california state advisory council (sac) on early …2017/04/26 · california state advisory...
TRANSCRIPT
California State Advisory Council (SAC) on Early
Learning and Care Meeting
Quality Rating and Improvement System
Update
April 26, 2017Cecelia Fisher-Dahms, Quality Office Administrator, California Department of
Education (CDE), Early Education and Support Division (EESD)Sarah Neville-Morgan, Deputy Director, First 5 CA Program Management Division
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONTOM TORLAKSON, State Superintendent of Public Instruction
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
2
• Consortia Closeout:• Completed by the end of September 2016
• Grant Closeout:• State contracts: All closed• 2016 Final Performance Report submitted
April 3, 2017
• Legislative Reports• Will prepare a 2016 Final Legislative Report
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
• A Snapshot of Quality ImprovementSurvey– Data Sources:
• Surveys of 306 teachers in 234 classrooms in142 sites
• Teacher reports of QI experiences (2014-15)
– Descriptive Analysis of participation in:• Coaching and mentoring• Workshops or training• Credit-bearing courses• Peer support activities 3
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
4
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction • Coaching dosage:
– 2.2 hours/month– 1.8 sessions/month– 22.2 hours over 10-month period– 35% had sustained coaching (7-10 months)
• Coaching: Often focused on teacher-childinteractions
• Teachers reported: Coaching is the most
helpful strategy for their professional
development5
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction • Relationship Between Participation
in Coaching and Child Outcomes– Data Sources:
• Direct child assessments in fall & spring2014-15
– Preliteracy (Woodcock-Johnson)– Mathematics (Woodcock-Johnson)– Executive function (Peg Tapping task)
• 108 lead teachers in 87 centers• 1,064 3-5 year-olds in classrooms
6
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction • Associations Between Coaching
and Child Outcomes:– Teachers appreciate coaching & find
it most helpful– More hours of coaching is related to
classroom quality– Coaching is related to children’s
preliteracy skills– More hours of coaching is related to
math and executive functioning 7
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
8
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
9
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction • Data by Tiers: 2014 vs 2016
10
No Rating
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4 Tier 5
2014(1,210)
246 141 193 255 332 43
2016(2,975)
166 50 454 611 1,210 484
11Information on this slide is also available on a table, located at http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/cd/ce/qrissites2014vs16.asp.
12Information on this slide is also available on a table, located at http://www.cde.ca.gov/sp/cd/ce/qrissites2014vs16.asp.
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
13
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
14
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction • Data by Centers: 2014 vs 2016
15
NoRating
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
Tier 5
2014(940)
196 65 86 239 320 34
2016(2,175)
84 17 165 412 1037 460
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
16
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
17
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction • Data by FCCHs: 2014 vs 2016
18
NoRating
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
Tier 5
2014(270)
50 76 107 16 12 9
2016(800)
82 33 289 199 173 24
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
19
Sites in RTT-ELC* Counties
Initial Target
Initial Actual
Percent Change
Final Target
Final Actual
Percent Change
Percent of Total
23,731 629 498 79% 3,150 4,575 145% 19.3%Children in RTT-
ELC Counties
Initial Target
Initial Actual
Percent Change
Final Target
Final Actual
Percent Change
Percent of Total
628,821 22,697 22,697 0 104,357 160,947 154% 25.6%
Top Tiers Target Actual Percent Change
Tier 3 940 767 81.6%Tier 4 828 1467 177.2%Tier 5 282 306 108.5%
*Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge (RTT-ELC)
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
California Quality Rating and Improvement System (QRIS) Consortium
.
20
CA-QRIS Consortium
State-level System Work
• One data source for CA-QRIS: the CA-QRIS Common
Data File
• CDE CA-QRIS Certification Grants: $2 M in support forcertification on QRIS tools and resources, rolled out viathe CA-QRIS Regional Hubs
• Shared governance across all QRIS: Shared resourcesand collaboration using technology (Google Suite,Smartsheet, Collaboration in Common)
• Shared Annual Performance Report
• Improved coordination of assessments 21
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
California Quality Rating and Improvement System (CA–QRIS):
Raising the Quality Of Early Learning and Care For All Children!
Continuous Quality Improvement Pathways
Rating Matrix and Implementation Guide
CA–QRIS Quality Continuum Framework
Membership Membership
Regional Hubs
Provide coordination of T&TA to local/regional QRIS Consortia
10 Regions Statewide
3 Representatives perRegion vote on changes tothe CA-QRIS Framework
Workgroups
Provide input and recommendations on changes to the Framework.
Rating Matrix
Continuous QualityImprovement Pathways
Evaluation
Communications
Planning Committee
Provide input on Consortium Meeting agendas.
Hub Regional Reps
Representatives oforganizations that are requiredlocal QRIS consortia members
State Support Team
Governance
CA-QRIS State Support Team
Leadership & Support
CA Department of Education
First 5 California
CA–QRIS Consortium(Operating a local or regional QRIS through 48 Consortia, which includes all 58 counties)
First 5 IMPACT Funding QRIS Block GrantsFunding
Regional Plan for CLASS Resources
$2.9M
Early Learning Needs Assessment
Tool (ELNAT) $128K
Data Systems$4M
Hub Allocation 10 Lead Agencies
$18M
Local Match Funds
Incentive Layer Funds
$11.6M
Consortia Allocation48 Lead Agencies
$110.4MStatewide Training & Coaching
$12M
Assessor Management
$TBD
Adult-Child Interactions & Coaching
$519K
CA-QRIS Implementation
Support $10.7M
Workforce Development
$1M
First 5 IMPACT$190 Million + Agency In-Kind(FY 2015–2020)
First 5 IMPACT funding is allocated to support a network of local quality improvement systems (Consortia) to better
coordinate, assess, and improve the quality of early learning
settings across California
Local Consortia $122 Million
Regional Hubs $25 Million
Evaluation$16 Million
Statewide T&TA* $27 Million
CA-QRIS Implementation
Oversight $TBD
CA-QRIS System Outcomes Evaluation
$13M
Workforce Registry$TBD
23*Training and Technical Assitance (T&TA)
California Department of Education
36 Consortia Lead Agencies
Allocated for consortia to provide T&TA, and
resources to help infant and toddler child care
providers meet a higher tier of quality as
determined by their local QRIS Rating
Matrix
37 Consortia Lead Agencies
Allocated to CA State Preschool
Program (CSPP) Sites for activities that
support and improve quality, and
assess quality and access.
10 Hub Regional Lead Agencies
Provide an opportunity for regions across the state to build capacity
for certified professional
development trainers, observers, assessors
and coaches
• PITC
• CPIN
• Early Childhood Mentor Program
• PAS & BAS
• CA CSEFEL
• DRDP
• ASQ & ASQ-SE
• Foundations and Frameworks*abbreviations provided below
CSPP QRISBlock Grant$50 Million
Annually
Infant/Toddler QRIS Block
Grant(FY 2015-17)
$24.2 Million
QRIS Certification
Grant(FY 2016-17)
$2 Million
CCDF Quality Projects
(FY 2016-18)
$78 Million
24*Program for Infant/Toddler Care (PITC), California Preschool Instructional Network (CPIN), PAS, BAS, Center on the Social and Emotional Foundations for Early Learning (CSEFEL), Desired Results Developmental Profiles (DRDP), Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) - Socio-Emotional(SE)
25
CA-QRIS Consortium
Local System Work
Move to one Quality Improvment System (QIS) by focusing on local system development:• Shared governance
• Continuous Quality Improvement umbrella
• Seamless system for providers
CA-QRIS ConsortiumLocal System Work
26
10
17
35
27
31
9
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40 No QRIS Block Grants
Same Lead Agency
Same consortium for all fundingstreams (joint meetings, decision-making, etc.)
Seamless system of supports fromprovider perspective (coaching,incentives, etc.)
Shared Local/Regional SystemAdministration
Still working on/having challenges withalignment
Alignment and Coordination Between IMPACT* and QRIS Block Grants
*Improve and Maximize Programs so All Children Thrive (IMPACT)
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
27
CA-QRIS Participation
CA-QRIS Reporting for FY 2015-16
Participating QRIS Sites:• Total Center-based Sites participating in QRIS: 2,554• Total Family Child Care Homes participating in QRIS: 1,082• Total Sites participating in QRIS: 3,674
Children Participating in QRIS:• Preschool Age: 117,098• Toddlers: 11,272• Infants: 4,462• Total: 132,832Totals include sites funded with RTT-ELC, First 5 IMPACT,
and CSPP/IT* Block Grants*California State Preschool Program (CSPP), Infant/Toddler (IT)
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
28
CA-QRIS Participation
Center-Based Sites, 2,554
Family Child Care Sites,
1,082
FY 2016/17PARTICIPATING CA-QRIS SITES BY
FACILITY TYPETotal = 3,674
29
CA-QRIS Participation
117,098
11,272
4,462
- 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000
Preschool Age
Toddlers
Infants
FY 2016/17 CHILDREN SERVED IN PARTICIPATING CA-QRIS
SITES BY AGE GROUPTotal = 132,832
30
CA-QRIS Participation
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
California StatePreschool Program
General Child Care Head Start Early Head Start Migrant Head Start CDE Subsidy Vouchers
FY 2016/17PERCENT OF CA-QRIS SITES BY SPECIFIC
FUNDING SOURCESTotal = 3,674
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
31
First 5 IMPACT FY 2015-16 APR
Consortia are seeking guidance in the following quality improvement strategies:
• Support around the use of Teachstone materials and training
• ASQ/ASQ-SE training
• Coaching on teacher/child interactions
• Career advising/coaching on educational attainment and professionaldevelopment
• Use of the Strengthening Families framework in coaching andtraining.
32
First 5 IMPACT FY 2015-16 Annual Performance Report
In FY 2015-16, Consortia contributed $31,798,933 in match and leveraged funding amounts to support their local QRIS models.
Funding amounts include:
• Cash Match – a contribution by the Lead Agency towardeligible costs of their local QRIS efforts in the form of cash, in-kind, or donated materials.
• Leveraged Funds – financial commitments toward the cost ofprojects/services related to their local QRIS from a sourceother than the Lead Agency.
of Public Instruction
33
First 5 IMPACT FY 2015-16 APR
Consortia leveraged the following funding sources to support local QRIS:
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
34
First 5 IMPACT Partner Survey 2016
• Purpose: To understand the experience ofcollaborating agencies in their county and region during implementation of a local Quality Improvement System (QIS) or Quality Rating Improvement System (QRIS)
• The survey included nearly 400 partneringagencies participating in a local QRIS
• Results included successes and challenges aroundlocal implementation
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
35
First 5 IMPACT Partner Survey 2016 - Key Findings
Extent to which their consortium uses data for accountability and improvement:• Most agree (92%) they operate in a culture and expectation that
data will be regularly reviewed and used to guide continuousimprovement
• Most have agreed-upon processes for sharing data that supportsongoing coordination across sectors
• Most agree they collect credible and sufficient data to solveproblems and support decision making
• Most understand how data collected by their agency can be usedto improve quality early learning across their county
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
First 5 IMPACT Partner Survey 2016 - Key Findings
36
Challenges with decision-making, collaboration, or implementation:• Access to sufficient data to drive improvement
• Availability of resources and or staff toimplement the local QRIS
• Impact of local/state/federal policies andregulations
Statewide Training and Technical Assistance (T&TA)Infrastructure Development for the CA-QRIS
37
Support Implementation of the CA-QRIS Strengthen
Partnerships for
Efficiency
38
Statewide Training and Technical Assistance (T&TA)Infrastructure Development for the CA-QRIS
Promote evidence-based, culturally and linguistically responsive practices
Support local and state implementation of Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) efforts
Support rating and monitoring activities as a part of CA-QRIS
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
39
Statewide Training and Technical Assistance (T&TA)Infrastructure Development for the CA-QRIS
Support for Coaches and Other Leaders
• University of FloridaLastinger Center
• University ofWashington
• WestEd• ZERO TO THREE• i3 Institute
Family Engagement Training and
Resources for Early Childhood
Educators• Brazelton
TouchpointsCenter
Statewide Training and
Trainer Approval Process Linked to
the Registry • WestEd
CA-QRIS Implementation
Supports and Higher Education Modules
• Sacramento CountyOffice of Education
• University ofWashington
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
40
Statewide Training and Technical Assistance (T&TA)Infrastructure Development for the CA-QRIS
• University of Florida Lastinger Center• University of Washington• WestEd
Coaching Communities of Practice Leadership
• University of Florida LastingerCenter
• WestEd• Zero to Three• I3 Institute
Statewide Training and Technical Assistance (T&TA)Infrastructure Development for the CA-QRIS
• Existing CDE trainer/trainingBuild on Existing certification process
Processes • High – Quality local training• Workforce registry
Engage F5CA, CDE, CA-QRIS Consortium, CTC, Stakeholders Higher Education Faculty, WRAB
Professional High Quality trainers/training linked to the
Development CA-QRIS Continuous Quality Improvement Pathways
41
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
2
Statewide Training and Technical Assistance (T&TA)Infrastructure Development for the CA-QRIS
Local FlexibilityStatewide
ConsistencyNational Frameworks
Evidence or Research Based Relationship – Based Early Childhood Family 4
Engagement
Statewide Training and Technical Assistance (T&TA)Infrastructure Development for the CA-QRIS
CA- QRIS Supports for Quality Rating and Implementation
• Assessor ManagementCapacity
• Shared Understanding• Mobile Access to CA-QRIS
Implementation Guidecontent
• CA-QRIS modules forhigher education
43
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
Infant/Toddler QRIS Block Grant
– Awards posted athttp://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/fo/r2/itqrisbg15 result.asp
– $24.165 M in one-time stateGeneral Funds for 2015-16 and2016-17
– Awards extended to 9/30/17– Draft Quality Improvement Budget
for 2017-18 proposes $5.1 M44
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
State Preschool (CSPP) QRIS Block Grant
• 49 counties
• 744 CSPPs providers participatingin the CSPP QRIS Block Grants
• $50 M in Prop 98 funding annually
45
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
2014-15 CSPP QRIS Block Grant Expenditures
46
33%
46%
12%
2%6%
Spending by Category: Percentage
Local QRIS Block Grants Quality Improvement Activities
Assessment and Access Projects Indirect
Unspent Funds
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
2015-16 CSPP QRIS Block Grant Mid-year
47
42%
40%
13%
4%
Percentage of Mid-year Expenditures by Category
Local QRIS Block Grants Quality Improvement Activities
Assessment and Access Projects Indirect
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
CMIG QRIS Block Grants• Amended CSPP QRIS BG for
QRIS counties with CMIG sites– 20 consortia in 21 counties– San Diego CMIG sites declined to participate
• Amount: $800,000• Same parameters as the CSPP
QRIS BG:– Local QRIS BGs to those rated 4 & 5– Quality Improvement to get to tier 4– Assess CMIG sites 48
TOM TORLAKSONState Superintendent of Public Instruction
49