c. guney olgun department of civil and environmental engineering, virginia tech thomas a. barham,...

18
C. Guney Olgun Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski, Martin C. Chapman, Adrian Rodriguez-Marek GSA 2015 Baltimore, Maryland 3 November 2015 Seismic Hazard Mapping of the National Capital Region Using Random Field Models

Upload: nelson-edwards

Post on 18-Jan-2016

215 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: C. Guney Olgun Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski, Martin C. Chapman,

C. Guney OlgunDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering,

Virginia Tech

Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski,

Martin C. Chapman, Adrian Rodriguez-Marek

GSA 2015Baltimore, Maryland3 November 2015

Seismic Hazard Mapping of the National Capital Region Using Random Field

Models

Page 2: C. Guney Olgun Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski, Martin C. Chapman,

2011 Mineral Virginia Earthquake

M5.8 Earthquake occurred August 23, 2011 at 1:51pm

Light to moderate damage in DC area, about 130 km away

Regional geological conditions contributed to significant soil amplification

PGA for DC area estimated 0.02-0.03g on rock and 0.06g at soil sites

Page 3: C. Guney Olgun Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski, Martin C. Chapman,

Structural Damage in the Area

National Park Service

M.A. Eddy

Page 4: C. Guney Olgun Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski, Martin C. Chapman,

Atlantic Coastal Plain Geology

(Ator et al. 2005)

Regional geology along the Atlantic coastal plain area dominated by several physiographic provinces

Shallow soils over rock (Piedmont, Fall Line)

Deep tertiary and cretaceous marine deposits over rock (Coastal Plain)

Sharp impedance contrasts between different geologic units (residual, young alluvial, tertiary and cretaceous marine, rock)

Page 5: C. Guney Olgun Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski, Martin C. Chapman,

Washington D.C. Geology

Idealized Subsurface Cross-section for Washington, D.C.0 2 4 km

Horizontal

Legend

Alluvial Soil

Potomac Formation

Residual Soil

Weathered Rock

Rock

Piedmont Fall Line Coastal Plain

Meters

Vertical0

50

100

0 500 1000 1500 20000

10

20

30

40

50

60 Vs (m/s)

Dep

th (

m)

Weathered Rock

Residual

1

0 400 800 1200 16000

20

40

60

80

100 Vs (m/s)

Dep

th (

m)

Alluvial

Potomac Formation

3

1. Piedmont 2. F

all L

ine

3. Coastal Plain

0 500 1000 1500 20000

10

20

30

40

50

60 Vs (m/s)

Dep

th (

m)

2

Alluvial

Residual

Weathered Rock

Page 6: C. Guney Olgun Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski, Martin C. Chapman,

Investigation of Subsurface Geology

38.84

38.88

39.00

38.96

38.92

-76.97

-77.05

-77.13

-77.09

-77.01Longitud

e

Lati

tud

e

Subsurface profiles from about 600 geotechnical investigations

Shear wave velocity profiles from 122 investigations

Artificial neural network (ANN) analysis of the geological profile in the area

Page 7: C. Guney Olgun Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski, Martin C. Chapman,

Geological Cross-Sections (W-E)

38.8559

Distance (km)

-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16E

leva

tion

(m)

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

RockPotomac

Ground Surface

W E

Page 8: C. Guney Olgun Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski, Martin C. Chapman,

38.8880

Distance (km)

-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Ele

vatio

n (

m)

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

Geological Cross-Sections (W-E)

RockPotomac

Ground Surface

W E

Page 9: C. Guney Olgun Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski, Martin C. Chapman,

38.9015

Distance (km)

-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

Ele

vatio

n (

m)

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

Geological Cross-Sections (W-E)

Rock Potomac

Ground Surface

38.9423

Distance (km)

-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16E

leva

tion

(m)

-50

0

50

100

150

W E

Page 10: C. Guney Olgun Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski, Martin C. Chapman,

-77.0051

Distance (km)

-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Ele

vatio

n (

m)

-200

-150

-100

-50

0

50

100

150

Geological Cross-Sections (S-N)

RockPotomac

Ground Surface

S N

Page 11: C. Guney Olgun Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski, Martin C. Chapman,

-77.0936

Distance (km)

-1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Ele

vatio

n (m

)-50

0

50

100

150

Geological Cross-Sections (S-N)

Rock

Ground Surface

S N

Page 12: C. Guney Olgun Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski, Martin C. Chapman,

Vs Measurements of Geological Units

Page 13: C. Guney Olgun Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski, Martin C. Chapman,

Random Field Modeling

Page 14: C. Guney Olgun Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski, Martin C. Chapman,

Period (sec)

0.01 0.1 1 10

Spe

ctra

l Rat

io

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Period (sec)0.01 0.1 1 10

Spe

ctra

l Acc

ele

ratio

n (g

)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5BedrockGround Surface

Piedmont Site : 2nd District Police Station

(courtesy T. Pratt and S. Hough)

Spectral ratio (ground surface to rock)

Fa =2.80

Fv =0.94

Shear Wave Velocity (m/s)0 400 800 1200 1600 2000

De

pth

(m)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Frequency (Hz)0.1 1 10 100

Spe

ctra

l Rat

io

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Stiff shallow site Residual soils (~15 m thick)

underlain by rock Fundamental frequency 4.5

Hz

Residual Soil

Weathered Rock

Page 15: C. Guney Olgun Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski, Martin C. Chapman,

Period (sec)0.01 0.1 1 10

Spe

ctra

l Acc

eler

atio

n (g

)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

BedrockGround Surface

Fall Line Site : 1328 14th St. NW

(courtesy T. Pratt and S. Hough)Period (sec)

0.01 0.1 1 10

Spe

ctra

l Rat

io

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Fa =2.68 Fv =2.65

Shear Wave Velocity (m/s)0 200 400 600 800 10001200

De

pth

(m)

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

Spectral ratio (ground surface to rock)

Period (sec)

0.01 0.1 1 10

Spe

ctra

l Rat

io

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Fa =2.45

Fv =0.90

Frequency (Hz)0.1 1 10 100

Spe

ctra

l Rat

io

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Stiff site Alluvial and residual soils (~19

m thick) underlain by rock Fundamental frequency 5.0

Hz

Alluvial Soil

Weathered Rock

Page 16: C. Guney Olgun Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski, Martin C. Chapman,

Coastal Plain Site : Washington Monument

Frequency (Hz)0.1 1 10 100

Spe

ctra

l Rat

io

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

(courtesy T. Pratt and S. Hough)

Shear Wave Velocity (m/s)0 200 400 600 800 10001200

Dep

th (

m)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

(courtesy R. Kayen)

Period (sec)

0.01 0.1 1 10

Spe

ctra

l Rat

io

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Fa =2.68 Fv =2.65

Period (sec)0.01 0.1 1 10

Spe

ctra

l Acc

eler

atio

n (g

)

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5BedrockGround Surface

Spectral ratio (ground surface to rock)

Alluvial Soil and Potomac

Formation

Weathered Rock

Deep alluvial and Potomac formation (~60 m thick) underlain by rock

Fundamental frequency 1.5 Hz

Page 17: C. Guney Olgun Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski, Martin C. Chapman,

Summary and Conclusions

Vs30 (m/s)

200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200

Fa

- S

hort

Per

iod

Am

plifi

catio

n F

acto

r

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

PiedmontFall LineCoastal Plain

IBC

DC B

Fa (0.1-0.5 sec)

Vs30 (m/s)

200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200Fv

- M

id-t

o-Lo

ng P

erio

d A

mpl

ifica

tion

Fac

tor

0

1

2

3

4

5

IBC

D C B

Fv (0.4-2.0 sec)

D.C. area geology exhibits sharp impedance contrasts that can significantly amplify ground motions

Subsurface profile mapped from extensive field data and ANN Limited information on regional velocity structure and relevant

properties (Q, k) (Hashash et al. 2013)

Page 18: C. Guney Olgun Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech Thomas A. Barham, Morgan A. Eddy, Mark Tilashalski, Martin C. Chapman,

Acknowledgements

NEHRP Earthquake Hazards Program award numbers G10AP00035, G13AP00076, G15AP00047

PiedmontGeotechnical, Inc.

Seismometer measurements from D.C. area provided by Dr. Tom Pratt and Dr. Susan Hough (Poster Session 293, Exhibits Hall, 4 November 2015)

Washington Monument seismic profile provided by Dr. Robert Kayen, USGS

Washington D.C. area geotechnical and shear wave velocity data provided by