buildings at risk in leeds bar strategy_16.pdf · buildings at risk in leeds strategy &...
TRANSCRIPT
Buildings At Risk in Leeds
Strategy and Register
2009
Build
ings
at
Risk
in L
eeds
Str
ateg
y &
Reg
iste
r 20
09
2
Some Grade I and II*
Buildings at Risk
Temple Mill, Holbeck
Mount St. Mary’s Church
First White Cloth Hall, Kirkgate
Thorpe Hall
PART 1 – LEEDS REVIEW 2007-09 SUMMARY Leeds District now has 2,337 listed building ‘entries’ – representing more than 3,000 individual listed buildings. Although most of these are in use and kept in good repair, some are not. These ‘listed buildings at risk’ (BARs) are threatened by neglect and decay: their future is in doubt. There are currently 96 buildings or structures on the Leeds Buildings at Risk Register, that is, 4% (compared to 3.3% in 2007) of the total stock of listed buildings in the Leeds district. Of these, six are ‘vulnerable’ and 90 are ‘at risk’. 1 The Council’s target has been to ‘resolve’ at least ten BARs per year. But the rate of resolution since 2004 has been closer to four or five items per year. The revised target for 2010 is to remove at least six from the list. HIGH-GRADE BUILDINGS at RISK The higher-grade Buildings at Risk are also catalogued in the Heritage at Risk Register for Yorkshire and the Humber Region, which has been assembled by English Heritage. Leeds has twelve higher-grade buildings or structures at risk: – Structural Monument: • Rothwell Castle (chapel ruin), Church Street, Rothwell. Grade I: • Temple Mill, Marshall St., Holbeck (new entry 2009) • Ledston Hall, Hall Lane, Ledston. Grade II*: • Church of St Margaret, Cardigan Road, Burley • Mount St Mary’s Church, Church Road, Richmond Hill • Stank Hall Barn, Dewsbury Road, Beeston • Hunslet Mill, Goodman Street, Hunslet • First White Cloth Hall, 98-100 Kirkgate, City Centre • Temple Mill Gate Lodge, Marshall Street, Holbeck • Clumpcliffe Gazebo, Methley Lane, Methley • Thorpe Hall, Middleton Lane, Thorpe-on-the-Hill • Memorial to Queen Victoria, Woodhouse Moor. These twelve comprise 8.3% of Leeds’ 145 outstanding listed buildings or structures, and this compares disappointingly with the regional average in 2009 of 4.6% and with the national average of 3.1%. So there is much work to be done locally.
1 These terms are explained in the Leeds Register (below) and on the English Heritage website www.english-heritage.org.uk
< Front cover: Hunslet Mill
Stank Hall Barn, Beeston
Memorial to Queen Victoria
Build
ings
at
Risk
in L
eeds
Str
ateg
y &
Reg
iste
r 20
09
3
Some Grade II Buildings at Risk
PROGRESS REPORT The Leeds Buildings at Risk Register lists all 96 BARs. Analysis of the register reveals the following headline facts: – • The major new entry this year has been Temple Mill in
Holbeck. Promisingly however, the roof collapse at Temple Mill (in December 2008) has now been fully scaffolded.
• The Leeds Register has grown – largely as our knowledge
increases of the condition of the listed building stock. But 28 BARs have nonetheless been dealt with and come off the register since 2004 (when there were 91) – notably Kirkstall Abbey and Harewood Castle.
• The service plan target has been to remove at least ten items
per year from bands A–F. But the rate of ‘resolution’ since 2004 has only been four or five BARs per year.
• Leeds City Council owns 22 BARs, nearly a quarter of
buildings on the Register, but has successfully dealt with eight cases since 2004.
• Most BARs are located outside the city centre where
regeneration has been strongest. There is a wide distribution in the inner suburbs, the townships, and in the country estates.
• Resolution appears to be in prospect for 23% of Leeds’
buildings at risk. • The main challenge is from the 6 No. Priority A cases and
63 No. Priority C cases, where no solution has yet been identified. Half (35) are simply structures that need maintenance and long-term stewardship, but half (34) are buildings capable of, and in need of, beneficial use.
Former York Road Library
62 High Street, Clifford
Chapel Allerton Mansion
Scatcherd Mausoleum, Morley
Horsforth Corn Mill
Fearnville, Hollin Park
Build
ings
at
Risk
in L
eeds
Str
ateg
y &
Reg
iste
r 20
09
4
PART 2 – LEEDS BUILDINGS AT RISK STRATEGY INTRODUCTION ‘Looking after Leeds’ is a cornerstone ‘council value’. The following strategy for Listed Buildings at Risk in Leeds responds to this. It focuses on Listed Buildings at Risk in Leeds – albeit just one element of our ‘Heritage at Risk’ mentioned above. As Leeds’ economy changes, so must its buildings and their functions: some will fall into disuse or disrepair. And yet, these buildings are of considerable cultural or historic importance to the Leeds community. So they need a new future. Normally, the best use for a listed building such as a barn or a large house is that for which it was designed. But where the original use is no longer viable or appropriate, a change of use has to be seen positively, whilst maximising retention of original fabric, principal rooms, plan-form and spatial quality. A change of owner can be crucial – the new owner bringing fresh resources. The Register lists the names of the buildings, and is publicly accessible. In a sense, it ‘names and shames’ problem buildings. The Council’s Conservation Team endeavours to resolve the future of all BARs, whether Council-owned or privately-owned. The buildings in Bands A and C need planned solutions; so the greatest effort will be made towards these. Prospective developers, entrepreneurs, architects – and indeed house-hunters – can peruse the Leeds BAR Register, looking for exciting new projects. The Conservation Team normally holds contact details. TARGETS for 2010-11 In the period to the end of March 2011, the City Council aims to stop the further deterioration of the following BARs through negotiation or direct action. The City Council’s top-six priority cases currently are:-– 1. First White Cloth Hall, 98 & 100 Kirkgate, City Centre, LS2:
This Grade II* listed building dated 1711 is in a critical condition despite being supported by scaffold. Leeds Civic Trust report that window lintels have failed. The Council has made a bid to the Heritage Lottery Fund for assistance with a regeneration scheme for the lower Kirkgate area that aims to help rescue this building.
2. Stank Hall complex, Dewsbury Road, Beeston, LS11: A joint-initiative between LCC and EH for the repair of the scheduled barn is being implemented, but development proposals for the overall site, including the two Grade II listed halls and possible newbuild, need to be progressed by LCC.
3. Mount St Mary’s, Church Road, Richmond Hill, LS9: A review is necessary of the future of this prominent Grade II* Listed Building as part of a wider development scheme, which has so far failed to secure Government grant.
More Grade II Buildings at Risk
St Mark’s Church, Woodhouse
Abbey Mills, Kirkstall
Victoria Arch, Beckett Park
Lambert’s Arcade, Briggate
High Royds, Menston
Wharfedale Hospital, Otley
Build
ings
at
Risk
in L
eeds
Str
ateg
y &
Reg
iste
r 20
09
5
4. Fearnville, Dib Lane, Hollin Park, LS8: Leeds Civic Trust report in a building study that this Grade II listed villa has been deteriorating rapidly. Urgent negotiations need to take place with the new owner.
5. York Road Library, Richmond Hill, LS9: This prominent Grade II Listed Building has recently been stripped of all its roofing slates. It needs to be safeguarded in the short term and perhaps to be a part of a larger development scheme currently being planned for the area.
6. Temple Mill complex, Marshall Street, Holbeck, LS11: Temporary repairs and usage have been secured for the Grade I listed mill, but a long-term development and repair strategy is needed for the overall site including the Grade II* listed gate-lodge.
The Conservation Team will also actively pursue the following cases:– Templar House, Lady Lane, City Centre, LS2 – there is an urgent gutters problem. Hunslet & Victoria Mills complex, Goodman Street, Hunslet, LS10
– the owners will be encouraged to review their approved scheme in the light of the Lower Aire Valley proposed eco-settlement.
Tower Works, 6 & 8 Globe Road, Holbeck, LS11 – repairs will need to be of a high quality. Arncliffe complex, 22 Shire Oak Road, Headingley, LS6 – works of repair and reinstatement will be negotiated. Horsforth Corn Mill, Corn Mill Fold, Low Lane, Horsforth, LS18 – a change of ownership appears to be necessary. Thorpe Hall, Middleton Lane, Lofthouse, WF3 – a change of ownership appears to be necessary. COUNCIL-OWNED BARs A five-point plan adopted by the Asset Management Group in 2004 to address BARs in City Council ownership remains a commitment: Building surveys and urgent works The surveying of BARs is dealt with through our on-going
condition survey programme. Action plans The preparation of an action plan for each BAR needs to be
agreed between Corporate Property Management and the Service which is operationally responsible.
Planned maintenance This needs to be agreed by Corporate Property Management. Capital receipts disposal The disposal of surplus BARs as quickly as possible is already
an existing objective, but is subject to market demand. The aim is to keep such buildings wind and watertight in the meantime where practically possible until disposal can take place.
Asset Management plan policies The Council’s commitment to this area of work is likely to be
reiterated in the Council’s Asset Management Plan for 2010/11. PRIVATELY-OWNED BARs Owners Responsibilities The Leeds BAR Strategy and Register provides the policy context for Council intervention over individual cases – involving the serving of (or threat of) Urgent Works Notices or other types of Notice. The owner of a Listed Building is under no legal obligation to
Major Buildings ‘SAVED’
Kirkstall Abbey
Harewood Castle
Harewood Castle
Kirkstall Abbey
Build
ings
at
Risk
in L
eeds
Str
ateg
y &
Reg
iste
r 20
09
6
maintain a building in good repair, but a local authority does have powers to act early in order to arrest deterioration and secure repair. Private owners of historic buildings receive very little grant assistance, local or national. In fact only ten buildings in the region benefited last year from direct public grant from English Heritage or the Heritage Lottery Fund. That funding totalled about £600,000, and the beneficiaries were either (a) historic places of worship or (b) higher-grade listed buildings. English Heritage have published guidance on “Stopping the Rot”. This explains the powers available to local authorities to give protec-tion to heritage assets in their area. One power is the Section 54 Urgent Works Notice. Urgent Works: • An Urgent Works Notice is made under Section 54 of the
1990 Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act . • A Section 54 UWN comprises a ‘statement of intent’ that the
Council intends to itself carry out Urgent Works and then re-claim the costs from the owner.
• Buildings in ecclesiastical use, crown land and scheduled ancient monuments are exempt.
• The object is to secure emergency repairs to unoccupied parts of a BAR – to prevent deterioration and damage due to wind and weather, collapse, rot, vandalism or theft. Permanent repairs are possible.
• The works should be the minimum necessary and should not involve the owner in great expense.
In pursuing privately-owned BARs, the City Council will follow English Heritage recommended ‘stages of action’. These stages or ‘steps’ are elaborated into Leeds’ own strategy as follows. Stages of Action: 1. Written warnings expressing the Council’s concerns, the need
for protection and the Council’s intent. 2. Request a site meeting, to discuss the circumstances of the
case and Health & Safety issues. 3. Request access to the site and building, for the purpose of
survey and making a dated photographic record, if necessary using Section 88 power of entry.
4. Prepare a draft Schedule of Repairs. The form of the Schedule will be concisely written and in plain English; will state why works are necessary, in terms of performance; will list specific works capable of being implemented by an owner who decides to act of his own volition; will set out alternative works, if any; and will state standards of work to be achieved.
5. Meet the owner or agent again, so that they are aware of the process. This may be sufficient to make the owner provide written confirmation of their intention to carry out the works on the draft schedule, with a start date.
6. Request English Heritage for grant support. English Heritage may possibly ‘underwrite’ a Council’s costs with an 80% grant in pursuing the service of a statutory notice. This is provided that the Council intends to recover the costs from the owner – if necessary using a Section 55 Notice – as the grant is repayable to English Heritage. To qualify, the building would have to be on the Council’s BAR Register, and, in the case of a Section 54 UWN, vacant / unoccupied, and the grade of the
Buildings at Risk ‘SAVED’
Carr Mills, Meanwood
Clumpcliffe Barn, Methley
Elmet Hall, Roundhay
Arncliffe, Headingley
Neptune Street, Riverside
Build
ings
at
Risk
in L
eeds
Str
ateg
y &
Reg
iste
r 20
09
7
building would have to be Grade I or Grade II* (but not a Scheduled Ancient Monument), or Grade II within a CA.
7. Appoint a project manager for the Section 54 UWN – normally the Council’s Conservation Officer.
8. Seek the support of senior management and Members. 9. Prepare a costed Schedule of Repairs.
The max administrative cost or preparing a schedule should typically be £1,000. The max cost of the Urgent Works should typically be £25,000, including the costs of renting equipment. Items in a typical schedule should include: site barriers, propping, making services safe, removing rubbish & asbestos & vegetation, repairs to roofs and rainwater goods, provision of ventilation.
10. Meet the owner or agent again, so that they are aware of the process and are not tempted to deliberately torch the building out of desperation.
11. Consider whether other Notices might be more appropriate: such as:
Section 9 of the Planning (LB & CA) Act 1990 – criminal offence Section 38 of ditto – listed building enforcement notice Section 77 of the Buildings Act 1984 – dangerous structure Section 78 of the Buildings Act 1984 – immediate danger Section 79 of the Buildings Act 1984 – dilapidation Section 215 of the T&CP Act 1990 – amenity Section 29 of the Loc. Govt. Act 1982 – public health.
12. Consider whether the building is so neglected that the need for permanent repair accumulates to ‘risk of serious harm’ – regardless of whether the building is occupied or not, and of the owner’s means. If so, and if the Council has a partner such as a Building Preservation Trust lined up and committed to take over ownership of such a difficult BAR, then the Council will consider pursuing not only a Section 54 UWN but also, with confirmation of the Secretary of State, a Section 48 full Repairs Notice involving Compulsory Purchase for ‘the proper, long-term preservation of the building’. Only the owner can carry out repairs specified in a Section 48 full Repairs Notice.
Such cases are complex, so the Council would need to appoint a Project Manager, ideally a conservation-accredited Registered Architect or Chartered Surveyor, whilst also pursuing Urgent Works in the short term.
13. Prepare a project plan with target dates, and a strategy for the long-term future of the building, and seek Member support. The Council will be ‘resolved but fair’ in its actions.
14. Request tenderers for the contract to submit a lump fee for the works, accompanied by a methodology, and agree a time-charge for any additional work.
15. The chosen tender will not necessarily be the lowest: it will instead have the best methodology.
16. Arrange access to the site and building for the contractor, who will keep their own dated photographic record.
17. Have the contractor lined-up and committed to start work at the end of a 7-day period, being the normal period of an UWN.
18. The correctly-delegated officer of the Council will authorise the UWN, and it will be served legally on all relevant parties.
19. The form of the notice will contain: – • A summary of Section 54 • Reference to cost recovery under Section 55 • A separate Schedule of Works • Plans and location map • Council contact details.
83A Otley Road, Headingley
North Hill House, Headingley
Buildings at Risk ‘SAVED’
Build
ings
at
Risk
in L
eeds
Str
ateg
y &
Reg
iste
r 20
09
8
PART 3 – LEEDS BUILDINGS AT RISK REGISTER INTRODUCTION The Leeds Register follows overleaf in spread-sheet form >>>> DEFINITIONS What is a Listed Building? A listed building is a building or structure that has been identified by English Heritage on behalf of Government as being of ‘special architectural or historic interest’ – nationally. Most are listed Grade II, but about 8% are ‘outstanding’ and these are listed Grade I or Grade II*. All listed buildings are statutorily protected and Listed Building Consent is required from the planning authority for any works that would affect the building's character - whether internal, external or works to curtilage structures. The impact of new-build on the setting of a listed building is a ‘planning consideration’. What is a Building At Risk? A BAR is a listed building or structure in danger of losing its significance whether it be through decay or damage. Causes can include: functional redundancy, poor location, high cost of repair, or refusal of the owner to meet their general duty of care. For buildings that can be occupied or have a use, the main vulnerability is vacancy, or under-use. Actually, about half of BARs are structures incapable of occupation, and are therefore incapable of beneficial use: they need maintenance and a repair budget for good stewardship. So the condition and occupancy of listed buildings need to be monitored by the Local Authority, resources allocated, and action taken to stop the rot. Priority for Action The ‘strategic’ Priority for Action A to F is noted in the last column :– Priorities A & C require solutions to be agreed – so entries are in red. Priorities B & D have agreed solutions, but not yet implemented. Priority E means under repair but no user identified, or under threat of redundancy. Priority F cases have a repair scheme in progress and user identified, or they are functionally
redundant with new use agreed but not yet implemented. An entry marked C(C) means ‘no change since last review’: i.e. the building remains Priority C now, and was Priority (C) in the previous register. The above detailed definitions are set out on page 25 of the EH publication Heritage at Risk 2009: www.english-heritage.org.uk/upload/pdf/190609yorkshire_2009_har_register.pdf Targets Under the column-heading TARGET, approximately a dozen BARs or ‘complexes’ are identified that the Conservation Team aims – through negotiation or direct action before 31.3.2011– to secure from further deterioration.
Bui
ldin
gs a
t Ris
k in
Lee
ds –
as
at 3
1 D
ecem
ber 2
009
Stre
et
Stre
et N
ame
Bui
ldin
g N
ame
Loca
lity
LCC
G
rade
C
ondi
tion
Occ
upan
cy
PRIO
RIT
Y TA
RG
ET
No.
owne
d
for a
ctio
n
Ab
bey
Rd
Abbe
y M
ills
Kirk
stal
l █
II
poor
va
cant
C
(C)
Atk
inso
n S
t D
ryin
g H
ouse
to V
icto
ria M
ill
Hun
slet
II po
or
vaca
nt
B (B
)
A
tkin
son
St
Vic
toria
Mill
H
unsl
et
II
poor
va
cant
B
(B)
Bec
kett
Par
k V
icto
ria A
rch
Bec
kett
Par
k
II po
or
n/a
C (B
)
B
ecke
tt S
treet
C
emet
ery
Mon
umen
t to
Sar
ah K
idne
y
Bur
man
tofts
█
II
poor
n/
a C
(C)
Bra
dfor
d R
oad
Mai
n B
uild
ing
at H
igh
Roy
ds &
P&
Gar
den
Men
ston
II po
or
vaca
nt
C
2
Bra
nch
Roa
d M
ike'
s C
arpe
ts
Arm
ley
II
poor
p/
t vac
ant
C
6
& 8
C
anal
Rd
Cot
tage
s at
Arm
ley
Mills
A
rmle
y
II po
or
vaca
nt
C (C
)
C
ardi
gan
Rd
Chu
rch
of S
t Mar
gare
t B
urle
y
II*
fair
vaca
nt
E (D
)
C
hurc
h R
d M
ount
St M
ary’
s C
hurc
h R
ichm
ond
Hill
II*
po
or
vaca
nt
D (A
) 1
C
hurc
h S
treet
R
othw
ell C
astle
(cha
pel r
uin)
R
othw
ell
S
AM
po
or
n/a
C
Com
mer
cial
Rd
Ford
and
wei
r on
Riv
er A
ire
Kirk
stal
l
II po
or
n/a
C (C
)
19
Cro
w L
n Fo
rmer
wor
ksho
p O
tley
II
poor
va
cant
C
(C)
Dew
sbur
y R
d S
tank
Hal
l Bar
n B
eest
on
█
SA
M /
II*
very
bad
va
cant
A
1
D
ewsb
ury
Rd
Sta
nk H
all
Bee
ston
█
II
very
bad
va
cant
A
(C)
1
Dew
sbur
y R
d N
ew H
all
Bees
ton
█
II
very
bad
va
cant
A
(C)
1
Dib
Lan
e Fe
arnv
ille
H
ollin
Par
k
II
poor
va
cant
C
(C)
1
Farn
ley
Lane
Lo
dge
and
gate
s O
tley
█
II po
or
vaca
nt
C
Elle
rby
Rd
Boun
dary
wal
l to
Chu
rch
of S
t Sav
iour
R
ichm
ond
Hill
II
poor
n/
a C
(C)
Fairf
ax R
oad
Hol
beck
Cem
eter
y: m
emor
ial t
o H
enry
Mar
sden
Be
esto
n
█
II po
or
n/a
C (C
)
6 &
8
Glo
be R
oad
Tow
er W
orks
ent
ranc
e ra
nge
Hol
beck
II ve
ry b
ad
vaca
nt
B
1 23
& 2
5 G
oodm
an S
t H
unsl
et M
ill H
unsl
et
II*
po
or
vaca
nt
D (B
) 1
21A
G
oodm
an S
t V
icto
ria W
orks
H
unsl
et
II
poor
va
cant
B
(B)
1 1-
5 G
rosv
enor
Mou
nt
Bou
ndar
y w
alls
H
eadi
ngle
y
II
poor
n/
a C
(C)
Gro
sven
or R
d B
ound
ary
wal
l E o
f 1 G
rosv
enor
Ter
r H
eadi
ngle
y
II po
or
n/a
C (C
)
G
rosv
enor
Rd
Bou
ndar
y w
all t
o G
rosv
enor
Hou
se
Hea
ding
ley
II
poor
n/
a C
(C)
Gro
sven
or R
d Bo
unda
ry w
all t
o R
idge
way
Hou
se
Hea
ding
ley
II po
or
n/a
C (C
)
H
aigh
Moo
r Rd
Bar
n E
of N
o. 1
83
Wes
t Ard
sley
II po
or
vaca
nt
D (C
)
H
all L
n Ba
rn W
of F
arnl
ey H
all
Farn
ley
█
II
poor
n/
a C
(C)
Hal
l Ln
Gaz
ebo
& ca
rt-sh
ed to
Far
nley
Hal
l Fa
rnle
y
█
II po
or
n/a
C (C
)
H
all L
n St
able
s W
of g
azeb
o at
Far
nley
Hal
l Fa
rnle
y
█
II po
or
n/a
C (C
)
H
all L
ane
Leds
ton
Hal
l Le
dsto
n
I fa
ir pt
vac
ant
E
H
areh
ills
Ave
nue
9 N
ewto
n G
rove
P
otte
rnew
ton
II fa
ir va
cant
F
(C)
Har
ehill
s La
ne
Man
sion
at f
orm
er C
hape
l Alle
rton
Hos
pita
l C
hape
l Alle
rton
II
poor
va
cant
C
(C)
Har
roga
te R
d C
otta
ge o
ppos
ite G
atew
ays
Sch
ool
Har
ewoo
d
II po
or
vaca
nt
C (C
)
H
arro
gate
Rd
The
Old
Cor
n M
ill H
arew
ood
II po
or
vaca
nt
C (C
)
H
arro
gate
Rd
Forg
e H
ouse
, Hom
e Fa
rm, S
tank
H
arew
ood
II po
or
vaca
nt
C (B
)
H
enco
nner
Lan
e Bo
unda
ry w
all t
o N
ewto
n Vi
llas
Nos
. 66
- 70
Cha
pel A
llerto
n
II po
or
n/a
C (C
)
Bui
ldin
gs a
t Ris
k in
Lee
ds –
as
at 3
1 D
ecem
ber 2
009
(con
tinue
d)
St
reet
St
reet
Nam
e B
uild
ing
Nam
e Lo
calit
y LC
C
Gra
de
Con
ditio
n O
ccup
ancy
PR
IOR
ITY
TAR
GET
N
o.
ow
ned
fo
r act
ion
62
H
igh
St
C
liffo
rd
II
poor
pt
vac
ant
C (C
)
H
ospi
tal L
ane
Old
blo
ck a
t Coo
krid
ge H
ospi
tal
Irela
nd W
ood
II
fair
vaca
nt
D
Hos
pita
l Lan
e Lo
dge
at C
ookr
idge
Hos
pita
l Ire
land
Woo
d
II fa
ir va
cant
D
H
ospi
tal L
ane
Post
box
at C
ookr
idge
Hos
pita
l Ire
land
Woo
d
II fa
ir n/
a D
H
ospi
tal L
ane
Ida
Con
vale
scen
t Hos
pita
l Ire
land
Woo
d
II fa
ir va
cant
D
35
Hun
slet
Rd
H
unsl
et
II
poor
va
cant
C
37 &
39
Hun
slet
Rd
H
unsl
et
II
poor
va
cant
C
41
Hun
slet
Rd
H
unsl
et
II
poor
va
cant
C
98-1
00
Kirk
gate
Fi
rst W
hite
Clo
th H
all
City
Cen
tre
II*
ve
ry b
ad
vaca
nt
C (A
) 1
K
irkst
all R
d W
eir o
n R
iver
Aire
K
irkst
all
II
poor
n/
a C
(C)
Kirk
stal
l Rd
Wei
r slu
ice
gate
s N
W o
f Bur
ley
Mill
s
Bur
ley
II
poor
n/
a C
(C)
29
0 K
irkst
all R
d Th
e R
isin
g S
un P
H
Bur
ley
II
fair
pt v
acan
t E
Lady
Lan
e Te
mpl
ar H
ouse
C
ity C
entre
II po
or
vaca
nt
C
1 2
Lam
bert'
s A
rcad
e (o
ff Lo
wer
Brig
gate
) C
ity C
entre
II po
or
vaca
nt
C
Low
Lan
e Fo
rmer
Cor
n M
ill, C
orn
Mill
Fol
d H
orsf
orth
II ve
ry b
ad
vaca
nt
A (B
) 1
M
ansi
on L
ane
Coa
ch H
ouse
& S
tabl
es
Rou
ndha
y █
II
poor
va
cant
C
M
anst
on L
ane
Dov
ecot
e at
tach
ed to
Man
ston
Hal
l Far
m
Aus
thor
pe
II
poor
n/
a C
(C)
Mar
shal
l Stre
et
Tem
ple
Mill
Hol
beck
I ve
ry b
ad
vaca
nt
B
1
Mar
shal
l Stre
et
Gat
e lo
dge
at T
empl
e M
ill
Hol
beck
II*
poor
n/
a C
(C)
1
Met
hley
Lan
e C
lum
pclif
fe G
azeb
o M
ethl
ey
II*
po
or
vaca
nt
B (B
)
M
ethl
ey L
ane
Ken
nels
E s
ide,
S o
f gaz
ebo
M
ethl
ey
II
poor
va
cant
B
(B)
Met
hley
Lan
e K
enne
ls W
sid
e, S
of g
azeb
o
Met
hley
II ve
ry b
ad
vaca
nt
B (B
)
M
iddl
eton
Lan
e Th
orpe
Hal
l Th
orpe
-on-
the-
Hill
II*
very
bad
va
cant
A
(C)
1
New
all C
arr R
oad
Ent
ranc
e at
Wha
rfeda
le H
ospi
tal
Otle
y
II po
or
vaca
nt
C
New
all C
arr R
oad
Infir
mar
y bl
ock
at W
harfe
dale
Hos
pita
l O
tley
II
poor
va
cant
C
N
ewal
l Car
r Roa
d M
ain
bloc
k &
anc
. bld
gs.a
t Wha
rfeda
le H
osp.
O
tley
II
poor
va
cant
C
N
orth
Hill
Roa
d W
all a
nd g
ates
to n
o 17
H
eadi
ngle
y
II po
or
n/a
C (C
)
O
tley
Rd
Col
umba
rium
at L
awns
woo
d C
emet
ery
Law
nsw
ood
█
II
poor
n/
a C
(C)
Par
k R
d B
arn
and
outb
uild
ings
at P
ark
Farm
hous
e C
olto
n
█
II po
or
n/a
C (C
)
42
Par
k S
q
City
Cen
tre
II
poor
va
cant
D
(F)
Par
ksid
e R
oad
Mea
nwoo
d H
all
Mea
nwoo
d
II fa
ir pt
vac
ant
C
Pol
lard
Lan
e W
eir a
nd re
tain
ing
wal
ls o
n R
iver
Aire
N
ewla
y
II fa
ir n/
a C
(C)
Pol
lard
Lan
e R
evet
men
t wal
l to
Whi
teco
te H
ouse
W
hite
cote
II fa
ir n/
a C
(C)
Sco
tland
Ln
Form
er fa
rmho
use
NE
of L
ing
Bob
H
orsf
orth
II ve
ry b
ad
vaca
nt
B (A
)
S
cotla
nd L
n S
tabl
es a
nd b
arn
NW
of L
ing
Bob
Far
mho
use
H
orsf
orth
II ve
ry b
ad
vaca
nt
B (A
)
S
cott
Hal
l Stre
et
Sco
tt H
all
Busl
ingt
horp
e
II fa
ir pt
vac
ant
E
22D
S
hire
Oak
Rd
C
oach
hous
e at
Arn
cliff
e H
eadi
ngle
y
II
poor
va
cant
C
1
S
hire
Oak
Rd
S
umm
erho
use
& p
ierc
ed w
all a
t Arn
cliff
e H
eadi
ngle
y
II
very
bad
n/
a A
(A)
1
Bui
ldin
gs a
t Ris
k in
Lee
ds –
as
at 3
1 D
ecem
ber 2
009
(con
tinue
d)
St
reet
St
reet
Nam
e B
uild
ing
Nam
e Lo
calit
y LC
C
Gra
de
Con
ditio
n O
ccup
ancy
PR
IOR
ITY
TAR
GET
N
o.
ow
ned
fo
r act
ion
Sm
ithy
Ln
Sta
ble
etc
E o
f Mos
eley
Far
mho
use
Coo
krid
ge
II
poor
n/
a C
(F)
St M
ark’
s R
d C
hurc
h of
St M
ark
Woo
dhou
se
II
poor
va
cant
C
(C)
St M
ark’
s R
d C
hurc
hyar
d w
all &
chu
rchy
ard,
St M
ark'
s W
oodh
ouse
█
II
poor
n/
a C
(C)
St M
icha
el’s
Rd
Bol
lard
s an
d ra
ilings
to P
aris
h H
all
Hea
ding
ley
II
poor
n/
a C
(C)
Ston
ebrid
ge L
n M
eter
Hou
se &
2 c
otta
ges
SW
of S
t'brid
ge M
ill
Farn
ley
II po
or
vaca
nt
C (C
)
Te
mpl
e N
ewsa
m P
ark
Foun
tain
Te
mpl
e N
ewsa
m
█
II po
or
n/a
C (C
)
Te
mpl
e N
ewsa
m P
ark
Littl
e Te
mpl
e Te
mpl
e N
ewsa
m
█
II po
or
n/a
C (C
)
Te
mpl
e N
ewsa
m P
ark
B
ound
ary
wal
l to
N
Tem
ple
New
sam
█
II
poor
n/
a C
(C)
Tem
ple
New
sam
Par
k
Brid
ge o
ver A
venu
e P
onds
Te
mpl
e N
ewsa
m
█
II po
or
n/a
C (C
)
Th
e G
reen
Th
e G
rang
e S
eacr
oft
█
II po
or
vaca
nt
D (D
)
Th
e G
reen
C
oach
Hou
se to
The
Gra
nge
Seac
roft
█
II
poor
va
cant
D
(C)
Thw
aite
Lan
e S
tabl
e E
of T
hwai
te M
ill
Sto
urto
n
█
II po
or
n/a
C (C
)
Tr
oy R
oad
Chu
rch
of S
t Mar
y-on
-the-
Hill
M
orle
y
II po
or
vaca
nt
C
Troy
Roa
d S
catc
herd
Mau
sole
um &
chu
rchy
ard,
St M
ary'
s M
orle
y
II po
or
n/a
C (C
)
257
Upp
er T
own
St
Lodg
e to
Man
or H
ouse
B
ram
ley
II
poor
va
cant
D
(A)
Wet
herb
y R
d B
arn
S o
f Rou
ndha
y G
rang
e
Rou
ndha
y
II
poor
va
cant
C
(C)
Whi
tfiel
d W
ay
The
Gar
den
Gat
e P
H
Hun
slet
II fa
ir pt
vac
ant
E
W
oodh
ouse
Ln
Mem
oria
l to
Que
en V
icto
ria
Woo
dhou
se M
oor
█
II*
poor
n/
a C
(C)
Woo
dhou
se L
n W
all a
nd g
ate
pier
s to
Kin
gsto
n Te
rrace
U
nive
rsity
II po
or
n/a
C (C
)
Y
ork
Rd
Form
er Y
ork
Rd
Libr
ary
Ric
hmon
d H
ill
II po
or
vaca
nt
C (B
) 1
G
rade
I / I
I* / S
M
12
=12%
Gra
de II
84=8
8%
LC
C o
wne
d 22
=23%
TO
TAL
96
C
OU
NTS
in 2
009
– by
PR
IOR
ITY
CA
TEG
OR
Y (t
he 2
007
cate
gory
is s
how
n ab
ove
in b
rack
ets)
A:
At R
isk:
im
med
iate
risk
of f
urth
er ra
pid
dete
riora
tion
or lo
ss o
f fab
ric;
no s
olut
ion
agre
ed:
A:
6
B:
At R
isk:
im
med
iate
risk
of f
urth
er ra
pid
dete
riora
tion
or lo
ss o
f fab
ric;
solu
tion
agre
ed b
ut n
ot y
et im
plem
ente
d:
B:
10
C
: A
t Ris
k:
s
tead
y de
cay;
no
solu
tion
agre
ed:
C
: 6
3
D:
At R
isk:
ste
ady
deca
y / s
tabl
e co
nditi
on;
solu
tion
agre
ed b
ut n
ot y
et im
plem
ente
d:
D
: 1
1
E:
Vuln
erab
le:
unde
r rep
air b
ut n
o us
er;
OR
und
er th
reat
of v
acan
cy:
E:
5
F:
Vu
lner
able
: un
der r
epai
r, us
er id
entif
ied;
OR
func
tiona
lly re
dund
ant,
use
agre
ed, n
ot y
et im
plem
ente
d, w
ill be
take
n of
f reg
iste
r: F:
1
TO
TAL
96
Vuln
erab
le (
E,F)
:
6
At R
isk
(A, B
, C, D
):
90
N
o so
lutio
n (A
,C):
6
9 of
the
90 a
t ris
k =
77%
69=7
7%
No
solu
tion
in p
rosp
ect e
ven
thou
gh a
vac
ant b
uild
ing
capa
ble
of b
enef
icia
l use
:
34
of th
e 90
at r
isk
= 38
%
34
=38%
N
o m
aint
enan
ce s
olut
ion
in p
rosp
ect (
for a
n/a
stru
ctur
e in
capa
ble
of o
ccup
atio
n):
35
of th
e 90
at r
isk
= 39
%
35
=39%
TAR
GET
: B
AR
s to
be
activ
ely
purs
ued
in th
e pe
riod
to 3
1.3.
2011
Bui
ldin
gs a
t Ris
k in
Lee
ds –
no
long
er a
t ris
k / t
aken
off
regi
ster
– a
s at
31
Dec
embe
r 200
9
Stre
et
Stre
et N
ame
Bui
ldin
g N
ame
Loca
lity
LCC
G
rade
LB
No.
Ye
ar
CO
UN
T
No.
owne
d
re
mov
ed
(or w
ere)
A
bbey
Roa
d K
irkst
all A
bbey
K
irkst
all
█
I 46
4653
20
04-2
006
14
Bos
ton
Roa
d M
ickl
ethw
aite
Far
m
Wet
herb
y
II 34
1924
B
ulle
rthor
pe L
ane
Col
ton
Mill
C
olto
n █
II
4656
49
32
2 Bu
slin
gtho
rpe
Lane
C
arr M
ills
Busl
ingt
horp
e
II 46
5658
136
Bus
lingt
horp
e La
ne
Ent
ranc
e to
Car
r Mills
B
uslin
gtho
rpe
II
4656
57
Bus
lingt
horp
e La
ne
Wor
ksho
p to
Car
r Mills
B
uslin
gtho
rpe
II
4656
60
64
C
ardi
gan
Lane
Lo
dge
to B
urle
y P
ark
Bur
ley
█
II 46
5749
281A
C
hape
ltow
n R
oad
r/o S
ikh
Tem
ple
Pot
tern
ewto
n
II 46
5819
C
hurc
h W
ood
Ave
Th
e W
ater
Met
er H
ouse
Fa
r Hea
ding
ley
II
4658
79
Elm
et L
ane
Elm
et H
all
Rou
ndha
y █
II
4663
23
Har
roga
te R
oad
Har
ewoo
d C
astle
H
arew
ood
S
AM
/ I
4234
19
Man
ston
Lan
e La
zenc
roft
Farm
hous
e A
usth
orpe
█
II
4660
38
22
A–C
S
hire
Oak
Roa
d A
rncl
iffe
Hea
ding
ley
II
4653
00
Ves
per L
ane
Ves
per G
ate
at K
irkst
all A
bbey
K
irkst
all
█
II 46
5644
M
iddl
eton
Roa
d H
unsl
et C
emet
ery
Lodg
e H
unsl
et
█
II 46
6062
20
07
4
N
eptu
ne S
treet
D
yew
orks
& w
areh
ouse
E
ast S
treet
II 46
6098
90 /
92
Pot
tern
ewto
n La
ne
C
hape
l Alle
rton
II
4663
89
Woo
dhou
se L
ane
Trin
ity C
ongr
egat
iona
l Chu
rch
Woo
dhou
se
II
4657
86
Cha
pelto
wn
Roa
d Fo
rmer
offi
ces
Cen
tral L
et P
rope
rty M
anag
emen
t P
otte
rnew
ton
II
4658
26
2008
-200
9 10
G
ledh
ow L
ane
Out
build
ings
at G
ledh
ow H
all
Gle
dhow
II 46
5076
G
ledh
ow L
ane
Sta
bles
at G
ledh
ow H
all
Gle
dhow
II 46
5082
25
Kirk
gate
Otle
y
II 34
1442
M
ethl
ey L
ane
Ais
led
barn
, Clu
mpc
liffe
M
ethl
ey
II
3420
79
Nor
th G
rang
e M
ount
Nor
th H
ill H
ouse
H
eadi
ngle
y
II 46
6127
83A
O
tley
Roa
d
Hea
ding
ley
II
4662
02
39
& 4
0 P
ark
Squ
are
C
ity C
entre
II 46
5354
R
ound
hay
Par
k Lo
dges
to S
of g
ate
Rou
ndha
y P
ark
Rou
ndha
y
█
II 46
5203
Ti
the
Barn
Lan
e Tw
o ba
rns
atta
ched
r/o
Hill
Top
farm
hous
e Ba
rdse
y
II 34
2141
TO
TAL
28
Build
ings
at
Risk
in L
eeds
Str
ateg
y &
Reg
iste
r 20
09
OTHER HERITAGE at RISK in LEEDS Buildings are only one aspect of ‘heritage’, and English Heritage have set up the Yorkshire and the Humber Region HAR Register: www.english-heritage.org.uk/upload/pdf/190609yorkshire_2009_har_register.pdf Leeds entries in this are: Registered Parks and Gardens at Risk: High Royds (asylum grounds). Oulton Hall (parkland). Registered Battlefields at Risk: Adwalton Moor Battlefield near Drighlington, Morley. Conservation Areas at Risk: To study these, applying revised English Heritage criteria, which are forthcoming, will require significant staff time. Scheduled Monuments at Risk: There are 13 archaeological sites at risk in Leeds. They comprise ‘non-structural’ scheduled monuments and therefore do not include Stank Hall Barn and Rothwell Castle. They are catalogued in the English Heritage HAR Register. BUILDINGS at RISK WEBSITES that give guidance and list publications: LEEDS CITY COUNCIL: www.leeds.gov.uk/conservation ENGLISH HERITAGE: www.english-heritage.org.uk/risk www.helm.org.uk LEEDS CIVIC TRUST: www.leedscivictrustr.org.uk/heritage SAVE BRITAIN’S HERITAGE: www.savebritainsheritage.org.uk The SOCIETY for the PRESERVATION of ANCIENT BUILDINGS: www.spab.org.uk The VICTORIAN SOCIETY: www.victoriansociety.org.uk The GEORGIAN GROUP: www.georgiangroup.org.uk CONTACT with Leeds City Council Conservation Team: Email: [email protected] Telephone: 0113 247 8147 Published in 2010 by: Sustainable Development Unit Planning and Sustainable Development Leeds City Council Leonardo Building 2 Rossington Street LEEDS LS2 8HD
13