campbell-bozorgnia two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in...

23
Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes Magnitude-scaling model Assumes Mw alone can explain large-magnitude scaling of ground motion Aspect ratio-scaling model: Assumes Mw and aspect ratio (AR) are needed to explain large-magnitude scaling of ground motion

Post on 20-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

Campbell-Bozorgnia

• Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

• Magnitude-scaling model– Assumes Mw alone can explain large-magnitude

scaling of ground motion

• Aspect ratio-scaling model:– Assumes Mw and aspect ratio (AR) are needed to

explain large-magnitude scaling of ground motion

Page 2: Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0Moment Magnitude

10-1

100

101

102

Asp

ect

Rat

io (

L/W

)STRIKE SLIP

N. Cal. - Type ASo. Cal. - Type ANGAWC94 (W = 10)HB02 (W = 10)EL02 (W = 10)

Page 3: Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0Moment Magnitude

10-1

100

101

102

Asp

ect

Rat

io (

L/W

)STRIKE SLIP

N. Cal. - Type ASo. Cal. - Type ANGAWC94 (W = 15)HB02 (W = 15)EL02 (W = 15)

Page 4: Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0Moment Magnitude

10-1

100

101

102

Asp

ect

Rat

io (

L/W

)STRIKE SLIP

N. Cal. - Type ASo. Cal. - Type ANGAWC94 (W = 20)HB02 (W = 20)EL02 (W = 20)

Page 5: Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

Magnitude-Scaling Model

Page 6: Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

PGA, All Faults

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0M

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3R

ES

IDU

AL

Page 7: Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

PGA, All Faults

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14LW

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3R

ES

IDU

AL

Page 8: Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

With Surface Slip, Strike-Slip Faults

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0M

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3R

ES

IDU

AL

Page 9: Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

PGA, W/O Surface Slip, Strike-Slip Faults

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0M

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3R

ES

IDU

AL

Page 10: Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

Atten373 (Model 1), Resid stages 1 & 2 (combined), PGA

0 10 20 30 40 50 60RRUP

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

RE

S1_

2_P

GA

Page 11: Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

Atten373 (Model 1), Resid stages 1 & 2 (combined), PGA

4 5 6 7 8M

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

RE

S1_

2_P

GA

Page 12: Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

1 10 100Horizontal Distance to Fault (km)

10-2

10-1

100A

ccel

erat

ion

(g

)PGA

Campbell & Bozorgnia (2003)Campbell & Bozorgnia (Prelim NGA)

PARAMETERS:

M = 6.5, 7.0, 7.5, 8.0

Fault = Strike Slip

Dip = 90

Vs30 = 600 (C)

Page 13: Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0

Moment Magnitude

10-2

10-1

100A

ccel

erat

ion

(g

)PGA

Campbell & Bozorgnia (2003)Campbell & Bozorgnia (Prelim NGA)

PARAMETERS:

Rjb = 0, 5, 10, 25

Fault = Strike Slip

Dip = 90

Vs30 = 270 (D)

Page 14: Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

Dip (degrees)

0.0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

2.0

Fau

ltin

g F

acto

rSTYLE OF FAULTING

PGA - ReversePSA (1s) - ReversePGA - NormalPSA (1s) - Normal

Page 15: Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

Aspect Ratio-Scaling Model

Page 16: Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

PGA, All Faults

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0M

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

RE

SID

UA

L

Page 17: Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

PGA, All Faults

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14LW

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3R

ES

IDU

AL

Page 18: Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

PGA, With Surface Slip, Strike-Slip Faults

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0M

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

RE

SID

UA

L

Page 19: Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

PGA, W/O Surface Slip, Strike-Slip Faults

4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0M

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2

3

RE

SID

UA

L

Page 20: Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0

Moment Magnitude

10-2

10-1

100

Acc

eler

atio

n (

g)

PGA

Campbell & Bozorgnia (NGA AR-Scaling)Campbell & Bozorgnia (NGA M-Scaling)

PARAMETERS:

Rjb = 0, 5, 10, 25

Fault = Strike Slip

Dip = 90

Vs30 = 600 (C)

Page 21: Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0

Moment Magnitude

10-2

10-1

100

Ac

ce

lera

tio

n (

g)

PGA

Campbell & Bozorgnia (NGA AR-Scaling)Campbell & Bozorgnia (NGA M-Scaling)

PARAMETERS:

Rjb = 0, 5, 10, 25

Fault = Strike Slip

Dip = 90, W = 20

Vs30 = 600 (C)

Page 22: Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

Basin Effects: Influence of Depth to

Vs = 1.5 km/sec

Page 23: Campbell-Bozorgnia Two candidate models are currently being considered to capture the change in magnitude scaling of ground motion at large magnitudes

0 1000 2000 3000 4000Z1_5

-3

-2

-1

0

1

2R

ES

1_2 _

T1