california hospital association's petition to confirm arbitration award vs. seiu-uhw 06-16-2016

Upload: tastysternburger

Post on 02-Mar-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/26/2019 California Hospital Association's Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award vs. SEIU-UHW 06-16-2016

    1/8

    10

    12

    14

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    ?7

    F.

    C l i n

    Kirschner. Jr. (State Bar No. 122502)

    MatthewJ.Silveira(State Bar No. 264250)

    Kelsev Israel-Trummel (State Bar No. 282272)

    JONES DAY

    555

    Califomia

    Street. 26th Floor

    San Francisco. CA 94104

    Telephone: (415)626-3939

    Facsimile:

    (415) 875-5700

    Email:

    ck irschner@ J onesDay.com

    msilveira(il JonesDay.com

    kitrummel(@JonesDay.com

    JeffrevA . Levee (State Bar No. 125863)

    JONES DAY

    555 South Flower Street.

    Fif t ieth

    Floor

    Los

    Angeles. CA 90071

    Telephone: (213)489-3939

    Facsimile:

    (213) 243-2539

    Email: jlevee()JonesDay.com

    .Attomevsfor Petitioner

    C A L I F O R N I A

    HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION

    Ms:%'.

    J r

    'ENDORSED

    '2D 6 JUNM6 ?f112:36

    CDSSCCClJRTHOfJSl::

    SL-PEPJOR COUFtT

    OF

    CALIFORHIA

    ;SACRAK';E;MTO;C01INT^I'

    S U P E R I O R C O U R T O F T H E S T . 4 T E O F C A L I F O R N I A

    C O U N T V O F

    S A C R A M E N T O

    C A L I F O R N I A HOSPITAL

    ASSOCIATION.

    Petitioner,

    SEIU,

    U N I T E D HEALTHCAREWORKERS

    -WEST.

    Respondent.

    Case

    No.

    34 2016 00189567

    P E T I T I O N E R C A L I F O R N I A

    H O S P I T A L

    A S S O C I A T I O N S

    N O T I C E

    O F P E T I T I O N TOC O N F I R M

    A R B I T R A T I O N

    A V V A R D ;

    M E M O R . 4 N D U M

    OFP O I N T SAND

    A U T H O R I T I E S

    IN

    S U P P O R T

    T H E R E O F

    [FiledConcurrentlyw i t h Petition to

    Confirm]

    Date:

    Time:

    Dept:

    Judge:

    June24.2016

    2:00 p.m.

    53

    Hon. David

    1.

    Brown

    Scheduled to be heard on shortened time

    pursuant toJune 14. 2016 Order

    Shortening Time

    Petition

    Filed:

    Januarv 26.2016

    CIIA

    NOTICE

    OF PET.TO

    CONFIRM

    . W D M M .OFP&. \ :Case

    No.

    .U-2016-00189567

  • 7/26/2019 California Hospital Association's Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award vs. SEIU-UHW 06-16-2016

    2/8

    1OA LLPAR IES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:

    PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT onJune24. 2016 at 2:00 p.m. inDepartment53

    ofthe

    3

    above-entitled court.

    located;it 720 9thStreet.

    Sacramento.

    Califomia.beforetheHonorable

    4 David 1. Brown,PetitionerCALIFORNIAHOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ("CHA")wi l l , and

    herebydoes,

    petition thc Court to confinn the arbitrationaward

    issued

    and

    serv

    ed onJune6,

    6 2016.

    pursuant

    to Califomia

    Code

    ofCivi l

    Procedure

    section 1285.

    7 CH.A's Petition is

    based

    onthisNotice of Petition, theaccompanyingPetition to Confimi,

    8 theMemorandumofPointsand Authorities, anduponall

    such

    other

    matters

    and

    arguments

    as

    9 may bepresentedto the Court at or prior to thehearingon

    this

    Petition. It is

    scheduled

    to be

    10

    heard

    on

    shortened

    time as provided in theCourt'sJune14. 2016Order,

    attached hereto

    as

    Exhibit A.

    12

    14

    Dated: June 16, 2016 Jones Dav

    15 By: 6 V ' "

    F. Curt Kirschner. Jr.

    16

    Attomeys forPetitioner

    ' CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION

    18

    19

    20

    21

    24

    25

    26

    27

    28

    C H A S NO I K K OF PE I. I O CO N F I R M AND M E M . OF P &A : Cast- No. 34-2016-l)018')567

  • 7/26/2019 California Hospital Association's Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award vs. SEIU-UHW 06-16-2016

    3/8

    1 M E M O R A N D U M

    OF POINTS

    A ND AUTHORITIES

    2 I .

    ST.\TEMENT

    OF FACTS

    3 On March 14. 2016. this Court granted Petitioner

    California

    Ho.spital Association's

    4

    ("CHA")

    Petition to Compel

    Arbitration, finding

    that the parties had entered into a

    valid

    5 arbitration

    agreement

    and ordering

    CHA

    and

    Respondent

    SEIU.

    United Healthcare Workers -

    6 West

    ("UHW")

    to arbitrate their dispute regarding the Hospital Executive Compensation Act of

    7 2016 (the '"2016 Executive Compensation

    Initiative")

    before

    .Arbitrator

    Richard

    L.

    Aheam.

    8 (Order Granting Petition to Compel

    Arbitration

    [Mar.

    14. 2016].) The arbitration hearing

    9 commenced on

    Apr i l

    13, 2016. but was adjoumed on

    Apr i l

    14. 2016 to pennit extensive

    10 discovery. (See Pet. to

    Confinn.

    Attach. 8(c)

    [Award]

    at p. 1.)

    Arbitration

    hearings resumed on

    1 1

    May 6, 2016, and continued on May 7, 11. 12. and 13th. (See

    ibid.) Following

    the close of

    12 evidence, both parties submitted exten.sive post-hearing briefs and

    UHW

    sought and was given

    13 pennission to

    file

    a supplemental reply

    brief (See/t7.

    at pp. 1-2.) OnJune6, 2016, the

    Arbitrator

    14 issued an opinion and partial

    final

    award

    prohibiting UHW

    and itsagents

    from

    pursuing,

    15 sponsoring or supporting the 2016 Executive Compensation

    Initiative,which

    required UHW and

    16 itsagentsto immediately withdraw the 2016 Executive Compensation

    Initiative from

    the ballot

    17

    qualification

    process

    and take any other

    actsnecessary

    to terminate their pursuit, sponsorship, or

    18 support of that

    initiative

    (the

    "Avvard").

    (/

  • 7/26/2019 California Hospital Association's Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award vs. SEIU-UHW 06-16-2016

    4/8

    pany challenging an arbitration award to establish error or impropnety. [Citations.] In the

    absence

    of such a showing there is no

    cause

    to deny

    confirmation

    ofthe award.

    [Citations.]"].)'

    3

    CH.A

    is not aware of any colorable grounds tor vacatur oftheAward.

    .All

    arguments

    4 i bearing any connection to the statutory grounds for \ acating an arbitration award that UHW has

    presented todate have beenrejected by this Court and denied review by the Court of .Appeals or

    6 were thoroughly analyzed and rejected by the

    .Arbitrator.

    (See Order Granting Petition to Compel

    7

    Arbitration [Mar.

    14.

    2016];

    OrderDenyingPetition for

    Writ

    of Mandate

    [Apr.

    8.

    2016]:

    Pet. to

    8

    Contlrtn. Attach.

    8(c)

    [Award]

    at pp. 30-39.)

    9 The fact that theAwardincludes

    injunctiverelief

    doesnotmodifythe presumptive

    10

    standardsfor

    enforcement oftheAvvard. Substantively, an award of

    injunctiverelief

    talis

    w ithin

    I

    1

    an arbitrator's "wide discretion ... to fashionajust remedy,includingequitablereliefthat a court

    12 may not grant, as long as the remedy isrationallyrelated to the contract and the breach."' (Swan

    Magnetics. Inc. v. Superior Court (1997) 56Cal..App.4tli1504. 1511 [citations and internal

    quotation

    marks

    omitted].)

    Thearbitrationagreement in thisca.se

    did

    not place any

    limitations

    on

    15 theArbitrator'sauthority, but in.stead provided that he

    would

    "resolve any disputes over the

    16 application and interpretation of

    [the

    Code]" and

    have"final

    and

    binding

    authority to enforce [the

    17 Code] and resolve

    issues

    that rise

    during"

    its course. (Pet. to

    Conf imi ,

    Attach.

    4(b) [Code of

    18 Conduct] 111(B).) Procedurally, "an arbitrator, in order to provide a proper remedy for,the

    19

    prevailing

    party, may resolve certain

    critical

    areasof

    a

    dispute in a 'partial

    final

    award' but

    20

    reservejurisdiction

    to later decide, by a

    ' f i na l

    award,'

    issueswhich wil l likely

    arise as a result of

    21 the implementation of that remedy.'' (Highiower v.Superior Court (2001) 86Cal.App.4th1415,

    22 1419 [emphasis in

    original].)

    Partial

    final

    awards are immediatelyconfirmable.(/c/. at 1420.)

    23

    24

    25

    26

    '

    CHA

    understandsUHW will

    be

    petitioning

    to

    vacate

    theAward.

    CFIA will

    respond to

    any argumentsmadeinUHW's petitionpursuant to the schedule included in the Court's order

    -8 setting the

    brieiing

    and hearing schedule in this matter.

    2

    CIIA'S

    NOTICE

    OF PET. TO

    CONFIRM

    AND MK.M. OF

    P&TATCase

    No.

    .34-20I6-00189.;67

  • 7/26/2019 California Hospital Association's Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award vs. SEIU-UHW 06-16-2016

    5/8

    15

    16

    17

    18

    19

    20

    21

    22

    23

    24

    25

    26

    28

    1

    Forthese reasons,CHA's PetitiontoConfinnshouldbegranted.

    2

    Dated:June

    16.

    2016

    JONESDAY

    3

    4 1 By:

    _J^Ji2ljS^ ^

    F. Curt Kirschner. Jr

    5

    Attomeys for

    Petitioner

    6 CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION

    7

    S

    9

    10

    12

    13

    14

    CIIA^S

    NOTICEOFPET. TO CONFIRM AND MEM.OFP&A:CaseNo.

    34-2016-00189f?67

  • 7/26/2019 California Hospital Association's Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award vs. SEIU-UHW 06-16-2016

    6/8

    E X H I B I T A

  • 7/26/2019 California Hospital Association's Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award vs. SEIU-UHW 06-16-2016

    7/8

    4 i

    f

    f:

    7 I

    8 I

    a

    9 5

    io i

    12 I

    1 . Curt Kirschner.Jr.(State Bar No.122502

    M.itthe\v j Silveira

    iStaie

    Bar No.

    264250)

    Keiscv

    Israel-Trummel (Sl.nc

    Bar Nu.

    282272)

    JONES D.AY

    555 CalifomiaStreet, 26th Floor

    San Fran cisco. C.A 9410 4

    felephonc:

    (415)626-3939

    F.icsimile: (415)875-5700

    Emai l : ck i rschnerwJonesDay.com

    msilveirai JonesDay.com

    kiirummei{2iJonesDay.com

    JefTrev

    A .

    LeVee

    (State Bar No.125863)

    JONES DAY

    555

    South

    Flower

    Street.

    Fi(tie(h Floor

    LosAngeles.CA 90071

    Telephone: (213)489-3939

    Facsimile:

    (213)

    243-2539

    Email: 1 eveefa)J on es Day.c om

    Attomevs

    forPetitioner

    CAt - i r O R N I A

    HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION

    3 :;

    - 4 - t -

    1

    6

    I

    17 I

    18

    "1

    20 1

    21 i

    I

    3

    i'

    25

    I

    6 I

    27

    28

    I

    SUPERIOR C O U RT O F T H E S T AT E O F C A LIFO RN IA

    COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

    CALIFORNIA HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION.

    Petitioner.

    V .

    SEIU, UNITED HEALTHCARE WORKERS

    - WEST,

    Respondent.

    Case No.

    34 2016 00189567

    tPffnpmynj

    O R D E R

    S H O R T E N I N G

    T I M E

    O N

    P E T I T I O N S

    T O

    C O N F I R M

    A N D

    V A C A T E

    A R B I T R A T I O N

    A W A R D

    Date:

    Time:

    Dept.:

    Judge:

    June 15. 2016

    9:00 a.m.

    53

    Hon. David L. Brown

    Petition Filed:

    January

    26, 2016

    IPROPOSEDI ORDER SHORTENING

    TIME;

    CaseNo.34-2016-00189567

  • 7/26/2019 California Hospital Association's Petition to Confirm Arbitration Award vs. SEIU-UHW 06-16-2016

    8/8

    i

    I

    7 ^

    8 i

    9 I

    0 \

    tl

    I

    12 I

    I

    13 I

    I

    16 I

    17 j

    18 [

    19 I

    r-

    20 I

    21 I

    22 j

    23 \

    I

    24 I

    This mailer

    came

    before

    ihc Cmiri on

    Petiiioner

    California Hospital

    Association

    s

    r

    C l

    f.A'")

    .v

    Parle

    Applicafion l or An

    Order Shortening

    Time

    On

    Petitions

    To Conllrm And

    Vacate

    .Arbitration Award. Goodcauseappearing,theCourt

    hereby

    GRANTS CHA s Fix

    Parte

    Application and ORDERSas fbllows:

    1. CH Ashall file itsPetition to Co.nfirm and SEIU, United HealthcareWorkers -

    West. 'UHW")shall fileitsPetition to

    Vacate

    onJune16. 2016. Each

    party

    shall

    serve

    a

    cs.py

    of

    its Peiition oncounsel lor theotherby

    personal

    deliveryorelectronicmail. r'/*^' - '

    2. Each

    party

    shall

    file

    any

    response

    to the

    other's

    petition on orbefore

    June

    2^, 2016 j

    at 9:00 a.m. Each

    party

    shall

    serve

    a

    copy

    of any

    response

    oncounsel for theotherby

    personal

    y to

    Depanment

    S Z J M- I f / H - ^ ' 'elivery or electronic mail, and shall deliver a courtesy copy to Depanm ent 53AJ^j

    3. A hearing on the cro.ss-petitions is set for June 24. 2016a atzn. p m in

    Departme nt 53. \

    4. Counsel tor CHA is Ordered to immediately ser\c a copy ofthis Order by pcrscnal j

    ~d'eliver> oTeleclrofficmail~on counseTTor UHW" \

    IT IS SOORDERED. I

    Dated:

    June

    15. 2016

    Hon. Dav idL . Brown

    Superior

    Court

    Judge

    25

    27 I

    i

    28

    I

    'PROPOSED

    ORDFRSHORTENING

    T I ME ;Case

    No.

    34-2016-O0189567