bulgaria, latvia, lithuania and slovakia – comparison of industrial transition models economic...
TRANSCRIPT
Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania and Bulgaria, Latvia, Lithuania and Slovakia – Slovakia –
Comparison of industrial Comparison of industrial transition modelstransition models
Economic transformation Economic transformation process in Latviaprocess in Latvia
Acad. Raita KarnīteAcad. Raita Karnīte6-7 October 20086-7 October 2008
SofiaSofia
Economic transformation Economic transformation process in Latviaprocess in Latvia
• The evolution of industrial policyThe evolution of industrial policy
• Example of one highly successful policy Example of one highly successful policy measuremeasure
• Example of one less successful policy measureExample of one less successful policy measure
• Analysis of developments before and after EU Analysis of developments before and after EU accession, also in the light of Lisbon strategyaccession, also in the light of Lisbon strategy
• ConclusionsConclusions
The evolution of industrial policyThe evolution of industrial policy• Responsible institution – Ministry of Responsible institution – Ministry of Economics of the Republic of LatviaEconomics of the Republic of Latvia (also (also National Economic Council)National Economic Council)
• Large number of national level policy Large number of national level policy documents: several middle and long term documents: several middle and long term national development strategies, two national national development strategies, two national development plansdevelopment plans
• Sector policy documents – Conception on the Sector policy documents – Conception on the development of industrydevelopment of industry
• Small and medium size companies’ Small and medium size companies’ promotion policiespromotion policies and institutions (councils)and institutions (councils)
• Innovation policy, policy implementation planInnovation policy, policy implementation plan
• EU Structural fundsEU Structural funds
• Main focus – export oriented knowledge intensive industryMain focus – export oriented knowledge intensive industry
• MMost ost effective measure – educationeffective measure – education
• Supporting measures – export promotion (export Supporting measures – export promotion (export promotion institutions, export guarantee system)promotion institutions, export guarantee system)
• 5-7 priorities in research activities related to perspective 5-7 priorities in research activities related to perspective industry sectorsindustry sectors
• Innovation promotion institutions – technological parks, Innovation promotion institutions – technological parks, excellence centres, cooperation with scientific institutions, excellence centres, cooperation with scientific institutions, including Latvian Academy of Sciences and universitiesincluding Latvian Academy of Sciences and universities
• Financial support – EU FundsFinancial support – EU Funds
The evolution of industrial policyThe evolution of industrial policy• Special economic stimulus (tax regime, Special economic stimulus (tax regime, industrial subsidies) are not expectedindustrial subsidies) are not expected
• Supporting meSupporting meaasures moderate:sures moderate:
export promotion polexport promotion poliicies not implementedcies not implemented
investment promotion policies are not clearinvestment promotion policies are not clear
innovation policy measures focused on innovation policy measures focused on information technologies sectorinformation technologies sector and priorities in and priorities in sciencescience
effective financial support institutions (funds, effective financial support institutions (funds, business angels) are not developedbusiness angels) are not developed
Highly successful policy Highly successful policy measuresmeasures
• Wood processing industryWood processing industry
• Local resources Local resources • Good marketGood market• Fast privatisation and modernisation, but slow move to Fast privatisation and modernisation, but slow move to higher value added sectors higher value added sectors • Sufficient funding, intensive FDISufficient funding, intensive FDI• SufficiSufficieent supporting measures (the State Forest policy, nt supporting measures (the State Forest policy, activities of state owned company Latvijas Meži in securing activities of state owned company Latvijas Meži in securing timber resources) timber resources)
• IKT industryIKT industry• Traditions and skills from former industrial structureTraditions and skills from former industrial structure• Good education provide skilled personnelGood education provide skilled personnel• High technical level (starting from nothing)High technical level (starting from nothing)• Concepts of information society and Knowledge society Concepts of information society and Knowledge society provide secure market (state procurement is very provide secure market (state procurement is very importantimportant))
ResultsResultsWood processing industry in 2005 in % of Wood processing industry in 2005 in % of
total manufacturingtotal manufacturing
Manufacture of wood and wood products
Manufacture of furniture Total
Turnover 23.0 4.5 27.5
Value added 32.2 5.7 37.9
Gross investment 24.5 5.8 30.3
Employed 20.2 8.3 28.4
ResultsResults
ICT indicators
1999 2003 2006
Value added in % of total in Latvia 5 6 6
Total ICT value added (c.p.), mln. EUR 313 512 899
In % of ICT value added
ICT production 1 4 5
ICT trade 15 23 39
Telecommunications 70 61 42
ICT services 14 11 14
Foreign trade balance in ICT sector, mln.EUR -176 -256 -351
in % of total in Latvia 17 13 8
Foreign trade balance in sectors
Telecommunication equipment -67 -82 n.a.
Computers -57 -92 -92
Electronic components -15 -21 -64
Example of one lessExample of one less successful policy successful policy measuremeasure
Sugar industrySugar industry (three factories) destroyed: (three factories) destroyed:
Privatisation, concentration (one factory closed) Privatisation, concentration (one factory closed)
Before accession – supporting measures (Sugar Law, Before accession – supporting measures (Sugar Law, subsidies to farmers, market protection measures) - lot of subsidies to farmers, market protection measures) - lot of discussions but industry and supporting agriculture growsdiscussions but industry and supporting agriculture grows
In 2005 (after accession) – two remaining companies In 2005 (after accession) – two remaining companies voluntary closed due to economic stimulus voluntary closed due to economic stimulus
Sugar price ???Sugar price ???
ResultsResults
00
Analysis of developments before and after Analysis of developments before and after EU accession, EU accession,
also in the light of Lisbon strategyalso in the light of Lisbon strategy
GDP growth in selected countries, %GDP growth in selected countries, %
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
ES15/25/27 ASV Japāna Latvija Čehija Polija Ungārija
GDP level (1990 = 100)GDP level (1990 = 100)
89.6
58.4
49.7 50 49.6 51.354.6
62.6 64.468.8
74.178.8
84.5
91.8
101.5
113.6
125.7
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
GDP BY KIND OF ACTIVITY at constant prices of 2000
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
other community, social and personal service activities (O)
health and social work (N)
education (M)
public administration and defence; compulsory social security(L)
real estate, renting and business activities (K)
financial intermediation (J)
transport, storage and communications (I)
hotels and restaurants (H)
wholesale, retail trade; repair of motor vehicles, motorcycles,personal, household goods (G)
Construction (F)
Electricity, gas and water supply (E)
Manufacturing (D)
Mining and quarrying (C)
Fishing (B)
Agriculture, hunting and forestry (A)
Structure of GDP
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008Q1
A: Agricultire B: Fishing C: Mining and quarring D: Manufacturing
E: Electricity, gas and water supply F: Construction G.:O: Services Taxes minus subsidies
FDI by sectors, mln LVLFDI by sectors, mln LVL
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 IX
Mln.
LVL
Agriculture Fishing Industry Construction Trade Hotels and restaurants Transport
Finances Real estate State management Education Health care Communal services Not specif ied
Contribution to the growth, % points
-35.00
-30.00
-25.00
-20.00
-15.00
-10.00
-5.00
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
A: Agriculture, hunting, forestry B: Fishing C: Mining and quarryng D: Manufacturing
E: Elacticity, gas and water suply F: Construction G..O: Services
Gross industrial output indices by activity (at constant prices; 1990=100) Source: Statistical yearbook of Latvia 2005
41.4
55.8
29.8
7.9
22.2
26.6
64.7
8.8
49.1
35.1
100.1
27
132.8
27.7
34.9
22.3
37.8
97.1
47.4
10.2
10
56.4
21.9
259.1
24.9
314.3
26.1
166.1
93.2
510.2
6.8
53.3
38.4
53.6
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550
Manufacture of furniture; manufacturing n.e.c.
Manufacture of other transport equipment
Manufacture of motor vehicles, trailers and semi-trailers
Manufacture of radio, television and communication equipment
Manufacture of electrical machinery and aparatus
Manufacture of machinery and equipment
Manufacture of fabricated metal products
Manufacture of non-metallic mineral products
Manufacture of rubber and plastic products
Manufacture of chemical products and man-made fibres
Publishing, printing and reproduction of recorded media
Manufacture of pulp, paper and paper products
Manufacture of wood and wood products
Tanning and dressing of leather
Manufacture of wearing appeal
Manufacture of textiles
Manufacture of food products and beverages
1995 2004
Number of enterprises and number of employees in manufacturing
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Enterprises Employees (thsd)
Number of enterprises in manufacture by number of employed, 2004
10-4930.72 %
1979 companies
50-2499.50 %
612 companies
>2501.60 %
103 companies
0-9 58.19 %
3749 companies
0-9 10-49 50-249 >250
Latvia’s current accountLatvia’s current account
-4000
-3500
-3000
-2500
-2000
-1500
-1000
-500
0
500
1000
1995 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007
Goods Services Income
Current transfers Current account
Share of selected sectors, 2005
11.8 12.416.1
20.7
2.29 2.55 3.71N/A
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
60.0
70.0
80.0
90.0
100.0
Turnover Production value Value added Employed
Sectors in % of total in industry Sectors in % of total in economy
Labour productivity in selected sectors
12202
6511
22186
19065
23882
13425
28333
17034
12952
4750
2978
10372
9097
7824
5205
7444
4915
7524
N/ A
N/ A
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000 30000
Manufacture of textiles
Manufacture of wearing apparel
Manufacture of chemicals and chemical products
Manufacture of computer, electronic and optical products
Manufacture of electrical equipment
Manufacture of machinery and equipment n.e.c.;
Manufacture of motor vehicles, trailers and semi-trailers
Manufacture of other transport equipment
Repair and installation of machinery and equipment
Water collection, treatment and supply
Waste collection, treatment and disposal activities; materials recovery
Production value per worker Value added per worker
Value added in % of turnover in selected sectors
39
46
47
48
33
39
26
29
58
N/A
N/A
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Manufacture of textiles
Manufacture of wearing apparel
Manufacture of chemicals and chemicalproducts
Manufacture of computer, electronicand optical products
Manufacture of electrical equipment
Manufacture of machinery andequipment n.e.c.;
Manufacture of motor vehicles, trailersand semi-trailers
Manufacture of other transportequipment
Repair and installation of machinery andequipment
Water collection, treatment and supply
Waste collection, treatment anddisposal activities; materials recovery
ConclusionsConclusions• Latvian industry is underdeveloped, but its potential is not Latvian industry is underdeveloped, but its potential is not
exhaustedexhausted
• Industrial policies are elaborated, but implementation is not Industrial policies are elaborated, but implementation is not sufficient sufficient
• Supporting financial and organisational measures are poorSupporting financial and organisational measures are poor
• Industry needs special attention, probably, also special Industry needs special attention, probably, also special responsible institutionresponsible institution
• Collateral indirect policies would be welcomed (ex. support Collateral indirect policies would be welcomed (ex. support to entrance in the local and global military markets) to entrance in the local and global military markets)
Thank you Thank you for your attentionfor your attention