Upload File

bulletin board guidelines for evaluation

2
Dear Mr. / Ms. _______________ Site: _____________ Date: ___________ Topic: ______________________________________________________________ __ TO EVALUATE THIS BULLETIN BOARD, LET’S TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE FOLLOWING ASPECTS: PRESENTATION: POOR : The BB display lacks of color and clear organization or it does not follow the suggested parts in the BB policy: editorial, body of the display and miscellany. FAIR : The BB display is attractive to be seen but it is not organized according to the BB Policy (editorial, body of the display and miscellany). GOOD : The BB display is attractive to be seen and well organized following the BB Policy. CONTENT: POOR : The articles displayed in the BB do not show deep thinking, creativity and authenticity with a lot of problems in the use of the target language. FAIR : The articles displayed in the BB show deep thinking and creativity, but the ones which were downloaded from a web page do not mention the source. GOOD : The articles displayed in the BB show deep thinking and authenticity with an appropriate use of the language according to the students’ level. If the article was downloaded from a web page, the source is mentioned. THANKS A LOT FOR YOUR SUPPORT. ACADEMIC COORDINATION Dear Mr. / Ms. _______________ Site: _____________ Date: ___________ Topic: ______________________________________________________________ __ TO EVALUATE THIS BULLETIN BOARD, LET’S TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE FOLLOWING ASPECTS: PRESENTATION: POOR : The BB display lacks of color and clear organization or it does not follow the suggested parts in the BB policy: editorial, body of the display and miscellany. FAIR : The BB display is attractive to be seen but it is not organized according to the BB Policy (editorial, body of the display and miscellany). GOOD : The BB display is attractive to be seen and well organized following the BB Policy. CONTENT: POOR : The articles displayed in the BB do not show deep thinking, creativity and authenticity with a lot of problems in the use of the target language. FAIR : The articles displayed in the BB show deep thinking and creativity, but the ones which were downloaded from a web page do not mention the source. GOOD : The articles displayed in the BB show deep thinking and authenticity with an appropriate use of the language according to the students’ level. If the article was downloaded from a web page, the source is mentioned. THANKS A LOT FOR YOUR SUPPORT. ACADEMIC COORDINATION Dear Mr. / Ms. _______________ Site: _____________ Date: ___________ Topic: ______________________________________________________________ __ TO EVALUATE THIS BULLETIN BOARD, LET’S TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE FOLLOWING ASPECTS: PRESENTATION:

Upload: learnerivan

Post on 11-Jul-2016

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

Report

DESCRIPTION

icpna

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Bulletin Board Guidelines for Evaluation

Dear Mr. / Ms. _______________ Site: _____________ Date: ___________Topic: ________________________________________________________________

TO EVALUATE THIS BULLETIN BOARD, LET’S TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE FOLLOWING ASPECTS:PRESENTATION: POOR : The BB display lacks of color and clear organization or it does not follow the

suggested parts in the BB policy: editorial, body of the display and miscellany. FAIR : The BB display is attractive to be seen but it is not organized according to the BB

Policy (editorial, body of the display and miscellany). GOOD : The BB display is attractive to be seen and well organized following the BB Policy.CONTENT:

POOR : The articles displayed in the BB do not show deep thinking, creativity and authenticity with a lot of problems in the use of the target language.FAIR : The articles displayed in the BB show deep thinking and creativity, but the ones which were downloaded from a web page do not mention the source.GOOD : The articles displayed in the BB show deep thinking and authenticity with an appropriate use of the language according to the students’ level. If the article was downloaded from a web page, the source is mentioned.

THANKS A LOT FOR YOUR SUPPORT.ACADEMIC COORDINATION

Dear Mr. / Ms. _______________ Site: _____________ Date: ___________Topic: ________________________________________________________________

TO EVALUATE THIS BULLETIN BOARD, LET’S TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE FOLLOWING ASPECTS:PRESENTATION: POOR : The BB display lacks of color and clear organization or it does not follow the

suggested parts in the BB policy: editorial, body of the display and miscellany. FAIR : The BB display is attractive to be seen but it is not organized according to the BB

Policy (editorial, body of the display and miscellany). GOOD : The BB display is attractive to be seen and well organized following the BB Policy.CONTENT:

POOR : The articles displayed in the BB do not show deep thinking, creativity and authenticity with a lot of problems in the use of the target language.FAIR : The articles displayed in the BB show deep thinking and creativity, but the ones which were downloaded from a web page do not mention the source.GOOD : The articles displayed in the BB show deep thinking and authenticity with an appropriate use of the language according to the students’ level. If the article was downloaded from a web page, the source is mentioned.

THANKS A LOT FOR YOUR SUPPORT.ACADEMIC COORDINATION

Dear Mr. / Ms. _______________ Site: _____________ Date: ___________Topic: ________________________________________________________________

TO EVALUATE THIS BULLETIN BOARD, LET’S TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE FOLLOWING ASPECTS:PRESENTATION: POOR : The BB display lacks of color and clear organization or it does not follow the

suggested parts in the BB policy: editorial, body of the display and miscellany. FAIR : The BB display is attractive to be seen but it is not organized according to the BB

Policy (editorial, body of the display and miscellany). GOOD : The BB display is attractive to be seen and well organized following the BB Policy.CONTENT:

POOR : The articles displayed in the BB do not show deep thinking, creativity and authenticity with a lot of problems in the use of the target language.FAIR : The articles displayed in the BB show deep thinking and creativity, but the ones which were downloaded from a web page do not mention the source.GOOD : The articles displayed in the BB show deep thinking and authenticity with an appropriate use of the language according to the students’ level. If the article was downloaded from a web page, the source is mentioned.

THANKS A LOT FOR YOUR SUPPORT.ACADEMIC COORDINATION

Dear Mr. / Ms. _______________ Site: _____________ Date: ___________Topic: ________________________________________________________________

TO EVALUATE THIS BULLETIN BOARD, LET’S TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE FOLLOWING ASPECTS:PRESENTATION: POOR : The BB display lacks of color and clear organization or it does not follow the

suggested parts in the BB policy: editorial, body of the display and miscellany. FAIR : The BB display is attractive to be seen but it is not organized according to the BB

Policy (editorial, body of the display and miscellany). GOOD : The BB display is attractive to be seen and well organized following the BB Policy.CONTENT:

POOR : The articles displayed in the BB do not show deep thinking, creativity and authenticity with a lot of problems in the use of the target language.FAIR : The articles displayed in the BB show deep thinking and creativity, but the ones which were downloaded from a web page do not mention the source.GOOD : The articles displayed in the BB show deep thinking and authenticity with an appropriate use of the language according to the students’ level. If the article was downloaded from a web page, the source is mentioned.

THANKS A LOT FOR YOUR SUPPORT.ACADEMIC COORDINATION

Page 2: Bulletin Board Guidelines for Evaluation

France Guidelines HE Evaluation

Faculty Evaluation Guidelines

Tender Evaluation Guidelines Procurement of Goods or · PDF fileTender Evaluation Guidelines Procurement of Goods or Works ... Tender Evaluation Guidelines Procurement of Goods or

Portfolio Evaluation Guidelines

Evaluation Guidelines Tier II v0

Population Evaluation Guidelines

Mental Health Bulletin, July 2008...Guidelines current awareness bulletin October 2019 C Denoon, NHSGGC Library Network 1 Guidelines Octo The bulletin is intended as an information

ODA Evaluation Guidelines - OECDODA Evaluation Guidelines 7th Edition (tentative translation) ODA Evaluation Division ... evaluation as "the systematic and objective assessment of

ILO policy guidelines for results-based evaluation · ILO Policy Guidelines for Results-Based Evaluation Introduction These ILO evaluation guidelines are written for any ILO staff

Disability Evaluation Guidelines

Disinfectants Evaluation Guidelines

Guidelines Tech Economic Evaluation

Evaluation Guidelines of PCR Evaluation Note and PPER

Guidelines on economic evaluation

libraryarchives.metro.netlibraryarchives.metro.net/...transportation-systems-evaluation-guidelines-january.pdfAdvanced Public Transportation Systems: Evaluation Guidelines Final Report

Eduardo Salete Casino Tecopysa...2019/11/25  · ICOLD Bulletin 148: Selecting seismic parameters for large dams - Guidelines (revision of Bulletin 72): “the Safety Evaluation Earthquake

North Dakota Teacher Evaluation Guidelines North Dakota Teacher Evaluation Guidelines North Dakota Teacher Evaluation Guidelines Preface: A Statement of State Policy It is the constitutional

ODA Evaluation Guidelines - OECD · ODA Evaluation Guidelines 7th Edition (tentative translation) ODA Evaluation Division ... evaluation as "the systematic and objective assessment

National Register Bulletin 24: Guidelines for Local Surveys

NBA Evaluation Guidelines

Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context …nbaind.org/files/evaluation-guidelines-tier-ii-v0.pdf · Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed

Guidelines for the self-evaluation: evaluation programme ... · Evaluation Programme for Affiliated Institutions. Guidelines for the self -evaluation. V2.0 | 9 . 1.3. The organisation

ODA EVALUATION GUIDELINES ODA Evaluation Guidelines...The ODA Evaluation Guidelines was first released as principles of MOFA’s ODA evaluation in 2003, based on national and international

1997 Documentation Guidelines for Evaluation and …emuniversity.com/1997.pdf · 2014-09-15 · 1997 Documentation Guidelines for Evaluation ... 1997 DOCUMENTATION GUIDELINES FOR

Evaluation policy and guidelines for evaluations · 5 Evaluation policy and guidelines for evaluations This document describes the evaluation policy and guidelines for evaluations

Guidelines for Evaluation of Judicial Training Practices Guidelines for Evaluation of... · Judicial Training Methods Guidelines for Evaluation of Judicial Training Practices With

Practice Guidelines Acog Bulletin 102

Project Evaluation Guidelines - NYU

Learning Resource Evaluation Guidelines

Guidance note B – Evaluation guidelines€¦ · Guidance note B – Evaluation guidelines This guidance note presents the guidelines for ongoing evaluation of rural development

Faculty Evaluation Guidelines - MSU Denver€¦ · Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences Faculty Evaluation Guidelines ... As with Faculty Evaluation in ... activities

Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to ...nbaind.org/files/Evaluation guidelines PG Mangmt.pdf · Evaluation Guidelines with indicative exhibits/context to be Observed/Assessed

Re: Community Priority Evaluation Guidelines September 7th, 2013newgtlds.icann.org/en/applicants/cpe/guidelines-comment... · Re: Community Priority Evaluation Guidelines September

Futuro Classico Evaluation Guidelines...Futuro Classico Evaluation Guidelines and Checklist – Jan 2016 0 Futuro Classico Evaluation Guidelines The Futuro Classico is an evaluation

B324 Evaluation Guidelines