bunch length dependence of plasma wakefield accelerators
TRANSCRIPT
1
Bunch Length Dependence ofPlasma Wakefield Accelerators
A Proposal for a User Experimenton the ATF User Facility at the
Brookhaven National Laboratory
Submitted byThomas Katsouleas (PI) and Patrick Muggli (Co-PI)
University of Southern California, Los Angeles
P. Muggli, BNL/CAP 1-2/6/2000
2
OUTLINE
P. Muggli, BNL/CAP 1-2/6/2000
- Motivation for this work
- Plasma Wakefield Accelerator (PWFA) scaling law
- Why ATF?
- Description of the experiment & plan
- Diagnostics and measurements
- Proposed schedule
3
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
LivingstonCurrent statusfuture
Log
of E
nerg
y in
MeV
Year
RAL/IC/UCLA/LULI NRL, UM
UCLA
UCLA Port J. LLNL/UCLA
?
SLAC/USC/UCLA/LBL
LEP
P. Muggli, BNL/CAP 1-2/6/2000
MOTIVATION
PWFA?
4
- Transverse dynamics (E-157)- Betatron oscillations- e- beam tail motion
- Hose instability- Limits the propagation/acceleration length- Limits the accelerating gradient
- Long plasma production- Meter long, homogeneous plasmas (E-157)
- Acceleration scaling law
P. Muggli, BNL/CAP 1-2/6/2000
PWFA KEY ISSUES
5
P. Muggli, BNL/CAP 1-2/6/2000
WHAT DO WE PROPOSE?
We propose to measure the parametric dependenciesof the PWFA gradient:
eE ≅ 70MeV / mNb
1010
1.0
σ z (mm)
2
λp ≅ 4σ zwith
Q=0-1nC, Nb=0-7·109 e-
τ=σz/c=1-10ps
n0=1013-1015
Never measured before!
6
Physical Principles of the PlasmaPhysical Principles of the Plasma Wakefield Wakefield Accelerator Accelerator
• Space charge of drive beam displaces plasma electrons
•• Transformer ratio
•• Wake Phase Velocity = Beam Velocity (like wake on a boat)
•• Plasma ions exert restoring force => Space charge oscillations
E Ezacc dec beam. .
• Wake amplitude ∝ N b zσ 2 ( for 4σ z ≈ λp ∝1
no
)
++++++++++++++ ++++++++++++++++
----- --- ----------------
--------------
--------- ----
--- -------------------- - --
---- - -- ---
------ -
- -- ---- - - - - - ------ - -
- - - - --- --
- -- - - - - -
---- - ----
------
electronbeam
+ + + + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + ++ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + +-
- --
--- --
EzEz
P. Muggli, BNL/CAP 1-2/6/2000
7
P. Muggli, BNL/CAP 1-2/6/2000
WAKE FIELD AMPLITUDE
eE(eV / cm) = n0 (cm−3 )nb
n0
kpσ ze− kp
2σ z2 2
1+ 1 kp2σ r
2Linear Theory:*
The maximum gradient is given by:
with a plasma density corresponding to: 2σ z ≅π
cω p
or λp ≅ 4σ z
eE ≅ 70MeV / mNb
1010
1.0
σ z (mm)
2
and scale as 1/σz2 ! -50
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 5 1014 1 1015 1.5 1015 2 1015 2.5 1015
eE (
MeV
/m)
n0 (cm-3)
*S. Lee et al., Phys. Rev. E, May 2000
8
P. Muggli, BNL/CAP 1-2/6/2000
ACCELERATING STRUCTURE
2-D non-linear PIC numerical simulation
E-157 PWFA : ne=2·1014 cm-3-> f=127GHz
9
P. Muggli, BNL/CAP 1-2/6/2000
WAKE FIELD AMPLITUDE
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
106
107
108
109
1010
0 5 10 15
PeakField&Npart(PlasDens).data
Peak
Acc
eler
atin
g Fi
eld
(GeV
/m)
Num
ber of Particles
Plasma Density (× 10-14 cm-3)
2-D non-linear PIC simulation for E-157:
Nb=4·1010 e-
σz=0.6mmσr=70µmγ=60000
no≈2.1·1014 cm-3
λp≈4σz
Check!
10
σz [mm]
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
0 0.2 0.4 0.6
E1 [
GeV
/m]
N = 4e10 e-
σr = 75 µm
n0 optimum
P. Muggli, BNL/CAP 1-2/6/2000
ACCELERATING FIELD (E1)vs. BUMNCH LENGTH
2-D cylindrical, non-linear simulation
Numerical simulations confirm linear result: eE∝1/σz2
Check!
11
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
-150
-100
-50
0
50
100
150
200
0 5 10 15 20
ATF-Wake.data
n0/n
beE
z (MeV
/m)
(z-ct)c/ωp
P. Muggli, BNL/CAP 1-2/6/2000
SIMULATION FOR ATF2-D fully non-linear simulation (NOVA code)
Q=1nC, σz=300µm, σr=100µm, n0=2·1014 cm-3
eE≈160MeV/m, δn/n0=0.12
12
- High quality e- beam
- High current e- beam
- Variable e- bunch length (σz)
- TW synchronized CO2 laser for plasma production/diagnosis
P. Muggli, BNL/CAP 1-2/6/2000
WHY ATF?
13
P. Muggli, BNL/CAP 1-2/6/2000
EXPERIMENTAL PLAN
ATF e- beam0.1,1ps ≤ τ ≤ 10ps
Q ≤ 1nC
Multi-TWATF CO2 laserI>1014 Wcm-2
over a few cmH gas cell
0.01T≤P≤1Tor
Li sourceArF laser
Diagnostics:- Thomson scattering- Plasma light- Radiation at fp
Q=1nC eE (MeV/m) ne (cm-3)
τ=1ps
τ=10ps
160
1.6
7.8·1014
7.8·1012
Plan: Vary ne for each σz (or τ), and Q (or Nb)
14
P. Muggli, BNL/CAP 1-2/6/2000
PLASMA SOURCE
- Field ionized H or He static fill
- requires CO2 laser pulse with I>1014 W cm-2 over a few cm (TW ATF upgrade)
- fully ionized
- plasma density determined from gas pressure
- Lithium plasma source
- requires ArF Excimer laser
- large dimensions plasma
15
Pscatt
Pinc .
=π2
n0
ncrit
δn
n0
L
λ
2
- Scattered power:
- Compare to the UCLA Mars case:
δn/n0=0.3 (eE=3GeV/m, ne=1016 cm-3), λ=0.5µm, n0/ncrit≈2.2·10-6, L≈200µm
δn/n0=0.1 (eE=160MeV/m, ne=2·1014 cm-3), λ=10.6µm , n0/ncrit ≈7.8·10-5, L≈2cm
Pscatt
Pinc .
≈ 30Pscatt
Pinc . UCLA
- Laser light scatters on the plasma wake (grating)
P. Muggli, BNL/CAP 1-2/6/2000
THOMSON SCATTERING
(at k-matching)
- Frequency shift: ωs=ω±ωp or 130GHz @ ne=2·1014 cm-3
Spectrograph can resolve ∆ν ≈ 10GHz
16
P. Muggli, BNL/CAP 1-2/6/2000
THOMSON SCATTERINGMars Laboratory, UCLA:
space and time resolved Thomson scattering
ne≈1016 cm-3
λ=0.5µmL≈200µm
0.00 0.23 0.33 0.40 0.46 0.52
4
0
-4
-8
-10 -5 0 5 10
Position (mm)
20
100
120
40
60
80
(a)
(b)
0 100 200 300 (ps)
Beat Wave Amplitude (n1 /no )
Am
plitu
dePo
sitio
n (m
m)
Parameters:
17
e- BeamOnly
Laser/PlasmaOnly
e- Beam+
Plasma
P. Muggli, BNL/CAP 1-2/6/2000
PLASMA LIGHTFROM WAKE DISSIPATION
(Preliminary E-157 result*)
* P. Catravas et al., in prep.
UV
e-
view
Li Vapor
Plasma Light
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0.1 1 10
PlasmaLight.dataPlas
ma
Lig
ht D
iode
Sig
nal (
mV
)
Incident UV Energy (mJ)
18
P. Muggli, BNL/CAP 1-2/6/2000
PLASMA RADIATION AT fp
- With ne in the 1014 cm-3 range, fp≈100GHz range
- Large amplitude plasma waves are excited
- Plasma waves do not couple efficiently to vacuum modes
- Detect leakage of plasma radiation at fp
19
CO2 Light toThomson Scattering
Radiationat ωp
TW CO2
Laser Pulse
FocusedATF
e- Beam
FocusingOAP
Gas Cell
Plasma LightMeasurement
Plasma
P. Muggli, BNL/CAP 1-2/6/2000
SCHEMATIC OF THE EXPERIMENT
20
P. Muggli, BNL/CAP 1-2/6/2000
PROPOSED SCHEDULE
- Experiment extends over 2-3 years, with 1 or 2 runs/year
- Each run is 3-4 weeks
- Each run is preceded by >4 weeks of off line preparation
- However, will accommodate ATF schedule
21
- Use unique ATF capabilities to measure the wake amplitude scaling with respect to the e- bunch length (eE∝1/σz
2)
- Use a field-ionized H plasma or a lithium plasma source
- Measure wake amplitude as a fct of σz, Nb, and n0 using:
- Thompson scattering of CO2 laser pulse- Plasma light produced by dissipation of the wake- Radiation at ωp from the plasma (µwave)
- Parameters:- Q≤1nC- σz=1ps eE=160MeV/m n0≈7.8·1014 cm-3
- σz=10ps eE=1.6MeV/m n0 ≈7.8·1012 cm-3
P. Muggli, BNL/CAP 1-2/6/2000
EXPERIMENTAL PLAN