building teamwork · building teamwork term definition introduced in forms a system for formulating...
TRANSCRIPT
Building Teamwork
Term Definition Introduced In
FORMSA system for formulating and evaluating feedback to ensure that it's effective; the letters stand for Factual, Observable, Responsive, Measurable, and Specific Module 4
Groupthink An idea that says people are most comfortable agreeing with the majority Module 2Influencer A member of a team who uses their influence with another member to silently voice their opinion Module 1
MilestonesA list of important, specific steps along the project path that shows which goals within the project have been met and indicate places where further planning and evaluations may be necessary Module 1
SMART criteriaA set of criteria applied to an improvement plan to be sure it will be effective; the letters stand for Specific, Measurable, Align, Realistic, and Time Module 1
Synergy Two or more things coming together to produce a result not otherwise obtainable Module 3
Page 1
BUILDING TEAMWORK MODULE ONE – ESTABLISHING THE GROUND RULES Male: Module One. Establishing the Ground Rules. There's 10 ground rules
that need to be addressed before the team begins working on their
project. Let's look at the first one.
Clarity and Team Goals. Want to have a clear and specific goal in mind
before we even start work on the project, otherwise, one person will be
doing one thing, another person will be doing another thing, and there's
just no way that the team can work together without a clarity and team
goals. To understand, you want everybody on the team to understand
that what are you looking at, what's the problem you're looking at, and
kind of scope out the problem and define it.
You want to have a good idea of who the member of the team are going to
be, what type of resources are you going to have to tap into and to look at
while we're addressing this problem.
While we're defining our problem, what are we looking at; is this problem,
is this something we can work at, is this a workable size? Is this
something that this team with these members can really address.
Another thing you want to look at, particularly as a team leader, what's the
big picture? How does this problem or this project that we're working on,
how does it fit into the big picture?
You also want to look at -- with clarity and team goals, you ought to want
to look at what's a good idea of what the team goals are, that you'll be
able to head off switches in direction. I know we've all been in meetings
Page 2
before where we're talking about one subject and someone goes off on a
tangent. So a clarity and teams goals will allow you to get the discussion
back on track, toward what the project is, and what your final goal is.
Also we want to look at milestones. What steps do we want to take in
completion of this project, where do we want to be at this time or where do
we want to be at this time? And map out the milestones as far as solving
the problem. And that gives us an idea and some evidence of when
somebody looks at it and asks us where we're going, what's this team
doing or how are they coming. But we can take out this list of milestones.
It may be something you want to even graph and say here's what we've
done and here's what we're heading toward, here's how it fits in.
The second thing we want to look at in establishing ground rules is an
improvement plan. We know what our problem is. Now how do we plan
to get there.
And I like to use the SMART criteria, that's S-M-A-R-T, and that's an
acronym that stands for these particular words. And you want to have
these characteristics in your improvement plan. You want it to be specific.
Here's what we're going to do and here's where we plan to be. And
measureable. You want it to be particularly measureable. You don't want
something vague. You want to be able to say, okay, we said we were
going to reduce spending by 15 percent and here's our measure where
we're at now, something we can measure ourselves against, our progress
against.
Page 3
You want A, align. You want to make sure that you're able to align this
with the organizational goals, that you are not going off in a direction that
is maybe unattainable. Or you want it to be realistic. Want to be able to
look at it and say we might not be at that point now but we can see what it
would take to get there, and it's realistic, it's not some pie in the sky.
And T, you want it to be time based. By doing this improvement plan, we
expect to reduce spending by 15 percent by the end of this year.
So using all that criteria, you should have a good, firm improvement plan
as far as which way you want to go and able to measure your progress
against your improvement plan.
The third thing we want to look at is clearly defined roles. You want them
to be specific and within timeframes. Each person brings a different talent
to the table as far as teamwork. And you want them to be specific, who is
going to do what, who's responsible for what. And you want say they're
going to do this and within what timeframe.
Several roles you might want to take a look at is timekeeper. If we're
going to discuss this for 10 minutes then we need somebody in the
meetings to time how long we've discussed it.
Also want to have a gate keeper, someone who takes the issues that may
be are on the agenda or not on the agenda and bring that up.
One thing before -- it's important that you have, before a meeting starts, is
an agenda. Whoever is responsible for that. What things are we going to
talk about and for how long we going to talk about them, rather than
Page 4
getting in a meeting and it's a free for all with several different people
talking about their favorite item for an indeterminate amount of time. You
need an agenda before you start, before you even come to the table.
Talk about, as far as defined rules, backups, it somebody gets sick, who's
going to take their place or who's going to be responsible for it if they're,
for instance, lost for a certain amount of time to the team.
The thing also want to be aware of is pecking order, that when you assign
roles, there may be some establish people, there may be some new
people on the team, and how does pecking order come into it, and how
are those roles declared.
Fourth thing we want to look at is clear communication. You always want
to be clear and direct about when you're speaking with each other. Some
people have the idea, just give me the bullet points, that's all I want to
hear. Other people require more detail. So be aware of their
communication and communication style.
Listen actively. Don't interrupt, and make sure there's no interruptions.
Another thing you want to look at, when somebody is discussing
something with the team is other people have speaking styles, some
speak fast and a mile a minute, other people speak slow. So be aware of
that and adapt yourself to their speaking styles.
One thing also you want to make sure that you touch on and nip in the bud
immediately; no bullying statements, no discounting somebody else's
Page 5
opinion. It's essential that all members are included and their opinions are
respected. So nip that type of behavior in the bud.
Which brings us to nu8mber five, beneficial team behavior. You want to
initiate discussion. You want to solicit opinion. You don't want to go back
over something that you've spent the last 15 minutes discussing.
Somebody needs to be in control of that, and raise the question that we've
already discussed that, let's move on.
Want to step in to ease any tension that might arise or you might see
arising. Let's just take five minutes and cool off and come back to the
table after our break.
There's also a concept called a parking lot, where you can take issues that
are not on the agenda that somebody raises and that maybe everybody's
not prepared to discuss and say, well, let's put that on the agenda for our
next meeting, and let's move on to the next item on the agenda. So that's
one way to get through that barrier.
Number six is a well defined decision procedure. How are you going to
make decisions? Are we going for unanimity? Are we going for
consensus? What one thing you want to be on top of is don't make any
decisions based on opinion. Use data to make decisions. What data do
you bring? What is your position on this issue? What data do you have to
back it up? Not that I feel that this will be the best way. Know what data
do you have to back that opinion up. And don't present one, if you haven't
done your research.
Page 6
A lot of times in discussions, silence is assumed to mean consent. And
you want to address that as a team leader or as a team member. I
understand, I see that you're sitting there and you have not contributed
anything to the discussion. Does your silence mean that you agree? And
confront somebody that hasn't brought up any issues as far as how they
feel about the motion on the table.
Number seven, balance participation. You want all the team members to
participate. You want to be aware of people who may have influence with
others and are using that influence to silence maybe their disagreement
with the position. You want to have -- nothing will change if everybody is
comfortable. So you want to have an environment where all members feel
free to present their opinions and the reasons behind their opinions, and
whatever side of the opinion they are on.
Number eight, you want to have established ground rules. This allows
open discussions and allows a framework for you, or for the discussion, to
take the position without fear of repercussion. You don't want people
bringing up irrelevant information. Don't want them talking about their dog
when we're talking about something else. You don't want them to veer off
on a tangent. And it's the responsibility of all other members of the group
to bring them back to the table and to keep them on task.
You also -- it's in your benefit to -- once you've established these ground
rules, preferably at the first meeting, to write them down and make sure
everybody has a copy so you can refer to these written rules. This is how
Page 7
we've decided that we're going to conduct our business and these are the
rules we'll live by. This is our framework.
And you also want to have rules in there about what behavior and how
decent will be approached, that some people would have a discussion that
swear words will be prohibited because it offends other people in the
discussion. I've seen other negotiating teams where swear words were
widely accepted and no communication could take place without swear
words. So make sure that's written in your groundwork as well, written
rules of behavior and discussion.
Number nine, awareness of the group process. Seven percent of the
things you learn will be verbal, but the rest will be nonverbal. Be aware of
nonverbal clues like eye rolling, or turning your back, or getting up and
moving around. You want to make sure that everybody is listening to
everybody, as far as their participation, and that nobody is being
discounted, their opinions are being discounted. You want to have a clear
understanding of that.
And number 10, use of problem solving and decision making approaches.
There's several different ways to reach a decision, and to approach it, you
want to make sure that it's understood by all members of the team just
exactly what you're going to use.
Demand data and facts. Not just opinions, but demand data as far as
someone's position on an item.
Page 8
Make sure you've investigated root causes; why is this situation the way it
is. And look at permanent solutions, not quick fixes. You want to make
sure that as the discussion of the issue, that no opinions are presented,
that it's strictly based on fact.
So if you use these 10 guidelines as far as laying down the groundwork
before you even begin work, that you'll be well on your way to a successful
discussion of the issues, and perhaps a very good chance of finding a
successful solution.
{End of recording.}
Page 1
BUILDING TEAMWORK MODULE TWO – COMMUNICATION Male: Module Two. Communication. As a team leader or even as a team
member, you want to create an environment of open communication and
curb group think. When we talk about group think, that's an idea or a
concept that it says that people will rush to judgment or they are the most
comfortable position is agreeing with the majority. So a lot of times in
discussions of a problem or things of that nature, people will agree to
agree and they won't have to argue anymore, which doesn't give you
perhaps the best solution. We'll talk about this later on in our webinar.
But you want to make sure that everybody's voice is heard and people
aren't bullying people to agree with them. That often leads to the worst
decision of the group. One of the ways we can avoid this, perhaps as a
team leader or a team member as well, is don't flaunt your authority. If
you have authority over somebody, don't discount their opinion and make
fun of them or dismiss them even by rolling your eyes or walking around.
Let them be heard, cause they may have the solution to the problem and it
may be the most innovative one that you've ever heard. And if they're not
allowed to speak, then that knowledge and skill and creativity will be lost.
Match your voice and volume to that of other team members. If
somebody's speaking softly, then speak softly along with them. Don't try
to over talk them or talk faster, or slower.
A lot of times I've been in meetings where people thought that the faster
they talk made them the most right, whoever talk fastest has the solution.
Page 2
And that's just not the case. I often looked at it that if you're speaking fast,
then you're trying to cover up your inefficiencies. So be aware of that.
Encourage others to develop their ideas. You want to have an open forum
that they can feel free to, and are comfortable in, discussing their opinions.
I think that -- you don't have to agree with them, but they were, I think that,
well, I see what you're saying but here's the way I think and why.
And present facts, like we've said earlier. Here is why I think that. Here,
I've done this research and here's what I found.
Match your style to that of other team members. Like we said before, if
they're speaking softly, speak softly. If they're speaking loudly, try to keep
the noise down, but you know what I mean as far as match their style. Try
not to get away or even call people, if they're -- like I mentioned earlier,
people speaking fast to try to get their opinion heard and with the idea that
they're the most right -- call them on it, that, hey, you know, slow down a
little bit so we all can understand and we all can figure out what you're
trying to say. And try to slow them down if they're speaking fast, cause
I've heard people talk a hundred miles an hour. And it was more of a
bullying tactic than anything else.
When you're presenting your opinion, want to use persuasive
communication techniques, like be concise, don't ramble, but present your
opinion, present your back-up information as to why that's your opinion,
why you think this is the best way, or if you're talking, if you are
disagreeing with somebody, here's why I don't think your opinion is right
Page 3
and here's the facts and data that I have to back up my opinion that it's not
right.
Use images. A lot of us -- there's three different ways that we learn things,
and they're visual, and that's reading or pictures, or people writing notes,
or things of that nature. Then there's also the auditory where they listen
and they learn by listening. And the last one is kinesthetic where it's a
hands on approach, where these are the people that take apart machinery
and put it back together to learn how it runs. So it's oftentimes a
persuasive communication technique in meetings to use images. Here's
where I think. Graphs is a good example. Here's our past performance
over the last three years, and here's where I think it's going and here's
what I think it will do.
Make it personal. Say that here's something that I've learned in the past.
Here's a situation that I've been in. Here's situations where you've been
in. And let's take that information, that knowledge, and see if we can't
make it work to reach a solution.
And don't be afraid to use emotion that as you're trying to make s
persuasive argument that the solution here affected these many people
negatively and I think this is why we should take this direction, and I think
it will get us past those emotional problems.
Show them a picture of a sick puppy if you have to, if that's what it takes.
But use persuasive communication techniques.
Page 4
There are ways to overcome barriers to communication where there's
some of the barriers that we have that -- presentation of random
information. Somebody will go into a meeting and somebody will be
taking about one thing, somebody else will be talking about something
else, somebody else will be talking about a third thing. One way to get
around that is to organize the information, set a time schedule for when it
will be discussed, and organize it and present an agenda, and make that
the bible that you work by. Here's what we're going to be discussing at
that time, and let's keep on track.
Interruptions from outside the team. I don't know how many meetings I've
been into that somebody will get a phone call for something that's
completely irrelevant. Let them know that this meeting will be an hour and
any interruptions from outside will not be -- hold all calls and you'll get
back in touch with them when the meeting is over.
Another thing you want to look at is interruption from inside the team.
There are several times where I've been in meetings where people have
gone and held discussions, sideline discussions that had no bearing on
what was being discussed at all. So you want to make sure that there's a
specific way to handle those interruptions as well.
No side bars. Let's keep it all on -- let's keep the discussion all on the
team and everybody participate. Times you'll have a barrier where
information is revealed prematurely or arrives too late. This is also a
problem to communication where you want to have an agreement where
Page 5
anything that's discussed in the meeting is confidential until we can agree
on when it should be released to the general public, or also arrives too late
where we need the information for this meeting and it's not available
because somebody hadn't done the research or whatever reason. They at
least need to know that somebody comes to a meeting and expecting to
discuss something, that that information is available or they give them a
heads up ahead of time.
Irrelevant material dominates a discussion. It's often times very hard as a
team leader to keep the discussion on track. And you want that to be a
very specific and firm ground rule that -- and the way to govern that, once
again, is by the use of an agenda, that we're off track and I want to bring
attention, and let's stay on the discussion, and bring everybody back to the
table that this is what we're talking about. We can talk about this later or
we can talk about this at our next meeting. Let's stay on task.
Another problem is team members think alike and want to agree but are
not considering other choices or being creative. Once again, this is group
think where people are most comfortable when they agree. But the
problem with that is, that it doesn't allow them to explore other
opportunities that may be better. So you have -- it maybe a non-workable
item. May need to assign somebody the task of taking the role of the --
that's the role of the devil's advocate that, okay, I'm going to take an
unpopular position and argue its benefits, and see what we come up with.
Page 6
So you want to identify all opportunities, and you want the pros and cons
to be equally discussed.
Also you want to take a look at what ifs. Well, okay, I know that that may
sound like the best solution, but what if we did it this way? And let's
explore all the paths that that might take. What if we did it this way?
We've always done it like this before, but what if we did something
completely wild? And that's the way that creativity is used in some of the
biggest discoveries or inventions have come to fruition that way. So take
a look at the what ifs as well.
{End of recording.}
Page 1
BUILDING TEAMWORK MODULE THREE – TEAM SYNERGY Male: Let's take a look now at Module Three, Team Synergy. What is synergy?
What's the definition of Synergy? Synergy is defined as two or more
things coming together to produce a result not independently obtainable.
That usually tells us that two heads are better than one, that a cohesive
group is more than the sum of its parts. That's what we're looking for in a
successful team as well, using all that information, that skill, to come up
with something that is maybe not obtainable by just one person.
And it occurs when you have a productive team that is enabled, committed
and productive, that they will take the ball with a problem and know how to
interact with each other, and go about discussing the problem, and
arriving at a solution. Moves easily outside its comfort zone.
Really, discussion or action on a problem is really useless unless you
push the envelope, or another way of saying it is thinking outside the box.
We've talked about the what ifs before that is comfortable thinking outside
of the box, and choosing norms that create a positive culture that
everybody realizes the value of each member of the team and what they
bring to the table, and how they interact, and they're valued by other
members of the team.
Self reliant and interdependent does not -- takes their own action, is
empowered, do not wait on somebody to tell them what to do, that this is
the road they're going down, and this is what they're investigating, and
here's why.
Page 2
So we have a diagram here that says synergy occurs when you have a
productive team that -- and there's four separate aspects that you look for
in a synergistic team. They feel that they belong, they feel that they have
power, they feel that they have freedom. And it's fun. Fun is oftentimes
the most important part of a meeting. Nobody wants to continue to work
on a task they don't eventually have some fun at. And that doesn't mean
going to the circus every day or anything, but small group activities where
the focus is more on group interaction than doing the grinding work, and
they're able to interact with each other in a social setting maybe.
As far as belonging, it's important that a team member feels acceptance
on the team, and it's a joint effort, the benefits, and the feelings, and the
feedback they have for them for working on a project with other members.
Power, they want to feel like they have control over maybe their career or
their work and what's going on with their work. And they can pass on
information that they receive this, so the organization can grow. And as
far as the freedom, they want to be able to take responsibility, that they
can trust other people that they work with and take responsibility for some
of the things that are going on and some of the knowledge that they bring
to the table. So that's all aspects of -- oftentimes what team members are
looking for in -- as far as working on a team. So that's important to keep in
mind when you're trying to build teamwork.
Looking for synergy is often another word for cohesion. And we want to
take a look at that. We want to understand that. As group cohesion
Page 3
increases, the communication increases. It's easier for the team members
to talk to each other and to communicate. They have the common goals,
interests, and oftentimes it's easier to reach cohesion with a small team
rather than a larger team. So sometimes a group of four or five members
often works well together rather than a group of a hundred. It's -- and of
course that just is common sense, that they're easier to work together with
the smaller the group is.
And they provide each other with support against outside threats, that if
somebody threatens the team that -- we see this even through nature, that
if somebody threatens the team that they're all able to react and provide
protection. We see that's how bees work. So it's something to think about
as far as building a team. But it also provides risk as far as decision
making.
There's two particular risks that you want to be aware of as far as
cohesion is concern, and one is group polarization. Now, research has
shown that a team that oftentimes will take a position, a more risky
position, if they have more people to share with. So say, for instance,
somebody comes up with a suggestion that they do something that's risky
or perceived as risky, a lot of times the rest of the group will take that
same position even though it's riskier than what their initial position was,
because they have other people to share it with. So that's one risk to be
aware of as far as cohesion.
Page 4
Also, we've talked about -- and we want to talk about again, group think.
That it's comfortable for a group of people discussing a problem to arrive
at a solution without much discussion or without discussing maybe the
more creative or more volatile ways to solve the problem. People are
more comfortable when they're in a group with agreement that they all
agree with. So that's one thing you want to be aware of, that you're not
going down a road to group think and all arriving at the same solution
without really thinking through all the solutions.
{End of recording.}
Page 1
BUILDING TEAMWORK MODULE FOUR – FEEDBACK Male: Module Four. Feedback. A lot of us look on feedback as negative,
somebody telling us what we did wrong. There are two different types of
feedback, positive and negative feedback. And all feedback is, is
information on past performance. And it's information on past
performance that can be used to determine future performance. Here's
what I maybe did wrong or could do better. Here's somebody telling me,
and I can take that information and use it in my future performance.
One look at feedback, if you are giving feedback, that it is factual, that
says something here -- once again, we're dealing with data that's facts.
Here for instance, you talk to somebody and say I observed you in the
meeting and you didn't contribute. That's a fact. It's not an opinion or
something vague. I just don't like the way you look; you don't want to
make it like that. But I observed you not contributing in a meeting. And it
has to be observable, like I saw that I thought you were thinking, no. It
has to be action that's observable. And there's an acronym to use for this,
it's FORMS, F-O-R-M-S. First one's factual, observable, or responsive.
Not that you did make a response or you didn't make a response, but
that's the form you want them -- the feedback to take to remain as positive
feedback.
Measureable. You interrupted three times. You interrupted four times.
Want it to be measureable. And what I'm trying to get at is you want it to
be particularly concrete, tangible, not intangible. And you want it to be
Page 2
specific, be as specific as you can pointing out that here's what you
observed, here's the feedback that you observed.
It's descriptive. It's specific. It's behavior oriented. Here's what you did.
Here's what I observed you doing. It's realistic. It's not something that's
out of the world. And it's focused on the situation. You were at the
meeting and I observed you not participating several times.
What it is not -- what feedback is not -- and let's be real clear about that --
is judgmental. You're just trying to give them information that they can use
to refine their future performance. Where we said it is specific, it is not
general. Give them specific instances as to how they perform, what you
observe them doing.
It is not character oriented. You want it to be, like we said earlier,
behavior oriented. Here's the behavior that I observed. Not that I think
you're nuts or something of that nature. You don't want it to be like that.
That's negative. And it does nobody any good.
Feedback, it's gold, if you can take that and use it to modify your future
performance. But if it's negative feedback, it's not worth anything, and
you're wasting your time.
Unrealistic -- just as we said earlier, we want it to be realistic. That it's
something that somebody can do something with and take that and use it.
And it's not focused on the person. This is focused on the situation. In
this situation you did this. Now, feedback -- well, you always do this and I
don't like it; is negative feedback, and it's no good, it's worthless. It has no
Page 3
use as far as teamwork. And this is something that this person can use.
They may not even be aware that they're behaving this way. But with this
feedback, it's something that they can take and use and modify their future
behavior. So have that in mind when you're giving feedback.
Now, as far as receiving feedback, there are several steps that you want
to take as well. Listen to what a person is telling you. Look them in the
eyes and don't automatically react negatively or try to defend yourself as
far as receiving the feedback. There are some people that can take
feedback and some people that can't. And you want to be aware of your
situation.
Listen to what they're saying. Breathe evenly. Try not to lose your
temper. Look them directly in the eye and acknowledge that they're giving
you the feedback and what they're saying you feel is valuable. And then
take that and use that maybe to modify your behavior.
Don't fly off the handle or, like I say, get mad. Stop and -- if you don't
understand, question. And try to understand what they are trying to say, if
you really don't understand it. And then maybe take some time to reflect
upon it, and how you can use it to your benefit in, perhaps the next
meeting.
So feedback is a very valuable part of team building and becoming close
to the people that you will be working with on this team. And it's a good
way to facilitate communication between team members. So take this to
heart as far as the way you give feedback and you receive feedback.
Page 1
BUILDING TEAMWORK MODULE FIVE – OVERCOMING CONFLICT Male: Module Five. Overcoming Conflict. Many of us, when we think about
conflict, we think of it in a negative manner, that no good comes of conflict,
and we want everything to be unicorns and balloons. And it's not. Many
times it's not, and especially working in teams. But conflict can have
positive as well as negative effects. Let's look at some of the positive
effects that conflict might have as some disagreements or differences rise
to the top between team members.
One of the positive effects that conflict might have is it indicates a problem
exist, that there may be a situation where other team members are not
even aware that there is a conflict, and once it is put on the table that it
gives an indication that there is a problem that needs to be addressed.
Another positive effect, it offers challenges for new solutions. Here we
have a conflict, and the way we are doing things results in this conflict.
Let's examine new ways of doing things, and it might give us a new idea.
It causes win-win opportunities, that here is an opportunity for us to say
this is what this person is looking for, this is what this person is looking for,
let's examine ways and paths to go down to find a win-win opportunity
where both sides benefit.
Now, of course there are some negative effects as well that conflict in all
situations causes stress, and that with all the due effects of that, it's bad.
It creates confusion, ambiguity and unproductive work climate.
Page 2
If the problems aren't addressed and addressed in a positive manner,
ultimately the team will fall apart because of the confusion, ambiguity and
unproductive work climate, that the team won't be able to work together,
and causes win-lose situation, a zero sum game. It often forces team
members to take sides in the argument or the conflict to either I win, if I
win, you lose, if you win, I lose. So it needs to be addressed and
opportunities need to be examined that will present a win-win opportunity.
There's a couple of steps to take to resolve conflict. Hopefully, you can
take these, maybe examine the conflict, and easily glide through it. One is
to ask team members to examine the source of the conflict. Why are we
arguing? What started this? Is it something that I said, or position that I
took, or is my decision going to affect some of your friends, or just exactly
what is the source of the conflict?
Determine the positive and negative effects. If we do this, what's going to
happen? If we do this, what's going to happen? What positive going to
come out, what negatives going to come out of it?
Identify and ask the team for their input as well as far as identify possible
solutions. How can we get this resolved? What solutions or what road do
we need to go down to resolve this conflict?
Just like we did with -- in the beginning, set ground rules, boundaries, and
ground rules. We will discuss this problem. Here's how we will discuss it
and what needs to come out of it.
Page 3
Or maybe number five, agree to reach consensus or agree to disagree.
We've heard this several times, that it is pointless maybe for us to
continue along this line, see no solution in sight, let's just agree to
disagree.
One thing I want to talk about consensus while we're on it, is a lot of
people have misconception about just exactly what is consensus. And
they think it means that unamity, everybody on the team reaching the
same solution, that everybody agrees on everything, and at the end they
all hug, and everybody has the same agreement. And that is far from the
case, that consensus does not mean unanimity.
Oftentimes unanimity is often a sign of weakness in the decision making of
the group. In ancient times a verdict on a criminal in a criminal trial, if they
all agreed, the people rendering the system, it often meant that a proper
defense wasn't prepared for the person on trial, and that person was let go
because of an improper defense.
So unanimity is often looked at as a sign of weakness in the decision
making. It meant that maybe the -- it's an indicator for a group think, here
we go again with group think, that they're not willing to discuss creative
ways to solve the problem, but we're instead more focused on reaching a
unanimous agreement. So be aware of this when you're trying to reach
consensus. It can also indicate a rigged process to where that maybe the
decision making was driven by someone with more power in the group
and drove it all to their particular position, their favorite position. So it's an
Page 4
indication of that as well. Indicates lack of creativity. They didn't examine
all the creative outlets. Or it often indicates a lack of courage to explore
further.
So a dissenting vote, as far as a solution is concerned, is not a bad thing.
Matter a fact, it's often a better thing than having a unanimous vote. One
thing that consensus aims to be, it aims to be agreement seeking. It
attempts to help everyone get what they need. It needs to be
collaborative, a shared proposal shaped into a decision that meets the
concerns of all group members.
You want to make sure that all the factions are heard from, that they were
able to get their needs addressed. The weakest group was able to get
their needs addressed as well as the strongest group. So it needs to be
collaborative, cooperative.
The ultimate goal of the team is to reach the best position, the best
solution, rather than compete for somebody's favorite, where the strongest
will overpower the weakest.
It needs to be a egalitarian, where all members should have an equal
opportunity for input. Everybody needs to be heard, and their opinion
needs to be heard. You want to create an environment where even the
smallest person gets input that is equal to the strongest person, inclusive.
As many stakeholders as possible should be involved. This decision is
going to affect who? And what have we heard from them or their
Page 5
representatives? They need to have an opportunity to be heard from as
well, the people that this decision is going to effect.
And it should be participatory, which means that members of the team
should solicit input from everybody, as much input as they can possibly
muster or bring to the table, they should go out and actively seek input.
{End of recording.}