business and human rights 2 case studies india and ivory coast sciences po – 24 mars 2013 amnesty...
DESCRIPTION
Human rights consequences Right to health (women) Right to a clean and healthy environment Right to work Most of those affected were very poor, and the effects of the gas leak caused them to lose their principal or only source of income Many families lost their main wage earners. Livestock owned by families died. Chronic illness and mental distress affected the capacity of many to work and earn their livelihoods. Women often bore the additional burden, sleeping very little due to an increased workload alongside household duties, childcare and care for relatives whose health had been impaired by the gas leak. Right to an effective remedy Intervention à Sciences Po – 24 mars 2013TRANSCRIPT
Business and human rights
2 case studies
India and Ivory Coast
Sciences Po – 24 mars 2013
Amnesty International France
India, 1984
Intervention Sciences Po – 24 mars 2013
Shortly before midnight on the 2 December 1984 approximately 54 pounds of methyl isocyanate (MIC) and other products leaked into the atmosphere from Union Carbide’s pesticide plant in Bhopal
Between 7,000 and 10,000 women, men and children died in the immediate aftermath of the leak, and a further. 15,000 died in the following months and years
More than 25 years later, the site has not been cleaned up
more than 100,000 people continue to suffer from health problems without the medical care they need, and survivors are still awaiting fair compensation and full redress for their suffering.
© R
avee
ndra
n/AF
P/Ge
ttyIm
ages
Human rights consequences Right to health (women) Right to a clean and healthy environment Right to work
Most of those affected were very poor, and the effects of the gas leak caused them to lose their principal or only source of income
Many families lost their main wage earners. Livestock owned by families died. Chronic illness and mental distress affected the capacity of many to work and
earn their livelihoods. Women often bore the additional burden, sleeping very little due to an increased
workload alongside household duties, childcare and care for relatives whose health had been impaired by the gas leak.
Right to an effective remedy
Intervention à Sciences Po – 24 mars 2013
Côte d’Ivoire, 2006 20th of August in the morning, inhabitants
of Abidjan wakes up : headaches Skin irritations Breath problems Medical centers overwelhmed (100.000
people consulted medical centers) 15 or 17 people deceaded
In late 2005 Trafigura decided to buy large amounts of unrefined petroleum called coker naphtha from PMI Trading Ltd, which is the commercial arm of Mexico’s state-owned petroleum company, PEMEX. Trafigura intended to use the coker naphtha as a cheap blendstock for fuels. They decided to refine the oil themselves
Trafigura is the world’s third largest independent oil trader. It handles every element involved in the sourcing and trading of crude oil, petroleum products, …for industrial consumers (BP, Total, Shell, Chevron..)
Trafigura Beheer BV is the group holding company, incorporated in the Netherlands. Trafigura Ltd. is based in London and acts as the coordinating entity for a substantial proportion of the group’s oil operations. Puma Energy Côte d’Ivoire is Trafigura’s wholly owned subsidiary in Côte d’Ivoire
Londres : siège opérationnel
Amsterdam: adresse fiscale
Lucerne : siège social
How the waste was created
The journey of the waste: Probo Koala
More than 500m3 of waste higtly toxic was stored
• It was owned by a company based in the Marshall Island
• sailed under the Panamanian flag
• Trafigura time-chartered (a form of lease
• The Probo Koala was under the control of its master, Captain Chertov – from the Ukraine
• A Greek-based company, appears to have played
• the role of management company for the ship at the time of the event
Dumping in AbidjanTrafigura finds a sub-
contractor compagnie Tommy
Tommy accepted to « discharge » slops and not to treat it…
The Compagnie Tommy received its licence to operate one month before the dumping (at the time where the boat was refused in Amsterdam)
Human rights consequences Right to food, environment, health Right to life, to work Right to information Right to an effective remedy
Amnesty International’s analysis • Some transnational corporations are involved in human rights abuses and
violations. • However, they are not subjects of international law. • They have a much power than individuals and populations but they
determine their lives • they have a much stronger legal protection : they often use complex legal
arrangements (Parent companies, subsidiaries, etc.) that make them opaque and it is difficult to identify those who truly control the operations
• States fail to protect victims of harmful actions of transnational corporations• Rights’ holders do not have access to essential information