building learner engagement - pearson india learner engagement september 2016 1 image by...
TRANSCRIPT
Building Learner
Engagement
September 20161
Image by Photographer’s Name (Credit in black type) or
Image by Photographer’s Name (Credit in white type)
Index
3 Introduction to the Survey
6 Summary of Findings
11 Detailed Findings
25 Annexures
25 I – State-level Snapshot
41 II – City-level Snapshot
51 III – Cities and Towns Covered
57 IV – Questionnaire
2
4
India’s Draft National Education Policy 2016:
Vision and Primary TenetsLearner engagement is a key enabler of outcomes and, therefore, ties closely to the vision of India’s National
Education Policy
Learning Outcomes and Student Engagement:
The Critical Linkage
The Draft National Education
Policy (NEP) envisions a
credible education system
capable of:
Ensuring inclusive quality
education
Lifelong learning
opportunities
Producing students
equipped with specified
learning outcomes
(knowledge, skills,
attitudes and values)
that are required to lead a
productive life.
Engaged Learner
Emotionally
Involved
Greater
efforts
More positive
emotions
Higher
attentiveness
Improved
Learning Outcomes
5
Introduction—Voice of Teacher Survey 2016
2,941; 45%
Female
3,553; 55%
Male
Higher Education
Schools
3,417; 53%
3,077; 47%
North
1,680; 26%
East
978; 15%
West
1,106; 17%
South
2,501; 38%
Central
229; 4%
6,494 teachers surveyed across 546 cities and towns
(teaching over 18,91,677 students)
Private Institutes
Government Institutes
4,287; 66%
2,207; 34%
The 4th edition of Pearson Voice of Teacher Survey aims to understand teachers’ perspective
on level of engagement among students and ways to enhance engagement
The partner for this survey is Spire Research and Consulting. Spire is a leader in strategic market research and consulting
with focus on customized, strategic research studies.
Profile of teachers surveyed…
Note: Survey administered between July and August 2016
42% teachers opine that values and ethics have
declined over the past five years
7
Snapshot—Voice of Teacher Survey 2016
Current Engagement among Learners1Parameters of Student Behavior with
Most Decline over Past 5 Years2
Note: An actively engaged learner is someone who proactively puts in effort to learn, asks questions and participates in activities in and outside the classroom
Learner engagement varies by level—61% at
schools and 50% at higher education institutions
42%teachers
Values
and ethics
38%teachers
Discipline
28%teachers
Attentiveness
in class
% of respondents holding this opinion
55%students
actively
engaged
45%students
not actively
engaged
8
Snapshot—Voice of Teacher Survey 2016
Top 3 Inhibitors to Learner Engagement13 Top 3 Enablers of Learner Engagement24
86% teachers consider use of real-life examples
and stories a highly useful technique to improve
engagement level
29% teachers consider excessive use of personal
gadgets a distraction and key inhibitor to learner
engagement
Lack of parental
support 12% teachers 83% teachersGroup discussions/
activities
Lack of interest in
subject/ career
stream9% teachers 81% teachers
Technology
platforms to
improve student-
teacher interaction
Note: 1Out of 12 inhibitors to engagement; 2Out of 14 enablers of engagement
Excessive use of
personal gadgets
as a distraction29% teachers 86% teachers
Real-life examples
and stories
9
Key Findings (1/2)
Level of
Learner
Engagement
Teachers believe that 55% of the students in India are actively engaged in
the learning process (45% not as engaged)
• Engagement is perceived to drop from school (61%) to higher
education level (50%)
– Learners in government schools are believed to be significantly
less engaged (51%) than those in private schools (67%). There is no
variation between higher education institutions.
At the state level, Tamil Nadu, Kerala, Haryana and Gujarat have student
engagement level below 50%
Trend of
Learner
Engagement
over Past
5 Years
Overall, 59% of teachers opine that learner engagement has increased in the
past 5 years
• This trend can be attributed more to changes at the school level (78%
teachers perceive improvement) than at higher education level (41% teachers)
Behaviourally, participation in activities (academic and extra-curricular) has
improved; however, there is a perceptible decline in values & ethics (42%
decline) and discipline (38% decline)
1
2
3
4
10
Key Findings (2/2)
Inhibitors to
Learner
Engagement
Excessive use of personal gadgets is considered a key inhibitor to learner
engagement; interestingly, teachers also consider use of technology platforms an
important enabler
• In government schools, lack of parental support is a much bigger
challenge
Further, only 49% of the respondents agree that 'teachers receive adequate
training to enhance learner engagement and inquisitiveness'
• Satisfaction with training support is much higher among school teachers
(70%) than higher education teachers (30%)
Enablers of
Learner
Engagement
Teachers consider use of real-life examples, group discussions and
technology platforms critical enablers of learner engagement
• However, teachers at government schools assign higher importance to
counselling sessions with students, teacher training and audio-visual
content for building engagement
12
Learner Engagement—Status and Trend (1/4)
Teachers: 55% learners are actively engaged—61% at school and 50% at higher education level. 59% teachers
perceive an improvement in learner engagement; 31% a decline and 10% teachers perceive no change
67%
51%
50%
50%
55%
~81% teachers learner engagement has
improved
Private Schools
~74% teachers learner engagement has
improved
Govt. Schools
~41% teachers learner engagement has
improved; 49% teachers declined
Private H.Ed.
Institutes
~41% teachers learner engagement has
improved; 46% teachers declined
Govt. H.Ed.
Institutes
~59% teachers learner engagement has
improved over the past 5 years
All-India
Current Engagement Level among Learners
Learners
Actively
Engaged
% of
Change in Learner Engagement over the Past 5 Years*
Govt. H.Ed. InstitutesGovt. Schools Private H.Ed. InstitutesPrivate SchoolsAll-India
Note: An actively engaged learner is someone who proactively puts in effort to learn, asks questions and participates in activities in and outside the classroom; *The
figures presented are based on a 5-point rating scale, where 1-Declined significantly and 5-Improved significantly. For analysis, rating scores of 4 and 5 have been
grouped into “improved”, and those of 1 and 2 into “declined”; Sample: All-India: 6,487; Government Schools: 1,185; Private Schools: 1,892; Government H.Ed.
Institutes: 1,019; Private H.Ed. Institutes: 2,391
13
Learner Engagement—Status and Trend (2/4)
Improvement in learner engagement over the past 5 years has been more pronounced at junior levels in schools.
In higher education institutes, teachers perceive a decline in engagement across levels.
Engagement Level among Learners (by Level) Change in Engagement over the Past 5 Years* (by Level)
% of learners engaged
Note: *The figures presented are based on a 5-point rating scale, where 1-Declined significantly and 5-Improved significantly. For analysis, rating scores of 4 and 5 have
been grouped into “improved”, and those of 1 and 2 into “declined”; Sample: Pre-primary: 199; Primary: 1,040; Secondary: 1,228; Senior Secondary: 560;
Undergraduate: 716; Postgraduate: 2,694
67%
63%
59%
61%
49%
51%
Pre-primary
Primary
Secondary
Senior Secondary
Undergraduate
Postgraduate
Pre-primary
Primary
Secondary
Senior Secondary
Undergraduate
Postgraduate
84% 14% 2%
83% 12% 5%
78% 12% 10%
71% 7% 22%
41% 12% 47%
41% 11% 48%
National average (55%) National average (59% improved)
DeclinedImproved No change
14
Learner Engagement—Status and Trend (3/4)
Learner engagement is the highest in Telangana (63%) and lowest in Haryana (48%).
Teachers in Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat and Kerala perceive a decline in student engagement in the past 5 years.
Current Engagement Level among Learners – By State*
Note: *States with a sample of 100 or above; Sample: Andhra Pradesh: 222; Bihar: 396; Gujarat: 242; Haryana: 130; Karnataka: 828; Kerala: 137; Madhya Pradesh:
145; Maharashtra: 842; NCT of Delhi: 411; Punjab: 126; Rajasthan: 149; Tamil Nadu: 663; Telangana: 629; Uttar Pradesh: 651; West Bengal: 408
63% 61%59% 58% 56% 56% 56%
53% 52% 52% 50% 49% 49% 48% 48%
Tela
ng
ana
Karn
ata
ka
Bih
ar
Utt
ar
Pra
desh
West B
eng
al
Ra
jasth
an
NC
T o
f D
elh
i
Ma
dhya P
rad
esh
Punja
b
Andh
ra P
radesh
Ma
hara
sh
tra
Guja
rat
Tam
il N
ad
u
Kera
la
Ha
ryan
a
National average (55%)
Trend
Improvement in learner
engagement in the past 5 years
Decline in learner engagement in
the past 5 years
No change
15
Learner Engagement—Status and Trend (4/4)
At the city level*, learner engagement is the highest in Hyderabad (64%); lowest in Chennai (46%). Engagement is
perceived to have improved across cities in the past five years, except in Mumbai.
Hyderabad
Lucknow
Bengaluru
Patna
Kolkata
Pune
NCT of Delhi
Mumbai
Chennai
64%
63%
60%
59%
58%
58%
56%
51%
46%
Note: *Cities with a sample of 100 or above; Sample: Bengaluru: 616; Chennai: 413; Hyderabad: 558; Kolkata: 242; Mumbai: 200; NCT of Delhi: 411; Pune: 270; Patna:
388; Lucknow: 388
Current Engagement Level among Learners – By Cities*
Improvement in learner
engagement in the past 5 years
Decline in learner engagement in
the past 5 years
No change
16
Behavioural Changes in Learner Engagement over the Past 5 Years
73%63% 62% 61% 60% 55% 54% 52%
43% 41%
15%
18% 15% 16% 17% 22% 17% 23%
19%17%
13%19% 23% 23% 23% 23% 28% 25%
38% 42%
Participationin
extra-curricularactivities
Collaborativelearning
Participationin class
discussions
Askingquestions
Proactivelyseeking helpfrom teachers
Attendance Attentivenessin class
Regularcompletion ofassignments
Discipline Values andethics
Improved No change Declined
Behavioural Changes in Learner Engagement
Improvement is observed on participation in activities (academic and extra-curricular) over the past five years; however,
teachers perceive most decline in values and ethics (42%) and discipline (38%).
Note: The figures presented are based on a 5-point rating scale, where 1-Declined significantly and 5-Improved significantly. For analysis, rating scores of 4 and 5 have
been grouped into “improved”, and those of 1 and 2 into “declined”; Sample: 6,494
Schools Higher Education Institutes
17
Inhibitors to Learner Engagement (1/3)
Educators (29%) view excessive use of personal gadgets as a distraction and major deterrent for learner engagement.
At the school level, lack of parental support (34%) is the top concern.
Lack of
interest in
subject/
career
stream
9%
Lack of
parental
support
12%
Excessive use
of personal
gadgets
as a
distraction
29%
Top 3 Reasons
for Low or
Declining
Learner
Engagement
1
2
3
Lack of parental support: 34%
Excessive use of personal gadgets
as a distraction: 16%
Too much pressure to perform: 10%
1
2
3
Excessive use of personal gadgets
as a distraction: 36%
Lack of interest in subject/ career
stream: 12%
Mismatch between formal education
and competitive exams: 11%
Note: The figures presented are based on most important reason cited by respondents who estimated current engagement as less than 50% or agreed that there had
been a decline in learner engagement in the past 5 years; Sample: All-India: 3,569; Schools: 1,233; H.Ed. Institutes: 2,336
18
Inhibitors to Learner Engagement (2/3)
Lack of parental support is a bigger concern at government schools (43%). Performance pressure at private schools is
also viewed as one of the key factors for low/ declining learner engagement (15%).
6%
7%
11%
13%
43%
15%
27%
2%
4%
24%
Government Schools Private Schools
Lack of
parental support
Lack of
parental support
Challenges faced outside
of school/ college
Past performance
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
Too much pressure to perform
Top 3 Reasons for Low or Declining Learner Engagement – by Types of Schools
Challenges faced outside
of school/ college
Past performance
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
Too much pressure to perform
Note: The figures presented are based on most important reason cited by respondents who estimated current engagement as less than 50% or agreed that there had
been a decline in learner engagement in the past 5 years; Sample: Government Schools: 655; Private Schools: 578
1
2
3
1
2
3
19
Inhibitors to Learner Engagement (3/3)
Excessive use of personal gadgets is viewed as a distraction across government and private higher education
institutions.
6%
9%
10%
14%
33%
6%
8%
12%
10%
38%
Government H.Ed. Institutes Private H.Ed. Institutes
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
Top 3 Reasons for Low or Declining Learner Engagement – by Types of Higher Education Institutions
Mismatch between formal education
and competitive examinations
Lack of interest in
subject/ career stream
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
Mismatch between formal education
and competitive examinations
Lack of interest in
subject/ career stream
Traditional teaching methodology
Lack of balance between academics
and extra-curricular activities
Traditional teaching methodology
Lack of balance between academics
and extra-curricular activities
Note: The figures presented are based on most important reason cited by respondents who estimated current engagement as less than 50% or agreed that there had
been a decline in learner engagement in the past 5 years; Sample: Government H.Ed. Institutes: 702; Private H.Ed. Institutes: 1,634
1
2
3
1
2
3
≠ ≠
20
Enablers of Learner Engagement (1/4)
Use of real-life examples (86%) and group discussions (83%) are considered the most useful techniques to improve
engagement.
Real-life
examples and
stories
Group
discussions/
activities
86%83%
81%80% 79% 79% 78% 77% 76% 76%
71%
65%63%
Technology
platforms to
improve student-
teacher
interaction
Better
assessment of
students'
interests
Regular
counselling
sessions with
students
Regular teacher
trainings
More audiovisual
content
Detailed feedback
on areas of
improvement
Field trips and
outdoor lessons
Smaller class
sizes
More hygienic
school/ college
premises
Higher
involvement of
parents
More extra-
curricular
activities
Useful Tools and Techniques to Improve Learner Engagement
Note: The figures presented are Top 2 box ratings (‘4-highly useful’ and ‘5-extremely useful’) on a scale of 1 to 5; Sample: 6,494
Government Schools Government Higher Education Institutes
Private Schools Private Higher Education Institutes
21
Enablers of Learner Engagement (2/4)
Regular counselling sessions with students and teacher trainings are considered more useful in government schools.
1
2
3
Regular counselling sessions
with students: 84%
Technology platforms to improve
student-teacher interaction: 84%
Regular teacher trainings/
More audio-visual content: 84%
1
2
3
Real-life examples and
stories: 81%
Group discussions/
activities: 78%
Better assessment of students'
interests: 74%
1 Real-life examples and stories:
86%1 Real-life examples and
stories: 91%
2 Group discussions/ activities:
80%2 Group discussions/
activities: 89%
3 Technology platforms to improve
student-teacher interaction: 78%3 More audio-visual
content: 88%
Note: The figures presented are Top 2 box ratings (‘4-highly useful’ and ‘5-extremely useful’) on a scale of 1 to 5; Sample: Government Schools: 1,185; Private Schools:
1,892; Government H.Ed. Institutes: 1,022; Private H.Ed. Institutes: 2,395
Top 3 Tools and Techniques to Improve Learner Engagement – by Type of Institution
22
Enablers of Learner Engagement (3/4)
49% agree that they receive adequate training to enhance learner engagement and inquisitiveness.
The perception of adequacy of teacher training is substantially lower at higher education level than that at school level.
agree
Higher Ed. Institutes
30%
Agreement with the Statement—"Teachers in India receive adequate training to enhance learner engagement
and inquisitiveness"
49%
15%
36%
Agree Neither agree nor disagree Disagree
All-India
agree
Schools
70%
Note: The figures presented are based on a 5-point rating scale, where 1-Strongly disagree and 5-Strongly agree. For analysis, rating scores of 4 and 5 have been
grouped into “Agree”, and those of 1 and 2 into “Disagree”; Sample: All-India: 6,464; Schools: 3,077; H.Ed. Institutes: 3,417
14% 16%70%
17% 53%30%
23
Enablers of Learner Engagement (4/4)
Most teachers opine that regular trainings on innovative teaching methodologies and new technology (esp. audio-visual
aids) would help them engage learners better.
Sample: All-India: 2,043
24
Pursuit of Career Stream according
to Choice and AbilityTeachers: 57% learners are able to pursue a career stream according to their choice and ability. Learners in government
schools least likely to be pursuing a career stream that complements their interests and abilities (42%).
Private
Schools
67%
Govt.
Schools
42%
Private
H.Ed.
Institutes
57%
Govt.
H.Ed.
Institutes
56%
Sample: All-India: 6,464; Government Schools: 1,184; Private Schools: 1,890; Government H.Ed. Institutes: 1,010; Private H.Ed. Institutes: 2,380
All-India
57%
% of Learners Pursuing Career Stream According to Choice and Ability – by Type of Institution
Reasons for Low/ Declining
EngagementChanges Observed in Past 5 Years
26
Teachers’ Perspective: Andhra Pradesh*
47%
8%
45%
Declined
Improved
No change
52%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
56%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
48%
50%
61%
Collaborativelearning
Participation inclass
discussions
Participation inextra-curricular
activities
Increase in… Decrease in…
43%
49%
61%
Attentiveness inclass
Discipline
Values andethics
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
(35%)
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
Real-lifeexamples
andstories
Groupdiscussions/
activities
Technologyplatforms to
improvestudent-teacher
interaction
78% 78% 74%
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 Years
47%
12%
41%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
Lack of interest in subject/
career stream (14%)
Mismatch between formal
education and competitive
exams (11%)≠
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *States with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 222
Reasons for Low/ Declining
EngagementChanges Observed in Past 5 Years
27
Teachers’ Perspective: Bihar*
89%
3%8%
Declined
Improved
No change
59%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
56%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
88%
89%
90%
Askingquestions
Attentivenessin class
Attendance
Increase in… Decrease in…
6%
7%
7%
RegularCompletion ofassignments
Discipline
Values andethics
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
Regularteachertrainings
Morehygienicschool/college
premises
Smallerclass sizes
90% 89% 89%
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 Years
79%
7%
14%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
Lack of parental support
(55%)
Too much pressure to
perform (9%)
Challenges faced outside
of school/ college (7%)
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *States with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 396
Reasons for Low/ Declining
EngagementChanges Observed in Past 5 Years
28
41%
11%
48%
Declined
Improved
No change
49%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
55%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
48%
53%
70%
Participation inclass
discussions
Collaborativelearning
Participation inextra-curricular
activities
Increase in… Decrease in…
44%
50%
53%
Attentiveness inclass
Discipline
Values andethics
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
Real-lifeexamples
and stories
Technologyplatforms to
improvestudent-teacher
interaction
Regular teacher trainings
88% 82% 81%
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 Years
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
33%
16%
52%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
Teachers’ Perspective: Gujarat*
Mismatch between formal
education and competitive
examination (13%)
Lack of interest in subject/
career stream(13%)
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
(29%)
≠
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *States with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 242
Reasons for Low/ Declining
EngagementChanges Observed in Past 5 Years
29
49%
2%
49%
Declined
Improved
No change
48%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
55%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
52%
52%
68%
Askingquestions
Proactivelyseeking helpfrom teachers
Participation inextra-curricular
activities
Increase in… Decrease in…
45%
58%
72%
Attentiveness inclass
Discipline
Values andethics
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
Real-lifeexamples
and stories
Groupdiscussions/
activities
Regular teacher trainings
86% 85% 85%
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 Years
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
21%
15%
64%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
Teachers’ Perspective: Haryana*
Traditional teaching
methodology (16%)
Mismatch between formal
education and competitive
examinations (13%)
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
(27%)
≠
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *States with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 130
Reasons for Low/ Declining
EngagementChanges Observed in Past 5 Years
30
78%
8%
14%
Declined
Improved
No change
61%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
60%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
76%
78%
81%
Participation inclass
discussions
Collaborativelearning
Participation inextra-curricular
activities
Increase in… Decrease in…
14%
23%
25%
Attentiveness inclass
Discipline
Values andethics
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
Groupdiscussions/
activities
Betterassessmentof students'
interests
Real-lifeexamples
and stories
88% 86% 85%
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 Years
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
64%
15%
21%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
Teachers’ Perspective: Karnataka*
Lack of interest in subject/
career stream (10%)
Challenges faced outside
of school/ college (9%)
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
(29%)
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *States with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 828
Reasons for Low/ Declining
EngagementChanges Observed in Past 5 Years
31
41%
14%
45%
Declined
Improved
No change
48%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
56%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
47%
57%
64%
Participation inclass
discussions
Collaborativelearning
Participation inextra-curricular
activities
Increase in… Decrease in…
39%
45%
55%
Askingquestions
Discipline
Values andethics
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
Real-lifeexamples
and stories
Groupdiscussions/ activities
Betterassessmentof students'
interests
85% 81% 80%
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 Years
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
30%
14%
56%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
Teachers’ Perspective: Kerala*
Lack of interest in subject/
career stream (12%)
Traditional teaching
methodology (12%)
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
(37%)
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *States with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 137
Reasons for Low/ Declining
EngagementChanges Observed in Past 5 Years
32
43%
9%
48%
Declined
Improved
No change
53%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
57%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
53%
54%
69%
Askingquestions
Collaborativelearning
Participation inextra-curricular
activities
Increase in… Decrease in…
46%
57%
59%
Regularcompletion ofassignments
Discipline
Values andethics
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
Real-lifeexamples
and stories
Groupdiscussions/
activities
Regularteachertrainings
88% 81% 76%
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 Years
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
39%
15%
46%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
Teachers’ Perspective: Madhya Pradesh*
Lack of interest in subject/
career stream (15%)
Mismatch between formal
education and competitive
examinations (11%)
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
(36%)
≠
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *States with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 145
Reasons for Low/ Declining
Engagement
33
50%
14%
36%
Declined
Improved
No change
50%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
57%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
58%
62%
74%
Participation inclass
discussions
Collaborativelearning
Participation inextra-curricular
activities
32%
41%
44%
Attentivenessin class
Discipline
Values andethics
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
Real-lifeexamples
and stories
Technology platforms to
improvestudent-teacher
interaction
Regularteachertrainings
85% 79% 76%
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 Years
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
44%
14%
42%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
Changes Observed in Past 5 Years
Teachers’ Perspective: Maharashtra*
Challenges faced outside
of school/ college (9%)
Too much pressure to
perform (8%)
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
(29%)
Increase in…
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *States with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 842
Decrease in…
Reasons for Low/ Declining
Engagement
34
Teachers’ Perspective: NCT of Delhi*
50%
20%
30%
Declined
Improved
No change
56%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
52%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
57%
58%
69%
Askingquestions
Participation inclass
discussions
Participation inextra-curricular
activities
30%
36%
46%
Attentivenessin class
Discipline
Values andethics
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
Groupdiscussions/
activities
Real-lifeexamples
and stories
Regularcounselling
sessionswith
students
87% 85% 82%
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 Years
40%
20%
40%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
Changes Observed in Past 5 Years
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
Lack of parental support
(15%)
Mismatch between formal
education and competitive
examinations (11%)
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
(33%)
≠
Increase in…
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *States with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 411
Decrease in…
Changes Observed in Past 5 Years
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
Reasons for Low/ Declining
Engagement
35
Teachers’ Perspective: Punjab*
48%
8%
44%
Declined
Improved
No change
52%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
56%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
50%
52%
57%
Proactivelyseeking helpfrom teachers
Collaborativelearning
Participation inextra-curricular
activities
41%
52%
63%
Attentiveness inclass
Discipline
Values andethics
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 Years
29%
10%
60%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
Lack of interest in subject/
career stream (12%)
Mismatch between formal
education and competitive
examinations (11%)
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
(45%)
≠
Increase in…
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *States with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 126
Decrease in…
Real-lifeexamples
and stories
Groupdiscussions/
activities
Regularteachertrainings
89% 87% 85%
Changes Observed in Past 5 Years
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
Reasons for Low/ Declining
Engagement
36
Teachers’ Perspective: Rajasthan*
50%
10%
40%
Declined
Improved
No change
56%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
60%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
54%
58%
70%
Proactivelyseeking helpfrom teachers
Collaborativelearning
Participation inextra-curricular
activities
39%
47%
54%
Attendance
Discipline
Values andethics
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
Real-lifeexamples
and stories
Groupdiscussions/
activities
Regularteachertrainings
88% 87% 81%
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 Years
38%
14%
48%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
Mismatch between formal
education and competitive
examinations (15%)
Lack of interest in subject/
career stream (14%)
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
(36%)
≠
Increase in…
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *States with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 149
Decrease in…
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
Reasons for Low/ Declining
Engagement
37
Teachers’ Perspective: Tamil Nadu*
46%
15%
39%
Declined
Improved
No change
49%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
48%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
46%
52%
58%
Participation inclass
discussions
Collaborativelearning
Participation inextra-curricular
activities
36%
47%
47%
Attentivenessin class
Discipline
Values andethics
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
Real-lifeexamples
and stories
Technologyplatforms to
improvestudent-teacher
interaction
Groupdiscussions/
activities
83% 82% 80%
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 Years
48%
21%
31%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
Changes Observed in Past 5 Years
Lack of parental support
(14%)
Lack of interest in subject/
career stream (9%)
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
(32%)
Increase in…
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *States with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 663
Decrease in…
Changes Observed in Past 5 Years
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
Reasons for Low/ Declining
Engagement
38
Teachers’ Perspective: Telangana*
69%10%
21%
Declined
Improved
No change
63%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
63%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
76%
78%
84%
Participation inclass
discussions
Askingquestions
Participation inextra-curricular
activities
24%
39%
41%
Regularcompletion ofassignments
Discipline
Values andethics
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 Years
63%
14%
23%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
Lack of parental support
(28%)
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
(22%)
Lack of interest in subject/
career stream (12%)
Increase in…
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *States with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 629
Decrease in…
Real-lifeexamples
and stories
Technologyplatforms to
improvestudent-teacher
interaction
Regularcounselling
sessionswith
students
90% 88% 86%
Changes Observed in Past 5 Years
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
Reasons for Low/ Declining
Engagement
39
Teachers’ Perspective: Uttar Pradesh*
59%
8%
33%
Declined
Improved
No change
58%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
56%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
62%
63%
75%
Collaborativelearning
Participation inclass
discussions
Participation inextra-curricular
activities
29%
34%
40%
Attentiveness inclass
Discipline
Values andethics
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
(26%)
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 Years
49%
14%
37%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
Lack of parental support
(23%)
Mismatch between formal
education and competitive
examinations (10%)
Real-lifeexamples
and stories
Technologyplatforms to
improvestudent-teacher
interaction
Groupdiscussions/ activities
89% 83% 82%
≠
Increase in…
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *States with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 651
Decrease in…
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
Changes Observed in Past 5 YearsReasons for Low/ Declining
Engagement
40
Teachers’ Perspective: West Bengal*
58%
11%
31%
Declined
Improved
No change
56%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
61%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
61%
61%
69%
Askingquestions
Participation inclass
discussions
Participation inextra-curricular
activities
Decrease in…
27%
35%
47%
Attentivenessin class
Discipline
Values andethics
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
(34%)
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
Real-lifeexamples
and stories
Groupdiscussions/
activities
Regularcounselling
sessionswith
students
84% 82% 80%
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 Years
46%
16%
38%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
Mismatch between formal
education and competitive
examinations (9%)
Traditional teaching
methodology (10%)
≠
Increase in…
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *States with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 408
68%
13%
19%
Reasons for low/ declining
engagementChanges Observed in Past 5 Years
42
Teachers’ Perspective: Bengaluru*
81%
7%
12%
Declined
Improved
No change
60%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
58%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
78%
81%
83%
Participation inclass
discussions
Collaborativelearning
Participation inextra-curricular
activities
Increase in… Decrease in…
11%
20%
22%
Attentiveness inclass
Discipline
Values andethics
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
(27%)
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
Groupdiscussions/activities
Betterassessment of students'
interests
Real-lifeexamples
andstories
89% 86% 82%
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 Years
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
Challenges faced outside
of school/ college (12%)
Too much pressure to
perform (10%)
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *Cities with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 616
Reasons for low/ declining
engagementChanges Observed in Past 5 Years
43
Teachers’ Perspective: Chennai*
48%
18%
34%
Declined
Improved
No change
46%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
44%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
45%
49%
56%
Askingquestions
Collaborativelearning
Participation inextra-curricular
activities
Increase in… Decrease in…
34%
43%
46%
Attentivenessin class
Values andethics
Discipline
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
(28%)
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
Technologyplatforms to
improvestudent-teacher
interaction
Real-lifeexamples
andstories
Betterassessment of students'
interests
83% 80% 79%
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 YearsAdequacy of Teacher
Training
51%
22%
27%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
Challenges faced outside
of school/ college (7%)
Lack of parental support
(20%)
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide ; *Cities with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 414
Real-lifeexamples
and stories
Technologyplatforms to
improvestudent-teacher
interaction
Regularcounselling
sessionswith
students
Reasons for low/ declining
engagementChanges Observed in Past 5 Years
44
Teachers’ Perspective: Hyderabad*
69%9%
22%
Declined
Improved
No change
64%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
65%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
77%
78%
85%
Participation inclass
discussions
Askingquestions
Participation inextra-curricular
activities
Increase in… Decrease in…
24%
40%
42%
Regularcompletion ofassignments
Discipline
Values andethics
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
(25%)
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 Years
64%
15%
21%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
90% 88% 86%
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
Lack of parental support
(22%)
Lack of interest in subject/
career stream (14%)
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *Cities with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 558
Reasons for low/ declining
engagementChanges Observed in Past 5 Years
45
Teachers’ Perspective: Kolkata*
62%
11%
27%
Declined
Improved
No change
58%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
64%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
65%
64%
72%
Participation inclass
discussions
Askingquestions
Participation inextra-curricular
activities
Increase in… Decrease in…
28%
35%
49%
Attendance
Discipline
Values andethics
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
(38%)
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 Years
46%
16%
38%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
Real-lifeexamples
andstories
Groupdiscussions/
activities
Regularcounselling
sessionswith
students
86% 84% 81%
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
Traditional teaching
methodology (10%)
Mismatch between formal
education and competitive
examinations (11%)≠
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *Cities with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 243
Reasons for low/ declining
engagementChanges Observed in Past 5 Years
46
Teachers’ Perspective: Mumbai*
39%
15%
47%
Declined
Improved
No change
51%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
56%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
49%
57%
73%
Participation inclass
discussions
Collaborativelearning
Participation inextra-curricular
activities
Increase in… Decrease in…
43%
47%
51%
Attentivenessin class
Discipline
Values andethics
Traditional teaching
methodology (11%)
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
(28%)
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 Years
33%
19%
48%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
Real-lifeexamples
andstories
Technologyplatforms to
improvestudent-teacher
interaction
Smallerclasssizes
84% 79% 78%
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
Lack of parental support
(12%)
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *Cities with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 200
Reasons for low/ declining
engagementChanges Observed in Past 5 Years
47
Teachers’ Perspective: NCT of Delhi*
50%
20%
30%
Declined
Improved
No change
56%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
52%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
57%
58%
69%
Askingquestions
Participation inclass
discussions
Participation inextra-curricular
activities
Increase in… Decrease in…
30%
36%
46%
Attentivenessin class
Discipline
Values andethics
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
(33%)
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 Years
40%
20%
40%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
Groupdiscussions/
activities
Real-lifeexamples
andstories
Regularcounselling
sessionswith
students
87% 85% 82%
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
Lack of parental support
(15%)
Mismatch between formal
education and competitive
examinations (11%)≠
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *Cities with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 412
Real-lifeexamples
andstories
Groupdiscussions/
activities
Moreaudio-visual
content
Reasons for low/ declining
engagementChanges Observed in Past 5 Years
48
Teachers’ Perspective: Pune*
58%
9%
33%
Declined
Improved
No change
58%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
65%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
67%
69%
82%
Participation inclass
discussions
Collaborativelearning
Participation inextra-curricular
activities
Increase in… Decrease in…
31%
44%
45%
Attentivenessin class
Discipline
Values andethics
Lack of balance between
academics and extra-
curricular activities (9%)
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
(40%)
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 Years
41%
15%
44%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
91% 86% 84%
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
Lack of interest in subject/
career stream (11%)
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *Cities with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 270
Reasons for low/ declining
engagementChanges Observed in Past 5 Years
49
Teachers’ Perspective: Patna*
90%
3%7%
Declined
Improved
No change
59%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
56%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
89%
89%
90%
Proactivelyseeking helpfrom teachers
Attentivenessin class
Attendance
Increase in… Decrease in…
5%
6%
7%
Participationin class
discussions
Values andethics
Discipline
Lack of parental support
(56%)
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 Years
80%
7%
13%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
Challenges faced outside
of school/ college (8%)
Too much pressure to
perform (8%)
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *Cities with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 388
Regularteachertrainings
Morehygienicschool/college
premises
Smallerclass sizes
90% 89% 89%
Reasons for low/ declining
engagementChanges Observed in Past 5 Years
50
Teachers’ Perspective: Lucknow*
75%
7%
18%
Declined
Improved
No change
63%
Actively
engaged
learners
% of Students Pursuing a
Stream of Choice/ Ability
54%
Pursuing a career
stream according to
choice/ ability
72%
73%
79%
Collaborativelearning
Askingquestions
Participation inextra-curricular
activities
Increase in… Decrease in…
16%
17%
21%
Attentivenessin class
Discipline
Values andethics
Tools and Techniques to
Improve Learner Engagement
% of Learners EngagedChange in Learner
Engagement in Past 5 Years
63%
12%
25%
Disagree
Agree
Neutral
Lack of parental support
(48%)
Excessive use of personal
gadgets as a distraction
(12%)
Adequacy of Teacher
Training
Too much pressure to
perform (10%)
Note: Sample size varies slightly across questions analyzed on this slide; *Cities with sample of over 100 teachers; Sample: 388
Real-lifeexamples
andstories
Technologyplatforms to
improvestudent-teacher
interaction
Groupdiscussions/ activities
90% 87% 85%
52
List of Cities and Towns Covered [1]
Andhra
PradeshKakinada Podalada Visakhapatnam Hajipur Daman and Diu Ankleshwar
Amalapuram Kovvur Proddutur Vizianagaram Munger Daman Atul
Anantapur Kurnool PuttaparthiArunachal
PradeshMuzaffarpur Goa Bakrol
Angalakuduru Lepakshi Rajahmundry Itanagar Patna Cuncolim Bardoli
Bapatla Machilipatnam Rajam Assam Samastipur Farmagudi Bharuch
Bhimavaram Madanapalle Rajampet Dibrugarh Chandigarh Mapusa Bhavnagar
Bobbili Mangalagiri Rayachoti Guwahati Chandigarh Margao Bhilad
Chilakaluripet Nandikotkur Sattenapalle Jorhat Chhattisgarh Nuvem Chaparda
Chirala Nandyal Srikakulam Kokrajhar Bhilai Panjim Dabhoi
Eluru Narasaraopet Srikalahasti Mirza Bilaspur Ponda Dholka
Gudivada Narsapur Sullurpet Nagarbera Durg Taleigao Gandhinagar
Gudur Nellore Tadepalligudem Silchar Jagdalpur Zuarinagar Godhra
Guntur Ongole Tenali Tezpur Kawardha Gujarat Himatnagar
Hanuman
JunctionPalakollu Tirupati Tinsukia Raipur Adipur Jamnagar
Hindupur Piduguralla Velivennu BiharDadra and
Nagar HaveliAhmedabad Junagadh
Kadapa Piridi Vijayawada Gaya Silvassa Anand Kherva
53
List of Cities and Towns Covered [2]
Gujarat (contd.) Visnagar Panipat Theog Karnataka Mandya Kannur
Mehsana Haryana RewariJammu and
KashmirAnkola Mangaluru Kasaragod
Mithapur Ambala Rohtak Anantnag Bagalkot Manipal Kochi
Morbi Bahadurgarh Sirsa Jammu Bantwal Mysuru Kollam
Nadiad Ellenabad Sonipat Kathua Belagavi Nitte Koodali
Navsari FaridabadHimachal
PradeshKatra Bellary Raichur Kothamangalam
Palanpur Gharaunda Barotiwala Srinagar Bengaluru Ramanagara Kottayam
Palitana Gurugram Dharamsala Jharkhand Dandeli Shivamogga Kozhikode
Patan Hisar Hamirpur Bokaro Steel City Davangere Sullia Palakkad
Petlad Jagadhri Mandi Deoghar Dharwad Tumakuru Panthavoor
Rajkot Kaithal Nurpur Dhanbad Gadag-Betageri Kerala Pathanamthitta
Surat Karnal Palampur Ghatshila Gokak Adoor Payyampally
Surendranagar Kurukshetra Pathiar Jamshedpur Hassan Amritapuri Pulpally
Vadodara Milakpur Shimla Mesra Hubballi Cheranalloor Puthiyathura
Vallabh
VidyanagarMurthal Sirmour Ranchi Huvina Hadagali Ernakulam Ranni
Vapi Palwal Solan Sahibganj Kalaburagi Kadannappally Thalassery
Vasad Panchkula Sundar Nagar Sindri Kinnigoli Kanjirappally Thiruvananthapuram
54
List of Cities and Towns Covered [3]
Kerala
(contd.)Mandleshwar Aurangabad Karad Pune Yavatmal Cuttack Faridkot
Thrissur Mandsaur Ballarpur Kirloskarwadi Sangamner Manipur Jeypore Fazilka
Tiruvalla Ratlam Baramati Kolhapur Sangli Imphal Kantabanji Ferozepur
Vazhakulam Rewa Bhusawal Kopargaon Satara Senapati Muniguda Giddarbaha
Madhya
PradeshSagar Budhgaon Kurul Selgaon Meghalaya Rambhadeipur Gurdaspur
Anuppur Satna Chandrapur Lonavala Shirpur Shillong Rourkela Hariana
Betul Sehore Chinchwad Malegaon Shirwal Mizoram Sambalpur Hoshiarpur
Bhopal Ujjain Dehu Road Mumbai Silapur Aizawl Sarang Jagraon
Burhanpur Vidisha Dhule Nagpur Solapur Nagaland Puducherry Jalandhar
Guna Maharashtra Digras NalasoparaTalegaon
DabhadeDimapur Karaikal Khanna
Gwalior Ahmednagar Dombivli Nashik Tarapur Delhi Puducherry Lehragaga
IndoreAitwade
BudrukGadchiroli Navi Mumbai Thane NCT of Delhi Punjab Longowal
Jabalpur Alandi Hadapsar Palghar Urun Islampur Odisha Amritsar Ludhiana
Katni Ambajogai Ichalkaranji Panvel Vasai BaharampurAnandpur
SahibMajitha
Khargone Amravati Islampur Pophali Vasai-Virar Bhubaneswar Banga Malout
Manawar Atigre Jalgaon Pulgaon Wardha Bolani Bathinda Moga
55
List of Cities and Towns Covered [4]
Punjab (contd.) Bikaner Sri Ganganagar Dindigul Nullivilai Thiruvallur Chintapatla
Mohali Falna Udaipur Erode Ooty Thiruvarur Ghatkesar
Nawanshahr Hanumangarh Sikkim Hosur Panruti Thuvakudi Hanamkonda
Pakka Kalan Jaipur Gangtok Kanchipuram Perambalur Tiruchirappalli Hayath Nagar
Pathankot Jaisalmer Mazitar Kanyakumari Periyapuliyur Tirunelveli Huzurabad
Patiala Jhalawar Namchi Kattankulathur Pollachi Tiruppattur Hyderabad
Phagwara Jodhpur Tamil Nadu Kilakarai Pudukkottai Tirupur Jagtial
Rajpura Kankroli Ambur Kovilpatti Rajapalayam Tiruvannamalai Karimnagar
Rupnagar Kishangarh Brammapuram Krishnagiri Salem Trichy Khammam
Sangrur Kota Chengalpattu Kumbakonam Sathyamangalam Tuticorin Kothapet
Rajasthan Laxmangarh Chennai Madurai Sattur Vellore Malakpet
Abu Road Makrana Chidambaram Mayiladuthurai Selaiyur Villupuram Peerzadiguda
Ajmer Newai Chinnasalem Melmaruvathur Sivakasi Telangana Ramachandrapuram
Alwar Pali Coimbatore Nagercoil Sriperumbudur Adilabad Ramanthapur
Banasthali Pilani Cuddalore Namakkal Srivilliputhur Boduppal Saroornagar
Bhilwara Sikar Dharmapuri Neyveli Thanjavur Cherlagudem Secunderabad
56
List of Cities and Towns Covered [5]
Telangana
(contd.)Barabanki Mathura Bhimtal Bally Hooghly Mecheda
Suryapet Bareilly Meerut Dehradun Bandel Howrah Memari
Vanasthalipuram Bijnor Modinagar Dwarahat Bankura Jalpaiguri Midnapore
Wanaparthy Bulandshahar Moradabad Haldwani Barasat Kalyani Mohanpur
Warangal Chandauli Moth Haridwar Bardhaman Kanaipur Murshidabad
Zahirabad Etah Muradnagar Kashipur Bishrail Kanchrapara Naihati
Tripura Faizabad Muzaffarnagar Kotdwar Bolpur KandiNorth 24
Parganas
Agartala Ghaziabad Noida Nainital Chakdaha Kankinara Purulia
Dharmanagar Gorakhpur Raebareli Pantnagar Chinsurah Kharagpur Ranaghat
Uttar Pradesh Greater Noida Saharanpur Rishikesh Darjeeling Khardaha Santiniketan
Agra Jaunpur Shamli RoorkeeDiamond
HarbourKolaghat Serampore
Aligarh Jhansi Sitapur Srinagar Domjur Kolkata Shyamnagar
Allahabad Kajari Sultanpur Tehri Durgapur Krishnanagar Siliguri
Anoopshahr Kanpur Varanasi West Bengal Haldia MadhyamgramSouth 24
Parganas
Auraiya Lucknow Uttarakhand Asansol Halisahar Malda Suri
Bahraich Mahoba Almora Baharampur Hindmotor Mankundu Tamluk
61
Research Partner
Spire Research and Consulting is a leading strategic market research consultancy specializing in global emerging
markets - the Asia-Pacific, Latin America, Middle East, Africa and Russia/CIS. Spire focuses on holistic research
projects which integrate traditional customer research with knowledge of the broader business eco-system. Through
its growth-focused solution portfolio, Spire Research and Consulting helps its clients with strategic decision-making
for market growth and entry. Spire’s management team works through its eight country offices, international advisors
and local associates in over 30 countries to bring to each project the highest standards of research conceptualization,
execution and delivery. The Spire Group has delivered over 1,000 market research and consulting projects for over
50 Global Fortune 1000 firms. Recently, Yamada Business Consulting acquired an 80 per cent stake in the Spire
Research and Consulting group. This acquisition gives Spire access to YBC’s extensive network of 5 offices and over
400 consultants in Japan to conduct research and advise clients on Japan market entry and growth.