buried cone, buried layer titan, august 2008 shotdpthenrgy hopg imager # (um)main (j) pp requested...
TRANSCRIPT
Buried cone, buried layer Titan, August 2008
Shot Dpth Enrgy HOPG Imager
# (um) main (J)
pp requested (mJ)
Pp measured ASE//Spike (mV)
Integrated
Max Bkgnd - foil
Bkgnd - image
Radius fwhm
Itnegrated over foil
14s3 20 157 0 6//10 649 -- -- -- --
19s7 50 142 0 7//0 429 7.9 e6 6.8 e2 8.2 e2 5.5 e2 4.8 e1 3.9 e7
20s6 100 119 0 5//7 400 4.0 e6 3.0 e2 4.6 e2 2.3 e2 5.4 e1 3.3 e7
21s1 50 135 400 1400//0 4.2 e6 2.8 e2 4.8 e2 2.5 e2 5.4 e1 3.2 e7
21s2 50 122 100 N//a 6.4 e6 4.3 e2 5.1 e2 2.5 e2 5.7 e1 3.8 e7
21s3 50 123 50 210(2ns)//0
2.7 e6 2.1 e2 3.2 e2 1.6 e2 5.3 e1 2.1 e7
21s4 50 135 400 Bad trigger
1.3 e6 8.6 e1 2.6 e2 1.7 e2 5.6 e1 1.1 e7
21s5 50 128 0 5//10 5.8 e6 7.7 e2 6.8 e2 4.3 e2 3.4 e1 3.4 e7
21s6 50 135 30 175//0 8.1 e6 6.7 e2 6.4 e2 2.7 e2 4.9 e1 4.8 e7
21s7 50 127 50 5//7 5.6 e6 8.8 e1 7.2 e2 4.2 e2 2.8 e1 3.8 e7
Buried cone buried layer comments
• Is it possible laser didn’t hit bottom every time?– Intrinsic prepulse -- 19s7, 21s5 - the latter has very well defined
peak. Former much broader.
– 50 mJ prepulse -- 21s3, 21s6, 21s7 have -- peak definition improves with later shots.
• Some of the well-defined spots weren‘t in the center of the foil. The foils don’t seem to be offset that much - see 21s5,7. Need to work out relationship of x-radiographs to target images to check.
• Foil is not much larger than peak - but checked measuring routine against lineouts, and find results OK.
19s7 Bur 50 m #1
• Target #1• Image blurred by 30 pixels for
peak measurement.• Foil 350 m across => 1 pixel =
3 m• Images 460 pixels across• Lineout suggests bkgnd 8 e2
5 pixel blur 30 pixel blur
FWHM
Profile
X-radiograph
20s6 Bur 100 m #1
• Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement.
• Foil 350 m across => 1 pixel = 3 m• Images 460 pixels across• Edge is noticeably lit up, but doesn’t
have a significant number of counts• Linout suggests bkgnd 5.5 e2
5 pixel blur 30 pixel blur
FWHM
Profile
X-radiograph
21s1 Bur 50 m #2
• Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement.
• Foil 350 m across => 1 pixel = 3 m• Images 460 pixels across• Lineout suggests 5 e2 bkgnd
5 pixel blur 30 pixel blur
FWHM
Profile
X-radiograph
21s2 Bur 50 m #3
• Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement.
• Foil 350 m across => 1 pixel = 3 m
• Images 460 pixels across• Lineout suggests bkgnd 5 e2
5 pixel blur 30 pixel blur
FWHM
Profile
X-radiograph
21s3 Bur 50 m #4
• Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement.
• Foil 350 m across => 1 pixel = 3 m• Images 460 pixels across• Lineout suggests bkgnd 3 e2
5 pixel blur 30 pixel blur
FWHM
Profile
X-radiograph
21s4 Bur 50 m #5
• Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement.
• Foil 350 m across => 1 pixel = 3 m• Images 460 pixels across• Lineout shows 3 e2 foil intensity
5 pixel blur 30 pixel blur
FWHM
Profile
X-radiograph
21s5 Bur 50 m #6
• Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement.
• Foil 350 m across => 1 pixel = 3 m
• Images 460 pixels across• Lineout suggets bkgnd 7 e2
5 pixel blur 30 pixel blur
FWHM
Profile
X-radiograph
21s6 Bur 50 m #7
• Image blurred by 30 pixels for peak measurement.
• Foil 350 m across => 1 pixel = 3 m
• Images 460 pixels across• Lineout suggests bkgnd 6.5 e2
5 pixel blur 30 pixel blur
FWHM
Profile
X-radiograph