c enter for r esearch on the c ontext of teaching high school professional communities: implications...
TRANSCRIPT
Center for Research on the Context of Teaching
High School Professional Communities: Implications for
Educational Practice
Joan Talbert
Stanford University
Center for Research on the Context of Teaching
CRC’s research on high schools and reform initiatives: 1987-2003
• Sixteen school study (OERI)
• Math department research (NSF)
• Students at the Center evaluation (Wallace-RD)
• Bay Area School Reform Collaborative (Hewlett)
• Bay Area High School Study (Johnson)
• The Learning Partnership (MacArthur)
Center for Research on the Context of Teaching
Themes for discussion
• How high school departments (and, for us middle school departments & elementary grade levels) differ.
• The ways in which those differences matter for students.
Types of Professional Communities
1. Strength and Character of the Teacher Community
a. Weak
b. Strong
2. Culture of Practice
a. Traditional
b. Innovative
School
Weak Teacher Communities
Strong Teacher Communities
Individual values & beliefs Culture of practice
Enact Traditions
Innovate Alone
Traditional Practices
Learning Community
Types of Professional Communities STRENGTH & CHARACTER of
TEACHER COMMUNITY
Weak Community Strong Community
CULTURE OF PRACICE
Traditional Rancho Onyx Ridge Valley Rancho Math Dept Washington Academy
Monroe Highlander Dover La Salle Esperanza
Scholastic
Innovative Ibsen Greenfield Prospect Esperanz Math Dept. Oak Valley Eng. Dept.
The Strength of Department Communities Differs Widely within Comprehensive High Schools: A Case Illustration
The Strength of Department Communities Differs Widely within Comprehensive High Schools: A Case Illustration
Center for Research on the Context of Teaching
Department Community Cultures Differ in Ways Fundamental to Teaching
• Technical culture – conceptions of students, content,
pedagogy and assessment
• Professional norms – collegial relationships and views
on teaching expertise
• Organizational policies – norms for course assignment
and resource allocation
Department Communities Differ in Technical Culture
Professional Community Type
Weak Traditional Community
Strong Traditional Community
Learning Community
Technical Culture
Students Students differ in ability to succeed academically All students can achieve at high academic standards
Student role as learner
Passive role in content learning
Passive role in content learning; Active role in advanced classes
Active role in content learning for all students
Content Text-based subject content Sequential, hierarchical subject topics and skills
Core discipline-based concepts and skills spiraled through curricula
Pedagogy Knowledge transmission;Emphasis on text coverage
Knowledge transmission;Emphasis on teacher lecture
Bridging subject and student knowledge;
Assessment practices
Text-based homework and tests;Curve grading
Special tests for screening and sorting students;Curve grading
Performance assessments using standards-based rubrics;Feedback for improvement
Department Communities Differ in Professional Norms
Professional Community Type
Typical (Weak) Community
Strong Traditional Community
Learning Community
Professional Norms
Collegial relations
Isolation enforced by norm of privacy
Coordination around course tracking and student testing
Collaboration around teaching and learning;
Mentoring/Coaching
Views on teaching expertise
Expertise as developed through private practice and experience
Expertise as based in discipline knowledge and professional status
Expertise as collective, based in knowledge shared and developed through collaboration
Department Communities Differ in Organizational Policies
Professional Community Type
Typical (Weak) Community
Strong Traditional Community
Learning Community
Organization Policies
Teacher course assignment
Prerogative of seniority Teacher tracking by expertise
Course rotation and sharing for equity and teacher learning opportunities
Resource allocation
Tenure-based access to resources
Resource access according to teacher expertise and “track”
Collective definition of resource needs and sources;
Resource creation and sharing
Center for Research on the Context of Teaching
Teacher Learning Community Matters for High School Students’…
• Effort in particular classes/ subjects
• Experience of teacher-student respect
• Role in the classroom
• Class self-efficacy
Students’ School Experiences Reflect their Teachers’ Professional Community
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
InquiryPractices
TeacherLearning
Community
Teacher-Student Respect
Active Student Role in Class
Class Self-Efficacy
Teacher Survey Scale
Student Survey Scale
Corre lation Be tween Student and Teacher Survey Scores
High Schools with Strong Teacher Learning Communities Show Greater Gains on SAT-9
30
40
50
60
70
80
1998 1999 2000 2001
Sch
ool O
vera
ll S
AT
-9 N
PR
Sco
re
School A
School B
School E
School F
School G
Bay AreaSchools
Educational Outcomes
Traditional Communities:
Success with traditional students; limited success with all
students.
Learning Communities:
Success with traditional students; increased
success with nontraditional
students
Center for Research on the Context of Teaching
Through Inquiry and Collaboration, Teacher Learning Communities Develop
Local Knowledge About:
1. Ways in which particular students’ prior knowledge, skills, and culture frame their learning and teaching opportunities
2. How to address diversity in a particular school/ classroom
3. What instructional strategies and materials actively engage students in constructing new knowledge and skills
4. Ways of organizing teachers’ work for professional learning and improvement
Center for Research on the Context of Teaching
Leadership for Learning Community…
• Enforces beliefs that all students and all teachers can learn
• Creates place and times for gathering
• Models and nurtures an “inquiry stance” for teaching
• Develops structures for collaborative work around teaching and student learning
Center for Research on the Context of Teaching
Next Steps…..