in Construction,18(3), 2009, pp. 357-
375
[32] Yamane, T., Statistics: An Introductory Analysis, 2nd Ed., New York: Harper and Row,
1967
[33] Yan, W., Culp, C and Graf, R. Integrating BIM and Gaming for real-time Interactive
Architectural Visualization. Automation in Construction, 20, 2011, pp. 446-454