cal. coalition for families and children v. san diego county ......13 cv 1944 cab blm ccfc master...

Cal. Coalition for Families and Children v. San Diego County Bar Ass'n 13 cv 1944 CAB BLM

CCFC Master Exhs. P665

- angiEmedia - http://angiemedia.com -

Amicus Brief in Emad Tadros v. Stephen Doyne Appeal in San DiegoPosted By Chris on November 23, 2010 | 3 Comments

California Coalition for Families and Children [1] and activist attorney Marc Angelucci haverecently published a draft amicus curiae brief for submission to the California Fourth District Courtof Appeal in case D057480, the appeal of the San Diego County Superior Court Case No. 37-2008-00093885-CU-BT-CTL in which Judge Jay Bloom sided with the corrupt family law courtsand disreputable Dr. Stephen Doyne, one of the court’s favored 730 child custody evaluators, byruling that Doyne is immune from suit and one of his victims, Dr. Emad Tadros, should pay hislegal fees.

Dr. Emad Tadros caught Stephen Doyne using what are credibly alleged to be fraudulentcredentials issued by a “diploma mill” style organization. Evidence of this is shown indocumentation regarding Doyne’s credentials [2]. This is just the tip of the iceberg in thegrowing allegations against Doyne and many other San Diego divorce industry profiteers.

The Public Court [3] features a helpful write-up of the credentialing con involving Doyne andother custody evaluators purchasing credentials from diploma mills [4] in what appears to be aplan to enhance their reputations as expert witnesses and psychological evaluators. This is notjust a San Diego problem, it is nationwide.

CCFC and Angelucci are looking for members of the public who understand the abusive conductof many of the 730 custody evaluators in San Diego County to sign the brief in support of thenotion that nobody should be above the law, not even the divorce industry “professionals”favored by the corrupt judicial officers on the bench in San Diego.

Angelucci explains the current dire situation in the letter soliciting public support for the brief.

Currently Dr. Doyne and other 730 evaluators like him, act with impunity in thefamily law courts in the name of profit, at the expense of destruction of children andfamilies. They hide under the umbrella of the Anti-SLAPP statute pursuant to Code ofCivil Procedure 425.16 and the Litigation Privilege found in Civil Code 47. Thesestatutes have created a legal road block to obtain accountability of such offenders.While freedom of speech is a fundamental right and privilege, it cannot be sobroadly interpreted to deny litigants in the family law courts so similarly situated tobe denied their right to parent and other fundamental rights, that by their verynature became illegal as a matter of law. The underlying case was brought in thename of the public good, which would legally preclude the application of protectedspeech under Code of Civil Procedure 425.16 and open the door for litigants sosimilarly situated and affected by the illegal 730 process, which was neverauthorized by law as it is a fact that the San Diego County Superior Court failed tofollow or enforce the mandatory Rules of Court for nearly a decade. These facts arewell contained in the Amicus Curiae. Further discovery was denied in the underlyingcase, which denied the ability to demonstrate evidence that would conclusively, andwithout doubt establish, that the assertedly protected speech was illegal as amatter of law, and further that Dr. Doyne had no attachment to the litigation, as hewas not an authorized participant of law by failure to adhere to the mandatoryRules of Court, that are not neither permissive or laissez-faire; they are mandatoryin their strongest legal terms. This denied the case to prove that Plaintiff in theunderlying action, was representing members of the public that would cause toenforce an important right “affecting the public interest, and would confer asignificant benefit, whether pecuniary or nonpecuniary, on the general public or alarge class of persons.” This is why the Amicus Curiae is pivotal to carving out anexception that would take on new legal dimensions as related in the family lawcourts, where there is no jury of ones peers to act as trier of facts. The judge actsboth as trier of fact and law, delegating its power to 730 evaluators like StephenDoyne and others, while denying each citizen and every litigant to be governed bythe law where someone else like Stephen Doyne decides the case or an issuebefore him.

Recommend Send 57 people recommend this. Be the first of your friends.



The draft brief goes on to explain how San Diego court officials including Judge Lorna Alksne andMichael Roddy have systematically violated the law regarding custody evaluations for severalyears and then endeavored to spin away their responsibility and cover up extensive misconductby their friends and them.

Superior Court Administrative Michael Roddy, Presiding Judge Lorna Alksne andothers have become completely obstructive in that they refuse to acknowledge theharm done to the individual litigants or the litigants as a cognizable group that nowbrings this matter to the attention of the court for redress and relief in the name ofthe public good and public interest.

The family law court, the 730 Evaluator’s and the family law attorneys haveindividually and as a group refused to inform the effected and illegallydisenfranchised litigants that their legal rights may have been illegally impairedthough no fault of their own. That a condition of possible legal malpractice andviolations by the 730 Evaluator’s, like Doyne are open for review and recovery fordamages suffered, because the litigation privilege does not attach nor does theAnti- SLAPP Suit Protections.

You might not have stepped foot in a corrupt family court, but millions of others in the US andother nations have. San Diego’s courts are among the most polluted with corrupt judges andtheir friends. The county’s judges and other officials brazenly violate the law and dishonestlyassert that their victims are responsible for the harm they experience as a result. Please helpsupport San Diego families and consider signing this brief to support CCFC’s quest to make thecourts follow the law and to stop their malicious friends from hurting children and families to earnmoney for their next swimming pool or luxury car.

You can preview and download the draft brief and signature letter below.



SHOW ME MORE LIKE CCFC DRAFT AMICUS BRIEF FOR EMADTADROS V. STEPHEN DOYNESIMILAR TO CCFC DRAFT AMICUS BRIEF FOR EMAD TADROS V.STEPHEN DOYNEBACK TO DOCExplore more like CCFC Draft Amicus Brief for Emad Tadros v. StephenDoynePrevious | NextAppellate Court ValidatesDr. Stephen DoyneCredentials, ExperienceDr Stephen E Doyne

More from Angela AngiemediaPrevious | NextMcBrien_01-05-10Angela AngiemediaMcBrien 04-25-02

CCFC Draft Amicus Brief for Emad Tadros v. Stephen Doyne [5]

You can also download the document from Google Docs [6] or as a PDF file [7].

Further Reading

San Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Resigns Under Fire, Yet Shows CJP Is Corrupt [8]

San Diego Custody Evaluators Generate Cash Flow by Victimizing Families Using RestrainingOrders [9]Cal. Coalition for Families and Children v. San Diego County Bar Ass'n 13 cv 1944 CAB BLM


Judge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home Picketed [10]

A Judge’s View of “Best Interests of the Children” [11]

Cole Stuart Considers $10M False Arrest Suit Against SDCBA [12]

CCFC Family Law Protest in San Diego Results in Arrest of Group Leader [13]

Judge Lorna Alksne Eager For New Weapons For Judicial Abuse [14]

CCFC Protests San Diego Family Courts on April 15, 2010 [15]

Bill Gore Is Poor Choice For San Diego Sheriff [16]

San Diego DA Bonnie Dumanis Attempts to Pervert Justice [17]

Reader Feedback on San Diego Judge Lisa Schall [18]

Why Is San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench? [19]

Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct [20]

Flyer Protest in San Diego Family Law Courts [21]

San Diego Courts Cover Up Missing Forms and Psych Evals [22]

Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire [23]

Please sign the Amicus Brief ASAP [24]

3 Comments To "Amicus Brief in Emad Tadros v. Stephen Doyne Appealin San Diego"

#1 Comment By Madcolor On December 1, 2010 @ 3:56 pm

Stephen Doyne, Divorces Inc.

#2 Comment By Emad Tadros MD and the Chronically Cheated Public At Large On December 16,2010 @ 8:21 pm

On 4-15-10 I stated in public, to Judge Bloom that FL326 is mandated to be filed “Under ThePenalty of Perjury.” On this form, a verified signature by the evaluator is mandated according toRule 5.225 k-1-b, which states in BOLD that this form must be filled out and signed “Under ThePenalty of Perjury” 10 days “BEFORE-BEFORE” ANY custody work starts, by any evaluator.

The ethical, legal and professional instructions from the SDCBA to all San Diego attorneys, whoare supposed to care about the child Best Interest, is to never touch any old cases as it is illegalon its face and according to the clear cut mandate outlined by 5.225 k-1-b.

As a matter of fact filing these forms after the fact is only committing perjury in day-light.

Any layman would wonder: was this prompting to flagrantly violate CRC, serve the public orserve the Attorneys?

Was this about Child’s Best Interest or was it about taking the candy out of the kids mouth andkeep the attorneys sucking on it, instead?

PLEASE READ AND EXAMINE WHAT WAS ALREADY FILED PUBLIC AND NOW OUTLINED IN THEPENDING TO BE FILED AMIUCS…….Cal. Coalition for Families and Children v. San Diego County Bar Ass'n 13 cv 1944 CAB BLM


—– Forwarded Message —–From: [25]

To: [26]

Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 12:34:31 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada PacificSubject: Email from Robert Lesh to Family Law Community

Emad,

Below is a forwarded email I received from an anonymous source who is a member of the SanDiego Family Law community. I was told that this email was sent as a mass emailing to allmembers of the San Diego County Bar Association who practice in family law. I had originallyreceived this email in early October of 2009 and as you recall, had forwarded it to you andvarious other members of the ‘Doyned’ community at that time.

If required, I can and will testify under oath as to the conditions that I received thiscommunication under and the integrity of the individual who forwarded this document to me andhis/her professional affiliation (a practicing member of the family law section of the San Diego BarAssociation) in order that you can legally establish the veracity of this document with the courts.

Regards!John van Doorn—————————————————————————–

Robert Lesh [mailto:[email protected]]Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 5:19 PMTo: SDCBA Family Law SectionSubject: [sdcbafamilylaw] Important Custody Evaluation Forms/Orders

SDCBA Community Message Sent by: W. Lesh. To reply privately to W. Lesh,Click Here

Note: By replying to this message, your response will be e-maileddirectly to the individual sender. Click “Reply to All” in your e-mailclient to send your response to all SDCBA Family Law Section membersinstantly. This is a PRIVATE list for members of the SDCBA’s Family LawSection. Do not forward messages or post confidential case or clientdata on this list server. For a list of SDCBA list serve guidelines,click here.

To permanently unsubscribe from this listserve, Click Here

I have been advised that a press conference occurred today (October 1)which involved the issue of custody evaluations and the submission tothe Court of the attached Family Law Forms 326 and 327. As you may beaware from a prior e-mail I sent to all of you, these forms aremandatory and have been now for some time. Whenever you are involved ina custody evaluation matter, you need to make sure that your custodyevaluators sign form FL-326 and that that gets filed with the Court, asthere is a strong possibility that the custody evaluator will not bepaid for work that they perform prior to the form being signed andsubmitted to the Court.

As to Family Law 327, that also needs to be signed and contained in thecase file.

It seems apparent that there is going to be a tremendous amount ofscrutiny being placed upon these forms and if you have any old casesstill pending where these forms have not been used, please make surethat they are filed appropriately as you risk claims from your clientthat the matter was not properly handled, if they later disagree withthe recommendations from the evaluator.

If you have any particular questions regarding this, feel free tocontact me.

Bob LeshCFLS Chair__.___._



ABOUT THIS MESSAGE FROM THE FAMILY LAW SECTION

You are a receiving this email as a member of the San Diego County BarAssociation’s Family Law Section. This email was generated through alistserve, and does not represent the views of the San Diego County BarAssociation, or the San Diego County Bar Association’s Family LawSection. To adjust your list delivery settings and subscription optionsfor all SDCBA list servers and communities, Click Here.

NOTE: By replying to this message, you will be replying to theindividual sender. Click “Reply to All” to send your message to allmembers of the Family Law Section

To send your own message, send email to[27]

To permanently unsubscribe from the Family Law Section listserve, ClickHere._.___.__

#3 Comment By Cole Stuart On May 24, 2013 @ 3:16 pm

I’ve posted a detailed review and opened a discussion board at [28]. Parents are welcome tojoin the discussion and exhange tips/advice/experiences about Doyne or any of the otherproblematic San Diego Custody Evaluators. Please: Parents Only and focus on positivesuggstions/advice rather than trashing him. There’s plenty of that already online.

Best!

Cole Stuart

Article printed from angiEmedia: http://angiemedia.com

URL to article: http://angiemedia.com/2010/11/23/amicus-brief-in-emad-tadros-v-stephen-doyne-appeal-in-san-diego/

URLs in this post:

[1] California Coalition for Families and Children: http://ccfconline.net[2] documentation regarding Doyne’s credentials: http://angiemedia.com/case-files/stephen-doyne-files/[3] The Public Court: http://thepubliccourt.com[4] credentialing con involving Doyne and other custody evaluators purchasing credentials fromdiploma mills: http://www.custodyevaluators.thepubliccourt.com/[5] CCFC Draft Amicus Brief for Emad Tadros v. Stephen Doyne:http://www.scribd.com/doc/43713949/CCFC-Draft-Amicus-Brief-for-Emad-Tadros-v-Stephen-Doyne[6] Google Docs:https://docs.google.com/document/d/18B7Ted20GgyRVGRChvJRXqZSHKTRRjuNyxA2UVWiDfg/edit?hl=en&pli=1#[7] PDF file: http://angiemedia.com/files/Courts/SigntheAmicusBriefReTadrosvDoyne.pdf[8] San Diego Judge DeAnn Salcido Resigns Under Fire, Yet Shows CJP Is Corrupt:http://angiemedia.com/2010/11/11/san-diego-judge-deann-salcido-resigns-under-fire-yet-shows-cjp-is-corrupt/[9] San Diego Custody Evaluators Generate Cash Flow by Victimizing Families Using RestrainingOrders: http://angiemedia.com/2010/10/05/san-diego-custody-evaluators-generate-cash-flow-by-victimizing-families-using-restraining-orders/[10] Judge Lorna Alksne On The Way Out After Home Picketed:http://angiemedia.com/2010/07/08/judge-lorna-alksne-on-the-way-out-after-home-picketed/[11] A Judge’s View of “Best Interests of the Children”: http://angiemedia.com/2010/07/06/a-judges-view-of-best-interests-of-the-children/[12] Cole Stuart Considers $10M False Arrest Suit Against SDCBA:



http://angiemedia.com/2010/04/30/cole-stuart-considers-10m-false-arrest-suit-against-sdcba/[13] CCFC Family Law Protest in San Diego Results in Arrest of Group Leader:http://angiemedia.com/2010/04/16/ccfc-family-law-protest-in-san-diego-results-in-arrest-of-group-leader/[14] Judge Lorna Alksne Eager For New Weapons For Judicial Abuse:http://angiemedia.com/2010/04/22/judge-lorna-alksne-eager-for-new-weapons-for-judicial-abuse/[15] CCFC Protests San Diego Family Courts on April 15, 2010:http://angiemedia.com/2010/04/12/ccfc-protests-san-diego-family-courts-on-april-15-2010/[16] Bill Gore Is Poor Choice For San Diego Sheriff: http://angiemedia.com/2010/04/20/bill-gore-is-poor-choice-for-san-diego-sheriff/[17] San Diego DA Bonnie Dumanis Attempts to Pervert Justice:http://angiemedia.com/2010/02/19/san-diego-da-bonnie-dumanis-attempts-to-pervert-justice/[18] Reader Feedback on San Diego Judge Lisa Schall:http://angiemedia.com/2010/01/25/reader-feedback-on-san-diego-judge-lisa-schall/[19] Why Is San Diego Judge Lisa Schall Still On The Bench?:http://angiemedia.com/2010/01/22/why-is-san-diego-judge-lisa-schall-still-on-the-bench/[20] Eileen Lasher on San Diego CPS/Family Law Court Misconduct:http://angiemedia.com/2009/11/20/eileen-lasher-on-san-diego-cpsfamily-law-court-misconduct/[21] Flyer Protest in San Diego Family Law Courts: http://angiemedia.com/2009/11/20/flyer-protest-in-san-diego-family-law-courts/[22] San Diego Courts Cover Up Missing Forms and Psych Evals:http://angiemedia.com/2009/11/19/san-diego-courts-cover-up-missing-forms-and-psych-evals/[23] Stephen Doyne and San Diego Family Law Courts Under Fire:http://angiemedia.com/2009/11/18/stephen-doyne-and-san-diego-family-law-courts-under-fire/[24] Please sign the Amicus Brief ASAP: http://www.thepubliccourt.com/archives/103[25] : mailto:[email protected][26] : mailto:[email protected][27] : mailto:[email protected][28] : http://croixstuart.blogs…

Copyright © 2010 angiEmedia. All rights reserved.



California Coalition for Families and Children, et al. vs. San Diego County Bar Association, et al,

United States District Court, Southern District of California

Exhibits to Complaint

Exhibit 4



cal. coalition for families and children v. san diego county ......13 cv 1944 cab blm ccfc master...

Documents