business strategy for lawyers chapter 1: framework prof. amitai aviram [email protected]...

53
Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram [email protected] University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram. All Rights Reserved S14D

Upload: brent-farmer

Post on 25-Dec-2015

225 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Business Strategy for LawyersChapter 1:

FrameworkProf. Amitai [email protected]

University of Illinois College of LawCopyright © Amitai Aviram. All Rights Reserved

S14D

Page 2: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

FrameworkOverview of Chapter 1

a) Introduction to BSLb) What is business strategy?c) Business intelligenced) The value pool

© Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.2

Page 3: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Introduction to BSLWhat this course is/isn’t about

• No law (!!!)– Course is about how firms behave to maximize their profits

• Some such behavior can violate the law (e.g., antitrust)– Course will give you a deeper understanding

of how businesspeople think• Your clients• You (if you’re a partner/solo practitioner)• The businesses you oversee (if you’re a regulator)

• But not a business school course either…– Business strategy for lawyers– This course does not prepare you to be CEOs– It prepares you to either be:

• Regulators; or• Lawyers representing corporate clients before regulators

3 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 4: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Introduction to BSLWhat this course is/isn’t about

• What does that mean?– Consider both individual firm & market-wide impact

• CEO focuses only on own firm, subject to legal constraints• Regulator interprets/enforces law, so “subject to legal constraints” would

lead to circular thinking– Emphasis on present analysis, not future predictions

• CEO sets firm’s course• Regulator makes decisions based on existing market conditions (& defend

in court if challenged, so solid evidence is required)

4 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 5: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Introduction to BSLWhat this course is/isn’t about

• This is not a course about picking good stocks– Fundamental analysis of investments does require knowledge of

business strategy, but it also requires assessing what is the firm’s value

– But the analysis we use can help strategize your career• So what is the course about? (i.e. what is strategy?)

– Creating/maintaining a fit between the strategic environment & firm’s strategic traits (applying strengths to opportunities), in order to best achieve the firm’s goals

– More about this in the “What is strategy?” section (BSL 1c)

5 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 6: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Introduction to BSLThe challenges of studying BSL

• Dealing with uncertainty– Law classes tend to assume a lot of certainty about the analytic process (e.g., a

given test determines if X is liable)– But real life (including legal practice) is not nearly as certain – e.g., no rules &

no analytical process that ensures business success– A good analytical process helps focus on the issues that are likely to be the

more relevant to success & identify tradeoffs between those issues• Collecting information (business intelligence)

– Law classes tend to provide you with the relevant information– But in real life, unless you have the power to subpoena information, you need

to think of creative proxies for the information you actually need– In this course, creative ways to collect information are a big part of the grading

of your market analysis & team activities

6 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 7: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Introduction to BSLGrading

• Market analysis report– Expected length: 10 pages or more– You pick the market you analyze

• Students often pick either a market they are customers of, had worked in, or plan to work in (e.g., bankruptcy practice in northwest Illinois)

• Grade adjustments– For:

• Attendance & participation in class discussion• Participation in & quality of team activities

– Up to 1 grade-point up, unlimited adjustment down• However, an upwards or downwards adjustment of more than ⅓ of a grade

point (e.g., from B+ to A-) is rare

7 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 8: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Introduction to BSLMarket analysis report

• Select your market ASAP, so you can think of each new class through the lens of your market– And figure out what information you’ll need to get– Key criteria: experience, interest & availability of information

• Quality criteria– Analysis (thoughtful application of analytical tools studied in this course)– Business intelligence (creative ways of collecting information)

• All sources of info must be clearly referenced• Doesn’t qualify for ULWR credit• Due on April 26 (Friday of the last full week of classes)

– Submit the paper by e-mail, as MS-Word (.doc or .docx) file– Last class of the course (Monday, April 29) is cancelled; make-up will be

announced

8 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 9: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Introduction to BSLGetting more information

• Slides, course outline & syllabus are posted and regularly updated on my website– http://www.law.illinois.edu/aviram/

• Talking to me outside of class– Please e-mail prior to meeting with me

• Suggest when you would like to meet(not limited to office hours)

• Describe what you want to talk about– E-mail: [email protected]– Room 326

9 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 10: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Introduction to BSLDefining commonly-used terms

• Product: a good or a service• Market: set of products that are close substitutes for each other• Firm: a business that is involved in creating, modifying or

distributing products (regardless of its legal status)• Rivals (of a given firm): Other firms that participate in the same

market(s) – i.e., other firms that sell products that are close substitutes to products of the given firm

• Producers (re a given firm): firm + its rivals• Supplier (of a given firm): person selling raw materials to firm• Customer (of a given firm): person buying product from firm– Customer may consume product or use it as raw material in its business– Consumer: a customer who buys a product for personal use, rather than as

raw material to produce & sell something

10 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 11: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

FrameworkOverview of Chapter 1

a) Introduction to BSLb) What is business strategy?c) Business intelligenced) The value pool

© Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.11

Page 12: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

What is business strategy?Strategy & goals

• Strategy is a planning process designed to achieve the firm’s goal(s)– Since this is a business strategy course, I will assume that the

firm’s goal is to maximize the firm’s sustainable profits– But similar tools apply to other goals (e.g., for non-profits, states,

individuals)

• That’s the goal of most business functions, not just strategy– Operations management– Research & development– Human resources

• What distinguishes strategy from other business functions?12 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 13: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

What is business strategy?What distinguishes strategy?

• Strategy addresses two questions:– Which markets should the firm participate in to advance its goals?

• I.e., which pies do you want to have slices in?– How can the firm create a sustainable competitive position in a

market in which it participates?• I.e., how can your firm get a bigger slice in those pies?

13 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 14: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

What is business strategy?Which markets?

• Abstract answer to the first question (which markets to participate in): markets with– A large or growing value pool (the total amount of value created

by the business activities)– In a benign strategic environment

• Strategic environment: the set of economic constraints that determines how much of the value of a business activity is captured by market participants (firm & rivals) rather than other actors (customers & suppliers)

Value pool The strategic environment

Substitution Entry Rivalry Supply chain

Total value created by biz activity (from raw materials to finished product delivered to consumers)

Allocates the value pool between markets

14 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 15: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

What is business strategy?How to gain a sustainable competitive position?• Abstract answer to 2nd question (sustainable competitive position):

creating/maintaining a position that’s valuable, unique & sustainable, because of a fit between strategic environment & firm’s strategic traits

The strategic environment(Identifying threats & opportunities)

Position(Valuable, unique & sustainable match

between environment & traits)

Strategic actions(Applying firm’s traits to improve the environment for firm)

Firm’s strategic traits(firm-specific competences & rigidities)

15 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 16: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

What is business strategy?Competitive position & SWOT analysis

• SWOT analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats)is a simple, all-purpose strategic tool

• Concept: match strategic environmentto firm’s strategic traits– Environment divided between

good (opportunities) & bad (threats)– Firm’s traits divided between

good (strengths) & bad (weaknesses)• But SWOT analysis is simplistic

– Makes a sharp good vs. bad distinction, when in reality many factors are somewhere in the middle

– More detailed tools are available to analyze both environment & firm• Environment: substitution, entry, rivalry, supply chain• Firm: strategic competences, strategic rigidities

16 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 17: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

What is business strategy?Summary: what distinguishes strategy?

• The table above summarizes the questions strategy addressesand the tools it uses to address those questions– We study the value pool in Section 1d– Strategic environment: Chapter 2– Strategic traits: Section 3a– Strategic actions: the rest of Chapter 3

17 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Firm’s goals (maximize sustainable profits)

Which markets should the firm participate in to advance its goals?

Value pool

Strategic environment (substitution, entry, rivalry, supply chain)

How can the firm create a sustainable competitive position in a market in which it participates?

Strategic environment (current & future)

Strategic traits (firm-specific competences & rigidities)

Strategic actions (differentiation, coordination, confrontation)

Page 18: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

FrameworkOverview of Chapter 1

a) Introduction to BSLb) What is business strategy?c) Business intelligenced) The value pool

© Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.18

Page 19: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Business intelligenceDeveloping a research plan

• A major element in the quality of your market analysis is your ability to acquire information for your analysis (the other major element is the analysis itself)– Doesn’t mean you should pick a market that has a lot of media exposure, or

that’s publicly listed – you can get all the info you need from observation, interviewing, and other research methods

• Process– Background reading of secondary sources (media, analyst reports, public SEC

filings, etc.) to get a “feel” for the industry– Create a report outline (based on the outline we will discuss in Section 3e),

fill in the info you have & note the info you lack– For each item of info you lack, determine what the ideal info would be, then

think of proxies from available sources that can substitute for the ideal info– Analyze the reliability of info you collected (including direction of bias)– Depending on reliability & importance of the info to your analysis, determine if

you need to collect more info on the issue

19 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 20: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Business intelligenceResearch methods

• Secondary research– Data that has already been collected by someone else: public filings that

firms make to the Securities & Exchange Commission or other regulators, analyst reports, books, newspaper articles and interviews, blogs & websites

– Advantage: somebody did the work for you– Disadvantages: info you need may not be available; info may not be reliable

• (Primary) quantitative research– Acquire numerical data & analyzing it using statistical/accounting techniques– Acquire the data from secondary sources, via survey, experiment, or quantify

data that is non-numerical (e.g., number of newspaper articles in which word X appears each year)

– Advantage: gives precise results– Disadvantages: requires statistical or accounting knowledge, need high

quality quantitative data, results depend on soundness of model’s assumptions

• (Primary) qualitative research– Methods that analyze data that you collect without quantifying it

20 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 21: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Business intelligenceResearch methods

• Qualitative research techniques– Observation (physical or online)– Interviewing (face-to-face, e-mail, phone, etc.)– Surveys (multiple choice, quantitative, or open-ended): allow getting input

from many people, but requires knowing exactly what you want to ask (no ability to follow up), and is time-consuming to process open-ended answers

– Focus groups (discussion among multiple participants, moderated by the researcher): useful for brainstorming creative ideas or to discuss products that the individuals have little experience with, and for products which are consumed collectively or in which the benefit is connected to interacting with others

21 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 22: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Business intelligenceTeam project: business intelligence

• In the first team project we will gather business intelligence about one issue that comes up early in a market analysis – identifying the bases of competition

• The first steps in your market analysis reports are:– Determining your starting point product

• You must begin by defining a specific product as your starting point, because different products (even similar ones) may be impacted differently by market forces

• If you are analyzing a merger/JV: each common product + synergy with not-common products

• If you are analyzing a firm: each of its products• If you are analyzing a market: most typical product in the market

– Finding the basis of competition• I.e., what makes the product good/better?

22 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 23: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Business intelligenceTeam project: business intelligence

• To find the bases of competition, start with customer needs that the product satisfies– Example: Product – J.D. degree; customer needs: getting a job @ big corporate

law firm; getting promoted in current job; making professional contacts; sense of accomplishment; intellectual challenge

• For each need, identify customer benchmarks – What do customers look at to see if product responds to their needs?– Example: Product – J.D. degree; Customer benchmarks: US news ranking;

perhaps % of grads who have such jobs (but do customers actually get this data?); geographical location

– Benchmark doesn’t have to correctly reflect need; just be perceived by potential customers as reflecting their needs

23 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 24: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Business intelligenceTeam project: business intelligence

• Working in a team, please research what are the bases of competition for a (U.S.) JD or LLM degree– Starting point product: Illinois JD or LLM degree– Figure out both customer needs & customer benchmarks– The methods you use to collect information are as important as

your conclusions• Write your findings in an e-mail to me

(1 e-mail per team)

24 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 25: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

FrameworkOverview of Chapter 1

a) Introduction to BSLb) What is business strategy?c) Business intelligenced) The value pool

© Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.25

Page 26: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value poolDefining value

• Value: benefit to the buyer of a product minus all costs of getting the product to the buyer– Value vs. profit: a seller’s share of the value it creates is its profit,

but not all value is usually captured by the seller– Value is shared between customers, sellers & firms in other

links of the supply chain– E.g., I value a gadget @$500; I buy it for $250; it costs $100 to

produce• Value: $400; seller’s profit: $150; buyer surplus: $250

– Note that value changes from buyer to buyer; profit is constant as long as costs & price remain the same

26 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 27: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value poolDefining the value pool

• Value pool: aggregate value that can be captured by market participants (firm, rivals or customers)– Firms’ share of the value pool is its profits– Customers’ share of the value pool is the consumer surplus

• Size of the value pool determined by:– Value margin (value – cost)– Volume of sales

• Expanding the value pool is important to a firm’s profitability, but is mostly outside this course’s scope– We will briefly discuss highlights; in the report, address only if

you very knowledgeable about the market

27 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 28: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value marginValue margin vs. profit margin

• Profit margin = (price – cost)/price– Example: Producing 3 widgets costs $5/widget in variable costs + $3 in

overhead costs. Widgets are sold for $8/each– Total costs = $18 ($6/widget)• Cost/widget would change if you produced more widgets

– Profit margin = (8-6)/8 = 2/8 = 25%• Value margin = (average value – cost)/average value– E.g., if widgets are valued at $11, $10 & $9, then average value is $10,

and value margin is: (10-6)/10 = 40%• Profit margin can be increased by increasing the value margin, but

it can also be increased by increasing the firm’s share of the existing value pool (i.e., by reducing competition)

28 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 29: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value marginIncreasing the value margin

• Adding value– Engineering: add features, improve product performance, etc.– Marketing: change customer perceptions of product’s value

• Cutting cost– Operations management: exploit economies of scale & scope, improve

efficiency of the production processes– Financial management: cashflow synergies, diversification, fin. engineering

• Value margin is also affected by spillover effects from other markets in supply chain; e.g.,

– Adding value: crude oil was originally refined into kerosene for lighting. Invention of the car added value (and volume) to crude oil, because it could be refined into gasoline

– Cutting cost: technological changes in mining that lower cost of iron ore can increase value margin for producing steel

29 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 30: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value marginCashflow synergies

• Fast-growing businesses require large investments– Firm must first invest/take losses and only later recoup profits, so

these businesses result in a negative cashflow– E.g., eBooks, smart phones, internet search engines– Why invest in a business with negative cashflow?

• Other markets have low growth prospects, but generate a stable stream of income– E.g., many cable operators, newspapers, utility companies

• Financial costs can be reduced by matching activity in cash-using markets & cash-generating markets– Why does this reduce financial costs? Can’t the firm borrow cash

or issue shares to raise cash rather than generate it?

30 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 31: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value marginCashflow synergies: BCG matrix

• The BCG (Growth-Share) matrix is one tooldesigned to manage market portfolios in way that evens out the cashflow– Uses market growth as

proxy for cash usage– Uses market share as proxy

for cash generation

31 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 32: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value marginCashflow synergies: cash cow

• Cash cow: Mature market generating significant positive cashflow– Fund the firm’s other activities– Why not have only cash cows?

32 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 33: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value marginCashflow synergies: star

• Star: Promising market, firm is well positioned in it; currently has negative cashflow– The future of the firm;

funded by firm’s cash cows(or by external financing)

33 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 34: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value marginCashflow synergies: question mark

• Question mark: Promising market, but firm ispoorly positioned; currently has negative cashflow– Firm must decide: Either -

• Invest heavily in order tocapture dominant position(turn into a star); or

• Get out of the market

34 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 35: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value marginCashflow synergies: dog

• Dog: Mature market & firm is poorly positioned; cashflow (positive or negative) is not significant– Get out of the market (sell or shut down)

35 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 36: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value marginCashflow: changes over time

• A product shifts positions over its lifecycle

Firminvests

Success

Failure

MarketMatures

Firm maintains lead

Firm loses lead

Firm loses leador market declines

36 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 37: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value marginDiversification

• Diversification attempts to reduce the volatility of profits (bad years less bad; good years less good)

• How is this different from cashflow considerations?– Cashflow: match markets that need cash with markets that

produce cash; use present profits to create future profits– Diversification: match markets that do well in certain

circumstances with markets that do well in opposite circumstances; use present profits to offset present losses

37 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 38: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value marginDiversification: some terminology

• The outcome of most investments is uncertain• To evaluate investments, we estimate probabilities of outcomes

– E.g., 50% likelihood of a 6% return; 50% likelihood of -4% return– If the estimate is correct, we no longer have uncertainty, but we still

have risk– What has risk but no uncertainty?

• Investments are evaluated on two dimensions:– Return: The average expected profit from the investment

• In the example above: 1%– Risk: The likely deviation from the average

• In the example above: ±5%

38 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 39: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value marginDiversification: understanding risk

• Consider 3 investments, all of which offer 10% return– A – U.S. Treasury Bond: 100% probability of a 10% return– B – Mature market

• 50%: earn a 0% return• 50%: earn a 20% return

– C – Emerging market• 50%: -100% return (lose entire investment)• 50%: 120% return

• Risk of each investment:– A: No deviation from average – Zero risk– B: ±10% deviation from average– C: ±110% deviation from average – 11 times the risk of B

39 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 40: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value marginDiversification: understanding risk

• Review:– Investment A• 50% chance: 1% return• 50% chance: 3% return

– Investment B• 50% chance: 3% return• 50% chance: 13% return

• Which is the riskier investment?• Then why do we want to avoid higher risk?

Average: 2%Deviation from Avg. ± 1%

Average: 8%Deviation from Avg. ± 5%

40 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 41: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value marginDiversification: how does it work?

• Diversification reduces risk without reducing the return– Reason: Regression to the mean– Imagine you are flipping a coin 10 times, counting how often it

falls on heads– Now imagine you are flipping the coin 1,000 times– What’s more likely:

• Coin fell on heads between 4 & 6 times out of 10• Coin fell on heads 400-600 times out of 1,000

41 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 42: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value marginDiversification: how does it work?

• Jane owns 10 shares of Acme. Having just heard that she needs to diversify, she buys another 990 Acme shares. Did she reduce her risk?

42 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 43: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value marginDiversification: correlation

• Additional “bets” diversify only to the extent that they are not correlated with the existing bets

– Correlation: The observation that when there’s a change in A, there’s a change in B

43 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 44: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value marginDiversification: full correlation

• Two Acme shares: whenever there’s a changein the price of one share, there’s an identical change in the other share – correlation between the shares is 1 (fully correlated)– Splitting your funds between these two investments

does not diversify at all• Acme share & Ajax share: Ajax owns 30% of

Acme’s shares, owns no other assets & has no other business – correlation is 1– Again, splitting funds between these two investments offers no

diversification

44 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 45: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value marginDiversification: some/no correlation

• Microsoft share & a lottery ticket: MS’s share price doesn’t affect chance of winning lottery or vice versa, so correlation is 0 (not correlated)– Splitting your funds between these two investments diversifies

• Bank of America share & Citibank share: Some factors affect both companies prices (e.g., interest rates); other factors are independent for each company. Correlation is, say, 0.6 (partially correlated)– Splitting your funds between these two investments diversifies

somewhat, but not as well as the previous example

45 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 46: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value marginDiversification: negative correlation

• Ford share & ExxonMobil share: Exxon rises &Ford drops when gas prices are high. Correlationis, say, -0.3 (negatively correlated)– Splitting your funds between these two investments is

called “hedging” (partial protection in case your bet is wrong)

• Buying a Ford share & Shorting a Ford share: Correlation is -1 (whenever one investment goes up, the other goes down by the same amount)– The two investments cancel out each other (if equal

amounts invested in each)

46 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 47: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value marginDiversification: theory to practice

• Firms diversify by operating in several markets that have a low correlation with each other: firm’s returns should be close to the projected (i.e., average) returns

• Firms hedge by operating (or buying financial instruments) in markets that have negative correlation with each other– This reduces profitability (gains in one market will be offset by losses in the

other) as the cost of reducing/eliminating the impact of a risk• Diversify, hedge, or neither?

– Hedge: risks with high uncertainty & high impact on the firm– Diversify: risks with lower uncertainty & high impact on the firm– Neither: risks with a low impact on the firm

• The agency problem with diversification– Diversification comes at expense of other goals (e.g., markets w/highest profit,

most synergies). Can someone else diversify instead of the firm?– Does management gain something from diversifying?

47 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 48: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value poolVolume of sales

• What affects volume of sales?– Factors unique to the particular product– Economic cycle’s effects on demand (income effects); e.g.,

• Demand for high-end products may decline during recessions• Demand for low-end products may increase as people trade down• Demand for some products is resistant to income effects (people buy the

same amount in good times & bad)– Don’t confuse income effects with price effects – tendency to buy more

when price is low & less when price is high– Spillover effects from other links in the supply chain– Product life cycle

48 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 49: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value poolSales volume & product life cycle

• Another predictable pattern in which demand changes over time relates to the natural life cycle of a product

– Often assessed on a market level (“industry life cycle”), but many markets have multiple products in different life cycle stages

Fragmentation Shakeout Maturity DeclineMarket:

Product:

49 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 50: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value poolProduct life cycle – Introduction

• Demand: small, uncertain• Competition: limited (few rivals; little substitution)– Firms emphasize innovation & product recognition

• Cashflow: high cash usage (“question mark”)– Invest in hope of growing volume

• Some life cycles add a “design” or “embryonic” stage before introduction (no sales & high investment in R&D)

50 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 51: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value poolProduct life cycle – Growth

• Demand: increases (from early adopters & wealthy to mass market)– Declining costs: economies of scale & experience curve– Declining marginal value as high-value customers are all tapped– Pressure on distribution system

• Competition: some features/biz models become dominant– Firms enter successful segments (increasing substitution & rivalry) & exit failed

segments– Firms emphasize distribution, differentiation

• Cashflow: very high cash usage (“star”)– Invest to increase sales

• Some life cycles divide growth into early(before one model dominates) & late phases

51 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 52: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value poolProduct life cycle – Maturity

• Demand: relatively flat– Little new demand, mostly replacement demand: direct (old customers

replacing new products with old ones) or indirect (new customers replacing old customers)

• Competition: price competition increases– Customers more price sensitive– Many rivals with sunk investments (emerging overcapacity)– Commoditization (less room to differentiate)– Firms emphasize cost efficiency (e.g., scale)

• Cashflow: high cash generation (“cash cow”)– Divert generated cash to stars/? (including

product extensions)

52 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.

Page 53: Business Strategy for Lawyers Chapter 1: Framework Prof. Amitai Aviram Aviram@illinois.edu University of Illinois College of Law Copyright © Amitai Aviram

Value poolProduct life cycle – Decline

• Demand: declining– Product obsolete; needs are better satisfied by other products/markets

• Competition: severe price competition until rivals die out– Reduced demand results in significant overcapacity– Firms emphasize cost efficiency, signaling commitment

• Cashflow: high but declining cash generation (“cash cow”)– Very little investment in R&D, production or distribution– Divert generated cash to stars / ? (including product extensions)

53 © Amitai Aviram. All rights reserved.