C-PLUS PROJECTWORLD-CLASS CLUSTERS

IN CENTRAL EUROPE

PP4: Campus 02

Status on Multilingual Register16th April 2012

Prague, Czech Republic

RECAP: REQUIREMENTS FROM JAN. 19TH (I)

Project partner description (1 p / PP) Cluster management & region (1 p / cluster or region) Innovation leaders (1 p / leader = 3 pp / cluster)

field of activity operative headquarters website number of employees year of foundation “special characteristic“ a short statement regarding a topic of C-PLUS interest such as

innovation, collaboration, etc. best practices

RECAP: REQUIREMENTS FROM JAN. 19TH (II)

Text length of each page should not exceed 1800 characters without spaces or 2000 characters including whitespaces

Short company statement: up to 100 characters without spaces

Graphics: 1 logo / page 1-2 photos / page all images and logos in printable quality

I3SME example register attached

CONTENTS PP1/PP2 (I)

Entire material received Length restrictions met Company profiles consistent with specification Comments on graphical material:

Logos of footwear and packaging cluster (pending designer feedback Apr. 13th 3pm)

Better resolution: logo Castellani Comments on textual material:

Company slogans: too general or not in C-PLUS focus (Bottazzi, CBR, Tacchificio)

Company profiles: what makes them innovation leaders? CBR seems okay

CONTENTS PP1/PP2 (II) F.lli Fico, Filippini, Tacchificio have, at least, briefly mentioned

innovation and r&d Remaining profiles say little about the innovation behaviour (do the

firms collaborate, do they force knowledge exchange?)

CONTENTS PP3 (I)

Majority of material received Missing: data on 3 companies

Length restrictions predominantly met Company profiles not entirely consistent with

specification Comments on graphical material:

Better resolution: logo oabb, logo and image Unitechnik (pending designer feedback Apr. 13th 3pm)

Comments on textual material: Exceeding text length: profi.metal cluster Exceeding slogan length: all 3 profiles, but perfect in content Suggestion: 100 character extraction and re-

formation of the statements as “normal” text

CONTENTS PP3 (II)

Missing company activity and “special characteristic”: in all 3 cases

CONTENTS PP4 (I)

Entire material received Length restrictions predominantly met Company profiles consistent with specification Comments on graphical material:

Better resolution: image Convergent (pending designer feedback Apr. 13th 3pm)

Comments on textual material: Exceeding text length: GW St. Pölten, M&R Exceeding slogan length: 4 out of 6, but perfect in content Company activity and “special characteristic”: too much text

(GW St. Pölten, M&R, PLS)

CONTENTS PP5 (I)

Almost half of the material received Missing: data on 5 companies; Thermal cluster image

Length restrictions met halfway through Company profiles not entirely consistent with

specification Comments on graphical material:

Received graphics (pending designer feedback Apr. 13th 3pm)

Comments on textual material: Exceeding text length: Thermal cluster, Büki Exceeding slogan length: Kehida Missing company activity and “special

characteristic”: in both cases

CONTENTS PP5 (II)

Company slogans: both too general or not in C-PLUS focus Company profiles: what makes them innovation leaders?

profiles say little about the innovation behaviour (do the firms collaborate, do they force knowledge exchange?)

CONTENTS PP6 (I)

Entire material received Length restrictions predominantly met Company profiles not entirely consistent with

specification Comments on graphical material:

Better resolution: logo Invea, picture SovaNet Suggestion: an alternative image from Adva ICT (original

image is overlong and only a snippet might be included) as well as CVVI

Comments on textual material: Exceeding text length: furniture cluster,

SovaNet (simply eliminate last sentence) Exceeding slogan length: DDL

CONTENTS PP6 (II)

Missing company activity: Adva ICT, Unis Missing short “special characteristic”: all 6 profiles C-PLUS slogans:

Nadop, Adva ICT, Unis are missing Remaining ones do not contain a C-PLUS statement

Company profiles: what makes them innovation leaders? Invea seems okay SovaNet, at least, briefly mentioned knowledge and technology

transfer through e.g. trend monitoring, conference participation Remaining profiles say little about the innovation behaviour (do the

firms collaborate, do they force knowledge exchange, what make them innovation leaders?)

CONTENTS PP7/8 (I)

Majority of material received Missing: description PP8, company 6, images of FEWE, HVAC

and ECO Length restrictions predominantly met Company profiles not entirely consistent with

specification Comments on graphical material:

Better resolution: entire graphics (pending designer feedback Apr. 13th 3pm for some)

Comments on textual material: Exceeding text length: FEWE Missing slogan, activity, employee number,

“special characteristic”: in all 5 cases

CONTENTS PP7/8 (II)

Company profiles: what makes them innovation leaders? FEWE and SPEC coalitions, sustainable development and using

contacts for meeting customer requirements, at least, briefly mentioned

Remaining profiles say little about the innovation behaviour (do the firms collaborate, do they force knowledge exchange, what make them innovation leaders?)

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!