by order of the air force instruction 13-212,...
TRANSCRIPT
BY ORDER OF THE
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 13-212,
VOLUME 1
23 APRIL 2015
Nuclear, Space, Missile, Command and Control
Operations
RANGE PLANNING AND OPERATIONS
COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY
ACCESSIBILITY: Publications and forms are available on the e-Publishing web site at
www.e-Publishing.af.mil.
RELEASABILITY: There are no releasability restrictions on this publication.
OPR: AF/A3OJR
Supersedes: AFI 13-212, 16 November 2007
Certified by: AF/A3O
(Brig Gen Giovanni Tuck)
Pages: 129
This instruction and Air Force Instruction (AFI) 13-201, Airspace Management, implement Air
Force Policy Directive (AFPD) 13-2, Air Traffic, Airfield, Airspace, and Range Management.
This instruction also implements Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1322.27, DoD
Urban Training Facilities. It applies to all Regular Air Force, Air National Guard (ANG), and
Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC) Range Operating Authorities (ROA). It provides
guidance for the planning, operations, management, safety, equipment, facilities, and security of
Air Force (AF) ranges. Refer recommended changes and questions about this publication to the
Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) using the AF Form 847, Recommendation for Change of
Publication; route AF Forms 847 from the field through the appropriate functional chain of
command. See paragraph 1.6 for guidance on supplementing this instruction. The authorities to
waive wing/unit level requirements in this publication are identified with a Tier (“T-0, T-1, T-2,
T-3”) number following the compliance statement. See AFI 33-360, Publications and Forms
Management, Table 1.1, for a description of the authorities associated with the Tier numbers.
Submit requests for waivers through the chain of command to the appropriate Tier waiver
approval authority, or alternately, to the Publication OPR for non-tiered compliance items (see
paragraph 1.5 for additional information). Ensure that all records created as a result of processes
prescribed in this publication are maintained in accordance with (IAW) Air Force Manual
(AFMAN) 33-363, Management of Records, and disposed of IAW the Air Force Records
Disposition Schedule (RDS) in the Air Force Records Information Management System
(AFRIMS).
2 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
This document is substantially revised and must be completely reviewed. It implements
necessary changes to range planning and operations; includes mandated tiering IAW AFI 33-
360; mandates the use of the Center Scheduling Enterprise (CSE); provides updated range
planning guidance; identifies the range-supported events and assigned users; and better defines
Air Combat Command’s lead MAJCOM role for planning and programming.
Chapter 1—INTRODUCTION 5
1.1. Purpose. .................................................................................................................. 5
1.2. Scope. ..................................................................................................................... 5
1.3. Description of Ranges. ........................................................................................... 6
1.4. Range Test and Training Activities. ...................................................................... 6
1.5. Waivers. ................................................................................................................. 8
1.6. Supplements. .......................................................................................................... 9
Chapter 2—ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES 10
2.1. The Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations (AF/A3). .............................................. 10
2.2. The Director of Test and Evaluation (AF/TE). ...................................................... 11
2.3. The Director of Civil Engineers (AF/A4C). .......................................................... 12
2.4. The Deputy Under Secretary of the Air Force, International Affairs (SAF/IA). ... 12
2.5. The Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Installations, Environment, and
Energy (SAF/IE). ................................................................................................... 13
2.6. The Director, Global Power Programs (SAF/AQP). .............................................. 13
2.7. MAJCOM Commanders. ....................................................................................... 13
2.8. Range Operating Authority. ................................................................................... 15
2.9. Installation/Center Chief of Safety. ....................................................................... 19
2.10. Range Safety Personnel. ........................................................................................ 20
2.11. Installation Civil Engineer. .................................................................................... 20
Chapter 3—COMPREHENSIVE RANGE PLANNING 23
3.1. Comprehensive Range Planning. ........................................................................... 23
3.2. Planning Tools. ...................................................................................................... 33
Chapter 4—RANGE OPERATIONS AND SAFETY 34
4.1. Range Operations. .................................................................................................. 34
4.2. Written Agreements for AF-Operated Ranges. ...................................................... 34
4.3. Joint Use of Ranges. .............................................................................................. 35
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 3
4.4. Shared Use of Ranges. ........................................................................................... 35
4.5. Range Access. ........................................................................................................ 37
4.6. Radio Frequency Spectrum Issues. ........................................................................ 39
4.7. Communications Requirements. ............................................................................ 39
4.8. Armament Safety Procedures. ............................................................................... 40
4.9. Weapons Release Authority. .................................................................................. 40
4.10. Simulated Weapons Release Authority. ................................................................ 40
4.11. Weapons Employment and Airdrop Operations. ................................................... 40
4.12. Jettison Areas. ........................................................................................................ 43
4.13. Electronic Warfare Training Operations. ............................................................... 43
4.14. Flare and Chaff Employment. ................................................................................ 44
4.15. Global Positioning Satellite Electronic Attack. ..................................................... 44
4.16. Laser and Directed Energy Weapons Operations. ................................................. 45
4.17. Range Safety. ......................................................................................................... 47
4.18. Risk Management Program. ................................................................................... 49
4.19. Night Operations. ................................................................................................... 49
4.20. Supersonic Flight. .................................................................................................. 50
4.21. Training on Non-Federal Property. ........................................................................ 50
4.22. Range Operations Support. .................................................................................... 50
4.23. Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)/Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA). .................. 51
Chapter 5—TRACKING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 52
5.1. Reporting Requirements. ....................................................................................... 52
5.2. Expended Munitions Tracking. .............................................................................. 52
5.3. Range Clearance Report. ....................................................................................... 52
5.4. Defense Readiness Reporting System. .................................................................. 52
5.5. Threat Systems/Equipment Inventory. ................................................................... 52
Chapter 6—RANGE MAINTENANCE AND CLEARANCE OPERATIONS 53
6.1. Range Management Guidelines. ............................................................................ 53
6.2. Range Clearance Operations. ................................................................................. 54
6.3. Range Clearance Types and Requirements. ........................................................... 56
6.4. Range Maintenance and Clearance Safety. ............................................................ 57
6.5. Range Operations during Range Maintenance and Clearance. .............................. 58
4 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
Chapter 7—TEST AND TRAINING USE OF DEPLETED URANIUM 60
7.1. Policy and Procedures for Use of Depleted Uranium. ........................................... 60
7.2. Responsibilities. ..................................................................................................... 60
7.3. Authorized Locations. ............................................................................................ 60
7.4. Disposal/Decommission Procedures. ..................................................................... 61
Chapter 8—NATURAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT AND ENCROACHMENT
PREVENTION 63
8.1. Range Natural Infrastructure Management & Encroachment Prevention. ............ 63
8.2. Integrated Natural and Cultural Resources Program. ............................................ 64
8.3. Environmental Compliance, Conservation, and Pollution Prevention. .................. 64
8.4. Programming Guidance. ........................................................................................ 65
8.5. Environmental Inventory. ...................................................................................... 65
8.6. Operational Range Assessment Program. .............................................................. 65
Attachment 1—GLOSSARY OF REFERENCES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION 66
Attachment 2—US AIR FORCE OPERATED OR OWNED RANGES GOVERNED BY
THIS INSTRUCTION 86
Attachment 3—RANGE SUPPORTED MWS TRAINING EVENTS 89
Attachment 4—ASSIGNED RANGE USERS AND TRAINING EVENTS 107
Attachment 5—RANGE PERSONNEL TRAINING 126
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 5
Chapter 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1. Purpose. This instruction provides guidance for commanders to operate assigned ranges
safely, effectively, and efficiently to meet training and test requirements while minimizing
potential effects on the environment and the surrounding communities.
1.2. Scope.
1.2.1. This instruction applies to all United States Air Force (USAF) operated air and ground
ranges listed in Attachment 2. Guidance for the Space Test and Training Range and Cyber
ranges will be published in a separate volume. Space launch ranges and those dedicated to
small arms training addressed in AFI 36-2226, Combat Arms Program, are not covered by
this instruction. USAF-operated air and ground ranges outside of the United States (US) will
comply with this instruction, Department of Defense Directive (DoDD) 4715.12,
Environmental and Explosives Safety Management on Operational Ranges Outside the
United States, and/or host-nation rules, whichever is more restrictive.
1.2.2. Attachment 2 is intended to be the definitive list of ranges covered by this instruction.
AF organizations conducting range activities, as defined in Title 10 of United States Code
(10 U.S.C.) Section (§) 101(e)(2), at locations other than those listed in Attachment 2 must
contact the Publication OPR (through the parent MAJCOM) for a coverage review unless
one or more of the criteria listed in the following subparagraphs are met:
1.2.2.1. The activity is conducted at a AF operated range listed in Attachment 2.
1.2.2.2. The activity is specifically excluded in paragraph 1.2.1.
1.2.2.3. The activity is conducted at an operational range operated by another military
service, federal agency, or a host nation, IAW the rules and procedures established by the
organization operating the range. Note: while this AFI only applies to AF-operated
ranges, ranges operated by non-AF entities that are located on AF real property (e.g., test
sites located on an AF installation) should be required to comply with applicable portions
of this instruction via a host-tenant agreement to ensure safety and stewardship of AF
property.
1.2.2.4. The activity requires airspace only (no land or water surface component), and is
conducted IAW AF, Department of Defense (DoD), and Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) or host nation airspace regulations.
1.2.2.5. The activity consists of training involving drop zones and/or landing zones, and
is conducted IAW AFI 13-217, Drop Zone and Landing Zone Operations.
1.2.2.6. The activity consists of training conducted off federal real property. Refer to
DoDI 1322.28, Realistic Military Training (RMT) Off Federal Real Property, for
requirements and procedures for this type of activity.
1.2.3. If the coverage review determines the activity is within the scope and intent of this
instruction, the AFI will apply and Attachment 2 will be updated accordingly.
6 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
1.3. Description of Ranges. A range is an area established for range activities as set forth in 10
U.S.C. § 101(e)(2). These activities include training, research and development, and test and
evaluation of military systems, personnel, tactics, munitions, and explosives. Air and ground
ranges are typically described in terms of the range capabilities and the activities conducted
within a specific geographic area.
1.3.1. Primary Training Range (PTR). PTRs are established to accommodate training. They
are not designed or structured to accommodate test and evaluation activities.
1.3.2. Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB). DoDD 3200.11, Major Range and
Test Facility Base (MRTFB); AFI 99-109, Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB)
Test and Evaluation Resource Planning; and this instruction govern specific DoD Test and
Evaluation (T&E) activities. Although the MRTFB functions primarily in support of DoD
test and evaluation missions, they also support training and other range activities. The
MRTFB is financed through a combination of appropriated (institutional) funds and user
charges IAW DoD 7000.14-R, DoD Financial Management Regulation.
1.3.3. Test Sites. These sites are developed and used for specific Developmental Test and
Evaluation (DT&E) and Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E) requirements. They are
considered ranges under this instruction due to the scope, nature and frequency of conducting
many of the defined range activities.
1.4. Range Test and Training Activities. The land or sea encompassed within the Hazard
Area or underlying an air-to-air range used for actual weapon employment must be protected by
purchase, lease, or other means to ensure the safety of personnel, structures, and the public from
expended weapons, laser and electromagnetic emissions, and target debris.
1.4.1. Surface-to-Surface. Surface-to-Surface test and training cover a wide range of
mission requirements, including survivability test, horizontal and vertical live-fire events,
surface and subsurface tests in international waters, Research and Development (R&D),
Directed Energy Weapons (DEW), explosives operations, heavy weapons qualification, and
Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) thermal treatment and disposal. Ranges that support
Special Operations Forces (SOF) and other ground test and training requirements may
require substantial ground infrastructure, including shoot houses, urban villages, laser
scoring, in-band imaging, complex communication and instrumentation, range surveillance
radars and other facilities.
1.4.2. Air-to-Surface. Air-to-Surface test and training may require a substantial amount of
range space and a sophisticated infrastructure to support complex, multi-aircraft operations;
air-to-surface munition, cruise missile, and DEW employment; aeronautical system testing;
unmanned vehicles; airdrop; and battlefield operations. This infrastructure may include high
and/or low fidelity threat simulators, visual threat simulators, scoring capabilities, realistic
target arrays, command and control systems, communication networks, data
display/processing capabilities, instrumentation/debrief systems, flight termination systems,
and flight hazard analysis/strike prediction capability.
1.4.3. Electronic Warfare. Locations supporting Electronic Warfare (EW) training must be
capable of providing a simulated electronic threat environment for aircrew combat training.
Electronic Warfare Ranges (EWRs) are located on a range (usually a range capable of
receiving surface fires and actual ordnance delivery). Electronic Warfare Sites (EWSs)
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 7
typically provide EW simulation and feedback, but are not located on a range. An EWS can
be established at any location with proper security. Typically, they are located under or near
a Military Training Route (MTR) or Military Operations Area (MOA).
1.4.4. Surface-to-Air. Surface-to-Air test and training cover a wide range of mission
requirements. Ranges that support, for example, endo-atmospheric and exo-atmospheric
missile intercepts, aeronautical system testing, and ballistic missiles require a substantial
amount of range space and a sophisticated range infrastructure. This infrastructure may
include high fidelity simulators, visual simulators, end-game scoring capabilities, command
and control systems, communications networks, data display/processing capabilities,
instrumentation systems, flight termination systems, and flight hazard analysis/strike
prediction capability.
1.4.5. Air-to-Air. Air-to-Air test and training cover a wide range of mission requirements,
such as air-to-air operations involving simulated and actual employment of missiles, air-to-
air gunnery, aeronautical system testing, unmanned vehicles, and EW, which require a
substantial amount of range space and a sophisticated range infrastructure. This
infrastructure may include high fidelity simulators, visual simulators, end-game scoring
capabilities, command and control systems, communication networks, data
display/processing capabilities, instrumentation systems, flight termination systems, and
flight hazard analysis/strike prediction capability. Note: live air-to-air gunnery training uses
towed targets and drones, so the aircraft performance capabilities and the appropriate
munitions ballistics tables must be used to determine the airspace and surface area required
for safe operations.
1.4.6. Air Combat Training System (ACTS). Training utilizing ACTS supplements the other
listed range activities by instrumenting aircraft, airspaces, and ranges to support real-time
observation and assessment of the training as well as post-mission playback for debriefing.
1.4.6.1. Tethered flight instrumentation range systems provide Time-Space-Position-
Information (TSPI) and model weapons impact or flyout for aircrew kill notification
using ground-based computers, towers, and communications relays and aircraft pods or
internal avionics. These systems also provide real-time live monitor capability for Range
Training Officer oversight of the training.
1.4.6.2. Rangeless/untethered flight instrumentation range systems use autonomous pods,
aircraft avionics or recording devices of participating aircraft to provide capabilities
similar to a tethered system. Pod-to-Pod or aircraft data links can relay kill predictions to
participating aircraft for near-real time kill notification. Rangeless/untethered systems do
not provide a real-time live monitor data feed to a Range Training Officer.
1.4.7. Live, Virtual, and Constructive (LVC) Augmentation. Live airspace and range
operations may be augmented with virtual mission simulators and/or computer-generated
constructive models and simulations to tailor or enhance range capabilities to meet specific
test and training objectives.
1.4.8. USAF Range Service Levels. Ranges provide different levels of service dependent
upon several factors, such as hours of manned operation, scheduled test and training
activities, utilization, etc. For example, a Range under the MRTFB may provide both Class
8 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
A and Class T service on different parts of the range or at different times; a PTR may provide
Class A service during daylight hours but Class C service during nighttime hours.
1.4.8.1. Class A service. Class A service provides a manned, ground-scoring and/or EW
capable range with a Range Control Officer (RCO) present on range and controlling
surface activities and operations.
1.4.8.2. Class B service. Class B service provides a manned or unmanned, ground-
scoring and/or EW capable range where no RCO is present on range for controlling
surface activities and operations. Note: Class B service includes ranges where a
remotely-sited range operations center monitors air and ground operations and provides
scoring feedback.
1.4.8.3. Class C service. Class C service provides an unmanned range with no scoring,
no EW services and no RCO control of ground activities or operations.
1.4.8.4. Class D service. Class D service provides an instrumented range supporting
operations monitored by a Range Training Officer (RTO).
1.4.8.5. Class T service. Class T service provides a manned or unmanned range or test
site intended for test activities and explosives/weapons detonations, controlled by the
ROA. For weapons systems development and test missions, the ROA will ensure the
applicable RCO functions are performed by a RCO, range controller or assigned test
supervisor, competent in range operating procedures and the test activities related to the
specific missions and profiles.
1.5. Waivers. Waivers to this instruction are authorized and shall be processed IAW AFI 33-
360, Publication and Forms Management. Waiver authority for this instruction is delegated to
AF/A3OJR for compliance items above the unit level. For unit-level compliance items, waivers
may be approved by the appropriate Tier waiver approval authority. At the unit level, the ROA
should monitor implementation of this instruction and review authorized waivers anytime the
circumstances that prompted the waiver or the impacts of the excepted activity change
substantially.
1.5.1. Waiver requests. The waiver request must include the information specified in
paragraph 1.9.5.2 of AFI 33-360, Publication and Forms Management. Additional content is
at the discretion of the waiver authority. For waiver requests needing publication
OPR/Approver concurrence or approval (AF/A3OJR or higher), the waiver request must also
include the following:
1.5.1.1. Range name, location, ROA and a point-of-contact.
1.5.1.2. Reference and text of the specific requirement for which the commander/director
is requesting a waiver.
1.5.1.3. Description of the conditions at issue to include:
1.5.1.3.1. Potential alternatives and their impact on test and training operations,
maintenance, cost, and other factors deemed appropriate by the requesting agency.
1.5.1.3.2. Proposed actions and procedures to mitigate safety or other issues of
concern.
1.5.1.3.3. Risk Management (RM) Analysis. See paragraph 4.18.
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 9
1.5.1.3.4. Supporting maps, charts, graphics, or other illustrations as appropriate.
1.5.1.4. For waiver requests, include a detailed plan to alleviate the condition.
1.5.1.5. Previously granted exemption or waiver.
1.5.2. Tier 0 and Tier 1 Waiver Coordination and Approval. ROAs will submit requests to
the appropriate MAJCOM. The MAJCOM must submit the waiver request to AF/A3OJR.
AF/A3OJR will coordinate with AF/A4CXR for EOD, Unexploded Ordnance (UXO), and
range clearance matters and with AF/TE for test and evaluation ranges when appropriate.
1.6. Supplements. This publication may be supplemented at any level. All supplements must
be routed as indicated below for coordination prior to certification and approval. Supplements
may change, or add procedures, as applicable, to this instruction, but must ensure changes are no
less restrictive than the basic instruction. All supplements must be published IAW AFI 33-360
Publication and Forms Management, on the Air Force electronics publications (e-pubs) website.
1.6.1. For MAJCOM supplements, MAJCOMs must submit a copy to AF/A3OJR for review
and coordination prior to publication.
1.6.2. For Wing or unit supplements, units will submit a copy to the MAJCOM for review
and coordination prior to publication.
10 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
Chapter 2
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
2.1. The Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations (AF/A3). IAW Headquarters Air Force
Mission Directive 1-54, AF/A3 is responsible for matters concerning airspace and ranges.
AF/A3, through the Director of Operations and Readiness (AF/A3O), establishes airspace and
range policy, programming, and requirements.
2.1.1. AF/A3O.
2.1.1.1. Serves as the Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) and co-chair for the Air
Force Test and Training Infrastructure Council (AFTTIC).
2.1.1.2. Designates the Ranges, Airspace, and Operations Sustainment Office
(AF/A3OJR) as the focal point for AF airspace and range policy and management.
2.1.1.2.1. AF/A3OJR.
2.1.1.2.1.1. Develops airspace and range policy, programming, and requirements
IAW AFPD 13-2, AFI 13-201, and this instruction.
2.1.1.2.1.2. Integrates encroachment management into operational range policies,
and executes other encroachment-related responsibilities as defined in AFI 90-
2001, Encroachment Management.
2.1.1.2.1.3. Serves as OPR for comprehensive range planning by publishing an
Air Force Ranges Strategic Plan, reviews/approves the Enterprise Range Plan
(ERP), and reviews/approves Comprehensive Range Plans for newly-established
ranges.
2.1.1.2.1.4. Serves as focal point for Headquarters Air Force review and
coordination of Test & Training Space Needs Statements (T/TSNS) for ranges
and airspace.
2.1.1.2.1.5. Advocates for AF training range development, procurement, and
sustainment funding in coordination with SAF/AQP Program Element Monitor.
2.1.1.2.1.6. Sponsors AF Program Element Monitor (PEM) for Readiness
Training Ranges, Operations and Maintenance (O&M) (Program Element (PE)
27604F).
2.1.1.2.1.7. Sponsors AF PEM for Nevada/Utah Test and Training Ranges (PE
27428F).
2.1.1.2.1.8. Participates early in the scoping and review of all Environmental
Impact Analysis Process (EIAP) issues and documents concerning USAF-
operated ranges, IAW 32 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 989,
Environmental Impact Analysis Process.
2.1.1.2.1.9. Coordinates with the DoD Urban Training Facilities Review Group
(UTFRG) to ensure AF Urban Training Facility proposals are properly evaluated
and/or certified IAW DoDI 1322.27.
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 11
2.1.1.2.1.10. Coordinates Congressional inquiries concerning Air Force ranges,
including operational and environmental issues.
2.1.1.2.1.11. Interfaces with the FAA on airspace/range policy matters through
the FAA Headquarters and Regional representatives.
2.1.1.2.1.12. Maintains/updates USAF sections of FAA Handbooks concerning
USAF-operated ranges as requested.
2.1.1.2.1.13. Coordinates with other public, private, and tribal interests and
agencies as required in support of AF airspace and range requirements.
2.1.1.2.1.14. Coordinates and makes determinations on all exemptions, waivers,
and changes to this instruction.
2.2. The Director of Test and Evaluation (AF/TE).
2.2.1. Establishes Air Force test and evaluation policy.
2.2.2. Determines adequacy of test and evaluation resources to support weapon system
development.
2.2.3. Resolves developmental and operational test programmatic issues.
2.2.4. Serves as co-chair for the Air Force Test and Training Infrastructure Council
(AFTTIC).
2.2.5. Advises the Chief of Staff of the Air Force and the Secretary of the Air Force of test
and evaluation issues relating to program execution.
2.2.6. Provides final review, authorization and signature for Test and Evaluation Master
Plans (TEMPs) prior to Service Acquisition Executive (SAE) approval and signature, as
outlined in AFI 99-103, Capabilities-Based Test and Evaluation.
2.2.7. Represents test and evaluation interests to the Air Force Requirements Oversight
Council (AFROC).
2.2.8. Test Policy and Programs Division (AF/TEP).
2.2.8.1. Promulgates Air Force test and evaluation policy as the Air Staff OPR for:
AFPD 99-1, Test and Evaluation; AFI 99-103, AFI 99-106, Joint Test and Evaluation
Program; AFI 99-108, Programming and Reporting Aerial Target and Missile
Expenditures in Test and Evaluation; and AFI 99-120, Forecasting and Programming
Munitions Telemetry and Flight Termination Systems.
2.2.8.2. Reviews Initial Capabilities Documents (ICD), Capability Development
Documents (CDD), Capability Production Documents (CPD), and TEMPs for proper test
and evaluation support and responsibilities (see AFI 99-103).
2.2.8.3. Serves as Air Force OPR for the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD)
sponsored Joint Test and Evaluation (JT&E) Program.
2.2.8.4. Oversees the Air Force test infrastructure to ensure adequate facilities are
available to support Air Force test and evaluation activities.
2.2.8.5. Formulates the acquisition strategy and overall program plan for test and
evaluation resources in conjunction with developing and using commands.
12 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
2.2.8.6. Oversees the Test Investment Planning and Programming (TIPP) process and
Air Force Test and Evaluation Modernization Planning Process.
2.2.8.7. Performs all PEM responsibilities for the following test and evaluation
infrastructure and support areas: Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center
O&M; Combat Development; Threat Simulator Development; Major Test and Evaluation
Investment; Initial Operational Test and Evaluation; Test and Evaluation Support;
Facility Sustainment – Test and Evaluation Support; and Facility Restoration and
Modernization – Test and Evaluation Support.
2.2.8.8. Promulgates AF T&E resources policy and serves as OPR for AFI 99-109.
2.2.8.9. Answers Congressional inquiries regarding test and evaluation matters.
2.3. The Director of Civil Engineers (AF/A4C).
2.3.1. Supports the Ranges and Airspace Division’s role as the focal point for USAF ranges
in the development of policy, advocating for resources, and managing the oversight of Air
Force Ranges.
2.3.2. Performs all PEM responsibilities for the following range support areas: Military
Construction; Range Facility Sustainment, Restoration, Modernization; Facilities Operation
for Range Utilities; and operational range environmental support such as operational range
assessments and responses, and natural and cultural program execution.
2.3.3. Serves as OPR for the Operational Range Assessment Program.
2.3.4. Provides environmental policy consultation and support for OSD meetings requiring
Air Force environmental representation.
2.3.5. Oversees implementation of policy and execution for applicable EIAP issues and
documents concerning USAF-operated ranges IAW 32 CFR Part 989. Note: As stated in 32
CFR 989.3(b), the National Guard Bureau Air Directorate (NGB-CF) performs this function
for Air National Guard actions.
2.3.6. Serves as OPR for all matters related to EOD, UXO, and range clearance procedures.
2.3.7. Provides environmental consultation for compliance with the Military Munitions Rule
under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
2.3.8. Implements environmental policy to ensure compliance with DoD policy and
regulatory requirements such as operational range assessments and responses and applicable
environmental requirements.
2.4. The Deputy Under Secretary of the Air Force, International Affairs (SAF/IA).
2.4.1. Promotes international relationships as part of the US commitment to global peace and
security.
2.4.2. Oversees security assistance programs as a means of pursuing US national security
goals and objectives. Plans, develops, implements, and administers the US Air Force
portions of these programs.
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 13
2.4.3. Manages (in conjunction with Air Force Security Assistance and Cooperation
Directorate) Foreign Military Sales cases, and other security assistance cases, involving
major systems or requiring special management consideration.
2.4.4. Serves as the focal point for negotiations with foreign nations on issues related to the
use of USAF-owned or operated ranges.
2.5. The Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Installations, Environment, and Energy
(SAF/IE).
2.5.1. Provides policy and oversight of all EIAP issues and documents concerning USAF-
operated ranges IAW 32 CFR Part 989.
2.5.2. Provides oversight of all operational range environmental support such as operational
range assessments and responses, natural and cultural resource management program,
hazardous material and hazardous waste management, and compliance with applicable
environmental requirements.
2.5.3. Represents the Air Force in meetings with OSD and environmental regulatory
agencies involving discussion of Air Force range environmental compliance activities and
environmental policy.
2.5.4. Oversees the acquisition, creation, modification, transfer, or withdrawal of range land
IAW AFI 32-9001, Acquisition of Real Property, the Federal Land Policy and Management
Act (FLPMA) and Title 43, United States Code, Sections 155-158.
2.5.5. Serves as OPR for the Air Force Encroachment Management Program.
2.5.6. Executes encroachment management responsibilities as defined in AFPD 90-20,
Encroachment Management Program, and AFI 90-2001, Encroachment Management.
2.6. The Director, Global Power Programs (SAF/AQP).
2.6.1. Acts as the focal point for development and procurement of subscale and full-scale
aerial target systems and Combat Training Range systems, aircraft tracking equipment, threat
simulators and engagement scoring systems.
2.6.2. Performs all PEM responsibilities for Aerial Targets and Combat Training Range
development, procurement, and sustainment (PE 64735, 27429, and 35116).
2.6.3. Coordinates acquisition programs and PE changes with AF/A3OJR.
2.6.4. Responds to Congressional inquiries regarding assigned PEs.
2.7. MAJCOM Commanders. All references to MAJCOMs in this instruction include the Air
National Guard (ANG) and Commander, Air Force Forces (COMAFFOR) in Combatant
Commands. MAJCOM Commanders, through appropriate level staff, will:
2.7.1. Conduct comprehensive range planning.
2.7.2. (ACC) Develop and publish the ERP.
2.7.3. Review and approve all subordinate unit Comprehensive Range Plans (CRP), and
ensure the CRPs support the AF Ranges Strategic Plan and the ERP.
2.7.4. Review and forward requests for exemptions and waivers to this instruction to
AF/A3OJR.
14 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
2.7.5. Review Urban Training Facility proposals from subordinate ranges, and submit these
proposals to AF/A3OJR for coordination with the UTFRG.
2.7.6. Develop policy, advocate for resources, define requirements, and manage the
oversight of MAJCOM ranges.
2.7.7. Acquire contract services IAW AFI 63-138, Acquisition of Services, and AFI 63-
101/20-101, Integrated Life Cycle Management. When practical, partner with other
MAJCOMs to achieve economies of scale.
2.7.8. Review and coordinate all range-related documents to include relevant Integrated
Natural Resource Management Plans (INRMPs), Integrated Cultural Resources Management
Plans (ICRMPs) and subordinate plans to ensure compatibility with CRP and other range
plans.
2.7.9. Ensure range scheduling and utilization data is recorded and archived in the Center
Scheduling Enterprise (CSE).
2.7.10. (ACC) Serve as the lead-MAJCOM for CSE.
2.7.11. (ACC) Serve as the lead-MAJCOM for Weapon Danger Zones (WDZs)
2.7.12. Ensure subordinate ranges use the most current training Surface Danger Zones
(SDZs)/WDZs concurrent with the introduction of new aircraft, weapons, and tactics or
training requirements.
2.7.13. Establish procedures and training requirements for EW operations personnel
performing duties associated with paragraph 4.13.
2.7.14. Support efforts of subordinate ranges to conserve and restore the natural and man-
made infrastructure at their ranges.
2.7.15. Coordinate with other public and private interests and agencies as required to support
MAJCOM range requirements.
2.7.16. (AFMC) Through the 711th Human Performance Wing, maintains the institutional
capability to conduct range certifications for lasers and Directed Energy Weapons. Costs
associated with conducting these certifications are funded by the requesting MAJCOM.
2.7.17. (ACC, PACAF, AETC, AFSOC, USAFE) Provide O&M inputs for Readiness
Training Ranges (PE 27604F). ACC will serve as lead MAJCOM for representing PE
27604F to the Air Superiority Core Function Team, who is responsible for representing
programmatic details within PE 27604F as part of the corporate process.
2.7.18. (ACC) Sponsor PEM for Nevada/Utah Test and Training Ranges (PE 27428F).
ACC will serve as lead MAJCOM for representing PE 27428F to the Air Superiority Core
Function Team, who is responsible for representing programmatic details within PE 27428F
as part of the corporate process.
2.7.19. (ACC, PACAF, AETC, AFSOC, USAFE, ANG, AFRC, AFGSC, AMC) Provide
inputs for training range investment and equipment (PE 27429F/64735F). ACC will serve as
lead MAJCOM for representing PE 27429F/64735F to the Air Superiority Core Function
Team, who is responsible for representing programmatic details within these two PE’s as part
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 15
of the corporate process. ACC will develop and publish a process for soliciting MAJCOM
inputs.
2.7.20. (ANG) Sponsor PEM for ANG Ranges, O&M, and personnel (PE 52634F). ANG
will represent PE 52634F to the Air Superiority Core Function Team, who is responsible for
representing programmatic details within PE 52634F as part of the corporate process.
2.7.21. (AFMC) Sponsor PEM for AFMC Ranges, Operations and Sustainment, and
personnel (PE 65807F) IAW the AF and MAJCOM Corporate process.
2.7.22. (AFMC) Sponsor PEM for the T&E investment PEs as outlined in AFI 99-109.
2.7.23. (ACC) Host a biennial Air Force Airspace and Range Conference.
2.8. Range Operating Authority. The wing commander is responsible for operating the range
and may delegate ROA responsibilities, in writing, to a unit commander or designated
representative. For ANG-operated ranges and the Nevada Test & Training Range (NTTR), the
range commander is designated as the ROA.
2.8.1. Appoints a Range Operations Officer (ROO), in writing, to supervise range
operations, management, planning, and maintenance. (T1). The ROO will be a military
officer or DoD civilian employee. (T1). Note: MAJCOM waivers must be reviewed by the
Staff Judge Advocate and Manpower offices for compliance with applicable law and DoDI
1100.22, Policy and Procedures for Determining Workforce Mix.
2.8.1.1. The ROA designates the responsibilities of the ROO. Normally the ROO has
authority over all ground operations and serves as the ROA’s primary point of contact for
operational range issues.
2.8.1.2. The ROO develops range procedures, interfaces with support agencies and
flying units related to range operations, maintenance, planning, and compliance.
2.8.2. Appoints a Range Safety Officer (RSO). (T1). The RSO will be a military officer or
civilian employee. (T1). Note: MAJCOM waivers must be reviewed by the Staff Judge
Advocate and Manpower offices for compliance with applicable law and DoDI 1100.22.
2.8.3. Appoints or obtains the support of a military officer or civilian as a Flight Safety
Officer (FSO) IAW AFI 91-202, The US Air Force Mishap Prevention Program, if the range
accommodates flight test or training. (Tiering IAW cited publication).
2.8.4. Appoints a Laser Safety Officer (LSO) IAW AFI 48-139, Laser and Optical Radiation
Protection Program, if the range accommodates laser operations. (Tiering IAW cited
publication).
2.8.5. Appoints a Directed Energy Weapon Safety Officer (DEWSO) IAW AFI 91-401,
Directed Energy Weapons Safety, or obtain DEWSO support from a parent or associated unit
if the range accommodates DEW operations. (T1).
2.8.6. Certifies RCOs and Test Area Control Officers (TACOs) in writing. (T2). The ROA
will establish the education, training, experience, and affiliation (contract or government)
requirements for these positions, based on the AFI intent and best and most effective
practices. (T1).
16 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
2.8.6.1. For ranges supporting training requirements involving any aircraft, the RCO
will, at a minimum, have rated aircrew, Air Traffic Control (ATC), Air Battle Manager
(ABM), Joint Terminal Attack Controller (JTAC), Enlisted Terminal Attack Controller
(ETAC), Weapons Director (WD), previous RCO or equivalent test experience. (T1).
2.8.6.2. For test sites, the ROA will identify actions, requirements, and responsibilities of
the designated RCOs and TACOs. (T1).
2.8.6.3. For Aerial Gunnery, RCO qualification requirements, duties and responsibilities
of the RCO will be IAW AFI 11-214, Air Operations Rules and Procedures. (Tiering
IAW cited publication).
2.8.7. Ensures test activities are thoroughly reviewed and documented within the AFI 99-103
safety review process. (T1).
2.8.8. Certifies RTOs in writing. (T2). For air-to-air training on ranges and other airspace
providing Class D service, the primary RTO responsibilities in addition to flight safety are to
facilitate training, provide real-time kill removal, and assist flight leads in mission
reconstruction during debriefs. During autonomous air-to-air training (conducted without
Ground-Control Interception (GCI) or Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS)),
the RTO may assist aircrews in maintaining aircraft inside airspace boundaries and expedite
rejoins upon request. The RTO may be military or contractor furnished, but as a minimum,
RTOs must possess "rated mission expertise" in the activity being performed or have Air
Battle Manager/Weapons Director experience.
2.8.9. Appoints a data steward to create, maintain, and manage the range functional
geospatial data and/or mission datasets (T3). The range data steward coordinates with the
Installation Geospatial Integration Office (GIO) on all mapping and geospatial integration
requirements IAW paragraph 3.2.2 and AFI 32-10112, Installation Geospatial Information
and Services (Installation GI&S) Program.
2.8.10. Ensures all personnel appointed or assigned to the range are qualified and trained for
their positions IAW Attachment 5, Range Personnel Training; and MAJCOM supplements
before assuming duties. (T1). All training must be documented. The method of
documentation is up to the supervisor, if not otherwise prescribed by the applicable
MAJCOM or related chain of authority.
2.8.11. Ensures range personnel training is documented and records are reviewed annually.
(T2).
2.8.12. Ensures compliance with this instruction and other directives applicable to range
programs. (T1). ROAs may delegate the daily scheduling, operation, maintenance, and
management of the range to a subordinate unit.
2.8.13. Enters into written agreements in coordination with the MAJCOM and IAW AFI 25-
201, Intra-Service, Intra-Agency, and Inter-Agency Support Agreements Procedures. (T1).
2.8.14. Develops and maintains a range supplement to this instruction, which will be
approved and published at wing level. (T1). Exception: supplements for ANG ranges and
NTTR may be approved and published by the ROA.
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 17
2.8.14.1. Ranges may use the most suitable format for the supplement (i.e., integrated or
standalone) within the constraints established in AFI 33-360, Publications and Forms
Management.
2.8.14.2. The range supplement must be submitted to the parent MAJCOM range office
for review and coordination prior to publication.
2.8.14.3. Range Supplement Content. The range supplement must include, but is not
limited to: general range description; services available; hours of operation; range
diagrams; range scheduling procedures; operations; joint operating procedures; laser and
attack restrictions, target and weapons authorizations and restrictions (to include
composition of target and authorized ordnance); EW operating procedures; safety;
emergency and jettison procedures; authorized frequency clearances; RCO procedures;
chaff and flare operations; night lighting diagrams; night operations; RCO Night Vision
Device (NVD) operations; ground laser procedures; support agency procedures and
agreements; range clearance operations; pyrotechnic employment procedures and
restrictions; and fire suppression responsibilities.
2.8.15. Prepares a CRP (as outlined in paragraph 3.1.11) for MAJCOM approval. (T1). New
ranges will not open for operations until the CRP has been reviewed by MAJCOM and
approved by AF/A3OJR (and AF/TE for test and evaluation ranges). (T1).
2.8.16. Ensures proposals to construct or upgrade Urban Training Facilities are properly
evaluated and/or certified IAW DoDI 1322.27 and this instruction. (T0).
2.8.17. Maintains scheduling control over all range space and equipment using CSE and
document scheduling procedures in a Letter of Agreement (LOA) or the range supplement.
(T1). Exception: for Class-T ranges that do not manage or use airspace, the parent
MAJCOM will determine whether use of CSE is required.
2.8.18. Utilizes CSE as the initial entry point for users to obtain information on the range
and points-of-contact for questions. Post on CSE applicable range information, points-of-
contact, updated procedures, access to the local supplement to this instruction, scheduling
information, and links to other large reference sources, such as target and range imagery,
stored outside of CSE. (T1).
2.8.19. Maintains a record of clearance activities that accurately captures the geographic
scope of the clearance activity. (T1). Copies of EOD range clearance reports will suffice
provided the reports include this required information.
2.8.20. Develops and implements training, inspection, and maintenance procedures for range
NVDs utilized by RCOs and other range personnel. (T2).
2.8.21. Establishes procedures for range, ground and explosive safety. Safety of Landing
Zones (LZ) and Drop Zones (DZ) will be in accordance with AFI 13-217. (T1).
2.8.22. Implements a RM process for the range IAW AFI 90-802, Risk Management. (T1).
2.8.22.1. Coordinates RM assessments through the parent MAJCOM and AF/A3OJR
prior to any change to range boundaries. (T1).
18 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
2.8.22.2. For changes to range operations or procedures where the risk increases to high
(or above), notifies the parent MAJCOM Range and Safety staffs prior to implementation
IAW AFI 91-202. (Tiering IAW cited publication).
2.8.22.3. For planned or implemented changes, performs and maintains records of a
WDZ analysis for all targets, manned facilities/sites, and equipment on the range. (T1).
2.8.23. Publishes public notices concerning Hazard Areas associated with ranges under the
ROA’s control. (T1).
2.8.24. Ensures range boundary signs are posted IAW paragraph 4.5.1. (T1). On ranges that
fall within the boundaries and direct control of another agency responsible for the safety and
security of the range, such as a shared-use Army range, the ROA shall coordinate with the
owning agency to determine appropriate signage consistent with the intent of paragraph
4.5.1. (T1).
2.8.25. Establishes an outreach program to educate installation personnel and the public
about the dangers of trespassing and UXO hazards. (T1). Using appropriate forums, address
range issues that have the potential to influence the surrounding community. (T3).
2.8.26. Establishes procedures for basic first aid and medical evacuation of any personnel
injured during range operations. (T1). Note: for EOD range clearance activities, refer to the
medical support requirements published in AFMAN 91-201, Explosive Safety Standards, and
AFI 32-3001, Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Program.
2.8.27. Establishes range security procedures to include physical safeguards for all range
equipment and facilities. (T1).
2.8.28. Controls access to hazardous areas, as described in Chapter 4: Range Operations and
Safety, using physical safeguards or procedures to protect all personnel and property. (T1).
2.8.29. Conducts a risk assessment to establish published procedures and restrictions for the
expenditure of all munitions (weapons, flares, threat simulators, etc.). (T1). Review the risk
assessment annually. (T2).
2.8.30. Ensures no target or target material is placed on a range until all hazardous material,
including potential hazardous waste regulated by the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 6901-6992, has been removed from the target or target material, except to
the extent that the presence of such hazardous material is essential to the operation or
effectiveness of the target or target material. (T0).
2.8.31. Implements a preventive and corrective maintenance program to renovate, remove,
and overhaul range targets, systems and debris. (T1).
2.8.32. Describes all range clearance and debris removal activities in the CRP. (T1).
2.8.32.1. Although the Civil Engineer manages the EOD program and provides
personnel for the range clearance mission, the ROA funds all aspects of range clearance
support.
2.8.32.2. Whenever possible, design, locate, and maintain targets to minimize future
debris clearance costs to include use of innovative range clearance technologies and best
management practices (target material substitution, recycling, etc.).
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 19
2.8.33. Leads efforts to sustain, restore, and modernize the natural and man-made
infrastructure at their range. (T3). This includes identifying the range natural infrastructure
requirements and regularly evaluating the health of the natural infrastructure.
2.8.34. Reviews, coordinates or approves all plans, proposals, and documents potentially
affecting range operations to ensure compatibility. (T1).
2.8.34.1. Within ninety (90) days of taking over such duties and at least annually
thereafter, the ROA will coordinate with the servicing installation civil engineer (CE)
environmental planning function and ensure that range operations are in compliance with
applicable environmental requirements and within the scope of all relevant environmental
analyses, including any required management actions or mitigations. (T1).
2.8.34.2. As required, identify and resolve (to include renegotiation of existing
agreements if necessary) any management actions or mitigations that are having or could
have a significant adverse impact on military mission operations.
2.8.34.3. Any Enhanced Use Lease (EUL) on Air Force range property must be reviewed
and approved by the ROA. (T1). See also paragraph 4.4.2.3.
2.8.35. Identifies, as early as possible, future range activities/actions which may require
environmental analysis under EIAP, and provide this information to the servicing CE office
for inclusion in the appropriate Activity Management Plan (see AFI 32-7062, Comprehensive
Planning). (T2).
2.8.36. Reviews, as early as possible, proposed activities (i.e., exercises) which may involve
foreign nations employing weapons at the range. Collects data for validation of WDZ
footprints, and identifies range limitations which may restrict or prevent foreign
participation. Communicates findings and recommendations to the responsible MAJCOM
office. (T2).
2.9. Installation/Center Chief of Safety.
2.9.1. In coordination with the ROA, develops and implements required programs, practices,
and procedures to reduce risk to the public, personnel and resources, and maximize mission
accomplishment. (T1).
2.9.2. Advises commanders on safety requirements for all operations. (T1).
2.9.3. Provides trained and certified experts for safety oversight/guidance on operational and
test and evaluation issues. (T1).
2.9.4. Provides mission safety requirements for operational and test and evaluation
procedures. (T1).
2.9.5. Develops standardized safety requirements. (T1).
2.9.6. Manages the weapons safety mishap-reporting program. (T1).
2.9.7. Investigates, reports, and identifies corrective actions for safety deficiencies, high
accident potentials, and mishaps. (T1).
2.9.8. Conducts analysis and advises commanders of in-flight impact, explosive, toxic, laser,
directed energy, radiological, and acoustic hazards. (T1).
20 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
2.9.9. Reviews and coordinates all range operations and training documentation. (T3).
2.9.10. Assists in the development of a Wildland Fire Management Plan. (T3).
2.9.11. Before exposing people, equipment, or the environment to hazards during test and
evaluation, obtains and uses safety releases from program offices. (T1).
2.10. Range Safety Personnel.
2.10.1. All RSOs and FSOs are responsible for advising the ROA on the safe conduct of
range operations.
2.10.2. Test Safety personnel have additional safety responsibilities, and reflect those of the
person conducting on-site or direct, real-time monitoring of range operations. Duties may
vary by the type of operation: For Class T services, the RSO duties are typically performed
by the RCO/TACO. For tests requiring the monitoring of a system or operation from a
mission control facility (e.g., a weapon flight test with a Flight Termination System (FTS)
installed) the safety function is usually performed by an RSO on a console. For small test
operations (e.g., a munitions/explosives test) the on-site safety function may be performed by
the Test Director/Manager. Regardless of the personnel or event, some basic on-site RSO
responsibilities are:
2.10.2.1. Be on-site at the operation or in a position to have real-time situational
awareness of events, personnel and assets. (T1).
2.10.2.2. Receive a briefing from (coordinate with) range control/safety on hazards and
mitigating measure as associated with the activity. (T1). This may vary from the
standard range safety SOPs to the restrictions and mitigating measures established by the
AFI 99-103 Safety Review.
2.10.2.3. Ensure an applicable footprint/Hazard Area has been applied to the activity.
(T1).
2.10.2.4. Obtain status of the range and authorization to conduct activity/fire from range
control. (T1).
2.10.2.5. Ensure the Hazard Area is clear. (T1).
2.10.2.6. Ensure proper Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is worn and applicable
safety measures (e.g., as required by the AFI 99-103 Safety Review) are in place. (T1).
2.10.2.7. Monitor flight path and status of weapon/asset, range boundaries and areas of
concern; execute FTS as required. (T1).
2.10.2.8. Suspend activity in event of mishap or significant unforeseen hazard. Contact
Wing/Center Safety as resumption of activity may require Test Execution Authority
(TEA) authorization and a mishap investigation. (T1).
2.10.3. Obtain training and certification as required by the ROA. (T3).
2.11. Installation Civil Engineer.
2.11.1. Provides, sustains, restores, and modernizes the range infrastructure, facilities, and
environment necessary to support the mission. (T1). The supporting CE unit will augment
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 21
these functions if organic or contracted civil engineer teams assigned to the range are not
sufficient to the task.
2.11.2. Maintains an accurate inventory of Air Force-controlled range real property in the
Automated Civil Engineers System (ACES) or successor system. (T1).
2.11.3. Establishes standards for the comprehensive planning, design, construction,
operation, revitalization, and maintenance of real property facilities to sustain their value to
the Air Force, consistent with Air Force policies. (T1).
2.11.4. Assists in the development and submission of funding requests for range
infrastructure and facility requirements. For environmental requirements, assist in the
development of and coordinate funding requests with the supporting Air Force Civil
Engineer Center (AFCEC) Installation Support Team, who will enter environmental funding
requests into ACES (or successor system). (T1).
2.11.5. Delivers services and products normally associated with facility management and
operations to include real property transactions; construction, maintenance, and
revitalization; utilities; and support of real property installed equipment. (T1).
2.11.6. Administers EOD support for range clearance operations IAW AFI 32-3001.
(Tiering IAW cited publication).
2.11.7. Reviews, coordinates, or approves all range-related capability documents to ensure
compatibility with community planning, EOD, UXO, and range clearance operations. This
includes safety plans, environmental plans, comprehensive plans, etc. (T1).
2.11.8. Coordinates range-related environmental programs, plans or actions with the ROA or
designated representative (e.g., ROO) prior to final signature or implementation. (T1). This
includes draft plans which will be submitted to outside agencies for review/approval.
2.11.9. Acts as the liaison office for compliance issues with environmental regulatory
agencies. (T1).
2.11.10. Establishes local procedures and provides subject matter expertise with regard to
environmental compliance and environmental program requirements. (T1).
2.11.10.1. Provides education and training, to include shop level training, to meet
environmental compliance requirements, as needed.
2.11.10.2. Reviews all permits and permitting requirements to ensure that installations
are currently in compliance.
2.11.10.3. Prepares and implements required environmental plans (e.g., INRMPs,
Wildland Fire Management Plans, and ICRMPs) IAW associated Air Force Instructions
and applicable guidance.
2.11.10.4. Develops procedures to address conflicts between military mission objectives
and environmental and cultural resource constraints.
2.11.10.5. Serves as the installation-level EPF for applicable EIAP issues and documents
concerning USAF-operated ranges IAW 32 CFR Part 989.
2.11.10.6. Provides environmental consultation and support for compliance with the
Military Munitions Rule under RCRA.
22 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
2.11.11. Implements, manages and provides support for the range-related portion of
Installation GI&S Program IAW AFI 32-10112. (Tiering IAW cited publication). CE is
the authoritative source and has primary responsibility for all Common Installation Picture
(CIP) layers. Maintain consistent range geospatial data visualization, analysis, and
integration capabilities IAW USAF data strategies and associated standards.
2.11.11.1. Supports range data stewards to assure quality and protection of range
geospatial data, to include recommendations for safeguarding GIS data stored within the
range organization.
2.11.11.2. Facilitates the identification of (and access to) those geospatial data that are
maintained through the GeoBase Service.
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 23
Chapter 3
COMPREHENSIVE RANGE PLANNING
3.1. Comprehensive Range Planning. Comprehensive Range Planning is accomplished to
ensure training and testing requirements are met. This process evaluates range requirements
against current and projected capabilities to identify shortfalls and to guide sustainable range
development to mitigate the shortfalls. This instruction and a hierarchy of plans provide the
policy and guidance that documents the current sustainment and future range development.
3.1.1. Air Force Ranges Strategic Plan.
3.1.1.1. AF/A3OJR publishes an AF Ranges Strategic Plan to identify service-wide
needs and desired strategic direction. AF/A3OJR will initiate a review process for the
AF Ranges Strategic Plan every four years in conjunction with the development and
release of the Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR). The plan has a ten-year planning
horizon.
3.1.1.2. The AF Ranges Strategic Plan consolidates the inputs from MAJCOMs, test
entities, other Services and agencies as applicable to guide enterprise planning. The plan
takes into consideration the way test and training events are conducted. As weapons
systems, instrumentation, threat systems, and testing technologies are developed, the
Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs), Designed Operational Capability (DOC)
statement missions, and training events change over time. As these changes occur, the
strategic plan must consider the following domains in which test and training can be
conducted:
3.1.1.2.1. Live – humans operating actual operational weapons systems with real or
replicated threat systems and/or targets on the range.
3.1.1.2.2. Virtual – people operating any type of simulator.
3.1.1.2.3. Constructive – computer generated entities used to enhance training.
3.1.2. Air Force Training Requirements. Range training-support requirements are based on
the Major Weapons System (MWS) and DOC statement missions and training events of the
assigned units. The Ready Aircrew Program (RAP), MWS Volume (Vol) 1, training
publications and syllabi normally provide the specific events that require range support. The
MWS Events and Assigned Range Users data (Attachments 3 and 4) is a compilation of the
applicable events, required range capability and infrastructure for each specific training event
and are based on the current practices. As MWS, mission types or training events, and/or
TTPs change to meet emerging threats and technologies, the MAJCOM Training Review
Boards (TRB) are instituted to maximize the quality of unit training and convene (usually
annually) to update training events, frequency and standards.
3.1.2.1. The TRBs normally review current and draft unit DOC statements, inspection
schedules and exercise scenarios. They also review operations mishap trends to help
identify training shortfalls/concerns; Operations Group Commander inputs and ongoing
initiatives to improve the quality of unit training throughout the respective Combat Air
Forces (CAF), Mobility Air Forces (MAF), and SOF; and proposed training requirement
(RAP tasking, Vol 1) changes for each crew position by weapon system.
24 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
3.1.2.2. Typically, the TRB goals include ensuring DOC statements reflect current
OPLAN and AEF taskings; training is such that units can meet their DOC missions with
commensurate combat capability levels and the associated training risks are weighed
against all factors; units are training appropriately to meet current threats in applicable
AORs; exercise scenarios match unit wartime missions and training emphasis; and
guidance is updated to help prevent future mishaps.
3.1.2.3. At a minimum, MAJCOMs shall biennially review applicable portions of the
CAF, MAF and SOF TRB recommendations; range user assignments; the range-
supported MWS events; and other applicable training-requirements documents.
Following the review, the MAJCOMs, through ACC as the lead-MAJCOM, will provide
AF/A3OJR with inputs on recommended changes to the MWS Events and Assigned
Range Users data (Attachments 3 and 4).
3.1.2.3.1. The biennial review should ensure a specific range has been tasked to
support each specific training event and that it has the required capability to do so.
Shortfalls necessitating a change to assigned users, or capability and infrastructure
investments shall be supported and based on the published data. Any necessary
changes to assigned users, events or capabilities should be forwarded from ACC to
AF/A3OJR for review and inclusion into this AFI.
3.1.2.3.2. User-event assignments should consider geographic proximity as well as
the scope and attributes required for the assigned event. Planners should not assign a
specific unit to more than one range for the same range event.
3.1.2.3.3. When a MAJCOM does not have an adequate or close-proximity range to
support one of its units, the MAJCOM will engage other range-owning MAJCOMs
and Services for support and assignment of their units. If the shortfall cannot be
serviced, the proponent MAJCOM will submit a T/TSNS to AF/A3OJR for resolution
at the General Officer level.
3.1.2.4. During the biennial review, MAJCOMs should review test and training
requirements to determine the LVC mix and to determine if changes to the range
requirements are needed. This creates a requirement for a continuous modernization
program that will meet test objectives, increase combat realism, aid tactics development,
enhance day-to-day training, and move toward a balanced and appropriate LVC mix.
3.1.3. Non-AF Training Requirements at PTRs. Support of non-Air Force unit training
events on Air Force ranges is often based on historical agreements and/or related to basing
decisions. This support may establish additional range financial obligations and
requirements and must be documented by a written agreement as outlined in paragraph 4.2.
3.1.3.1. The ROA, in coordination with the MAJCOM, will identify the specific events,
training priority, and related range capabilities and infrastructure needed to support the
training (T2); and will determine if the range has the capacity to support the event(s)
while continuing to meet its obligations to the assigned USAF users. (T2).
3.1.3.2. If additional operating hours, capabilities, equipment or infrastructure are
required to support the training, the ROA will document those costs in the written
agreement and will coordinate for reimbursement as authorized. (T1). Ranges will not
assume training requirements or develop/procure capabilities to support users that have
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 25
not been assigned to them in this instruction, unless documented in a written agreement
which has been approved by the range-operating MAJCOM and AF/A3OJR. (T1).
3.1.4. Training Priority at PTRs. Priority is normally determined by the range-operating
Wing. The range-operating Wings and individual ranges must schedule effectively to
adequately support each assigned user in the assigned event as well as non-USAF users who
have entered into a written agreement for support. Ranges are authorized to provide range
access and training support on a space-available basis to non-assigned units but those units
should not normally have priority above assigned users.
3.1.5. Training-Support Requirements at MRTFB ranges. IAW DoDD 3200.11, the MRTFB
may be used by DoD users and by users outside the Department such as US Government
Agencies, State and local governments, allied foreign governments, and commercial entities
for training events. The training requirements must be clearly articulated to determine the
levels of support needed and the priority of the activity.
3.1.6. Training Priority at MRTFB Ranges. IAW DoDD 3200.11, scheduling of the MRTFB
shall be based upon a priority system that gives equitable consideration to all DoD
Components and accommodates DoD acquisition program priorities. The Test Resource
Management Center (TRMC) implements the composition, sizing and usage for the MRTFB.
Priority for training operations on MRTFB ranges is coordinated at the local level through a
robust scheduling and prioritization process that takes into account both test and training
requirements needed to support all users.
3.1.7. Range Test-Support Requirements. Test requirements are based on the characteristics
and attributes of the specific test and are governed by Departmental and Service-level
Directives and Instructions. MAJCOMs, Acquisition Programs, SAF/AQ, and AF/TE
collaboratively define the test requirements and the resources necessary to support them.
3.1.8. Aligning and Deconflicting Test and Training Requirements. Within the Air Force,
the investments needed for test requirements may also be needed for training, and vice versa.
It is imperative to avoid redundancy and gain synergy by closely aligning and deconflicting
test and training requirements. Coordinating these requirements is fiscally responsible and
will result in a more effective use of limited resources.
3.1.8.1. Investments for the ranges under the MRTFB serve test and evaluation as well as
training requirements. Infrastructure investments at these locations are planned and
allocated through different processes, PEs and special access programs. As advanced
weapons systems and threats are developed and tested, the associated TTP development
and training execution drive the necessity for increased synergy and coordination.
3.1.8.2. The Air Force Test and Training Infrastructure Council (AFTTIC) integrates AF
test and training requirement stakeholders into a forum where investment strategies can
be coordinated. This council ensures investment compatibility and synergy, minimizes
duplication of range infrastructure and consolidates range investment priorities.
3.1.9. Test and Training Resource Programs. Test and training requirements are funded
through a combination of institutional funds and reimbursements and/or customer fees at
MRTFB ranges. Test and Training resource funding is managed through Air Force and other
DoD unique PEs. Execution is accomplished by various Air Force field activities.
Headquarters Air Force, Test and Evaluation Infrastructure and Resource Team (HQ
26 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
USAF/TEP) provides test and evaluation resources oversight and guidance to the Air Force
MRTFBs through the parent MAJCOM. The Headquarters Air Force Ranges, Airspace, and
Operations Sustainment Office (AF/A3OJR) provides training resources oversight and
guidance to the Air Force MRTFBs and together with the National Guard Bureau, Air
National Guard Air Space and Ranges Division (ANG NGB/A3A) to the PTRs.
3.1.9.1. Training O&M. PE 27604 and PE 52634 funds PTR O&M, and is programmed
by ACC and NGB/A3 (respectively) through the Air Superiority Core Function Team.
Individual MAJCOM’s execute funding in these PEs for their assigned ranges. The
program funds range contracts, certain range personnel and operations and maintenance
of range capabilities. It also funds technical and service contracts to maintain operating
hours and the basic infrastructure for scoring activities, threat and debrief systems, data
link capabilities and other range services such as road maintenance and range clean up.
3.1.9.2. Test O&M. AFI 99-109 details the PEs and execution agents for Air Force test
requirements.
3.1.9.3. NTTR and Utah Test & Training Range (UTTR) O&M. PE 27428 funds NTTR
and UTTR O&M, and is programmed by ACC through the Air Superiority Core Function
Team. ACC is also the executing agent for this program. The program funds range
contracts, certain range personnel, and operations and maintenance of range capabilities.
It also funds technical and service contracts to maintain operating hours and the basic
infrastructure for scoring activities, telemetry, threat and debrief systems, data link
capabilities and other range services such as road maintenance and range clean up.
3.1.9.4. Improvements/Investments.
3.1.9.4.1. Test and Training Space. Test and Training space attributes accommodate
missions based on TTPs and event requirements. When range planners project a unit
readiness decline due to a deficiency or gap in range capabilities, MAJCOMs should
first attempt to shift the unit assignment to a range with the required capability, or
submit a T/TSNS to meet the shortfall. Such actions involving acquisition, use,
creation, modification, or transfer of range land or airspace generate significant O&M
obligation, public interest and environmental impacts. The Air Force must be
prepared to address budgeting and fiscal constraints as well as concerns raised at the
local, regional, or national level during the development or lifespan of any range or
airspace acquisition or action.
3.1.9.4.1.1. Any action to establish, change use of, modify, or delete test/training
space (including ranges or permanent airspace), except those purely
administrative in nature, are reviewed by units, MAJCOMs, and HQ USAF via
the T/TSNS process detailed in AFI 13-201. (T1). Any changes/closures to
MRTFB ranges that affect capabilities or capacity of the MRTFB must follow the
guidelines and approval process established in DoDI 3200.18, Management and
Operation of the Major Range and Test Facility Base. (T0). Proposal
development will comply with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321–4347. (T0). Proposals can consider single (i.e.,
distinct) actions or numerous actions covered by an overarching plan (i.e.,
Comprehensive Range Plans). NEPA requires proponents for all major federal
projects to consider environmental impacts prior to making an irreversible or
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 27
irretrievable commitment of resources (personnel, facilities or dollars). While
NEPA does not require the decision-maker to choose the most environmentally
advantageous alternative, it does require the decision-maker to make an informed
decision and consider all potential impacts. Refer to 32 CFR Part 989 for specific
guidance. Note: for proposals involving expansion of range boundaries, whether
permanent or otherwise, the T/TSNS must also be coordinated with the AFCEC
Military Munitions Response Program (MMRP) office to identify conflicts and
impacts related to current or projected AF MRRP projects.
3.1.9.4.1.2. Airspace Establishment and Land Acquisition.
3.1.9.4.1.2.1. Airspace. Before establishing a need for new airspace,
proponents must ensure they comply with AFI 13-201, 32 CFR Part 989, and
applicable FAA Orders & Directives.
3.1.9.4.1.2.2. Land. Land acquisitions require lead times as long as 7 years.
There are a variety of mechanisms for acquiring land. Examples include
traditional buy/lease transactions, or withdrawal under the FLPMA (see also
“Land Withdrawal” in terms section of Attachment 1). Proponents need to
work through the Base Civil Engineer with the Unit/MAJCOM, SAF/IE, and
AFCEC to acquire land IAW AFI 32-9001, Acquisition of Real Property.
Factors to be examined when considering the acquisition of land include
confirmation that the proposal cannot be accommodated within or by
modifying existing areas, and issues associated with procuring private land or
withdrawing federal lands. The FLPMA and Title 43, United States Code,
Sections 155-158, Engle Act, require Congressional approval for any public
land withdrawal, reservation, or restriction of over 5,000 acres for any DoD
project or facility. In addition, proponents need to prepare an Environmental
Baseline Survey (EBS) for land acquisitions IAW AFI 32-7066,
Environmental Baseline Surveys in Real Estate Transactions.
3.1.9.4.1.2.3. If funding for range real estate is received in one allotment,
acquisition for all lands should proceed immediately. If funds are received
incrementally over multiple budget cycles, acquisition should proceed
according to a plan that will obtain an initial operational capability at the
earliest date. For example, a range complex providing one Class A and two
Class C service areas can be acquired in three increments. Funds from the
first increment should be used to acquire lands providing the highest benefit to
the Air Force. Each increment should provide an operational capability of its
own.
3.1.9.4.1.2.4. Other Agency Coordination. Agreements with other federal,
state, local, and tribal government agencies should be finalized and signed
during the acquisition phase. In some locations, USAF ranges require liaison
and coordination with many agencies in connection with livestock
management, fish and wildlife conservation, forest management, immigration
and border control, irrigation development, etc. It is important that any issues
affecting operations or safety be settled before the range activation date.
Installation Commanders with jurisdiction over an AF range must ensure
28 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
liaison and coordination with appropriate agencies of federal, state, local, and
tribal governments. Coordination IAW Executive Order 12372,
Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs, 14 July 1982, is required for
any actions that might influence another agency's plans, programs, or projects.
Tribal relations are governed by AFI 90-2002, Air Force Interactions with
Federally-Recognized Tribes.
3.1.9.4.1.3. Moving or establishing a live munitions area is a Major Action and
requires extensive planning and approval. To do so, the ROA will accomplish a
T/TSNS and will comply with the EIAP with the assistance of the parent
MAJCOM. (T0).
3.1.9.4.1.4. Closing or Transferring of Ranges. Ranges under the MRTFB must
follow OSD processes before reducing or closing capability IAW DoDI 3200.18.
(T0). For PTRs and non-MRTFB test ranges, when declared in excess to the
range requirements by the ROA, the MAJCOM and AF/A3OJR, land will be
surface cleared in accordance with AF standards. The ROA will notify the
supporting CE organization with real property responsibility of the excess status
for subsequent action to determine a new use and accomplish required clearance
for the new use. (T1). It is Air Force policy to clear to a level deemed safe for the
proposed future land use and issue Certificates of Clearance for excess ranges or
ranges converted to other uses but remaining on the installation property
inventory. The supporting CE organization will ensure clearance IAW DoDI
3200.16 Operational Range Clearance, excess declaration IAW AFI 32-9004,
Disposal of Real Property, and NEPA actions IAW 32 CFR Part 989. Airspace
transfer will be IAW AFI 13-201, and disposition of government owned range
equipment and facilities will be IAW MAJCOM guidance.
3.1.9.4.2. Range Equipment and Infrastructure. Range equipment and infrastructure
systems provide instrumentation for numerous functions, including OT&E, readiness
training, tactics development and evaluation, command and control, safety, and real-
time flight monitoring. Ideally, these systems provide precise monitoring and
reconstruction, and facilitate post-mission debriefing of range users for various
mission sets (i.e., single or multiple aircraft, ground training, and test missions), to
include reactions to air defense threats, live or simulated ordnance exchanges, and
realistic simulations of the projected threat environment. The requirement for
continuous modernization of these systems drives investments in this area.
3.1.9.4.2.1. Test infrastructure is a key contributor to the test process. AFPD 99-
1 states, “The Air Force will operate, maintain, and improve T&E facilities,
including the Major Range and Test Facility Base and USAF Test Pilot School, in
support of Air Force, DoD, and other user requirements. The Air Force will
continually evaluate test infrastructure requirements and capabilities to ensure
critical test infrastructure is available when needed, and avoid unnecessary
duplication of test resources IAW DoDD 3200.11, Major Range and Test Facility
Base (MRTFB).”
3.1.9.4.2.2. The Test Investment Planning and Programming (TIPP) Process
provides the venue for investing in test infrastructure and is further defined in AFI
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 29
99-109. HQ AFMC/A3 manages the Air Force TIPP process to identify test
resource investments needed to support military systems testing. Those
investments that have possible multi-Service applicability may be referred to the
Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program (CTEIP) for funding IAW AFI
99-109.
3.1.9.4.3. When a range projects that equipment or infrastructure deficiencies will
prohibit them from supporting an assigned training event or an emerging requirement,
the ROA should coordinate with the MAJCOM to have the mission reassigned,
arrange for O&M funding, or coordinate acquisition of the required equipment or
infrastructure with the lead MAJCOM (ACC). AFSOC may seek funding that
supports SOF unique training and has SOF sustainment. In these cases, AFSOC will
coordinate with the lead MAJCOM if it will affect other AF range users. The
acquisition of any EW equipment asset (threat systems, jammers, simulator, etc.),
instrumentation, communication systems or advanced/moving targets used for
training shall be coordinated through the lead operating command to assist in
validating the requirement, defining the priority and justifying the initial and
recurring expenditures. (T1).
3.1.9.4.4. Improvement of existing threats systems is accomplished through AFI 21-
118, Improving Air and Space Equipment Reliability and Maintainability. This
instruction establishes the Electronic Warfare (EW) and ACTS Product Improvement
Working Group (PIWG), which is co-chaired by the Range Threat Systems Program
Office (SPO) and ACC/A3AR. The PIWG interacts with and receives feedback from
equipment users, jointly establish priorities for future efforts, develops solutions to
Reliability & Maintainability (R&M) problems, and provides updates concerning on-
going efforts.
3.1.9.4.5. HQ ACC is the lead agency for procurement of Instrumentation, Threat
Systems, and Test/Training Range Engineering Development supporting CAF
requirements.
3.1.9.4.5.1. The Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center (AFOTEC)
will coordinate on CAF requirements that need an OT&E input or may affect
OT&E as well as DT&E, Force Development Evaluation (FDE), JT&E, and
Expeditionary Force Experiments (EFX).
3.1.9.4.5.2. HQ ACC/A3A will develop and maintain an Equipment Inventory
and Configuration Control system, as part of the ERP. It should accurately
inventory, track equipment, and document the configuration and threat lay-down
plan of threat emitters and simulators used for training.
3.1.9.4.5.3. The reallocation of threat systems will be coordinated by HQ
ACC/A3A with the affected MAJCOMs and AF/A3OJR, with AF/A3 arbitrating
any disputes. Note: this paragraph is not intended to apply to maintenance-
related movements, such as transfers to/from depot.
3.1.9.4.6. New ACTS Requirements. New requirements will be forwarded to
ACC/A3A through the Realistic Training Review Board (RTRB). Requests to
30 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
modify existing equipment will be submitted using AF Form 1067, Modification
Proposal.
3.1.9.4.7. Requests for Disposition of Equipment. No threat or range instrumentation
system will be deactivated, transferred, or decommissioned without MAJCOM
approval. All deactivation/decommission and final disposition requests will be
approved by the parent MAJCOM and HQ ACC with AF/A3OJR arbitrating any
disputes.
3.1.9.4.8. Urban Training Facilities. Constructing or upgrading semi-permanent and
permanent Urban Training Facilities, as defined and covered in DoDI 1322.27,
requires advance coordination. All such proposals require evaluation, and proposals
which will be funded via MILCON also require certification by the Under Secretary
of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (USD(P&R)). ROAs shall submit proposal
information (to include the items listed in Enclosure 3 of DoDI 1322.27) through the
MAJCOM and lead MAJCOM to AF/A3OJR prior to initiating development or
procurement of these capabilities. (T0). AFSOC may submit proposals directly to
AF/A3OJR for projects that support SOF unique training and have SOF sustainment.
A3OJR will consult with OSD, as appropriate, to identify evaluation and certification
requirements for the proposal.
3.1.10. Enterprise Range Plan (ERP). ACC, as the lead-MAJCOM, will produce an
Enterprise Range Plan to coordinate with AF/A3OJR prior to publication. The plan should
have a ten-year planning horizon and support the Air Force Ranges Strategic Plan.
3.1.10.1. The ERP will identify the current mission of each range and identify the range
requirements. This includes detailing necessary test and training capabilities as well as
specifying training requirements for the assigned users. It should compare current and
known future requirements against the current range capabilities to identify shortfalls and
describe investment actions within each of the ten investment areas described in
paragraph 3.1.11.2.3.
3.1.10.2. The ERP should provide tailored direction to each range to guide their
comprehensive range planning. Plan development provides an opportunity for all
MAJCOM organizations and staff to provide inputs, coordinate actions within the
commands and across the MAJCOM staffs. ACC will coordinate the plan with all other
MAJCOMs to ensure their needs and concerns are addressed.
3.1.11. Comprehensive Range Plans (CRPs). Each range will maintain a CRP that outlines
the ROA’s vision and strategy to meet the customer test requirements and the training
requirements of the assigned users while considering the interests of range supporting
organizations. (T2).
3.1.11.1. CRP Installation OPR. The ROA is the installation OPR for the CRP and will
review/update the plan biennially and revise it at least every four years or whenever
significant changes occur. (T2). CRPs will be coordinated with all range supporting
organizations prior to submitting to the MAJCOM for review and approval. (T2). CRPs
for new ranges require additional approval of AF/A3OJR (and AF/TE, for test and
evaluation ranges). (T1).
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 31
3.1.11.2. CRP Format. Each plan will include an executive summary, state the ROA’s
intent/vision, describe the current situation, assess the ten range investment areas, and
formulate a strategy to address assigned user requirements.
3.1.11.2.1. Vision. In this section, identify future capabilities and priorities directed
by higher level plans anticipated to accommodate changing missions, modified tactics
and new weapons systems. This section should include a statement of the ROA’s
intent for the future of the range. Specific thrusts will be captured and organized into
overarching goals.
3.1.11.2.2. Situation. In this section, describe the current state of the ranges and
airspace and any funded improvements. Provide a brief summary of utilization and
maintenance status, list major strengths and major obstacles to accomplishing the
assigned mission. This discussion will conclude with an overall analysis of Strengths,
Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats.
3.1.11.2.3. Range Investment Area Analysis. The main body of the plan is written
for the technical person and analyzes each investment area to identify strengths,
weaknesses, and capability shortfalls. The investment area analysis should validate
requirements in support of the ROA’s intent/vision for the range. It culminates in a
time-phased strategy that identifies specific range objectives that can be used to
justify investments both in the annual budgeting process and to support resource
programming across the FYDP. Over time, strategy execution will be measured
against the plan and documented in subsequent revisions to the CRP.
3.1.11.2.3.1. Land. This investment area includes all surface land and water
areas required for the range that the military owns, leases or controls by easement.
It also includes land or water areas surrounding the range or underlying Special
Use Airspace (SUA) that may be affected by range use.
3.1.11.2.3.2. Airspace. This investment area addresses all airspace controlled by
the ROA. Airspace considerations include proximity to user airfields, airspace
volume and attributes and the utilization as a function of time. Other
considerations include FAA operating relationships and interface with the
National Airspace System (NAS).
3.1.11.2.3.3. Environmental. This investment area includes natural infrastructure
on the range and its short- and long-term effect on the military value of the range.
Management practices and implementation of applicable regulations and policy
are included when they interface with military operations.
3.1.11.2.3.4. Unexploded Ordnance/Range Debris. This investment area
addresses the management of Material Potentially Presenting an Explosive
Hazard (MPPEH) and other range debris on operational ranges. It includes a
program to remove such material and maintain records of use and removal IAW
AFMAN 33-363. Also included are efforts to reduce levels of debris and enhance
clearance practices.
3.1.11.2.3.5. Physical Plant. This investment area involves infrastructure
requirements primarily dealing with Civil Engineering and includes the
construction, upgrade and maintenance of facilities, roads, land, and utilities such
32 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
as water, power, gas, sewage, and drainage.
3.1.11.2.3.6. Scoring and Feedback Systems. This investment area includes Air-
to-Surface scoring systems, air combat mission record and replay capabilities, and
Electronic Attack (EA) analysis systems for feedback. It also includes the
specialized measurement, tracking and analysis systems required to support test
activities.
3.1.11.2.3.7. Communications Systems. This investment area includes Ground-
Air and point-to-point systems and support on the ranges and communications
backbones such as microwave and fiber systems. Also covered are information
protection requirements (such as encryption), spectrum bandwidth considerations,
and radio, data link, and instrumentation frequency management.
3.1.11.2.3.8. Integrated Air Defense/Counter-air Defense Systems. This
investment area covers types and quantities of EW equipment, Information
Warfare and Information Operations assets, Command and Control of EW
systems (i.e., an Integrated Air Defense System (IADS)), jamming systems
(Global Positioning System (GPS), data link, communication/noise), Space
Warfare and Low Observable resources, and the uses of expendables (chaff and
flares) and towed decoys.
3.1.11.2.3.9. Targets and Target Arrays. This investment area addresses the
types and quantities of surface (low, medium and high fidelity) and aerial targets
including realistic threat shells, conventional, strafe, urban warfare, and buried
targets in configurations for covered, concealed, deceived, hardened, mobile and
remote-controlled / towed moving targets.
3.1.11.2.3.10. Management. This investment area addresses overarching
systemic or institutional practices and generally covers procedures and
administration. This area includes such activities as programming and supervision
as well as scheduling issues, the modernization planning process, and reducing
duplication of effort among the ranges. Also included are range functions not in
the other investment areas such as mission control and control/scheduling centers,
safety, noise management and public affairs, and management of the range’s
encroachment and sustainability programs.
3.1.11.2.4. Strategy. This section will provide the specific actions to attain the ROAs
vision and over-arching goals. The investment area analysis should identify specific
objectives supporting the goals. This section will include an approach for
accomplishing and overseeing progress.
3.1.11.2.5. CRP Supporting Documents. The CRP is linked to numerous specialized
documents. It is vital that these supporting documents be readily available and
preserved for the life of the range. All referenced documents will be maintained in a
document management system available to all range staff and available electronically.
(T2). CE is responsible for maintaining all records related to land/water area deeds,
leases, permits, easements, etc. Graphical data sets used to produce graphics and
support analyses will be preserved and continuously updated in a Geographic
Information System that is available to all range staff. (T2).
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 33
3.2. Planning Tools. Each range will maintain documents and graphical information used in
planning IAW AFMAN 33-363 to ensure that records remain available to range staff. (T2).
3.2.1. Document Management System. Documents may be stored and indexed physically or
electronically. If managed electronically, documents should be made available to all range
users and supporters through secure means (request/reply or secure access).
3.2.2. Geographic Information System (GIS). A GIS creates, analyzes, manages (including
maintenance and storage), and presents data with a geographic reference to a physical
location and time. It is the geospatial data component of Comprehensive Range Planning
and refers to the compilation and consolidation of geospatial data to create maps to support
planning decisions. AFI 32-10112 defines the mapping requirements for the CIP and
functional mission dataset data layers.
3.2.2.1. Range Data Layers. Data layers are required in order to perform analysis of
development constraints and opportunities across the range. Data for current and
proposed mission requirements are used to establish limitations and conditions affecting
the range’s abilities to execute and support mission requirements, e.g., target arrays,
emitters, safety footprints, environmental, etc.
3.2.2.2. Data Standards. Geospatial data collected and created in support of
Comprehensive Range Planning must adhere to the data standards of the Air Force
Adaptation of Spatial Data Standards for Facilities, Infrastructure, and Environment.
Range geospatial data will be maintained in this format, and when practical, within the
Installation GI&S system. Ranges that create GIS data internally will ensure it is
compatible with the CIP and provide a means to backup the range data layer.
3.2.2.3. Data Maintenance. Range data stewards will review range functional data layers
and/or mission datasets on no less than an annual basis, and will revise when necessary.
Range data stewards will coordinate updates with their Installation GIO.
34 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
Chapter 4
RANGE OPERATIONS AND SAFETY
4.1. Range Operations. Range operations will be IAW this instruction, AFI 13-201, AFI 11-
214, AFMAN 91-201, Technical Order (T.O.) 1-1M-34, Aircrew Weapons Delivery Manual,
T.O. 1-1M-34-1, Aircrew Weapons Delivery Manual (classified), aircraft specific weapons
delivery T.O.s, aircraft specific AFI 11-2MDS series, and United States Air Force Weapons
School (USAFWS) instructional texts. (T1). For operations involving ground weapons, range
operators should consult AFI 36-2226, Combat Arms Program (as applicable); weapons system
T.O.s; test-specific procedures, and/or specific SDZ profiles for types of operations and weapons
used. Additional operating restrictions during range clearance and maintenance are contained in
paragraph 6.5.
4.2. Written Agreements for AF-Operated Ranges. AFI 25-201 details the required
procedures for entering into written agreements. ROAs should closely coordinate with the
MAJCOM any time the range is agreeing to provide support to an unassigned range user. DoDD
3200.11 and AFI 99-103 address the written agreements and documentation for test support. The
ROA will ensure that all written agreements are maintained in accordance with AFMAN 33-363.
(T1). All agreements pertinent to their range should be readily available to range personnel and
users.
4.2.1. Types of Written Agreements.
4.2.1.1. Support Agreement (DD Form 1144). IAW AFI 25-201, a DD Form 1144 will
be used to document recurring reimbursable support where the AF is the supplier.
(Tiering IAW cited publication). The ROA, in coordination with the MAJCOM, shall
complete an Inter-Service Support Agreement (ISSA) when providing training support
for any non-AF user more than 12 days per calendar year or supporting the recurring use
by another service is a significant portion of range utilization. (T1).
4.2.1.1.1. Ranges may entertain requests and discuss user requirements with any non-
AF user, but the ROA will coordinate and receive approval from the MAJCOM prior
to entering into any agreement for support of non-AF training events that require
commitment of additional resources. (T2).
4.2.1.1.2. Written support agreements are not required for occasional/limited use or
during AF-sponsored exercises, deployments, evaluations, or inspections.
4.2.1.2. Memorandum of Understanding (MOU). A MOU defines general areas of
understanding between two or more parties, when reimbursement is not required. It
neither includes commitment of resources nor binds a party to a specific action.
Individual units normally author these MOUs and coordinate them with the parent
MAJCOM. MAJCOM/JA and the State Department Mission in the host country review
these MOUs for legal implications.
4.2.1.3. Memorandum of Agreement (MOA). A MOA documents the specific terms and
responsibilities that two or more parties agree to in writing, especially those that involve
reimbursement or financial obligations (but without the recurring requirement which
drives a DD Form 1144). It includes either a commitment of resources or binds a party to
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 35
a specific action. Individual units normally author these MOAs and coordinate them with
the parent MAJCOM. MAJCOM/FM, JA, and the State Department Mission in the host
country review these MOAs for legal and financial implications.
4.2.2. Written Agreements for Test and Evaluation Activities. AFI 99-103 details the
extensive documentation processes required for test and evaluation activities. MRTFB
ranges may enter into written agreements via formal documentation and coordination at the
ROA level.
4.2.3. Foreign User Training Support Agreements. Foreign users will submit written
requests for range support through appropriate country offices within SAF/IA to AF/A3OJR.
AF/A3OJR will coordinate with the appropriate MAJCOM to determine the level of support
and to integrate the support requirement into the range mission. The MAJCOM will then
task the ROA to develop the agreement resulting in an MOU or MOA between the range and
appropriate foreign authority. These agreements may also include specific Letters of
Agreement (LOA), a Host-Tenant Support Agreement (HTSA), other support agreements
detailed on a DD Form 1144 and/or Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Letter of Offer and
Acceptance. Each signatory ensures that these agreements meet the needs of the organization
without compromising the mission and without obligating the organization beyond its intent
or authority. ROAs will coordinate the draft agreement with the Office of the Staff Judge
Advocate. (T1). If a conflict arises regarding one of these agreements, the ROA should
resolve the issue at the appropriate level.
4.3. Joint Use of Ranges. Joint Use will be established by the appropriate written agreement(s),
license, contract or other written test documentation between the ROA or test authority (in
coordination with the MAJCOM) and joint user IAW AFI 25-201 or test instructions. All
written agreements should ensure the ROA can terminate user activities detrimental to the
range’s natural, cultural, or physical infrastructure and obtain compensation or redress.
4.4. Shared Use of Ranges.
4.4.1. Shared Use for Test and Training Activities. ROAs will address user requirements
and scheduling to develop a priority policy. (T3). In many instances, a written agreement
between the range scheduling office and assigned range users may be appropriate.
4.4.1.1. 10 U.S.C. § 2681 authorizes the use of MRTFB resources by commercial
entities. DoDD 3200.11 and DoDI 3200.18 provide the guidance for these activities.
Commercial activities on any range must not compromise public safety, detract from
mission accomplishment, nor impair range operations or scheduling in any way.
Prioritization of MRTFB assets for commercial use is outlined in governing directives
and is generally made available only on a non-interference basis.
4.4.1.2. PTRs are not designed or structured to accommodate test and evaluation
activities as defined in AFI 99-103. Should use of a PTR be necessary for test and
evaluation activities, that cannot be accommodated by the MRTFB, all applicable test and
evaluation governing directives, instructions, safety and risk management procedures,
necessary range enhancements, training, additional personnel or upgrades required for the
activity will be accomplished and complied with at the cost to the proponent. In addition,
approval by the parent MAJCOM is required.
36 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
4.4.1.3. In accordance with DoDD 3200.11, the MRTFB may be used by other DoD
users, including DoD training users. MRTFB funding policy is defined in DoD Financial
Management Regulation, Volume 11A, Chapter 12 and AFI 65-601V1, Budget Guidance
and Procedures.
4.4.2. Shared Use for Activities other than Test and Training. Shared use of range land with
non-DoD users is encouraged when it will not compromise public safety, detract from
mission accomplishment, or impair range operations. IAW AFMAN 91-201, public access is
prohibited in areas known or suspected to contain UXO or other munitions that have
experienced abnormal environments. (Tiering IAW cited publication). Requirements in
paragraphs 4.5.2 and 4.5.3 also apply. All visitors granted access to the range must be
briefed on range safety IAW paragraph 4.17.4.4. Shared Use may be characterized as either
Concurrent Shared Use or Non-Concurrent Shared Use. AFI 13-201 provides guidance on
use of DoD airspace.
4.4.2.1. Concurrent Shared Use. Civil activities may occur concurrently with range
operations provided human access is prohibited in the Hazard Area during operations.
Agriculture, grazing and timber management are examples of activities that are
conducive to concurrent shared use. The ROA will determine suitability of all concurrent
shared use programs. (T2).
4.4.2.1.1. Grazing Programs can be a complementary activity on USAF ranges.
Grazing programs will be conducted IAW AFI 32-7064, Integrated Natural Resource
Management. Grazing programs on Department of the Interior lands withdrawn for
USAF use are generally the responsibility of the Bureau of Land Management
(BLM). An INRMP must be prepared for all ranges addressing all issues associated
with natural resources.
4.4.2.1.2. Other Commercial Activities. Air Force ranges may also offer other
commercial uses such as timber management, agricultural out-leasing, and mining.
Again, many of these programs are generally the responsibility of the BLM. The
Bureau of Ocean Energy Management of the Department of Interior manages the oil
and gas exploration on the outer continental shelf applicable to USAF over-water
ranges.
4.4.2.2. Non-Concurrent Shared Use. Civil use of range land may be allowed within the
Hazard Area (exclusive of areas known or suspected to contain UXO) IAW with
paragraph 4.5.3. Recreation and education programs are often compatible because many
ranges encompass large airspace, land, or water areas and may contain significant natural
resources, wild areas, historical sites, or archaeological sites. As custodian of this public
property, the USAF has the responsibility to maintain it in the best manner possible
consistent with the military mission. The INRMP will outline public access to natural
resources. This plan is prepared in cooperation with the US Fish and Wildlife Service and
the state fish and game agency. Additionally, the Cultural Resources Management Plan
will manage and preserve sensitive areas while addressing public concerns.
4.4.2.3. Enhanced Use Leases. Normally Air Force ranges will not be used for EULs.
However, the ROA may deem a EUL compatible with range activity on a case-by-case
basis, provided it will not adversely impact range capability (to include MRTFB
capabilities). The ROA must work closely with the respective installation commander to
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 37
ensure any proceeds generated from the EUL are used to sustain and/or improve the
range capability. The use of EUL proceeds generated by a lease on Air Force range
property, which are not used to sustain and/or improve range capability, must be
submitted to AF/A3OJR for approval prior to obligation of the proceeds. (T1).
4.5. Range Access. MAJCOMs and ROAs will develop procedures for permitting/deconflicting
ground party and non-military activities on the range. (T1). Note: Where the terms Essential
Personnel, and Mission Essential Personnel are used below, reference the “Terms” section in
Attachment 1 of this instruction.
4.5.1. Warning Signs. In addition to the installation warning signs required by AFI 31-101,
Integrated Defense (FOUO), ROAs operating ranges under their direct control will post
safety warning signs (multi-lingual where appropriate) on the boundaries. (T1). Refer to
Chapter 29 of AFI 91-203, Air Force Consolidated Occupational Safety Instruction, for
sizing and general design criteria. Where practical, signs should include both text and
pictograms/symbols describing the hazard. The type of sign (i.e., “Danger” or “Warning”)
will be selected based on the degree of hazard associated with range activities. Ranges
conducting laser operations shall also post laser warning signs utilizing the signage guidance
in MIL-HDBK 828B, Range Laser Safety. (T1). For ranges located on another service’s/host
nation’s property, and where another agency is responsible for range access, security and
signage, the ROA may apply that service/nation’s rules, specified text, graphics, or
procedures. Signs required by this section shall be placed along the boundaries:
4.5.1.1. Where crossed by roads, paths, trails, streams, streambeds or railways.
4.5.1.2. At 200m intervals where roads, paths, trails or railways parallel the range
boundary within 500m.
4.5.1.3. At 1000m intervals in other readily accessible areas not included above. Note:
Signs are not required in areas that are not readily accessible on foot or with wheeled
vehicles (e.g., mountainous terrain, swamps, lakes, etc.).
4.5.2. Impact Areas. The Impact Area is that area on a range immediately surrounding the
target(s) or desired point(s) of impact (DPI) approved for actual ordnance delivery. Public
access to Impact Areas is prohibited at all times. When range Impact Area(s) specific DPIs
are not in use, access will be limited to Essential Personnel. The Impact Area demarcation
will be determined locally using RM analysis IAW paragraph 4.18, but should normally be
no less than either a) 500 feet from the center of a target or DPI approved for live ordnance,
or b) 300 feet from the center of a target or DPI used solely for inert or practice ordnance.
4.5.3. Hazard Areas. The Hazard Area is a composite of all Weapon Danger Zones (WDZs),
Surface Danger Zones (SDZs), Laser Surface Danger Zones (LSDZs), and Directed Energy
Weapon Danger Zones (DEWDZs) for all authorized weapon delivery events, and represents
operational hazards as well as residual hazards following munitions deliveries. Hazard Areas
may be segmented based upon the targets, weapons, tactics, maintenance or clearance being
utilized or conducted at a given time. If Hazard Areas are segmented, ROAs will ensure
segment borders are readily identifiable by ground personnel. Access during operations into
the Hazard Area is limited to Mission Essential Personnel, unless specifically authorized by
the ROA. The ROA shall ensure that personnel accessing a LSDZ or DEWDZ have received
applicable laser/DEW safety training and wear the appropriate personal protective equipment
38 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
(PPE). (T2). Routine access to Hazard Areas not in use should be limited to Essential
Personnel. Public access to Hazard Areas is prohibited until all ordnance employed in the
applicable portion of the Hazard Area is accounted for and appropriate remediation actions
(i.e., decontamination and RM analysis) have been conducted. Access to Hazard Areas will
be determined locally based on an RM analysis per paragraph 4.18. On ranges where another
agency controls Hazard Area access, the ROA will establish procedures to verify access
control and inform that agency of potential hazards. (T2).
4.5.3.1. Weapon Danger Zone (WDZ). The WDZ encompasses the ground and airspace
for lateral and vertical containment of a user-determined percentage of projectiles,
fragments, debris, and components resulting from the firing, launching, and/or detonation
of aviation delivered ordnance. This three-dimensional zone accounts for weapon
accuracy, failures, ricochets, and broaches (resurfacing) of a specific weapon/munitions
type delivered by a specific aircraft type under planned specific delivery release
parameters.
4.5.3.2. Surface Danger Zone (SDZ). The ground and airspace designated for vertical
and lateral containment of a percentage of projectiles, fragments, debris, and components
resulting from the firing, launching, or detonation of weapon systems to include
explosives and demolitions. See the US Army’s Range Manager’s Toolkit Software for
specific SDZ information.
4.5.3.3. Laser Surface Danger Zone (LSDZ) and Directed Energy Weapon Danger Zone
(DEWDZ). The ground area where laser radiation or directed energy levels may exceed
maximum permissible exposure levels thereby requiring controls. In addition, a DEWDZ
may include proximity restrictions to the testing or employment of DEWs with or in
vicinity of conventional munitions to prevent inadvertent functioning or damage. Active
LSDZs or DEWDZs become part of the Hazard Area while such equipment is in use.
4.5.4. Observation Posts (OPs). Notwithstanding paragraphs 4.5.2, 4.5.3, and 4.11.6, OPs
within a hazard area may be used by Tactical Air Control Parties (TACP), JTACs, or other
briefed personnel involved in Close Air Support (CAS)/air-to-ground training, consistent
with the following criteria:
4.5.4.1. ROAs will conduct a risk assessment of the proposed OP or maneuver area prior
to approving their use. (T1).
4.5.4.2. Personnel within the Hazard Area must remain outside the Minimum Safe
Distance (MSD) for Ground Parties (Training Use Only: Live Fire) published in AFTTP
3-2.6, JFIRE Multi-Service Tactics, Techniques and Procedures for the Application of
Firepower. IAW AFI 11-214, if the planned operations/deliveries are inconsistent with
the assumptions used to derive the MSD values, personnel must remain outside the WDZ.
(T1).
4.5.4.3. If there is no published MSD for the weapon or aircraft, submit requests to the
ACC Weapons and Tactics office (ACC/A3TW) for review and approval. Personnel
shall not be allowed inside the WDZ unless such approval is granted. (T1).
4.5.4.4. While inside the Hazard Area, all personnel will wear protective gear IAW AFI
11-214 and AFI 13-112V1, Joint Terminal Attack Controller (JTAC) Training Program.
(T1).
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 39
4.6. Radio Frequency Spectrum Issues. ROAs will identify the Radio Frequency (RF)
spectrum required for range operation and coordinate requirements with the appropriate
Installation Spectrum Manager (ISM). (T1). The ROA will ensure that a frequency assignment
has been obtained by the user (or appropriate Spectrum Management Office supporting the
user’s RF requirements) prior to using any RF emitting equipment. (T1).
4.7. Communications Requirements. The ROA will submit all normal communications
capability requirements to the supporting wing communications function. (T2). Test-specific
systems on ranges under the MRTFB may be obtained by local acquisition methods.
4.7.1. Ranges providing Class A, B and C services will have reliable point-to-point
communications with the parent or using base and manned sites on the range. (T2). During
Class A service, the range control tower will have redundant communications capability with
the flank tower(s) and operations building(s). (T2). All parties or individuals must maintain
two-way voice contact with the main tower, range office, and/or parent base while in the
Hazard Area. (T1). Portable or mobile radios may be used for backup communications and
to maintain contact with personnel in the Hazard Area.
4.7.2. Ranges providing Class A, B and C services will have ground-to-air radios to
communicate with aircraft on the range. (T2). Primary systems will normally be ultra-high
frequency (UHF) radios, but very high frequency (VHF), or frequency modulation (FM)
radios are authorized at ranges where users are similarly equipped. Provision of dual, multi-
band radios should be considered to maximize mission flexibility and safety monitoring
capability.
4.7.2.1. When a range provides Class A service, the RCO is responsible for all range
operations and air/ground safety, except in cases where weapons release clearance is
delegated. The RCO must maintain continuous radio communication with all aircraft and
ground personnel on the range and will have a backup, independent radio. (T2). The
RCO must remain in either the main or flank tower (or another MAJCOM approved
location) while providing Class A service. (T2).
4.7.2.2. During Class B service, ranges must have the capability to communicate with
the aircraft to provide scores. (T2).
4.7.2.3. During Class A and B service, all UHF, VHF, FM and Land Mobile Radios
(LMR) voice frequencies being used on range will be recorded at all times. (T2).
4.7.2.4. The RCO will ensure that all recorders are working properly. Each recording
will contain the range name, date, and time. Recordings will be maintained for a
minimum of 7 days. In addition, recordings containing records of any range incident will
be kept and secured until released by the investigating agency. (T3).
4.7.2.5. All aircraft utilizing the range will monitor Guard frequency. (T0).
4.7.2.6. Aircraft using UHF, VHF, or FM radios on the range will utilize range assigned
UHF, VHF, or FM frequencies. (T1).
4.7.3. Ranges providing Class D service where operations are monitored by a RTO should
have ground-to-air radios to communicate with aircraft on the range and network
connectivity to ground instrumentation receivers when live-monitoring of the mission is
required.
40 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
4.7.4. Communication Operations. Range personnel will normally operate all
communications equipment used on range. Assign communications personnel as radio
operators only when special conditions warrant.
4.8. Armament Safety Procedures. For ranges capable of aircraft ordnance delivery, prior to
first release when carrying expendable ordnance (live, inert, or practice), final switch
configuration for weapon release will not be accomplished until the aircraft is in such a position
that any accidental release will be contained within the range. (T1). MAJCOMs will develop
specific guidance for armament system configurations for multiple passes. After completing
final weapons delivery, each flight member will perform a weapons system safety check. (T1).
Refer to AFI 11-214, aircraft specific AFI 11-2MDS series operating procedures, and individual
range supplements for additional guidance.
4.9. Weapons Release Authority. Acceptance of weapons release authority incurs sole
responsibility for the safe release of ordnance.
4.9.1. Terminology Conventions. To prevent miscommunication, the term “cleared” will
only be used when authorizing weapons release. (T0). For all other matters, “approved”,
“authorized” or any term other than “cleared” will be used. The term “continue” will be used
in the manner described in Joint Publication (JP) 3-09.3, Close Air Support, to acknowledge
requests or indicate approval to proceed with an attack profile or action without providing
clearance to release any ordnance yet. (T0).
4.9.2. On ranges providing Class A service, weapons release authority resides inherently
with the RCO. For each pass, the RCO will authorize weapons release with a “cleared hot”
radio call unless release authority has been delegated. (T1). The RCO may delegate weapons
release authority to a qualified flight lead, individual pilot, Forward Air Controller-Airborne
(FAC[A]), JTAC or other briefed person by issuing an “Authorized (flight lead, individual
pilot, FAC[A], JTAC, etc.) Control” radio call. The RCO, who will remain in either the main
or flank tower (or another MAJCOM approved location), retains overall range authority at all
times and can withdraw release clearance or abort a release at any time. (T2).
4.9.3. On ranges providing Class B and C service, weapons release authority devolves
hierarchically to the JTAC, FAC(A), flight lead, individual pilot or other briefed person who
may then delegate the authority as desired.
4.10. Simulated Weapons Release Authority. Except during flight-lead or individual control,
to emulate the clearance procedures contained in JP 3-09.3, the weapons release authority should
issue a “continue dry” radio call to signify authority to simulate weapons release.
4.11. Weapons Employment and Airdrop Operations.
4.11.1. Do not employ weapons outside approved DoD SUA. (T0). Note: Research and
T&E activities do not require SUA if conducted IAW AFI 99-103, provided appropriate
coordination and approvals are obtained from FAA/spectrum authorities as required.
4.11.2. The land or sea underlying the Hazard Area or failure footprint used for actual
weapon employment must be protected by purchase, lease, or other means to ensure the
safety of personnel, structures, and the public from expended weapons, laser and
electromagnetic emissions, and target debris. (T0).
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 41
4.11.2.1. For events where the weapons footprint will fall outside the lateral confines of
the established rangeland, the ROA will notify the public and will conduct a risk
assessment and take actions to minimize the hazard to the public and non-DoD property.
(T1).
4.11.2.2. ROAs at test ranges will ensure a Flight Termination System (FTS) or other
containment measures are applied to aerial test items (weapons, missiles, UASs, etc.)
having the potential to exceed range boundaries and endanger public or DoD assets and
personnel. ROAs will establish a method of determining the position of the item in
relation to its footprint/range boundary and assess the need for redundancy of position
information, telemetry, and FTS signal transmission based on the potential hazard. (T1).
4.11.3. Except as noted below, ROAs will prohibit weapons employment unless an
applicable SDZ/WDZ footprint or test footprint has been applied to the target for the specific
delivery platform, weapon and employment parameters. (T1). ROAs may expedite analysis
by grouping targets together or combining aircraft type, weapon type, and tactics, as
appropriate. Test footprints are not authorized for training missions, nor are applicable
training footprints, by themselves, sufficient for test missions, but training footprints may be
used as part of the ROA’s overall risk assessment.
4.11.3.1. Where containment is software selectable, ROAs will apply WDZs and SDZs
that provide the following containment of projectiles, fragments, debris and components
as a minimum: (T1).
4.11.3.1.1. Surface fires: 99.9999% (Expressed as 1:1,000,000 escapement for
SDZs).
4.11.3.1.2. Aviation-delivered gun ammunition: 99.999%.
4.11.3.1.3. All other aviation-delivered ordnance: 99.99%.
4.11.3.2. MRTFB and Test Range ROAs are responsible for ensuring test footprints are
developed and applied for test missions. If the application of test footprints would
preclude the accomplishment of test objectives, the ROA, in conjunction with the AFI
99-103 Safety Review may authorize the use of a risk management policy. The ROA will
perform, and the Safety Review must validate, a risk assessment to identify and minimize
hazards consistent with test objectives (see AFI 99-103). (T1).
4.11.4. The WDZ Tool is a multi-service safety tool that helps the ROA conduct safe
training range operations. The tool creates probabilistic weapons impact footprints by
defining aircraft-delivered WDZs per paragraph 4.5.3.1. The WDZ tool software identifies
weapons impact point probabilities from a variety of platforms and parameters, providing an
analytical foundation for sound and objective range planning and execution decision-making.
4.11.4.1. WDZ Tool Methodology. The WDZ tool application methodology allows the
ROA to identify possible target locations, modify allowable delivery ground tracks to
eliminate or reduce hazards, identify the best location for range improvements, or design
a new Impact Area/range. The methodology is based on WDZ footprints developed from
a combination of actual weapon impact data and simulation results. A WDZ defines the
minimum land required to employ a given munition safely, using a certain aircraft and
delivery tactic, over a specific soil density and target type. Each WDZ footprint
42 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
incorporates a probability distribution function (PDF), which provides the information
necessary to perform a quantitative risk assessment and evaluate the relative risk of an
identified hazard.
4.11.4.2. Procuring WDZ Footprints. HQ ACC/A3A is the lead USAF agent for
procuring and modifying WDZ footprints for CAF requirements. MAJCOMs requiring
unique or fast-track WDZ footprints will fund their respective requirements and will
coordinate with ACC/A3A at least 6 months prior to the need date. Foreign countries
will coordinate WDZ acquisition through the Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Case and
submit a Letter of Request (LOR) to the US Navy International Program Office through
their respective embassy at least nine months prior to the need date. Embassies must
email the LORs in PDF format to [email protected]. Foreign participants in
exercises conducted on AF ranges must provide WDZ procurement information to the
appropriate exercise coordination function during the exercise planning process.
4.11.4.3. For allies/foreign countries using same type US aircraft and US weapons,
ROAs may use a US aircraft WDZ in their RM assessment. Notify the MAJCOM and
AF/A3OJR of the use of this applicable WDZ prior to actual employment. ROAs may
also apply a larger buffer, for risk mitigation purposes, if the ally is not a routine
participant and unfamiliar with the range and exercise/training scenario. For unique
foreign aircraft and weapons which are not in the US inventory refer to paragraph
4.11.4.2.
4.11.5. Precautions with Expendable Munitions. Aircraft with free-falling and/or forward-
firing ordnance will not over fly or point their guns at manned sites with intent to expend or
employ weapons. Aircraft with moveable guns, such as helicopters and AC-130 Gunships,
will not point their guns at any manned site. Facilities where the risk of damage is deemed
unacceptable must not be within any footprint.
4.11.6. Weapons Employment near Manned Equipment, Facilities and Sites.
4.11.6.1. Training. In general, manned equipment, facilities and sites, such as range
towers, simulated threat emitter systems, and OPs, may be located within the Hazard
Area during range operations, provided the associated personnel are designated mission
essential, inert ordnance is used, and a risk assessment is conducted and approved by the
ROA IAW paragraph 4.18. See also paragraph 4.5.4 for additional criteria associated
with OPs.
4.11.6.2. Test. The presence of manned equipment, facilities and sites must be addressed
in the risk assessment process described in paragraph 4.11.3.2. Authorized test activities
employing live munitions may locate personnel/equipment (e.g., telemetry/recording
devices) within the Hazard Area only if essential for mission accomplishment, and only
with documented risk management application and approval.
4.11.7. Improved Container Delivery System (I-CDS) and Joint Precision Airdrop System
(JPADS) Deliveries.
4.11.7.1. ROAs will approve I-CDS and JPADS deliveries only if the Precision Airdrop
System-Mission Planner (PADS-MP) derived footprints for success and chute failure
overlay only government owned, leased or otherwise controlled land with no non-mission
essential personnel present and a Collateral Damage Assessment (CDA) acceptable to the
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 43
ROA has been accomplished. (T1). Additional JPADS/I-CDS information is published
in AFI 13-217.
4.11.7.2. If the load will or may transit non-Restricted Airspace during its fall (e.g.,
footprints are not wholly contained within restricted airspace), ROAs will also ensure the
user complies with applicable rules contained in Federal Aviation Regulation 105.25.
(T0).
4.11.7.3. Equipment, facilities and mission essential personnel are permitted within the
success, chute failure and the guidance failure footprints if the ROA has conducted and
approved a risk assessment IAW paragraph 4.18.
4.11.7.4. Because users utilize weather observation and dropsonde (an expendable,
aircraft-launched weather measurement device) wind updates to revise their footprint
analyses up until the time of delivery, ROAs should ensure the user is aware of the ROAs
exclusion requirements and be provided with the location of airspace/range boundaries
and any personnel or equipment the ROA cannot or chooses not to allow in the footprint
as part of his/her risk analysis.
4.12. Jettison Areas. All ranges with aerial delivery capability will have an area within the
Hazard Area designated for jettison of ordnance and stores. The location of jettison areas and
jettison procedures will be designed to minimize the hazard to the public, ground personnel and
range structures as well as aircraft and aircrew.
4.13. Electronic Warfare Training Operations. EW Training Operations facilities provide a
realistic electronic threat environment for aircrew training through the use of Surface-to-Air
Missile (SAM) and Anti-Aircraft Artillery (AAA) threat emitter simulators. These facilities also
provide EW support for composite force training, unit exercises, unit gunnery competitions,
normal training missions, and higher HQ exercises or inspections. To fulfill these requirements,
EW threat equipment and operating procedures should closely parallel those of the anticipated
enemy threat systems.
4.13.1. Electronic Warfare Sites. EWSs are normally located under or near instrumented
MTRs, MOAs, and/or Air Traffic Control Assigned Airspace (ATCAA) and only require a
small land area for equipment location. An EWS has the capability to provide mission
debriefings detailing individual aircrew or large force analysis/feedback on the effectiveness
of EA and threat avoidance procedures.
4.13.2. Electronic Warfare Ranges. EWRs are collocated with ranges (traditionally those
that support surface fires and actual ordnance delivery). EWRs may or may not have the
capability to provide analysis/feedback on the effectiveness of package or individual aircrew
EA and/or threat avoidance procedures, and EW training capability may vary from limited to
robust. EWRs typically consist of multiple geographically separated threat emitters
coordinated to simulate an IADS. Mobile emitters are used to provide scenario flexibility.
4.13.3. Electronic Warfare Personnel Training. To provide a realistic threat environment for
aircrew combat training, EWR/EWS electronic threat operators will have a working
knowledge of EW doctrine and employment concepts.
4.13.3.1. Training Programs. Management criteria, administrative practices, and training
policies required to conduct a comprehensive EWR/EWS training program will include
44 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
academics and practical application in live and simulated environments. EWR/EWS
personnel should be familiar with applicable MAJCOM training events and requirements
defined in AFI 11-2MDSv1s and Ready Aircrew Program (RAP) Tasking Messages.
4.13.3.2. Responsibilities. ROAs are responsible for the selection and written
designation of instructor personnel who will conduct site training for government
personnel. The unit training officer/site manager is responsible for developing the unit
training programs, training schedules, quarterly and annual unit training plans, and lesson
plans, and is the unit approving authority for all unit-developed training courses or
programs. For contractor run operations, the ROA must ensure the contract contains the
minimum training requirements as documented in Attachment 5.
4.13.4. ROAs will make every effort to provide scores/feedback for requested EW activity.
These shall be documented and delivered in a mutually agreed upon format.
4.14. Flare and Chaff Employment. Unless further restricted by MAJCOM or local
supplements, flares will be employed IAW AFI 11-214, while chaff will be employed IAW the
latest version of Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Manual (CJCSM) 3212.02, Performing
Electronic Attack in the United States and Canada for Tests, Training and Exercises, and AFI
11-2MDS series instructions. This guidance assumes use of current inventory flares and chaff, a
frequency authorization for chaff, and an adequate environmental analysis of the use of flare and
chaff. The use of flare or chaff cartridges having significantly different characteristics
(pyrophoric flares or double squibbed chaff) is restricted to authorized test and evaluation
activities until their use is authorized by the appropriate MAJCOM.
4.15. Global Positioning Satellite Electronic Attack. GPS EA in DoD tests, training, and
exercises will be employed IAW the latest version of CJCSM 3212.03, Performing Tests,
Training, and Exercises Impacting the Global Positioning System, and classified supplement.
These activities require approval from Commander, US Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM).
4.15.1. GPS EA Requests and Approvals. All GPS EA requests must be officially
sanctioned by a DoD organization or authorized contractor (under contract with a DoD
organization) and conducted for DoD purpose to ensure forces can operate in an intense
electronic warfare environment. (T0). Requests must be developed and submitted IAW the
procedures established in CJCSM 3212.03. (T0).
4.15.2. GPS EA Employment. Teams conducting these operations will maintain positive
control of GPS jammers. (T0). For range safety, the ROA will provide the teams operating
GPS jamming equipment with a primary and alternate means of communications. (T1).
4.15.2.1. Ranges must provide dedicated Cease Buzzer telephone numbers for the
duration of the GPS EA employment. (T0). These telephone numbers must be provided
with the initial request package. Any change to Cease Buzzer numbers must be provided
to Air Force Spectrum Management Office by either the range or the proponent in an
updated request to be forwarded to US Strategic Command and received by FAA HQ
NLT than seven days prior to event execution. (T0).
4.15.2.2. Ranges must provide the GPS jamming teams with the capability to monitor
guard and range operations channels. (T0).
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 45
4.15.2.3. Notifications prior to and post GPS EA operations must be made in accordance
with the GPS EA approval message from USSTRATCOM (and FAA or USCG
concurrence messages, if applicable). (T0).
4.15.2.4. Cease Buzzer notifications must be made in accordance with GPS EA approval
message from USSTRATCOM and the procedures defined in CJCSM 3212.03. (T0).
4.16. Laser and Directed Energy Weapons Operations.
4.16.1. Laser Device Range Operations. The ROA will not authorize laser device operations
unless the range is certified IAW AFI 48-139 with guidance established in MIL-HDBK-
828B, Range Laser Safety. (T1). Examples of laser devices include designators,
rangefinders, and illuminators/pointers.
4.16.2. Directed Energy Weapons Range Operations. The ROA will not authorize DEW
operations (to include, but not limited to, high-energy lasers, weaponized microwave and
millimeter wave beams, explosive-driven electromagnetic pulse devices, acoustic weapons,
laser induced plasma channel systems, non-lethal directed energy devices, and atomic-scale
and subatomic particle beam weapons) unless the weapon has been certified (or approved for
testing) IAW AFI 91-401, and the range has been certified for the weapon. (T1).
4.16.3. Research and T&E Activities.
4.16.3.1. Research and T&E activities involving laser devices/DEW do not require range
certification if conducted IAW AFI 99-103 and applicable research & test management
instructions. Include the Installation Laser Safety Officer and Bioenvironmental
Engineer Office, as applicable, on the AFI 99-103 Safety Review hazard assessment
team. (T1). The Safety Review must show the control of the hazards from the beginning
of operations commencing until termination. (T1).
4.16.3.2. Hazards extending beyond restricted airspace or controlled government land
must show the appropriate levels of federal and local coordination are in place. (T1). The
Installation Commander or ROA is the final approval authority in lieu of formal range
certification. Additional expertise regarding T&E can be obtained by contacting the
711th Human Performance Wing (711 HPW) or the Air Force Research Laboratory
(AFRL).
4.16.4. AF Range Certification. The ROA will request laser device and/or DEW range
certification through the MAJCOM to the 711 HPW/RHD. 711 HPW/RHD will report
certification results to the ROA, base bioenvironmental engineer, and MAJCOM. (T2).
4.16.4.1. Laser device range evaluations will be conducted by 711 HPW/RHDO in
collaboration with other agencies as needed to enable safe mission accomplishment.
Evaluations will include an on-site survey, a review of proposed activities (weapons,
targets, and tactics) and provide range-specific laser safety footprints, safety
recommendations, and systems approved for use on that range. (T1).
4.16.4.2. DEW evaluations will be a collaborative effort between 711 HPW/RHD,
AFRL/RD, and any other agency needed to ensure foreseeable health and material safety
concerns are considered. (T1).
4.16.5. Certification Annual Reviews. The LSO and/or DEWSO will review applicable
operations with the ROO/ROA annually (within 45 days of the certification report’s
46 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
anniversary) to ensure activities are within the scope of the current range certification. (T2).
If any activities or physical changes to the range are found to be outside the scope, the
affected laser operations will be terminated until they have been evaluated and incorporated
into the range certification. (T1). Contact the 711 HPW/RHD certifying agency for
assistance. Note: the previous two sentences do not apply to research or T&E activities,
provided the conditions in paragraph 4.16.3.1 have been met. Report findings from the
annual review to the MAJCOM and certifying agency. (T2).
4.16.6. Certification Validity. Certifications expire at the end of the third fiscal year
following issuance (e.g., a certification dated 3 December 2006 expires on 30 September
2010). Upon expiration, the certification must be re-accomplished IAW paragraph 4.16.4
before covered activities may resume. (T2). Prior to expiration, the certification is valid for
the equipment, aircraft, targets, tactics and weapons evaluated as long as the report’s
recommendations are complied with, land and airspace boundaries remain unchanged, annual
reviews are submitted to the MAJCOM and certifying agency within 45 days of the initial
report’s anniversary, and laser specular hazards are periodically removed (as specified in
paragraph 4.16.8.4). The reinstatement or extension of a certification will be at the discretion
of the AFRL certifying authority based on the scope of changes.
4.16.7. Laser Clearinghouse (LCH) Coordination. Use of lasers or laser systems, regardless
of classification, that have the potential to propagate above the horizon requires coordination
with the US Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) LCH in accordance with DoDI 3100.11,
Illumination of Objects in Space by Lasers, and Chairman of the Joints Chiefs of Staff
Instruction (CJCSI) 3225.01, Illumination of Objects in Space by Lasers. (T0). For
information on coordination, contact the LCH at DSN 276-1075/4341 (commercial 805-606-
1075/4341). In accordance with current JFCC Space policy, deconfliction is not required for
the following categories:
4.16.7.1. Hand-held lasers.
4.16.7.2. Laser ranging and targeting systems developed for air-to-ground or ground-to-
ground applications.
4.16.7.3. Laser glint from all targets (space based, water based, air based, and ground
based).
4.16.8. General Requirements for Laser Devices and Laser DEW.
4.16.8.1. Lasers will not be operated without the approval of the LSO and the ROO
(RCO during Class A service). (T2).
4.16.8.2. The user will notify the ROO or RCO upon termination of laser activity. (T3).
The ROO or RCO will acknowledge termination and will record the start and stop time of
range periods when laser operations take place. (T3).
4.16.8.3. Ground lasers will not be directed at targets or Hazard Areas where the laser
beam will terminate with an ocular hazard beyond the range boundary unless the
hazardous laser energy will exclusively transit Restricted Airspace (or equivalent) up to
an altitude of 60,000 feet (Flight Level 600), and terminate in space without affecting
non-participating satellites. (T0).
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 47
4.16.8.4. Specular hazards will be periodically removed from the LSDZ surrounding the
targets; reference guidance in MIL-HDBK-828B as necessary. (T2).
4.16.8.5. IAW AFI 48-139, the director of Base Medical Services will be notified of the
specific types of laser activities that occur on the range and medical surveillance
requirements for range personnel (as determined by a qualified medical provider) will be
accomplished before working in a laser hazard environment. (Tiering IAW cited
publication).
4.16.8.6. IAW AFI 48-139, all range personnel within the Laser Surface Danger Zone
(LSDZ) during laser operations will wear laser eye protection of appropriate optical
density. (Tiering IAW cited publication).
4.16.9. General Requirements for Non-Laser DEW.
4.16.9.1. Non-laser DEW systems will not be operated without the approval of the
DEWSO and the ROO (RCO during Class A Service). (T2).
4.16.9.2. The user will notify the ROO or RCO upon termination of DEW activity. The
ROO or RCO will acknowledge termination and will record the start and stop time of
range periods when DEW operations take place. (T3).
4.16.10. Injury Reporting. Report laser injuries IAW AFI 48-139 and radio frequency
radiation injuries IAW AFI 48-109, Electromagnetic Field Radiation (EMFR) Occupational
and Environmental Health Program. (Tiering IAW cited publications).
4.16.11. Laser Weapon, Device and DEW Certification on Foreign and Other US Service
Ranges. When USAF aircraft operate on another nation’s/service’s range, MAJCOMs will
ensure procedures have been developed and are promulgated by the host nation/service prior
to employing lasers weapons, devices and/or DEW systems. (T1). In the event procedures
have not been developed, laser weapon, device and DEW operations will comply with this
instruction. (T1).
4.17. Range Safety.
4.17.1. Visual Identification of Manned Equipment, Facilities and Sites. To the maximum
extent possible, equipment and facilities, manned or unmanned, that are not targets should
include visual identification systems, such as high contrast paint (white or orange), IR
strobes, etc. White or orange paint shall not be used on any “bombable” targets with the
exception of strafe “rags” or specific test targets where white supports test objectives. (T1).
4.17.2. Range Demonstrations and Visitor Procedures. Each ROA must publish or reference
procedures in their local range supplement to ensure positive control of all spectators. (T3).
Visitor locations must be analyzed using the appropriate weapons footprint/hazard area
program to ensure that spectators are not within the hazard area during operations. (T2). The
ROA will have control in those limited cases where DoD personnel or contractors must be
within the hazard area during operations to accomplish a specific mission-related task. (T2).
4.17.3. Flight Safety.
4.17.3.1. Airspace Activation. The RCO will activate range airspace with the local ATC
facility or Air Traffic representative IAW local agreements between the ROA and the
controlling agency. (T0). The request for activation should be timed (before a scheduled
48 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
mission) to allow shared or joint users to clear the area and for the controlling agency to
make internal adjustments.
4.17.3.2. Weather Observation. The RCO will monitor weather conditions to include
altimeter setting, temperature, ceiling, visibility and winds. (T2). Observations may be
obtained from the local base weather station, command post, Automated Weather
Observing System (AWOS), or ATC agency at least hourly, if the capability is not
available at the range. The local weather detachment or command post should advise the
RCO of any sudden adverse weather changes that might affect range operations or safety.
4.17.3.3. Avian Hazard Advisory System (AHAS). Where internet connectivity permits,
RCOs will utilize AHAS (http://www.usahas.com) to monitor bird movement and bird
strike risk levels for the airspace associated with the range. (T2).
4.17.3.4. Aircraft Accident Procedures. In case of an aircraft crash during Class A
service, the RCO will initiate all necessary emergency actions. (T1). These include
appropriate notifications, closing of the range, and assuming responsibility as the interim
on-scene commander until the crash response team can be organized. During Class B,
Class C, and Class D service, the flight lead, individual pilot, FAC(A), JTAC or other
briefed person will start the emergency actions, and if feasible, act as the interim on
scene-commander. Investigations will be conducted IAW AFI 91-204, Safety
Investigations and Reports.
4.17.4. Ground and Explosive Safety.
4.17.4.1. Fire Prevention. Identify range activities likely to cause range fires, and
develop and implement procedures to mitigate them. Identify a single agency or office
responsible for determining the fire danger hazard level, typically in cooperation with the
land management agency. Develop a decision matrix and checklist to standardize fire
prevention actions and ensure appropriate responses as fire conditions change. Include
fire prevention in the Wildland Fire Management Plan, CRP, and range supplement. (T3).
4.17.4.2. Fire Suppression Equipment. On ranges providing Class A or manned Class B
or T services, appropriate fire suppression equipment and personnel must be available to
deal with local fire hazards. This capability may be provided through USAF, host
military organization for tenant units, landowner, in-service civilian, independent
contractor assets, or through agreement with another government agency such as the
BLM or US Forest Service. The ROA in coordination with the agency/organization
providing fire support shall identify the fire suppression equipment requirements and will
ensure that sufficient fire suppression equipment is assigned directly to the range for
emergency use. (T2).
4.17.4.3. Emergency Procedures. Emergency procedures will be readily available to the
RCO and other ground personnel, such as JTACS, for use during range operations.
4.17.4.4. Safety Briefing Requirements. The ROA or contractor will provide and
document initial and yearly ground and explosive safety briefings IAW AFI 91-202, to
personnel assigned to operate and maintain Air Force ranges. (T2). The ROA will ensure
all personnel participating in range clearance operations receive additional training IAW
paragraph 6.4.2 before assisting in range clearance. (T2). The ROA must also ensure that
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 49
authorized visitors and personnel who infrequently visit the range are appropriately
briefed on range safety. (T2).
4.17.4.5. Hazard Condition Watch. The RCO and all range personnel must continually
watch for hazardous conditions such as trespassers, fires, bird activity conditions, etc.
Range users will be notified immediately of any hazardous conditions on the range. If
safety is in question, the RCO or other appropriate authority will stop range operations
until the situation is remedied. (T3).
4.17.4.6. Performance during Critical Tasks. During the performance of critical
situational tasks such as controlling or monitoring the movement of aircraft or ground
parties using the range, personnel must not conduct unrelated activities which divert their
attention, degrade situational awareness or prevent timely communications. (T3). Such
distracting prohibitions include composing and sending emails and text messages
unrelated to the mission at hand, browsing web pages unrelated to the mission and
making and receiving unofficial phone calls.
4.18. Risk Management Program. ROA responsibilities related to RM are detailed in
paragraph 2.8.22. Range operations are complex and the RM process requires a dedicated team
representing multiple functional areas such as operations, CE (to include EOD), legal, public
affairs, and safety. Utilize the RM process prior to any change to range operations, boundaries,
or procedures with the potential to increase flight, ground or explosive safety risks. The RM
assessment examines type of ordnance authorized, employment tactics, weapons footprints, type
of proposed joint or shared use, geographic features, frequency of EOD sweeps, etc. Coordinate
assessments through the wing (or equivalent) POC for RM matters.
4.19. Night Operations.
4.19.1. Aircraft reduced, covert and blacked-out lighting operations will not be conducted
during Class A service unless the RCO is equipped with binocular, generation-III NVDs.
(T2). NVDs will be tested, adjusted and focused by the RCO before use with (in order of
preference) the Hoffman ANV-20/20 Tester, a unit eye lane or equivalent tester. (T2).
Perform NVD testing, adjustment and focusing procedures IAW appropriate T.O.s and
MAJCOM guidance. (T2).
4.19.2. Range Lighting.
4.19.2.1. Class A Service Identification Lighting. Ranges providing Class A services
that support night operations must have available a distinctive pattern of lights visible by
aircrews, with and without NVDs, to ensure positive orientation and identification of the
range and target area. (T2). These lights should be readily identifiable but not so as to
distract aircrews during weapons delivery or wash out target locations. ROAs will ensure
that no similar pattern of lights exists near the range that could be misidentified as targets
or the Impact Area, but cultural lighting inside or outside the range boundary may serve
as a portion of the distinctive pattern of lights. (T2).
4.19.2.2. Class B Service Identification Lighting. Ranges providing Class B services
that support night operations will have lighting as described above unless the ROA has
determined that the lighting is not required based on a documented, RM analysis (based
on range size, remoteness, etc.) (T2).
50 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
4.19.2.3. Target Lighting. Lighting for the specific purpose of illuminating the target is
only required on ranges that support users accomplishing unaided visual deliveries. If
required (or desired by other users), target lighting may be accomplished using
incandescent lights, lanterns, or flares. Lights and lanterns should be NVD compatible or
reduced in intensity to produce the minimum halo around each light when viewed
through NVDs. Every effort should be made to prevent the target from appearing as a
light with a halo to allow positive target identification.
4.19.2.4. Range Facility Identification.
4.19.2.4.1. Range Tower and Routinely-Manned Facility Lighting. Lighting is
required on all routinely-manned range facilities and range towers to facilitate
positive identification by aircrew. (T2). Proper management of tower lighting is
important to maximize performance of NVDs used by range personnel. Tower
lighting (interior and exterior) should be minimized to those necessary to conduct
operations and all unnecessary lights should be extinguished or taped over. NVD
compatible lighting is highly recommended. Consider moving tower, routinely-
manned facility and obstruction strobe lights to locations that will best support night
operations.
4.19.2.4.2. Other Manned Locations. Other manned locations (such as OPs, visitor
locations, vehicles, etc.) will, as a minimum, mark their location by any means
described in JP 3-09.3 for “friendly marking” that facilitates positive identification by
aircrew. (T0).
4.19.3. IR Pointers and/or Lasers. A single, steady IR pointer will not be used as the sole
means of target identification. (T1). If using an IR pointer to mark targets, either the target
or friendly terminus of the pointer must be positively verified by another means (snaking,
friendly location marking, etc.). (T1). When ground based lasers/designators are used to
designate targets, attack headings within ±10° of the laser designator to target line (safety
zone) are prohibited and run-in headings are restricted to a 50° cone on either side of the
safety zone. (T1). Per AFI 48-139, personnel will not be exposed to laser radiation in excess
of the Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE) levels as defined in ANSI Z136.1, and
unnecessary exposures to laser radiation below the MPE will be avoided. (Tiering IAW
cited publication).
4.20. Supersonic Flight. Supersonic flight restrictions within the US National Airspace System
are contained in AFI 13-201. Overseas locations will comply with host nation rules.
4.21. Training on Non-Federal Property. Training activities conducted on non-federal real
property are outside the scope of this instruction. Units wishing to conduct training on non-
federal land must comply with DoDI 1322.28.
4.22. Range Operations Support.
4.22.1. Supply. The ROA should establish procedures with the parent or servicing base
supply organization to obtain materials for range operations, as well as salvage and disposal.
When required, establish a separate supply section at the range to administer all supply
activities.
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 51
4.22.2. Vehicles. The use of Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) vehicles in contract
operations should be kept to a minimum. A cost analysis must be accomplished prior to use
of GFE vehicles to determine the best value to the government.
4.22.3. Utilities. The ROA will ensure ranges are provided the utilities (gas, water, electric
and sewer) required to enable range operations. (T3). Commercially provided services
should be used when available, suitable and cost-effective.
4.23. Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS)/Remotely Piloted Aircraft (RPA). ROAs shall
conduct a Risk Management assessment of UAS/RPA operations and apply appropriate
mitigation measures prior to employment on the range. At a minimum consider:
4.23.1. Kinetic energy potential for lethality and property damage.
4.23.2. Flight paths to avoid endangering concentrations of DoD and civil assets/personnel.
4.23.3. System maturity and employment methodology
4.23.4. Mid Air Collision Avoidance through see/sense and avoid, spotter, or chase aircraft.
4.23.5. Airspace and Air Traffic Control coordination. See FAA publications for flight
requirements in the National Airspace System.
4.23.6. Robustness and redundancy of vehicle control/telemetry.
4.23.7. Containment measures such as a Flight Termination System, lost link software, or
parachute.
52 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
Chapter 5
TRACKING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
5.1. Reporting Requirements. Ranges will utilize CSE as the database to track range use such
as scheduled and actual mission information, supporting range equipment, munitions used, etc.
(T-1). Note: this does not apply to Class-T ranges that do not manage or use airspace, provided
the parent MAJCOM has waived the requirement to use CSE IAW paragraph 2.8.17. Classified
information, if any, must be maintained separately (outside of CSE).
5.2. Expended Munitions Tracking. IAW DoDD 4715.11, Environmental and Explosives
Safety Management on Operational Ranges Within the United States; and DoDD 4715.12, ROAs
will maintain records of all expenditures (types, quantities, locations, using organization, and
estimated dud rates) of ammunition and explosives for each target. (T0). Data will be recorded
in CSE when possible and by any other means when not. (T1). Note: in addition to munitions
employed by range users, this requirement also applies to munitions employed by the range
operator in support of test or training activities (e.g., Smokey SAMs).
5.3. Range Clearance Report. This report is a detailed report of clearance events and will
precisely identify the areas that have been cleared and include the number of people and the
amount of money and material used to accomplish the work. (T0). When closing or transferring
ranges the range clearance report will be attached to the Certificate of Clearance which becomes
an official document certifying that all dangerous and explosive materials reasonably possible to
detect have been removed. (T0).
5.4. Defense Readiness Reporting System. IAW AFI 10-252, Defense Readiness Reporting
System, units responsible for reporting range readiness will report between 1 – 31 October
annually, or within 72 hours of a change as outlined in AFI 10-252 paragraph 4.2. (T1).
5.5. Threat Systems/Equipment Inventory. Based on the threat systems/equipment required
for each range as outlined in Attachment 3, each range-owning MAJCOM shall produce and
maintain an inventory of threat systems/equipment (types and quantities) each range possesses
and an inventory of threat systems/equipment each range requires, but does not possess.
5.5.1. Include Air Combat Maneuvering Instrumentation, Threat, Electronic Attack, and
Feedback and Scoring systems in the inventory.
5.5.2. Provide the inventory to ACC for inclusion in the ERP.
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 53
Chapter 6
RANGE MAINTENANCE AND CLEARANCE OPERATIONS
6.1. Range Management Guidelines. Each MAJCOM/ROA is responsible for the clearance of
operational ranges under its control IAW DoDI 3200.16, DoDI 4140.62, Management and
Disposition of Material Potentially Presenting an Explosive Hazard (MPPEH), and Title 40
CFR, Parts 260-270. Furthermore, each MAJCOM/ROA must dispose of radioactive wastes
IAW the Air Force Radioactive and Mixed Waste Office (AFRMWO) and AFI 40-201,
Managing Radioactive Materials in the US Air Force.
6.1.1. Funding and Scheduling Range Clearances. The ROA is responsible for funding and
scheduling all MPPEH/range clearance, and should include clearance activity planning in the
CRP. The ROA should publish a readily accessible clearance schedule. The ROA or ROO
may temporarily postpone range clearance on a case-by-case basis for severe weather or
other unforeseen circumstances that warrant delays.
6.1.2. EOD Support for Range Clearances. Development of the annual range clearance plan
will be a collaborative effort between the ROA and the associated EOD unit (or MAJCOM)
finalized at least six months prior to the first clearance activity. (T2). If there is no organic
EOD capability, establish a policy agreement document for range clearance support with the
nearest Air Force EOD flight, if practicable; or if not with the nearest non-AF EOD unit via a
MOA and/or ISSA. (T2). Attempt to synchronize clearances with EOD deployment cycles
or periods of high EOD operations tempo.
6.1.2.1. When the requirement for range clearance support exceeds the capability of the
associated EOD unit, shortfalls are managed within the EOD Information Management
System (EODIMS) Range Support Tasking (RST) program. The associated EOD unit (or
MAJCOM) will enter RST requests into EODIMS as required to meet clearance
requirements.
6.1.2.2. Prepare a plan for range clearance operations that at a minimum considers the
number of personnel involved, types of ordnance anticipated to be encountered and/or
recovered, expected levels of contamination, and support requirements. (T2).
6.1.2.2.1. The ROA will ensure the plan provides sufficient time to complete the
planned and anticipated range clearance operations safely. (T2).
6.1.2.2.2. Consider requesting an advanced echelon (ADVON) element from the
supporting EOD unit to conduct a GPS mapping survey of UXO-contaminated areas
and debris-densities/distances around the targets at least two weeks prior to arrival of
the main body for workload estimates and to finalize clearance planning.
6.1.2.3. Finalize all ROA range scheduling and EOD RST support at least 45 days before
the start of the clearance operation. (T3).
6.1.3. To identify, safeguard, and dispose of UXO, ROAs will ensure the following are
accomplished:
6.1.3.1. Safely clear UXO from ranges consistent with the stated mission of the
installation and for the continuing viability of the range. Resolve all conflicts between
54 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
explosive safety and other requirements with the objective of minimizing explosive
hazards. Controlled burning will not be used to accomplish UXO clearance, but may be
used to support UXO clearance if environmental and safety requirements are met. (T1).
6.1.3.2. Respond promptly to protect personnel and property from any UXO located off a
military installation IAW AFI 32-3001. (Tiering IAW cited publication).
6.1.3.3. Notify installation personnel and the public, as appropriate, if any range
operation presents a potential explosive hazard off the range. This includes informing the
public of any mishap that could influence the local community and may require
additional precautions and/or restrictions. (T2).
6.1.3.4. Respond immediately to off-range releases or substantial threats of off-range
release of hazardous UXO constituents, when such release or threat of release poses an
imminent and substantial threat to human health or the environment IAW DoD Response
authorities under 10 U.S.C. § 2701, Environmental Restoration Program, and 42 U.S.C.
§ 9604, Response Authorities. (T0). Consult with EOD and environmental offices on
response actions and coverage under the AF environmental restoration program.
6.1.3.5. On operational ranges, the procedures for evaluating and responding to
explosives safety, human health, and environmental risks will be IAW AFMAN 91-201
and Title 40 CFR Parts 260-270.
6.1.3.6. Conduct cluster munitions release on designated Impact Areas only and make all
reasonable attempts to employ inert and live cluster munitions on different targets. (T0).
6.1.3.7. To the maximum extent practicable, designate separate Impact Areas for live and
inert ordnance training. (T1).
6.1.3.8. Maintain permanent records of:
6.1.3.8.1. All expenditures (types, quantities, locations, using organization, and
estimated dud rates) per target of ammunition and explosives IAW DoDD 4715.11.
(T0).
6.1.3.8.2. All mishaps attributed to UXO that occur on or off the installation IAW
DoDI 6055.07, Mishap Notification, Investigation, Reporting, and Record Keeping.
(T0).
6.1.3.8.3. All EOD incidents or range clearance operations conducted on ranges.
(T0).
6.1.3.8.4. All areas known or suspected to contain UXOs using a geographic
information system, range maps and/or installation master planning maps in
compliance with the Spatial Data Standards for Facilities, Infrastructure, and
Environment. Conduct historical research as necessary. (T0).
6.1.3.9. Remove all munitions debris from targets awaiting disposal. (T0).
6.2. Range Clearance Operations. Range clearance includes the removal or disposal of all
ordnance, inert ordnance debris, Training Projectile (TP) ammunition, and other range debris
reasonably possible to detect (normally down to four inches in size).
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 55
6.2.1. WARNING: Range maintenance and clearance operations are prohibited when snow
covers the ground. However, if specifically authorized in the MAJCOM supplement,
activities such as clearance, target removal, or target replacement may be performed during
these periods. (T1).
6.2.2. Ordnance Removal and Disposal. EOD Personnel or UXO-Qualified Personnel will
inspect munitions, munitions components, and targets for the presence of explosive hazards
and will mark inspected items that are “safe to move”. (T1). Special attention should be
provided during target inspection to ensure UXO are not embedded or contained within
voids. “Safe to move” may be indicated by any readily distinguishable means that is
mutually agreeable to EOD and the ROA.
6.2.3. Personnel assisting in range clearances will only handle items that have been
inspected and marked “safe to move” by EOD Personnel or UXO-Qualified Personnel. (T1).
Personnel assisting will be supervised by either EOD Personnel or UXO-Qualified personnel
to ensure hazardous items are not inadvertently moved or removed. (T1).
6.2.4. Only EOD Personnel will perform explosive operations to detonate/destroy UXO and
energetic material. (T1). When a fully coordinated waiver or exemption has been approved
by AF/A3OJR, UXO-Qualified Personnel may perform limited explosives operations to
support specific range clearance objectives such as venting practice bombs or destroying
spotting charges. (Reference Attachment 1 for EOD Personnel and UXO-Qualified
Personnel definitions).
6.2.5. MPPEH Management. All munitions, munitions debris, and target debris removed
from a range is considered MPPEH and shall be managed IAW explosive safety standards.
(T0). Processing of MPPEH results in either Material Documented as an Explosive Hazard
(MDEH) or Material Documented as Safe (MDAS). Bases must institutionalize chain of
custody processes for MPPEH from collection to final disposition of the hazardous and safe
material. (T0). This is particularly necessary when two or more agencies (e.g., military and
contracted) are involved in the MPPEH process. Refer to AFI 21-201, Conventional
Munitions Management, for additional guidance on MPPEH management and disposition.
6.2.5.1. MPPEH processing (also known as “Range Residue Removal” [R3]) is normally
accomplished by UXO-qualified contractors where demilitarization complements the
inspection process to enable a more thorough examination.
6.2.5.2. Secure MPPEH awaiting processing/inspection in a properly sited residue
holding area (RHA). (T0). When non-EOD personnel handle and transport material
marked “safe to move” EOD Personnel or UXO-Qualified Personnel will supervise
handling/loading for consolidation at the RHA. (T1). Only EOD Personnel or UXO-
Qualified Personnel are authorized to handle material after placement in the RHA. (T1).
Ranges may accumulate MPPEH until a cost-effective processing quantity is reached, but
shall not delay processing in order to maximize the value of recyclable materials. (T0).
6.2.5.3. MPPEH must be double-inspected IAW DoDI 4140.62 to identify and remove
MDEH before it can be declared MDAS. (T0). To prevent co-mingling, once MDEH
and MDAS are identified and documented as such, they shall be segregated from one
another and from MPPEH awaiting inspection. (T0). Segregation may be accomplished
56 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
by any means that ensures physical separation and controlled access (e.g., bins, buildings,
or fenced compounds under lock and key).
6.2.5.4. Disposal of MDAS may be accomplished by any means consistent with DoDI
4140.62 and may be accomplished by the Defense Reutilization and Marketing Service
(DRMS) under a MOA or through direct commercial sales or contracts. Only properly
inspected and documented MDAS will be released to the public. (T0).
6.2.5.5. MPPEH disposal should not be viewed as a funds generating activity.
Management and disposal of MPPEH must consider safety first, and ensure compliance
with the RCRA Military Munitions Rule and (where applicable) hazardous waste
management requirements. Additionally, IAW DoDI 4715.4, Pollution Prevention, the
following categories are excluded from being sold through a qualified recycling program:
items that must be demilitarized; ships, planes or weapons that must undergo
demilitarization or mutilation prior to sale; Munitions List items or Strategic List items.
The proceeds from their sale SHALL NOT be returned to a qualified recycling program.
(T0).
6.3. Range Clearance Types and Requirements. On active ranges programmed for continued
use, clear the surface of all UXO, MPPEH, and inert debris as described below.
6.3.1. The following general rules apply to all clearance activities:
6.3.1.1. Mechanized gathering procedures coordinated with the associated EOD unit and
approved by the Air Force Safety Center (HQ AFSEC) may be used to clear sub-scale
practice munitions (e.g., BDU-33) as long as un-probed munitions are only handled by
EOD Personnel or UXO-Qualified Personnel.
6.3.1.2. Only perform subsurface UXO and subsurface MPPEH removal as required in
current or former Hazard Areas as required for construction, cable burial, etc. Report
subsurface MPPEH removal and range clearance separately. (T1).
6.3.1.3. Hazard Areas used specifically for live munitions containing extremely
hazardous fuzing (influence, random-delay, etc.) will be identified as "Extremely
Hazardous Contaminated Hazard Areas." Range clearance requirements of “Extremely
Hazardous Contaminated Hazard Areas” will be based on an Environmental, Safety, and
Occupational Health (ESOH) risk assessment, and if warranted, a waiver or exemption
request will be accomplished IAW paragraph 1.5 and staffed through the appropriate
USAF ESOH agencies.
6.3.1.4. Ranges adjacent to the land of another service that prohibits clearance activities
will be exempt from clearance requirements on those portions when the other service
provides written acknowledgement of the ramifications. These areas will be considered
“Extremely Hazardous Contaminated Impact Areas” and managed accordingly by the
ROA.
6.3.1.5. ROAs will receive authorization from adjacent facilities prior to
decontaminating/clearing adjacent impact areas. (T1). ROAs will document all access
denials for clearance activities and report occurrences to the parent MAJCOM and
AF/A3OJR. (T2).
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 57
6.3.2. Low-Angle Strafe Targets. If used for low-angle strafe by aircraft that fly past or over
the target within 500 feet of the target (slant range), hand-police daily if utilized and clear
after 15,000 scored rounds (or twelve use-days for non-scored targets). (T2).
6.3.3. Improved Conventional Munition (ICM) targets (e.g., Cluster Bomb Unit grids) are
normally cleared after accumulating a specific number of weapons. The maximum
accumulation amount for ICM targets will be specified in the Range CRP and for approval
by the MAJCOM with the concurrence of AF/A4C. After the maximum accumulation
amount is achieved, clear ICM targets to the radius where the debris density factor is less
than five items per acre and at least 500 feet from the target. (T1).
6.3.4. Range Clearance Requirements. (T1). Clear active ranges used for munitions
expenditures IAW the minimum requirements defined in the following sub-paragraphs.
Conduct clearances more frequently or to a greater distance as required to maintain targets or
realistic appearance, or where an uneven distribution of weapons results from restricted run-
in headings. Coordinate range clearance requirements with the associated EOD unit or
MAJCOM.
6.3.4.1. Clear target access roads and the area 50 feet on either side during clearance
operations or target maintenance activities (only those roads noted on installation maps
and those used for sole access to targets/arrays). Consider clearing to a greater side
distance to accommodate anticipated vehicle traffic (towed load, etc.), vehicle
characteristics (turn radius), and potential obstacles (road damage, UXO, etc.).
6.3.4.2. Semiannually or after 150 use-days (whichever comes later), clear the area
around each DPI associated with a high-use target to a radius of 150 feet. Note: this
criteria applies to individual DPIs (not multi-DPI target arrays) that receive a high
volume of munitions, where deferring clearance to the biennial interval would create a
significant ricochet hazard or significantly increase the range clearance work effort due to
the accumulation and/or density of UXO. ROAs may determine these high-use targets
based on range-specific conditions, in consultation with the MAJCOM.
6.3.4.3. Biennially, no later than two years since last accomplished, clear the area around
a target used for weapons expenditure as follows:
6.3.4.3.1. Clear targets used for practice, inert, pyrotechnic, illumination or smoke
munitions to either a) a radius of 300 feet, or b) the shorter radius where the debris
density factor is less than five items per acre.
6.3.4.3.2. Clear targets used for high explosive munitions (including White
Phosphorous) to either a) a radius of 500 feet, or b) the shorter radius where the
debris density factor is less than five items per acre.
6.3.4.4. Decennially, no later than 10 years since last accomplished, clear the area around
a target used for weapons expenditure to either a) a radius of 1,000 feet, or b) the shorter
radius where the density of debris items is less than five per acre. ROAs may elect to
clear all areas within 1,000 feet of targets every ten years and may do so incrementally
(e.g., 20% of the required area biennially for ten years).
6.4. Range Maintenance and Clearance Safety.
58 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
6.4.1. WARNING: Non-EOD Personnel will not move or attempt to move munitions or
targets unless they have been marked “safe to move” by EOD Personnel or UXO-Qualified
Personnel. (T0). This includes any object that appears to have been delivered on-range or
had weapons fired against it. The sole exceptions shall be for training gun ammunition
which has been expended on targets designated solely for that use, and expended Smokey
SAM missile simulators. (T0).
6.4.2. Safety Training Requirements.
6.4.2.1. ROAs will ensure all range personnel engaged in range maintenance and
clearance operations receive ground and explosive safety briefings IAW Attachment 5.
(T1).
6.4.2.2. ROAs will ensure EOD personnel receive orientation on ordnance expected to
be encountered, range vehicle operation, and emergency procedures. (T1).
6.4.2.3. The Lead EOD flight will ensure non-EOD personnel who are assisting in range
clearance operations are briefed on explosive safety hazards IAW AFMAN 91-201, the
markings used for live, practice, and inert ordnance found in T.O. 11A-1-53, General
Instruction for Ammunitions Color Coding, Identification of Empty and Inert Loaded
Ammunition Items and Components, and Assignment of Version Numbers to Training and
Dummy Ammunition Items, and the hazards they may encounter. (T1).
6.4.3. In addition to communications requirements specified in paragraph 4.7, each working
team must have a signaling device for use in the event an uninformed flight crew attempts to
use the range. (T3).
6.4.4. All contractor personnel must adhere to Occupational Safety & Health Administration
standards and/or DoD 4145.26-M, DoD Contractors’ Safety Manual for Ammunition and
Explosives, as applicable. (T0).
6.5. Range Operations during Range Maintenance and Clearance. Unless further restricted
by MAJCOM or local range supplements, adhere to the following restrictions during range
maintenance and clearance operations. (T2).
6.5.1. Only simulated weapons deliveries, IAW applicable directives, and training-mode
laser operations are authorized for the duration of range maintenance and range clearance
closures with the following exceptions. When the range is divided as described below all
maintenance and clearance activities must be complete before air-to-ground activities can
resume on that portion. All restrictions will be clearly identified in the range schedule and
reinforced by range NOTAMS.
6.5.1.1. Class A Service Operations. Range maintenance and clearance operations can
be conducted on one side of a dual Class A service range (except behind strafe targets)
while the RCO is controlling aircrew training missions on the other side of the range.
6.5.1.2. Class B and C Service Operations. Ranges providing Class B and C service are
normally closed during maintenance and clearance operations, but if the range is of
sufficient size the ROA may authorize continued operations on portions of the range (and
adjacent ranges) with the approval of the ground party team chief. If approved, the ROA
will brief aircrews concerning the location of ground personnel and emphasize the
absolute need for positive target identification.
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 59
6.5.2. Over Flight Procedures. Over flight is not authorized without the concurrence of the
ground party and RCO/ROO approval over areas or portions of ranges during maintenance
and clearance operations in conjunction with the following restrictions. This ensures the
protection of ground personnel and prevents aircraft damage by fragments from explosives
operations. For the purpose of this instruction, the over flight restrictions define a minimum
distance in any direction, i.e., a “safety bubble.” Strict adherence to the procedures outlined
below is mandatory.
6.5.2.1. When range maintenance or clearance personnel are present on the range and
explosives operations are not planned, aircraft will remain above 3,000’ AGL unless a
lower altitude and distance is specifically approved by the ground party and RCO/ROO.
6.5.2.2. When explosives operations are planned, aircraft will remain at or above 10,000’
AGL (accounts for potential rogue fragments IAW AFMAN 91-201).
6.5.2.3. Do not release chaff and flares over range maintenance and clearance operations.
6.5.2.4. When no personnel are on the range aircraft operations may proceed with no
additional altitude restrictions.
60 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
Chapter 7
TEST AND TRAINING USE OF DEPLETED URANIUM
7.1. Policy and Procedures for Use of Depleted Uranium. This instruction establishes policy
and procedures for the use of Depleted Uranium (DU) on AF operational ranges. Test and
training operations involving DU will be IAW this instruction, AFI 40-201, and the applicable
USAF Radioactive Material Permit issued under the authority of USAF Master Materials
License by the Air Force Medical Support Agency’s (AFMSA) Radioisotope Committee (RIC).
7.2. Responsibilities.
7.2.1. HQ USAF. The Air Staff provides policy and operational oversight of the use of DU.
Approval authority for the use of DU rests with AF/A3.
7.2.2. Air Force Medical Support Agency (AFMSA). The RIC (AFMSA/SG3PB) provides
regulatory oversight of all radioactive material used in the Air Force, other than those
classified as falling under Section 91(b) of the Atomic Energy Act (AEA) [see 42 U.S.C. §
2121].
7.2.3. Unit Commanders.
7.2.3.1. Ensure that only authorized DU activities are conducted.
7.2.3.2. Establish programs to ensure activities are accomplished safely and in
compliance with requirements.
7.2.3.3. Identify resources needed to comply with this instruction.
7.2.3.4. Appoint a Radiation Safety Officer with the authorities and responsibilities
identified in AFI 40-201. (Tiering IAW cited publication).
7.2.4. Personnel Using or Handling Depleted Uranium.
7.2.4.1. Comply with radiation safety procedures outlined in the license or permit
authorizing the storage or use of DU, the referenced directives, local operating
instructions or directives, and verbal instructions of their Radiation Safety Officer and
supervisor.
7.2.4.2. Halt any imminent danger situation immediately, place the operation in a safe
configuration, and inform their Radiation Safety Officer or supervisor of unsafe or non-
compliant radiological conditions and incidents or accidents involving DU.
7.3. Authorized Locations. The use of DU is restricted to sole use Impact Areas permitted by
the RIC. (T0). Except for Combat Mix, all other munitions, live or inert, practice or full-scale,
are prohibited from use in a DU Impact Area. (T0). Testing of 30 mm Armor Piercing
Incendiary (API) DU munitions and reliability certification flight tests are limited to the
following locations:
7.3.1. 30 mm API DU Testing and Training.
7.3.1.1. Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, Area C-64. Use to conduct life cycle testing of
30mm API (PGU-14/B) ammunition, rounds are fired into an enclosed gun butt. Use
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 61
only approved areas to handle, store, machine, and test R&D items within an enclosed
test chamber. (T1).
7.3.1.2. Nevada Test and Training Range, Nevada, Target 63-10. Use to conduct Test
and Evaluation in order to verify ballistics, Operational Flight Program (OFP) software
changes, Low Altitude Safety and Targeting Enhancement (LASTE) upgrades, and to
conduct USAF Weapons School instructor pilot training and tactical employment
evaluation using Combat Mix. (T1).
7.3.2. Stockpile Surveillance Flight Tests (AF-National Nuclear Security Administration
(NNSA) Joint Flight Tests).
7.3.2.1. NNSA constructs Joint Test Assemblies (JTA) for Joint Flight Tests based on
NNSA and AF test requirements. These JTAs may contain DU.
7.3.2.2. As stated in the AF-NNSA MOA covering joint test and assessment activities, it
is the joint policy of NNSA and the AF to recover lost JTAs whenever possible and
consistent with US policy and law.
7.3.2.3. AF-NNSA Joint Flight Tests are normally conducted at Utah Test & Training
Range (UTTR), Eglin Range, NNSA’s test range located within Tonopah Test Range,
and Army’s Kwajalein Atoll (Reagan Test Site).
7.3.2.3.1. Use of any other AF range for employment of Joint Flight Test weapons
containing DU requires advance coordination with the range’s parent MAJCOM,
AF/A3OJR, and AF/TE. (T-1).
7.3.2.3.2. Joint Flight Test activities at Vandenberg AFB, Nellis AFB, Eglin AFB,
Whiteman AFB, Barksdale AFB, and Minot AFB are limited to carrier/weapon
interface and carrier launch only. (T-1).
7.3.2.4. AF ranges supporting Joint Flight Tests will work with the AF RIC to determine
whether the impact area requires a radioactive material permit/license, and will obtain the
permit/license where required. (T-1).
7.3.2.5. Use of DU for stockpile surveillance flight tests is authorized under AF auspices
by Section 91(b) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 and falls under the jurisdiction of
AFSEC/SEW.
7.4. Disposal/Decommission Procedures.
7.4.1. Disposal of Expended DU Penetrators. Expended DU penetrators and visible
fragments will be collected, packaged, and disposed of in coordination with the Installation
Radiation Safety Officer and the Air Force RIC. (T0). Before commencing clearance
actions, an EOD team will sweep the Impact Area and eliminate any UXO or explosive
hazards. (T1). Annually, authorized personnel will manually remove visible DU rounds and
fragments, and package them for disposal (see paragraph 7.4.1.2).
7.4.1.1. Authorized Personnel. Personnel trained in DU hazards and wearing the
appropriate personal protective equipment, as determined by a qualified health physicist
and the Installation Radiation Safety Officer, will remove penetrators and fragments.
(T1).
62 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
7.4.1.2. Disposal Packing Requirements. Penetrators and fragments will be packaged for
disposal or recycling IAW instructions provided by AFRMWO. Prepare requests for
disposal or recycling IAW AFI 40-201 and coordinate with the Installation Radiation
Safety Officer. (T0).
7.4.1.3. Contaminated Targets. Vehicles and tanks that are no longer intended to be used
as targets or are so damaged from use that they are in need of replacement will be
identified and decontaminated IAW AFI 40-201 or have arrangements made for proper
disposal or recycling. (T1).
7.4.2. Decommission Plan. IAW AFI 40-201, prior to expending DU at any authorized
location, units will develop a decommissioning plan identifying costs to remediate DU
contamination at the site based on current technology. Review and update the
decommissioning plan biennially and provide a copy of the plan to the RIC. (T0).
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 63
Chapter 8
NATURAL INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGEMENT AND ENCROACHMENT
PREVENTION
8.1. Range Natural Infrastructure Management & Encroachment Prevention. In order to
ensure mission readiness, adequate natural infrastructure (air, land, and water) and frequency
spectrum are needed to test, train, and perform the Air Force’s varied missions at its ranges.
These resources can be degraded or denied in some locations due to environmental issues or
encroachment. Encroachment (defined in AFI 90-2001) comes in many forms, but often results
in diminished operations or significant workarounds, inconveniences, and additional costs of
doing business. Therefore, it is important to maintain natural infrastructure and protect against
encroachment wherever possible to meet operational requirements.
8.1.1. In order to document and track efforts to conserve and restore the natural
infrastructure to ensure operational capability, each range in conjunction with a multi-
disciplinary team, including wing CE (to include EOD), safety, legal, etc., shall develop and
maintain a CRP as discussed in paragraph 3.1.11.
8.1.2. The CRP will document encroachment issues, both internally and externally, for
ranges and associated airspace describing impacts on the mission. (T3). Internal factors
include, but are not limited to, wetlands, threatened and endangered (T/E) species, hazardous
waste sites, military frequency spectrum competition, and UXO. External factors include,
but are not limited to, incompatible land use zoning, frequency spectrum restrictions,
physical obstructions and renewable energy projects, and local and regional environmental
constraints. The ROA will work with the installation subject matter experts, the surrounding
federal, state, and local governments, commercial entities and MAJCOM offices to minimize
external and internal encroachments. (T2).
8.1.3. The Air Force Encroachment Management Program leverages foundational programs
to address installation encroachment challenges. Operational ranges are a component of the
Installation Complex/Mission Footprint. In addition to the requirement to address
encroachment within the CRP, ROAs will, IAW AFI 90-2001:
8.1.3.1. Participate on the Installation Encroachment Management Team. (Tiering IAW
cited publication).
8.1.3.2. Ensure range-related encroachment issues are captured within the Installation
Complex Encroachment Management Action Plan (ICEMAP). (Tiering IAW cited
publication).
8.1.4. Protection of human health, conservation of wetlands and endangered species, and
conservation of cultural resources are essential range management activities. Compliance
activities and attendant metrics, however, do not provide an adequate measure of program
management effectiveness absent a clear linkage to operational requirements. As stated in
DoDD 3200.15, Sustaining Access to the Live Training and Test Domain, it is DoD policy to
sustain the resiliency and capacity of areas used for training and test. This requires, among
other things, integration of mission requirements with sound resource management as well as
natural and cultural principles.
64 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
8.2. Integrated Natural and Cultural Resources Program.
8.2.1. Air Force ranges will conserve natural and cultural resources pursuant to the Sikes
Act, 16 U.S.C. § 670 et seq; Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq; National
Historic Preservation Act, 54 U.S.C. § 300101 et seq. (T0).
8.2.1.1. The natural resources program will be implemented by an approved INRMP,
which will be written IAW AFI 32-7064. (Tiering IAW cited publication). The
INRMP is the sole tool for implementing the military natural resources program.
8.2.1.2. The cultural resources program will be implemented by an approved ICRMP,
which will be written IAW AFI 32-7065, Cultural Resources Management Program.
(Tiering IAW cited publication). The ICRMP is the sole tool for implementing the
military cultural resources program.
8.2.2. Each INRMP and ICRMP will be written to support the current and future known
mission requirements identified in the CRP and will be amended as mission requirements
change significantly.
8.3. Environmental Compliance, Conservation, and Pollution Prevention.
8.3.1. Environmental Compliance. Air Force ranges will conduct their activities according
to national environmental policy and meet environmental compliance guidelines set forth in
AF and DoD instructions, including (but not limited to) AFI 32-7001, Environmental
Management, AFI 32-7047, Environmental Compliance Tracking and Reporting, and DoDI
4715.6, Environmental Compliance. The Air Force will comply with applicable Federal,
State, and local environmental laws and standards. Air Force activities in foreign countries
will comply with the DoD Final Governing Standards, or in their absence, the environmental
criteria of the DoD Overseas Environmental Baseline Guidance Document.
8.3.2. Conservation and Pollution Prevention. The Air Force will conserve natural and
cultural resources through effective environmental planning. The Air Force will prevent
future pollution by reducing use of hazardous materials and releases of pollutants into the
environment through source reduction, recycling, and hazardous material substitutions.
Commanders at all levels as well as all Air Force employees are responsible for full
compliance with national and Air Force environmental policy.
8.3.3. Military Munitions Rule (MMR). The regulations governing the cradle-to-grave
management of hazardous waste are codified in Title 40 CFR Parts 260-270. The portion of
those regulations that determine when military munitions become solid waste and provide
standards for their management as hazardous waste are codified in Title 40 CFR , Part 266,
Subpart M, “Military Munitions” (40 CFR §§ 266.200 -- 266.206). MAJCOMs/ROAs will
comply with the standards established in the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA)
MMR to meet EPA regulatory requirements on active and inactive ranges. (T0). Ensure the
host CE unit/environmental function is involved in the process. (T3).
8.3.4. Material Potentially Presenting an Explosive Hazard (MPPEH). MAJCOMs/ROAs
will manage active and inactive ranges under their control to maintain long-term viability of
DoD ranges while protecting human health and the environment and to minimize future
clearance costs. (T1). Ranges and munitions should be designed to minimize potential
explosive hazards and harmful environmental impacts and to promote resource recovery and
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 65
recycling. Each MAJCOM/ROA will comply with DoDI 4140.62, DoDD 4715.11, and
DoDD 4715.12. (T0).
8.4. Programming Guidance. Eligible environmental requirements shall be identified for
funding in ACES (or successor system). The ranges shall project environmental requirements in
Program Objective Memorandum (POM) submissions. AFCEC Installation Support Teams can
assist in identifying projects eligible for environmental funding versus environmentally related
operational requirements that must be funded with the ranges operations and maintenance funds.
Projects will be programmed IAW AFI 32-7001 or AFI 32-7020, The Environmental Restoration
Program, as appropriate. (T1).
8.5. Environmental Inventory. It is critical for the Air Force Operational Range
Environmental Program to have an accurate inventory of environmental attributes of operational
ranges. This inventory supports informed and accurate environmental resource decisions to
sustain our operational ranges into the future. Each range shall respond to annual data calls and
provide the requested information in coordination with the host CE squadron/environmental
office. (T2).
8.6. Operational Range Assessment Program. Ranges shall work with the host CE
squadron/environmental shop to conduct operational range munitions constituent migration
assessments IAW DoDD 4715.11, DoDD 4715.12, DoDI 4715.14, Operational Range
Assessments. (T0). Note: administration of the AF Operational Range Assessment Program is
centralized at AFCEC.
TOD D. WOLTERS, Lt Gen, USAF
Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations
66 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
Attachment 1
GLOSSARY OF REFERENCES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION
REFERENCES
Legislative and Regulatory
10 United States Code § 172, Ammunition Storage Board
10 United States Code § 2701, Environmental Restoration Program
16 United States Code § 670 et seq., Sikes Act
16 United States Code § 1531 et seq, Endangered Species Act
42 United States Code § 2121 et seq., Legislation and Federal Regulations
42 United States Code §§ 4321–4347, National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
42 United States Code §§ 6901-6992, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
42 United States Code § 9604, Response Authorities
43 United States Code § 155 et seq. Withdrawal, Reservation, or Restriction of Public Lands
for Defense Purposes
54 United States Code § 300101 et seq., National Historic Preservation Act
32 CFR Part 989, Environmental Impact Analysis Process (EIAP)
40 CFR Part 266, Subpart M, Military Munitions
DoD and US Governmental Publications
JP 1-02, Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, 8 November 2010
JP 3-09.3, Close Air Support, 25 November 2014
MIL-HDBK-828B, Range Laser Safety, 5 May 2011
DoDI 1100.22, Policy and Procedures for Determining Workforce Mix, 12 April 2010
DoDI 1322.27, DoD Urban Training Facilities, 13 April 2007
DoDI 1322.28, Realistic Military Training (RMT) Off Federal Real Property, 18 March 2013
DoDI 3100.11, Illumination of Objects in Space by Lasers, 31 March 2000
DoDD 3200.11, Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB), 27 December 2007
DoDD 3200.15, Sustaining Access to the Live Training and Test Domain, 18 December 2013
DoDI 3200.16, Operational Range Clearance, 13 June 2005
DoDI 3200.18, Management and Operation of the Major Range and Test Facility Base
(MRTFB), 1 February 2010.
CJCSM 3212.02D, Performing Electronic Attack in the United States and Canada for Tests,
Training and Exercises, 31 December 2013
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 67
CJCSM 3212.03A, Performing Tests, Training, and Exercises Impacting the Global Positioning
System (GPS), 8 November 2013
CJCSI 3225.01, Illumination of Objects in Space by Lasers, 1 August 2008
DoDI 4140.62, Material Potentially Presenting an Explosive Hazard (MPPEH), 25 November
2008
DoD 4145.26-M, DoD Contractors’ Safety Manual for Ammunition and Explosives, 13 March
2008
DoD 4160.21-M, Defense Materiel Disposition Manual, 18 August 1997
DoD 4160.28-M, Volumes 1-3, Defense Demilitarization, 7 June 2011
DoDI 4715.4, Pollution Prevention, 18 June 1996
DoDI 4715.6, Environmental Compliance, 24 April 1996
DoDD 4715.11, Environmental and Explosives Safety Management on Operational Ranges
Within the United States, 10 May 2004
DoDD 4715.12, Environmental and Explosives Safety Management on Operational Ranges
Outside the United States, 12 July 2004
DoDI 4715.14, Operational Range Assessments, 30 November 2005
DoDI 6055.07, Mishap Notification, Investigation, Reporting, and Recordkeeping, 6 June 2011
DoDD 6055.9E, Explosives Safety Management and the DoD Explosives Safety Board, 19
August 2005
DoD 6055.09-M, DoD Ammunition and Explosives Safety Standards, 29 February 2008
DoDI 6055.11, Protecting Personnel from Electromagnetic Fields, 19 August 2009
DoDI 6055.15, DoD Laser Protection Program, 4 May 2007
FAA Order 7400.2K, Chapter 29, Outdoor Laser Operations, 3 April 2014
Executive Order 12372, Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs, 14 July 1982
JFCC Space/J0CC Memorandum, Satellite Protection Guidance for the Laser Clearinghouse,
28 February 2012
Air Force Publications
AFTTP 3-2.6(I), JFIRE Multi-Service Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures for the Joint
Application of Firepower, November 2012
AFI 10-252, Defense Readiness Reporting System, 9 August 2012
AFI 11-202, Volume 3, General Flight Rules, 7 November 2014
AFI 11-214, Air Operations Rules and Procedures, 14 August 2012
AFI 11-502V3, Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations, 26 April 2012
68 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
T.O. 11A-1-53, General Instruction for Ammunitions Color Coding, Identification of Empty and
Inert Loaded Ammunition Items and Components, and Assignment of Version Numbers to
Training and Dummy Ammunition Items
AFI 13-112, Volume 1, Joint Terminal Attack Controller (JTAC) Training Program, 15
February 2008
AFPD 13-2, Air Traffic, Airfield, Airspace, and Range Management, 7 August 2007
AFI 13-201, Airspace Management, 21 August 2012
AFMAN 16-101, International Affairs and Security Assistance Management, 15 February 2011
AFI 21-101, Aircraft and Equipment Maintenance Management, 26 July 2010
AFI 21-103, Equipment Inventory, Status and Utilization Reporting, 26 January 2012
AFI 21-118, Improving Air and Space Equipment Reliability and Maintainability, 2 October
2003
AFI 21-201, Conventional Munitions Management, 9 April 2014
AFI 25-201, Intra-Service, Intra-Agency, and Inter-Agency Support Agreements Procedures, 18
October 2013
AFI 31-101, Integrated Defense (FOUO), 8 October 2009
AFI 32-3001, Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Program, 20 November 2014
AFI 32-7001, Environmental Management, 4 November 2011
AFI 32-7020, The Environmental Restoration Program, 7 November 2014
AFI 32-7047, Environmental Compliance, Release, and Inspection Reporting, 22 January 2015
AFI 32-7062, Comprehensive Planning, 27 June 2013
AFI 32-7064, Integrated Natural Resources Management, 18 November 2014
AFI 32-7065, Cultural Resources Management Program, 19 November 2014
AFI 32-7066, Environmental Baseline Surveys in Real Estate Transactions, 26 January 2015
AFI 32-9001, Acquisition of Real Property, 27 July 1994
AFI 32-9004, Disposal of Real Property, 21 July 1994
AFI 32-10112, Installation Geospatial Information and Services (Installation GI&S), 19 October
2007
AFI 33-360, Publications and Forms Management, 25 September 2013
AFI 33-580, Spectrum Management, 17 January 2013
AFMAN 33-363, Management of Records, 1 March 2008
AFI 36-2226, Combat Arms Program, 24 February 2009
AFI 38-101, Air Force Organization, 25 September 2013
AFI 40-201, Managing Radioactive Materials in the US Air Force, 17 September 2014
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 69
AFI 48-109, Electromagnetic Field Radiation (EMFR) Occupational and Environmental Health
Program, 1 August 2014
AFI 48-139, Laser and Optical Radiation Protection Program, 30 September 2014
AFI 63-101/20-101, Integrated Life Cycle Management, 7 March 2013
AFI 63-108, Acquisition of Services, 21 May 2013
AFI 65-601V1, Budget Guidance and Procedures, 16 August 2012
AFPD 90-20, Encroachment Management Program, 12 April 2012
AFI 90-2001, Encroachment Management, 3 September 2014
AFI 90-2002, Air Force Interactions with Federally-Recognized Tribes, 19 November 2014
AFI 90-802, Risk Management, 11 February 2013
AFPAM 90-803, Risk Management (RM) Guidelines and Tools, 11 February 2013
AFMAN 91-201, Explosives Safety Standards, 12 January 2011
AFI 91-202, The US Air Force Mishap Prevention Program, 5 August 2011
AFI 91-203, Air Force Consolidated Occupational Safety Instruction, 15 June 2012
AFI 91-204, Safety Investigations and Reports, 12 February 2014
AFI 91-401, Directed Energy Weapons Safety, 5 September 2013
AFPD 99-1, Test and Evaluation, 3 June 2014
AFI 99-103, Capabilities Based Test and Evaluation, 16 October 2013
AFI 99-106, Joint Test and Evaluation Program, 26 August 2009
AFI 99-108, Programming and Reporting Aerial Target and Missile Expenditures in Test and
Evaluation, 1 March 2007
AFI 99-109, Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB) Test and Evaluation Resource
Planning, 22 January 2014
AFI 99-120, Forecasting and Programming Munitions Telemetry and Flight Termination
Systems, 1 March 2007
Other Publications
ANSI Z136.1, Safe Use of Lasers
ANSI Z136.6, Safe Use of Lasers Outdoors
Prescribed Forms
None
Adopted Forms
AF Form 847, Recommendation for Change of Publication
AF Form 1067, Modification Proposal
DD Form 1144, Support Agreement
70 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
AAA—Anti-Aircraft Artillery
ABM—Air Battle Manager
ACC—Air Combat Command
ACES—Automated Civil Engineers System
ACTS—Air Combat Training Systems
ADVON—Advanced Echelon
AEA—Atomic Energy Act
AETC—Air Education and Training Command
AFCEC—Air Force Civil Engineer Center
AFI—Air Force Instruction
AFMAN—Air Force Manual
AFMC—Air Force Materiel Command
AFMSA—Air Force Medical Support Agency
AFOTEC—Air Force Operational Test and Evaluation Center
AFPD—Air Force Policy Directive
AFRC—Air Force Reserve Command
AFREP—Air Force Representative
AFRL—Air Force Research Laboratory
AFRMWO—Air Force Radioactive and Mixed Waste Office
AFROC—Air Force Requirements Oversight Council
AFSEC—Air Force Safety Center
AFSOC—Air Force Special Operations Command
AFTC—Air Force Test Center
AFTTIC—Air Force Test and Training Infrastructure Council
AHAS—Avian Hazard Advisory System
AGL—Above Ground Level
AM—Amplitude Modulation
AMC—Air Mobility Command
ANG—Air National Guard
API—Armor Piercing Incendiary
ATC—Air Traffic Control
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 71
ATCAA—Air Traffic Control Assigned Airspace
AWACS—Airborne Warning and Control System
AWOS—Automated Weather Observing System
BLM—Bureau of Land Management
CAF—Combat Air Forces
CAS—Close Air Support
CDA—Collateral Damage Assessment
CDD—Capability Development Document
CE—Civil Engineer
CFA—Controlled Firing Area
CFR—Code of Federal Regulations
CIP—Common Installation Picture
CJCSI—Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Instruction
CJCSM—Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Manual
COMAFFOR—Commander, Air Force Forces
CPD—Capability Production Document
CRP—Comprehensive Range Plan
CSE—Center Scheduling Enterprise
CTEIP—Central Test and Evaluation Investment Program
DDESB—DoD Explosives Safety Board
DEW—Directed Energy Weapon
DEWDZ—Directed Energy Weapon Danger Zone
DEWSO—Directed Energy Weapons Safety Officer
DPI—Desired Point(s) of Impact
DOC—Designed Operational Capability
DoD—Department of Defense
DoDD—Department of Defense Directive
DoDI—Department of Defense Instruction
DRMO—Defense Reutilization and Marketing Office
DRMS—Defense Reutilization and Marketing Service
DT&E—Developmental Test and Evaluation
DU—Depleted Uranium
72 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
DZ—Drop Zone
EA—Electronic Attack
EBS—Environmental Baseline Survey
EFX—Expeditionary Force Experiments
EIAP—Environmental Impact Analysis Process
EOD—Explosive Ordnance Disposal
EODIMS—Explosive Ordnance Disposal Information Management System
EPA—Environmental Protection Agency
EPF—Environmental Planning Function
ERP—Enterprise Range Plan
EWR—Electronic Warfare Range
EWS—Electronic Warfare Site
ESOH—Environmental, Safety, and Occupational Health
ETAC—Enlisted Terminal Attack Controller
EW—Electronic Warfare
FAA—Federal Aviation Administration
FAC(A)—Forward Air Controller (Airborne)
FAR—Federal Acquisition Regulation
FDE—Force Development Evaluation
FLIP—Flight Information Publication
FLPMA—Federal Land Policy and Management Act
FM—Frequency Modulation
FMS—Foreign Military Sales
FTS—Flight Termination System
FYDP—Future Years Defense Program
GCI—Ground-Controlled Interception
GFE—Government Furnished Equipment
GIO—Geospatial Integration Office
GIS—Geographic Information System
GPS—Global Positioning System
HTSA—Host-Tenant Support Agreement
I&M—Improvement and Modernization
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 73
IADS—Integrated Air Defense System
IAW—In Accordance With
ICD—Initial Capabilities Document
I-CDS—Improved Container Delivery System
ICEMAP—Installation Complex Encroachment Management Action Plan
ICM—Improved Conventional Munition
ICRMP—Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan
IFR—Instrument Flight Rules
GI&S—Geospatial Information & Services
IMT—Information Management Tool
INRMP—Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan
IR—IFR Route
ISM—Installation Spectrum Manager
ISSA—Inter-Service Support Agreement
JAWSS—Joint Advanced Weapon Scoring System
JPARC—Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex
JT&E—Joint Test and Evaluation
JTA—Joint Test Assembly
JTAC—Joint Terminal Attack Controller
KIAS—Knots Indicated Airspeed
LASTE—Low Altitude Safety and Targeting Enhancement
LCH—Laser Clearinghouse
LMR—Land Mobile Radio
LOA—Letter of Agreement
LSDZ—Laser Surface Danger Zone
LSO—Laser Safety Officer
LVC—Live, Virtual, and Constructive
LZ—Landing Zone
MAF—Mobility Air Forces
MAJCOM—Major Command
MDAS—Material Documented as Safe
MDEH—Material Documented as an Explosive Hazard
74 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
MDS—Mission Design Series
MMR—Military Munitions Rule
MMRP—Military Munitions Response Program
MOA—Military Operations Area (airspace context), or Memorandum of Agreement (support
agreement context)
MOU—Memorandum of Understanding
MPE—Maximum Permissible Exposure
MPPEH—Material Potentially Presenting an Explosive Hazard
MRP—MAJCOM Range Plan
MRTFB—Major Range and Test Facility Base
MSD—Minimum Safe Distance
MSL—Mean Sea Level
MTR—Military Training Route
MWS—Major Weapons System
NAS—National Airspace System
NCO—Non-Commissioned Officer
NEPA—National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
NM—Nautical Mile
NNSA—National Nuclear Security Administration
NOHD—Nominal Ocular Hazard Distance
NOTAM—Notice to Airmen
NRC—Nuclear Regulatory Commission
NTTR—Nevada Test and Training Range
NVDs—Night Vision Devices
O&M—Operations and Maintenance
OFP—Operational Flight Program
OP—Observation Post
OPR—Office of Primary Responsibility
OSD—Office of the Secretary of Defense
OT&E—Operational Test and Evaluation
PACAF—Pacific Air Forces
PADS—MP—Precision Airdrop System-Mission Planner
PARC—Pacific Alaska Range Complex
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 75
PDF—Probability Distribution Function
PE—Program Element
PEM—Program Element Monitor
PIWG—Product Improvement Working Group
POM—Program Objective Memorandum
PTR—Primary Training Range
QA—Quality Assurance
QAE—Quality Assurance Evaluator
QASP—Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan
QDR—Quadrennial Defense Review
R&D—Research and Development
R&M—Reliability and Maintainability
R3—Range Residue Removal
RAMPOD—Reliability, Availability, Maintainability Logistics Engineering Support System for
Pods
RAP—Ready Aircrew Program
RCO—Range Control Officer
RCRA—Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
RDS—Records Disposition Schedule
RF—Radio Frequency
RIC—Radioisotope Committee
RM—Risk Management
ROA—Range Operating Authority
ROO—Range Operations Officer
RSO—Range Safety Officer
RST—Range Support Tasking
RTO—Range Training Officer
RTRB—Realistic Training Review Board
SAE—Service Acquisition Executive
SAF—Secretary of the Air Force
SAM—Surface-to-Air Missile
SDZ—Surface Danger Zone
SECDEF—Secretary of Defense
76 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
SPO—Systems Program Office
SUA—Special Use Airspace
SUAS—Small Unmanned Aerial System
T/E—Threatened and Endangered
TACO—Test Area Control Officer
TACP—Tactical Air Control Party
TEMP—Test and Evaluation Master Plans
TIPP—Test Investment Planning and Programming
T.O.—Technical Order
TP—Target Practice
TRB—Training Review Board
TRMC—Test Resource Management Center
TSPI—Time-Space-Position-Information
TTP—Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures
T/TSNS—Test/Training Space Needs Statement
UAS—Unmanned Aerial System
UHF—Ultra-High Frequency
USAF—United States Air Force
USAFE—United States Air Forces in Europe
USAFWS—United States Air Force Weapons School
U.S.C.—United States Code
USAF—United States Air Force
USCG—United States Coast Guard
UTFRG—Urban Training Facilities Review Group
UTTR—Utah Test and Training Range
UXO—Unexploded Ordnance
VCO—Vehicle Control Officer
VFR—Visual Flight Rules
VHF—Very-High Frequency
VR—VFR Route
WDZ—Weapon Danger Zone
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 77
TERMS
Note: The purpose of this glossary is to help the reader understand the terms used in this
publication. It does not encompass all pertinent terms. Joint Publication 1—02, DoD
Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms, and AFDD 1-2, Air Force Glossary, contain
standardized terms and definitions for DoD and USAF use.
Air Combat Training Systems (ACTS)—A general term referring to aircraft instrumentation
pods, ground receiving equipment, and interface/display equipment used for live monitoring,
capture, and replay/debrief of training missions.
Air Force Representative (AFREP)—An Air Force officer stationed at HQ FAA or a regional
office and accredited by AF/A3 to provide USAF representation to FAA on airspace/range and
air traffic control matters.
Alert Area—Airspace designated to inform pilots of a high level of training activity or any
unusual activity where prior knowledge would significantly enhance air safety. There are no
restrictions placed on non-participating IFR or VFR aircraft.
Armor Piercing Incendiary (API)—A 30mm round consisting of a 0.66 pound extruded DU
penetrator, alloyed with 0.75 weight percent titanium, encased in a 0.8 mm-thick aluminum shell
and windscreen.
Byproduct Material—Radioactive material (except Source or Special Nuclear Material) yielded
in or made radioactive by exposure to radiation, incident to the process of producing or using
Source or Special Nuclear Material.
Certificate of Clearance—An official document that certifies removal of all dangerous and
explosive materials reasonably possible to detect. The certificate is dated, and a range clearance
report is attached. The cleared areas are identified in red crosshatch on a map, and annotated in
the map legend.
Common Installation Picture—The standard USAF geospatial data set that depicts facilities
and physical features on an installation. The CIP is comprised of georeferenced vector layers in a
digital format with related attribute information and a georeferenced imagery layer See AFI 32-
10112 for additional information.
Comprehensive Range Planning—An iterative process that examines current and projected
operational needs to identify the best use for limited range development resources and the largest
threats to the military value of ranges and airspace.
Comprehensive Range Plan (CRP)—The range commander’s plan, approved by the
MAJCOM, that baselines the range, establishes the Vision with supporting goals and develops
the strategy for attaining the vision through objectives and an implementation approach.
Controlled Firing Area (CFA)—An area in which ordnance firing is conducted under
controlled conditions so as to eliminate hazards to non-participating aircraft, and to ensure the
safety of persons and property on the ground. Aeronautical charts do not depict CFAs.
Controlling Agency—Air Traffic Control (ATC) facility responsible for providing airborne
control services in and around a designated airspace. With respect to a restricted area, the using
agency may authorize transit through or flight within the restricted area according to a joint-use
agreement.
78 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
DoD Explosives Safety Board (DDESB)—DoD organization charged with promulgation of
ammunition and explosives safety policy and standards, and with reporting on effectiveness of
the implementation of such policy and standards IAW DoDD 6055.9.
Depleted Uranium (DU)—DU is the resultant “waste” of the Uranium-235 enrichment process.
The radioisotope ratio in DU is 0.4% Uranium-235 (maximum) and 99.6% Uranium-238. DU is
a dense, heavy metal and has two properties that make it ideal for military applications: extreme
density and the tendency to ignite on impact (especially with steel).
Directed Energy Weapon (DEW)—A weapon system using directed energy primarily as a
direct means to deny, disrupt, degrade (damage), or destroy enemy equipment, facilities, or
personnel.
Electronic Warfare Range (EWR)—This term has traditionally taken on a narrow definition of
referring only to those ranges with an Electronic Warfare (EW) capability that is associated with
and located on a range capable of receiving surface fires and actual ordnance delivery. However,
with the proliferation of EW capabilities across all the Air Force ranges, the term is now
generally understood to refer to any range with an EW capability.
Electronic Warfare Site (EWS)—An EWS is a specific type of Electronic Warfare (EW)
training area which is not located within the boundaries of another range. Typically, the land
required for an EWS is minimal and they do not support actual ordnance delivery. They can be
located at any location with proper security and are usually located under or near a Military
Training Route (MTR) or Military Operations Area (MOA). In previous versions of this
publication, this type of training area was referred to as an Electronic Scoring Site (ESS), despite
the fact that many of these sites did not have scoring capability.
Emitter/Simulator—Generic terms used to describe threat equipment operated at Electronic
Warfare Ranges (EWR) and Electronic Warfare Sites (EWS). However, Air Combat Command
operates a variety of equipment including, but not limited to, Emitter only systems, Emitter-
Receiver-Processors, and replica type systems. Carefully compare the similarities and features
of different systems and consider operational requirements. Surface-to-Air Missile (SAM) and
Anti-Aircraft Artillery (AAA) simulators include all manned and unmanned threat emitters.
Environmental Impact Analysis Process (EIAP)—The formal Air Force process for
implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Council on Environmental
Quality’s NEPA Regulations, used to support Air Force decision making and assess
environmental impacts resulting from a proposed action and its reasonable alternatives.
Environmental Planning Function (EPF)—At every level of command, the EPF is a key
participant responsible for the EIAP. At the request of the proponent, the EPF manages the
preparation of environmental documents and assists the proponent in obtaining review of
environmental documents.
Essential Personnel—Those personnel on a range, not required for ordnance employment, that
participate and provide essential support for the range test, training or evaluation mission.
Examples include maneuver elements, opposition forces, instructors, evaluators, range personnel
conducting maintenance, etc.
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 79
Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD)—The detection, identification, on-site evaluation,
rendering safe, recovery, and final disposal of unexploded explosive ordnance. It may also
include explosive ordnance that has become hazardous by damage or deterioration.
EOD Personnel/Technician—Military personnel who have graduated from the Naval School,
Explosive Ordnance Disposal; are assigned to a military unit with a Service-defined EOD
mission; and meet Service and assigned unit requirements to perform EOD duties. EOD
Personnel have received specialized training to address explosive and chemical agent hazards
during both peacetime and wartime. EOD Personnel are trained and equipped to perform Render
Safe Procedures (RSP) on nuclear, biological, chemical, and conventional munitions, and on
improvised explosive devices. (DoD Definition)
Government Controlled—Control exercised by any federal government agency.
Hazard Area—The composite area of all Weapon Danger Zones (WDZs), Surface Danger
Zones (SDZs), Laser Surface Danger Zones (LSDZs), and Directed Energy Weapon Danger
Zones (DEWDZs) for all authorized weapon delivery events.
Impact Area—The area on a range immediately surrounding a target or designated mean point
of impact that is approved for the actual delivery of ordnance. The Impact Area demarcation
should normally be no less than a) 500 feet from the center of a target or desired point of impact
(DPI) approved for live ordnance, or b) 300 feet from the center of a target or DPI used solely for
inert or practice ordnance.
Isotope—Nuclides having the same number of protons in their nuclei, and hence the same
atomic number, but differing in the number of neutrons, and therefore in the mass number.
Almost identical chemical properties exist between isotopes of a particular element. Unstable
isotopes undergo radioactive decay to achieve stability.
Joint Terminal Attack Controller (JTAC)—An individual qualified IAW JP 3-09.3 to provide
terminal control for the delivery of weapons by aircraft.
Joint Use—With respect to ranges, Joint Use means other MAJCOMs or services may use, as
long as they conduct operations IAW this instruction, as supplemented. With respect to range
airspace, it means the use by civil or other military aviation when it is not active.
Land Withdrawal—The process used as a means to transfer administrative jurisdiction from
one federal agency to another. A withdrawal creates a title encumbrance on the land restricting
an agency's ability to manage its lands under multiple use management principles. The
restrictions generally segregate the lands from some or all the public land laws and some or all of
the mining and mineral leasing laws for a specific period of time (generally 20 years for post
FLPMA withdrawals). The Secretary of Interior is authorized to make, modify, extend, or revoke
withdrawals.
Laser Surface Danger Zone—Designated region or ground area where laser radiation levels
may exceed maximum permissible exposure levels, thereby, requiring control during laser
operation.
Lead MAJCOM—As defined in AFI 38-101, a lead MAJCOM consolidates a particular
function in a single MAJCOM, supporting the entire Air Force as applicable.
License—Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) written authorization delegating regulatory
authority to receive, possess, use, or transfer Byproduct, Source, or Special Nuclear Material.
80 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
The NRC has issued a master materials license to the AF RIC, which in turn issues radioactive
material permits to AF units.
Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB)—DoDD 3200.11 establishes policy regarding
MRFTB facilities to include definition, designation and responsibilities.
Material Potentially Presenting an Explosive Hazard (MPPEH)— Material potentially
containing explosives or munitions (e.g., munitions containers and packaging material;
munitions debris remaining after munitions use, demilitarization, or disposal; and range-related
debris); or material potentially containing a high enough concentration of explosives such that
the material presents an explosive hazard (e.g., equipment, drainage systems, holding
tanks, piping, or ventilation ducts that were associated with munitions production,
demilitarization or disposal operations). Excluded from MPPEH are munitions within DoD's
established munitions management system and other hazardous items that may present explosion
hazards (e.g., gasoline cans, compressed gas cylinders) that are not munitions and are not
intended for use as munitions
Military Operations Area (MOA)—Special Use Airspace allocated to the military to
separate/segregate certain military activities from Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) traffic, and to
identify the location of these military activities to Visual Flight Rules (VFR) traffic. VFR aircraft
are not restricted from transiting MOAs.
Military Training Route (MTR)—A low-level, high-speed training route established IAW
criteria in FAA Joint Order 7610.4, Special Operations. MTRs are used by DoD to conduct low
altitude navigation and tactical training, in instrument and visual weather conditions, below an
altitude of 10,000 feet MSL and at airspeeds more than 250 KIAS. Routes are established as IFR
routes (IR) or VFR routes (VR). The FAA has approval authority to implement IRs and the
appropriate MAJCOM approves VR implementation. Environmental documentation is required
for implementation IAW 32 CFR Part 989. VRs are processed through the FAA via the AFREP.
MTRs are published in FLIP AP/1B and charted on FAA Sectionals and DoD Low IFR charts.
AFREPs assign all route numbers.
Mission Essential Personnel—Those personnel on a range directly required for the employment
of ordnance (air/surface/EA) in a test, training or evaluation mission. This may include JTACs,
TACPs, range control officers, scorers, and any other personnel identified as required by the
ROA.
Ordnance—
Boosted Munitions (forward firing): Munitions such as the AGM-65 Maverick missile
and the 2.75” folding fin rocket driven by propellant. These are also considered live
munitions when they are equipped with an explosive or incendiary warhead.
Test: Research and Development of developmental and production munitions, Directed
Energy Weapons (DEW), lasers, and explosives.
Training:
Full-scale Inert: Concrete-filled or cast ductile iron bombs of the same size and
weight of the Live Munition but containing no explosives, pyrotechnics, or
chemical agents.
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 81
Practice Bombs: Practice bombs may be full-scale or sub-scale. Some practice
bombs contain a small explosive charge or pyrotechnic that marks the point of
impact with a small cloud of smoke or flash. For example, BDU-33 practice
bombs contain a MK 4 spotting charge, and MK 82 practice bombs may contain
6.25 pounds of composition C-4 high explosive. British 1,000-pound class
practice bombs may contain 50 pounds of TORPEX. These bombs normally use a
fuze to initiate the high explosive fillers.
Target Practice (TP): Ball projectile gun ammunition that has no explosive in the
projectile.
Live Munitions: Munitions containing a fuze and a high-explosive (HE) or
incendiary warhead designed to detonate either prior to, upon, or shortly after
impact. They can be bombs, missiles, rockets, bullets, etc.
Operational Range—A range that is under the jurisdiction, custody, or control of the Secretary
of Defense and that is used for range activities; or although not currently being used for range
activities that is still considered by the Secretary to be a range and has not been put to a new use
that is incompatible with range activities. (10 U.S.C. 101(e)(3)(A) and (B)). Also includes
“military range,” “active range,” and “inactive range” as those terms are defined in 40 CFR
§266.201.
Penetrator—Dense projectile component of ammunition round designed to pierce armor.
Permit (Noun)—
In General: an official document or certificate giving permission for something.
Radioactive Material Permit: US Air Force or US Navy Radioactive Material Permit
issued to a unit with the respective service, under the authority of that Service’s Master
Materials License.
Product Improvement Working Group (PIWG)—A number of individuals, representing
aerospace equipment users and single managers, assembled together for the purpose of product
improvement.
Program Objective Memorandum (POM)—A biennial memorandum submitted to the
Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) from Military Department and Defense agency. It proposes total
program requirements for the next six years. It includes rationale for planned changes from the
approved Future Years Defense Program (FYDP) baseline within fiscal guidance issued by the
SECDEF.
Prohibited Area—A specified area over the land of a state, or territorial waters adjacent thereto,
within which the flight of aircraft is prohibited in the interest of national security and welfare.
Proponent—The office, unit, single manager or activity at any level that initiates, or is
responsible for an Air Force action.
Radiation—The emissions, either electromagnetic or particulate, resulting from the
transformation of an unstable atom or nucleus.
Radiation Safety Officer—An individual, designated by a Commander or the Air Force
Radioisotope Committee, who has the specific education, military training, and professional
82 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
experience in radiation protection practice, to manage radiation safety activities covered by a
USAF Radioactive Material Permit.
Radioactive Material—Material with unstable nuclei that decay by emission of ionizing
radiation. The radiation emitted may be alpha or beta particles, gamma or X-rays, or neutrons.
Range—
As set forth at 10 U.S.C. § 101(e)(1), the term “range”, when used in a geographic sense,
means a designated land or water area that is set aside, managed, and used for range
activities of the Department of Defense. Such term includes the following:
(A) Firing lines and positions, maneuver areas, firing lanes, test pads, detonation
pads, impact areas, electronic scoring sites, buffer zones with restricted access,
and exclusionary areas.
(B) Airspace areas designated for military use in accordance with regulations and
procedures prescribed by the Administrator of the Federal Aviation
Administration.
As set forth at 10 U.S.C § 101(e)(2), the term “range activities” means—
(A) research, development, testing, and evaluation of military munitions, other
ordnance, and weapons systems; and
(B) the training of members of the armed forces in the use and handling of
military munitions, other ordnance, and weapons systems.
As set forth at 10 U.S.C § 101(e)(3), the term “operational range” means a range that is
under the jurisdiction, custody, or control of the Secretary of a military department and—
(A) that is used for range activities, or
(B) although not currently being used for range activities, that is still considered
by the Secretary to be a range and has not been put to a new use that is
incompatible with range activities.
Active Range—For the purposes of this instruction, an active range is an operational
range that is being used for range activities.
ANG Range—For the purposes of this instruction, ANG ranges include all buildings and
property that is established by the lease, license, permit or other written agreement, for
either exclusive or joint use by the ANG for weapons delivery operations.
Inactive Range—For the purposes of this instruction, an inactive range is an operational
range that is still considered to be a range and has not been put to a new use that is
incompatible with range activities.
Range Clearance—Range clearance (previously known as “range residue clearance,” “range
decontamination,” or “EOD clearance”) is the surface-removal or disposal of MPPEH from the
targets and surrounding areas. MPPEH includes unexploded ordnance, classified ordnance, inert
ordnance debris, and any other range material fired on, or upon a military range.
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 83
Range Clearance Report—A narrative statement about the removal and disposal of UXO and
MPPEH on a specific range, and serves as a factual record of the debris clearance. Also known
as a “Report of Clearance,” it is not a “Certificate of Clearance” (defined above).
Range Control Officer (RCO)—The person with primary responsibility for matters of range
safety during aircraft operations, aircraft emergencies, and ground weapons fire activities during
active events of this nature occurring on the range. Weapons release clearance authority resides
with the RCO (except where the RCO has specifically delegated this authority to a qualified
flight lead, individual pilot or Forward Air Controller, or other briefed person).
Range Operating Authority (ROA)—The wing commander, or designated commander
responsible for operating and maintaining the range. For ANG-operated ranges, the range
commander is designated as the ROA. The ROA may delegate the daily scheduling,
management, and maintenance of the range to any appropriate subordinate unit.
Range Operations Officer (ROO)—The person who supervises range management, planning,
maintenance, and day-to-day operations. Specific responsibilities are designated by the ROA.
The ROO will be qualified as a RCO.
Range Training Officer (RTO)—The person responsible for monitoring ACTS, passing kill
removal, and providing debriefs. The RTO will establish communications with aircraft entering
the range.
Restricted Area—
An area (land, sea or air) in which there are special restrictive measures employed to
prevent or minimize interference between friendly forces or an area under military
jurisdiction in which special security measures are employed to prevent unauthorized
entry.
Airspace where the flight of aircraft, while not wholly prohibited, is subject to restriction.
When not activated by the using agency, the controlling ATC facility may authorize IFR
or VFR operations in the area. If joint use is authorized, the name of the ATC controlling
facility is annotated on the map.
An area that must contain all "Hazardous Activity" as defined by branch of service for
specific type of aircraft using the range.
Scheduling Authority—The agency, organization or military activity responsible for scheduling
all activities in designated land and airspace areas.
Shared Use—When the Range Operating Authority authorizes non-DoD, private or government
agencies or individuals to use range land or airspace concurrently or non-concurrently.
Sortie—A term to describe a single training event performed by one aircraft from takeoff
through landing. A single aircraft may only log one sortie per flight.
Sortie Operation—A term to define the use of training airspace or ranges by a single aircraft. A
single aircraft may log multiple sortie operations per flight by using different training areas or
the same area several times throughout the same flight.
Special Use Airspace (SUA)—Airspace of defined vertical and lateral dimensions wherein
activities are confined. Certain limitations or restrictions may be imposed on non-participating
84 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
aircraft. Except for Controlled Firing Areas, SUA is depicted on aeronautical charts. Types of
Special Use Airspace include:
Alert Area.
Controlled Firing Area.
Military Operations Area.
National Security Area
Prohibited Area.
Restricted Area.
Warning Area.
Surface Danger Zone (SDZ)—The ground and airspace designated for vertical and lateral
containment of projectiles, fragments, debris, and components resulting from the firing,
launching, or detonation of weapon systems to include explosives and demolitions.
Test Areas Control Officer (TACO)—The person responsible for range operations and safety
at a Test Site when no air-to-ground weapons release authority is needed.
Unexploded Ordnance (UXO)—As set forth at 10 U.S.C. § 101(e)(5), the term “unexploded
ordnance” means military munitions that—
(A) have been primed, fused, armed, or otherwise prepared for action;
(B) have been fired, dropped, launched, projected, or placed in such a manner as to
constitute a hazard to operations, installations, personnel, or material; and
(C) remain unexploded, whether by malfunction, design, or any other cause.
Urban Training Facility (as defined in DoDI 1322.27)—Facilities constructed for the primary
purpose of training in an urban environment. They include instrumentation, communications
infrastructure, and the population needed to create a physical urban environment and capabilities
to conduct training in that environment. Facilities can be composed of buildings, subterranean
infrastructure, airfields, and representative building shells, bridges, tunnels, etc, that constitute
target arrays for fixed and rotary wing aircraft. All urban training facilities will support live
training, however, based on the training audience and their training objectives, may support
virtual and constructive training as well.
UXO-Qualified Personnel—Personnel who have performed successfully in military EOD
positions, or are qualified to perform in the following Department of Labor, Service Contract
Act, Directory of Occupations, contractor positions: UXO Technician II, UXO Technician III,
UXO Safety Officer, UXO Quality Control Specialist, or Senior UXO Supervisor. UXO-
Qualified Personnel must also meet DDESB experience and training requirements (DDESB
Technical Paper 18)
US Air Force Master Materials License—The Nuclear Regulatory Commission License issued
to the US Air Force Radioisotope Committee. The Master Materials License delegates to USAF
regulatory authority over Byproduct, Source, and limited quantities of Special Nuclear Material.
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 85
US Air Force Radioactive Material Permit—Written authorization from the US Air Force
Radioisotope Committee allowing USAF organizations to receive, possess, distribute, use,
transfer, or dispose of radioactive materials.
US Air Force Radioisotope Committee (RIC)—A committee established according to, and the
named licensee on USAF Master Materials License. RIC coordinates the regulatory and
administrative aspects of licensing, possessing, distributing, using, transferring, transporting, and
disposing of all radioactive material in the Air Force. See AFI 40-201 for further detail.
Warning Area—
A specified area above, below, or within which there may be potential danger.
Airspace of defined dimensions over international waters that contain activity that may be
hazardous to non-participating aircraft.
An area that must contain all "Hazardous Activity" as defined by branch of service for
specific type of aircraft using the range.
Weapon Danger Zone—The ground and airspace for lateral and vertical containment of a user-
determined percentage of projectiles, fragments, debris, and components resulting from the
firing, launching, and/or detonation of aviation delivered ordnance.
86 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
Attachment 2
US AIR FORCE OPERATED OR OWNED RANGES GOVERNED BY THIS
INSTRUCTION
Note: The “Owner” column in the tables contained in this attachment is intended to reflect the
entity with real property accountability for the range land.
A2.1. Primary Training Ranges.
PTR Name Range Location Operator Owner
Adirondack Ft Drum, New York ANG USA
Airburst Ft Carson, Colorado ANG USA
Atterbury Camp Atterbury, Indiana ANG USA
Avon Park Florida ACC ACC
Barry M. Goldwater Range East Arizona AETC AETC
Belle Fourche Electronic Warfare Site Wyoming ACC ACC
Bollen Range Pennsylvania ANG USA
Cannon Ft Leonard Wood, Missouri ANG USA
Claiborne Range Louisiana AFRC AFRC
Dare County Ranges
AF Dare County Range
Navy Dare County Range
North Carolina
North Carolina
ACC
USN
ACC
ACC
Draughon (Ripsaw) Japan PACAF Japan
Falcon Ft Sill, Oklahoma AFRC USA
Grand Bay Georgia ACC ACC
Grayling Camp Grayling, Michigan ANG USA
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 87
Hardwood Volk Field, Wisconsin ANG ANG
Holloman Ranges
Centennial
Oscura
Red Rio
New Mexico ACC USA
Jefferson Indiana ANG USA
JPARC
Blair Lakes
Oklahoma
Yukon
Eielson AFB, Alaska
Ft Greely, Alaska
Ft Wainwright, Alaska
PACAF
PACAF
PACAF
USA
USA
USA
McMullen Range Texas ANG USN
Melrose Range New Mexico AFSOC AFSOC
Mountain Home Range Complex
Juniper Butte
Saylor Creek
Grasmere Electronic Warfare Site
Idaho ACC ACC
Poinsett Range South Carolina ACC ACC
Polygone Electronic Warfare Site Germany/France USAFE US/
Germany/
France
Razorback Ft Chaffee, Arkansas ANG USA
Shelby Mississippi ANG USA
Smoky Hill Kansas ANG AMC
Snyder Electronic Warfare Site Texas ACC ACC
Torishima Japan PACAF Japan
Townsend Range Georgia ANG USMC
88 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
Warren Grove New Jersey ANG ANG
A2.2. Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB).
MRTFB Name Range Location Operator Owner
412th Test Wing1 Edwards AFB, California AFMC AFMC
96th
Test Wing, to include 96th
Test
Group1
Eglin AFB, Florida &
Holloman AFB, New Mexico AFMC AFMC
Nevada Test & Training Range Nevada ACC ACC
Utah Test & Training Range Utah ACC AFMC
1 The MRTFB names for these entries differ slightly from DoDD 3200.11 due to recent AFMC
organizational changes. The 412th
Test Wing aligns with the Air Force Test Center entry in
DoDD 3200.18. The 96th
Test Wing / 96th
Test Group entry aligns with the 46th
Test Wing/46th
Test Group entry in DoDD 3200.18.
A2.3. Test Sites.
Test Site Name Range Location Operator Owner
AFRL Laser - 1KM, 2KM, 12 KM
Laser Targets Kirtland AFB, New Mexico AFMC AFMC
AFRL Chestnut Test Site Kirtland AFB, New Mexico AFMC AFMC
AFRL High Energy Research Test
Facility Microwave Kirtland AFB, New Mexico AFMC AFMC
Starfire Optical Range Kirtland AFB, New Mexico AFMC AFMC
Range No. 2 and Range No. 3 Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio AFMC AFMC
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 89
Attachment 3
RANGE SUPPORTED MWS TRAINING EVENTS
A3.1. A-10 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
A-10 1 Mission Profiles (General) RAP Range/Airspace Access--
Scheduling/operating hours
A-10 2 Airborne Laser Designation RAP Laser capable
A-10 3 Air Strike Control (ASC)
Actual Ordnance
RAP Live or Inert capable
A-10 4 CAS in Urban Terrain RAP Constructed urban village
A-10 5 Flare RAP Capable
A-10 6 Full Scale Weapons
Delivery (FSWD)/Heavy
Weight
RAP Live or Inert capable
A-10 7 Laser Spot Search/Track
(LSS/T)
RAP Laser capable
A-10 8 LGB RAP Live or inert capable,
laser capable
A-10 9 Maverick Event RAP Live or Inert capable
A-10 10 Night Strafe RAP Strafe pit open during
nighttime
A-10 11 SEAD-C RAP Live or Inert capable, visual
and/or electronic threat
replication
A-10 12 Self-Mark Strafe (Night) RAP Strafe pit with scoring
A-10 13 Strafe RAP Strafe pit with scoring
A-10 14 Target Mark RAP Multiple Targets and strafe
pit, flare capable, laser
capable, or live or inert
capable
A-10 15 Targeting Pod Event RAP Multiple Targets
A-10 16 Chaff RAP Capable
A-10 17 EW Event A/G RAP Threat Emitter
A-10 18 Moving Target Attack RAP Remote-controlled vehicle
90 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
capable of 25 mph
A-10 19 Degraded/Denied Comm RAP Communications Jammer
A-10 20 Degraded/Denied Data Link RAP Data Link Jammer
A-10 21 Degraded/Denied GPS RAP GPS Jammer
A-10 22 Large Force/Flag Exercise RAP Scenario-based threat
replication
A3.2. AC-130 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
AC-130 1 Live Fire RAP HE impact area
AC-130 2 PGM Employment TD Capable of laser and GPS
guided PGM
AC-130 3 Live Fire Radar Profile
(AC130U only)
RAP HE impact area radar firing
capable
AC-130 4 Air to ground gunnery TD Live capable
AC-130 5 Chaff RAP Capable
AC-130 6 Flare RAP Capable
AC-130 7 Threat Event RAP Emitters
AC-130 8 Call-for-fire RAP Live capable
AC-130 9 CAS TD Live capable
AC-130 10 Airborne Laser Designation RAP Laser capable
A3.3. B-1 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
B-1 1 Actual Weapon Release
INERT
RAP Inert capable with separate
cluster-bomb targets set
B-1 2 WCMD Release RAP Live or inert capable and
separate cluster-bomb targets
set
B-1 3 Actual Flare Event RAP Capable
B-1 4 Actual Chaff Event RAP Capable
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 91
B-1 5 EA Threat Activity RAP Electronic Threat Emitter
B-1 6 Targeting Pod Operations RAP Tactical targets, laser
capable
B-1 7 Contested/Degraded Ops RAP GPS and Communications
Jammer
B-1 8 Large Force/Flag Exercise RAP Scenario-based threat
replication
A3.4. B-2 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
B-2 1 AGM-158 Bomb Run RAP Emitters
B-2 2 B61/83 Actual Release RAP Inert capable
B-2 3 GBU-31/28 Actual Release RAP Live or inert capable
B-2 4 GBU-38 Actual Release RAP Live or inert capable
B-2 5 GBU-57 Bomb Run RAP Emitters
B-2 6 Conventional Unguided RAP Live or inert capable
B-2 7 Electronic Threat Activity RAP Electronic Threat Emitter
B-2 8 Large Force/Flag Exercise RAP Scenario-based threat
replication
A3.5. B-52 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
B-52 1 Actual JDAM/WCMD
Release
RAP Live or inert capable and
separate cluster-bomb targets
set
B-52 2 Actual Weapon Release RAP Live or inert capable
B-52 3 JDAM/WCMD Jettison RAP Live or inert capable
B-52 4 Laser Spot Search/Track
(LSS/T)
RAP Laser capable
B-52 5 LGB Actual Weapon
Release
RAP Live or inert capable, laser
capable
B-52 6 Chaff/Flare Exercise RAP Chaff/flare capable
92 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
B-52 7 TGP employment with
Inertially Aided Munitions
(IAM)
RAP Live or inert capable
B-52 8 EA threat activity RAP Threat Emitter
B-52 9 Large Force/Flag Exercise RAP Scenario-based threat
replication
A3.6. C-17 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
C-17 1 AD CDS Actual Vol 1 Drop Zone
C-17 2 Air Drop Equip Actual Vol 1 Drop Zone
C-17 3 Air Drop Personnel Actual Vol 1 Drop Zone
C-17 4 Flare / LASER IRCM Vol 1 Simulator Capable
C-17 5 PADS Airdrop Event Vol 1 Capable
C-17 6 Tactical Airdrop Night Vol 1 Drop Zone-night hours
C-17 7 Threat Event Vol 1 Emitters
C-17 8 EW Event Vol 1 Emitters
C-17 9 Contested/Degraded Ops Vol 1 Emitters, GPS Jammer,
Comm Jammer. Data Link
Jammer
C-17 10 Large Force/Flag Exercise Vol 1 Scenario-based threat
replication
C-17 11 Assault Landing (Day) Vol 1 Assault Strip
C-17 12 Assault Landing (Semi
Prepared Runway Ops)
Vol 1 Dirt Assault Strip
C-17 13 Assault Landing (NVG
Ops)
Vol 1 Assault Strip—night hours
A3.7. C-130 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
C-130 1 AD CDS Actual Vol 1 Drop Zone
C-130 2 Air Drop Equip Actual Vol 1 Drop Zone
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 93
C-130 3 Air Drop Personnel Actual Vol 1 Drop Zone
C-130 4 Tactical Airdrop Night Vol 1 Drop Zone-night hours
C-130 5 PADS Airdrop Event Vol 1 Capable
C-130 6 Flare Vol 1 Capable
C-130 7 Chaff Vol 1 Capable
C-130 8 Threat Event Vol 1 Emitters
C-130 9 Contested/Degraded Ops Vol 1 Emitters, GPS Jammer,
Comm Jammer, Data Link
Jammer
C-130 10 Large Force/Flag Exercise Vol 1 Scenario-based threat
replication
C-130 11 Assault Landing (Day) Vol 1 Capable Range; Capable
Airspace (allow Tactical
Arr/Dep)
C-130 12 Assault Landing (Semi
Prepared Runway Ops)
Vol 1 Capable Range; Capable
Airspace
C-130 13 Assault Landing (NVG
Ops)
Vol 1 Capable Range; Capable
Airspace; STS Support
A3.8. C-145 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
C-145 1 Low Cost Low Altitude
Airdrop
RAP Drop zone day/night
C-145 2 NVG Airdrop RAP Drop zone day/night
C-145 3 NVG Infil/Exfil RAP Blacked out LZ
C-145 4 Semi-Prepared Surface
Landing/Takeoff
RAP Dirt LZ
C-145 5 Military free fall TD Drop zone day/night
C-145 6 Live Fire TD Impact area day/night
C-145 7 Airland - improved surface TD Hard surface LZ
C-145 8 Airland - unimproved
surface
TD Dirt/Clay surface LZ
C-145 9 Airdrop
(personnel/CDS/equipment)
TD Day/night DZ
94 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
C-145 10 Air to ground Gunnery TD Live Capable
A3.9. C-146 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
C-146 1 NVG Infil/Exfil Blacked out LZ
C-146 2 Semi-Prepared Surface
Landing/Takeoff
Dirt LZ
A3.10. CV-22 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
CV-22 1 Infil/Exfil Training RAP Landing Zone
CV-22 2 Alternate
Insertion/Extraction
RAP Landing Zone/Drop Zone
CV-22 3 Chaff RAP Capable
CV-22 4 Flare RAP Capable
CV-22 5 EW Event RAP Emitters
CV-22 6 Hoist Training RAP Landing Zone/Drop
Zone/HLZ
CV-22 7 Airland - improved surface RAP Hard surface HLZ
CV-22 8 Airland - unimproved
surface
RAP Dirt/Clay surface HLZ
CV-22 9 Air to ground gunnery RAP Live Capable
CV-22 10 Military Free Fall (MFF) RAP Drop Zone
A3.11. E-3 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
E-3 1 EW Event RAP Emitters
E-3 2 Large Force/Flag Exercise RAP Scenario-based threat
replication
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 95
A3.12. E-8 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
E-8 1 Large Force/Flag Exercise RAP Scenario-based threat
replication
E-8 2 Moving Target RAP Capable
E-8 3 EW Event RAP Emitters
A3.13. EC-130 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
EC-130 1 Smokey SAM Event Capable
EC-130 2 Large Force/Flag Exercise Scenario-based threat
replication
A3.14. EOD Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
EOD
Tech
1 EOD/Demolition Training TD Site mock ups and QDR
Capable
A3.15. F-15C Events
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
F-15C 1 Aerial Gunnery RAP Live capable, airborne target
F-15C 2 Chaff RAP Capable
F-15C 3 Flare RAP Capable
F-15C 4 EW Event RAP Emitters
F-15C 5 Large Force/Flag Exercise RAP Scenario-based threat
replication
96 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
A3.16. F-15E Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
F-15E 1 Aerial Gunnery RAP Live capable, airborne target
F-15E 2 Chaff RAP Capable
F-15E 3 Flare RAP Capable
F-15E 4 EW Event RAP Emitters
F-15E 5 IAM Actual RAP Live or Inert capable
F-15E 6 Moving Target LGB/Strafe RAP Laser capable and remote-
controlled vehicle capable of
25 mph
F-15E 7 Strafe RAP Strafe pit with scoring
F-15E 8 PGM Actual RAP Live or inert capable, laser
capable
F-15E 9 Large Force/Flag Exercise RAP Scenario-based threat
replication
A3.17. F-16 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
F-16 1 Aerial Gunnery RAP Live capable, airborne target
F-16 2 Chaff RAP Capable
F-16 3 CAS in Urban Terrain RAP Constructed urban village
F-16 4 Full Scale Weapons
Delivery (FSWD)/Heavy
Weight
RAP Live or Inert capable
F-16 5 Flare RAP Capable
F-16 6 Inertial Aided Munitions
(IAM) Actual
RAP Live or Inert capable
F-16 7 LGB Actual RAP Live or inert capable, laser
capable
F-16 8 Strafe RAP Strafe pit with scoring
F-16 9 Night Strafe RAP Strafe pit open during
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 97
nighttime
F-16 10 EW Event RAP Emitters
F-16 11 Moving Target LGB Attack RAP Laser capable and remote-
controlled vehicle capable of
25 mph
F-16 12 Moving Target Strafe RAP Remote-controlled vehicle
capable of 25 mph
F-16 13 Large Force/Flag Exercise RAP Scenario-based threat
replication
A3.18. F-22 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
F-22 1 Aerial Gunnery RAP Live capable, airborne target
F-22 2 Chaff RAP Capable
F-22 3 EW Event RAP Emitters
F-22 4 Flare RAP Capable
F-22 5 Large Force/Flag Exercise RAP Scenario-based threat
replication
A3.19. F-35 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
F-35 1 Aerial Gunnery RAP Live capable, airborne target
F-35 2 Air Strike Control (ASC)
Actual Ordnance
RAP Live or Inert capable
F-35 3 CAS in Urban Terrain RAP Constructed urban village
F-35 4 EW Event RAP Emitters
F-35 5 Full Scale Weapons Deliver
(FSWD)/Heavy Weight
RAP Live or Inert capable
F-35 6 Inertial Aided Munitions
(IAM) Actual
RAP Live or Inert capable
F-35 7 LGB Actual RAP Live or inert capable, laser
capable
F-35 8 Moving Target LGB Attack RAP Laser capable and remote-
98 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
controlled vehicle capable of
25 mph
F-35 9 Moving Target Strafe RAP Remote-controlled vehicle
capable of 25 mph
F-35 10 Night Strafe RAP Strafe pit open during
nighttime
F-35 11 Target Mark RAP Multiple Targets and strafe
pit, flare capable, laser
capable, or live or inert
capable
F-35 12 Large Force/Flag Exercise RAP Scenario-based threat
replication
A3.20. German Air Force (GAF) Tornado Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
GAF
Tornado
1 Aerial Gunnery RAP Live capable, airborne target
GAF
Tornado
2 Chaff RAP Capable
GAF
Tornado
3 CAS in urban terrain RAP Constructed urban village
GAF
Tornado
4 Full Scale Weapons
Delivery (FSWD) Heavy
Weight
RAP Live or inert capable
GAF
Tornado
5 Flare RAP
GAF
Tornado
6 Inertial Aided Munitions
(IAM) Actual
RAP Live or inert capable
GAF
Tornado
7 LGB Actual RAP Live or inert capable, laser
capable
GAF
Tornado
8 Strafe RAP Strafe pit with scoring
GAF
Tornado
9 EW Event RAP Emitters
GAF
Tornado
10 Moving Target LGB/Strafe
attack
RAP Laser capable, remote
controlled vehicle
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 99
GAF
Tornado
11 Live air-to-air missile firing
(IR missile)
RAP Live capable, airborne target
GAF
Tornado
12 Large Force/Flag Exercise RAP Scenario-based threat
replication
A3.21. Ground Combat Trainer Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
Ground
Combat
Trainer
1 Ground Combat Training TD
A3.22. HC-130 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
HC-130 1 AD CDS Actual RAP Drop Zone
HC-130 2 Heavy Equipment Airdrop RAP Drop Zone
HC-130 3 Air Drop Personnel Actual RAP Drop Zone
HC-130 4 Tactical Airdrop Night RAP Drop Zone – night hours
HC-130 5 PADS Airdrop Event RAP Capable
HC-130 6 Flare RAP Capable
HC-130 7 Chaff RAP Capable
HC-130 8 Threat Event RAP Emitters
HC-130 9 Max Effort Landing RAP Capable Range; Capable
Airspace (allow tactical
Arr/Dep)
HC-130 10 Max Effort Night Landing RAP Capable Range; Capable
Airspace
HC-130 11 Contested/Degraded Ops RAP Emitters, GPS Jammer,
Comm Jammer, Data Link
Jammer
100 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
A3.23. HH-60 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
HH-60 1 Chaff RAP Capable
HH-60 2 Flare RAP Capable
HH-60 3 EW Event RAP Emitters
HH-60 4 Contested/Degraded Ops RAP Emitters, GPS Jammer,
Comm Jammer
HH-60 5 Helicopter Gunnery Event RAP Multiple targets and strafe
pit
A3.24. Joint Terminal Attack Controller (JTAC) Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
JTAC 1 TAC mission--Day 13-
112V1
Day Range Access
w/participating aircraft
JTAC 2 TAC mission--Night 13-
112V1
Night Range Access
w/participating aircraft
JTAC 4 TAC mission--live ordnance 13-
112V1
Live or Inert capable
JTAC 5 Control Type 1 TAC
mission.
13-
112V1
Range Access
w/participating aircraft
JTAC 6 Control Type 2 TAC
mission
13-
112V1
Range Access
w/participating aircraft
JTAC 7 Laser Target Designation 13-
112V1
Laser Capable
JTAC 8 Control CAS mission 13-
112V1
Range Access
w/participating aircraft
A3.25. KC-10 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
KC-10 1 Contested/Degraded Ops Vol 1 Emitters, GPS Jammer,
Comm Jammer. Data Link
Jammer
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 101
KC-10 2 Large Force/Flag Exercise RAP Scenario-based threat
replication
A3.26. KC-46 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
KC-46 1 IRCM / LASER Vol 1 Simulator Capable
KC-46 2 Threat Event Vol 1 Emitters
KC-46 3 EW Event RAP Emitters
KC-46 4 Contested/Degraded Ops Vol 1 Emitters, GPS Jammer,
Comm Jammer. Data Link
Jammer
KC-46 5 Large Force/Flag Exercise RAP Scenario-based threat
replication
A3.27. KC-135 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
KC-135 1 Contested/Degraded Ops Vol 1 Emitters, GPS Jammer,
Comm Jammer. Data Link
Jammer
KC-135 2 Large Force/Flag Exercise RAP Scenario-based threat
replication
A3.28. MC-130 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
MC-130 1 Airdrop Heavy equipment RAP Drop zone day/night
MC-130 2 Airdrop High Speed RAP Drop zone day/night
MC-130 3 Airdrop High Altitude RAP Drop zone day/night
MC-130 4 Airdrop Visual RAP Drop zone day/night
MC-130 5 Airdrop Personnel RAP Drop zone day/night
MC-130 6 Airdrop Container Delivery RAP Drop zone day/night
102 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
System
MC-130 7 Airdrop Low Cost Low
Altitude (LCLA)
RAP Drop zone day/night
MC-130 8 Airdrop Joint Precision Air
Drop System (JPADS)
RAP Drop zone day/night
MC-130 9 Forward Area Refueling
Point (FARP)
RAP Landing zone
day/night/blacked out
MC-130 10 Infil/Exfil RAP Landing zone
day/night/blacked out
MC-130 11 Max Effort Takeoff RAP Landing zone
day/night/blacked out
MC-130 12 Assault Landing RAP Landing zone
day/night/blacked out
MC-130 13 Self-Contained Approach
(SCA) Training
RAP Landing zone
day/night/blacked out
MC-130 14 Receiver Air-to-Air
Refueling
RAP AAR Track day/night
MC-130 15 Tanker Air-to-Air Refueling RAP HAAR/TAAR Tracks
day/night
MC-130 16 Air Intercept Training RAP Large Block Altitude
day/night
MC-130 17 Surface Radar RAP Emitters
MC-130 18 NVG Landing/Takeoff RAP Blacked out LZ
MC-130 19 Airland - improved surface RAP Hard surface LZ
MC-130 20 Airland - unimproved
surface
RAP Dirt/Clay surface LZ
MC-130 21 Chaff RAP Capable
MC-130 22 Flare RAP Capable
MC-130 23 Threat Event RAP Emitters
A3.29. MQ-1 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
MQ-1 1 Buddy Lase RAP Laser capable
MQ-1 2 Hellfire RAP Live or inert capable, laser
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 103
capable
A3.30. MQ-9 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
MQ-9 1 Buddy Lase RAP Laser capable
MQ-9 2 Hellfire RAP Live or inert capable, laser
capable
MQ-9 3 IAM RAP Live or inert capable
MQ-9 4 LGB RAP Laser capable
A3.31. PC-12 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
PC-12 1 Shortfield procedures RAP LZ day/night
PC-12 2 NVG Air/land RAP LZ AMP3/4
PC-12 3 Semi-Prepared Surface
Landing/Takeoff
RAP Dirt LZ
PC-12 4 Low Cost Low Altitude
Airdrop
RAP Drop zone day/night
PC-12 5 NVG Airdrop RAP Drop zone day/night
PC-12 6 NVG Infil/Exfil RAP Blacked out LZ
A3.32. RC-135 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
RC-135 1 Contingency Scenario-based threat
replication
RC-135 2 Sensitive Recon Operation Scenario-based threat
replication
RC-135 3 SEAD Integration Scenario-based threat
replication
RC-135 4 Contested/Degraded Ops GPS and Communications
Jammer
104 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
RC-135 5 Collection Electronic Emitter
RC-135 6 Annual CSAR Integration
Scenario
Scenario-based threat
replication
RC-135 7 Electronic Warfare Activity Multiple Emitters
A3.33. Small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUAS) Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
sUAS 1 UAS Training TD Multiple large open areas
within restricted
airspace/supporting
frequency allocations
A3.34. Special Tactics Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
Special
Tactics
1 Parachute Insertion TD Static line/HALO Personnel
Drop Zone/day/night/water
Special
Tactics
2 Parachute Insertion TD Static line/HALO Personnel
Drop Zone/day/night
Special
Tactics
3 Alternate
Insertion/Extraction
Operations
TD RW/Tiltrotor Drop/Landing
Zone/day/night
Special
Tactics
4 All Terrain/Tactical Vehicle
Operations
TD ATV Practice Course
Special
Tactics
5 Terminal Control
Operations
TD Live or inert capable
Special
Tactics
6 Demolition TD Demolition capable
Special
Tactics
7 Combat/Tactical Operations TD Light/heavy weapons,
MOUT, SMUT
Special
Tactics
8 Small Unmanned Aerial
Systems
TD SUAS capable
Special
Tactics
9 Assault Zone Operations TD Capable
Special 10 Medical/CSAR/PR TD Capable
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 105
Tactics
A3.35. T-38C (IFF) Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
T-38C
(IFF)
1 Aerial Gunnery (see note
below)
Syllabus Restricted Area Airspace
T-38C
(IFF)
2 10-degree LAHD Syllabus Live or inert capable
T-38C
(IFF)
3 10-degree LAHD pop Syllabus Live or inert capable
T-38C
(IFF)
4 Strafe (high or low angle) Syllabus Strafe pit
T-38C
(IFF)
5 Visual Level Delivery
(VLD)
Syllabus Live or inert capable
Note: Aerial Gunnery is simulated, but requires restricted airspace by AETC policy due to
student pilots. While training events which only require airspace are generally outside the scope
of this AFI, an exception is made for this unique case.
A3.36. Tactical Air Control Party (TACP) Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
TACP 1 Ground Training (All) TD Bivouac, Land nav, ground
maneuver, vehicle convoy,
SERE, CQB Capable
A3.37. U-28 Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
U-28 1 Shortfield procedures LZ day/night
U-28 2 NVG Air/land RAP LZ blacked out
U-28 3 Semi-Prepared Surface
Landing/Takeoff
RAP Dirt LZ
U-28 4 Low Cost Low Altitude
(LCLA) Airdrop
RAP
106 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
U-28 5 NVG Airdrop RAP Drop Zone-night hours
U-28 6 NVG Infil/Exfil RAP Blacked-out Landing Zone:
night
U-28 7 ISR training RAP Airspace
U-28 8 Airland - improved surface TD Hard surface HLZ
U-28 9 Airland - unimproved
surface
TD Dirt/Clay surface HLZ
U-28 10 Buddy Lase RAP Laser capable
U-28 11 Flare TD Capable
U-28 12 Threat Event TD Emitters
U-28 13 ISR event with ground
element
TD Restricted access roadwork
with obscuration areas
capable
A3.38. UH-1N Events.
MWS Event
Number
Event Event
Source
Range Capability
UH-1N 1 Helicopter Gunnery RAP Multiple targets, live call-
for-fire
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 107
Attachment 4
ASSIGNED RANGE USERS AND TRAINING EVENTS
Note: The tables in this section must be used in conjunction with Attachment 3. The numbers in
the “MWS Events” column below correspond to the “Event Number” for the specified MWS as
listed in Attachment 3. Dashes between numbers reflect an inclusive range of events. For
example, a MWS Events value of “3--6” means events 3, 4, 5, and 6.
A4.1. Adirondack Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Adirondack 158 FW 134 FS VT F-16 2--10
Adirondack 174
ATW
138
ATKS
NY MQ-9 1--4
Adirondack 175 WG 104 FS MD A-10 1--15
Adirondack 177FW 119 FS NJ F-16 2--10
Adirondack 914 AW 328 AS NY C-130 1--5
Adirondack 93
AGOW
20 ASOS NY JTAC 1--8
A4.2. Airburst Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Airburst 302 AW 731 AS CO C-130 1--4
Airburst 302 AW 52 AS CO C-130 1--4
Airburst 93
AGOW
13 ASOS CO JTAC 1--8
A4.3. Atterbury Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Atterbury 123 AW 165 AS KY C-130 1--4
108 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
Atterbury 127 FW 107 FS MI A-10 1--15
Atterbury 178
ISRW
162 RS OH MQ-1 1--2
Atterbury 180 FW 112 FS OH F-16 1--10
A4.4. Avon Park Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Avon Park 23 WG 74 FS GA A-10 9
Avon Park 23 WG 75 FS GA A-10 9
Avon Park 23 WG 41 RQS GA HH-60G 1
Avon Park 23 WG 71 RQS GA HC-130 1--5, 7
Avon Park 482 FW 93 FS FL F-16 2--9
Avon Park 437 AW 14 AS SC C-17 1--4, 11, 13
Avon Park 437 AW 15 AS SC C-17 1--4, 11, 13
Avon Park 437 AW 16 AS SC C-17 1--4, 11, 13
Avon Park 437 AW 17 AS SC C-17 1--4, 11, 13
Avon Park 24 SOW 24 STS NC JTAC 1--8
Avon Park 24 SOW 23 STS FL JTAC 1--8
A4.5. Barry M. Goldwater Range (BMGR) Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
BMGR 162 FW 148 FS AZ F-16 2--10, 12, 13
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 109
BMGR 162 FW 152 FS AZ F-16 2--10, 12, 13
BMGR 162 FW 195 FS AZ F-16 2--10, 12, 13
BMGR 162 FW AATC AZ F-16 2--13
BMGR 162 FW AATC AZ A-10 1--22
BMGR 442 FW 47 FS AZ A-10 1--22
BMGR 355 FW 354 FS AZ A-10 1--18
BMGR 355 FW 357 FS AZ A-10 1--18
BMGR 56 FW 21 FS AZ F-16 2--10, 12, 13
BMGR 56 FW 61 FS AZ F-35 2--12
BMGR 56 FW 308 FS AZ F-16 2--10, 12, 13
BMGR 56 FW 309 FS AZ F-16 2--10, 12, 13
BMGR 56 FW 310 FS AZ F-16 2--10, 12, 13
BMGR 56 FW 311 FS NM F-16 10, 12
BMGR 56 FW 314 FS NM F-16 10, 12
BMGR 56 FW 425 FS AZ F-16 2--10, 12, 13
BMGR 56 FW 56 CES AZ EOD Tech 1
BMGR 23 WG 55 RQS AZ HH-60G 1--3
BMGR 23 WG 79 RQS AZ HC-130 1--10
BMGR 53 WG 88 TES AZ HC-130 1--8
BMGR 55 WG 41 ECS AZ EC-130 1
BMGR 55 WG 43 ECS AZ EC-130 1
BMGR 161 ARW 197 ARS AZ KC-135 1--2
BMGR 920 RW 305 RQS AZ HH-60G 1--4
A4.6. Belle Fourche Electronic Warfare Site Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
110 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
Belle
Fourche
28 BW 34 BS SD B-1 5--6
Belle
Fourche
28 BW 37 BS SD B-1 5--6
Belle
Fourche
55 WG 343 RS NE RC-135 5, 7
Belle
Fourche
55 WG 38 RS NE RC-135 5, 7
Belle
Fourche
55 WG 45 RS NE RC-135 5, 7
Belle
Fourche
55 WG 338 CTS NE RC-135 5, 7
Belle
Fourche
5 BW 23 BS ND B-52 8
Belle
Fourche
5 BW 69 BS ND B-52 4, 8
A4.7. Bollen Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Bollen 113 FW 121 FS MD F-16 2--9
Bollen 174 ATW 138 ATS NY MQ-9 1--4
Bollen 175 WG 104 FS MD A-10 1--15
Bollen 177 FW 119 FS NJ F-16 2--9
Bollen 193 SOW 112 AOS PA
Bollen 193 SOW 148 ASOS PA
Bollen 910 AW 757 AS OH C-130 1--4
Bollen 911 AW 758 AS PA C-130 1--8
Bollen USAFWS 57 WPS NJ C-17 4, 7
Bollen 436 AW 3 AS DE C-17 4, 7, 8
Bollen 305
AMW
6 AS NJ C-17 4, 7, 8
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 111
A4.8. Cannon Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Cannon 138 FW 125 FW OK F-16 2--9
Cannon 139 AW 180 AS MO C-130 1--4
Cannon 188 FW 184 FS AR A-10 1--15
Cannon 442 FW 303 FS MO A-10 1--15
Cannon 314 AW 48 AS AR C-130 1--4, 6, 8
A4.9. Claiborne Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Claiborne 2 BW 20 BS LA B-52 8
Claiborne 307 BW 93 BS LA B-52 2, 4
Claiborne 307 BW 343 BS LA B-52 2, 4
Claiborne 53 WG 49 TES LA B-52 2, 8
Claiborne 159 FW 122 FS LA F-15 7 - 8
Claiborne 159 FW 122 ASOS LA JTAC 1--2
Claiborne 93
AGOW
9 ASOS TX JTAC 1--8
Claiborne 93
AGOW
712 ASOS TX JTAC 1--8
Claiborne 19 AW 34 CTS AR C-130 6--8
Claiborne 317 AG 39 AS TX C-130 1--4, 6
Claiborne 317 AG 40 AS TX C-130 1--4, 6
112 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
A4.10. Dare County Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Dare County 4 FW 333 FS NC F-15E 3--8
Dare County 4 FW 334 FS NC F-15E 3--8
Dare County 4 FW 335 FS NC F-15E 3--8
Dare County 4 FW 336 FS NC F-15E 3--8
Dare County 944 FW 307 FS NC F-15E 3--8
Dare County 93
AGOW
14 ASOS NC JTAC 1--8
Dare County 93
AGOW
15 ASOS GA JTAC 1--8
A4.11. Draughon Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
A4.12. Eglin Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Eglin 1 SOW 15 SOS FL MC-130 1--23
Eglin 1 SOW 9 SOS FL MC-130 1--23
Eglin 1 SOW 8 SOS FL CV-22 1--10
Eglin 1 SOW 6 SOS FL C-145 1--5, 7--9
Eglin 1 SOW 4 SOS FL AC-130 1, 3--10
Eglin 1 SOW 319 SOS FL PC-12 1--6
Eglin 1 SOW 319 SOS FL U-28 1--13
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 113
Eglin 1 SOW 34 SOS FL U-28 1--13
Eglin 24 SOW 23 STS FL Special
Tactics
1--10
Eglin 24 SOW 720 STG FL Special
Tactics
1--10
Eglin 24 SOW STTS FL Special
Tactics
1--10
Eglin 919 SOW 711 SOS FL C-145 1--5, 7--9
Eglin AFSOAWC 19 SOS FL AC-130 1, 3--10
Eglin AFSOAWC 19 SOS FL MC-130 1--7
Eglin USAFWS 14 WPS FL AC-130 1, 3--10
Eglin AFSOAWC 371
SOCTS
FL Ground
Combat
Trainers
1
Eglin AFSOAWC Det 1,
371
SOCTS
FL Small
UAS
1
Eglin USAFWS 14 WPS FL U-28 1--13
Eglin USAFWS 14 WPS FL MC-130 1--23
Eglin 53 WG 85 TES FL F-15E 2--5, 7, 8
Eglin 53 WG 85 TES FL F-16 2, 4--10
Eglin 33 FW 58 FS FL F-35 2, 4--7, 10--11
Eglin 325 FW 43 FS FL F-22 2--4
Eglin 325 FW 95 FS FL F-22 2--4
Eglin AETC Det 3,
342 TRS
FL TACP 1
114 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
A4.13. Falcon Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Falcon 301 FW 457 FS TX F-16 1--13
Falcon 97 AMW 58 AS OK C-17 1--8
Falcon 80 FTW 88 FTS TX T-38C
(IFF)
1--5
A4.14. Grand Bay Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Grand Bay 23 WG 74 FS GA A-10 1--8, 10--15, 17
Grand Bay 23 WG 75 FS GA A-10 1--8, 10--15, 17
Grand Bay 23 WG 41 RQS GA HH-60G 2--3
Grand Bay 23 WG 71 RQS GA HC-130 6, 8--10
Grand Bay 442 FW 76 FS GA A-10 1--18
A4.15. Grayling Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Grayling 180 FW 112 FS OH F-16 2--9
Grayling 5 BW 69 BS ND B-52 5, 7
A4.16. Hardwood Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Hardwood 115 FW 176 FS WI F-16 2--10, 13
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 115
Hardwood 132 FW 124 FS IA F-16 2--10, 13
Hardwood 148 FW 179 FS MN F-16 2--10, 13
Hardwood 133 AW 109 AS MN C-130 6--8
Hardwood 934 AW 96 AS MN C-130 4
A4.17. Holloman Ranges Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Holloman
Ranges
49 WG 6 RS NM MQ-1 1--2
Holloman
Ranges
49 WG 9 ATKS NM MQ-9 1--4
Holloman
Ranges
49 WG 29 ATKS NM MQ-9 1--4
Holloman
Ranges
49 WG 16 TRS NM MQ-9 1--4
Holloman
Ranges
93
AGOW
7 ASOS TX JTAC 1--8
Holloman
Ranges
27 SOW 3 SOS NM MQ-9 2--4
Holloman
Ranges
27 SOW 33 SOS NM MQ-9 2--4
Holloman
Ranges
56 FW 311 FS NM F-16 2--9, 13
Holloman
Ranges
56 FW 314 FS NM F-16 2--9, 13
Holloman
Ranges
GAF
FTC
-- NM GAF
Tornado
1--8
116 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
A4.18. Jefferson Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Jefferson 178 FW 162 RS OH MQ-1 1--2
Jefferson 180 FW 112 FS OH F-16 2--9
A4.19. Joint Pacific Alaska Range Complex (JPARC) Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
JPARC 18 WG 67 FS Japan F-15 1--5
JPARC 18 WG 961
AACS
Japan E-3 1--2
JPARC 35 FW 13 FS Japan F-16 2--10, 12--13
JPARC 35 FW 14 FS Japan F-16 2--10, 12--13
JPARC 354 FW 18 AGS AK F-16 2--10, 12--13
JPARC 354 FW 3 ASOS AK JTAC 1--8
JPARC 51 FW 25 FS Korea A-10 1--18, 21--22
JPARC 51 FW 36 FS Korea F-16 2--10, 12--13
JPARC 8 FW 35 FS Korea F-16 2--10, 12--13
JPARC 8 FW 80 FS Korea F-16 2--10, 12--13
JPARC 3 WG 517 AS AK C-17 1--8, 10--13
JPARC 62 AW 4 AS WA C-17 1--3, 6
JPARC 62 AW 7 AS WA C-17 1--3, 6
JPARC 62 AW 8 AS WA C-17 1--3, 6
JPARC 62 AW 10 AS WA C-17 1--3, 6
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 117
JPARC 176 AW 249 AS AK C-17 1--8, 10--13
JPARC 168
ARW
168 ARS AK KC-135 2
A4.20. McMullen Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
McMullen 149 FW 182 FS TX F-16 2--5, 8--10
McMullen 12 FTW 435 FTS TX T-38C 1--5
A4.21. Melrose Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Melrose 24 SOW 26 STS NM Special
Tactics
1--10
Melrose 27 SOW 3 SOS NM MQ-1 1
Melrose 27 SOW 16 SOS NM AC-130 1, 3--10
Melrose 27 SOW 20 SOS NM CV-22 1--10
Melrose 27 SOW 33 SOS NM MQ-9 1
Melrose 27 SOW 73 SOS NM AC-130 1, 3--10
Melrose 27 SOW 318 SOS NM PC-12 1--6
Melrose 27 SOW 318 SOS NM U-28 1--13
Melrose 27 SOW 318 SOS NM C-145 1--10
Melrose 27 SOW 522 SOS NM MC-130 1--23
Melrose 27 SOW 524 SOS NM C-146 1--2
Melrose AFSOAWC 551 SOS NM AC-130 1, 3--10
Melrose 7 BW 9 BS TX B-1 1, 3, 4
Melrose 7 BW 28 BS TX B-1 1, 3, 4
Melrose 53 WG 337 TES TX B-1 1, 3, 4
118 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
Melrose 58 SOW 71 SOS NM CV-22 1--10
Melrose 58 SOW 512 RQS NM UH-1N 1
Melrose 58 SOW 512 RQS NM HH-60 1--5
Melrose 58 SOW 550 SOS NM HC-130 1--8
Melrose 58 SOW 550 SOS NM MC-130 1--8, 17--18
Melrose 58 SOW 415 SOS NM HC-130 1--8
Melrose 58 SOW 415 SOS NM MC-130 1--8
Melrose USAFWS 77 WPS TX B-1 1, 3, 4
Melrose 2 BW 11 BS LA B-52 2, 8
A4.22. Mountain Home Range Complex Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Mountain
Home
366 FW 389 FS ID F-15E 2--8
Mountain
Home
366 FW 391 FS ID F-15E 2--8
Mountain
Home
366 FW 428 FS ID F-15SG 2--8
Mountain
Home
124 FW 124 ASOS ID JTAC 1--8
Mountain
Home
GAF
FTC
-- NM GAF
Tornado
9, 10, 12
Mountain
Home
5 BW 23 BS ND B-52 4, 6, 9
Mountain
Home
124 FW 190 FS ID A-10 TBD
Mountain
Home
24 SOW 22 STS WA JTAC 1--8
Mountain
Home
OR ANG
Combat
Ops Gp
125 STS OR JTAC 1--8
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 119
A4.23. Nevada Test & Training Range (NTTR) Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit (Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
NTTR 1 FW 27 FS VA F-22 5
NTTR 1 FW 94 FS VA F-22 5
NTTR 20 FW 55 FS SC F-16 13
NTTR 20 FW 77 FS SC F-16 13
NTTR 20 FW 79 FS SC F-16 13
NTTR 23 WG 74 FS GA A-10 18--22
NTTR 23 WG 75 FS GA A-10 18--22
NTTR 23 WG 41 RQS GA HH-60G 4
NTTR 23 WG 55 RQS AZ HH-60G 4
NTTR 23 WG 58 RQS NV Special
Tactics
1--10
NTTR 23 WG 66 RQS NV HH-60G 1--4
NTTR 23 WG 71 RQS GA HC-130 11
NTTR 23 WG 79 RQS AZ HC-130 11
NTTR 28 BW 34 BS SD B-1 7--8
NTTR 28 BW 37 BS SD B-1 7--8
NTTR 325 FW 43 FS FL F-22 5
NTTR 325 FW 95 FS FL F-22 5
NTTR 355 FW 354 FS AZ A-10 19--22
NTTR 355 FW 357 FS AZ A-10 19--22
NTTR 366 FW 389 FS ID F-15E 9
NTTR 366 FW 391 FS ID F-15E 9
NTTR 388 FW 4 FS UT F-16 13
NTTR 388 FW 421 FS UT F-16 13
NTTR 388 FW 34 FS UT F-35 13
NTTR 4 FW 334 FS NC F-15E 9
NTTR 4 FW 335 FS NC F-15E 9
NTTR 4 FW 336 FS NC F-15E 9
NTTR 432 WG 11 RS NV MQ-1 1--2
120 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
NTTR 432 WG 15 RS NV MQ-1 1--2
NTTR 432 WG 17 RS NV MQ-1 1--2
NTTR 432 WG 18 RS NV MQ-1 1--2
NTTR 461 ACW 12 AC2S GA E-8 1--3
NTTR 461 ACW 16 AC2S GA E-8 1--3
NTTR 53 WG 85 TES FL F-15E 9
NTTR 53 WG 88 TES NV HH-60G 1--4
NTTR 53 WG 337 TES TX B-1 7, 8
NTTR 53 WG 422 TES NV A-10 1--22
NTTR 53 WG 422 TES NV F-16 2--3
NTTR 53 WG 422 TES VA F-22 3--5
NTTR 53 WG 556 TES NV MQ-1 1--2
NTTR 55 WG 41 ECS AZ EC-130 2
NTTR 55 WG 43 ECS AZ EC-130 2
NTTR 55 WG 338 CTS NE RC-135 1--4, 6
NTTR 55 WG 343 RS NE RC-135 1--4, 6
NTTR 55 WG 38 RS NE RC-135 1--4, 6
NTTR 55 WG 45 RS NE RC-135 1--4, 6
NTTR 552 ACW 960 ACS OK E-3 2
NTTR 552 ACW 963 ACS OK E-3 2
NTTR 552 ACW 964 ACS OK E-3 2
NTTR 552 ACW 965 ACS OK E-3 2
NTTR 57 WG 64 AGS NV F-16 2--13
NTTR 7 BW 28 BS TX B-1 7, 8
NTTR 7 BW 9 BS TX B-1 7, 8
NTTR USAFWS 16 WPS NV F-16 2--13
NTTR USAFWS 17 WPS NV F-15E 2--9
NTTR USAFWS 26 WPS NV MQ-1 1--2
NTTR USAFWS 26 WPS NV MQ-9 1--4
NTTR USAFWS 66 WPS NV A-10 1--22
NTTR USAFWS 66 WPS NV JTAC 1--8
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 121
NTTR USAFWS 77 WPS TX B-1 7, 8
NTTR USAFWS 57 WPS NJ C-17 1--3, 6, 8--13
NTTR USAFWS 29 WPS AR C-130 10--13
NTTR USAFWS 325 WPS MO B-2 1, 3, 4, 7
NTTR USAFWS 340 WPS LA B-52 1--9
NTTR USAFWS 509 WPS WA KC-135 1--2
NTTR 2 BW 11 BS LA B-52 9
NTTR 2 BW 20 BS LA B-52 9
NTTR 2 BW 96 BS LA B-52 1--3, 9
NTTR 5 BW 23 BS ND B-52 1--3
NTTR 5 BW 69 BS ND B-52 1, 6, 9
NTTR 307 BW 93 BS LA B-52 6, 9
NTTR 307 BW 343 BS LA B-52 9
NTTR 62 AW 4 AS WA C-17 4, 7--13
NTTR 62 AW 7 AS WA C-17 4, 7--13
NTTR 62 AW 8 AS WA C-17 4, 7--13
NTTR 62 AW 10 AS WA C-17 4, 7--13
NTTR 437 AW 14 AS SC C-17 4, 7--12
NTTR 437 AW 15 AS SC C-17 4, 7--12
NTTR 437 AW 16 AS SC C-17 4, 7--12
NTTR 437 AW 17 AS SC C-17 4, 7--12
NTTR 317 AG 39 AS TX C-130 7--10
NTTR 317 AG 40 AS TX C-130 7--10
A4.24. Poinsett Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Poinsett 20 FW 55 FS SC F-16 3--10
122 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
Poinsett 20 FW 77 FS SC F-16 3--10
Poinsett 20 FW 79 FS SC F-16 3--10
Poinsett 552 ACW 960 ACS OK E-3 1
Poinsett 552 ACW 963 ACS OK E-3 1
Poinsett 552 ACW 964 ACS OK E-3 1
Poinsett 552 ACW 965 ACS OK E-3 1
Poinsett 552 ACW 966 ACS OK E-3 1, 2
Poinsett 440 AW 95 AS NC C-130 1--6, 8, 10--13
Poinsett 93
AGOW
682 ASOS SC JTAC 1--8
A4.25. Polygone Electronic Warfare Site Assigned Users and Training Events. Note:
Polygone supports numerous international units from home station and multiple events from
deployed locations.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Polygone
EWS
52 FW 480 FS Germany F-16 10, 13
Polygone
EWS
86 AW 37 AS Germany C-130 8, 10
A4.26. Razorback Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Razorback 314 AW AR C-130 1--7
Razorback 19 AW 41 AS AR C-130 1--7
Razorback 19 AW 50 AS AR C-130 1--7
Razorback 19 AW 61 AS AR C-130 1--7
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 123
A4.27. Shelby Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Shelby 172 AW 183 AS MS C-17 1--6
Shelby 187 FW 100 FS AL F-16 3--9
Shelby 403 AW 815 AS MS C-130 1--7
Shelby 165 AW 158 AS GA C-130 1--5, 11--13
A4.28. Smoky Hill Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Smoky Hill 132 FW 124 FS IA F-16 3--9
Smoky Hill 138 FW 125 FS OK F-16 3--9
Smoky Hill 139 AW 180 AS MO C-130 1--7
Smoky Hill 442 FW 303 FS MO A-10 1--15
Smoky Hill 93
AGOW
10 ASOS KS JTAC 1--8
Smoky Hill 93
AGOW
19 ASOS KY JTAC 1--8
Smoky Hill 2 BW 11 BS LA B-52 4, 5, 7
Smoky Hill 2 BW 20 BS LA B-52 1--7
Smoky Hill 5 BW 23 BS ND B-52 5, 7
Smoky Hill 307 BW 93 BS LA B-52 1, 3, 5, 7
Smoky Hill 307 BW 343 BS LA B-52 5, 7, 8
Smoky Hill 509 BW 394 CTS MO B-2 2, 6, 7
Smoky Hill 53 WG 72 TES MO B-2 4, 7
Smoky Hill USAFWS 29 WPS AR C-130 1--8
124 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
A4.29. Snyder Electronic Warfare Site Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Snyder 7 BW 9 BS TX B-1 5, 6
Snyder 7 BW 28 BS TX B-1 5, 6
Snyder 53 WG 337 TES TX B-1 5, 6
Snyder USAFWS 77 WPS TX B-1 5, 6
Snyder 2 BW 96 BS LA B-52 8
Snyder 307 BW 93 BS LA B-52 8
Snyder 136 AW 181 AS TX C-130 8
A4.30. Torishima Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
A4.31. Townsend Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Townsend 169 FW 157 FS SC F-16 2--10, 12
Townsend 165 AW 158 AS GA C-130 6, 8
A4.32. Utah Test & Training Range (UTTR) Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
UTTR 28 BW 34 BS SD B-1 1--4
UTTR 28 BW 37 BS SD B-1 1--4
UTTR 388 FW 4 FS UT F-16 2--10
UTTR 388 FW 421 FS UT F-16 2--10
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 125
UTTR 388 FW 34 FS UT F-35 1--11
UTTR 53 WG 337 TES TX B-1 2
UTTR USAFWS 77 WPS TX B-1 2
UTTR 7 BW 9 BS TX B-1 2
UTTR 7 BW 28 BS TX B-1 2
UTTR 2 BW 11 BS LA B-52 1, 3, 6
UTTR 2 BW 96 BS LA B-52 4--7
UTTR 5 BW 69 BS ND B-52 2, 3
UTTR 307 BW 343 BS LA B-52 1, 3, 6
UTTR 113 BW 110 BS MO B-2 1, 3--5, 7
UTTR 509 BW 13 BS MO B-2 1, 3--5, 7
UTTR 509 BW 393 BS MO B-2 1, 3--5, 7
A4.33. Warren Grove Assigned Users and Training Events.
Range Assigned
Unit
(Wing)
Assigned
Unit (Sq)
Location MWS MWS Events
Warren
Grove
113 FW 121 FS MD F-16 3--9
Warren
Grove
175 WG 104 FS MD A-10 1--15
Warren
Grove
177 FW 119 FS NJ F-16 3--9
126 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
Attachment 5
RANGE PERSONNEL TRAINING
A5.1. General Training. All personnel assigned to the range will be trained in or demonstrate
adequate knowledge of the following subjects:
A5.1.1. Local range operating procedures.
A5.1.2. Maintenance procedures and issues.
A5.1.3. Range stewardship (environmental awareness and protection)
A5.1.4. Hazardous Materials/Hazardous Waste and local environmental procedures.
A5.1.5. Poisonous or dangerous fauna and flora.
A5.1.6. Local weather hazards.
A5.1.7. Range fire protection/fire suppression procedures.
A5.1.8. Aircraft crash procedures.
A5.1.9. Local safety, emergency, and contingency procedures.
A5.1.10. Basic first aid procedures.
A5.1.11. Explosive and other ordnance hazards (EOD safety briefing).
A5.1.12. Range access control and security procedures.
A5.2. Range Operations Officer Training. As a minimum, the ROO should be trained in or
demonstrate adequate knowledge of the following publications or subjects (Test sites not
conducting air operations are exempt for the items indicated by *):
A5.2.1. Wing scheduling.
A5.2.2. QAE (phase I & II) training. (N/A for ANG)
A5.2.3. Unit Level On-Scene Mishap Investigation Commander.
A5.2.4. NEPA training.
A5.2.5. Risk Communication training.
A5.2.6. AFI 11-202, Volume 3, General Flight Rules.*
A5.2.7. AFI 11-214, Air Operations Rules and Procedures.*
A5.2.8. Aircraft specific AFI 11-2MDS series.*
A5.2.9. Unimproved landing zone and drop zone operations, as applicable.*
A5.2.10. Local airspace configuration.
A5.2.11. AFI 13-212, as supplemented.
A5.2.12. Approved Range Construction and Maintenance Methods.
A5.2.13. Intermediate command instructions and manuals applicable to range “operations”.
A5.2.14. RCO authority and responsibilities.
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 127
A5.2.15. Range Utilization Report/Range record keeping.
A5.2.16. EOD briefing on the proper handling of training munitions.
A5.2.17. USO or designated LSO training.
A5.2.18. WDZ and SDZ Program training.
A5.2.19. Proper use and handling of applicable ground launched visual threats.
A5.3. Range Control Officer / Test Area Control Officer Training. As a minimum, the
RCO/TACO should be trained in or demonstrate adequate knowledge of the following
publications or subjects (Test sites not conducting air operations are exempt for the items
indicated by *):
A5.3.1. Wing scheduling.
A5.3.2. Unit Level On-Scene Mishap Investigation Commander.
A5.3.3. Public Affairs training.
A5.3.4. AFI 11-202, Volume 3, General Flight Rules.*
A5.3.5. AFI 11-214, Air Operations Rules and Procedures.*
A5.3.6. Aircraft specific AFI 11-2MDS series.*
A5.3.7. Unimproved landing zone and drop zone operations, as applicable.*
A5.3.8. Local airspace configuration.
A5.3.9. AFI 13-212, as supplemented.
A5.3.10. Intermediate command instructions and manuals applicable to range “operations”.
A5.3.11. RCO/TACO authority and responsibilities.
A5.3.12. Day/night aircraft ordnance delivery patterns for all aircraft using the range.*
A5.3.13. Obtain and interpret weather observations.
A5.3.14. Required weather minimums for each event.
A5.3.15. Use of the Avian Hazard Advisory System (AHAS, http://www.usahas.com).*
A5.3.16. Foul criteria.
A5.3.17. Communications procedures.
A5.3.18. Capabilities and limitations of range facilities.
A5.3.19. Hazard Areas, pattern safety, WDZ, SDZ, and overall range safety.
A5.3.20. Range Utilization Report/Range record keeping.
A5.3.21. EOD briefing on the proper handling of training munitions.
A5.3.22. Night operations.
A5.3.23. NVD training (if applicable) to include: human visual system, physiological issues,
NVD adjustment, care, use and limitations, disorientation, and aircrew limitations as a
minimum.
128 AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015
A5.3.24. Proper use and handling of applicable ground launched visual threats.
A5.3.25. On-range Training. A qualified RCO/ROO will supervise on-range RCO training.
A qualified TACO/RCO/ROO will supervise test site TACO training. The ROA will
develop a checklist to ensure complete and professional training. Emphasize the use of
sound judgment and common sense while controlling both aircraft and personnel during
range operations. The on-range training should include the following items as a minimum:
A5.3.25.1. Range Hazard Areas.
A5.3.25.2. Inspection of strafe Impact Areas.*
A5.3.25.3. Range fire protection/fire suppression procedures.
A5.3.25.4. Aircraft crash procedures.*
A5.3.25.5. First Aid and evacuation of injured personnel.
A5.3.25.6. Traffic conflict with other ranges in the area.
A5.3.25.7. Range pattern spacing.
A5.3.25.8. Minimum altitude measuring devices.
A5.3.25.9. Cease fire distance estimation for low angle strafe.*
A5.3.25.10. Foul criteria and procedures.
A5.3.25.11. Bomb plotting and electronic strafe scoring equipment.*
A5.3.25.12. Radio, other communications, and tape recorder operation.
A5.3.25.13. Lost communications procedures.
A5.3.25.14. Overall range safety.
A5.3.25.15. Night, laser, and tactical range operations (if applicable).
A5.3.25.16. Training on WDZ and SDZ tool applications
A5.3.25.17. Proper use and handling of applicable ground launched visual threats.
A5.4. Range Training Officer (RTO) Training. As a minimum, the RTO will be trained in or
demonstrate adequate knowledge of the following publications or subjects:
A5.4.1. AFI 11-202, Volume 3, General Flight Rules.
A5.4.2. AFI 11-214, Air Operations Rules and Procedures.
A5.4.3. Aircraft specific AFI 11-2MDS series.
A5.4.4. AFI 13-212, as supplemented.
A5.4.5. Intermediate command instructions and manuals applicable to range “operations”.
A5.4.6. RTO authority and responsibilities.
A5.4.7. Capabilities and limitations of ACTS facilities.
A5.5. Electronic Warfare (EW) Personnel Training. As a minimum, the EW personnel
(Government or Contracted Support) will be trained in or demonstrate adequate knowledge of
the following publications or subjects:
AFI13-212V1 23 APRIL 2015 129
A5.5.1. AFI 11-202, Volume 3, General Flight Rules.
A5.5.2. AFI 11-214, Air Operations Rules and Procedures.
A5.5.3. Aircraft specific AFI 11-2MDS series.
A5.5.4. Aircraft specific RAP tasking messages or Volume 1 training requirements.
A5.5.5. AFI 13-212, as supplemented (applicable sections).
A5.5.6. Intermediate command instructions and manuals applicable to range “operations”.
A5.5.7. Local EW Equipment operating restrictions.
A5.5.8. Capabilities and limitations of ACTS facilities.
A5.5.9. Range safety.
A5.5.10. EW equipment operating procedures for the applicable range equipment.
A5.5.11. Current scenarios/equipment uses and aircrew-developed timelines as directed by
the ROA.