campuslocationsmap - conroe isdconroeisd.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/budget-book-pdf...glvwulfw v...
TRANSCRIPT
Effective
September 1, 2016 - August 31, 2017
Conroe Independent School District
Official Budget
2016-2017
3205 West Davis Conroe, Texas 77304-2098
www.conroeisd.net
Effective
September 1, 2016 - August 31, 2017
Conroe Independent School District
Official Budget
3205 West Davis Conroe, Texas 77304-2098
I s s u e d b y F i n a n c e O f f i c e
D a r r i n R i c e
C h i e f F i n a n c i a l O f f i c e r
J a n i t h S t o w e r s
B u s i n e s s & A c c o u n t i n g M a n a g e r
K a r e n G a r z a
B u s i n e s s & A c c o u n t i n g M a n a g e r
C y n d i W e s t r u p
S e n i o r A c c o u n t a n t
R a c h a e l B a t a l l a
S t a f f A c c o u n t a n t
www.conroeisd.net
Conroe Independent School District
Table of Contents
2016-17 Budget Introductory Section Principal Officials ............................................................................................................................ 1 Executive Summary .................................................................................................. 3 Certificate for Meritorious Budget Award ...................................................................................... 18 Certificate for Distinguished Budget Presentation Award............................................................. 19 Organizational Section Organizational Chart ..................................................................................................................... 21 Vision Statement and Strategic Goals .......................................................................................... 22 2016-2017 Strategic Plan ............................................................................................................. 23 Financial Structure and Basis of Accounting ................................................................................ 49 Classification of Revenues and Expenditures .............................................................................. 50 Significant Financial Policies and Procedures .............................................................................. 54 Budget Policies and Development Procedures ............................................................................ 57 Budget Calendar ........................................................................................................................... 59 Budget Administration and Management Process ....................................................................... 62 Financial Section Financial Overview ....................................................................................................................... 65 Combined Budget Summary ........................................................................................................ 66 Combined Property Tax Rate Calculation Worksheet .................................................................. 68 Impact of Budget on Taxpayers .................................................................................................... 69 Tax Rate Comparisons ................................................................................................................. 70 General Fund General Fund Overview ................................................................................................................ 73 Budget Summary: 2016-2017 Summary by Major Object and Function ...................................... 78 Expenditure Summary by Major Object ........................................................................................ 79 Expenditure Summary by Major Object Within Function .............................................................. 80 Major Object Summary by Campus .............................................................................................. 84 Five Year Summary of Revenues and Expenditures ................................................................... 86 General Fund Organization Summaries Organizational Summaries ........................................................................................................... 87 Organizational Overview .............................................................................................................. 88 Superintendent Goals & Objectives.............................................................................................. 92 Deputy Superintendent of Operations Goals & Objectives .......................................................... 94 Deputy Superintendent of Schools Goals & Objectives ............................................................... 96 Financial Services Goals & Objectives ......................................................................................... 98 Legal Services Goals & Objectives ............................................................................................ 100 Security Goals & Objectives ....................................................................................................... 102 Campus Budget Summary ......................................................................................................... 104 Elementary / Intermediate Schools Budget Summary ................................................................ 105 Individual Elementary / Intermediate Schools Goals & Budgets ................................................ 106 Secondary Schools Budget Summary ........................................................................................ 189 Individual Secondary Schools Goals & Budgets ........................................................................ 190 Summer School Budget Summary ............................................................................................. 224
Table of Contents (continued) Debt Service Fund Debt Service Fund Overview ...................................................................................................... 225 Five Year Summary of Revenues and Expenditures ................................................................. 227 Revenue and Expenditure Summary by Major Object ............................................................... 228 Debt Retirement Summary ......................................................................................................... 229 Bond Schedule ........................................................................................................................... 230 Debt Service Requirements Until Maturity ................................................................................. 232 Debt Service Requirements to Maturity by Issue Date............................................................... 233 Capital Projects Fund Capital Projects Fund Overview ................................................................................................. 237 Five Year Summary of Revenues and Expenditures ................................................................. 241 Revenue and Expenditure Summary by Major Object ............................................................... 242 Capital Projects Summary .......................................................................................................... 243 Capacity, Enrollment and Age by Schools ................................................................................. 246 Food Service Fund Food Service Special Revenue Fund Overview ......................................................................... 249 Goals & Objectives .................................................................................................................... 250 Five Year Summary of Revenues and Expenditures ................................................................. 251 Revenue and Expenditure Summary by Major Object ............................................................... 252 Informational Section Long-Range Financial Forecasts................................................................................................ 253 Financial Projections and Forecasts........................................................................................... 258 Impact of Budget on Taxpayers .................................................................................................. 266 Assessed and Estimated Value of Taxable Properties – Ten Year Summary ........................... 267 Property Tax Rates, Levies, and Collections – Ten Year Summary .......................................... 268 Financial Projections & Forecasts .............................................................................................. 269 Personnel Salary Proposals......................................................................................................................... 273 General Fund Schedule of Payroll Expenditures by Function .................................................... 274 Position Counts by Year ............................................................................................................. 275 Budgeted Position Counts by Division and in Total.................................................................... 276 2016-17 Hiring Schedule ............................................................................................................ 277 Staffing Formulas........................................................................................................................ 278 Performance Measures Annual Accountability Summary ................................................................................................. 283 District Accountability Summary ................................................................................................. 284 Campus Accountability Summaries ............................................................................................ 285 Department Performance ........................................................................................................... 342 SAT / ACT Results..................................................................................................................... .344 Senior Exit Survey ...................................................................................................................... 345 Additional Information Location of Campuses ................................................................................................................ 349 2016-2017 Test Dates ................................................................................................................ 350 2016-2017 School Calendar ....................................................................................................... 352 Glossary of Terms .................................................................................................................... 353
Introductory Section
Conroe Independent School District
Principal Officials
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Length of TermBoard of Trustees Service Expires Occupation
Mr. John Husbands 13 Years 2016 Insurance AgentPresident
Mr. Scott Kid 4 Years 2016 Attorney1st Vice President
Mr. Datren Williams 4 Years 2016 Financial Analyst2nd Vice President
Mrs. Melanie Bush 2 Years 2018 Business OwnerSecretary
Mr. Ray Sanders 6 Years 2018 Finance CounselorImmediate Past President
Ms. Jessica Powell 4 Years 2016 Instructional TechnologyTrustee
Mr. Skeeter Hubert 2 Years 2018 Financial ServicesTrustee
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICIALS
LengthOfficial Position of Service
Dr. Don Stockton Superintendent of Schools 30 Years
Dr. Chris Hines Deputy Superintendent of Operations 15 Years
Dr. Curtis Null Deputy Superintendent of Schools 14 Years
Mr. Darrin Rice Chief Financial Officer 27 Years
Dr. Debbie Phillips Assistant Superintendent for Elementary Education 1 Year
Mr. James Kacur Assistant Superintendent for Secondary Education 2 Years
Mrs. Carrie Galatas General Counsel 19 Years
1
Conroe Independent School District
2
Executive Summary Conroe Independent School District
Fiscal Year 2016-2017
Budget Information
The following document represents the financial plan for the Conroe Independent School District for the 2016-17 fiscal year. This document culminates an intensive process involving input from parents, citizens, campus and administrative staff, the Superintendent and the Board of Trustees. This budget provides the financial resources necessary to maintain our existing facilities, and provide the necessary funds to operate our fifty-five existing campuses. This budget document and the year-end Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) are the primary vehicles used to present the financial plan and the results of operations of the District. This document was prepared in the format necessary to meet the requirements of the Association of School Business Officials International (ASBO) Meritorious Budget Award Program and the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Distinguished Budget Presentation Award Program. ASBO and GFOA presented their Budget Presentation Awards to the Conroe Independent School District for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning September 1, 2015. In order to receive these awards, a governmental unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, as an operations guide, as a financial plan, and as a communication device. These awards are valid for a period of one year only. We believe our current budget continues to conform to program requirements, and we are submitting it to ASBO and GFOA to determine its eligibility for another award. However, the primary purpose of this document is to provide timely and useful information concerning the past, current, and projected financial status of the District in order to facilitate financial decisions that support the educational goals of the District.
Budget Overview & Highlights Federal, state and local guidelines guide the budget development process. The annually adopted budget includes the General, Debt Service, Capital Projects and Food Service. Total expenditures for all funds are 746,317,966. This plan provides the resources necessary for reaching the goals established in the District’s improvement plan.
Projected Budget Percent
2015-16 2016-17 Change
General Fund 426,229,201$ 447,580,555$ 5.01%
Debt Service Fund 84,233,299 88,077,713 4.56%
Capital Projects Fund 88,672,280 192,659,698 117.27%
Food Service Fund 19,287,501 18,000,000 -6.68%
Total 618,422,281$ 746,317,966$ 20.68%
Total Expenditures by Fund Comparison
3
Executive Summary (continued) As one of the largest employers in Houston’s northern suburbs, Conroe Independent School District has approximately 6,083 full time employees. The chart below will illustrate the changes in staffing levels proposed for 2016-17. In the past 5 years the district has added an additional 685 employees to meet student needs, maintain state and local class sizes, and provide a level of support for the various departments. The majority of the 685 added FTE’s occurred in the teacher category as a result of student growth.
Actual Actual Actual Projected Budgeted
Position 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17
Administrators 174.0 179.0 185.0 186.0 190.0
Counselors 147.1 149.6 161.6 161.6 164.6
Librarians 57.0 59.0 61.0 61.0 62.0
Manual Trades 858.0 891.0 910.5 925.5 943.5
Nurses 54.2 56.2 59.2 60.2 61.2
Paraprofessionals/Aides 823.5 863.5 886.0 896.5 916.5
Professionals 76.0 86.9 99.9 107.4 111.4
Psych/OTPT Services - Paraprofessional 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Psych/OTPT Services - Professionals 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0
Special Ed - Paraprofessional 20.0 21.0 21.0 29.0 39.0
Special Ed - Professionals 21.8 22.8 22.8 22.8 24.8
Support Personnel 87.0 94.0 95.0 98.0 100.0
Teachers 3,057.1 3,157.6 3,264.1 3,358.6 3,447.6
Totals 5,397.7 5,602.6 5,788.1 5,928.6 6,082.6
Percentage Change 2.05% 3.80% 3.31% 2.43% 2.60%
Conroe Independent School District
Position Counts by Year
(General Fund only)
The District has experienced significant increases in enrollment over the last ten years of 1200-1600 students per year. This trend is expected to continue into the foreseeable future.
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
55,000
60,000
65,000
07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17
Enrollment Trend
A brief summary of each fund follows. Additional detailed information is included in the remainder of this document.
4
Executive Summary (continued)
General Fund
Revenues General Fund revenues are budgeted to decrease $21,269,667, or 4.5% under 2015-16 projected revenue. The following table provides a comparison of revenues by source for the current year (projected) and the 2016-17-budget year.
Projected Budget Percent
2015-16 2016-17 Change
Local Sources 314,016,139$ 325,498,681$ 3.66%
State sources 156,422,214 127,846,130 -18.27%
Federal sources 4,176,125 - -100.00%
Total 474,614,478$ 453,344,811$ -4.48%
General Fund Revenue Sources Comparison
The decrease in State revenue is due primarily to the Robin Hood effect in the funding formulas. As the district’s property values increase, the state recaptures that increase in value by decreasing funding proportionately in the following fiscal year. A portion of the recapture was offset by student enrollment growth. The federal revenue that the District receives is based on Medicaid reimbursement application and is subject to federal regulations, therefore the District does not include this as budgeted revenue. The District will continue to apply for this funding. For the 2016-76 fiscal year, approximately 28% of the General Fund expenditures will be funded through state contributions. The remaining 72% will be funded locally.
28%
72%
General Fund2016-17 Revenue Budget
State Revenue
Local Revenue
5
Executive Summary (continued)
The Texas Legislature meets biennially unless the Governor requests a special session. Senate
Bill 1 (S.B.1) was passed by the 84th Regular Session of the Texas Legislature. S.B. 1 authorized
an increase of $1.5 billion in funding for enrollment growth over the biennium, to the formulas
used to calculate Foundation School Program funding for Texas school districts. For additional
information on the State of Texas budget visit this website. http://www.lbb.state.tx.us/. Although
the actual calculations for state funding are rather complicated, the basic calculations are as
follows:
The Tier I component of school funding represents the cost of providing basic educational services for students in the district. A school district’s entitlement in Tier 1 is determined by the various types of students that attend school in the district and the size of the district. Districts are entitled to a certain amount of revenue for each student, with those that are more expensive to educate generating more money through a series of “weights.” The total cost is divided between the state and the school district, with the district’s share determined by applying the district’s compressed maintenance and operations (M&O) tax rate (2005 adopted maintenance and operations [M&O] rate multiplied by 0.6667) to its taxable value, and the state paying the remaining portion. The district’s share remains the same regardless of how many additional students there are or what the total cost is, and property wealthy districts pay a larger percentage of their total entitlement than less wealthy districts. S.B. 1 increased the basic allotment to $5,140.
In Tier II, the state will subsidize tax receipts as needed to produce a guaranteed level of revenue per student per penny of property tax levy. The guaranteed yield program provides funds for educational services beyond the basic programs financed through Tier I. The first level of Tier II was collapsed into the basic allotment so that the guaranteed yield for enrichment is paid on the tax effort that exceeds the compressed rate. The Tier II, Level II yield per student in weighted average daily attendance (WADA) was increased to $77.53 for 2016-2017.
In addition to the funds received under Tier I and II, the District recognizes as revenue the amounts contributed by the State of Texas to the Teacher Retirement System (TRS) on behalf of the District’s employees. This amount is also recognized as an expenditure. The State contributed 6.8 of all employees’ eligible gross earnings except for those District employees subject to statutory minimum requirements and those employees being paid from and participating in federally funded programs. The statutory minimum requirements (locally funded portion) are based on the State teacher schedule and then adjusted based on local tax rates. After determining the necessary level of expenditures to meet District educational goals and facility requirements and estimating State aid utilizing the above funding formula, the tax rate necessary to fund remaining expenditures is calculated. This calculation is based on estimated property values, after giving consideration to exemptions, including the homestead exemption.
$- $5,000,000,000
$10,000,000,000 $15,000,000,000 $20,000,000,000 $25,000,000,000 $30,000,000,000 $35,000,000,000
2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17
Tax Base Trend
`
6
Executive Summary (continued) Expenditures
General Fund expenditures are budgeted to increase $21,351,354 or 5.0% over 2015-16 projected expenditures. The following table provides a comparison of expenditures by object for the current year (projected) and the 2016-17 budget year:
Projected Budget Percent
2015-16 2016-17 Change
Payroll cost 379,612,244$ 398,566,754$ 4.99%
Purchased services 23,555,684 23,543,236 -0.05%
Supplies 16,564,733 19,056,675 15.04%
Other operating 4,517,653 5,890,890 30.40%
Capital outlay 1,978,887 523,000 -73.57%
Total 426,229,201$ 447,580,555$ 5.01%
General Fund Expenditures by Object Comparison
Since the education of students is a labor-intensive process, payroll expenditures, including benefits comprise approximately 89.06% of the General Fund expenditures. Budgeted expenditures for salaries are determined in accordance with established staffing guidelines that are based on projected student enrollment at each individual campus.
89.06%
5.26%4.26%
1.32%
0.12%
General Fund Expenditures by Major Object
Payroll Cost
Purchase & cont. serv.
Supplies and materials
Other operating expend
Capital outlay
7
Executive Summary (continued) The following graph depicts the District’s budget emphasis on curriculum and instruction while continuing to control and monitor administrative expenditures.
84%
1%
2%
13% General Fund Expenditures by Major Function
Instruction
Instructional administration
General administration
Plant maintenance &operations
Debt Service Fund Debt Service fund revenue is budgeted to increase $6,461,204 or 8.85% over 2015-2016 projected revenue. The following table provides a comparison of revenues by source for the current year (projected) and the 2016-2017 budget year:
Projected Budget Percent
2015-16 2016-17 Change
Local Sources $71,447,109 77,915,916$ 9.05%
State Sources 1,555,365 1,547,762 -0.49%
Total 73,002,474$ 79,463,678$ 8.85%
Debt Service Fund Revenue Sources Comparison
Debt Service Fund expenditures are budgeted at $88,077,713, an increase of $3,844,414 or 4.56% over 2015-2016 projected expenditures.
8
Executive Summary (continued)
Capital Projects Fund
The Capital Projects fund accounts, on a project basis, for projects financed by the proceeds from bond issues, or for capital projects otherwise mandated to be accounted for in this fund. The capital projects fund utilizes the modified accrual basis of accounting. Capital Projects fund expenditures are budgeted to increase $103,987,418 or 117% from 2015-2016 projected expenditures. This increase is a result of planned expenditures to continue approved projects from the 2015 bond referendum.
- 25,000,000 50,000,000 75,000,000
100,000,000 125,000,000 150,000,000 175,000,000 200,000,000
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Expenditures
Food Service Fund
Food Service fund revenue is budgeted to decrease $1,090,892 or approximately 5.7% less than the 2015-2016 projected revenue. The following table provides a comparison of revenues by source for the current year projected and the 2016-17 budget year.
Projected Budget Percent
2015-16 2016-17 Change
Local Source 7,287,364$ 7,705,214$ 5.73%
State Source 93,793 - -100.00%
Federal sources 11,709,735 10,294,786 -12.08%
Total 19,090,892$ 18,000,000$ -5.71%
Food Service Fund Revenue Sources Comparison
Federal revenue in the Food Service Fund is received from the U. S. Department of Agriculture under the National School Lunch Program, the School Breakfast Program and the Food Distribution Program. Food Service fund expenditures are budgeted at $18,000,000, a decrease of $1,287,501 or 6.6% less than 2015-2016 projected expenditures. The vast majority of the expenditures in the food service program are for labor and food costs. It is recommended that the fund balance for Food Service not exceed approximately three months of average food service operation expenditures. The current fund balance is projected at $2,431,806 which is within these guidelines. These balances must be used exclusively for allowable child nutrition program purposes.
9
Executive Summary (continued)
Long Range Financial Forecasts
General Fund & Debt Service Fund The general and debt service funds have two primary sources of revenue, tax collections and state funding. Expenditures in the general fund are allocated primarily to personnel while expenditures incurred in the debt service fund are for the payment of bond principal and interest. Many factors are taken into consideration when developing long range forecasts including enrollment projections, taxable value estimates, State aid estimates, legislative changes, and economic conditions that may impact the district.
Budgeted Projected Projected Projected
2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20
Total Revenue 453,344,811$ 459,192,294$ 466,330,063$ 476,506,240
Total Expenditures (447,580,555) (464,720,041) (482,289,630) (500,542,219)
Other Uses - - - -
Change in Fund Balance 5,764,256$ (5,527,747)$ (15,959,568)$ (24,035,979)$
Fund Balance - Beg of Year 126,772,869$ 132,537,125$ 127,009,378$ 111,049,810$
Fund Balance - End of Year 132,537,125$ 127,009,378$ 111,049,810$ 87,013,831$
Budgeted Projected Projected Projected
2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20
Total Revenue 79,463,678$ 83,955,460 88,010,888$ 91,073,920
Total Expenditures (88,077,713) (88,073,213) (88,073,194) (88,079,875)
Other Uses - - - -
Change in Fund Balance (8,614,035)$ (4,117,753)$ (62,306)$ 2,994,045$
Fund Balance - Beg of Year 32,997,945$ 24,383,910$ 20,266,157$ 20,203,851$
Fund Balance - End of Year 24,383,910$ 20,266,157$ 20,203,851$ 23,197,896$
General Fund
Debt Service Fund
10
Executive Summary (continued)
Tax Rate Impact
The District’s tax rate consists of two separate components — maintenance and operations rate (General Fund) and a debt service rate. The overall 2016-17 combined rate will remain at $1.28 due to the factors discussed above. Taxes are calculated by dividing the assessed property value (less the homestead exemption amount, if applicable) by 100 and multiplying by the tax rate. The Montgomery County Appraisal District determines property values.
0.80
1.00
1.20
1.40
1.60
1.80
Co
mb
ine
d T
ax
Ra
te
Fiscal Year
Tax Rate History
Debt Service Maintenance & Operations
Budget Process and Significant Changes The State, the TEA, and the local district formulate legal requirements for school district budgets. These requirements are stipulated in detail within the subsequent sections of this document. The budget process begins in December of each year with the preparation of the budget calendar and enrollment projections. These enrollment forecasts are used extensively during the budget development stage to determine campus allotments and staffing allocations. In order to decentralize the budget process, site-based decision making teams, working under the direction of each campus principal, contribute extensively to campus budget decisions. Each campus receives a basic allotment per student to be used for supplies, materials, equipment, staff development and other appropriate instructional costs. The basic allotment to campuses for the 2016-17 budget year has remained the same as the prior year. The site-based decision making teams make decisions concerning utilization of this allocation. Budgets for non-campus units are developed by department heads and reviewed by the Superintendent and the Chief Financial Officer. Established staffing guidelines are utilized to develop payroll budgets. Personnel units are allocated to each campus based on student enrollment following state mandated ratios as applicable. Non-campus personnel units are evaluated at each departmental budget. Additional personnel units are evaluated each year and after extensive review and analysis, recommendations are presented to the Board of Trustees. Following this development process, consolidated budgetary information is presented to the Board of Trustees in workshops and regular meetings.
11
Executive Summary (continued) This information is summarized in this draft document and line item detail is provided, as requested, through written and oral supporting information.
Encumbrance accounting is utilized in all funds. Encumbrances for goods or purchased services are documented by purchase orders or contracts. Under Texas law, General Fund appropriations lapse each August 31, and encumbrances outstanding at that time are to be either canceled or appropriately provided for in the subsequent year's budget. Significant Changes The budget development process has not significantly changed for the 2016-17 fiscal year. One of the priorities when developing the budget for 2016-17 was managing the increased property tax revenue as a result of continued growth in assessed values. While we will benefit from the tax revenue growth in this year our focus was on planning for future reductions in funding from the state due to the increased property values.
District Profile
Residents of the District elect a seven-member Board of Trustees (the Board), each of whom serves for three years. Monthly meetings of the Board are posted and advertised as prescribed under state laws so that the Board may fulfill its charge to the students, parents, staff, and taxpayers of the District. Special meetings or study sessions are scheduled as needed. The Board has final control over all school matters except as limited by state law. The District’s vision of where it is headed is the culmination of months of study, collective thought, and thoughtful activities by all constituent groups in the District. 2016: A Vision for CISD
CISD is a learning community united in its commitment to ensuring all students graduate with confidence and competence. The schools and communities work together to provide performance
standards which can be applied to the real world. This is achieved through the implementation of quality in instruction, operations, and leadership.
Conroe ISD has developed a District Improvement Plan as well as Campus Improvement Plans based on comprehensive needs assessments. These plans guide the District and Campus Level Planning and Decision Making Committees in determining specific strategies which will strengthen the attainment of the District's vision. District and campus goals include:
Student achievement & post-secondary success;
Fiscal responsibility;
Recruitment, development & retention of staff;
Parents & community;
Safe schools;
Technology;
Communication; The annual budget serves as the foundation for the District’s financial planning and control. The District maintains budgetary controls throughout all of its financial systems. The objective of these controls is to ensure compliance with legal provisions embodied in the annually appropriated budget approved by the Board of Trustees. Activities of the general fund, special revenue funds, debt service fund and capital projects funds are included in the annually appropriated budget. The level of budgetary control (the level at which expenditures cannot legally exceed the appropriated amount) is established by function within each individual fund. The District also maintains an encumbrance accounting system as one technique of
12
Executive Summary (continued) accomplishing budgetary control. Although encumbered amounts lapse at year-end, they are generally re-appropriated as part of the next year's budget through a Board-adopted budget amendment.
Factors Affecting Financial Condition The information presented in the budget is perhaps best understood when it is considered within the broader perspective of the specific environment in which the District operates. Located just north of Houston, Texas in Montgomery County, serving the communities of Conroe, The Woodlands, Oak Ridge North, Shenandoah, and Cut ‘n Shoot, the District’s boundaries encompass approximately 348 square miles in Montgomery County and is a dynamic factor in the quality of life and economic development efforts of the area. Residential properties account for approximately 68.2% of net taxable AV, followed by commercial and industrial properties, which account for nearly 16.8% of net taxable AV. While the oil-and-gas industry and mineral production have a substantial presence in the regional economy, these activities make up a minimal amount of the tax base. Furthermore, the district is bisected by the Houston-Dallas Freeway (Interstate 45), U.S. Highway 75, and state highways 105 and 242. These highways connect residents with employment opportunities in the rapidly expanding Houston MSA, which we consider broad and diverse. Therefore, district population growth remains strong. Likewise, there has been substantial AV growth within the district as market values have continued to increase. The following table provides information on the district’s top ten taxpayers and employers.
Total Assessed Top Ten Employers Employee Count
Anadarko Realty Co 387,528,750$ Conroe Independent School District 7209
Entergy Texas Inc 151,851,510$ Anadarko Petroleum Corporation 3867
McKesson Corporation 114,631,703$ Memorial Hermann The Woodlands Hospital 2001
The Woodlands Mall 110,787,296$ Montgomery County 1998
HL Champion Holding Company LLC 102,285,920$ ExxonMobil 1900
Wal-Mart 101,216,233$ Hewitt Associates 1800
Woodlands Land Dev 101,121,777$ CHI St. Luke's Health The Woodlands 1510
IMI Market Street LLC 89,596,510$ Conroe Regional Medical Center 1300
Ball Metal Container Corp 87,566,965$ CB & I 1008
CLPF Waterway Plaza LLC 77,479,560$ Hunstman Company LLC 894
Top Ten Tax Payers
Conroe Independent School District is the 13th largest district in the State and the 70th largest in the United States, serving over 59,000 students at 60 campuses. The Conroe Independent School District is among the fastest growing school districts in the state with a growth of approximately 1,200-1,600 additional students each year (which represents 2.3 % of the total 59,639 student population), and is projected to surpass an enrollment of 71,000 students by the year 2025. Conroe ISD covers almost one-third of Montgomery County, which is the 7th fastest growing county in the United States according to recent Census Bureau estimates. Employment Trends & Economy Unlike most of the State and nation, unemployment has remained fairly stable or has declined in both Conroe and Montgomery County over the past several years. The predominantly residential district is in one of the fastest-growing counties in the state. The district is experiencing healthy tax base expansion. The district's underlying economy continues to experience significant growth, spurred by new residential and commercial development, particularly along the I-45 corridor. About 5,000 acres of land are in various stages of master planning or construction, which should add thousands of new residences over the next several years and could significantly affect district AV and enrollment. The relocation of several major and large corporate office to The Woodlands and South Montgomery County – Anadarko, McKesson, Hewitt & Associates, Denbury Onshore
13
Executive Summary (continued) LLC, Exxon Mobile etc. has had a positive impact on the tax base, while also bringing an influx of families and potential students to Montgomery Country and the schools of Conroe ISD. The chart below displays comparative employment statistics for the county, state and country.
Montgomery County
Year Personal Per Capita Percent Percent Percent
Ended Civilian Total Incomeª Personalª Unemployed Unemployed Unemployed
August 31 Labor Force Employment (In Thousands) Income County State U.S.
2007 198,773 191,405 17,562,064 42,704 3.7 4.1 4.6
2008 205,721 196,369 19,234,503 46,302 4.5 5.1 6.1
2009 210,934 194,632 20,366,481 45,490 7.7 8.1 9.6
2010 220,539 203,453 20,753,439 45,184 7.7 8.4 9.5
2011 227,955 210,846 22,882,899 48,508 7.5 8.4 9.1
2012 237,435 222,574 24,638,680 50,796 6.3 7.0 8.2
2013 244,071 231,189 26,549,916 53,192 5.3 6.3 7.3
2014 253,103 241,166 29,982,523 55,849 4.7 5.5 6.3
2015 250,993 240,362 29,982,523 55,849 4.2 4.4 5.2
2016 259,617 245,412 29,982,523 55,849 5.5 5.0 5.0
ª Personal & per capita income information is only available through 2014 therefore the same income was used through 2016
Labor Market Statistics
With strong collaborative ties with the chambers of commerce and the business community, with the other local governmental entities in the area and with the Lone Star College System, CISD is making new inroads in building support and targeting resources to achieve the greatest impact for all of our students. The financial, cultural, educational and recreational climate of the area is a testimony to the collective leadership and to the communities’ progressive attitude toward responsible growth and their vision of the future.
Major Indicators In looking at the most common indicators of quality in a school system, the following are examples of what is going on in the District: Test Scores In 2011-12 the TAKS test was replaced by a new standardized test called the State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness (STAAR). The district received a “Met Standard” accountability rating on the 2016 Accountability Summary. The district performed above state standards on all four Performance Indexes which include Student Achievement, Student Progress, Closing Performance Gaps and Postsecondary Readiness. In addition, the district met standard on all required safeguards which include Performance Rates, Participation Rates, Graduation Rates & Federal Limits on Alternative Assessments. Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) scores have also risen over the last several years and are above the national averages even when a higher percentage of District students take the test than their peers across the nation. In 2016 Conroe ISD continues to test a high number of students on the SAT (2,165) and ACT (1,606).
14
Executive Summary (continued) Attendance Rate - Despite the rapid growth in the District and the problems facing families today, the attendance rate (96.3%) in the District remains high. Completion Rate - The District’s completion rate is 99.4% and is well above the State average, meaning more students are finishing high school and are entering college or the work force. Parental/Student Attitude - Eighty-eight percent of parents responding to a survey conducted by an outside polling company said they believe their children are receiving a quality education in the District. In a survey used to audit the District’s curriculum areas, students revealed that they, too, believe they are receiving a quality education.
Public Support - The 2015 Bond Referendum passed with a positive vote in every geographic area of the District. Patrons continue to be extremely supportive of the District’s efforts. The bond referendum includes the construction of new schools and classroom additions to accommodate student growth, improvements to aged buildings to sustain capacity, funding for robotics and Career and Technical Education facilities, and the continuation of safety and security upgrades. Other Information The District received its Financial Integrity Rating System of Texas (FIRST) score from the Texas Education Agency for fiscal year 2014-2015 and the District scored the highest rating attainable - “Superior”. Conroe ISD received the highest recognition for transparency from the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts for seven years in a row. Conroe ISD was selected by the Educational Results Partnership (ERP) and the Institute for Productivity in Education (IPE) as one of nine public school districts in Texas to receive the title of 2015 Honor Roll District.
Conroe ISD has earned a 5‐Star Rating by the 2016 Texas Smart Schools. Conroe ISD is one of
only 3 ISD’s to receive a 5‐Star rating for all six years.
Conroe ISD received a 1.1 rating from the Education Resource Group (ERG) for high academic performance by students and efficiency in spending. The District is 1 of 10 school districts in Texas to receive this top ranking.
Key Factors and Summary Challenges The most significant challenge presented in forming the Conroe ISD budget is the continual increase in student enrollment of 1200-1600 per year. The continued increase of enrollment requires additional financial resources to fund areas such as, campus personnel, support staff, instructional facilities, equipment, and supplies. In addition to the recurring required increases that are necessary in every budget year, the opening of new campuses provides significant challenges. With these new costs the district has increased the 2016-17 General Fund budget by $21,351,354 or 5.0% over the projected expenditures for 2015-16. Payroll costs account for the largest portion of the increase at $18.9 million or 89% of the total budget increase.
15
Executive Summary (continued) The District feels certain that even with these challenges the District will be able to maintain a constant and stable fund balance in the General Fund. Each section of this report will show how the challenges that face the District can be met due to the following factors.
Continued growth of the tax base (averaging 8.2% over past 10 yrs.)
Ability to raise the tax rate if necessary
State Funding being based on student attendance
Voter support for Bond Referendums Funding Sources
The General and Debt Service funds receive funding from two major sources: tax revenues and state funding. The District receives approximately 72% of its revenues from local sources. Although the District’s student population is growing, the District tax base is growing at an even faster rate. With the growth in the District’s tax base, the District is able to provide adequate funding to cover the increased cost due to student growth, and provide resources necessary for reaching the goals established by the District. The Capital Projects Fund receives its funding from the proceeds from the sale of bonds. These bonds are approved through bond referendums that are approved by the voters in Conroe ISD. The last bond referendum was approved in 2015 in the amount of $487,000,000. The Food Service Special Revenue Fund has two major sources of revenue, national school lunch and breakfast program and user fees –i.e. student payments for meals. The national school program accounts for approximately (57%) of the budget and user fees generate (43%). The 2016-17 budget was developed according to goals and directions established by the Board of Trustees and the Superintendent. These goals are evident in all areas of the budget as resources are allocated as necessary to meet the established criteria. Acknowledgments - We would like to express appreciation to the Board of Trustees for concern in providing fiscal accountability to the patrons of our District and for its leadership in the development of one of the best educational operations within the State of Texas. Many hours have been devoted to this District by teachers, principals and administrators, and thanks is extended to the entire Conroe Independent School District Team who have worked so hard to provide a high-quality, cost-efficient education to the students we serve. Additionally, the preparation of this report was accomplished through much time and effort on the part of the District’s Finance Department and special appreciation is expressed to them.
16
Conroe Independent School District
17
This Meritorious Budget Award is presented to
CONROE INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT
For excellence in the preparation and issuance of its budget for the Fiscal Year 2015-2016.
The budget adheres to the principles and standards of ASBO International’s Meritorious Budget Award criteria.
Mark C. Pepera, MBA, RSBO, SFO John D. Musso, CAE, RSBA President Executive Director
18
19
Conroe Independent School District
20
Organization Section
Fine Arts
CTE
Guidance and Counseling Cipolla
Ass
ista
nt
Su
per
inte
nd
ent
for
Sec
on
dar
y E
du
cati
on
Sch
oo
lsPrincipals
Sch
oo
lsPrincipals
Mathematics
Early Childhood/Language Arts PK-6
Natatorium
Health & Physical Education
Social Studies/ROTC/Junior Achievement
Science
Student Support Services
Special Education
Special Education
Lead Nurse
Special Education
Bilingual/ESL
Special Education
Special Education
Dyslexia
Gifted Programs
Language Arts 7-12/Advanced Programs/LOTE
Hu
man
Res
ou
rces
D
irec
tor
Orga
niza
tiona
l Cha
rtC
ISD
Bo
ard
of
Tru
stee
s
Inte
rnal
Au
dit
or
Ass
ista
nt
Dir
ecto
r
Ele
men
tary
Ed
uca
tio
n
Dir
ecto
r
Ass
ista
nt
Su
per
inte
nd
ent
for
Ele
men
tary
Ed
uca
tio
n
Fed
eral
Pro
gra
ms,
Co
mp
lian
ce &
Gra
nts
Dir
ecto
r
Ath
leti
csD
irec
tor
Ass
essm
ent
and
Ev
alu
atio
nD
irec
tor
Com
mu
nit
y O
utr
each
P
rogr
ams
Dir
ecto
r/
New
com
er C
ente
r
Sp
ecia
l E
du
cati
on
Dir
ecto
r
Cu
rric
ulu
m,
Inst
ruct
ion
, an
d S
taff
D
evel
op
men
t D
irec
torDis
tric
t-L
evel
Pla
nn
ing
an
dD
ecis
ion
-Mak
ing
Co
mm
itte
eC
hie
f o
f P
oli
ce
Ch
ief
Fin
anci
al O
ffic
erD
epu
ty S
up
erin
ten
den
to
f O
per
atio
ns
Pla
nn
ing
&
Co
nst
ruct
ion
Mai
nte
nan
ce &
Cu
sto
dia
l
Ch
ild
Nu
trit
ion
Co
mm
un
icat
ion
sG
rap
hic
s&
Pri
nti
ng
Pu
rch
asin
g &
W
areh
ou
se
Dep
uty
Su
per
inte
nd
ent
of
Sch
oo
ls
Su
per
inte
nd
ent
of
Sch
oo
ls
Gen
eral
Co
un
sel
Pay
roll
Acc
ou
nti
ng
Coo
rdin
ator
Coo
rdin
ator
Coo
rdin
ator
of B
enef
its
Ass
ista
nt
Dir
ecto
r
Sch
ool
Saf
ety
Coo
rdin
ator
/ Dis
tric
tH
eari
ng
Off
icer
Tra
nsp
ort
atio
n
Tec
hn
olo
gy
Info
rmat
ion
Sy
stem
s
Tec
hn
olo
gy
Net
wo
rk S
erv
ices
N
etw
ork
Ser
vic
es
Info
rmat
ion
s S
yst
ems
Inst
ruct
ion
al
Tec
hn
olo
gy
Ass
ista
nt
Dir
ecto
r
Ass
ista
nt
Dir
ecto
r
21
Conroe Independent School District
Vision Statement
Conroe Independent School District is a learning community united in its commitment to ensuring all students graduate with confidence and competence. The schools and communities work together to provide performance standards which can be applied to the real world. This is achieved through the implementation of quality in instruction, operations, and leadership.
Strategic Goals
1. Student Achievement and Post-secondary SuccessCISD will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare all students for graduationand post-secondary success.
2. Fiscal ResponsibilityCISD will maintain efficient and effective fiscal management of resources and operations tomaximize learning for all students.
3. Recruitment, Development, and Retention of StaffCISD will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for allstudents.
4. Parents and CommunityCISD will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all studentsthrough collaborative partnerships and unity of purpose.
5. Safe SchoolsCISD will strive to ensure a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for allstudents and staff.
6. TechnologyCISD will provide technology infrastructure, tools, and solutions to meet the administrativerequirements of the district and to maximize learning for all students.
7. CommunicationCISD will promote and enhance two-way communication among our staff and our communityto maximize the success of all students.
22
Conroe Independent School District 2016-2017 Strategic Plan
Overview
Conroe Independent School District has developed a District plan that serves to guide District and campus staff in
the attainment of the District’s vision and goals through a continuous cycle of improvement. This plan
encompasses the goals of the District, the annual performance objectives, the improvement strategies to achieve
each objective, the project manager(s) responsible for the oversight of each strategy, a timeline for ongoing
monitoring of the strategies, the resources needed to implement the identified strategies, the formative evaluation
of each strategy, and the summative indicator for each performance objective.
As part of the continuous improvement cycle, a comprehensive performance evaluation is conducted annually to
study multiple types of data on student performance and targeted outcomes, to analyze trends and patterns within
and across the data, and to identify causal factors. The results of the Annual Performance Report are used in the
development of the annual performance objectives and strategies that will ensure the attainment of the District’s
goals.
Student performance data on the State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness (STAAR) and additional
information from the Texas Accountability System, the Performance Based Monitoring System (PBMAS), and INOVA
provided the preponderance of data for the annual District performance evaluation. Other sources of information
include the input of parents, community, business leaders, administrators and teachers through the District-Level
Planning and Decision-Making Committee, the PTO and PTA Presidents’ Council, the campus principals and
teachers, the curriculum and instruction teams, and the superintendent’s cabinet. A comprehensive demographic
study conducted by Population and Survey Analysts (PASA) also provided strategic planning information for our
student enrollment projections.
23
District Improvement Plan 2016-2017
Rating: Met Standard
Goal 1: Student Achievement and Post-Secondary Success Conroe ISD will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare all students for graduation and post-secondary success. Master Rigorous Academic Standards
Index 1: Student Achievement All subjects; all students meet STAAR satisfactory standard. Index 2: Student Progress Reading and Math; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted progress. Campus Academic Achievement Distinction Designation (AADD) indicator in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Science, and
Social Studies. K-8: Based on performance in top quartile for 50% of measures; HS: Based on performance in top quartile for 33% of measures
Campus Greater than Expected Growth (AADD Indicator) in Reading and Math Campus Top 25% Distinction, Top 25% of campus comparison group in Student Progress for Index 2
Close the Performance Gap Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps All subjects; eco dis and up to two of the lowest performing racial/ethnic group(s)
from the previous year; weighted performance rate (Level II and Level III) Campus Top 25% Distinction: Top 25% of campus comparison group in Closing Performance Gaps on Index 3
Successful Completion of High School Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness 4-year/5-year Graduation Rate (or annual dropout rate, if no graduation rate), all
students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; RHSP/DAP annual rate, all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups; SAT/ACT, AP Algebra 1; STAAR % met final level II standard on two or more tests, all students, 7 race/ethnic groups, combined over all subject areas; Post-Secondary Indicator Score.
District Postsecondary Readiness Distinction
GOAL 1: STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT AND POST-SECONDARY SUCCESS
MASTER RIGOROUS ACADEMIC STANDARDS - Index1: STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT, Index 2: STUDENT PROGRESS CLOSE THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP and INDEX 3: CLOSING PERFORMANCE GAPS
Core Analysis CISD Curriculum & Best Practices
Conroe ISD disaggregates and analyzes performance on Texas Statewide Assessments (STAAR, TELPAS, PBMAS): by content, grade, campus (all students), student groups (African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, White, two or More Races, Economically Disadvantaged, ELLs, and Students with Disabilities), and by program (Special Education, Bilingual or ESL, Gifted and Talented, Migrant, CTE, Dyslexia) to determine target areas of improvement. Conroe ISD implements the CISD Curriculum, which is aligned with the TEKS and has integrated the English Language Proficiency Standards (ELPS), College and Career Readiness Standards (CCRS), and the Technology Applications TEKS for grades K-12. The curriculum establishes rigorous standards through the depth and complexity of the content, processes, and assessment.
The Reading/ELA curriculum, CISD Reads, is a balanced literacy model that includes the instructional components of phonemic awareness, phonics, semantics and syntax, reading /thinking together, shared reading, guided reading, strategic reading, independent reading, modeled writing, shared writing, interactive writing, guided writing, and independent writing.
The Mathematics curriculum, CISD Solves, is a balanced math model that ensures the development of computational skills, mathematical reasoning and problem-solving abilities, conceptual understanding, and demonstration of mathematical understanding in a variety of assessment formats. CISD Solves includes the use of math review, mental math, problem solving, poster method, and math fluency. All mathematical skills are taught from a concrete, conceptual level to pictorial model representations and ending with the abstract numerical representation.
The Science curriculum, CISD Investigates, includes the use of the 5-E lesson model (Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, and Evaluate), Marzano’s Six Step Process for Building Academic Vocabulary to build an understanding of science vocabulary, Science Interactive Notebooks, and Science Success, the review process.
The Social Studies curriculum, CISD Remembers, includes engagement through student centered instructional strategies based on History Alive! or Social Studies Alive!, integrates content literacy strategies K-12 and emphasizes the roles and responsibilities of global citizenship by recognizing the
24
interconnectedness between global issues and the actions and decisions of ordinary citizens. The Interactive Student Notebook is a component of the Social Studies Model for all students grades K-12.
Conroe ISD implements and supports the following CISD best practices:
The Curriculum and Instruction Model (Conroe ISD Instructional Model) accommodates for the needs of all student populations through Tier 1 best practices of differentiating the content, process, product, and environment, and ensures that all students construct multiple representations of learning. The CISD Instructional Model incorporates the foundational research of Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences, Cooperative Learning, Brain-Based Learning, Understanding Poverty, and Marzano’s Research of Nine Instructional Strategies of Effective Teaching and Building Academic Vocabulary. The three components of the CISD Instructional Model include the alignment of the TEKS, the students’ Learning process of the required curriculum, and the ongoing Assessment in which both teachers and students evaluate their learning.
Tier I Differentiated Instruction is provided to all students and all student groups through strategies, techniques and resources that include tiered assignments, flexible groupings, anchor activities, scaffolding, frequent monitoring, Bloom’s Taxonomy of Critical Thinking, Quality Questioning, Thinking Maps, CRISS and Sheltered Instruction Using the SIOP Model.
Response to Intervention (RtI) is addressed through Tier I best practices for all students. Tier II and Tier III are more targeted, research-based interventions to meet the needs of individual students.
Gifted services are provided to students identified in alignment with CISD’s curriculum that provide challenging learning experiences and result in the creation of advanced-level products.
Dyslexia services are provided to students who meet the district guidelines for qualification as a student with dyslexia using Neuhaus dyslexia materials, an Orton Gillingham-based program. The qualification assessments and interventions are aligned with the Texas Dyslexia Handbook, Revised 2014.
Individualized Education Plans are designed to personalize learning based on student data and are used to inform instructional decisions and strategies with the goal of maximum access to the general curriculum.
Index 1: STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT OBJECTIVE
Index 1: Student Achievement In 2015-2016, 85% of All students combined over all subject areas met Level II standard. In 2021-2022, 90% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard on STAAR. The 2016-2017 incremental progress will be 2%.
INDEX 2: STUDENT PROGRESS OBJECTIVES
Index 2: Student Progress Reading and Math; all students, seven racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted progress In 2015-2016, the Index 2 Score was 42. In 2016-2017, the Index 2 Score will be 50.
READING/ELA Strategies
READING/ELA CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION AND STAFF DEVELOPMENT
Provide training, support and materials for teachers with various researched based instructional strategies to address the unique academic needs of gifted and talented, special education, current and monitored ELLs, African American, and economically disadvantaged students in reading. (DSG)
Ensure greater emphasis in reading on critical analysis rather than literal understanding for all students and all student groups.
Provide staff development for teachers on organizing and facilitating small group instruction using short pieces of text to teach reading and reading strategies designed for students not reading on grade-level.
Implement small group reading instruction, using short, accessible texts, tracking student progress for all student populations, specifically those students receiving special education services, using anecdotal notes and implementing effective accommodations, support for RtI, and “customized” tutorial programs. (DSG)
Provide continued staff development for bilingual and ESL teachers in the areas of Spanish Word Study, building Spanish fluency and comprehension.(K-6)
Provide resources and staff development in addressing the reading and understanding of literary and informational text using higher level questioning strategies on the use of and instruction of
25
informational text: expository, persuasive and procedural in the classroom and how to help students demonstrate the ability to access, comprehend and analyze these texts (targeting Reporting Category 3 on STAAR assessed curriculum). (DSG)
Provide supplemental instructional material and professional development to support pre-kindergarten Spanish phonics development through the instructional resource Estrellita.
Provide supplemental reading instructional resources and staff development for campuses with identified at-risk student groups.
Provide staff development, resources and support at eight pilot campuses to increase instructional practices and student reading performance in the area of K-2 reading.
Provide continued staff development and support through use of district instructional coaches on Seidlitz’s Seven Steps to a Language Rich Interactive Classroom for Second Language Acquisition of ELL’s
Provide staff development on how to implement strategies to help students better respond to the short answer questions that are included in the STAAR EOC reading assessments.
Support the integration of technology in language arts.
Support the emphasis on College Readiness and Advanced Academics through elementary and secondary ELA content.
WRITING Strategies
WRITING CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION AND STAFF DEVELOPMENT
Provide staff development on the use of Writer’s Workshop to provide explicit instruction in writing focusing on developing the writer in addition to the writing, and supported with the Lucy Calkins Units of Study in Writing. (DSG)
Continue to provide strategies and staff development on the reciprocal aspects of reading and writing for grades 5 and 6.
Implementation of and training in a new genre based writing curriculum serving both Bilingual and Monolingual students to support instruction in all genres of writing. (DSG)
Provide strategies and staff development to support the focus on how to incorporate grammar in the context of writing, how to help students develop skill and craft in the revision process of writing, and how to move students from formulaic to authentic approaches in all modes of writing. (DSG)
Provide staff development for teachers on the inclusion of and teaching of Literary, Expository, and/or Persuasive writing.
Implement and staff develop the Writer’s Workshop approach to the teaching of writing, focusing on developing the writer in addition to the writing.
MATH Strategies
MATH CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION AND STAFF DEVELOPMENT
Provide training and support for teachers with various researched based instructional strategies to address the unique academic needs of special education and current and monitored ELL students in math. (DSG)
Provide staff development for all math teachers in identifying individual academic needs of all student populations and using Differentiated Instruction to develop math strategies to modify for identified gifted math students and/or close learning gaps, such as vocabulary strategies using graphic organizers, math centers for anchor activities, and use of technology to improve skills, fact fluency, and problem solving strategies.
Monitor and reinforce implementation of the CISD Solves Math Structure.
Provide staff development and continuous classroom support to special education and general education co-teachers in math in Tier I Differentiated Instruction strategies. (DSG)
Continue to provide strategies and staff development in the use of age appropriate algebra readiness skills as part of CISD Solves Math Structure.
Provide staff development for development and implementation of common formative assessments to assist in monitoring achievement, including matching rigor of the questions to the requirements of the TEKS, using data to write and review common assessment items, and focusing on the benefits of teacher collaboration when developing and reviewing common assessments.
26
Continue the emphasis on small group math instruction including Guided Math, trackingindividual progress through documentation (including At-Risk in mathematics) using anecdotalnotes and implementation of effective tutorial programs for teachers K-12.
Provide staff development in the incorporation of writing in the mathematics class and usingliterature and “math talk” in problem-solving activities for teachers K-12 as part of the CISDSolves Math Structure.
Provide targeted staff development in curriculum support for novice teachers in implementationof the CISD Solves Math Structure.
Provide staff development for teachers to enhance rigorous instruction through grade levelteam meetings.
Continue staff development for all math teachers on meeting the needs of African American,LEP, and special education students. (DSG)
Provide training and support for teachers with various researched based instructional strategiesto address immigrant student’s academic need in mathematics.
Build teacher capacity to ensure strong foundational best practices in math instruction for K, 1,and 2 math teachers.
Provide staff development to increase understanding with the math TEKS with a heightenedfocus on grades 5 through 8.
Ensure that teachers expect and encourage all students and all student groups to constructmultiple representations of learning in math including the use of manipulative models.
Provide staff development to ensure that processes standards are being incorporated in dailymathematics instruction.
SOCIAL STUDIES Strategies
SOCIAL STUDIES CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION AND STAFF DEVELOPMENT
Integrate content literacy strategies K-12 with Pre-Reading, During Reading and After Readingsupport from the Social Studies Strategy Manual.
Implement and provide training on the Interactive Student Notebook K-12.
Emphasize the roles and responsibilities of global citizenship by recognizing theinterconnectedness between global issues and the actions and decisions of ordinary citizens.
Align instruction for social studies processing skills focusing on analyzing primary sources andinterpreting information.
Design units based on enduring understandings that answer essential questions.
Ensure that teachers plan and implement social studies lessons based on the district scope andsequence CISD Remembers.
Work with campus teams for the development and implementation of common formativeassessments to assist in monitoring achievement, including matching rigor of the questions tothe requirements of the TEKS. (DSG)
Use data to write and review common assessments, and focusing on the benefits of teachercollaboration when developing and reviewing common assessments.
Support Newcomer’s Sheltered Instruction Model for World Geography piloted at 9th gradecampuses.
Collaboration between the ESL and SS District Instructional Coaches to provide targetedintervention for novice teachers.
Continued supporting trainings to target campuses on Seidltz’s Seven Steps to a Language RichInteractive Classroom
Work with the Bilingual and ESL Programs department to provide staff development on TELPASdata disaggregation and the use of ELPS in Social Studies and academic content area vocabularyinstruction. (DSG)
Staff development provided to the campus to focus on the development of language and literacyskills for Long-Term ELLS in core content areas Talk, Read, Talk Write and 7 Steps to a languagerich interactive classroom. (DSG)
27
SCIENCE Strategies
SCIENCE CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION AND STAFF DEVELOPMENT
Ensure that teachers plan and implement TEKS aligned science lessons using the 5-E lesson model (Engage, Explore, Explain, Elaborate, and Evaluate).
Improve vocabulary building in science through the Science Word of the Week (WOW) for elementary and intermediate grades, Science Interactive Word Walls in elementary and secondary classrooms, and the use of Marzano Words in the Scope and Sequences.
Implement collaboratively developed science common assessments with TEKS aligned questions that assess at a high level of cognitive complexity.
Ensure that teachers require all students to utilize a Science Interactive Notebook as part of their learning process.
Implement CISD Science Success in grades 5-12, an intervention strategy to help close achievement gaps within student groups through the review of science process skills and reinforcement of science concepts identified on assessments.
Incorporate strategies to support writing in science as a means of synthesizing learning.
Collaboration between the Science Department and Bilingual/ESL Department to train science teachers in the development of language and literacy skills for ELLS in Talk Read, Talk Write.
Collaboration between the Science District Instructional Coaches and Special Education Staff to provide targeted intervention for teachers of Special Education students. (DSG)
Collaboration between the Science Department and Special Education Staff to provide targeted intervention for teachers of Special Education students. (DSG)
Collaboration between the Science Department and the Dyslexia Staff to provide targeted intervention for teachers of students with dyslexia. (DSG)
Index 3: CLOSING PERFORMANCE GAPS OBJECTIVES
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps All subjects; economically disadvantaged and up to two of the lowest performing racial/ethnic group(s) from the previous year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) In 2015-2016, the Index 3 Score was 46 and included the student groups of Eco Dis, African American, and Hispanic. In 2016-2017, the Index 3 Score will be 50 and will include the student groups of Eco Dis, African American, and Pacific Islander.
Program Focus Strategies
STRATEGIES AND PROGRAMS
Continue evening credit recovery classes for students (including LEP, ESL, Immigrant, Migrant, Homeless, Foster, and other at-risk students).
Raise the quality of Prekindergarten instructional practices through the implementation of the High Quality Pre-K Grant from the state of Texas, adding additional targeted staff development, family engagement opportunities, and additional resources in classrooms.
Identify LEP/SPED/CTE students who need assistance to improve their performance on the Reading/English Language Arts, Math, Social Studies, and Science STAAR tests and provide tutorial sessions prior to the scheduled testing dates with specialized instruction.
Continue the implementation of the CISD English Language Acquisition Bilingual Education model in grades Pre- Kindergarten through 6.
Provide all Bilingual Kindergarten teachers with Canciones y Cuentos, a supplemental instructional tool to help develop phonological awareness skills in their native language.
Implement the use of Leer Mas Spanish literacy instructional strategies to help build a strong native language foundation for bilingual students.
Provide all bilingual teachers in grades K-6 access to the Supplemental Resource Guide for the ELA curriculum which includes model lessons, recommended reading lists, formative assessments, and instructional strategies to help facilitate the implementation of the genre based curriculum.
Continue the implementation of Imagine Learning, a supplemental computer-based program to assist ELLs with the academic content language skills needed for success.
Continue the implementation of the secondary curriculum support guide for all core content areas at CHS 9th grade campuses and CHS senior campus with a continued focus on sheltered best practices for second language acquisition of immigrant ELLs.
Provide intensive, systematic, multisensory, research-based reading instruction to identified students with dyslexia.
28
Provide intensive, sustained support of at-risk pregnant students through coordination of home instruction; counseling services; childcare; transportation of parent/child; career counseling; job readiness training; connections with community and government services; and instruction in child development and parenting to ensure students master STAAR.
Provide intensive instructional tutorial programs for at-risk students, individualized to meet the unique needs of the students and student groups at each campus before school hours, during, after school hours, and/or on Saturday, in the core content areas of Reading, English Language Arts, Math, Writing, Science and Social Studies, as identified in campus plans.
Provide materials, equipment, transportation from tutorials/home, and software for at-risk students to facilitate academic improvement in content areas.
Provide an academic alternative campus for secondary at-risk students (all students meeting one or more of the state/local criteria for at-risk) to ensure mastery of TEKS. (DSG)
Provide intensive, research-based instructional strategies for identified immigrant and special education students through direct instruction and modeling of instructional strategies in all content areas for teachers of immigrant and special education students. (DSG)
Provide a Discipline Alternative Educational Placement for students placed through mandatory or discretionary placement for disciplinary infractions with an academic focus aligned to the student’s home campus.
Provide credit recovery programs for at-risk students as identified in secondary campus plans.
Provide paraprofessionals to assist teachers who address the academic needs of at-risk students. (DSG)
Provide additional campus teachers for intensive instruction for secondary at-risk students who failed one or more core courses.
Provide elementary/intermediate/secondary teachers and coaches to accelerate the learning of at-risk students. (DSG)
Provide summer school for Title I students in grades 1 through 6, Grade 1 and 2 Bilingual students, and other at-risk students to improve reading ability of at-risk students to on-level by end of 3rd grade and to maintain on-level. Credit recovery for grades 7-12, initial and accelerated credit for grades 7-12, a STAAR Academy for 7th, 8th grade reading and math, an EOC Accelerated Instruction Course for Science, Math, Language Arts, and Social Studies, math and science students. (DSG)
Provide intensive instruction for secondary at-risk students through reduced class size at a high at-risk campus. (DSG)
Continue the Principles of Technology class in District high schools as an alternative to Physics I for students needing additional math support and who learn better in an applied environment.
Support the PASS Program for at risk students overage for their grade level by providing curriculum, instruction, staff development and support utilizing PASS Teachers, PASS Managers, and Curriculum and Instruction staff.
Closely track and monitor migrant student’s performance to ensure academic success.
Provide professional development and support for teachers with evidence based instructional strategies, universal design for learning and positive behavior supports to address the unique academic needs of student with disabilities in all content areas. (DSG)
Provide Teaching Up! 3-part series of staff development at the elementary and secondary level to include instructional strategies that challenge ALL students with rigor, depth/complexity and creative thinking.
Prepare teachers with an in-depth understanding of how to align curriculum, instruction and assessment for students with disabilities. (DSG)
Provide GT staff development in the area of Nature and Needs to under-identified campuses. STAFF DEVELOPMENT
Provide staff development in data analysis and strategies for Differentiated Instruction to increase representation of African American and Hispanic students in advanced courses (Pre-AP, AP) in all content areas.
Provide staff development to all special education teachers in the Standards Based IEP Process.
Provide staff development to focus on student access and progress related to the general curriculum academic content standards for students with disabilities
29
Provide training on designing and implementing accommodations and modifications to facilitate access to the general curriculum.
Provide staff development on the effective use of In Class Support Models and Strategies for students with disabilities.
Provide training on Differentiating Instruction and Formative Assessments for students with disabilities.
Provide training on effect five strategies for students with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD).
Provide staff development for Structured Teaching for students with significant cognitive disabilities, specifically low incidence populations.
Provide staff development focusing on the nature and needs of and differentiation of curriculum for gifted students and students with disabilities to better support their achievement in all academic settings.
Provide systematic, sustained in-class support and staff development for Special Education teachers and paraprofessionals by focusing on the successful implementation of CISD’s core content initiatives to foster a rigorous, differentiated, developmentally appropriate classroom environment to increase student achievement.
Provide systematic, sustained in-class support and staff development for Prekindergarten and Kindergarten teachers by focusing on the successful implementation of CISD’s core content initiatives to foster a rigorous, differentiated, developmentally appropriate classroom environment to increase student achievement.
Provide staff development for teachers in cultural diversity and working with students from poverty.
Provide staff development in Positive Behavior Interventions and Support to address behavior Tier I best practices, classroom management, and behavior management.
Provide continued training and support for the LPAC decision-making process on alignment of STAAR and STAAR-L assessments.
Provide continued training and support in the LPAC and ARD collaboration process. (DSG)
Provide on-going training and support for Seidlitz’s Seven Steps to a Language-Rich Interactive Classroom. (DSG)
Provide on-going training on the cross-curricular implementation of the English Language Proficiency Standards, specifically related to how to deliver small group instruction based on individual students’ English language proficiency levels. (DSG)
Provide on-going training and support for core content teachers assigned to the secondary pilot curriculum guide. (DSG)
Provide continued training on the use of linguistic accommodations for ELLs based on their level of English language development in the classroom during daily instruction and assessments. (DSG)
Provide staff development for reading intervention teachers who deliver dyslexia intervention as well as staff development for teachers about how they can support struggling readers and students with dyslexia in their classrooms.
READING/ELA Performance Objectives
READING/ELA CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION & STAFF DEVELOPMENT In 2015-2016, 70% of the Eco Dis students, 73% of the African American student group, and 76% of the Hispanic student group met Level II standard. In addition, 12% of Eco Dis students, 15% of the African American student group, and 19% of the Hispanic student group met Level III standard. In 2016-2017 90% of Eco Dis students, 90%of the African American student group, and 90% of the Pacific Islander student group will meet Level II standard. In addition, 50% of Eco Dis students, 50% of the African American student group, and 50% of the Pacific Islander student group will meet Level III standard. Target Reading/ELA Reporting Category : 3 Reading/ELA Performance Safeguard Target: Special Education
Focus Strategies Provide intensive, systematic, research-based accelerated reading instruction for identified at-risk students through direct instruction for students and modeling instructional strategies in reading for teachers of at-risk students
Collaboration between the ELA District Instructional Coaches and Special Education Staff to provide targeted intervention for teachers of students receiving special education services. (DSG)
30
WRITING Performance Objectives
WRITING CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION & STAFF DEVELOPMENT In 2015-2016, 65% of Eco Dis students, 71% of the African American student group, and 72% of the Hispanic student group met Level II standard. In addition, 9% of Eco Dis students, 15% of the African American student group, and 14% of the Hispanic student group met Level III standard. In 2016-2017 90% of Eco Dis students, 90% of the African American student group, and 90% of the Pacific Islander student group will meet Level II standard. In addition, 50% of Eco Dis students, 50% of the African American student group, and 50% of the Pacific Islander student group will meet Level III standard. Target Writing Reporting Category: 4 Writing Performance Safeguard Target: Special Education ELL Current and Monitored
Focus Strategies Provide training and support for teachers with various research-based instructional strategies to address ELL and special education students’ academic needs in writing.
Continue to provide strategies and staff development on the reciprocal aspects of reading and writing.
Collaboration between the ELA District Instructional Coaches and Special Education Staff to provide targeted intervention for teachers of students receiving special education services. (DSG)
MATH Performance Objectives
MATH CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION & STAFF DEVELOPMENT In 2015-2016, 76% of Eco Dis students, 76% of the African American student group, and 82% of the Hispanic student group met Level II standard. In addition, 15% of Eco Dis students, 16% of the African American student group, and 23% of the Hispanic student group met Level III standard. In 2016-2017 90% of Eco Dis students, 90% of the African American 90% of student group, and 90% of the Pacific Islander student group will meet Level II standard. In addition, 50% of Eco Dis students, 50% of African American student group, and 50% of student group will meet Level III standard. Target Math Reporting Category: 2 Math Performance Safeguard Target: Special Education
Focus Strategies Provide intensive, systematic, research-based accelerated math instruction for identified at-risk students through direct instruction for students and modeling of instructional strategies in math for teachers of at-risk students.
The classroom teacher will provide small flexible grouping through Guided Math or small group instruction, tiered assignments and anchor stations to add value to all students.
Build teacher capacity to create more student-driven instruction in alignment with T-TESS goals.
Collaboration between the Math District Instructional Coaches and Special Education Staff to provide targeted intervention for teachers of student receiving special education services. (DSG)
SOCIAL STUDIES Index 3: CLOSING PERFORMANCE GAPS OBJECTIVES
SOCIAL STUDIES CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION & STAFF DEVELOPMENT In 2015-2016, 76% of Eco Dis students, 79% of the African American student group, and 82% of the Hispanic student group met Level II standard. In addition, 18% of Eco Dis students, 23% of the African American student group, and 27% of the Hispanic student group met Level III standard. In 2016-2017 90% of Eco Dis students, 90% of the African American student group, and 90% of the Pacific Islander student group will meet Level II standard. In addition, 50% of Eco Dis students, 50% of the African American student group, and 50% of the Pacific Islander student group will meet Level III standard. Target Social Studies Reporting Category: 1 History Safeguard Target: Special Education and ELL Current and Monitored
Focus Strategies Provide intensive, systematic, research-based Social Studies interventions for identified at-risk students.
Implement the Social Studies Model best practices in direct instruction for students and model instructional strategies in Social Studies Skills and Content Literacy for teachers during professional development opportunities.
Ensure a vertical alignment of skills and government/citizenship concepts K-12 through the CISD Remembers Scope and Sequence.
31
Collaboration between the Social Studies District Instructional Coaches and Special Education Staff to provide targeted intervention for teachers of students receiving special education services. (DSG)
Provide a District Instructional coach to campuses with high ELL populations. Provide specific vocabulary acquisition and mastery strategies in a professional development session empathizing increased performance of ELL students. (DSG)
SCIENCE Index 3: CLOSING PERFORMANCE GAPS OBJECTIVES
SCIENCE CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION & STAFF DEVELOPMENT In 2015-2016, 79% of Eco Dis students, 80% of the African American student group, and 84% of the Hispanic student group met Level II standard. In addition, 12% of Eco Dis students, 14% of the African American student group, and 19% of the Hispanic student group met Level III standard. In 2016-2017 90% of Eco Dis students, 90% of the African American student group, and 90% of the Pacific Islander student group will meet Level II standard. In addition, 50% of Eco Dis students, 50% of the African American student group, and 50% of the Pacific Islander student group will meet Level III standard. Target Science Reporting Category: Biology - Reporting Category 2 (Mechanisms of Genetics) and Reporting Category 4 (Biological Processes and Systems); 8th Grade- Reporting Category 2 (Force, Motion, and Energy); 5th Grade- Reporting Category 1 (Matter and Energy) and Reporting Category 3(Earth and Space) Safeguard Target: Special Education
Focus Strategies Collaboration between the Science Department and Special Education Staff to provide targeted intervention for teachers of students receiving special education services. (DSG)
Collaboration between the Science Department and the Dyslexia Staff to provide targeted intervention for teachers of students with Dyslexia. (DSG)
HEALTH Performance Objective
HEALTH CURRICULUM, INSTRUCTION & STAFF DEVELOPMENT 80% of all students will meet a minimum of one Healthy Fitness Zone standard, as measured by the FitnessGram assessment.
Focus Strategies To ensure that 50% of class time, students are engaged in Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA).
To integrate core content curriculum into physical education curriculum.
To develop quality physical education programs that are developmentally and sequentially appropriate.
To ensure a safe and enjoyable climate for all students.
To provide state approved Coordinated School Health components into the curriculum.
To ensure that physical activity is not used as a punishment.
To ensure that student/teacher ratios meet the state standards.
SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF HIGH SCHOOL POSTSECONDARY READINESS (Index 4) DISTINCTIONS AND SAFEGUARD INDICATORS Index 4: POSTSECONDARY READINESS OBJECTIVES
INDEX 4: POSTSECONDARY READINESS In 2015-2016 80% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups met postsecondary readiness standards. In 2016-2017 85% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet postsecondary standard on STAAR assessments. 4-Year/5-Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate 96% of students (all students, Sp Ed, ELL students, and 7 race/ethnic groups) will graduate on the four-year or five-year graduation plan. 4-Year/5-Year Longitudinal RHSP/DAP Rate 90% of students (all students and 7 race/ethnic groups) will graduate on the RHSP/DAP Plan. Postsecondary Indicator Score (college-ready graduates) 75% of students (all students, Sp Ed, ELL students, and 7 race/ethnic groups) will:
o meet or exceed the TSI criteria in both ELA and mathematics on the TAKS exit-level test, SAT, or ACT; or
o complete and earn credit on at least two advanced/dual credit enrollment courses; or o enroll in a CTE-Coherent Sequence of courses (including the Tech Prep program)
32
Meet eligible Campus Academic Achievement Distinction Designations (AADD) 3-8 50% of indicators will be in top quartile at each campus HS 33% of indicators will be in top quartile at each campus Grade 3-12 Safeguard Indicators
Safeguard Target for Participation Rate (if applicable): Met Safeguard Target for Federal Graduation Rate (if applicable): Met
Safeguard Target for 1% and 2% Limits on Use of STAAR Alt 2 (if applicable): Met
Focus Strategies DROPOUT PREVENTION PROGRAM
Utilize consistent procedures for all campuses to identify, intervene, and monitor the progressof at-risk students, PK – 12.
Utilize procedures and strategies within the at-risk manual to assist in meeting the needs ofstudents in at-risk situations.
Provide staff development for teachers and staff in the instructional needs of studentsidentified as at-risk. (DSG)
Maintain the variety of credit recovery opportunities for secondary students who are over agefor grade level, including night school.
Provide systematic collaboration among departments participating in dropout preventionefforts. (DSG)
Provide crisis and violence prevention programs and counseling and crisis intervention for at-risk students.
Continue collaboration with community agencies such as Montgomery County Youth Servicesand Montgomery County Women’s Center, and to identify and seek similar connections withother agencies in order to meet the needs of CISD students.
Identify and monitor homeless students and provide community campus resource informationas needed to ensure student success.
Identify and provide support to junior high school students who are behind in math andreading.
Implementation of RtI at all grade levels to identify and provide interventions to supportstudents struggling in the areas of Languages Arts and Math, and Behavior.
Continue to use and refine usage of recently added career exploration programs, such as web–based programs like Hobson’s Naviance/Family Connection, and My Road, a Career searchprogram offered by College Board.
Continue expansion of licenses/certification offered to and earned by Career and TechnicalEducation (CTE) students in CISD CTE courses.
Continue expansion of Career and Technical Education (CTE) Dual Credit and AdvancedTechnical Credit opportunities offered to and earned by Career and Technical Education (CTE)students in CISD CTE courses.
Provide support for students who are parents to stay in school and graduate, includingparenting education and academic support during post-delivery.
Decrease the number of In School Suspension, Out of School Suspension and discretionaryplacements and repeaters in DAEP for specific student groups: African American, Hispanic,economic disadvantaged and special education. (DSG)
Identify and provide support for at-risk 9-12 grade students through the STAR program byincorporating personal support, college and career information and investigation andcommunity service projects.
Monitor and assist campuses in tracking and locating school leavers and potential dropouts forspecial education. (DSG)
Provide support to the PASS program for at-risk overage students.
Continue utilizing Social Workers and Social Services Liaison’s to recover drop-outs and workwith at-risk students with disabilities. (DSG)
Identify and monitor Newcomers, providing training to parents and students regarding theeducational system.
Continue training on transition planning with students, staff and parents to help students withdisabilities achieve post-secondary goals. (DSG)
33
Provide instruction and services to students with disabilities in age appropriate environments through the Adult Transition Program.
ATTENDANCE
Review, revise, and implement daily attendance procedures to meet 96% average attendance (migrant, foster and homeless students shall receive special consideration).
Ensure each campus has a plan to meet accountability attendance expectations of 95% on testing days (participation).
Communicate the attendance laws to parents annually.
Utilize auto-dialing phone system for contacting parents of student’s absence.
Increase the percentage of students completing high school in four years. COLLEGE READINESS Advanced Courses
Ensure core content area Advanced Placement and Pre-Advanced Placement course offerings at all secondary campuses for all students and student groups.
Use of Blackboard Connect and brochures to increase student and parent awareness of advanced programs, testing opportunities and benefits for post-secondary education.
Provide more dual credit courses at all high schools through a collaborative agreement with Lone Star College Montgomery.
Increase the number of students taking dual credit courses at all high schools.
Expand to more high school campuses the Accelerated College Program where students can earn an Associate’s degree while in high school.
Increase the number of students taking AP Exams in grades 11 and 12 (with an expectation that students enrolled in the AP class will take the AP Exam).
Increase the number of AP examinations with scores of 3, 4, and 5 in all subjects and at all secondary campuses.
Increase the number of students in all ethnic groups taking AP courses to more accurately reflect the diversity of each campus.
Continue a District-wide AP Prep Conference to prepare students for success on AP exams.
Ensure that teachers teaching Pre-AP and AP regularly attend training opportunities for advanced placement and pre-advanced placement.
Provide and use campus-based Advanced Programs Facilitators to coordinate and monitor advanced courses/programs and college readiness efforts.
Graduation Plans
Monitor current students on the 4 x 4 plan, and continue implementing the foundation graduation program with rising 9th and current 9th, 10th and 11th graders. Current students may also opt into the foundation program.
Build and monitor 4-year plans for all high school students.
Monitor LEP, special education, and CTE 4-year graduation plans on all high school campuses.
Increase awareness of Career Pathways for all students in grades 7-12.
Continue to hold a District Career Expo to increase awareness of Career Pathways for all students in grades 7-12.
College Admissions and Readiness
Maintain a rigorous curriculum that is aligned with PSAT, SAT, ACT, and EOC examinations.
Continue PSAT, SAT, ACT, and Texas Success Initiative Assessment preparation courses for high school students.
Increase the number of students taking the SAT by paying for 8th grade students to take the PSAT 8/9 and 10th and 11th grade students to take the PSAT.
Increase the number of students taking the SAT by paying for 10th and 11th grade students to take the PSAT.
Conduct campus summer programs and workshops to assist students with the college application protocol and process.
Continue to assist students in determining career interests, career pathways, and post-secondary choices.
34
Continue to hold a District College Fair in conjunction with the TACRAO (Texas Association ofCollegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers) schedule.
Provide and use campus-based College Readiness Teams to evaluate, set goals, and monitorprogress of campus college readiness initiatives.
Higher Education Readiness
Provide timely information, test preparation and TSI testing opportunities for students to meetcollege entrance and placement requirements.
Increase the percentage of students demonstrating college readiness on ACT, SAT, STAAR andthe TSI Assessment.
Financial Resources General Operating, Elementary and Secondary State Compensatory Education Funds Title Funds IDEA, Part B High School Allotment Funds
Additional Resources Teacher Cadres and Coaches Curriculum: CISD Instructional Model, CISD Reads, CISD Solves, CISD Investigates, CISD Remembers, CISD English Language Acquisition Model for Bilingual Education Programs, Gifted & Talented Assessment: STAAR, STAAR A, STAAR L, STAAR Alt, STAAR Alt 2, TELPAS, INOVA, District Benchmark Results, District Curriculum Checkpoints, Campus Common Assessments, Universal Screeners, Stanford, BAS, DRA, OS, QPS, PAPI, SAT, ACT, CogAT IOWA, Logramos Systems: View It, Eduphoria, Dashboard, Curriculum Heat Maps, INOVA, Quintiles, Campus Improvement Plans Hobson’s Naviance/Family Connection for building 4-year plans, and researching and planning college and career options My Road Staff Development
Formative November, January Summative July
Formative Evaluation Item analysis and data disaggregation of Benchmark assessments CISD Benchmarks at passing rate Staff Development: track number attending per campus; target for specific campus needs Cadres: track meeting attendance by campus (# general, special, and bilingual/ESL teachers) and follow-up campus delivery
Summative Evaluation
TEA Accountability Summary, TAPR, PBMAS, AMAOs, DVM, Special Education Evaluation
Project Manager(s): Curriculum, Instruction and Staff Development Department including Reading/ELA, Math, Science, Social Studies, Guidance and Counseling, College Readiness; Advanced Programs; CTE; Federal Programs; Dropout Prevention; Gifted & Talented, Bilingual/ESL; Student Support; Section 504, Dyslexia and Reading Intervention; Early Childhood; Special Education; Assessment, Accountability and Evaluation.
Goal 2 FISCAL RESPONSIBILIY
CISD will maintain efficient and effective fiscal management of resources and operations to maximize learning for all students.
Objective 2.1 Effective and Efficient Use of Financial Resources
Strategies Maintain high academic results in a cost effective manner. Implement long-range revenue and budget plans. Maintain a fund balance of 16% to 24%. Provide essential positions needed to accommodate growth in student population. Provide competitive compensation to attract and maintain quality personnel.
Objective 2.2 Successful Implementation of Capital Projects
35
Strategies Implement long-range master facilities plan. Conduct Bond Program Board Workshop. Continue to monitor student growth and adjust implementation timeline for capital projects, as
appropriate. Working with the CISD Board of Trustees.
Objective 2.3 Effective and Efficient Operations
Strategies Continue implementation of energy management program. Continue implementation of operations improvement plans. Continue to optimize campus allocations.
Financial Resources
General Fund, Fund Balance, Debt Service Fund, Capital Projects Fund, Special Revenue Funds: Food Service Fund; Instructional Materials Fund
Additional Resources Conroe ISD Employees
Monitoring Timeline
Formative November, January, February, April Summative July
Formative Evaluation
Financial Reports at Board meetings, Bond Update at Board meetings, Board Workshops
Summative Evaluation Meet Performance Indicators for FIRST Rating, , Texas Smart Schools, ERG, and District
Project Manager(s):
Primary: Chief Financial Officer, Deputy Superintendent of Operations Support: Accounting and Business Managers and Director of P&C
Goal 3 RECRUITMENT, DEVELOPMENT, AND RETENTION OF STAFF
CISD will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective 3.1 Recruitment of Staff
Strategies Ensure the appropriate certification for all professional and paraprofessional staff. Increase communication opportunities with high school students, minority candidates, shortage area
candidates, professionals, and paraprofessionals through partnerships with area colleges and universities, local Chambers of Commerce, College Educator Preparation Programs, CISD Education Foundation, and College Advisory Board(s).
Continue to offer and expand the CISD “Grow Our Own” initiative to increase the pool of applicants for bilingual professional positions and special education professional positions.
Ensure the CISD Recruitment Program is updated and includes revised recruiting materials, a variety of advertising, and training for all recruiters. Provide CISD link to colleges, universities, and education-related professional organizations.
Utilize university and regional service center data to assist in identification of critical certification shortage areas, critical teacher supply areas, and ACP local and state initiatives.
Participate in Region 4 Human Resources Services Assistance. Continue review of compensation incentives to attract applicants from outside CISD, as well as from
existing staff. Continually study the District’s ability to provide an ethnically and racially diverse staff, and continue to
develop a pool of minority applicants and shortage area applicants. Continue to develop pools of qualified candidates in specialized areas, such as school counselors,
academic shortage areas, and other designated pools. Coordinate the recruitment, selection, hiring, and campus placement of District pool of bilingual
teachers. Coordinate the recruitment selection, hiring, and campus placement of District pool of diagnosticians
and speech/language pathologists. Host the CISD Teacher Job Fair and the CISD Auxiliary Job Fair to encourage employment in CISD,
contingent upon staffing needs.
36
Host a fall and spring Student Teacher Reception to encourage professional employment in CISD and build on the pool of qualified substitutes.
Conduct meetings for the Council for Minority Recruitment & Retention. Maintain database on student teachers’ placement, and develop an evaluation for recruiting purposes. Conduct electronic surveys at professional new hire orientation meetings to collect feedback on the
CISD recruitment and hiring processes. Continue to provide Sam Houston State University field level experience placement in all areas of CISD. Continue to expand the FirstClass conference for principals and supervisors, which provides immediate
access to information such as staffing, funding sources, and pertinent documents relating to T-TESS, Eduphoria Appraise, AESOP, recruiting, interviewing, and other resources essential to streamlining HR’s role as it relates to the principals.
Continue to create instructional guides and training presentations for principals regarding frequently used programs such as Eduphoria, WinOcular, and AESOP.
Coordinate and assist with applicant screening, and participate on interview committees. Provide specialized training for campus and District administrators based on current needs. Continue to offer visits to college and university campuses to speak with pre-service teachers about
obtaining a teaching position and the benefits of living and working in CISD. Continue to provide informational sessions for District paraprofessionals and auxiliary employees who
are interested in obtaining their teaching certification. Update recruitment video, which encourages minority and shortage area candidates to work for CISD. Utilize current technology to streamline Human Resources processes, such as electronic contracts and
letters of reasonable assurance, use of iPads during applicant screening, and utilize Skype for interviews.
Utilize the Laserfiche/Docunav software to work toward paperless records management and electronic personnel records.
Redesign the Human Resources website to provide ease of access to pertinent information and a more attractive, modern layout for prospective employees.
Collaborate with the high school campus sponsors of the Texas Association of Future Educators (TAFE) organization to promote interest in the field of education among high school students in Conroe ISD.
Objective 3.2 Staff Development
Strategies Provide staff development and support for beginning teachers through The Novice Teacher Academy (NTA) for novice teachers with 0-1 years’ experience.
Continue to offer the Building Leadership Capacity Training Series to develop leadership skills in current positions or in preparation to become assistant principals, curriculum coordinators, counselors, diagnosticians, specialists or other leadership roles. The workshop training series is offered in two phases. Phase 1 is for individuals seeking Masters and/or Doctorate Degrees and Phase 2 is for individuals with Masters and/or Doctorate Degrees.
Support cohorts with universities to develop Master of Education and Doctoral programs for professional staff members.
Assist employees by providing content area materials to any CISD employee for assistance with passing the appropriate TExES exams.
Provide through HR access to Performance-based Academic Coaching Teams (PACT), which is a side developed by The Texas A&M University System and made possible by funds from the Department of Education and the Texas Education Agency to provide review materials for the PPR exam, along with a full line of support for novice and veteran teachers, teacher candidates, and administrators.
Continue to provide programs/scholarships to assist instructional aides in becoming certified teachers. Offer 2-day TExES ESL preparation workshop to CISD teachers seeking ESL endorsement. Provide partial reimbursement to teachers who add the ESL endorsement to their teaching certificate. Provide a pre-screening interview process for bilingual teacher applicants to verify the quality of
language dominance proficiency. Provide updated information and materials to teachers and administrators regarding implementation,
transition, and general requirements of T-TESS.
37
Provide opportunities for online staff development for instructional paraprofessionals and certified, long-term substitutes in best teaching practices to create a pool of knowledgeable, experienced teaching and instructional paraprofessional applicants for principals.
Create staff development modules that can be completed online to reduce the amount of time taken away from instruction on campuses.
Objective 3.3 Retention of Staff
Strategies Maintain a level of competitive salaries. Provide a benefits package to employees that is comparable to or better than that of our peer districts,
and provide access to the Conroe ISD Employee Health and Wellness Center at reduced costs. Provide option for employees to participate in a comprehensive Employee Wellness Program, and host
the annual Health Fair, which helps connect employees with health and wellness related providers in the community.
Conduct regular Substitute Feedback and Satisfaction Surveys. Retention of Novice Teacher Academy Participants ranges 90% or above. Greet new CISD teachers at the District’s New Teacher Staff Development Sessions to encourage
professional relationships with new staff. Maintain and analyze attrition data to identify trends by conducting an exit survey, which will be
designed to help the District make positive changes to reduce attrition.
Financial Resources
General Operating, Title Funds, IDEA, Part B
Additional Resources
Technology, Area colleges and universities, Advisory Boards, Chambers of Commerce, Region Service Centers, Employee Benefits Committee, Principals, Central Office Staff, CISD Mentor Teachers, Sam Houston State University, Student Teacher Supervisors, CISD Education Foundation, CISD High Schools, Human Resources Data
Monitoring Timeline
Formative November, January Summative July
Formative Evaluation
Position Control reports, Human Resources reports to CISD Board (at Board meetings and workshops), Agendas and data for Council for Minority Recruitment & Retention, Recruiting reports, University and Regional Service Center partnership meetings, Training and staff development agendas/reports, NTA agendas, TASB Salary Survey, Professional New Hire Surveys, Employee Exit Surveys, Substitute Feedback and Satisfaction Surveys
Summative Evaluation Meet Performance Indicators for TAPR, ESSA, and District
Project Manager(s):
Director of Human Resources, Assistant Director of Human Resource, Coordinator of Human Resources , Recruitment/Retention Specialist, Bilingual/ESL Coordinator, Director of Curriculum, Instruction, & Staff Development, and NTA Facilitators
Goal 4 PARENTS AND COMMUNITY
CISD will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through collaborative partnerships and unity of purpose.
Objective 4.1 Parent and Family Involvement
Strategies Sustain District-level parent advisory councils to enhance communication and collaboration (PTO/PTA Presidents’ Council, District-Level Planning and Decision-Making Committee, Hispanic Achievement Forum, Special Education, Parent Advisory Council, District Parental Involvement Meeting for Title I, District Safety Committee, School Health Advisory Council).
Retain CISD parent and community outreach programs to support the educational achievement of CISD students (ex: CISD Newcomer Center, parent education classes, parent technology classes, parent center at county library, GED classes, Hispanic Parent Nights, Parent Orientation sessions in Spanish, Family Learning Nights).
Support staff training in parent involvement/parenting models in order to build parental involvement.
38
Showcase model programs and services to encourage quality parent and community involvement programs.
Ensure that Campus Improvement Plans address parent and community involvement. Disseminate information, in English and Spanish, about parent involvement, parenting and parent
education, adult education opportunities, and community resources to campuses and to community agencies/organizations.
Maintain Title I Parent Compacts for Title I Schoolwide campuses to support student success and parent involvement.
Facilitate education sessions for parents at various community/campus locations in order to address a variety of topics including study skills, child development, support programs within CISD, curriculum, assessment, etc.
Maintain the Parent Resource Center, with English and Spanish support, for parents of students with disabilities to provide information on CISD procedures, programs, resources, and contacts, and continue to provide the Transition and Resource Fair for students with disabilities.
Maintain the CISD Partners and Volunteers web page to share information on partnerships and volunteer opportunities.
Disseminate college admissions information in Spanish on each high school campus. Maintain parent resources on the District webpage. Host Youth Activity Fairs to encourage participation in community activities. Communicate District news through social media and webpage. Host parent information sessions at our Test Prep Boot Camp events.
Objective 4.2 Community and Business Partnerships
Strategies Retain and expand (as appropriate) CISD partnerships with community agencies, civic organizations, and governmental agencies to support the educational achievement of CISD students.
Develop and expand CISD CTE partnerships with community agencies, businesses, industry organizations, and governmental agencies to increase job shadowing and internship opportunities for CISD students.
Continue the development and distribution of the Student Activity Guide to better inform parents about non-school activities available to their students throughout the District.
Host Youth Activity Fairs to encourage participation in community activities. Continue to host CTE Career Expo to encourage business, community and parental involvement in
career planning for CISD students. Maintain district-wide and campus-based community partnerships and programs that support
educational achievement, career awareness and/or enhance the curriculum. Host a New Teacher Vendor Fair for community businesses and organizations. Provide a link on the website for nonschool-related organizations to post notices regarding special
events, programs, and activities designed for school-aged children.
Financial Resources
General Operating, Title Funds, IDEA, Part B
Additional Resources Technology, Education for Tomorrow Alliance, Junior Achievement, Conroe ISD Web Page
Monitoring Timeline
Formative November, January Summative July
Formative Evaluation
Web posting of communications, current information, student pictures, and events; minutes of district meetings, posted on website; distribution of Student Activity Guide; district brochures and informative literature; record of business and community partners; record of flyers posted on website
Summative Evaluation
Meet Performance Indicators for District
Project Manager
Deputy Superintendent Assistant Superintendents, Principals, Director of Communications , Director of Community Outreach and Drop Out Prevention, Director of Special Education, Coordinator Federal Programs , Coordinator of Guidance and Counseling, Coordinator of PE/Health, College Readiness Specialist
39
Goal 5 SAFE SCHOOLS
CISD will strive to ensure a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective 5.1 Implement Safe Schools Plan
Strategies Maintain the CISD Safe Schools Committee and the Campus/Departmental Emergency Operations Team to review and make recommendations for the Safe Schools Plan.
Ensure that the CISD Safe Schools Plan addresses the areas of mitigation/prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery, as well as safety control, crisis management, facilities management, environmental control, transportation services, and health services.
Conduct a Safe Schools Audit on each campus and District facility every three years making recommendations for improvements.
Update students, parents, faculty, and staff annually on the CISD Student Code of Conduct as required. Implement the inclement weather/disaster/emergency procedures/continuation of operations for CISD
campuses and facilities. Implement a CISD Multi-Hazard Emergency Operations Plan, including command management,
preparedness, resource management, communications and information management, supporting technologies, ongoing management and maintenance, as well as suicide prevention, conflict resolution, and violence prevention.
Implement the Standard Response Protocol. This includes use of the following vocabulary used with first responders: Lockout, Lockdown, Evacuate, and Shelter.
Continue to improve campus safety and security through implementation of 2015 Bond projects and new projects from other revenue sources: burglar and surveillance systems; controlled access entrances; IP phone and intercom systems; fire alarm system replacements; exterior lighting improvements; visitor ID software.
Make recommendations for campus safety for all new campuses and new construction. Develop District standards regarding video cameras, controlled access, and communication systems.
Involve parents and community members to support a safe school environment. Provide training to District staff members to support the development of emergency operations and to
assist building leaders with Emergency Incident Command. Coordinate Emergency Operations Plans with local emergency management agencies. As required by HB 1942, the following CISD Board Policies relate to bullying: FDB; FO; FFH; FFI; FNC;
FNG; and FOF. Procedures addressing bullying are located on the CISD website. In addition, staff development regarding bullying has been provided to all campus teachers and administrators through the August 2016, online Safe Schools Training. District policies and procedures will be reviewed and revised, if appropriate, to ensure compliance with the new legislation.
Objective 5.2 Provide Resources and Training for Safety and Security
Strategies Review and expand educational and support programs that involve student partnerships with campus staff and police officers, including programs on resistance to tobacco, alcohol, and other drugs.
Provide training for teachers in discipline management, bullying, suicide prevention, conflict resolution, dating violence (CISD Policy FFH Local), violence prevention, sexual abuse of children, “Culture of Kindness”, and Crisis Prevention Intervention (CPI).
Provide anger management classes for students assigned to Alternative Education Program (AEP). Implement program on the elementary and intermediate campuses to address misbehavior and
improve life/coping skills, including the utilization of Differentiating the Environment training, the Texas Behavior Support Initiative (TBSI), and Crisis Prevention Intervention (CPI).
Continue the implementation of anti-victimization/bullying programs such as Child Lures, McKay’s Legacy, and Get Real About Violence, Challenge Day.
Provide random locker searches, walk-through metal detector searches, and canine searches to deter possession of weapons and drugs on campus.
Promote the KidChat 24-hour phone line to receive and react to information relating to drugs, weapons, fighting, bullying, and other crimes or fear of possible crimes occurring on our campuses.
40
Provide police officers to assist school officials in identifying, documenting, and investigating gang-related incidents and assist local agencies in conducting gang-related investigations involving District students, staff, and property. (NCLB 4.1)
Provide Crisis Response Team training and support on campuses to teachers, counselors, and administration regarding potential crisis situations with students and staff.
Conduct safety, hazardous materials, blood-borne pathogen, bullying, cyberbullying, online predators, sexual harassment, suicide, and integrated pest management training to all staff members.
Provide staff training on the Standard Response Protocol. Conduct fire, disaster, lock-downs, evacuation, and emergency drills to ensure the effectiveness of
Emergency Operations Plans at the District and campus level. Provide student/staff awareness programs in sexual abuse and dangers of drugs, alcohol, and tobacco. Continue to train staff in CPR and AED procedures. Offer internet safety training and sexual abuse awareness training for parents at campus level. Ensure that American Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance is achieved as part of the scheduled
maintenance and renovation process in all CISD schools and educational programs.
Financial Resources
General Operating, Capital Projects Fund, Grants
Additional Resources
Safe Schools Online, Dashboard, School Messenger, NOVA (National Organization of Victim Assistance), MSDS Online, Local Law Enforcement, Fire Departments, Offices of Emergency Management, Samuel McKay Everett Foundation, Montgomery County Crimestoppers, Texas School Safety Center, Texas Attorney General’s Office
Monitoring Timeline
Formative November, January Summative July
Formative Evaluation
CISD Emergency Operations Plan: procedures for weather, disaster, emergency; CISD Crisis Management Plan; Committee agendas and sign-in sheets; Results of Safe Schools Audits; Record of programs/presentations/trainings for students and staff; Quarterly reports of police activity and safety drills
Summative Evaluation
Meet Performance Indicators for District
Project Manager(s):
Deputy Superintendent for Operations, Assistant Superintendent for Secondary Schools, Assistant Superintendent for Elementary Schools, District Safety Coordinator, Chief of CISD Police, Safe Schools Committee, Guidance and Counseling Coordinator
Goal 6 TECHNOLOGY
CISD will provide technology infrastructure, tools, and solutions to meet the administrative requirements of the District and to maximize learning for all students.
Objective 6.1 Maximize Teaching and Learning
Technology Literacy Assessment Overall: 80% of eighth grade students will score at proficient or higher levels of performance on the Technology Literacy Assessment.
Strategies Increase student opportunities for utilizing technology across the curriculum areas. Think in meaningful ways to use the technology to represent what they know, and as a tool to promote
learning and to establish expectations. Seamlessly apply technology across all subject and content areas. Assure that technology is integral to all subject area instruction. Within each grade level cluster, all Technology Applications TEKS are met.
a. Create and integrate web-based lessons which include online TEKS-based content, resources, and learning activities;
b. Provide access to online-curriculum as appropriate.
Utilize technology as a tool for information management, problem solving, and communication.
Objective 6.2 Enhance Professional Practices
Strategies Professional Development training will include: a. integration of technology into teaching and learning;
41
b. strategies to promote the regular creation and communication of new technology-supported learner-centered projects;
c. resources to ensure the vertical alignment of Technology Application TEKS; d. resources to provide anytime, anywhere use of online database resources.
Professional development will focus on the technological capabilities of educators to: a. use iPADs instructionally; b. encourage information literacy skills in their students; c. use Google Drive for administrative and instructional tasks; d. use Canvas to assist in anytime learning; e. teach students to use the internet safely.
Professional development will focus on the leadership capabilities of administrators to: a. recognize and identify exemplary use of technology in instruction; b. demonstrate and model use of technology in daily work; c. ensure the integration of appropriate technologies to maximize learning and teaching; d. involve and educate the school community around issues of technology integration.
Professional development opportunities will focus on online learning: a. teachers are provided professional development in the creation of online courses in Canvas; b. teachers are provided professional development in the use of Gradpoint.
Objective 6.3 Support Administration and Operations
Strategies District and campus leadership promote a shared vision with policies that encourage continuous innovation with technology leading to increased student achievement.
The District and campus administrators will provide vision and planning: a. teachers and administrators have a vision for technology use for direct instruction and student use; b. administrators use technology tools for planning; c. the campus plan addresses Technology Application TEKS and higher-order teaching and learning; d. the campus technology plan is focused on student success; is based on needs, research, proven
teaching and learning principles; and administrators use technology tools for planning and decision-making;
e. the campus technology plan is utilized to guide equipment expenditures and professional development focus; and
f. District Technology Steering committee meets regularly to review and recommend technology direction.
The District will allocate adequate funds to support district technology needs. Provide educators with access to student data for decision-making.
Objective 6.4 Infrastructure to Support All Functions
Strategies Student Technology: a. 2.5 or fewer students per Internet-connected device; b. provide for online student storage; c. provide desktop computers, iPad tablets, and Chromebooks;
d. provide the infrastructure to support students bringing their own technology. Internet Access:
a. direct connectivity to the Internet in 100% of the classrooms; b. adequate bandwidth within and between campuses; c. adequate bandwidth to the internet; d. minimum 1Gb connectivity to all classrooms within the campus.
The technology works consistently, which requires a sufficient staff to support the installed computer equipment base along with strategies and procedures to efficiently manage computer equipment.
Financial Resources
General Operating, Elementary & Secondary, Bond, E-Rate, Title Funds
Additional Resources
Principals , Campus plans, ViewIt, Eduphoria, District Staff Development Plan
42
Monitoring Timeline
Formative November, January Summative July
Formative Evaluation
Records of professional development in technology; Campus and District Technology Plans align with strategies District technology budget supports Technology Plans ; Record of staff development
Summative Evaluation
District Developed Technology Measure
Project Manager(s):
Directors of Technology, Instructional Technology Coordinator, Technology Staff, Director of Curriculum and Instruction, Curriculum Coordinators, Principals
Goal 7 COMMUNICATION
CISD will promote and enhance two-way communication among our staff and our community to maximize the success of all students.
Objective 7.1 Effective Internal Communication
Strategies Maintain the District’s procedures and practices for communicating with employees, Board of Trustees, and patrons/media regarding daily campus/District activities/events, special campus/District activities/events, urgent non-life threatening situations, disaster/life-threatening situations, weather/natural disasters, and other special circumstances.
Provide communications regarding District initiatives, programs, meetings, activities, operations, and leadership within and among all departments and schools through a variety of media, including CISD website, newsletters, email announcements, campus/District meetings, newspaper, radio, television, and other sources.
Elicit comments and suggestions through committees, meetings, and surveys from within the CISD organization regarding improving communications through web page comments, CISD Newcomers Centers, email, District councils and committees, and campus personnel.
Continue vertical meetings to discuss curriculum alignment, program alignment, and departmental issues (cadres; staff development; principals’ meetings; etc.).
Continue horizontal meetings (grade level meetings by campus/feeder/or District; etc.) to discuss curriculum alignment, program alignment, and departmental issues.
Objective 7.2 Effective External Communication
Strategies Utilize the CISD website to promote campus and District events and information for parents, families, communities, and businesses.
Continue producing and distributing press releases to area news media to inform the community of events, educational programs, and information, and to elicit community input.
Provide factual, relevant information about District programs and initiatives to both the public and the District employees through a variety of media (print, website, newsletters, social media, campus meetings, social networks, etc.).
Provide information regarding demographic, financial, achievement, and student and staff data through published reports for parents, families, communities, and businesses.
Elicit comments, suggestions, and questions from parents/families/communities/businesses through CISD website, e-mail, Kid Chat, and the CISD Newcomers Centers.
Plan, coordinate, and advertise District-wide events.
Financial Resources General Operating
Additional Resources
Campus Communicators, Campus Webmasters, Communications Specialist, Translation services, Local media, Safe Schools Plan, Technology
Monitoring Timeline
Formative November, January Summative July
Formative Evaluation
Record of contact with media, Record of press releases, Record of campus communication, Website information is current and accurate
Summative Evaluation
Meet Performance Indicators for District
Project Manager(s): Director of Communications, Curriculum and Instruction Director, Coordinator of Graphics and Printing, Directors of Technology
43
Resources Allocated for State Compensatory Education Program
2016-2017 School Year
Strategy SCE Program/Service Funds Budgeted FTEs
Goal 1 Closing Performance Gaps Index 3 Strategy 14, 20
General Education Teachers for At-Risk Students Campuses District SCE Indirect Cost $30,525,441 533.98
Goal 1 Closing Performance Gaps Index 3 Strategy 14, 18, 19, 20
Secondary Campus Teachers and Paraprofessionals Serving At-Risk Students $4,929,083 92.27
Goal 1 Closing Performance Gaps Index 3 Strategy 12, 22 Dropout Prevention Index 4 Strategy 9 Academic Tutorials for At-Risk Students $498,285 9.06
Goal 1 Closing Performance Gaps Index 3 Strategy 11 Parent Education Specialist $60,786 1.00
Goal 1 Closing Performance Gaps Index 3 Strategy 24 Goal 1 Dropout Prevention Index 4 Strategy 4,10 PASS Overage Initiative $250,981 4.50
Goal 1 Closing Performance Gaps Index 3 Strategy 20 District At-Risk Instructional Coaches $278,707 5.00
Goal 1 Closing Performance Gaps Index 3 Strategy 20
Elementary/Intermediate Campus At-Risk Instructional Coaches and Intervention Teachers $1,021,312 19.00
Goal 1 Closing Performance Gaps Index 3 Strategy 12
Instructional Materials for At-Risk Students $193,994 0.00
Goal 1 Closing Performance Gaps Index 3 Strategy 13 Transportation for At-Risk Students $7,404 0.00
Total SCE $37,765,993 664.81
44
Resources Allocated for Title I - III
2016-2017 School Year
Strategy Program/Service
Funds
Budgeted FTEs
Title IA
Goal 1 Close the Performance Gap Index 3 Strategy 12, 20 ELA: Strategy 1, 2 Writing Strategy 1, 2 Social Studies Strategy 4, 5 Science Strategy 1 Instructional Coaches and Support $804,841 11.15 Goal 1 Closing Performance Gaps Index 3 Strategy 12, 13, 21, 24
Program Administration Supplies, Administrator (85%) and Secretary (75%) $144,151 1.60
Goal 1 Successful Completion of High School Index 4
Strategy 8
Homeless Support Paraprofessional $12,879 0.50
Goal 1 Closing Performance Gaps Index 3 Strategy 24
Goal 1 Dropout Prevention Index 4 Strategy 3 PASS Overage Initiative Support $302,440 4.00 Goal 3 Recruitment, Development, and Retention of Staff Strategy 1
HR Title I Certifications Paraprofessional (33%) and Legal Fees $56,641 0.33
Goal 1 Closing Performance Gaps Index 3 Strategy 12 ELA Strategy 1 Writing Strategy 2 Private School Title I ELA Teacher for At-Risk PT $16,488 0.29 Goal 1 Closing Performance Gaps Index 3 Strategy 21
Summer School Materials, Extra Duty and Transportation $506,380 7.27
Goal 4 Parent and Family Involvement Strategy 1 Parent Involvement Materials and Extra Duty $70,144 0.01
TOTAL Title IA $1,913,964 25.15
Title IC
Goal 1 Close Performance Gaps Index 3 Strategy 25
Migrant Program Paraprofessional, Extra Duty, Mileage, and Materials $37,710 1.10
TOTAL Title IC $37,710 1.10
Title ID
Goal 1 Dropout Prevention Index 4
Strategy 1, 2, 7 Juvenile Delinquent Instructional Materials and Extra Duty $125,131 .30
TOTAL Title ID $125,131 .30
45
Strategy Program/Service
Funds
Budgeted FTEs
Title IIA Goal 1 Instruction and Staff Development Index 2 ELA: Strategy 1 Writing Strategy 1, 2, 3 Math Strategy 1, 2, 4, 6 Social Studies Strategy 4, 5 Science Strategy 1, 2
Instructional Coaches and Support $312,654 4.85
Goal 1 Successful Completion of High School Index 4 Strategy 3
Goal 2 Fiscal Responsibility Strategy 1
Program Administration Administrator (15%) and Secretaries (25%) $62,499 1.15
Goal 1 Instruction and Staff Development Index 2 ELA: Strategy 1 Writing Strategy 1, 2, 3 Math Strategy 1, 2, 4, 6 Social Studies Strategy 4, 5 Science Strategy 1, 2 Private Schools Staff Development $15,000 0.00 Goal 1 Instruction and Staff Development Index 2 ELA: Strategy 1 Writing Strategy 1, 2, 3 Math Strategy 1, 2, 4, 6 Social Studies Strategy 4, 5 Science Strategy 1, 2
Goal 3 Recruitment, Development and Retention of Staff Strategy 1
Staff Development Materials, Extra Duty, and Contracted Services $611,271 4.79
TOTAL Title IIA $1,001,424 10.79
46
Strategy Program/Service
Funds
Budgeted FTEs
Title III LEP
Goal 1 Instruction and Staff Development Index 2 Reading/ELA Strategy 1, 3, 5, 6, 8 Writing Strategy 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 Math Strategy 1, 2, 4, 6, 8 Social Studies Strategy 2, 4, 5, 12, 13 Index 3 Staff Development Strategy 12, 16, 17, 18, 19 Instructional Coaches (50%) and Support $116,615 1.50. Goal 1 Instruction and Staff Development Index 2 Reading/ELA Strategy 1, 6, 7, 8, 9 Writing Strategy 1 Math Strategy 4, 6 Social Studies Strategy 1, 4 Science Strategy 1 Goal 1 Close Performance Gaps Index 3 Strategy 12 Instructional Materials and Extra Duty $26,500 0.19
Goal 1 Successful Completion of High School Index 4
Strategy 1, 20 Newcomer Social Worker $34,518 0.50 Goal 1 Instruction and Staff Development ELA: Strategy 1, 5-8 Elementary Goal 1 Close Performance Gaps Index 3 Writing Strategy 1, 3 Math Strategy 3, 21, 49, 51 Social Studies Strategy 4, 5 Science Strategy 1
Staff Development Materials and Contracted Services $91,413 0.83
Goal 1 Closing Performance Gaps Index 3 Strategy 21 Summer School $256,000 3.90
Goal 1 Dropout Prevention Index 4 Strategy 1 Program Administration Secretary $14,753 0.25
TOTAL Title III LEP $539,799 7.17
47
Strategy Program/Service
Funds
Budgeted FTEs
Title III IMM
Goal 1 Instruction and Staff Development ELA: Strategy 1, 5-8 Elementary Goal 1 Close the Performance Gap Index 2 Writing Strategy 1,3 Math Strategy 1, 12 Social Studies Strategy 13, 14 Science Strategy Index 3 Strategy 1
Instructional Coaches (50%) and Support $116,615 1.50
Goal 1 Closing Performance Gaps Index 3 Strategy 1, 13, 15 Instructional Materials $22,312 0.00
Goal 1 Successful Completion of High School Index 4 Strategy 1, 20
New Comer Social Worker and Paraprofessional $56,479 1.50
Goal 1 Closing Performance Gaps Index 3 Strategy 1, 13, 15 Summer School $7,937 0.14
Goal 1 Dropout Prevention Index 4 Strategy 1
Program Administration Secretary $10,623 0.25
TOTAL Title III IMM $213,966 3.39
48
Conroe Independent School District
Financial Structure and Basis of Accounting
Description of Entity The Conroe Independent School District is an independent public educational agency operating under applicable laws and regulations of the State of Texas. A seven member Board of Trustees elected to staggered three-year terms by the District’s residents autonomously governs the District. The Texas Education Agency and Southern Association of Colleges and Schools provide the District’s K-12 education accreditation. The District includes 57 campuses. There are 29 elementary schools, 3 Kindergarten-6th grade schools, 9 intermediates, 7 junior highs, 5 high schools and 1 alternative high school. Three of the 5 High Schools have separate 9th grade campuses. The District occupies 348 square miles within Montgomery County, Texas and the 2016-2017 enrollment is estimated at over 59,000 students. Please refer to page 349 , in the Informational section, for a map of the District.
Fund Accounting The Funds and accounts of the District have been established under the rules prescribed in the Financial Accounting and Reporting Module of the Texas Education Agency Financial Accountability System Resource Guide. This budget document contains detailed information for all funds for which the Board of Trustees is required to adopt annual budgets. Budgets for all funds are prepared using the same method of accounting as for financial reports (modified accrual). Under the modified accrual basis of accounting, revenues are recognized in the accounting period in which they become both measurable and available. Expenditures are recognized in the accounting period in which the fund liability is incurred, if measurable, except for principal and interest on general long-term debt which is recognized when due. Following is a description of the funds for which annual budgets are adopted.
General Fund The General Fund is used to account for all financial transactions not properly includable in other funds. The principal sources of revenue include local property taxes, state funding allocations and interest on fund investments. The District does receive other revenues; however they are not considered material or sustaining. Expenditures include all costs necessary for the daily operation of the schools.
Special Revenue Funds Special Revenue Funds are used to account for funds awarded to the District for the purpose of accomplishing specific educational tasks as defined by grantors in contracts or other agreements.
Food Service – used to account for the District’s Food Services Program including local, state and federal revenue sources and all costs associated with the operation of the program.
Debt Service Fund The Debt Service Fund is used to account for the payment of interest and principal on all bonds of the District. The primary source of revenue for the debt service fund is local property taxes.
Capital Projects Fund The Capital Projects Fund is used to account, on a project basis, for projects financed by the proceeds from bond issues, or for capital projects otherwise mandated to be accounted for in this fund. The capital projects fund utilizes the modified accrual basis of accounting.
49
Conroe Independent School District
Classification of Revenues and Expenditures
Section 44.007 of the Texas Education Code requires that a standard school district fiscal accounting system be adopted by each school district. The system must meet at least the minimum requirements prescribed by the State Board of Education and also be subject to review and comment by the state auditor. Additionally, the accounting system must conform with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). This section further requires that a report be provided at the time that the school district budget is filed showing financial information sufficient to enable the state board of education to monitor the funding process and to determine educational system costs by school district, campus and program. A major purpose of the accounting code structure is to establish the standard school district fiscal accounting system required by law. Although certain codes within the overview may be used at local option, the sequence of the codes within the structure and the funds and chart of accounts are to be uniformly used by all school districts in accordance with GAAP. Basic System Expenditure Code Composition
• Fund Code – A mandatory three digit code used for all financial transactions to identify the fund group and specific funds. The first digit refers to the fund group and the second and third digits specify the fund.
• Function Code – A mandatory two digit code which identifies the purpose of the transaction is applied to expenditures. The first digit identifies the major service area and the second digit refers to the specific function within the area.
• Object Code – A mandatory four digit code identifying the nature and object of an account, a transaction or a source. The first of the four digits identifies the type of account or transaction, the second digit identifies the major area and the third and fourth digits provide further sub-classifications.
• Sub-Object – Optional code. At Conroe ISD this code is used to provide special accountability for certain programs or areas.
• Organization Code – A mandatory three digit code identifying the organization, i.e., campus, department.
• Fiscal Year Code – A mandatory single digit code which identifies the fiscal year of the transaction or the project year of inception of a grant project.
• Program Intent Code – A two digit code used to designate services provided to students.
• Optional Code 3, 4 and 5 – Optional code that may be used to further describe the transaction.
District revenues are classified by fund and object or source. There are three major sources: local sources, state sources and federal sources. Expenditure budgets are legally adopted at the fund and function level; however, within this document we have included several additional presentations of expenditures. These presentations segregate expenditures by either organization or by major object. Major object codes are used to describe the type of items purchased or services obtained. The major object codes used in this document are: payroll and related costs, purchased and contracted services, supplies and materials, other operating expenditures and capital outlay. Fund codes have been previously described in the preceding Financial Structure section. Following is a description of the function codes used throughout this document.
50
Function Codes
General Descriptions
Function codes are grouped according to related activities in the following major areas:
10 Instruction and Instructional Related Services- This function series is used for expenditures/expenses that provide direct interaction between staff and student to achieve learning. It includes expenses for the resources to achieve the appropriate student learning outcomes.
11 Instruction- This function is used for activities that deal directly with the interaction between teachers and students. This function includes expenditures for direct classroom instruction and other activities that deliver, enhance, or direct the delivery of learning situations to students.
12 Instructional Resources and Media Services- This function is used for expenditures that are directly and exclusively used for resource center, establishing and maintaining libraries, and other major facilities dealing with educational resources and media.
13 Curriculum Development and Instructional Staff Development- This function is used for expenditures that are directly and exclusively used to aid instructional staff in planning, developing, and evaluating the process of providing learning experiences for students.
20 Instructional and School Leadership- This function series is used for expenditures/expenses that relate to the managing, directing, supervising and leadership of staff who are providing either instructional or instructional-related services.
21 Instructional Leadership- This function encompasses those district-wide activities that have as their purpose managing, directing, and supervising the general and specific instructional programs and activities. For example, function 21 includes instructional supervisors and Assistant Superintendent for Instruction but does not include principals.
23 School Leadership- This function includes expenses for directing, managing and supervising a school. It includes salaries and supplies for the principal, assistant principal and other administrative and clerical staff including attendance clerks.
30 Student Support Services- This function series is used for expenditures/expenses that directly support students.
31 Guidance, Counseling and Evaluation Service- This function includes expenses for testing and assessing students’ abilities, aptitudes, and interests with respect to career and educational goals and opportunities. It includes psychological services, testing, and counseling.
32 Social Work Services- This function includes expenditures that directly and exclusively promote and improve school attendance. Examples include visiting teachers, home visitor aides, and truant officers.
33 Health Services- This function embraces the area of providing health services that are not a part of direct instruction. It includes medical, dental, and nursing services.
51
Function Codes
General Descriptions 34 Student Transportation- This function includes the cost of providing management and
operational services for transporting students to and from school. Function 34 includes transportation supervisors and bus drivers but does not include field trips.
35 Food Services- This function includes the management of the food service program at
the schools and the serving of meals, lunches, or snacks in connection with school activities. Function 35 includes cooks and food purchases but does not include concession stands.
36 Cocurricular/Extracurricular Activities- This function incorporates those activities that are
student and curricular related but are not necessary to the regular instructional services. Function 36 includes athletic salary supplements paid exclusively for coaching, directing, or sponsoring extracurricular athletics but does not include salaries for teaching physical education .
40 Administrative Support Services- This function series is used to account for
expenditures/expenses that relate to the overall general administrative support services of the district.
41 General Administration- This function includes expenses incurred for the overall
administrative responsibilities of the school district. It includes expenses for the school board, superintendent’s office, personnel services, financial services, and administrative attendance personnel.
50 Support Services- This function series is used for expenditures/expenses that are used
for school district support services.
51 Facilities Maintenance and Operations- This function includes expenses incurred to keep the facilities and grounds open, clean, comfortable and in good working condition and state of repair, and insured. This function also includes expenses associated with warehousing and receiving services.
52 Security and Monitoring Services- This function is used for expenditures to keep student
and staff surroundings safe whether in transit to or from school, on a campus or participating in school-sponsored events at another location.
53 Data Processing Services- This function is used for expenditures for data processing
services, whether in-house or contracted. 60 Ancillary Services- This function series is used for expenditures/expenses that are for
school district support services supplemental to the operation of the school district.
61 Community Services- This function encompasses all other activities of the school district that are designed to provide a service or benefit to the community as a whole or a portion of the community.
52
Function Codes
General Descriptions
70 Debt Service- This function series is used for expenditures/expenses that are used for the payment of debt principal and interest.
71 Debt Service- This function is used for expenditures that are for the retirement of recurring bond, capital lease principal, and other debt, related debt service fees, and for all debt interest.
80 Capital Outlay - This function series is used for expenditures/expenses that are for acquisitions, construction, or major renovation of school district facilities.
81 Facilities Acquisition and Construction- This function includes expenses for acquisition of land and building, the remodeling of buildings, additions to buildings, and installation and extension of service systems and other built-in systems.
90 Intergovernmental Charges- This function series is used for the transfer of resources from one governmental unit to another.
99 Other Intergovernmental Charges- This function is used for expenditures to other governmental entities, such as county appraisal districts, for costs related to the appraisal of property.
53
Conroe Independent School District
Significant Financial Policies and Procedures The following financial policies and procedures of the District significantly influence the development of the annual budget. Cash Management The District’s cash management goals are as follows:
• Insure proper collateralization of deposits.
• Ensure adequate balances to cover cash disbursement needs.
• Maximize interest earnings.
• Minimize bank changes. These goals are accomplished by keeping bank balances as low as possible through transferring all available dollars into an investment pool. Additionally, treasuries, government discount notes, and commercial paper are purchased after considering yield and cash flow projections. Cash balances are monitored daily by the District through on-line banking. Using this system allows accounting personnel to minimize bank balances by only transferring into the accounts the funds necessary to cover the dollar amount of checks that have been presented to the bank each day. This keeps the low interest bearing bank balances at a minimum, thus maximizing interest earnings. Investment Policies The Board of Trustees has adopted a written investment policy regarding the investment of its funds as defined in the Public Funds Investment Act of 1995. This policy authorizes the District to invest in obligations of the U. S. Treasury, the State of Texas or certain U. S. agencies, certificates of deposit, repurchase agreements, commercial paper, money market and no-load mutual funds and public funds investment pools as permitted by Chapter 2256, Texas Government Code. The main goal of the investment program is to ensure its safety as well as to maximize financial returns within current market conditions in accordance with the District’s investment policy. Assets of the District shall be invested in instruments whose maturities do not exceed three years from the time of purchase. The Board may specifically authorize a longer maturity for a given investment, within legal limits. The investment portfolio shall be diversified in terms of investment instrument, maturity scheduling, and financial institutions to reduce the risk of loss. Monitoring is performed monthly as investment reports are submitted to the Board of Trustees for review. In addition, the District investment officer annually presents a comprehensive report on the investment program and investment activity. Debt Administration Debt service is a major area of cost due to the District’s building program that is primarily financed by the sale of general obligation bonds. The ratio of net bonded debt to assessed value for the District is 3.87%. Educational legislation has eliminated limits on outstanding debt; however, prior law limited debt to 10% of the assessed value and the District is well below that level. All principal and interest payments are due February 15th and August 15th of each year. On February 1st of each year, outstanding taxes become delinquent which permits the collection of a large majority of taxes levied before the long-term debt payments are due. The District’s bonds presently carry a favorable rating of “Aaa” with Moody’s Investment Service and “AAA” with Standard and Poor’s Investor Service.
54
Significant Financial Policies and Procedures (continued)
Debt Service Policy The Board of Directors may obtain funds to construct, acquire or equip school buildings, to purchase necessary sites, to purchase school buses, or to acquire, or refinance property financed under a contract entered under the Public Property Finance Act by issuing bonds and assessing annual ad valorem taxes sufficient to pay the principal and interest on the bonds as they come due. Before issuing bonds, the District must demonstrate to the Attorney General that, with respect to the proposed issuance, the District has a projected ability to pay the principal of and interest on the proposed bonds and all previously issued bond. The District has adopted the provisions of section 45 of the Texas Education Code requiring the levy each year of a tax rate, unlimited as to amount, sufficient to meet principal and interest requirements during the fiscal year. Resources from the property taxes for servicing bonded debt principal and interest are accumulated in, and expended from the Debt Service Fund (Article 278e-1, VCS). Texas statutes do not prescribe a debt limit; however, a practical economic debt limit of 10% of the assessed valuation is used by the district. Fund Balances and Net Position The District has adopted the provisions of GASB Statement No. 54, Fund Balance Reporting and Governmental Fund Type Definitions (GASB 54). In accordance with GASB 54 the District classifies governmental fund balances as follows: Non-Spendable – includes amounts that cannot be spent because they are either not in spendable form, or, for legal or contractual reasons, must be kept intact. This classification includes inventories, prepaid items and long term receivables. Restricted – includes fund balance amounts that are constrained for specific purposes which are externally imposed by providers, such as creditors or amounts restricted due to constitutional provisions or enabling legislation. This classification includes the child nutrition program, retirement of long term debt, construction programs and other federal and state grants. Committed – Committed fund balances are amounts constrained to specific purposes by the District itself, using a resolution passed by its highest decision making authority (the Board of Trustees). To be reported as committed, amounts cannot be used for any other purpose unless the District takes the same highest level of action to remove or change the constraint.
Assigned – includes fund balance amounts that are self imposed by the District to be used for a particular purpose. Fund balance can be assigned by the District’s Board, the Superintendent or the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to the District’s fund balance policy.
Unassigned – amounts that are available for any purpose are considered unassigned fund balance. Positive numbers can only be reported in the general fund. Net Position may serve over time as a useful indication of a government’s financial position. Net position on the Statement of Net Position includes the following: Net Investment in Capital Assets – this component of net position reports the difference between capital assets less both the accumulated depreciation and the outstanding balance of debt, excluding unspent proceeds, that is directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or improvement of these capital assets; Restricted –this component of net position reports the difference between assets and liabilities of the District that consist of assets with constraints placed on their use by external parties; Unrestricted –the difference between the assets and liabilities that is not reported in Net Investment in Capital Assets, or Restricted Net Position.
55
Significant Financial Policies and Procedures (continued) Reserve Policies
• General Fund & Debt Service Fund– The District strives to maintain a fund balance equal to 16-24% of operating expenditures for the general and debt service funds.
• Debt Service Fund – The District maintains a debt service fund balance of not more than 1/2 of the previous year’s required principal and interest payments for all outstanding bonds. If the fund balance exceeds this level, the excess is considered a reserve and is subject to rebate under arbitrage regulations.
• Food Service Fund – The fund balance for food service should not exceed three months of average food service operations expenditures. Average monthly food service expenditures are calculated by dividing the subsequent year’s budgeted expenditures by ten months since the food service department only operates for ten months out of the year.
Accounting Pronouncements The District has adopted the provisions of GASB Statement No. 68, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions (GASB 68). I detailed calculation will be performed in conjunction with the preparation of the District’s annual financial statements. Risk Management The District’s risk management program encompasses various means of protecting the District against loss. Property and casualty, health, and workers’ compensation insurance is provided by commercial carriers and liability insurance coverage is provided by the Texas Association of School Boards. The District also has local Safety Programs, a District Police Department and a written Investment Policy which ensures the safety of funds as well as maximizing the financial returns. Independent Audit and Financial Reporting In accordance with Section 221.256, Texas Education Code, public school districts in Texas shall have their accounts audited annually. The audit shall be made on an organization-wide basis and shall involve all funds types and accounts groups of the school district. In addition to meeting the requirements set forth in state statutes, the audit is also designed to meet the requirements of the federal Single Audit Act of 1984 and the related provisions of OMB Circular A-133 “Audits of State, Local Governments and Non-Profit Organizations.” Once the annual audit is complete, an Annual Financial and Compliance Report is prepared and submitted to the Texas Education Agency for review. The Annual Financial and Compliance Report is designed to meet the specific monitoring needs of the Texas Education Agency. Thus, a Comprehensive Annual Financial Report conforming to standards of both the Association of School Business Officials International and the Government Finance Officers Association is also prepared to better serve the needs of the taxpayers and other financial statement users.
56
Conroe Independent School District
Budget Policies and Development Procedures
The State, the Texas Education Agency (TEA) and each local district formulate legal requirements for school district budgets. Legal Requirements Sections 44.002 through 44.006 of the Texas Education Code establish the legal basis for budget development in school districts. The following items summarize the legal requirements from the code:
• The Superintendent is the budget officer for the District and prepares or causes the budget to be prepared.
• The District budget must be prepared by a date set by the State Board of Education, currently August 20th.
• The President of the Board of Trustees must call a public meeting of the Board of Trustees giving ten days public notice in a newspaper for the adoption of the District budget. Any taxpayer in the District may be present and participate in the meeting.
• No funds may be expended in any manner other than as provided for in the adopted budget. The Board does have the authority to amend the budget or adopt a supplementary emergency budget to cover unforeseen expenditures.
• The budget must be prepared in accordance with GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) and State guidelines.
• The budget must be legally adopted before the adoption of the tax rate. Annual budgets must be prepared for the following funds: General Fund, Debt Service Fund, Technology Fund, Food Service and Special Revenue Funds. Budget Development Process Teachers, principals, community members and other staff of the District, under the direction of the Chief Financial Officer and the Superintendent, develop the budget. All expenditure allocations are determined based on projected revenue from state and local sources with the goals of maintaining an appropriate fund balance and combined tax rate while still meeting District educational goals. The budget process begins in December each year with the preparation of the budget calendar and enrollment projections. The enrollment projections contained in this plan form the basis for significant budgetary decisions including per pupil allocations to each campus, instructional staffing allocations and other required service levels. The Chief Financial Officer prepares revenue projections for all funds. These projections are based on enrollment projections, estimates of local tax revenue, State funding formulas, and other significant factors. The State funding formulas are extremely complex. The Texas Legislature meets every other year. Salaries and benefits comprise approximately 89.06% of the annual operating budget. Therefore, the Board of Trustees gives careful consideration to staffing allocations for both instructional and non-instructional positions. Additional personnel units are evaluated each year and, after extensive review and analysis, recommendations are presented to the Board of Trustees. Personnel units are allocated to each campus based on projected student enrollment following State mandated ratios as applicable. The budget amounts are then developed utilizing approved staffing guidelines and estimates of cost for each position. Projected costs for each position are based on the average cost of employees currently filling each position. Supplemental pay (coaches, department heads, etc.) is approved on a year-to-year basis and does not become part of the base salary of an employee. A salary supplement may be changed upward, downward or eliminated as the Board of Trustees deems is in the best interest of the District.
57
Budget Policies and Development Procedures (continued)
In order to decentralize the budget process for non-payroll related budget allocations, site-based decision making teams, working under the direction of each campus principal, contribute extensively to campus budget decisions. Each campus receives a basic allotment per student to be used for supplies, materials, equipment, staff development and other appropriate instructional costs. The site-based decision making teams make decisions concerning utilization of this allocation. Budgets for non-campus units are developed by department heads and reviewed by the Superintendent and the Chief Financial Officer. The Chief Financial Officer develops the Debt Service Fund budget. This budget is constructed based primarily on tax base assumptions (for local revenue projections), State funding estimates, and required and projected debt retirement requirements. The Food Service Fund budget is prepared by the Director of Child Nutrition. The Superintendent and Chief Financial Officer then review the budget for approval. Following this development process, consolidated budgetary information is presented to the Board of Trustees in workshops and regular meetings. This information is summarized in a variety of different presentations and line item detail is provided, as requested, through written and verbal supporting information. Significant dates and events included in the budget development process are summarized on the budget calendars on the following pages of this document. Capital Improvement Budget Policies Capital Projects Funds are used to account for the proceeds of general obligation bonds and related interest earnings and the expenditures of these funds for the construction and equipping of new school facilities, to purchase school sites, and renovations or repair of existing facilities. The Board of Trustees does not formally adopt the Capital Projects Funds budgets annually. These budgets are prepared on a project basis based on the proceeds available from bond issues and planned expenditures outlined in applicable bond ordinances. Capital Projects Fund equity is re-appropriated in each year’s budget through budget amendments until all available funds for acquisition and construction of facilities are utilized. Each major construction contract is approved based on the existing availability of bond proceeds and/or approved but not issued bonds. However, the impact of the Capital Projects Funds budgets must be considered during development of the annual budgets for all other funds. Future operating costs (staffing, utilities, etc.) associated with capital improvements and new facilities must be projected and included in the General Fund budget. Repayment of bonds issued for capital projects must be included in Debt Service Fund projections Additionally, certain capital outlay expenditures are budgeted in the General Fund. Other capital needs (buses, computers, etc.) are provided for in both the General Fund and the Technology Fund based on department head requests during the budget hearings. Before any Capital Improvement Projects are considered, a detailed demographic/enrollment study, and a review of existing facilities for optimization must be conducted by a competent demographer. These studies will determine if a new building is necessary to relieve existing buildings in demographic areas of the District. Whenever these assessments are being conducted, a District wide long-range facility master plan with associated cost and time frame must be considered and coordinated with District Financial Advisors.
58
December 2, 2015 Preliminary budget meeting of the Finance Office to discuss
budget development process
February 2, 2016 First meeting with the Board to discuss budget projections
and goals
January - February Projected enrollment figures developed and ready for use in
budget preparation
February, 2016 Preliminary budget meeting with Finance Office and Deputy
Superintendent and Assistant Superintendents for
Secondary & Elementary Education to discuss budget
meetings with department heads and principals and overall
budget process
April 20, 2016 ELEMENTARY/INTERMEDIATE PRINCIPALS MTG
Distribute budget packets to elementary and intermediate
campus principals. Discuss per pupil allocations, specific
budget needs, and mechanics of budgeting.
April 20, 2016 SECONDARY PRINCIPALS MEETING
Distribute budget packets to secondary campus principals.
Discuss per pupil allocations, specific budget needs, and
mechanics of budgeting.
April 20, 2016 CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Distribution of budget packets to Curriculum group
April-May Staffing allocation meetings with principals
59
April-May Finance Office to meet with individual support department
heads to distribute budget packets, and discuss budget
development process
May 12, 2016 Campus budgets due to Assistant Superintendents for
Secondary and Elementary Education
May 19, 2016 Campus budgets due to Finance Office
All departmental budgets due to the Finance Office
May-June Review campus and department budgets. Develop payroll
budgets.
June 3, 2016 Tax Collection Certification for 2015-2016 to TEA
June 24, 2016 Revenue budgets developed based on estimated tax values.
Expenditure estimates based on submitted requests
including staffing changes and salary adjustments.
May - August Schedule meetings and review budget with the Board of
Trustees.
July 15, 2016 I M P O R T A N T
Official Notification Received for Chapter 41
July 19, 2016 Regular Board Meeting (1st Budget Proposals)
July 20, 2016 Post Notice of public hearing on budget and tax rate.
60
July, 2016 Meeting with District-Level Planning & Decision-Making
Committee to discuss 2016-17 Budget
July 25, 2016 FOR INFORMATION ONLY
District receives certified appraisal roll. Adjust revenue
projections.
August 2, 2016 Public hearing on 2016-17 Budget and Tax Rate. Special
Board Meeting to discuss budget
August 6, 2016 Publish “NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING TO DISCUSS
BUDGET AND TAX RATE”
(must be at least 10 days prior to public meeting).
August 16, 2016 REGULAR BOARD MEETING
1. Public hearing on 2016-17 Budget and Tax Rate.
2. Adopt 2016-17 Budget (Must be before adoption of tax
rate)
3. Set 2016-17 Tax Rate (Must adopt by component, i.e.
M&O and I&S).
August 26, 2016 Last date to complete and return the 2016-17 Chapter 41
choice selection form.
61
Conroe Independent School District
Budget Administration and Management Process
Adoption of the official budget by the Board of Trustees is only the first step in the budgetprocess. Following adoption, the budget administration and management process begins. Thebudget administration and management process is the process of regulating expendituresthroughout the fiscal year to ensure that they do not exceed authorized amounts and that they areused for intended, proper, and legal purposes.
Expenditure Control and Approvals
Expenditure appropriations are allocated between approximately 80 organizations or cost centers(campuses, departments, divisions, etc.). Each organization is assigned a budget manager (i.e.,principal, department head). The budget manager is accountable for his organization’s portion ofthe General Fund budget. Each budget manager is authorized to approve the expenditure offunds within their respective organization provided that the funds are expended in accordancewith District purchasing procedures and legal requirements.
This is accomplished through the use of the Standard Account Code System prescribed by theTexas Education Agency, which includes an organization code. This code system is described indetail within this document. Each budget manager (or designee) is granted on-line access to theaccounting codes for their organization. This access includes purchase order, check requisition,account inquiry and reporting capabilities.
Purchase Orders The Board of Trustees approves all bid awards and contracts. Purchase orders are prepared forall tangible goods. Once a purchase order is entered and approved at the campus/departmentallevel, administrative regulations require that all purchase orders be forwarded to the PurchasingDepartment for verification of availability of funds, proper account coding, and compliance withlegal purchasing procedures. Purchasing then sends the P.O. to the appropriate vendor. Oncethe P.O. is printed and mailed, an encumbrance is entered into the account code. Encumbrancesare reservations of appropriations for open purchase orders for goods that have not yet beenreceived. The purpose of the encumbrance is to insure that obligations are recognized as soonas financial commitments are made in order to prevent inadvertent over-expenditure of funds dueto lack of information about future commitments.
The majority of goods are received at our Central Warehouse. The warehouse personnelprepare a receiving report either on-line or manually. Once the Accounts Payable Departmentmatches the P.O., receiving report and vendor invoice, payment is made.
Check Requisitions Check requisitions are used for payment for services, employee travel, and relatively small dollarreimbursements. Check requisitions, along with the appropriate supporting documentation, areforwarded to the Finance Office for verification, approval, and payment.
Amending the Budget
The budget is legally adopted at the fund and function level. The Board of Trustees must,therefore, approve budget amendments that transfer funds between funds or functions. Forexample, appropriations for instruction cannot be transferred to administration without Boardapproval. All other required transfers that do not involve fund or function changes are reviewed,approved, and processed by the Finance Office.
62
Budget Administration and Management Process (continued)
Amending the Budget (continued)
To reduce the number of transfers that require processing by the Finance Office, budgetarycontrol accounts have been established so that budget managers are able to utilize theirorganization’s funds as necessary within the same fund and function without submitting an officialbudget amendment. Control accounts link several detail expenditure accounts to the samebudgetary control balance. For example, assume that the general supplies detail account at aparticular campus had no remaining budgetary balance and the warehouse supplies detailaccount in the same fund and function had a remaining budget balance. An expenditure could bemade from the general supplies account without doing a budget transfer because the controlaccount (which includes the warehouse supplies account) had enough funds to cover theexpenditure.
Monitoring the Budget
The District’s interactive, on-line budgetary accounting and control system provides many usefulreports to assist Board Members, Finance Office personnel, and budget managers inadministering, monitoring, and controlling the implementation of the budget. This systemprovides many checks on account balances to insure that funds are not over-expended at thebudgetary control account level. If sufficient funds are not available at the budgetary controlaccount level, purchase order and check requisitions cannot be generated. The ExecutiveDirector of Finance carefully monitors comparisons between budget and actual expenditures tomaintain cost control and to insure against over-spending for payroll and related accounts.
On a monthly basis, management reviews financial projection reports generated by the District’saccounting system. At any period of time during the year, financial projections through the end ofthe fiscal year can be generated. This is done by taking the expenditures through a certainspecified period in the current year divided by the percent of expenditures through this sameperiod in the prior year divided by total actual expenditures in the prior year. This process ofreviewing projected year-end expenditure levels, as well as current expenditure levels, providesan increased level of comfort in assuring budgetary compliance.
Relevant financial reports are submitted to the Board of Trustees on a monthly basis. The finalstep in the budget monitoring process is the evaluation of the results of operations that arepresented annually in the District’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR).
Reporting to the Texas Education Agency (TEA)
The District budget must be submitted to TEA via the Public Education Information ManagementSystem (PEIMS) transmission process as of the date established in the annual instructions for thesystem. TEA monitors for compliance at the district level only. This monitoring is a legalrequirement to ensure mandatory expenditure levels in certain areas. In addition, amendedbudgets are reflected on the schedule comparing budget and actual results in the AnnualFinancial and Compliance Report. The requirement for filing the amended budget with TEA isformally met when the District submits its Annual Financial and Compliance Report.
63
Conroe Independent School District
64
Financial Section
Financial Overview
Combined revenues for all funds are budgeted to decrease to $551 million for budget year2016-2017. This decrease is $16.3 million less than the combined projected revenues for 2015-2016. The majority of the decrease is in State revenue in the General Fund due to the RobinHood effect in the funding formulas. As the district’s property values increase, the staterecaptures that increase in value by decreasing funding proportionately in the following fiscalyear. A portion of the recapture was offset by student enrollment growth.
The majority of General and Debt Service fund revenues are generated by tax collections. TheDistrict has experienced dramatic increases in its tax base, averaging 8.2% over the past tenyears.
$-$5,000,000,000
$10,000,000,000$15,000,000,000$20,000,000,000$25,000,000,000$30,000,000,000$35,000,000,000
2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17
Tax Base Trend
`
We have provided several supporting schedules that show the Tax Rate effects for the District onpages 68-69.
Revenues for the Capital Projects fund will be earned by investment income. Additional proceedswill be provided in the Capital Projects Fund from the sale of bonds approved in the 2015 bondreferendum. In the Food Service Fund approximately (57%) of the revenue in this fund isreceived from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) under the National SchoolLunch Program and the School Breakfast Program. The remaining revenue (43%) is primarilygenerated from user fees i.e. student payments for meals. The Food Service revenue isbudgeted to decrease by $1 million or 5.7% less than the 2015-2016 projected revenues.
The total 2016-2017 combined fund expenditures are budgeted to increase to $746 million or20% over 2015-2016 projected expenditure levels. The majority of the increase in expendituresis in the Capital Projects fund for projects approved in the 2015 Bond Referendum. Our numberone goal as a district is student achievement so it is a priority in the budget process to provide thenecessary funding to put an adequate number of teachers in the classroom as well as maintain acompetitive pay structure to retain high quality teachers.
Projected Budget Percent
2015-16 2016-17 Change
General Fund 426,229,201$ 447,580,555$ 5.01%
Debt Service Fund 84,233,299 88,077,713 4.56%
Capital Projects Fund 88,672,280 192,659,698 117.27%
Food Service Fund 19,287,501 18,000,000 -6.68%
Total 618,422,281$ 746,317,966$ 20.68%
Total Expenditures by Fund Comparison
65
2016-17
General Fund Debt Service Capital Pojects Food Service Total
Revenues
5710 Tax Collections 320,698,681$ 77,915,916$ -$ -$ 398,614,597$
5742 Investment earnings 500,000 - - - 500,000
5749 Miscellaneous 4,300,000 - 57,030 - 4,357,030
5751 Food service-meals - - - 7,705,214 7,705,214
Total Local Revenues 325,498,681 77,915,916 57,030 7,705,214 411,176,841
5810 Foundation school program 106,046,130 - - - 106,046,130
5829 Miscellaneous state revenue - 1,547,762 - - 1,547,762
5831 Teacher retirement on-behalf 21,800,000 - - - 21,800,000
Total State Revenues 127,846,130 1,547,762 - - 129,393,892
5921 School breakfast program - - - 2,082,484 2,082,484
5922 National school lunch program - - - 8,212,302 8,212,302
5929 Misc. Federal Revenues - - - - -
Total Federal Revenues - - - 10,294,786 10,294,786
Total Revenues 453,344,811 79,463,678 57,030 18,000,000 550,865,519
Expenditures
11 Instruction 286,530,704 - - - 286,530,704
12 Instructional resources & media 5,302,485 - - - 5,302,485
13 Staff development 3,424,184 - - - 3,424,184
21 Instructional administration 3,862,470 - - - 3,862,470
23 School administration 28,626,120 - - - 28,626,120
31 Guidance and counseling 15,216,342 - - - 15,216,342
32 Social work services 561,501 - - - 561,501
33 Health services 4,855,515 - - - 4,855,515
34 Student transportation 21,604,901 - - - 21,604,901
35 Food services - - - 16,566,000 16,566,000
36 Co-curricular activities 10,367,083 - - - 10,367,083
41 General administration 8,005,664 - - - 8,005,664
51 Plant maintenance & operations 43,264,267 - - 1,434,000 44,698,267
52 School police 5,927,712 - - - 5,927,712
53 Technology 6,313,007 - - - 6,313,007
61 Community service 18,600 - - - 18,600
71 Debt service - 88,077,713 - - 88,077,713
81 Facilities acquisition & const. - - 192,659,698 - 192,659,698
99 Other Intergovernmental 3,700,000 3,700,000
Total Expenditures 447,580,555 88,077,713 192,659,698 18,000,000 746,317,966
Excess Revenues Over Expenditures 5,764,256 (8,614,035) (192,602,668) - (195,452,447)
Other Resources (Uses) - - 148,116,196 - 148,116,196
Fund Balance-Beginning-Projected 126,772,869 32,997,945 117,274,223 2,431,806 279,476,843
Fund Balance-Ending-Projected 132,537,125$ 24,383,910$ 72,787,751$ 2,431,806$ 232,140,592$
Expenditures By Major Object
2016-17
General Fund Debt Service Capital Pojects Food Service Total
6100 Payroll Costs 398,566,754 - - 7,200,000 405,766,754
6200 Purchase & Cont Service 23,543,236 - - 1,439,000 24,982,236
6300 Supplies and Materials 19,056,675 - - 9,270,000 28,326,675
6400 Other Operating Expend 5,890,890 - - 30,000 5,920,890
6500 Debt Service - 88,077,713 - - 88,077,713
6600 Capital Outlay 523,000 - 192,659,698 61,000 193,243,698
Total Expenditures 447,580,555 88,077,713 192,659,698 18,000,000 746,317,966
Note: Please see individual fund sub-sections for more detailed explanations of revenues, expenditures and fund balance.
Conroe Independent School District
Combined Budget Summary: 2016-17 Including 2015-16 Projected and 2014-15 & 2013-14 ActualGeneral Fund, Debt Service Fund, Capital Projects & Food Service Fund
66
2016-17 2015-16 2014-15 2013-14
Total Projected Actual Actual
Revenues
5710 Tax Collections 398,614,597$ 379,125,322$ 344,360,198$ 307,041,674$
5742 Investment earnings 500,000 2,049,597 1,401,637 619,606
5749 Miscellaneous 4,357,030 4,692,617 4,244,960 4,036,629
5751 Food service-meals 7,705,214 7,287,364 7,031,534 7,181,150
Total Local Revenues 411,176,841 393,154,900 357,038,329 318,879,059
5810 Foundation school program 106,046,130 134,757,556 134,575,901 134,153,720
5829 Miscellaneous state revenue 1,547,762 1,745,398 181,219 173,792
5831 Teacher retirement on-behalf 21,800,000 21,568,418 20,170,567 18,440,337
Total State Revenues 129,393,892 158,071,372 154,927,687 152,767,849
5921 School breakfast program 2,082,484 2,107,325 1,982,691 1,976,320
5922 National school lunch program 8,212,302 8,307,723 7,953,730 7,352,284
5929 Misc. Federal Revenues - 5,470,812 4,899,707 4,859,865
Total Federal Revenues 10,294,786 15,885,860 14,836,128 14,188,469
Total Revenues 550,865,519 567,112,132 526,802,144 485,835,377
Expenditures
11 Instruction 286,530,704 269,561,120 247,267,817 228,827,225
12 Instructional resources & media 5,302,485 5,018,660 4,951,934 4,748,783
13 Staff development 3,424,184 3,657,659 3,145,356 2,299,315
21 Instructional administration 3,862,470 3,935,070 3,286,308 2,930,811
23 School administration 28,626,120 28,107,499 26,886,312 24,645,865
31 Guidance and counseling 15,216,342 13,768,281 16,109,307 15,393,597
32 Social work services 561,501 571,904 418,316 325,277
33 Health services 4,855,515 4,960,117 4,727,352 4,165,231
34 Student transportation 21,604,901 20,377,940 19,892,018 18,638,779
35 Food services 16,566,000 17,840,912 17,473,807 17,709,366
36 Co-curricular activities 10,367,083 10,001,132 9,747,914 9,565,486
41 General administration 8,005,664 7,652,233 7,032,406 6,181,130
51 Plant maintenance & operations 44,698,267 43,339,094 45,926,656 41,557,680
52 School police 5,927,712 6,646,406 5,580,730 5,309,822
53 Technology 6,313,007 5,938,024 5,738,640 4,720,848
61 Community service 18,600 10,913 18,202 13,163
71 Debt service 88,077,713 84,233,299 82,992,639 79,448,606
81 Facilities acquisition & const. 192,659,698 89,719,277 36,040,328 64,470,897
99 Other Intergovernmental 3,700,000 3,082,741 2,760,118 2,293,905
Total Expenditures 746,317,966 618,422,281 539,996,160 533,245,786
Excess Revenues Over Expenditures (195,452,447) (51,310,149) (13,194,016) (47,410,409)
Other Resources (Uses) 148,116,196 135,321,085 37,373,212 42,558,113
Fund Balance-Beginning-Projected 279,476,843 195,465,907 171,286,711 176,139,007
Fund Balance-Ending-Projected 232,140,592$ 279,476,843$ 195,465,907$ 171,286,711$
2016-17 2015-16 2014-15 2013-14
Total Projected Actual Actual
6100 Payroll Costs 405,766,754$ 387,091,644$ 359,599,759$ 331,188,585$
6200 Purchase & Cont Service 24,982,236 25,071,782 29,948,638 26,064,930
6300 Supplies and Materials 28,326,675 26,789,974 28,852,163 30,702,531
6400 Other Operating Expend 5,920,890 4,553,597 4,237,144 4,042,313
6500 Debt Service 88,077,713 84,233,299 82,420,693 79,448,606
6600 Capital Outlay 193,243,698 90,681,985 34,937,763 61,798,821
Total Expenditures 746,317,966 618,422,281 539,996,160 533,245,786
Conroe Independent School District
General Fund, Debt Service Fund, Capital Projects & Food Service FundCombined Budget Summary: 2016-17 Including 2015-16 Projected and 2014-15 & 2013-14 Actual
67
General Debt Service Memo
Fund Fund Total
Requirements
Proposed Expenditure Budget 447,580,555$ 88,077,713$ 535,658,268$
Fund Balance Requirement 132,537,125 24,383,910 156,921,035
Total Requirements 580,117,680 112,461,623 692,579,303
Resources
Other Than Tax Levy:
Projected Fund Balance, 8/31/16 126,772,869 32,997,945 159,770,814
State Revenue 106,046,130 1,547,762 107,593,892
TRS On-behalf 21,800,000 - 21,800,000
Other Local Revenues 4,800,000 - 4,800,000
Operating Transfer - - -
Total Non-Tax Resources 259,418,999 34,545,707 293,964,706
Revenue Required From Current Tax Levy 320,698,681 77,915,916 398,614,597
Computation of Tax Rate
Revenue Required From Property Tax Levy 320,698,681 77,915,916 398,614,597
Estimated Taxable Value 32,423,298,323 32,423,298,323 32,423,298,323
Collection Rate Factor 95.30% 100.00% 95.30%
Adjusted Net Estimated Taxable Value 30,899,403,302 32,423,298,323 30,899,403,302
Tax Rate Needed Per $100 Valuation 1.04 0.240 1.280
Tax Rate Recommended 1.04$ 0.240 1.280
Prior Year Tax Rate 1.04$ 0.240 1.280
Conroe Independent School District
Combined Property Tax Rate Calculation Worksheet2016-2017
68
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Assessed/Market value of a home 218,246$ 226,515$ 252,948$ 283,155$ 296,236$
Less: Homestead exemption 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 25,000
Taxable value 203,246 211,515 237,948 268,155 271,236
Total property tax rate 1.2900 1.2850 1.2800 1.2800 1.2800
Property tax due 2,622$ 2,718$ 3,046$ 3,432$ 3,472$
Percent of property tax due increase 0.02% 3.67% 12.06% 12.69% 1.15%
(decrease) from prior year
Each year the Montgomery County Appraisal District appraises property based on market conditions such as sales in
the surrounding areas. The above schedule shows how market conditions & tax rates would affect the amount of
property tax due through 2016-17 based on the overall trends of the District.
Conroe Independent School District
Impact of Budget on Taxpayers
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Property Tax Due
69
District County Total Rate General Debt Service
New Caney Montgomery 1.67000 1.170000 0.50000
Crosby Harris 1.67000 1.170000 0.50000
Splendora Montgomery 1.60000 1.170000 0.43000
Galena Park Harris 1.56330 1.243300 0.32000
Deer Park Harris 1.55670 1.236700 0.32000
Humble Harris 1.52000 1.170000 0.35000
Katy Harris 1.51660 1.126600 0.39000
Spring Harris 1.46996 1.040000 0.42996
Cy-Fair Harris 1.44000 1.040000 0.40000
Goose Creek Harris 1.43189 1.040000 0.39189
Klein Harris 1.43000 1.040000 0.39000
LaPorte Harris 1.42000 1.040000 0.38000
Sheldon Harris 1.41000 1.170000 0.24000
Huffman Harris 1.40000 1.040000 0.36000
Channel View Harris 1.39600 1.040000 0.35600
Spring Branch Harris 1.39450 1.090000 0.30450
Willis Montgomery 1.39000 1.040000 0.35000
Magnolia Montgomery 1.37950 1.040000 0.33950
Montgomery Montgomery 1.37000 1.040000 0.33000
Pasadena Harris 1.35000 1.070000 0.28000
Tomball Harris 1.34000 1.020000 0.32000
Aldine Harris 1.32339 1.133388 0.19000
Alief Harris 1.30500 1.125000 0.18000
Conroe Montgomery 1.28000 1.040000 0.24000
Houston Harris 1.20670 1.026700 0.18000
Average Tax Rate 1.43334 1.09447 0.33887
Conroe Tax Rate 1.28000 1.04000 0.24000
Tax Rate ComparisonAll Harris and Montgomery County School Districts
Sorted by Combined Tax Rate
Fiscal Year 2016-2017
70
Combined Tax Rate Comparisonwith area School Districts
1.20
1.25
1.30
1.35
1.40
1.45
1.50
1.55
Humble Katy Spring Cy-Fair Klein Conroe
71
Conroe Independent School District
72
Financial Section General Fund
General Fund
The General Fund is the District’s principal fund, accounting for the majority of current operatingexpenditures. Recorded in the General Fund are transactions encompassing the approvedcurrent operating budget, related revenues, expenditures, assets, liabilities, and fund balance.Financial transactions of the District are recorded in detail in the general ledger by objects andfunctions within projects and programs. This fund has often been described as an operating orcurrent fund and includes revenues from an ad valorem local maintenance tax, state funding, andother sources such as tuition, fees, and investment earnings.
Revenue Trends and Assumptions
Enrollment Trend
The major estimate necessary to build the General Fund budget is student enrollment. Staterevenue estimates, as well as the campus expenditure budget allocations, rely heavily onenrollment data. The District has experienced significant increases in enrollment over the last tenyears of approximately 13,000 students. This trend is expected to continue for the foreseeablefuture. Enrollment growth presents District personnel with significant challenges includingadditional personnel, instructional facilities, supplies, and materials.
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
55,000
60,000
65,000
07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17
Enrollment Trend
State Funding Trend
State funding provides 28% of the revenue necessary to fund operating expenditures. The TexasLegislature meets biennially unless the Governor requests a special session. Senate Bill 1(S.B.1) was passed by the 84th Regular Session of the Texas Legislature authorized a healthyincrease, $1.5 billion over the biennium, to the formulas used to calculate Foundation SchoolProgram funding for Texas school districts.
For additional information on the State of Texas budget visit this website.http://www.lbb.state.tx.us/.
The two primary components of the funding formula are (Tier I and II). The Tier I component ofschool funding represents the cost of providing basic educational services for students in thedistrict. Tier I provides funding for regular education, special education, compensatory education,bilingual education, gifted and talented education, career and technology education andtransportation. Under Tier I, the State subsidizes tax receipts as needed to produce a basicallotment for each student in average daily attendance. The district’s portion is calculated byusing the compressed tax rate (2005 adopted maintenance and operations [M&O] rate multipliedby 0.6667). S.B.1 increased the basic allotment to $5,140 per average daily attendance A.D.A.
73
State Funding Trend (continued)
In Tier II, the state will subsidize tax receipts as needed to produce a guaranteed level of revenueper student per penny of property tax levy. The guaranteed yield program provides funds foreducational services beyond the basic programs financed through Tier 1. The first level of Tier IIwas collapsed into the basic allotment so that the guaranteed yield for enrichment is paid on thetax effort that exceeds the compressed rate. The Tier II, Level II yield per student in weightedaverage daily attendance (WADA) was maintained at $77.53.
Detailed calculations of State revenue estimates are located in the Informational Section of thisdocument and summarized below.
Projected Budget
2015-16 2016-17
Tier I :
Total allocation 379,367,322$ 386,045,466$
Less: Local Share (259,787,276) (293,904,641)
State share of Tier I 119,580,046 92,140,825
Tier II 13,124,497 12,500,995
Other Programs 2,149,253 1,404,310
Total state revenue 134,853,796$ 106,046,130$
Tax Base Trend
The largest portion of funding in the General Fund is derived from local funding sources, primarilyproperty taxes, which accounts for 71% of total budgeted funds. In order to budget both Stateand local revenues, the District must accurately estimate the taxable value of property within theDistrict. The Montgomery County Appraisal District (MCAD) appraises all District property. Taxesare calculated by dividing the assessed property value (less the homestead exemption amount, ifapplicable) by 100 and multiplying by the tax rate. The District’s tax base continues to grow at avery healthy rate averaging 8.2% growth over the last 10 years. Conroe ISD’s maintenance andoperations tax rate will remain unchanged at $1.04 for 2016-17.
$-$5,000,000,000
$10,000,000,000$15,000,000,000$20,000,000,000$25,000,000,000$30,000,000,000$35,000,000,000
2011/12 2012/13 2013/14 2014/15 2015/16 2016/17
Tax Base Trend
`
74
Revenue Trends and Assumptions (continued)
The State revenue sources discussed above and local revenue from property tax collectionsmake up approximately 94% of total revenue. The majority of the remaining 6% is amountscontributed by the State to the Teacher Retirement System (TRS) on behalf of the District’semployees. This amount is also recognized as an expenditure. The revenue estimate is setequal to the expenditure estimation, which is calculated at 7.8% of eligible earnings.
Projected Budget Percent
2015-16 2016-17 Change
Local Sources 314,016,139$ 325,498,681$ 3.66%
State sources 156,422,214 127,846,130 -18.27%
Federal sources 4,176,125 - -100.00%
Total 474,614,478$ 453,344,811$ -4.48%
General Fund Revenue Sources Comparison
Student Demographics
The District’s student demographics consist of 50% White, 35.9% Hispanic, 6.7% AfricanAmerican, and 7.4% other. The District’s demographics are illustrated in the chart below.
The District has an economically disadvantaged rate of 36%.
50.0%
35.9%
6.7%
7.4%
Conroe ISD Student Demographics
White Hispanic African American Other
75
Expenditure Summary
The total General Fund expenditure budget for 2016-17 is $447,580,555. This is an increase of$21,351,354 or 5% over projected 2015-16 expenditure levels. As always, the majority of aschool district’s expenditures are for personnel costs (89.1%).
The compensation package provided for in the budget includes a competitive salary increase of$1,650 for teachers, librarians and nurses. Support personnel received a 3.0% increase on themidpoint. The approximate cost of these salary increases is $11.8 million
Other major General Fund expenditures include:
• Additional personnel related to growth $8.1 million
• Supplies and materials for enhancements related to the District’s Career & Technologyprograms of $2 million.
• Additional contribution to the Health Insurance Fund of $750 thousand.
Impact on Fund Balance
The District’s fund balance in fiscal year 2015-16 is projected to be $126,772,869. This projectedbalance represents approximately three months of expenditures or 28% of the annual budgetedexpenditures and provides needed stability given significant uncertainty in projections of futurerevenues and expenditures. Fund balance is budgeted to increase by $5.7 million in 2016-17 asa result of increased revenue from property tax collections. While we will benefit from the taxrevenue growth in this year our focus was on planning for future reductions in funding from thestate due to the increased property values and as a result the budget was adopted with a knownsurplus.
0
10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
60,000,000
70,000,000
80,000,000
90,000,000
100,000,000
110,000,000
120,000,000
130,000,000
140,000,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
General Fund Balances
Required Minimum Balance Fund Balance in Excess of Minimum
The District goal is to maintain an unassigned fund balance of 16% to 24% of the annual budget.The district is currently at 28% which is well over our high end of our target.
76
Conroe Independent School District
77
2015-16
2014-15 Amended 2015-16 2016-17 Percent
Actual Budget Projected Proposed Inc/Dec
Revenues
5710 Tax collections 279,980,073$ 294,339,111$ 308,040,076$ 320,698,681$ 4.11%
5742 Investment earnings 692,090 250,000 1,283,446 500,000 -61.04%
5749 Miscellaneous 4,244,960 4,309,389 4,692,617 4,300,000 -8.37%
Total Local Revenues 284,917,123 298,898,500 314,016,139 325,498,681 3.66%
5810 Foundation school program 134,675,271 123,296,322 134,853,796 106,046,130 -21.36%
5831 Teacher retirement on-behalf 20,170,567 21,800,000 21,568,418 21,800,000 1.07%
Total State Revenues 154,845,838 145,096,322 156,422,214 127,846,130 -18.27%
5929 Misc. federal revenues 3,929,257 561,906 4,176,125 - -100.00%
Total Revenues 443,692,218 444,556,728 474,614,478 453,344,811 -4.48%
Expenditures
11 Instruction 247,267,817 271,660,961 269,561,120 286,530,704 6.30%
12 Instructional resources & media 4,951,934 5,235,114 5,018,660 5,302,485 5.66%
13 Staff development 3,145,356 3,922,184 3,657,659 3,424,184 -6.38%
21 Instructional administration 3,286,308 4,192,486 3,935,070 3,862,470 -1.84%
23 School administration 26,886,312 28,230,394 28,107,499 28,626,120 1.85%
31 Guidance and counseling 16,109,307 15,154,730 13,768,281 15,216,342 10.52%
32 Social work services 418,316 592,664 571,904 561,501 -1.82%
33 Health service 4,727,352 5,543,111 4,960,117 4,855,515 -2.11%
34 Student transportation 19,892,018 21,269,501 20,377,940 21,604,901 6.02%
36 Co-curricular activities 9,747,914 10,383,450 10,001,132 10,367,083 3.66%
41 General administration 7,032,406 8,532,077 7,652,233 8,005,664 4.62%
51 Plant maintenance & operations 41,821,469 43,705,813 41,892,505 43,264,267 3.27%
52 School police 5,580,730 7,052,922 6,646,406 5,927,712 -10.81%
53 Technology 5,738,640 6,825,623 5,938,024 6,313,007 6.31%
61 Community service 18,202 18,733 10,913 18,600 70.44%
81 Facilities acquisition & const. 571,946 1,252,093 1,046,997 - -100.00%
99 Other Intergovernmental 2,760,118 3,200,000 3,082,741 3,700,000 20.02%
Total Expenditures 399,956,145 436,771,856 426,229,201 447,580,555 5.01%
Other Financing Sources & Uses
Other 23,300,000 43,300,000 43,300,000 - 100.00%
Total Other Financing Sources & Uses 23,300,000 43,300,000 43,300,000 - 100.00%
Total 423,256,145 480,071,856 469,529,201 447,580,555 -4.67%
Excess Revenues Over Expenditures 20,436,073$ (35,515,128)$ 5,085,277$ 5,764,256$
General Fund
Budget Summary: 2016-2017Summary by Major Object and Function
78
2015-16
2014-15 Amended 2015-16 2016-17 Percent Percent
Actual Budget Projected Proposed Inc/Dec of Total
6100 Payroll Cost 352,362,322$ 380,286,888$ 379,612,244$ 398,566,754$ 4.99% 89.06%
6200 Purchase & cont. serv. 25,615,061 27,613,722 23,555,684 23,543,236 -0.05% 5.26%
6300 Supplies and materials 15,601,150 21,085,826 16,564,733 19,056,675 15.04% 4.26%
6400 Other operating expend 4,215,875 5,211,845 4,517,653 5,890,890 30.40% 1.32%
6600 Capital outlay 2,161,737 2,573,575 1,978,887 523,000 -73.57% 0.12%
Total Expenditures 399,956,145$ 436,771,856$ 426,229,201$ 447,580,555$ 5.01% 100%
Budget Summary: 2016-2017Expenditure Summary by Major Object
General Fund
89.06%
5.26%4.26%
1.32%
0.12%
Expenditures by Major Object
Payroll Cost
Purchase & cont. serv.
Supplies and materials
Other operating expend
Capital outlay
79
General Fund
2015-16 2016-17
2014-15 Amended 2015-16 Proposed
Actual Budget Projected Budget
Instruction
11 61-Payroll 239,871,891$ 261,270,693$ 261,209,026$ 276,637,576$
62-Contracted Services 1,730,718 1,800,419 1,379,762 1,089,184
63-Supplies 4,905,116 7,628,073 6,127,960 7,951,015
64-Other 550,588 712,259 614,840 762,929
66-Equipment 209,504 249,517 229,532 90,000
247,267,817 271,660,961 269,561,120 286,530,704
Instructional Resources
and Media Services
12 61-Payroll 4,342,285 4,531,677 4,412,309 4,629,349
62-Contracted Services 40,935 66,522 29,619 53,095
63-Supplies 566,924 634,577 576,079 619,941
64-Other 1,790 662 653 100
66-Equipment - 1,676 - -
4,951,934 5,235,114 5,018,660 5,302,485
Staff Development
13 61-Payroll 2,960,502 3,389,075 3,490,607 3,349,944
62-Contracted Services 91,339 182,092 85,115 22,000
63-Supplies 63,489 319,705 53,709 12,450
64-Other 30,026 31,312 28,228 39,790
66-Equipment - - - -
3,145,356 3,922,184 3,657,659 3,424,184
Instructional Administration
21 61-Payroll 2,720,582 3,038,382 3,161,787 3,146,725
62-Contracted Services 183,504 403,547 248,646 209,791
63-Supplies 254,527 576,503 383,811 365,384
64-Other 127,695 174,054 140,826 140,570
66-Equipment - - - -
3,286,308 4,192,486 3,935,070 3,862,470
Budget Summary: 2016-2017Expenditure Summary by Major Object within Function
80
General Fund
2015-16 2016-17
2014-15 Amended 2015-16 Proposed
Actual Budget Projected Budget
Budget Summary: 2016-2017Expenditure Summary by Major Object within Function
School Administration
23 61-Payroll 26,700,541 27,966,169 27,907,219 28,372,613
62-Contracted Services 13,731 19,469 13,888 9,488
63-Supplies 109,523 173,122 122,368 186,019
64-Other 62,517 71,559 64,024 58,000
66-Equipment - 75 - -
26,886,312 28,230,394 28,107,499 28,626,120
Guidance and Counseling
31 61-Payroll 15,538,727 13,584,215 13,078,201 14,631,846
62-Contracted Services 186,609 183,230 146,681 156,879
63-Supplies 345,048 1,328,452 495,292 359,463
64-Other 38,923 58,833 48,107 68,154
66-Equipment - - - -
16,109,307 15,154,730 13,768,281 15,216,342
Social Work Services
32 61-Payroll 401,340 574,817 555,066 551,901
62-Contracted Services 6,445 185 185 -
63-Supplies 10,531 4,433 4,418 7,300
64-Other - 13,229 12,235 2,300
66-Equipment - - - -
418,316 592,664 571,904 561,501
Health Services
33 61-Payroll 4,415,789 4,718,898 4,739,299 4,726,815
62-Contracted Services 203,853 224,687 104,152 2,500
63-Supplies 81,477 578,648 98,064 125,700
64-Other 19,348 14,903 12,627 500
66-Equipment 6,885 5,975 5,975 -
4,727,352 5,543,111 4,960,117 4,855,515
81
General Fund
2015-16 2016-17
2014-15 Amended 2015-16 Proposed
Actual Budget Projected Budget
Budget Summary: 2016-2017Expenditure Summary by Major Object within Function
Student Transportation
34 61-Payroll 15,686,305 17,844,706 17,719,302 18,348,114
62-Contracted Services 397,300 386,446 326,407 173,500
63-Supplies 3,480,395 2,462,123 1,933,914 2,793,587
64-Other 328,018 415,774 383,952 289,700
66-Equipment - 160,452 14,365 -
19,892,018 21,269,501 20,377,940 21,604,901
Co-Curricular Activities
36 61-Payroll 6,168,393 6,119,394 6,223,534 6,181,056
62-Contracted Services 336,529 538,763 405,320 516,195
63-Supplies 1,179,999 1,408,251 1,297,898 864,511
64-Other 2,038,203 2,295,952 2,073,815 2,796,321
66-Equipment 24,790 21,090 565 9,000
9,747,914 10,383,450 10,001,132 10,367,083
General Administration
41 61-Payroll 5,264,186 5,530,869 5,629,181 5,999,463
62-Contracted Services 1,207,881 1,598,607 1,374,740 576,897
63-Supplies 149,337 716,388 238,091 368,239
64-Other 352,742 677,659 401,667 1,053,565
66-Equipment 58,260 8,554 8,554 7,500
7,032,406 8,532,077 7,652,233 8,005,664
Plant Maintenance
and Operation
51 61-Payroll 19,964,035 22,104,611 22,304,248 22,608,849
62-Contracted Services 16,754,171 16,798,903 14,872,079 15,530,393
63-Supplies 3,486,669 3,622,688 3,693,432 4,088,414
64-Other 625,337 682,256 679,302 620,111
66-Equipment 991,257 497,355 343,444 416,500
41,821,469 43,705,813 41,892,505 43,264,267
82
General Fund
2015-16 2016-17
2014-15 Amended 2015-16 Proposed
Actual Budget Projected Budget
Budget Summary: 2016-2017Expenditure Summary by Major Object within Function
School Police
52 61-Payroll 5,046,661 5,872,426 5,486,901 5,529,723
62-Contracted Services 109,562 134,524 129,558 99,337
63-Supplies 228,638 796,286 784,364 259,652
64-Other 27,222 33,025 28,922 39,000
66-Equipment 168,647 216,661 216,661 -
5,580,730 7,052,922 6,646,406 5,927,712
Technology
53 61-Payroll 3,274,108 3,739,823 3,693,589 3,851,780
62-Contracted Services 1,585,361 2,064,328 1,350,174 1,391,977
63-Supplies 737,578 834,577 754,703 1,053,000
64-Other 11,145 26,768 26,764 16,250
66-Equipment 130,448 160,127 112,794 -
5,738,640 6,825,623 5,938,024 6,313,007
Community Service
61 61-Payroll 6,977 1,133 1,975 1,000
62-Contracted Services 7,005 12,000 6,617 12,000
63-Supplies 1,899 2,000 630 2,000
64-Other 2,321 3,600 1,691 3,600
66-Equipment - - - -
18,202 18,733 10,913 18,600
Facilities Acquisition
and Construction
81 66-Equipment 571,946 1,252,093 1,046,997 -
571,946 1,252,093 1,046,997 -
Other Intergovernmental
99 62-Contracted Services 2,760,118 3,200,000 3,082,741 3,700,000
2,760,118 3,200,000 3,082,741 3,700,000
Other Uses 23,300,000 43,300,000 43,300,000 -
Total 423,256,145$ 480,071,856$ 469,529,201$ 447,580,555$
83
Contracted Supplies & Capital
Payroll Services Materials Other Outlay
Organization 6100 6200 6300 6400 6600 Total
101 Anderson Elementary 4,023,633$ 117,833$ 113,219$ 12,075$ -$ 4,266,760$
102 Austin Elementary 5,315,289 141,918 149,781 8,175 - 5,615,163
103 Runyan Elementary 4,113,032 114,598 107,449 6,625 - 4,341,704
104 Sam Houston Elementary 4,138,145 100,928 111,673 8,175 - 4,358,921
105 Milam Elementary 4,316,871 135,633 114,550 6,125 - 4,573,179
106 Creighton Elementary 4,975,366 108,778 107,169 18,686 - 5,209,999
107 Armstrong Elementary 3,890,448 100,353 95,826 15,875 - 4,102,502
108 Lamar Elementary 3,645,274 134,883 82,868 1,525 - 3,864,550
109 Oak Ridge Elementary 3,708,106 190,243 93,363 4,550 - 3,996,262
111 Houser Elementary 4,365,162 187,673 105,960 3,125 - 4,661,920
112 Ford Elementary 4,923,636 222,478 122,940 550 - 5,269,604
113 Hailey Elementary 3,751,491 122,293 82,531 2,625 - 3,958,940
114 B. B. Rice Elementary 3,844,114 106,168 94,218 4,462 - 4,048,962
115 San Jacinto Elementary 3,813,916 109,393 100,286 3,575 - 4,027,170
116 Glen Loch Elementary 3,680,759 96,998 85,980 550 - 3,864,287
117 Sally Ride Elementary 3,732,668 93,163 77,553 921 - 3,904,305
118 David Elementary 3,252,895 107,223 76,997 505 - 3,437,620
119 Giesinger Elementary 3,124,611 114,648 79,752 415 - 3,319,426
120 Galatas Elementary 3,633,233 107,488 83,058 1,436 - 3,825,215
121 Barbara Bush Elementary 3,921,011 110,773 82,371 675 - 4,114,830
122 Colin Powell Elementary 4,027,570 104,048 82,527 975 - 4,215,120
123 Buckalew Elementary 3,593,756 134,208 82,626 2,265 - 3,812,855
124 Reaves Elementary 3,800,572 135,853 107,634 2,925 - 4,046,984
125 Kaufman Elementary 4,371,871 186,813 105,915 2,225 4,666,824
126 Wilkinson Elementary 3,533,856 156,863 88,045 975 - 3,779,739
127 Broadway Elementary 5,386,236 217,053 130,383 5,175 - 5,738,847
128 Patterson Elementary 3,935,851 170,516 116,730 825 - 4,223,922
129 Birnham Woods Elementary 5,115,280 173,548 131,614 3,076 - 5,423,518
130 Stewart Elementary 4,410,204 171,171 100,381 2,375 - 4,684,131
131 Snyder Elementary 4,902,035 183,463 124,443 555 - 5,210,496
Total Elementary Schools 123,246,891 4,157,001 3,037,842 122,021 - 130,563,755
General Fund
Budget Summary: 2016-2017Major Object Summary by Campus
84
Contracted Supplies & Capital
Payroll Services Materials Other Outlay
Organization 6100 6200 6300 6400 6600 Total
General Fund
Budget Summary: 2016-2017Major Object Summary by Campus
045 Wilkerson Intermediate 4,234,891 123,698 95,699 175 - 4,454,463
050 Collins Intermediate 3,510,290 102,348 89,480 175 - 3,702,293
067 Mitchell Intermediate 6,038,680 183,143 131,337 3,350 - 6,356,510
068 Grangerland Intermediate 5,574,651 345,878 147,628 7,515 - 6,075,672
069 Dolly Vogel Intermediate 5,586,811 255,843 133,082 2,275 - 5,978,011
070 Travis Intermediate 3,789,935 242,073 129,127 765 - 4,161,900
071 Coulson Tough K-6 5,333,929 251,898 123,026 3,775 - 5,712,628
073 Cryar Intermediate 3,991,938 179,323 92,940 575 - 4,264,776
074 Joel Deretchin K-6 5,325,329 171,833 113,192 4,675 - 5,615,029
077 Tom Cox Intermediate 6,133,645 184,145 135,527 4,872 - 6,458,189
078 Bozman Intermediate 4,690,334 164,033 120,750 415 - 4,975,532
Total Intermediate Schools 54,210,433 2,204,215 1,311,788 28,567 - 57,755,003
041 Peet Junior High 7,426,819 297,628 304,643 36,098 - 8,065,188
043 Washington Junior High 5,834,699 218,453 237,342 42,125 - 6,332,619
046 Knox Junior High 6,784,671 273,403 278,040 27,550 - 7,363,664
049 York Junior High 6,043,013 300,151 297,073 26,696 - 6,666,933
051 Moorhead Junior High 6,898,029 312,353 300,676 36,980 - 7,548,038
053 McCullough Junior High 10,742,200 389,037 430,043 36,640 - 11,597,920
054 Irons Junior High 6,344,873 204,220 286,328 28,846 6,864,267
Total Junior High Schools 50,074,304 1,995,245 2,134,145 234,935 - 54,438,629
001 Conroe High 21,935,488 1,076,995 1,532,597 267,775 9,000 24,821,855
002 Hauke Alternative 1,990,680 78,827 125,527 2,500 - 2,197,534
003 The Woodlands High 22,476,489 968,717 1,411,308 351,029 - 25,207,543
005 Oak Ridge High 21,280,693 989,578 1,297,684 252,698 - 23,820,653
006 Academy of Science & Technology 767,165 9,572 52,143 4,850 - 833,730
010 Discipline Alternative - JJAEP 1,765,638 14,224 63,689 4,000 - 1,847,551
011 Caney Creek High 12,839,935 410,505 844,420 219,626 - 14,314,486
013 Academy of Science & Health 738,033 3,250 85,770 4,900 - 831,953
014 The Woodlands College Park High 15,694,578 729,885 1,008,072 225,250 - 17,657,785
201 Juvenile Detention 430,935 10,200 1,802 - - 442,937
Total High Schools 99,919,634 4,291,753 6,423,012 1,332,628 9,000 111,976,027
Total Campus Costs 327,451,262$ 12,648,214$ 12,906,787$ 1,718,151$ 9,000$ 354,733,414$
Percent of Total 92.31% 3.57% 3.64% 0.48% 0.00% 100.00%
85
Actual Actual Actual Projected Budgeted
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Revenues
Local sources 234,580,314$ 252,830,483$ 284,917,123$ 314,016,139$ 325,498,681$
State sources 132,087,800 152,693,932 154,845,838 156,422,214 127,846,130
Federal sources 2,113,628 3,829,629 3,929,257 4,176,125 -
Total Revenues 368,781,742 409,354,044 443,692,218 474,614,478 453,344,811
Expenditures
Instruction 212,240,758 228,827,225 247,267,817 269,561,120 286,530,704
Instructional resources & media 4,605,708 4,748,783 4,951,934 5,018,660 5,302,485
Staff development 1,321,864 2,299,315 3,145,356 3,657,659 3,424,184
Instructional administration 2,315,046 2,930,811 3,286,308 3,935,070 3,862,470
School administration 22,764,530 24,645,865 26,886,312 28,107,499 28,626,120
Guidance and counseling 13,758,736 15,393,597 16,109,307 13,768,281 15,216,342
Social work services 282,461 325,277 418,316 571,904 561,501
Health service 3,847,072 4,165,231 4,727,352 4,960,117 4,855,515
Student transportation 17,945,772 18,638,779 19,892,018 20,377,940 21,604,901
Co-curricular activities 8,924,041 9,565,486 9,747,914 10,001,132 10,367,083
General administration 6,006,312 6,181,130 7,032,406 7,652,233 8,005,664
Plant maintenance & operations 34,749,588 38,466,230 41,821,469 41,892,505 43,264,267
School police 4,366,340 5,309,822 5,580,730 6,646,406 5,927,712
Technology 4,271,988 4,720,848 5,738,640 5,938,024 6,313,007
Community service 19,538 13,163 18,202 10,913 18,600
Facilities acquisition & const. 105,748 71,290 571,946 1,046,997 -
Other Intergovernmental 2,011,439 2,293,905 2,760,118 3,082,741 3,700,000
Total Expenditures 339,536,941 368,596,757 399,956,145 426,229,201 447,580,555
Revenues Over Expenditures 29,244,801 40,757,287 43,736,073 48,385,277 5,764,256
Other Financing Sources
Operating transfers in (out) (28,156,151) (40,500,000) (23,300,000) (43,300,000) -
Other resources - - - - -
Bond proceeds - - - - -
Total Other Financing Sources (28,156,151) (40,500,000) (23,300,000) (43,300,000) -
Revenues and Other Sources Over
Expenditures and Other 1,088,650 257,287 20,436,073 5,085,277 5,764,256
Fund Balance, beginning 99,905,582 100,994,232 101,251,519 121,687,592 126,772,869
Fund Balance, ending 100,994,232$ 101,251,519$ 121,687,592$ 126,772,869$ 132,537,125$
General Fund
Five Year Summary of Revenues and Expenditures
Years Ended August 31, 2013 - August 31, 2017 (Budgeted)
86
Organization Summaries
The organizations within Conroe Independent School District are divided into seven major divisions listed below.
Superintendent of Schools Deputy Superintendent Deputy Superintendent Finance
Board of Trustees Communications Elementary Education Central Warehouse
Internal Auditor Graphics/Printing Secondary Education
Planning & Construction Athletics/Natatorium
Maintenance Health Services
Grounds Maintenance Curriculum & Instruction
Custodial Services Guidance & Counseling
Transportation Assessment & Research
Technology / MIS Special Education
Staff Development
Community Outreach
Human Resources
Legal Police Department 5 Senior High Schools
2 High School Academies
7 Junior High Schools
9 Intermediate Schools
3 Elem/Inter School (K-6)
29 Elementary Schools
1 Alternative High School
1 Disciplinary Alternative School
Juvenile Detention
Summer School
of Schools
Deputy SuperintendentSuperintendent/
Legal Services
Board of Operations
Security Campuses
Financial Services
Deputy Superintendent
87
Organizational Overview In the following pages of this document is an overview of the seven organizational divisions of the Conroe Independent School District. Each of the eight divisions has departments that are essential to the success of that area of expertise or responsibility. Each division may consist of one department or multiple departments. The overview will describe the activities, services, or functions of each division as well as the district employee who leads the division.
Superintendent/Board Superintendent of Schools – Dr. Don Stockton
This division consists of three areas: The Superintendent of Schools’ Office, the Board of Trustees, and the Internal Auditor. The Superintendent of Schools’ Office provides leadership, direction, coordination, and management of the District including the supervision of all employees, schools, and students. This office also presides over and facilitates meetings of the Board of Trustees, including the preparation of official minutes of the Board meetings. This division is also responsible for holding school district elections. The Board of Trustees conducts official meetings, legally required hearings, and work sessions to govern the District in all areas. The Board is also responsible for approving the budget and amendments to the budget, district policies, certifying legal documents, and signing all contracts. The office of the Internal Auditor provides the audit function for all areas of the District. These duties include auditing student activity funds, capital projects, and other areas of concern as requested by the Superintendent or the Audit Committee.
Deputy Superintendent of Operations
Deputy Superintendent of Operations – Dr. Chris Hines The Deputy Superintendent of Operations division is comprised of nine areas: the Deputy Superintendent of Operations’ office, Communications, Graphics and Printing, Planning and Construction, Maintenance, Grounds Maintenance, Custodial Services, Transportation, and Technology/MIS. The Deputy Superintendent oversees these nine departments, assists the Superintendent, as well as coordinates several district activities. The Communication Services department is comprised of three components: Communications, Graphics, and the District Print Shop. The Conroe ISD Communications Department provides factual information representing the programs and people of CISD to all patrons in a timely and efficient manner. The Communications Office produces district-level publications and maintains and updates information daily on the CISD Website. General information items produced by the Communications Office include the CISD Overview and the CISD Campus Profiles, among others. The Communications Office is also responsible for the assembly and publication of the CISD Board Agenda, Board Book, and Board Meeting Summary. The Communications Department also serves as a direct liaison to the media, and fields media calls and inquiries on a daily basis. The department also addresses general information requests from those within and beyond the district boundaries who seek information on the District. The Graphics Department designs and creates district documents, as well as campus and departmental publications. The District’s Print Shop prints district publications and various projects requested by campuses and departments. The Print Shop is also in charge of the collection and delivery of the mail, both externally and internally. Planning and Construction supports the District by providing services to plan, construct, renovate, remodel, and maintain the physical facilities of the District. The Maintenance and Ground Maintenance departments provide the repair and upkeep of the District’s facilities, grounds, and equipment to ensure that a safe, functional environment is available for the education of all students. Custodial Services provides for the training, coordination, and supervision of the daily cleaning activities for all custodial personnel. Additional functions of the Custodial Services department includes the coordination of the District’s biannual auction. The Transportation Department is charged with the safe transport of students to and from school as well as
88
the maintenance of the District’s buses. The Technology Department provides the acquisition, implementation, and utilization of all technologies that relate to instruction, instructional support, and administration. In addition, Technology plans, installs, and maintains the hardware, software, and communications infrastructure for the network systems upon which instructional and administrative applications are run. Technology provides systems and applications software services to the District for the Management Information Systems such as data processing support of central departments such as Payroll, Human Resources, Purchasing, Finance, and all campuses. The Director of Technology also oversees PEIMS (Public Education Information Management System) and Pupil Accounting as well as Library Services. The PEIMS department collects student, financial, and personnel data required for state reporting. Pupil Accounting provides oversight for student admissions and collects, maintains, and distributes student inactive and archival records.
Deputy Superintendent of Schools
Deputy Superintendent of Schools – Dr. Curtis Null
The Deputy Superintendent of Schools division consists of several departments including: the office of the Deputy Superintendent of Schools, the offices of the Assistant Superintendents for Elementary and Secondary Education, Athletics, Health Services, Curriculum & Instruction, Guidance and Counseling, Assessment and Evaluation, Special Education, Staff Development, Community Outreach, and Human Resources. The Deputy Superintendent of Schools oversees all areas of the department. The Assistant Superintendents for Elementary and Secondary Education oversee the campus principals and all departmental heads of curriculum and ensure that all district, state, and federal guidelines are being met. In addition, the Assistant Superintendents make presentations to the Board of Trustees updating them on the educational status of the Districts’ students. The Athletics department provides a comprehensive program of competitive athletics for students in grades seven through twelve. The following sports are available for the students: boys – baseball, basketball, cross country, football, golf, power lifting, soccer, swimming, tennis, track, and wrestling; girls – basketball, cross country, golf, soccer, softball, swimming, tennis, track, and volleyball. The Athletics department schedules all events, arranges for the transportation of the students, and buys all equipment. Health Services oversees the nurses and nurses’ aides, and provides all necessary supplies to the campus clinics. The Curriculum department is comprised of departmental heads of each subject area, including Language Arts, Math, Science and Health, Social Studies, Career and Technology, Gifted and Talented, Fine Arts, Early Childhood, Parent Involvement, Bilingual and ESL, and Textbooks. These department heads are responsible for planning and implementing the District’s challenging comprehensive curriculum, which is aligned with the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills and state and national assessments, to ensure that every student is prepared to pass the state assessment tests. They provide administrative leadership and guidance functions of their respective departments. Many of the department heads are also responsible for applying, budgeting, implementing, and administering state and federal grant programs. Guidance and Counseling promotes and supports the academic success and personal well-being of all students. One of the responsibilities of the Assessment and Evaluation department is overseeing the mandatory assessments testing of the District’s students. The Special Education department is responsible for meeting the needs of all special needs children in the District. In addition this department applies, budgets, implements, and administers state and federal special education grant programs. The Staff Development Department is responsible for coordinating CISD activities, Organizational Health program activities, graduate degree cohort programs with several universities, TxBESS first year teacher mentor program, and first year administrators mentor program. In addition, the Staff Development Department coordinates activities of numerous consultants; coordinates activities associated with the professional development library; coordinates activities associated with the National Board Certification Program; coordinates and publishes the CISD Staff Development Catalog; coordinates all activities held in the Professional Development Center; and coordinates the implementation of a wide variety of staff development programs for the District. The Human Resources department serves the District through multiple functions. Such services include the recruitment, interviewing, hiring, and processing activities to fill teacher and all job classification vacancies. In addition, the Human Resources department oversees
89
the maintaining of personnel records, certification, and employee benefits for all district employees as well as maintaining a computerized system to provide substitute employees.
Financial Services Chief Financial Officer – Darrin Rice
The Financial Services division is comprised of two departments: Finance and Central Warehouse. The Finance department is responsible for all cash and investing functions, accounting for special revenue and bond funds, accounting and financial reporting, payroll, accounts payable, purchasing, and fixed asset management. In addition, the Finance Department coordinates, develops, and controls the District’s annual budget based on district policies and TEA guidelines. The Central Warehouse is charged with the receiving and delivering of district purchases, as well as maintaining an inventory of supplies, which may be ordered by district campuses and departments.
Legal Services General Counsel – Carrie Galatas
The Legal department provides legal advice to the Board of Trustees and Administration, develops and monitors the implementation of Board Policy, and represents the District in litigation. The department also responds on behalf of the District to complaints and grievances filed with state and federal administrative agencies, complies with requests made pursuant to the Texas Public Information Act, and manages the District’s records retention and destruction policies. The department oversees interdistrict transfers, reviews all District contracts, monitors litigation assigned to outside counsel, provides training in related areas to employees, monitors complaints filed in accordance with Board Policy, presides over expulsion hearings, and conducts investigations of violations of Board Policy.
Security Chief of Police – William Harness
The Security division is comprised solely of the Conroe ISD Police Department. The Police Department is responsible for the safety of the students and staff of the District. The department is in charge of the hiring and training of officers, patrolling of campuses, monitoring of parking lots, as well as patrolling and monitoring athletic and extracurricular events. The Police Department is also instrumental in the District’s campaign for a “Drug-Free” environment, which includes the use of the District’s K-9 unit. Along with this includes the issuing of citations for tobacco use, truancy, and other district violations.
Campuses School Principals
The Conroe Independent School District consists of five senior high schools, two high school academies, seven junior high schools (grades 7 and 8), nine intermediate schools (grades 5 and 6), three elementary/intermediate schools (grades K – 6), twenty-nine elementary schools (grades K – 4), one alternative high school, one disciplinary alternative school, and Juvenile Detention. The summer school program is also included in the campuses division. These campuses deliver instruction in regular program basic skills, bilingual and ESL programs, compensatory, remedial or tutorial programs, gifted and talented programs, special education programs, and vocational educational programs. In addition, students are offered the opportunity to participate in fine arts, athletics, and other extracurricular activities.
90
Conroe Independent School District
91
Superintendent Goals & Objectives
Dr. Don Stockton, Superintendent of Schools
GOAL 1: Student Achievement and Post Secondary Success – CISD will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare all students for
graduation and post secondary success.
Objectives: Master rigorous academic standards; close the achievement gap; and successful completion of high school.
GOAL 2: Fiscal Responsibility – CISD will maintain efficient and effective fiscal management of resources and operations to maximize learning for all students.
Objectives: Effective and efficient use of financial resources; successful implementation of capital projects; and effective and efficient operations.
GOAL 3: Recruitment, Development, and Retention of Staff – CISD will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students (NCLB Goal 3).
Objectives: Recruitment of staff; staff development; and retention of staff.
GOAL 4: Parents and Community – CISD will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through collaborative partnerships and unity of purpose.
Objectives: Parent and family involvement and community and business partnerships.
GOAL 5: Safe Schools – CISD will strive to ensure a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff (NCLB Goal 4).
Objectives: Implement safe schools plan and provide resources and training for district safety and security.
GOAL 6: Technology – CISD will provide technology infrastructure, tools, and solutions to meet the administrative requirements of the district and to maximize learning for all students.
Objectives: Maximize teaching and learning; enhance professional practices; support administration and operations; and infrastructure to support all functions.
GOAL 7: Communication – CISD will promote and enhance two-way communication among our staff and our community to maximize the success of all students.
Objectives: Effective internal communication and effective external communication.
92
Superintendent / Board2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
1.0 1.0 Administrators 361,918$ 399,014$ 419,027$ 438,028$ 36.80%
2.0 2.0 Professionals 175,002 145,225 138,228 185,088 15.55%
2.0 2.0 Paraprofessionals 84,980 96,754 75,442 79,195 6.65%
5.0 5.0 621,900 640,993 632,697 702,311 59.01%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 63,115 59,191 76,678 75,014 6.30%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
41 General Administration 333,651 841,349 528,380 412,930 34.69%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 390 500 309 - 0.00%
334,041 841,849 528,689 412,930 34.69%
Total Annual Operating Budget 1,019,056$ 1,542,033$ 1,238,064$ 1,190,255$ 100.00%
Enrollment 56,392 57,792 58,239 59,639
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 18.07$ 26.68$ 21.26$ 19.96$ -6.12%
93
Deputy Superintendent of Operations Goals & Objectives
Dr. Chris Hines, Deputy Superintendent of Operations
Transportation
GOAL: To provide safe, reliable, efficient transportation for qualified students to and from school and school related activities.
Objective 1: Continue to maintain and/or improve transportation policies: walk-to-stop policy, maintenance procedures, accident procedures & new hire procedures.
Objective 2: Maintain transportation website with up-to-date information and add Shop link.
Objective 3: Continue to follow-up on selected items in Transportation’s review.
Objective 4: Continue to utilize the CISD phone messaging system for employee notifications.
Objective 5: Continue to research and implement new and existing technologies that will improve safety and day-to-day operations.
Objective 6: Meet the department’s allotted budget and continue to research ways to effectively reduce spending.
Objective 7: Continue to improve I.P. phone answering systems and procedures.
Objective 8: Seek out grants and new funding sources that are beneficial to CISD and Transportation. Objective 9: Maintain fleet projections for all District vehicles. Objective 10: Redevelop the Safe Bus Rider Program in order to educate students in Bus Safety. Objective 11: Conduct analysis and make recommendations for Administration as needed. Objective 12: Research and make recommendations on the purchase of new and used school buses. Objective 13: Continue to improve morale and hire new employees to fill vacancies.
Custodial
GOAL 1: Maintain a minimum of 22,480 sq. feet cleaned per custodian with reduced number of staff.
GOAL 2: Maintain modified “every other day” cleaning schedule for elementary and secondary campuses.
Maintenance
GOAL 1: To maintain all schools to their optimum potential for creating a safe learning environment.
GOAL 2: To maintain a safe working environment for all maintenance craft areas.
GOAL 3: The maintenance warehouse will provide superb parts and service at the best possible cost to the taxpayers of Conroe Independent School District.
Facilities Planning and Construction
GOAL 1: To provide solutions to everyday problems that arise in the district.
GOAL 2: To prioritize project schedules that allows cost effective measures to be utilized.
GOAL 3: To implement a task force that oversees quality, work force staff, and time completion of capital improvement projects.
94
Deputy Superintendent of Operations Division2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
1.5 1.5 Administrators 187,180$ 190,252$ 195,985$ 200,461$ 0.35%
43.4 45.4 Professionals 3,512,060 3,887,931 4,258,578 4,639,450 8.04%
57.1 57.1 Paraprofessionals 1,843,885 2,005,812 2,285,570 2,312,289 4.01%
6.0 6.0 Support Personnel 174,916 184,734 183,646 191,389 0.33%
925.5 943.5 Manual Trades 26,377,058 28,563,982 28,078,702 29,164,242 50.57%
1,033.5 1,053.5 32,095,099 34,832,711 35,002,481 36,507,831 63.30%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 7,444,900 8,403,750 8,645,042 8,719,391 15.12%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 245,572 187,877 183,531 256,900 0.45%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 5,580 9,467 8,427 4,000 0.01%
21 Instructional Leadership 17,618 13,550 12,437 13,550 0.02%
34 Student Transportation 4,205,713 3,424,795 2,658,638 3,256,787 5.65%
41 General Administration 308,834 255,781 190,795 267,128 0.46%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 6,108,597 7,022,712 7,314,170 6,186,140 10.73%
53 Data Processing 2,455,267 3,083,802 2,243,029 2,461,227 4.27%
81 Facilities Acq & Construction - 819,290 747,241 - 0.00%
13,347,181 14,817,274 13,358,268 12,445,732 21.58%
Total Annual Operating Budget 52,887,180$ 58,053,735$ 57,005,791$ 57,672,954$ 100.00%
Enrollment 56,392 57,792 58,239 59,639
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 937.85$ 1,004.53$ 978.83$ 967.03$ -1.20%
95
Deputy Superintendent of Schools Goals & Objectives
Dr. Curtis Null, Deputy Superintendent of Schools
GOAL 1: Student Achievement and Post Secondary Success – CISD will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare all students for
graduation and post secondary success.
Objectives: Master rigorous academic standards; close the achievement gap; and successful completion of high school.
GOAL 2: Fiscal Responsibility – CISD will maintain efficient and effective fiscal management of resources and operations to maximize learning for all students.
Objectives: Effective and efficient use of financial resources; successful implementation of capital projects; and effective and efficient operations.
GOAL 3: Recruitment, Development, and Retention of Staff – CISD will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students (NCLB Goal 3).
Objectives: Recruitment of staff; staff development; and retention of staff.
GOAL 4: Parents and Community – CISD will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through collaborative partnerships and unity of purpose.
Objectives: Parent and family involvement and community and business partnerships.
GOAL 5: Safe Schools – CISD will strive to ensure a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff (NCLB Goal 4).
Objectives: Implement safe schools plan and provide resources and training for district safety and security.
GOAL 6: Technology – CISD will provide technology infrastructure, tools, and solutions to meet the administrative requirements of the district and to maximize learning for all students.
Objectives: Maximize teaching and learning; enhance professional practices; support administration and operations; and infrastructure to support all functions.
GOAL 7: Communication – CISD will promote and enhance two-way communication among our staff and our community to maximize the success of all students.
Objectives: Effective internal communication and effective external communication.
96
Deputy Superintendent of Schools Division2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
48.0 49.0 Professionals 4,152,911$ 5,098,804$ 4,619,883$ 4,776,822$ 25.66%
40.5 40.5 Paraprofessionals 1,307,585 1,385,053 1,438,498 2,012,651 10.81%
13.5 15.5 Counselors 868,146 867,205 827,135 882,849 4.74%
19.0 19.0 Psych/OTPT Services - Professional 1,415,571 1,603,038 1,081,985 1,444,045 7.76%
3.0 3.0 Pysch/OTPT Services - Paraprofessional 210,487 310,579 208,642 214,901 1.15%
22.8 24.8 Special Ed - Professional 2,414,273 2,611,230 1,722,187 1,921,460 10.32%
29.0 39.0 Special Ed - Paraprofessionals 554,879 765,775 659,876 679,672 3.65%
1.0 2.0 Nurses 9,125 70,000 69,878 71,974 0.39%
42.5 47.5 Teachers 1,660,873 1,927,253 1,816,189 1,935,666 10.40%
219.3 240.3 12,593,850 14,638,937 12,444,273 13,940,040 74.89%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 1,706,259 1,704,898 1,888,441 1,850,665 9.94%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 1,051,744 1,617,206 1,524,382 508,325 2.73%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 126,985 462,123 113,957 17,500 0.09%
21 Instructional Leadership 548,108 1,140,554 760,846 702,195 3.77%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 400,212 904,555 382,333 480,673 2.58%
32 Social Work Services 11,107 13,847 12,841 5,600 0.03%
33 Health Services 265,761 706,584 173,229 75,050 0.40%
36 Co-curricular Activities 409,203 497,428 397,344 171,227 0.92%
41 General Administration 375,088 643,107 399,631 153,061 0.82%
51 Plant Maint. & Operations 851,506 779,324 522,572 691,474 3.71%
61 Community Service 11,225 17,600 8,938 17,600 0.09%
81 Facilities Acquisition & Const. 5,993 - - - 0.00%
4,056,932 6,782,328 4,296,073 2,822,705 15.16%
Total Annual Operating Budget 18,357,041$ 23,126,163$ 18,628,787$ 18,613,410$ 100.00%
Enrollment 56,392 57,792 58,239 59,639
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 325.53$ 400.16$ 319.87$ 312.10$ -2.43%
97
Financial Services Goals & Objectives
Darrin Rice, Chief Financial Officer
GOAL: Conroe ISD will maintain efficient and effective fiscal management of resources and operations to maximize learning for all students.
Objective 1: Effective and Efficient Use of Financial Resources
Maintain high academicresults in a cost effective manner. Implement long-range revenue and budget plans. Maintain a fund balance of 16% to 24%. Provide essential positions needed to accommodate growth in student
population. Provide competitive compensation to attract and maintain quality personnel.
Objective 2: Successful Implementation of Capital Projects
Implement long-range master facilities plan. Continue to monitor student growth and adjust implementation timeline for
capital projects, as appropriate.
Objective 3: Effective and Efficient Operations
Continue to optimize campus allocations.
GOAL 2: Meet Performance Indicators for FIRST rating, Texas Smart Schools, ERG, and the District.
98
Financial Services2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
12.0 14.0 Professionals 1,032,962$ 1,035,923$ 1,051,951$ 1,140,918$ 14.53%
20.0 19.0 Paraprofessionals 753,210 808,134 764,025 740,628 9.43%
12.0 12.0 Support Personnel 324,927 343,315 342,280 356,929 4.55%
44.0 45.0 2,111,099 2,187,372 2,158,256 2,238,475 28.51%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 258,008 285,043 283,316 288,252 3.67%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
41 General Administration 464,576 915,666 609,431 1,022,729 13.03%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 613,001 642,392 637,130 601,677 7.66%
99 Other Intergovernmental Charges 2,760,118 3,200,000 3,082,741 3,700,000 47.13%
3,837,695 4,758,058 4,329,302 5,324,406 67.82%
Total Annual Operating Budget 6,206,802$ 7,230,473$ 6,770,874$ 7,851,133$ 100.00%
Enrollment 56,392 57,792 58,239 59,639
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 110.07$ 125.11$ 116.26$ 131.64$ 13.23%
99
Legal Services Goals & Objectives
Carrie Galatas, General Counsel
GOAL: To provide legal advice and training on legal matters affecting schools to District
staff members in order to comply with State and Federal laws and regulations thus reducing the District’s litigation exposure and in turn reducing costs associated with litigation.
100
Legal Services Division2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
1.0 1.0 Administrators 173,766$ 175,868$ 183,557$ 181,482$ 41.96%
1.5 1.5 Paraprofessionals 44,941 44,278 40,235 88,063 20.36%
2.5 2.5 218,707 220,146 223,792 269,545 62.32%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 14,599 15,671 14,052 12,595 2.91%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
41 General Administration 286,071 345,305 294,815 150,353 34.76%
286,071 345,305 294,815 150,353 34.76%
Total Annual Operating Budget 519,377$ 581,122$ 532,659$ 432,493$ 100.00%
Enrollment 56,392 57,792 58,239 59,639
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 9.21$ 10.06$ 9.15$ 7.25$ -20.71%
101
Security Goals & Objectives
William Harness, Chief of Police
GOAL: To protect the district’s students, employees, visitors, and properties. In tandem with the district’s management team, provide an orderly and safe learning environment where teachers may teach and students may have the opportunity to learn.
Objective 1: To establish and maintain effective and efficient police strategies through the deployment of its personnel and positive communication with students, parents, and campus administrators, district personnel and patrons.
Objective 2: To establish and maintain proactive measures that include prevention, intervention,
and safety strategies to students, parents, district personnel, and CISD patrons. Objective 3: To establish and maintain first responder readiness when managing crisis events
through monitoring campus safety plans, and providing site assessments, training, evaluating campus safety plans and crisis drills.
Objective 4: To establish and maintain communications with other law enforcement, emergency
medical and social agencies to enhance school and community safety while ensuring the most efficient use of district resources.
Objective 5: To establish and continue providing quality leadership and training to police
personnel that enhances officers’ skill level, whereas police personnel may be positive role models for students, as well as assist in attainment of the district’s mission of providing education while enhancing the professionalism of educational policing.
102
Security Division2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
1.0 1.0 Professionals 80,496$ 81,631$ 101,405$ 124,116$ 2.06%
1.0 1.0 Paraprofessionals 40,885 49,304 29,546 31,548 0.52%
80.0 82.0 Support Personnel 4,145,433 4,898,733 4,506,554 4,518,909 74.95%
82.0 84.0 4,266,814 5,029,668 4,637,505 4,674,573 77.53%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 779,968 842,758 848,228 855,150 14.18%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 84,855 96,000 63,441 101,834 1.69%
52 Security and Monitor Service 534,069 1,180,496 1,159,505 397,989 6.60%
618,924 1,276,496 1,222,946 499,823 8.29%
Total Annual Operating Budget 5,665,706$ 7,148,922$ 6,708,679$ 6,029,546$ 100.00%
Enrollment 56,392 57,792 58,239 59,639
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 100.47$ 123.70$ 115.19$ 101.10$ -12.23%
103
Campuses2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
182.5 186.5 Administrators 15,178,384$ 16,156,495$ 15,730,880$ 16,296,788$ 4.59%
775.4 795.4 Paraprofessionals / Aides 16,773,589 18,049,533 18,719,129 19,603,944 5.53%
148.1 149.1 Counselors 10,511,177 8,721,222 8,752,769 9,031,675 2.55%
61.0 62.0 Librarians 3,478,753 3,662,087 3,482,063 3,793,542 1.07%
59.2 59.2 Nurses 3,037,203 3,099,361 3,129,018 3,220,867 0.91%
3,316.1 3,400.1 Teachers 196,225,398 212,399,510 213,181,932 224,771,728 63.36%
4,542.3 4,652.3 245,204,504 262,088,208 262,995,791 276,718,544 78.01%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 44,180,005 48,350,456 48,994,366 50,732,718 14.30%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 6,054,093 8,522,285 6,593,603 9,052,203 2.55%
12 Instructional Resources 609,649 703,437 606,351 673,136 0.19%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 52,289 61,519 44,668 52,740 0.01%
23 School Leadership 185,771 264,225 200,280 253,507 0.07%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 170,368 665,960 307,747 103,823 0.03%
32 Social Work Services 5,869 4,000 3,997 4,000 0.00%
33 Health Services 45,802 117,629 47,589 53,650 0.02%
36 Co-curricular Activities 3,170,318 3,766,628 3,380,254 4,014,800 1.13%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 14,199,085 13,060,274 11,050,635 13,074,293 3.69%
53 Data Processing 9,265 1,998 1,406 - 0.00%
81 Facilities Acquisition & Const. 565,953 432,803 299,756 - 0.00%
25,068,462 27,600,758 22,536,286 27,282,152 7.69%
Total Annual Operating Budget 314,452,971$ 338,039,422$ 334,526,443$ 354,733,414$ 100.00%
Enrollment 56,392 57,792 58,239 59,639
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,576.20$ 5,849.24$ 5,744.03$ 5,948.01$ 3.55%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
104
Elementary / Intermediate Schools2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
97.0 101.0 Administrators 7,776,899$ 8,258,415$ 8,145,174$ 8,540,985$ 4.54%
447.0 464.5 Paraprofessionals / Aides 9,151,789 10,026,628 10,231,794 10,794,958 5.73%
60.6 60.6 Counselors 4,208,718 3,086,345 3,577,803 3,633,184 1.93%
41.0 41.0 Librarians 2,344,257 2,474,588 2,401,605 2,568,240 1.36%
41.5 41.5 Nurses 2,160,725 2,203,406 2,216,949 2,289,255 1.22%
1,826.9 1,867.4 Teachers 107,050,252 116,248,889 115,430,959 122,639,086 65.12%
2,514.0 2,576.0 132,692,640 142,298,271 142,004,284 150,465,708 79.90%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 23,701,203 26,001,484 25,924,307 26,991,616 14.33%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 2,168,306 3,519,935 2,705,568 3,675,027 1.95%
12 Instructional Resources 300,617 359,892 316,606 323,742 0.17%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 24,607 34,209 28,483 10,490 0.01%
23 School Leadership 88,448 110,429 93,694 101,106 0.05%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 88,787 192,133 87,187 38,154 0.02%
33 Health Services 32,606 85,755 35,145 37,400 0.02%
36 Co-curricular Activities 153 1,527 1,471 3,130 0.00%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 6,669,272 6,626,314 5,655,659 6,672,385 3.54%
53 Data Processing - 1,998 1,406 - 0.00%
81 Facilities Acquisition & Const. 35,124 51,148 2,500 - 0.00%
9,407,920 10,983,340 8,927,719 10,861,434 5.77%
Total Annual Operating Budget 165,801,763$ 179,283,095$ 176,856,310$ 188,318,758$ 100.00%
Enrollment 31,655 32,127 32,593 33,159
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,237.77$ 5,580.45$ 5,426.21$ 5,679.27$ 4.66%
105
Anderson Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Viviana Harris, Principal
GOAL 1: Anderson Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement Objective
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 90% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year.
Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 5 Science. 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress Objective
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted
progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 60.
Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (Hispanics and ELL) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 55.
Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
40% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas.
Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile
2. Increase Attendance Rate from 97.1% to 97.5%
3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group;
GOAL 2: Anderson Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Anderson Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Anderson Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Anderson Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
106
Anderson Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 163,999$ 178,861$ 168,108$ 172,483$ 4.04%
14.0 13.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 270,406 313,140 298,372 306,996 7.20%
1.0 1.0 Counselors 88,688 66,497 66,392 61,436 1.44%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 53,995 56,202 56,221 58,442 1.37%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 52,269 53,155 53,925 55,395 1.30%
37.3 39.3 Teachers 2,397,090 2,560,226 2,540,700 2,742,424 64.27%
56.3 57.3 3,026,447 3,228,081 3,183,718 3,397,176 79.62%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 563,774 617,742 598,565 626,457 14.68%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 66,287 88,729 75,075 100,743 2.36%
12 Instructional Resources 1,516 10,250 9,489 9,303 0.22%
23 School Leadership 5,389 2,930 2,865 4,274 0.10%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 1,481 4,739 2,363 1,175 0.03%
33 Health Services 1,164 2,630 1,099 1,100 0.03%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 112,375 116,290 109,051 126,532 2.97%
188,212 225,568 199,942 243,127 5.70%
Total Annual Operating Budget 3,778,433$ 4,071,391$ 3,982,225$ 4,266,760$ 100.00%
Enrollment 673 671 681 695
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,614.31$ 6,067.65$ 5,847.61$ 6,139.22$ 4.99%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
107
Austin Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Dr. Serena Pierson, Principal
GOAL 1: Austin Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post-secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 90% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR,STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Grade 5
Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted
progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 35. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; Eco Dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous year;
weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (Hispanic only) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 30. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post Secondary Readiness
20% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile
2. Increase Attendance Rate from 96.2% to 96.5%
3. Postsecondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group.
GOAL 2: Austin Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Austin Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Austin Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Austin Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
108
Austin Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
3.0 3.0 Administrators 238,026$ 258,138$ 244,594$ 249,800$ 4.45%
12.0 13.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 294,655 312,335 352,145 366,260 6.52%
1.0 1.0 Counselors 128,415 100,203 128,419 130,437 2.32%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 55,698 57,930 57,938 60,442 1.08%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 47,617 50,325 51,225 51,975 0.93%
56.9 60.9 Teachers 3,151,681 3,444,092 3,242,978 3,629,371 64.64%
74.9 79.9 3,916,092 4,223,023 4,077,299 4,488,285 79.93%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 729,621 809,692 778,018 827,004 14.73%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 68,935 112,067 98,246 128,417 2.29%
12 Instructional Resources 12,964 3,750 3,700 4,519 0.08%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 4,464 11,670 9,446 5,000 0.09%
23 School Leadership 1,847 8,423 8,375 7,124 0.13%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 1,529 5,243 2,123 1,675 0.03%
33 Health Services 679 1,434 599 750 0.01%
36 Co-curricular Activities 153 - - - 0.00%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 149,478 141,232 123,250 152,389 2.71%
240,049 283,819 245,739 299,874 5.34%
Total Annual Operating Budget 4,885,762$ 5,316,534$ 5,101,056$ 5,615,163$ 100.00%
Enrollment 873 889 913 945
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,596.52$ 5,980.35$ 5,587.14$ 5,941.97$ 6.35%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
109
Runyan Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Tracy Voelker, Principal
GOAL 1: Runyan Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 90% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR,STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: Reading/ELA
1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted
progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 55. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous year;
weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (Hispanic and African American) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 55. Distinctions:
Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
90% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: Post‐secondary Readiness 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile
2. Increase Attendance Rate from 97% to 98%
3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group
GOAL 2: Runyan Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop 100% highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Runyan Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Runyan Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Runyan Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
110
Runyan Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 166,599$ 181,517$ 170,949$ 174,903$ 4.03%
13.0 13.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 213,264 236,577 251,195 265,234 6.11%
1.5 1.5 Counselors 109,717 85,199 74,377 70,139 1.62%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 57,566 59,655 55,944 57,942 1.33%
1.5 1.5 Nurses 55,558 56,608 57,423 59,395 1.37%
41.6 44.1 Teachers 2,257,909 2,560,184 2,573,042 2,849,356 65.63%
60.6 63.1 2,860,613 3,179,740 3,182,930 3,476,969 80.08%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 514,866 581,519 622,016 636,063 14.65%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 68,907 90,669 78,383 90,277 2.08%
12 Instructional Resources 7,060 7,540 2,309 8,027 0.18%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 348 3,400 2,763 650 0.01%
23 School Leadership 2,705 5,350 4,378 4,512 0.10%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 2,047 6,522 2,916 1,525 0.04%
33 Health Services 1,606 3,825 1,571 1,600 0.04%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 167,892 127,585 112,476 122,081 2.81%
250,565 244,891 204,796 228,672 5.27%
Total Annual Operating Budget 3,626,044$ 4,006,150$ 4,009,742$ 4,341,704$ 100.00%
Enrollment 653 695 690 702
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,552.90$ 5,764.24$ 5,811.22$ 6,184.76$ 6.43%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
111
Sam Houston Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Christina Upshaw, Principal
GOAL 1: Sam Houston Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 90% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed;
weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 48. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (African American and Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 42. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
30% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 96.9% to 97.5% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group;
GOAL 2: Sam Houston Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Sam Houston Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Sam Houston Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Sam Houston Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
112
Sam Houston Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
3.0 3.0 Administrators 237,759$ 254,321$ 232,509$ 236,465$ 5.42%
13.2 12.2 Paraprofessionals / Aides 269,951 249,378 248,004 220,153 5.05%
0.5 0.5 Counselors 101,448 74,533 58,567 59,416 1.36%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 58,142 59,655 60,362 62,442 1.43%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 50,295 50,765 51,432 52,415 1.20%
41.9 38.9 Teachers 2,781,366 3,131,837 2,875,570 2,833,503 65.00%
60.6 56.6 3,498,961 3,820,489 3,526,444 3,464,394 79.48%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 711,383 765,671 685,209 673,751 15.46%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 49,437 98,641 84,273 96,868 2.22%
12 Instructional Resources 10,865 12,462 10,556 9,940 0.23%
13 Curriculum & Instruction - 3,070 2,412 - 0.00%
23 School Leadership 1,950 2,960 2,726 2,375 0.05%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 2,402 4,346 2,153 675 0.02%
33 Health Services 599 1,434 596 600 0.01%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 125,036 103,880 103,336 110,318 2.53%
190,289 226,793 206,052 220,776 5.06%
Total Annual Operating Budget 4,400,633$ 4,812,953$ 4,417,705$ 4,358,921$ 100.00%
Enrollment 842 867 797 740
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,226.40$ 5,551.27$ 5,542.92$ 5,890.43$ 6.27%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
113
Ben Milam Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Gilberto Lozano, Principal
GOAL 1: Milam Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 90% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed;
weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress)in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 55. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (Economically Disadvantaged and Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 45. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
90% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 96.6% to 98% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group
GOAL 2: Milam Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Milam Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Milam Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Milam Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
114
Ben Milam Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 227,960$ 178,859$ 168,033$ 170,229$ 3.72%
13.0 13.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 286,756 286,038 279,461 295,088 6.45%
1.8 1.8 Counselors 93,288 77,820 69,431 75,378 1.65%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 58,725 64,485 4,283 66,420 1.45%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 50,470 51,520 52,588 53,170 1.16%
43.8 41.8 Teachers 2,809,004 3,043,469 2,917,019 2,971,410 64.97%
62.6 60.6 3,526,203 3,702,191 3,490,815 3,631,695 79.41%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 651,549 708,327 669,261 685,176 14.98%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 66,363 84,296 70,482 98,043 2.14%
12 Instructional Resources 10,806 33,741 31,981 11,429 0.25%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 2,422 465 419 - 0.00%
23 School Leadership 2,287 1,814 1,810 3,087 0.07%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 2,162 4,815 2,160 1,075 0.02%
33 Health Services 595 1,434 552 1,200 0.03%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 250,146 156,633 141,544 141,474 3.09%
53 Data Processing - 518 518 - 0.00%
334,781 283,716 249,466 256,308 5.60%
Total Annual Operating Budget 4,512,533$ 4,694,234$ 4,409,542$ 4,573,179$ 100.00%
Enrollment 816 807 813 799
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,530.06$ 5,816.89$ 5,423.79$ 5,723.63$ 5.53%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
115
Creighton Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Jennifer Watson, Principal
GOAL 1: Creighton Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 90% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR; STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Grade 5 Science 2. Community and School Engagement (CASE): Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted
progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 90. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous year;
weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (Hispanic and White) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 90. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post-Secondary Readiness
90% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 95.9% to 97% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group
GOAL 2: Creighton Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Creighton Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Creighton Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Creighton Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
116
Creighton Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 3.0 Administrators 176,013$ 193,094$ 188,151$ 268,368$ 5.15%
15.5 15.5 Paraprofessionals / Aides 308,721 345,340 301,174 310,325 5.96%
2.2 2.2 Counselors 97,176 64,464 105,110 113,626 2.18%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 54,084 56,202 55,991 58,442 1.12%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 54,211 55,497 56,413 57,895 1.11%
53.2 56.7 Teachers 2,760,894 3,285,490 3,009,617 3,391,442 65.09%
74.9 79.4 3,451,099 4,000,087 3,716,456 4,200,098 80.62%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 663,429 763,252 735,671 775,268 14.88%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 61,297 105,139 88,293 102,135 1.96%
12 Instructional Resources 9,449 12,356 10,882 13,285 0.25%
23 School Leadership 2,184 1,643 851 2,181 0.04%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 2,406 5,491 2,531 675 0.01%
33 Health Services 600 2,869 1,197 1,800 0.03%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 72,859 111,549 101,037 114,557 2.20%
148,795 239,047 204,791 234,633 4.50%
Total Annual Operating Budget 4,263,323$ 5,002,386$ 4,656,918$ 5,209,999$ 100.00%
Enrollment 845 838 887 942
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,045.35$ 5,969.43$ 5,250.19$ 5,530.78$ 5.34%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
117
Neil A. Armstrong Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Patricia Thacker, Interim Principal
GOAL 1: Armstrong Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 90% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year.. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed;
weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 45. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 45. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
40% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 97% to 98%. 3. Postsecondary Readiness Distinction K-8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group.
GOAL 2: Armstrong Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Armstrong Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Armstrong Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Armstrong Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
118
Neil A. Armstrong Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 143,704$ 167,435$ 157,887$ 160,764$ 3.92%
16.0 16.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 286,747 301,416 299,354 293,446 7.15%
0.9 0.9 Counselors 85,245 59,767 69,159 66,292 1.62%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 57,407 59,655 59,892 62,442 1.52%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 49,647 50,325 53,051 53,995 1.32%
40.5 41.0 Teachers 2,402,510 2,492,077 2,444,343 2,637,731 64.30%
61.4 61.9 3,025,260 3,130,675 3,083,686 3,274,670 79.82%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 596,592 648,799 585,683 615,778 15.01%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 53,415 72,109 59,694 87,718 2.14%
12 Instructional Resources 3,217 3,500 3,228 3,721 0.09%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 2,070 430 430 2,000 0.05%
23 School Leadership 9,088 8,118 7,730 6,174 0.15%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 2,989 4,224 1,916 675 0.02%
33 Health Services 1,346 1,434 587 600 0.01%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 125,038 111,435 130,954 111,166 2.71%
197,163 201,250 204,539 212,054 5.17%
Total Annual Operating Budget 3,819,015$ 3,980,724$ 3,873,908$ 4,102,502$ 100.00%
Enrollment 694 715 684 683
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,502.90$ 5,567.45$ 5,663.61$ 6,006.59$ 6.06%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
119
Lamar Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Mary Jane Kirbo, Principal
GOAL 1: Lamar Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 90% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp. Ed;
weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 55. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (Hispanic and African American) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 50. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
60% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 96.6% to 98% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group.
GOAL 2: Lamar Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Lamar Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Lamar Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Lamar Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
120
Lamar Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 166,303$ 179,003$ 169,583$ 172,535$ 4.46%
12.0 12.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 202,674 217,264 214,985 221,510 5.73%
2.0 2.0 Counselors 108,642 88,007 77,849 79,007 2.04%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 63,334 66,061 65,255 68,522 1.77%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 55,884 54,102 56,284 57,895 1.50%
42.5 42.5 Teachers 2,469,969 2,529,623 2,438,391 2,472,916 63.99%
60.5 60.5 3,066,806 3,134,060 3,022,347 3,072,385 79.50%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 549,834 579,674 546,789 572,889 14.82%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 51,436 54,772 44,583 67,968 1.76%
12 Instructional Resources 4,769 5,429 4,190 4,519 0.12%
23 School Leadership 520 1,772 1,709 1,603 0.04%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 2,350 4,300 1,972 675 0.02%
33 Health Services 601 1,437 601 600 0.02%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 177,603 167,246 131,614 143,911 3.72%
237,279 234,956 184,669 219,276 5.67%
Total Annual Operating Budget 3,853,919$ 3,948,690$ 3,753,805$ 3,864,550$ 100.00%
Enrollment 713 719 701 671
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,405.22$ 5,491.92$ 5,354.93$ 5,759.39$ 7.55%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
121
Oak Ridge Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Tami Eldridge, Principal
GOAL 1: Oak Ridge Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; 90% met Level II standard 90% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed;
weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 50. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (Economically Disadvantaged and Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 60. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
90% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 96.4% to 98% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group
GOAL 2: Oak Ridge Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Oak Ridge Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Oak Ridge Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Oak Ridge Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
122
Oak Ridge Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 166,440$ 178,874$ 171,591$ 174,087$ 4.36%
10.4 12.4 Paraprofessionals / Aides 170,598 170,642 188,914 238,910 5.98%
1.5 1.5 Counselors 104,046 86,692 77,699 79,007 1.98%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 60,983 63,583 63,405 65,342 1.64%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 53,976 54,883 56,014 57,395 1.44%
32.1 39.1 Teachers 1,863,026 2,128,854 2,071,594 2,556,202 63.96%
48.0 57.0 2,419,069 2,683,528 2,629,217 3,170,943 79.35%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 434,333 488,821 475,224 537,163 13.44%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 42,666 72,835 29,306 78,247 1.96%
12 Instructional Resources 3,289 16,217 10,206 4,253 0.11%
23 School Leadership 1,587 5,619 5,612 2,820 0.07%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 1,539 4,053 1,920 675 0.02%
33 Health Services 590 1,434 595 600 0.02%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 169,245 188,842 146,164 201,561 5.04%
81 Facilities Acquisition & Const. - 35 - - 0.00%
218,916 289,035 193,803 288,156 7.21%
Total Annual Operating Budget 3,072,318$ 3,461,384$ 3,298,244$ 3,996,262$ 100.00%
Enrollment 563 584 554 690
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,457.05$ 5,927.03$ 5,953.51$ 5,791.68$ -2.72%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
123
Houser Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Angela Lozano, Principal
GOAL 1: Houser Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 85% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed;
weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 48. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (African American and Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 45. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
50% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 97% to 98% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group;
GOAL 2: Houser Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Houser Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Houser Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Houser Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
124
Houser Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
3.0 3.0 Administrators 165,147$ 195,636$ 239,812$ 243,836$ 5.23%
10.0 11.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 232,822 249,099 265,065 267,483 5.74%
1.5 1.5 Counselors 84,520 63,433 64,192 61,850 1.33%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 57,867 60,111 59,284 63,042 1.35%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 50,780 51,745 52,653 53,395 1.15%
42.6 39.6 Teachers 2,760,863 2,998,047 3,089,257 3,007,216 64.51%
59.1 57.1 3,351,999 3,618,071 3,770,263 3,696,822 79.30%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 580,998 651,753 684,924 668,340 14.34%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 53,867 68,574 55,124 85,762 1.84%
12 Instructional Resources 7,162 4,550 3,619 6,007 0.13%
23 School Leadership 1,496 3,007 2,863 4,156 0.09%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 3,461 6,859 3,121 1,775 0.04%
33 Health Services 976 2,630 953 1,100 0.02%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 232,514 198,479 76,250 197,958 4.25%
299,476 284,099 141,930 296,758 6.37%
Total Annual Operating Budget 4,232,473$ 4,553,923$ 4,597,117$ 4,661,920$ 100.00%
Enrollment 848 855 867 819
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 4,991.12$ 5,326.23$ 5,302.33$ 5,692.21$ 7.35%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
125
Ford Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Paola Gorman, Principal
GOAL 1: Ford Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 90% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted
progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 50. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (African American and Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 50. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
50% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 96.7% to 97% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group;
GOAL 2: Ford Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Ford Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Ford Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Ford Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
126
Ford Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
3.0 3.0 Administrators 201,190$ 167,528$ 236,506$ 231,601$ 4.40%
14.0 13.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 288,253 307,474 330,277 330,644 6.27%
2.0 2.0 Counselors 94,048 64,061 65,232 66,292 1.26%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 61,293 63,583 65,325 65,342 1.24%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 52,600 53,736 54,612 55,895 1.06%
50.1 44.1 Teachers 3,339,582 3,501,317 3,529,744 3,398,630 64.49%
71.1 64.1 4,036,966 4,157,699 4,281,696 4,148,404 78.72%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 732,567 794,944 794,174 775,232 14.71%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 61,203 89,718 65,810 99,787 1.89%
12 Instructional Resources 3,428 3,250 2,519 3,455 0.07%
23 School Leadership 1,633 2,275 1,501 4,601 0.09%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 3,784 7,681 3,614 675 0.01%
33 Health Services 1,745 3,347 1,320 600 0.01%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 152,707 267,018 190,246 236,850 4.49%
224,500 373,289 265,010 345,968 6.57%
Total Annual Operating Budget 4,994,033$ 5,325,932$ 5,340,880$ 5,269,604$ 100.00%
Enrollment 991 986 1,010 921
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,039.39$ 5,401.55$ 5,288.00$ 5,721.61$ 8.20%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
127
Hailey Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Tracy Horne, Principal
GOAL 1: Hailey Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 93% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed;
weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 50. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (White and Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 55. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
75% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 97% to 97.5% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group
GOAL 2: Hailey Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Hailey Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Hailey Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Hailey Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
128
Hailey Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 163,737$ 177,419$ 172,833$ 171,231$ 4.33%
8.2 8.2 Paraprofessionals / Aides 196,648 212,599 237,838 257,020 6.49%
1.0 1.0 Counselors 91,831 70,923 69,534 67,027 1.69%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 55,573 57,855 53,606 60,642 1.53%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 54,441 55,382 57,036 57,895 1.46%
39.2 39.7 Teachers 2,429,409 2,504,984 2,444,217 2,580,544 65.18%
52.4 52.9 2,991,639 3,079,162 3,035,064 3,194,359 80.69%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 515,581 544,859 528,595 557,132 14.07%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 64,724 72,731 56,519 66,778 1.69%
12 Instructional Resources 8,769 9,665 8,182 9,761 0.25%
13 Curriculum & Instruction - 591 591 - 0.00%
23 School Leadership 3,403 1,237 1,224 772 0.02%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 3,208 4,890 2,247 675 0.02%
33 Health Services 597 2,869 1,191 600 0.02%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 119,658 130,710 99,983 128,863 3.25%
200,359 222,693 169,937 207,449 5.24%
Total Annual Operating Budget 3,707,579$ 3,846,714$ 3,733,596$ 3,958,940$ 100.00%
Enrollment 720 733 722 687
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,149.42$ 5,247.90$ 5,171.19$ 5,762.65$ 11.44%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
129
B. B. Rice Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Malinda Stewart, Principal
GOAL 1: Rice Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 90% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed;
weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 56. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (African American and Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 45. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
35% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 97.0% to 97.3% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group
GOAL 2: Rice Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Rice Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Rice Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Rice Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
130
B. B. Rice Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 155,883$ 169,365$ 159,406$ 162,700$ 4.02%
5.5 4.5 Paraprofessionals / Aides 209,074 254,383 262,512 273,981 6.77%
1.0 1.0 Counselors 64,478 32,318 95,476 96,974 2.40%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 57,275 59,825 59,584 62,742 1.55%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 51,434 52,245 53,233 53,995 1.33%
37.2 35.7 Teachers 2,336,020 2,613,830 2,577,821 2,571,035 63.50%
47.7 45.2 2,874,164 3,181,966 3,208,032 3,221,427 79.56%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 532,802 595,130 605,113 622,687 15.38%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 60,164 66,277 57,691 79,324 1.96%
12 Instructional Resources 7,543 13,750 11,044 8,771 0.22%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 3,383 5,183 5,167 1,000 0.02%
23 School Leadership 1,724 9,298 3,853 2,265 0.06%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 1,917 4,374 1,994 1,404 0.03%
33 Health Services 595 1,434 600 600 0.01%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 115,213 143,698 129,924 111,484 2.75%
190,539 244,014 210,273 204,848 5.06%
Total Annual Operating Budget 3,597,505$ 4,021,110$ 4,023,418$ 4,048,962$ 100.00%
Enrollment 666 687 654 613
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,401.66$ 5,853.14$ 6,152.02$ 6,605.16$ 7.37%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
131
San Jacinto Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Renee O’Neal, Principal
GOAL 1: San Jacinto Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement Grades 3‐4; all subjects; all students; % met phase‐in
Level II standard 90% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR 3‐4,STAAR A and STAAR alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Special Ed;
weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 40. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
all subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance ( Level II and Level III) Economically disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year White and Hispanic will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 45. Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post-Secondary Readiness
40% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 94% to 96% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group
GOAL 2: San Jacinto Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: San Jacinto Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: San Jacinto Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: San Jacinto Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
132
San Jacinto Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 168,227$ 183,480$ 172,670$ 176,785$ 4.39%
13.5 13.5 Paraprofessionals / Aides 194,821 246,150 228,845 238,097 5.91%
1.0 1.0 Counselors 69,713 43,754 97,167 98,577 2.45%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 53,625 56,783 55,967 58,942 1.46%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 56,272 57,064 58,337 59,995 1.49%
41.9 39.4 Teachers 2,315,223 2,686,361 2,648,514 2,653,696 65.89%
60.4 57.9 2,857,881 3,273,592 3,261,500 3,286,092 81.60%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 454,592 514,022 529,390 527,824 13.11%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 41,560 78,390 47,889 86,222 2.14%
12 Instructional Resources 9,519 10,817 10,115 9,775 0.24%
23 School Leadership 1,118 2,200 1,170 1,425 0.04%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 2,222 4,015 1,451 675 0.02%
33 Health Services 598 1,434 599 600 0.01%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 134,788 109,238 104,145 114,557 2.84%
189,805 206,094 165,369 213,254 5.30%
Total Annual Operating Budget 3,502,278$ 3,993,708$ 3,956,259$ 4,027,170$ 100.00%
Enrollment 724 774 702 688
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 4,837.40$ 5,159.83$ 5,635.70$ 5,853.44$ 3.86%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
133
Glen Loch Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Cassie Hertzenberg, Principal
GOAL 1: Glen Loch Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 88% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Math, Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed;
weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 43. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and the lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 45. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
50% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 96.4% to 97.5% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group
GOAL 2: Glen Loch Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Glen Loch Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Glen Loch Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Glen Loch Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
134
Glen Loch Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 173,645$ 191,035$ 178,193$ 182,240$ 4.72%
16.0 17.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 206,281 235,994 213,707 246,787 6.39%
2.0 2.0 Counselors 108,706 83,831 61,678 62,668 1.62%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 53,344 55,502 50,983 57,442 1.49%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 49,851 50,765 51,432 52,415 1.36%
45.8 46.8 Teachers 2,136,406 2,269,837 2,309,367 2,531,910 65.52%
67.8 69.8 2,728,233 2,886,964 2,865,360 3,133,462 81.09%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 463,068 576,508 506,267 547,297 14.16%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 54,785 40,920 25,082 70,458 1.82%
12 Instructional Resources 7,868 8,266 6,948 7,708 0.20%
23 School Leadership 367 1,190 1,140 445 0.01%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 2,222 3,648 1,635 675 0.02%
33 Health Services 598 1,434 571 600 0.02%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 111,983 104,623 89,617 103,642 2.68%
81 Facilities Acquisition & Const. - 409 - - 0.00%
177,823 160,490 124,993 183,528 4.75%
Total Annual Operating Budget 3,369,124$ 3,623,962$ 3,496,620$ 3,864,287$ 100.00%
Enrollment 640 632 631 666
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,264.26$ 5,734.12$ 5,541.39$ 5,802.23$ 4.71%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
135
Sally K. Ride Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Megan Burnham, Principal
GOAL 1: Ride Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 95% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed;
weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 50. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (African American and Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 60. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness 90% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: Distinction Earned 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile. 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 97% to 98%. 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group.
GOAL 2: Ride Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Ride Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Ride Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Ride Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
136
Sally K. Ride Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 167,053$ 181,458$ 174,333$ 175,482$ 4.49%
9.2 9.2 Paraprofessionals / Aides 161,853 205,774 178,283 178,526 4.57%
1.5 1.5 Counselors 87,862 67,100 64,450 65,495 1.68%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 57,428 59,655 60,082 62,442 1.60%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 57,103 58,124 59,316 60,995 1.56%
35.0 38.0 Teachers 2,087,025 2,425,225 2,350,439 2,617,851 67.05%
49.7 52.7 2,618,324 2,997,336 2,886,903 3,160,791 80.96%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 490,535 558,611 541,404 571,877 14.65%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 46,580 103,770 86,534 63,151 1.62%
12 Instructional Resources 6,215 6,953 6,529 8,213 0.21%
23 School Leadership 791 740 740 3,260 0.08%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 2,426 6,057 2,783 675 0.02%
33 Health Services 1,975 4,722 1,974 750 0.02%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 107,629 99,304 90,292 95,588 2.45%
165,616 221,546 188,852 171,637 4.40%
Total Annual Operating Budget 3,274,475$ 3,777,493$ 3,617,159$ 3,904,305$ 100.00%
Enrollment 568 600 656 726
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,764.92$ 6,295.82$ 5,513.96$ 5,377.83$ -2.47%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
137
David Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Lee Allen, Principal
GOAL 1: David Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 98% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR,STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year.. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed;
weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress)in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 70. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (Hispanic and White) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 70. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
90% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile. 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 97.6% to 97.7% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group.
GOAL 2: David Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: David Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: David Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: David Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
138
David Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 169,511$ 181,037$ 175,809$ 176,049$ 5.12%
10.0 12.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 167,619 204,971 193,200 208,235 6.06%
1.0 1.0 Counselors 115,130 99,102 81,005 82,498 2.40%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 55,598 57,930 58,148 60,442 1.76%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 50,955 51,520 53,010 53,170 1.55%
36.9 35.9 Teachers 1,962,883 2,160,024 2,143,223 2,194,724 63.84%
51.9 52.9 2,521,696 2,754,584 2,704,395 2,775,118 80.73%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 433,410 482,773 467,264 477,777 13.90%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 29,830 92,051 70,807 63,583 1.85%
12 Instructional Resources 4,493 5,250 4,996 5,582 0.16%
13 Curriculum & Instruction - 985 985 - 0.00%
23 School Leadership 1,063 1,430 1,247 1,424 0.04%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 2,817 5,560 2,351 675 0.02%
33 Health Services 598 1,434 595 600 0.02%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 106,507 103,415 93,063 112,861 3.28%
145,308 210,125 174,044 184,725 5.37%
Total Annual Operating Budget 3,100,414$ 3,447,482$ 3,345,703$ 3,437,620$ 100.00%
Enrollment 626 643 629 615
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 4,952.74$ 5,361.56$ 5,319.08$ 5,589.63$ 5.09%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
139
Giesinger Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Melissa Hammond, Principal
GOAL 1: Giesinger Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 97% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed;
weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 61. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (Economically Disadvantaged and White) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 65. Distinctions:
Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
70% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 96.4 % to 97%
3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group;
GOAL 2: Giesinger Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Giesinger Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Giesinger Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Giesinger Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
140
Giesinger Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 186,832$ 182,486$ 162,906$ 166,178$ 5.01%
8.0 8.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 167,350 188,477 170,164 168,798 5.09%
1.0 1.0 Counselors 59,316 40,994 61,617 64,178 1.93%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 59,940 62,685 62,228 65,214 1.96%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 49,164 50,325 51,112 51,975 1.57%
28.2 31.7 Teachers 1,835,713 1,971,974 1,888,880 2,131,772 64.22%
41.2 44.7 2,358,315 2,496,941 2,396,907 2,648,115 79.78%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 442,083 480,832 445,837 476,496 14.35%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 49,751 76,532 54,918 60,146 1.81%
12 Instructional Resources 6,994 7,507 7,043 8,213 0.25%
23 School Leadership 5,132 1,372 1,297 1,616 0.05%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 1,802 4,069 1,974 675 0.02%
33 Health Services 577 1,434 592 600 0.02%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 109,188 120,316 95,579 123,565 3.72%
173,444 211,230 161,403 194,815 5.87%
Total Annual Operating Budget 2,973,842$ 3,189,003$ 3,004,147$ 3,319,426$ 100.00%
Enrollment 509 542 541 575
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,842.52$ 5,883.77$ 5,552.95$ 5,772.91$ 3.96%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
141
Galatas Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Denae Wilker, Principal
GOAL 1: Galatas Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 100% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted
progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 70. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (Hispanic and White) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 70. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
100% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 97.4% to 97.6% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group
GOAL 2: Galatas Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Galatas Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Galatas Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Galatas Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
142
Galatas Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 163,990$ 177,265$ 168,878$ 171,741$ 4.49%
10.0 11.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 228,535 246,969 238,060 250,733 6.55%
2.1 2.1 Counselors 101,524 83,378 65,232 66,292 1.73%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 57,767 60,111 60,094 63,042 1.65%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 56,030 56,219 57,366 58,895 1.54%
44.0 44.0 Teachers 2,254,477 2,282,327 2,374,845 2,492,588 65.16%
60.1 61.1 2,862,323 2,906,269 2,964,475 3,103,291 81.13%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 477,503 503,048 506,997 529,942 13.85%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 32,820 67,001 34,706 70,716 1.85%
12 Instructional Resources 9,214 13,023 6,850 6,669 0.17%
13 Curriculum & Instruction - 946 944 - 0.00%
23 School Leadership 323 2,286 2,235 1,838 0.05%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 3,734 6,340 2,823 675 0.02%
33 Health Services 599 1,434 595 600 0.02%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 94,637 107,165 90,941 111,484 2.91%
141,327 198,195 139,094 191,982 5.02%
Total Annual Operating Budget 3,481,153$ 3,607,512$ 3,610,566$ 3,825,215$ 100.00%
Enrollment 660 619 669 671
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,274.47$ 5,827.97$ 5,396.96$ 5,700.77$ 5.63%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
143
Barbara Bush Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Judy Mills, Principal
GOAL 1: Bush Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 100 % of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year.. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Grade
5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted
progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 60. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (Hispanicand White) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 60. Distinctions:
Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
100% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 97.3% to 98%
3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group
GOAL 2: Bush Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Bush Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Bush Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Bush Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
144
Barbara Bush Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 172,741$ 182,434$ 172,355$ 176,425$ 4.29%
15.5 15.5 Paraprofessionals / Aides 194,168 248,657 183,695 235,694 5.73%
2.3 2.3 Counselors 63,588 39,427 65,952 67,027 1.63%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 54,931 57,505 57,043 59,942 1.46%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 51,498 51,945 53,342 53,695 1.30%
51.3 51.3 Teachers 2,377,306 2,465,356 2,602,917 2,764,855 67.19%
73.1 73.1 2,914,232 3,045,324 3,135,304 3,357,638 81.60%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 485,068 520,676 530,647 563,373 13.69%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 17,710 50,404 40,832 64,070 1.56%
12 Instructional Resources 9,438 8,934 8,684 9,858 0.24%
23 School Leadership 850 900 900 1,187 0.03%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 3,600 6,241 3,074 1,275 0.03%
33 Health Services 1,200 2,869 1,199 1,600 0.04%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 193,320 149,977 136,442 115,829 2.81%
81 Facilities Acquisition & Const. - 14 - - 0.00%
226,118 219,339 191,131 193,819 4.71%
Total Annual Operating Budget 3,625,418$ 3,785,339$ 3,857,082$ 4,114,830$ 100.00%
Enrollment 698 668 724 694
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,194.01$ 5,666.68$ 5,327.46$ 5,929.15$ 11.29%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
145
Colin L. Powell Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Lisa Garrison, Principal
GOAL 1: Powell Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement:
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 99% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR , STAAR A, and STAAR ALTERNATE; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Grade 5 Science. 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed;
weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities, and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math; earning an index 2 score of 70%. Distinctions: Will continue to meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading and Math
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the
previous year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (White) will meet the weighted performance Level II and Level III, earning and Index 3 score of 70%. Distinctions: Will continue to meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness 90% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final Level II standard on two or more test combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in the top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 97.2% to 98%. 3. Will continue to meet Postsecondary Readiness Distinction K-8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group.
GOAL 2: Powell Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Powell Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Powell Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Powell Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
146
Colin L. Powell Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 174,627$ 182,815$ 172,069$ 175,530$ 4.16%
12.5 12.5 Paraprofessionals / Aides 187,746 200,589 203,432 215,433 5.11%
1.5 1.5 Counselors 70,189 43,531 74,621 73,793 1.75%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 55,588 57,930 57,948 60,442 1.43%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 56,805 57,629 54,501 51,700 1.23%
38.2 39.2 Teachers 2,648,187 2,835,791 2,709,587 2,843,485 67.46%
56.2 57.2 3,193,142 3,378,285 3,272,158 3,420,383 81.15%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 559,567 598,492 585,864 607,187 14.40%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 40,264 60,206 50,219 69,118 1.64%
12 Instructional Resources 5,870 5,252 4,999 4,519 0.11%
23 School Leadership 2,002 3,582 3,569 2,850 0.07%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 3,461 5,872 2,555 675 0.02%
33 Health Services 594 1,442 575 600 0.01%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 95,421 111,953 86,467 109,788 2.60%
147,612 188,307 148,384 187,550 4.45%
Total Annual Operating Budget 3,900,321$ 4,165,084$ 4,006,406$ 4,215,120$ 100.00%
Enrollment 807 760 772 741
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 4,833.11$ 5,480.37$ 5,189.65$ 5,688.42$ 9.61%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
147
Buckalew Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Jill Price, Principal
GOAL 1: Buckalew Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 100% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted
progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 65. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (Hispanic and White) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 80. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
100% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile. 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 96.8% to 97.2% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group.
GOAL 2: Buckalew Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Buckalew Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Buckalew Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Buckalew Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
148
Buckalew Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 170,280$ 183,448$ 173,642$ 178,224$ 4.67%
10.2 11.2 Paraprofessionals / Aides 189,180 195,559 234,816 252,917 6.63%
1.5 1.5 Counselors 77,944 54,221 107,874 110,248 2.89%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 52,868 54,992 58,193 60,442 1.59%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 57,621 58,124 59,724 60,995 1.60%
41.2 40.2 Teachers 2,291,713 2,293,059 2,343,355 2,399,063 62.92%
56.9 56.9 2,839,606 2,839,403 2,977,604 3,061,889 80.30%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 457,176 474,074 509,708 531,867 13.95%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 37,393 63,250 48,341 69,968 1.84%
12 Instructional Resources 5,700 5,313 5,050 5,050 0.13%
23 School Leadership 1,390 1,394 1,390 1,650 0.04%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 3,018 5,469 2,727 675 0.02%
33 Health Services 599 1,434 600 600 0.02%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 130,217 150,285 115,517 141,156 3.70%
81 Facilities Acquisition & Const. 29,310 - - - 0.00%
207,627 227,145 173,625 219,099 5.75%
Total Annual Operating Budget 3,504,409$ 3,540,622$ 3,660,937$ 3,812,855$ 100.00%
Enrollment 698 645 673 660
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,020.64$ 5,489.34$ 5,439.73$ 5,777.05$ 6.20%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
149
O. A. Reaves Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Nicole Walker, Principal
GOAL 1: Reaves Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 90% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed;
weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress)in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 60. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (African American and Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 50. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
90% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 96.5% to 98% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group
GOAL 2: Reaves Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Reaves Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Reaves Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Reaves Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
150
O.A. Reaves Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 162,775$ 177,527$ 167,384$ 171,231$ 4.23%
8.0 7.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 205,177 217,741 194,167 185,835 4.59%
1.0 1.0 Counselors 66,115 41,608 68,492 69,617 1.72%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 64,889 66,872 67,189 69,298 1.71%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 54,148 54,883 56,552 57,395 1.42%
33.2 35.2 Teachers 2,405,840 2,496,676 2,426,991 2,639,076 65.21%
46.2 47.2 2,958,944 3,055,307 2,980,775 3,192,452 78.88%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 549,638 603,785 584,994 608,120 15.03%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 52,497 92,053 71,597 95,746 2.37%
12 Instructional Resources 4,852 6,250 5,991 6,645 0.16%
23 School Leadership 1,331 1,489 1,489 1,484 0.04%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 1,774 4,707 2,153 675 0.02%
33 Health Services 590 1,434 590 600 0.01%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 152,774 155,816 152,643 141,262 3.49%
213,818 261,749 234,463 246,412 6.09%
Total Annual Operating Budget 3,722,400$ 3,920,841$ 3,800,232$ 4,046,984$ 100.00%
Enrollment 685 705 716 721
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,434.16$ 5,561.48$ 5,307.59$ 5,613.02$ 5.75%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
151
George C. Kaufman III Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Tina Oliver, Principal
GOAL 1: Kaufman Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 95 % of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed;
weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 55. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; Eco. Dis. and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the
previous year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year. (Per the TEA Accountability Manual, any campus with only 2 student groups will only count Economically Disadvantaged and the lowest performing group, which is Hispanic). These groups will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 55. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
90% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 97.2% to 97.5% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group
GOAL 2: Kaufman Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Kaufman Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Kaufman Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Kaufman Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
152
George C. Kaufman III Elementary2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
3.0 3.0 Administrators 237,097$ 254,813$ 244,269$ 248,969$ 5.33%
7.5 9.5 Paraprofessionals / Aides 199,952 214,166 272,740 264,419 5.67%
1.0 1.0 Counselors 70,175 41,724 72,572 73,778 1.58%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 57,168 59,655 59,362 62,442 1.34%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 59,101 60,536 61,316 62,295 1.33%
48.0 48.0 Teachers 2,894,143 2,947,867 2,913,679 2,997,419 64.23%
61.5 63.5 3,517,636 3,578,761 3,623,938 3,709,322 79.48%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 612,159 651,122 652,307 662,549 14.20%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 47,932 66,073 53,773 88,497 1.90%
12 Instructional Resources 8,384 8,250 7,876 8,240 0.18%
23 School Leadership 4,120 323 323 1,009 0.02%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 2,830 6,342 2,865 675 0.01%
33 Health Services 597 1,913 744 800 0.02%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 194,782 193,081 166,329 195,732 4.19%
258,645 275,982 231,910 294,953 6.32%
Total Annual Operating Budget 4,388,440$ 4,505,865$ 4,508,155$ 4,666,824$ 100.00%
Enrollment 864 859 832 817
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,079.21$ 5,245.48$ 5,418.46$ 5,712.15$ 5.42%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
153
Bonnie Wilkinson Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Victor Uher, Principal
GOAL 1: Wilkinson Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 95% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed;
weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 50. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (Hispanic and African American) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 53. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
90% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 96.7% to 97.5% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group
GOAL 2: Wilkinson Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Wilkinson Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Wilkinson Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Wilkinson Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
154
Bonnie Wilkinson Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 168,776$ 181,100$ 173,137$ 177,216$ 4.69%
5.0 6.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 139,470 152,864 165,074 186,149 4.92%
1.0 1.0 Counselors 64,616 40,796 63,389 63,296 1.67%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 57,877 60,111 60,944 63,042 1.67%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 49,857 52,245 52,370 53,995 1.43%
27.0 31.0 Teachers 2,014,567 1,933,579 2,140,896 2,448,788 64.79%
37.0 42.0 2,495,163 2,420,695 2,655,810 2,992,486 79.17%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 449,129 461,104 496,365 541,370 14.32%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 30,671 53,985 38,597 71,458 1.89%
12 Instructional Resources 4,561 5,250 4,551 6,645 0.18%
23 School Leadership 1,834 2,550 2,546 1,187 0.03%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 2,095 4,274 2,063 675 0.02%
33 Health Services 601 1,434 599 600 0.02%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 173,215 153,092 162,489 165,318 4.37%
81 Facilities Acquisition & Const. - 44,000 2,500 - 0.00%
212,977 264,585 213,345 245,883 6.51%
Total Annual Operating Budget 3,157,269$ 3,146,384$ 3,365,520$ 3,779,739$ 100.00%
Enrollment 613 599 620 712
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,150.52$ 5,252.73$ 5,428.26$ 5,308.62$ -2.20%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
155
Sue Park Broadway Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Nikki Conley, Principal
GOAL 1: Broadway Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 95% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year.. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed;
weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 52. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 50. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
90% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 97.2% to 98% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group
GOAL 2: Broadway Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Broadway Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Broadway Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Broadway Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
156
Sue Park Broadway Elementary2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
3.0 3.0 Administrators 239,394$ 258,522$ 255,319$ 250,553$ 4.37%
8.0 8.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 261,050 308,480 286,134 295,341 5.15%
1.0 1.0 Counselors 116,760 88,761 76,020 77,294 1.35%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 54,324 56,202 56,321 58,442 1.02%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 49,682 50,325 51,068 51,975 0.91%
38.5 43.5 Teachers 3,110,319 3,410,043 3,448,066 3,844,020 66.98%
52.5 57.5 3,831,529 4,172,333 4,172,928 4,577,625 79.77%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 677,432 741,505 749,492 808,611 14.09%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 40,055 168,708 140,311 108,283 1.89%
12 Instructional Resources 5,960 7,033 6,750 6,645 0.12%
23 School Leadership 1,383 623 373 1,781 0.03%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 3,847 8,263 3,998 1,675 0.03%
33 Health Services 1,957 5,083 2,123 3,100 0.05%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 201,827 250,783 197,623 231,127 4.03%
53 Data Processing - 518 518 - 0.00%
255,029 441,011 351,696 352,611 6.14%
Total Annual Operating Budget 4,763,990$ 5,354,849$ 5,274,116$ 5,738,847$ 100.00%
Enrollment 974 1,055 1,060 1,162
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 4,891.16$ 5,075.69$ 4,975.58$ 4,938.77$ -0.74%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
157
Charlie Patterson Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives Julie Miller, Principal
GOAL 1: Patterson Elementary School will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement Grades 3‐4; all subjects; all students; 83% met phase‐in Level II standard
90% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet phase‐in Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR , STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL. Index 2: Student Progress Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp. Ed; weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities, and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math earning an index 2 score of 55. 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math. Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (phase‐in Level II and III) Economically Disadvantaged students and the 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous year (White and Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance phase‐in Level Ii and III, earning an Index 3 score of 53. Will meet Top 25% Closing performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math INDEX 4: POST‐SECONDARY READINESS 90% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on one or more test combined over all subjects. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Establish Attendance Rate from 98% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group
GOAL 2: Patterson Elementary School will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize
learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Patterson Elementary School will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Patterson Elementary School will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Patterson Elementary School will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
158
Charlie Patterson Elementary2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 166,195$ 180,977$ 174,291$ 174,277$ 4.13%
8.0 8.5 Paraprofessionals / Aides 188,540 219,810 222,221 264,130 6.25%
1.0 1.0 Counselors 89,233 67,409 63,798 61,850 1.46%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 54,179 56,202 56,326 58,442 1.38%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 52,708 53,736 54,943 55,895 1.32%
41.0 42.0 Teachers 2,249,742 2,614,761 2,558,197 2,705,679 64.06%
54.0 55.5 2,800,597 3,192,895 3,129,776 3,320,273 78.61%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 522,604 582,645 589,291 615,578 14.57%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 50,679 74,476 63,676 102,638 2.43%
12 Instructional Resources 6,147 1,250 995 1,329 0.03%
23 School Leadership 2,699 1,989 1,971 2,496 0.06%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 1,974 4,691 2,260 1,125 0.03%
33 Health Services 601 2,391 985 1,600 0.04%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 91,477 167,424 75,706 178,883 4.23%
153,577 252,221 145,593 288,071 6.82%
Total Annual Operating Budget 3,476,778$ 4,027,761$ 3,864,660$ 4,223,922$ 100.00%
Enrollment 686 726 747 774
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,068.19$ 5,547.88$ 5,173.57$ 5,457.26$ 100.00%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
159
Birnham Woods Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Dr. Christine Butler, Principal
GOAL 1: Birnham Woods Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement Grades 3‐8; all subjects; all students; % met phase‐in
Level II standard
95% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet phase‐in Level II performance standard in STAAR 3‐4; STAAR 3‐4 Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, and
Math. 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed;
weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 45. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (White and African American) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 60. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
55% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile. 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 96.8% to 97.3% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group.
GOAL 2: Birnham Woods Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Birnham Woods Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Birnham Woods Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Birnham Woods Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
160
Birnham Woods Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 220,713$ 255,505$ 248,604$ 248,111$ 4.57%
7.5 7.5 Paraprofessionals / Aides 236,133 280,474 259,003 263,381 4.86%
1.0 1.0 Counselors 120,097 28,590 62,814 64,178 1.18%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 62,377 64,485 65,262 67,014 1.24%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 51,947 52,245 52,489 53,995 1.00%
49.5 52.5 Teachers 2,902,893 3,367,740 3,440,686 3,664,351 67.56%
62.0 65.0 3,594,160 4,049,039 4,128,858 4,361,030 80.41%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 606,262 679,515 712,217 754,250 13.91%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 47,533 82,065 71,737 106,076 1.96%
12 Instructional Resources 9,549 11,356 11,095 13,874 0.26%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 4,212 2,985 985 - 0.00%
23 School Leadership 560 1,468 925 2,756 0.05%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 3,174 6,358 3,170 675 0.01%
33 Health Services 899 1,674 700 1,100 0.02%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 162,124 170,246 146,453 183,757 3.39%
228,051 276,152 235,065 308,238 5.68%
Total Annual Operating Budget 4,428,473$ 5,004,706$ 5,076,140$ 5,423,518$ 100.00%
Enrollment 940 1,042 1,045 1,154
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 4,711.14$ 4,802.98$ 4,857.55$ 4,699.76$ -3.25%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
161
Jean Stewart Elementary K-6 Campus Goals & Objectives
Carrie Fitzpatrick, Principal
GOAL 1: Stewart Elementary School will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close achievement gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 93% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted
progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 45.. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math
2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and lowest performing racial/ethnic group from the prior year (Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an index 3 score of 47.. Will meet Top 25% Closing Achievement Gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
90% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Establish Attendance Rate of = 95%
3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐6: Performance in top 25% of comparison group
GOAL 2: Stewart Elementary School will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Stewart Elementary School will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Stewart Elementary School will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Stewart Elementary School will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
162
Jean E. Stewart K-6 School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 167,920$ 180,901$ 183,600$ 175,909$ 3.76%
5.0 7.5 Paraprofessionals / Aides 172,362 176,114 201,984 255,283 5.45%
2.0 2.0 Counselors 83,743 59,394 89,027 91,538 1.95%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 54,455 56,386 57,000 58,545 1.25%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 55,110 56,219 57,194 58,895 1.26%
36.0 45.0 Teachers 1,850,279 2,259,080 2,458,639 3,102,185 66.23%
47.0 58.5 2,383,869 2,788,094 3,047,444 3,742,355 79.89%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 440,702 505,354 590,554 667,849 14.26%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 76,932 66,064 59,465 91,864 1.96%
12 Instructional Resources 2,216 2,750 2,721 532 0.01%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 626 1,026 1,025 1,000 0.02%
23 School Leadership 5,019 2,008 1,984 2,493 0.05%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 1,761 3,600 1,786 675 0.01%
33 Health Services 580 2,510 1,049 600 0.01%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 159,643 167,981 141,569 176,763 3.77%
246,777 245,939 209,599 273,927 5.85%
Total Annual Operating Budget 3,071,348$ 3,539,387$ 3,847,597$ 4,684,131$ 100.00%
Enrollment 423 512 601 811
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 7,260.87$ 6,912.87$ 6,401.99$ 5,775.75$ 100.00%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
163
Ann K. Snyder Elementary Campus Goals & Objectives
Lindsay Ardoin, Principal
GOAL 1: Snyder Elementary will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 95% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed;
weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 60. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (White and Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 60. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post-Secondary Readiness
90% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 97.1% to 97.5% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group;
GOAL 2: Snyder Elementary will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Snyder Elementary will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Snyder Elementary will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Snyder Elementary will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
164
Ann Snyder Elementary School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
3.0 3.0 Administrators 166,926$ 194,209$ 237,778$ 241,556$ 4.64%
11.5 14.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 212,448 218,782 268,932 293,099 5.63%
1.0 1.0 Counselors 96,069 67,268 109,994 111,726 2.14%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 57,622 60,130 60,384 63,061 1.21%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 49,916 50,765 52,150 52,415 1.01%
48.5 53.5 Teachers 2,729,631 3,012,915 3,192,544 3,423,113 65.70%
66.0 73.5 3,312,612 3,604,069 3,921,782 4,184,970 80.32%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 578,920 613,517 682,488 717,065 13.76%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 48,573 68,749 59,432 108,166 2.08%
12 Instructional Resources 5,458 8,789 8,532 8,771 0.17%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 864 - - - 0.00%
23 School Leadership 3,198 400 373 451 0.01%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 1,930 8,644 4,302 675 0.01%
33 Health Services 604 1,434 600 600 0.01%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 175,149 206,783 121,029 189,798 3.64%
235,776 294,799 194,268 308,461 5.92%
Total Annual Operating Budget 4,127,308$ 4,512,385$ 4,798,538$ 5,210,496$ 100.00%
Enrollment 862 929 956 1,028
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 4,788.06$ 4,857.25$ 5,019.39$ 5,068.58$ 0.98%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
165
Coulson Tough K-6 Campus Goals & Objectives
Shawn Creswell, Principal
GOAL 1: Coulson Tough K-6 School will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close achievement gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 100% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR,STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted
progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 60. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (White and Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 72. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Achievement Gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
100% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile
2. Increase Attendance Rate from 97% to 98%
3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group;
GOAL 2: Coulson Tough K-6 School will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Coulson Tough K-6 School will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Coulson Tough K-6 School will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Coulson Tough K-6 School will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
166
Coulson Tough K-6 School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
4.0 4.0 Administrators 249,744$ 264,645$ 262,231$ 256,005$ 4.48%
12.5 14.5 Paraprofessionals / Aides 253,748 262,879 284,728 337,526 5.91%
1.0 1.0 Counselors 131,809 88,807 162,566 167,341 2.93%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 60,820 62,611 61,805 64,542 1.13%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 58,838 58,578 61,357 61,495 1.08%
53.0 50.0 Teachers 3,589,914 3,702,606 3,638,491 3,664,644 64.15%
72.5 71.5 4,344,873 4,440,126 4,471,178 4,551,553 79.68%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 730,564 745,011 759,829 782,376 13.70%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 11,284 136,750 112,712 103,533 1.81%
12 Instructional Resources 9,361 7,500 6,919 5,847 0.10%
23 School Leadership 53 2,600 373 3,087 0.05%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 2,997 5,892 2,816 1,925 0.03%
33 Health Services 600 2,938 1,229 1,600 0.03%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 242,812 263,353 215,337 262,707 4.60%
81 Facilities Acquisition & Const. 5,814 190 - - 0.00%
272,921 419,223 339,386 378,699 6.63%
Total Annual Operating Budget 5,348,358$ 5,604,360$ 5,570,393$ 5,712,628$ 100.00%
Enrollment 1,011 928 1,008 925
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,290.17$ 6,039.18$ 5,526.18$ 6,175.81$ 11.76%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
167
Joel Deretchin K-6 Campus Goals & Objectives
Alicia Reeves, Principal
GOAL 1: Deretchin K-6 School will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 100% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR,STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Grade 5
Science
2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted
progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an index 2 score of 66. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous year;
weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (Hispanic and White) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 70. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
100% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile
2. Increase Attendance Rate from 97.5% to 98.0%
3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group
GOAL 2: Deretchin K-6 School will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Deretchin K-6 School will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Deretchin K-6 School will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Deretchin K-6 School will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
168
Joel Deretchin K-6 School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
4.0 4.0 Administrators 239,176$ 259,352$ 243,858$ 249,873$ 4.45%
10.0 12.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 220,935 219,932 252,595 291,169 5.19%
2.0 2.0 Counselors 124,867 86,759 162,023 166,920 2.97%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 69,179 69,912 71,668 73,188 1.30%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 52,999 53,155 55,755 55,395 0.99%
48.3 44.3 Teachers 3,772,045 3,948,039 3,798,011 3,711,701 66.10%
66.3 64.3 4,479,201 4,637,149 4,583,910 4,548,246 81.00%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 772,271 820,142 791,604 777,083 13.84%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 71,541 87,502 63,536 97,862 1.74%
12 Instructional Resources 7,306 7,000 6,493 6,379 0.11%
23 School Leadership 4,415 4,731 3,893 5,076 0.09%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 3,541 5,696 2,479 900 0.02%
33 Health Services 1,197 1,434 595 600 0.01%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 198,849 164,716 168,118 178,883 3.19%
81 Facilities Acquisition & Const. - 6,500 - - 0.00%
286,849 277,579 245,114 289,700 5.16%
Total Annual Operating Budget 5,538,321$ 5,734,870$ 5,620,628$ 5,615,029$ 100.00%
Enrollment 1,121 1,035 1,067 988
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 4,940.52$ 5,540.94$ 5,267.69$ 5,683.23$ 7.89%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
169
Wilkerson Intermediate Campus Goals & Objectives
J. J. Daw, Principal
GOAL 1: Wilkerson Intermediate will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 94% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Grade
5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted
progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 50. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (African American and Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 50. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
90% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 96.8% to 98% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group
GOAL 2: Wilkerson Intermediate will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Wilkerson Intermediate will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Wilkerson Intermediate will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Wilkerson Intermediate will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
170
Wilkerson Intermediate School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 172,736$ 188,398$ 177,985$ 181,185$ 4.07%
12.5 12.5 Paraprofessionals / Aides 266,674 279,691 266,562 277,580 6.23%
1.0 1.0 Counselors 78,438 36,952 66,358 67,441 1.51%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 55,688 57,930 57,908 60,442 1.36%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 55,120 55,829 52,447 58,395 1.31%
51.4 53.4 Teachers 2,583,617 2,763,699 2,644,537 2,935,967 65.91%
68.9 70.9 3,212,273 3,382,499 3,265,797 3,581,010 80.39%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 566,931 626,532 611,370 653,881 14.68%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 49,199 72,795 57,089 82,709 1.86%
12 Instructional Resources 7,918 8,500 7,975 8,505 0.19%
13 Curriculum & Instruction - 70 70 - 0.00%
23 School Leadership 21 1,585 1,585 1,187 0.03%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 503 1,045 175 675 0.02%
33 Health Services 592 1,408 589 600 0.01%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 169,731 121,807 113,680 125,896 2.83%
227,964 207,210 181,163 219,572 4.93%
Total Annual Operating Budget 4,007,168$ 4,216,241$ 4,058,330$ 4,454,463$ 100.00%
Enrollment 702 688 683 698
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,708.22$ 6,128.26$ 5,941.92$ 6,381.75$ 7.40%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
171
Collins Intermediate Campus Goals & Objectives
Shelli LeBlanc, Principal
GOAL 1: Collins Intermediate will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close achievement gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 100% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Grade 5 Science. 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted
progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress)in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 60. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous year;
weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year White and Hispanic will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 70. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Achievement Gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
80% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 97.4% to 97.8% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group
GOAL 2: Collins Intermediate will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Collins Intermediate will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Collins Intermediate will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Collins Intermediate will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
172
Collins Intermediate School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 172,074$ 185,894$ 177,153$ 180,933$ 4.89%
6.0 6.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 146,464 175,673 211,108 237,972 6.43%
1.0 1.0 Counselors 101,376 82,817 76,751 80,022 2.16%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 28,567 61,691 60,472 63,542 1.72%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 51,268 51,945 52,982 53,695 1.45%
42.7 44.7 Teachers 2,072,397 2,250,029 2,178,448 2,401,851 64.87%
53.7 55.7 2,572,146 2,808,049 2,756,914 3,018,015 81.52%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 426,520 475,340 465,032 492,275 13.30%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 44,349 70,501 51,773 71,153 1.92%
12 Instructional Resources 8,285 9,084 8,452 10,359 0.28%
13 Curriculum & Instruction - 70 70 - 0.00%
23 School Leadership 3,292 4,509 2,675 594 0.02%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 409 1,482 452 675 0.02%
33 Health Services 597 1,434 506 600 0.02%
36 Co-curricular Activities - 40 - - 0.00%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 103,907 96,944 95,251 108,622 2.93%
53 Data Processing - 592 - - 0.00%
160,839 184,656 159,179 192,003 5.19%
Total Annual Operating Budget 3,159,505$ 3,468,045$ 3,381,125$ 3,702,293$ 100.00%
Enrollment 674 657 697 711
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 4,687.69$ 5,278.61$ 4,850.97$ 5,207.16$ 7.34%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
173
Mitchell Intermediate Campus Goals & Objectives
Paula Klapesky, Principal
GOAL 1: Mitchell Intermediate will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement Grades 3‐8; all subjects; all students; % met phase‐in Level
I standard
100% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet phase‐in Level I performance standard in STAAR; STAAR A and Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Grade 5 Science. 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress Grades 3‐8; Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7
racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities, and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math earning an Index 2 score of 55. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD Indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps All subjects; Economically Disadvantaged and 2
lowest performing racial/ethnic groups (Hispanic and Two or More Races) from the
previous year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous year (Hispanic and Two or More Races) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 66. 1. Will meet Top 25% Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness 100% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on one or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile. 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 97.4% to 98%. 3. Post-secondary Readiness Distinction K-8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group;
Grade 3-12.
GOAL 2: Mitchell Intermediate will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Mitchell Intermediate will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Mitchell Intermediate will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Mitchell Intermediate will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
174
Mitchell Intermediate School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
3.0 4.0 Administrators 249,687$ 268,753$ 261,244$ 343,427$ 5.40%
18.9 18.9 Paraprofessionals / Aides 257,991 281,664 358,405 359,676 5.66%
3.0 3.0 Counselors 164,421 105,760 148,041 150,511 2.37%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 62,355 65,734 65,157 68,263 1.07%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 46,481 51,145 53,400 53,500 0.84%
66.6 67.6 Teachers 3,762,656 4,083,388 3,946,994 4,144,682 65.20%
93.5 95.5 4,543,591 4,856,444 4,833,241 5,120,059 80.55%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 802,851 871,479 882,324 918,621 14.45%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 72,424 95,320 62,673 113,163 1.78%
12 Instructional Resources 7,996 8,500 8,000 9,037 0.14%
13 Curriculum & Instruction - 70 70 - 0.00%
23 School Leadership 458 500 500 594 0.01%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 1,870 5,349 1,888 2,350 0.04%
33 Health Services 597 6,216 2,482 3,100 0.05%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 191,579 189,912 170,892 189,586 2.98%
274,924 305,867 246,505 317,830 5.00%
Total Annual Operating Budget 5,621,366$ 6,033,790$ 5,962,070$ 6,356,510$ 100.00%
Enrollment 1,208 1,200 1,244 1,222
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 4,653.45$ 5,028.16$ 4,792.66$ 5,201.73$ 8.54%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
175
Grangerland Intermediate Campus Goals & Objectives
Karen Jones, Principal
GOAL 1: Grangerland Intermediate will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; 83% met Level II standard 88% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted
progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 38. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (Hispanic and White) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 44. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post-Secondary Readiness
90% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 95.7% to 97% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group;
GOAL 2: Grangerland Intermediate will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Grangerland Intermediate will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Grangerland Intermediate provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Grangerland Intermediate will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
176
Grangerland Intermediate School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
3.0 3.0 Administrators 245,941$ 267,933$ 253,262$ 258,599$ 4.26%
10.5 10.5 Paraprofessionals / Aides 284,870 306,374 304,207 321,613 5.29%
2.0 2.0 Counselors 200,614 180,323 139,907 142,662 2.35%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 60,098 62,611 63,185 64,942 1.07%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 54,129 54,458 55,044 56,895 0.94%
59.5 58.5 Teachers 3,327,517 3,655,322 3,698,450 3,806,391 62.65%
77.0 76.0 4,173,169 4,527,021 4,514,055 4,651,102 76.55%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 784,089 881,534 899,863 923,549 15.20%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 68,931 132,529 105,271 119,757 1.97%
12 Instructional Resources 12,453 12,995 12,705 14,892 0.25%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 1,658 70 70 - 0.00%
23 School Leadership 770 3,201 3,193 2,691 0.04%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 786 2,154 1,074 925 0.02%
33 Health Services 596 1,434 600 600 0.01%
36 Co-curricular Activities - 385 385 1,953 0.03%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 355,323 329,275 334,472 360,203 5.93%
440,517 482,043 457,770 501,021 8.25%
Total Annual Operating Budget 5,397,775$ 5,890,598$ 5,871,688$ 6,075,672$ 100.00%
Enrollment 990 1,015 1,014 1,039
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,452.30$ 5,803.54$ 5,790.62$ 5,847.62$ 0.98%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
177
Dolly Vogel Intermediate Campus Goals & Objectives
Tara Vandermark, Principal
GOAL 1: Vogel Intermediate will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 95% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Math, Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted
progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress)in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 50. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous year;
weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (African American and Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 52. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
90% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 96.9% to 98% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group
GOAL 2: Vogel Intermediate will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Vogel Intermediate will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Vogel Intermediate will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Vogel Intermediate will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
178
Dolly Vogel Intermediate School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 253,233$ 269,866$ 256,118$ 260,019$ 4.35%
14.4 14.4 Paraprofessionals / Aides 292,359 349,375 274,737 289,299 4.84%
3.0 3.0 Counselors 183,858 153,791 134,030 135,957 2.27%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 58,282 60,727 60,580 63,542 1.06%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 53,991 54,458 57,404 56,895 0.95%
70.2 68.2 Teachers 3,598,052 3,830,541 3,925,825 3,936,506 65.85%
91.6 89.6 4,439,775 4,718,758 4,708,694 4,742,218 79.33%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 782,759 855,082 835,905 844,593 14.13%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 89,581 117,704 53,983 113,007 1.89%
12 Instructional Resources 10,299 10,000 8,545 11,163 0.19%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 932 70 70 - 0.00%
23 School Leadership 3,000 4,000 4,000 4,749 0.08%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 721 1,695 830 775 0.01%
33 Health Services 597 1,434 599 600 0.01%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 185,114 291,617 163,828 260,906 4.36%
290,244 426,520 231,855 391,200 6.54%
Total Annual Operating Budget 5,512,778$ 6,000,360$ 5,776,454$ 5,978,011$ 100.00%
Enrollment 1,072 1,072 1,078 1,042
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,142.52$ 5,597.35$ 5,358.49$ 5,737.05$ 7.06%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
179
Travis Intermediate Campus Goals & Objectives
Tamika Taylor, Principal
GOAL 1: Travis Intermediate will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 90% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted
progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 38. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous
year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (Hispanic and African American) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 42. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
90% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 97.3% to 98.5% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group;
GOAL 2: Travis Intermediate will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Travis Intermediate will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement. GOAL 4: Travis Intermediate will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all
students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Travis Intermediate will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
180
Travis Intermediate School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 166,260$ 182,809$ 174,047$ 176,479$ 4.24%
4.5 4.5 Paraprofessionals / Aides 194,392 203,797 236,217 234,703 5.64%
1.8 1.8 Counselors 115,732 100,168 69,991 71,146 1.71%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 53,497 55,852 55,481 57,942 1.39%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 50,952 51,745 51,994 53,395 1.28%
37.3 37.3 Teachers 2,254,893 2,530,371 2,471,164 2,581,036 62.02%
47.6 47.6 2,835,726 3,124,742 3,058,894 3,174,701 76.28%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 528,362 599,782 590,739 615,234 14.78%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 66,599 103,100 73,442 101,660 2.44%
12 Instructional Resources 6,442 8,239 7,618 9,184 0.22%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 2,486 146 70 240 0.01%
23 School Leadership 1,631 1,383 1,241 1,450 0.03%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 548 1,984 712 775 0.02%
33 Health Services 593 1,434 598 600 0.01%
36 Co-curricular Activities - 1,102 1,086 1,177 0.03%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 281,983 225,183 197,685 256,879 6.17%
360,282 342,571 282,452 371,965 8.94%
Total Annual Operating Budget 3,724,370$ 4,067,095$ 3,932,085$ 4,161,900$ 100.00%
Enrollment 558 586 596 626
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 6,674.50$ 6,940.44$ 6,597.46$ 6,648.40$ 0.77%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
181
Cryar Intermediate Campus Goals & Objectives
Dr. Lloyd Swanson, Principal
GOAL 1: Cryar Intermediate will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 90% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted
progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 40. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous year;
weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year Hispanic and African‐American will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 50. Distinctions:
Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
45% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 96% to 97% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group;
GOAL 2: Cryar Intermediate will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objectives: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Cryar Intermediate will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Cryar Intermediate will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Cryar Intermediate will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
182
Cryar Intermediate School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
3.0 3.0 Administrators 176,339$ 191,625$ 181,292$ 185,213$ 4.34%
13.0 14.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 233,004 239,334 253,719 268,945 6.31%
2.0 2.0 Counselors 94,989 71,139 107,213 113,124 2.65%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 69,662 71,679 72,158 74,013 1.74%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 45,716 52,245 26,645 56,895 1.33%
47.8 48.8 Teachers 2,326,016 2,538,065 2,458,454 2,693,969 63.17%
67.8 69.8 2,945,726 3,164,087 3,099,481 3,392,159 79.54%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 522,598 586,765 580,962 599,779 14.06%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 40,165 67,260 43,586 77,987 1.83%
12 Instructional Resources 4,354 4,915 4,392 5,741 0.13%
13 Curriculum & Instruction - 70 70 - 0.00%
23 School Leadership 400 2,156 1,950 475 0.01%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 285 1,651 298 675 0.02%
33 Health Services 598 1,434 597 600 0.01%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 209,987 171,701 171,762 187,360 4.39%
53 Data Processing - 370 370 - 0.00%
255,789 249,557 223,025 272,838 6.40%
Total Annual Operating Budget 3,724,113$ 4,000,409$ 3,903,468$ 4,264,776$ 100.00%
Enrollment 606 611 630 673
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 6,145.40$ 6,547.31$ 6,195.98$ 6,336.96$ 2.28%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
183
Tom Cox Intermediate Campus Goals & Objectives
Debbie Spoon, Principal
GOAL 1: Tom Cox Intermediate will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 95% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Grade 5 Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted
progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 48. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous year;
weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year Hispanic and African‐American will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 55. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
90% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 97.0% to 97.1% 3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group;
GOAL 2: Tom Cox Intermediate will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objectives: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Tom Cox Intermediate will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Tom Cox Intermediate will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Tom Cox Intermediate will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
184
Tom Cox Intermediate School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
3.0 4.0 Administrators 231,706$ 182,930$ 258,405$ 329,542$ 5.10%
14.0 14.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 231,519 244,437 281,105 283,336 4.39%
2.0 2.0 Counselors 186,097 161,821 139,334 141,631 2.19%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 56,783 62,611 57,303 59,942 0.93%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 52,602 53,736 53,172 55,895 0.87%
62.0 69.0 Teachers 3,359,340 3,763,144 3,876,709 4,380,581 67.83%
83.0 91.0 4,118,047 4,468,679 4,666,028 5,250,927 81.31%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 735,150 800,522 829,787 882,718 13.67%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 61,346 121,215 93,640 118,294 1.83%
12 Instructional Resources 13,776 16,366 16,366 18,776 0.29%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 1,142 600 589 600 0.01%
23 School Leadership 3,789 3,818 3,559 3,786 0.06%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 775 2,026 1,010 850 0.01%
33 Health Services 599 1,434 600 600 0.01%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 189,671 174,090 193,006 181,638 2.81%
271,098 319,549 308,770 324,544 5.03%
Total Annual Operating Budget 5,124,295$ 5,588,750$ 5,804,585$ 6,458,189$ 100.00%
Enrollment 1,093 1,181 1,229 1,320
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 4,688.28$ 4,732.22$ 4,723.01$ 4,892.57$ 3.59%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
185
Bozman Intermediate Campus Goals & Objectives
Bethany Medford, Principal
GOAL 1: Bozman Intermediate will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close achievement gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 90% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR Alternate; STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Grade 5
Science 2. Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Fine Arts, GT, and ELL.
Index 2: Student Progress
Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted
progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 55. Distinctions: Student Progress 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps
All subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous year;
weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic group from the prior year (Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 60. Distinctions: Closing the Performance Gaps
Will meet Top 25% Closing Achievement Gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post‐Secondary Readiness
90% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: Post‐Secondary Readiness 1. Reading/ELA and Math: 50% of measures will be in top quartile 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 97.2% to 98%
3. Post‐secondary Readiness Distinction K‐8: Performance in top 25% of comparison group; GOAL 2: Bozman Intermediate will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning
for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Bozman Intermediate will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Bozman Intermediate will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safety.
GOAL 5: Bozman Intermediate will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
186
Bozman Intermediate School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 3.0 Administrators 170,541$ 187,148$ 184,380$ 264,232$ 5.31%
8.5 8.5 Paraprofessionals / Aides 226,579 246,216 264,658 243,232 4.89%
1.0 1.0 Counselors 114,195 93,203 64,450 65,495 1.32%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 53,404 55,292 55,324 57,042 1.15%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 51,679 53,155 54,638 55,395 1.11%
45.0 45.0 Teachers 2,578,135 2,957,040 3,088,758 3,285,403 66.03%
58.5 59.5 3,194,533 3,592,054 3,712,208 3,970,799 79.81%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 571,931 641,529 686,564 719,535 14.46%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 78,621 134,005 106,468 103,675 2.08%
12 Instructional Resources 9,152 8,090 7,511 8,601 0.17%
13 Curriculum & Instruction - 2,292 2,237 - 0.00%
23 School Leadership 1,626 1,556 1,556 2,121 0.04%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 390 1,472 453 750 0.02%
33 Health Services 580 1,434 599 600 0.01%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 175,871 111,637 169,895 169,451 3.41%
266,240 260,486 288,719 285,198 5.73%
Total Annual Operating Budget 4,032,704$ 4,494,069$ 4,687,491$ 4,975,532$ 100.00%
Enrollment 746 798 800 793
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,405.77$ 5,631.67$ 5,859.36$ 6,274.32$ 7.08%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
187
Conroe Independent School District
188
Secondary Schools2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
85.5 85.5 Administrators 7,401,485$ 7,898,080$ 7,585,706$ 7,755,803$ 4.66%
328.4 330.9 Paraprofessionals / Aides 7,621,800 8,022,905 8,487,335 8,808,986 5.29%
87.5 88.5 Counselors 6,302,459 5,634,877 5,174,966 5,398,491 3.24%
20.0 21.0 Librarians 1,134,496 1,187,499 1,080,458 1,225,302 0.74%
17.7 17.7 Nurses 876,478 895,955 912,069 931,612 0.56%
1,489.2 1,532.7 Teachers 89,175,146 96,150,621 97,750,973 102,132,642 61.37%
2,028.3 2,076.3 112,511,864 119,789,937 120,991,507 126,252,836 75.87%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 20,478,802 22,348,972 23,070,059 23,741,102 14.27%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 3,885,787 5,002,350 3,888,035 5,377,176 3.23%
12 Instructional Resources 309,032 343,545 289,745 349,394 0.21%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 27,682 27,310 16,185 42,250 0.03%
23 School Leadership 97,323 153,796 106,586 152,401 0.09%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 81,581 473,827 220,560 65,669 0.04%
32 Social Work Services 5,869 4,000 3,997 4,000 0.00%
33 Health Services 13,196 31,874 12,444 16,250 0.01%
36 Co-curricular Activities 3,170,165 3,765,101 3,378,783 4,011,670 2.41%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 7,529,813 6,433,960 5,394,976 6,401,908 3.85%
53 Data Processing 9,265 - - - 0.00%
81 Facilities Acquisition & Const. 530,829 381,655 297,256 - 0.00%
15,660,542 16,617,418 13,608,567 16,420,718 9.87%
Total Annual Operating Budget 148,651,208$ 158,756,327$ 157,670,133$ 166,414,656$ 100.00%
Enrollment 24,737 25,665 25,646 26,480
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 6,009.27$ 6,185.71$ 6,147.94$ 6,284.54$ 2.22%
189
Peet Junior High School Campus Goals & Objectives
Rotasha Smith, Principal
GOAL 1: Peet Junior High School will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 90% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR; STAAR A; STAAR Alternate, STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Grade 8 Science and Grade 8 Social Studies. 2. Math: will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in Algebra 1. 3. Science will meet AADD indicators for performance. 4. Social Studies will meet AADD indicators for performance.
Index 2: Student Progress; Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups,
ELL, Sp Ed; weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading, Writing, and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 42. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA, Writing, and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading, Writing, and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps; all subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing
racial/ethnic groups from the previous year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (Hispanic and African American) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 50. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post-Secondary Readiness
Post-secondary Readiness Standard: 45% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas.
Additional AADD Indicators: Increase Attendance Rate from 95.6% to 97%
GOAL 2: Peet Junior High School will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Peet Junior High School will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Peet Junior High School will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safe Schools.
GOAL 5: Peet Junior High School will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
190
Peet Junior High School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
4.0 4.0 Administrators 326,360$ 345,835$ 329,441$ 334,355$ 4.15%
15.4 15.4 Paraprofessionals / Aides 424,881 444,963 500,567 449,176 5.57%
2.0 2.0 Counselors 236,655 206,510 149,570 150,852 1.87%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 70,455 73,179 72,834 75,513 0.94%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 58,271 59,564 60,556 61,895 0.77%
73.0 76.0 Teachers 4,364,904 4,623,749 4,922,446 5,184,580 64.28%
96.4 99.4 5,481,526 5,753,800 6,035,414 6,256,371 77.57%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 1,029,624 1,130,018 1,126,577 1,170,448 14.51%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 144,180 196,054 170,204 223,442 2.77%
12 Instructional Resources 10,003 9,442 7,418 7,442 0.09%
23 School Leadership 2,849 4,287 3,955 6,530 0.08%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 1,485 13,421 6,639 3,200 0.04%
33 Health Services 595 1,554 650 1,200 0.01%
36 Co-curricular Activities 64,524 65,231 60,691 95,909 1.19%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 268,385 286,126 222,032 300,646 3.73%
492,021 576,115 471,589 638,369 7.92%
Total Annual Operating Budget 7,003,171$ 7,459,933$ 7,633,580$ 8,065,188$ 100.00%
Enrollment 1,211 1,240 1,256 1,313
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,782.97$ 6,016.08$ 6,077.69$ 6,142.57$ 1.07%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
191
Washington Junior High School Campus Goals & Objectives
Hartwell Brown, Principal
GOAL 1: Washington Junior High School will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 78% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR; STAAR A; STAAR Alternate, STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Grade 8 Science, and Grade 8 Social Studies.
Index 2: Student Progress; Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups,
ELL, Sp. Ed; weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 45. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA, Writing, and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading, Writing, and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps; all subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing
racial/ethnic groups from the previous year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year, Hispanic and African American, will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 45. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post-Secondary Readiness Post-secondary Readiness Standard: 35% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% STAAR Post-secondary Readiness Standard Additional AADD Indicators: 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 96.0% to 97.5% Grade 3-12 Safeguard Indicators 3. Safeguard Target for Participation Rate: 100%
GOAL 2: Washington Junior High School will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Washington Junior High School will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Washington Junior High School will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safe Schools.
GOAL 5: Washington Junior High School will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
192
Washington Junior High School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
3.0 3.0 Administrators 256,445$ 277,679$ 263,243$ 268,990$ 4.25%
13.5 13.5 Paraprofessionals / Aides 242,959 305,779 350,865 390,473 6.17%
2.0 2.0 Counselors 125,046 90,857 130,058 130,620 2.06%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 59,605 65,383 57,145 63,042 1.00%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 54,096 55,382 56,873 57,895 0.91%
50.5 50.5 Teachers 3,248,543 3,613,296 3,841,127 3,962,901 62.58%
71.0 71.0 3,986,694 4,408,376 4,699,311 4,873,921 76.97%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 553,950 854,077 929,436 960,778 15.17%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 125,236 194,375 160,295 164,435 2.60%
12 Instructional Resources 14,401 15,213 13,193 14,353 0.23%
23 School Leadership 1,848 3,793 3,491 4,156 0.07%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 805 7,752 3,276 1,200 0.02%
33 Health Services 669 1,554 568 700 0.01%
36 Co-curricular Activities 48,896 59,514 55,120 93,182 1.47%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 352,669 256,715 271,717 219,894 3.47%
544,524 538,916 507,660 497,920 7.86%
Total Annual Operating Budget 5,085,168$ 5,801,369$ 6,136,407$ 6,332,619$ 100.00%
Enrollment 735 815 769 791
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 6,918.60$ 7,118.24$ 7,979.72$ 8,005.84$ 0.33%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
193
Knox Junior High School Campus Goals & Objectives
Joe Daw, Principal
GOAL 1: Knox Junior High School will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement Grades 7/8; all subjects; all students; % met phase-in
Level II standard 95% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet phase-in Level II performance standard in STAAR; STAAR A, STAAR Alternate, and STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Grade 8 Science and Grade 8 Social Studies. 2. Reading will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation 3. Math: will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in Algebra I 4. Science will meet AADD indicators for performance. 5. Social Studies will meet AADD indicators for performance.
Index 2: Student Progress Grades 7/8; Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7
racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp. Ed; weighted progress 53% of ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities, and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps Grades 3-8, HS; all subjects; eco dis and 2
lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous year; weighted
performance (phase-in Level II) 90% of Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous year (AA and Hispanic.) will meet the weighted performance phase-in Level II or above. Will meet Top 25% Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math
Index 4: Post-Secondary Readiness 75% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on one or more tests combined over all subject areas. Meet Campus Academic Achievement Distinction Designations (AADD) in Reading/ELA and Math 7/8 50% of measures will be in top quartile Grades 7/8 AADD Indicators Increase Attendance Rate from 96.1% to 97.5%
GOAL 2: Knox Junior High School will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Knox Junior High School will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: To enhance communication, collaboration, and involvement among the staff, parents, and community to support the students of Knox Junior High School.
GOAL 4: Knox Junior High School will strive to ensure a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: To provide a safe school environment for all students and staff.
GOAL 5: Knox Junior High School will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: To ensure that all students and staff utilize technology as a tool for learning.
194
Knox Junior High School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
3.0 3.0 Administrators 253,945$ 277,141$ 314,296$ 341,262$ 4.63%
12.0 12.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 335,883 328,158 374,709 387,960 5.27%
2.0 2.0 Counselors 157,168 125,973 132,012 132,584 1.80%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 64,304 70,863 4,432 72,989 0.99%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 53,612 54,458 55,937 56,895 0.77%
68.0 72.0 Teachers 3,986,013 4,260,667 4,522,822 4,827,580 65.56%
87.0 91.0 4,850,925 5,117,260 5,404,208 5,819,270 79.03%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 884,928 977,894 976,989 965,401 13.11%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 120,816 174,229 142,118 167,824 2.28%
12 Instructional Resources 14,509 17,311 14,756 19,137 0.26%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 70 - - - 0.00%
23 School Leadership 8,110 12,725 9,317 13,001 0.18%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 1,754 12,310 6,138 950 0.01%
33 Health Services 2,569 2,510 1,046 1,650 0.02%
36 Co-curricular Activities 62,782 75,657 66,726 97,510 1.32%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 502,002 261,824 224,783 278,921 3.79%
53 Data Processing 8,965 - - - 0.00%
721,577 556,566 464,884 578,993 7.86%
Total Annual Operating Budget 6,457,430$ 6,651,720$ 6,846,081$ 7,363,664$ 100.00%
Enrollment 1,252 1,287 1,336 1,357
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,157.69$ 5,168.39$ 5,124.31$ 5,426.43$ 5.90%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
195
York Junior High School Campus Goals & Objectives
Chris Povich, Principal
GOAL 1: York Junior High School will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 95% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR; STAAR A; STAAR Alternate, STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Grade 8 Science and EOC Biology, and Grade 8 Social Studies and EOC US History. 2. Reading and Math: will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in SAT, ACT, AP, Algebra 1. 3. Science will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in ACT, AP. 4. Social Studies will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in AP.
Index 2: Student Progress; Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups,
ELL, Sp Ed; weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 45. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA, Writing, and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading, Writing, and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps; all subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing
racial/ethnic groups from the previous year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (African American and Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 60%. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post-Secondary Readiness Post-secondary Readiness Standard: 95% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Post-secondary Readiness Distinction HS: Performance at least 33% of indicators in top quartile
Additional AADD Indicators: 2. Increase Attendance Rate from 96.7% to 97.5%
GOAL 2: York Junior High School will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: York Junior High School will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: York Junior High School will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safe Schools.
GOAL 5: York Junior High School will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
196
York Junior High School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 252,649$ 274,832$ 259,646$ 260,879$ 3.91%
9.0 9.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 276,877 335,917 324,943 376,510 5.65%
2.0 2.0 Counselors 179,234 157,386 125,968 127,999 1.92%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 54,799 57,150 56,988 59,442 0.89%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 49,589 50,325 51,975 51,975 0.78%
61.1 65.1 Teachers 3,414,086 4,960,157 3,905,640 4,207,994 63.12%
76.1 80.1 4,227,234 5,835,767 4,725,160 5,084,799 76.27%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 775,012 895,113 895,670 958,214 14.37%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 147,682 172,591 132,709 180,560 2.71%
12 Instructional Resources 16,702 20,675 17,806 19,632 0.29%
23 School Leadership 1,222 1,692 1,561 3,859 0.06%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 1,649 11,352 5,659 2,450 0.04%
33 Health Services 630 1,535 646 600 0.01%
36 Co-curricular Activities 62,388 70,523 70,042 94,555 1.42%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 304,244 265,322 257,873 322,264 4.83%
534,517 543,690 486,296 623,920 9.36%
Total Annual Operating Budget 5,536,763$ 7,274,570$ 6,107,126$ 6,666,933$ 100.00%
Enrollment 1,002 1,129 1,118 1,220
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,525.71$ 6,443.37$ 5,462.55$ 5,464.70$ 0.04%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
197
Moorhead Junior High School Campus Goals & Objectives
Dr. Jeff Stichler, Principal
GOAL 1: Moorhead Junior High School will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 82% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR; STAAR A; STAAR Alternate, STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math,
Grade 8 Science and EOC Biology, and Grade 8 Social Studies and EOC US History. 2. Reading and Math: will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in
SAT, ACT, AP, Algebra 1. 3. Science will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in ACT, AP. 4. Social Studies will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in AP.
Index 2: Student Progress; Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic
groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading, Writing, and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 42. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA, Writing, and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading, Writing, and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps; all subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing
racial/ethnic groups from the previous year; weighted performance (Level II and
Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (Eco Dis and Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 45. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post-Secondary Readiness
Postsecondary Readiness Standard: 35% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas.
GOAL 2: Moorhead Junior High School will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Moorhead Junior High School will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Moorhead Junior High School will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safe Schools.
GOAL 5: Moorhead Junior High School will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
198
Moorhead Junior High School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
4.0 4.0 Administrators 306,954$ 345,758$ 328,380$ 333,442$ 4.42%
16.0 16.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 406,388 399,536 459,303 461,933 6.12%
2.0 2.0 Counselors 217,149 187,631 145,266 141,831 1.88%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 63,273 66,080 66,659 68,632 0.91%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 51,353 52,805 53,997 54,895 0.73%
69.0 69.0 Teachers 4,233,276 4,365,622 4,563,648 4,683,991 62.06%
93.0 93.0 5,278,393 5,417,432 5,617,253 5,744,724 76.11%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 1,016,942 1,113,104 1,122,372 1,153,305 15.28%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 136,869 186,408 165,529 209,038 2.77%
12 Instructional Resources 15,234 9,484 9,000 11,163 0.15%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 630 715 715 - 0.00%
23 School Leadership 1,015 3,002 2,770 4,215 0.06%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 1,496 10,545 5,258 2,250 0.03%
33 Health Services 2,031 3,309 1,383 2,350 0.03%
36 Co-curricular Activities 58,477 74,540 67,819 99,471 1.32%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 255,539 312,314 207,125 321,522 4.26%
471,291 600,317 459,599 650,009 8.61%
Total Annual Operating Budget 6,766,626$ 7,130,853$ 7,199,224$ 7,548,038$ 100.00%
Enrollment 1,085 1,078 1,056 1,066
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 6,236.52$ 6,614.89$ 6,817.45$ 7,080.71$ 3.86%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
199
McCullough Junior High School Campus Goals & Objectives
Chris McCord, Principal
GOAL 1: McCullough Junior High School will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 98% of all students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR; STAAR A; STAAR Alternate, STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Grade 8 Science and EOC Biology, and Grade 8 Social Studies and EOC US History. 2. Reading and Math: will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in SAT, ACT, AP, Algebra 1. 3. Science will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in ACT, AP. 4. Social Studies will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in AP.
Index 2: Student Progress; Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups,
ELL, Sp Ed; weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 51. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA, Writing, and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading, Writing, and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps; all subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing
racial/ethnic groups from the previous year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (African American and Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 62. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post-Secondary Readiness Post-secondary Readiness Standard: 70% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. Distinctions: 1. Postsecondary Readiness Distinction HS: Performance at least 33% of indicators in top quartile
Additional AADD Indicators: Increase Attendance Rate from 97.0% to 97.7%
GOAL 2: McCullough Junior High School will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: McCullough Junior High School will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: McCullough Junior High School will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safe Schools.
GOAL 5: McCullough Junior High School will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
200
McCullough Junior High School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
6.0 6.0 Administrators 420,836$ 453,345$ 415,106$ 421,952$ 3.64%
17.0 17.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 526,841 500,601 601,408 553,699 4.77%
4.0 4.0 Counselors 370,839 319,636 272,647 276,560 2.38%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 61,723 56,241 61,089 57,991 0.50%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 54,352 54,883 56,639 57,395 0.49%
113.5 114.5 Teachers 6,627,695 6,880,492 7,365,314 7,647,267 65.94%
142.5 143.5 8,062,286 8,265,198 8,772,203 9,014,864 77.73%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 1,487,627 1,614,631 1,692,888 1,727,336 14.89%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 169,660 218,514 185,222 250,312 2.16%
12 Instructional Resources 31,249 37,088 35,130 36,520 0.31%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 140 - - - 0.00%
23 School Leadership 8,428 11,120 9,372 10,902 0.09%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 979 18,965 9,456 1,350 0.01%
33 Health Services 634 1,554 644 1,600 0.01%
36 Co-curricular Activities 75,859 98,391 84,868 145,344 1.25%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 429,677 442,290 368,653 409,692 3.53%
53 Data Processing 300 - - - 0.00%
716,926 827,922 693,345 855,720 7.38%
Total Annual Operating Budget 10,266,839$ 10,707,751$ 11,158,436$ 11,597,920$ 100.00%
Enrollment 2,229 2,218 2,224 2,236
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 4,606.03$ 4,827.66$ 5,017.28$ 5,186.91$ 3.38%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
201
Irons Junior High School Campus Goals & Objectives
Jeff Fuller, Principal
GOAL 1: Irons Junior High School will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement; all subjects; all students; % met phase-in Level II standard 95% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet phase-in Level II performance standard in STAAR 7/8; STAAR, STAAR A and STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Grade 8 Science, and Grade 8 Social Studies. 2. Reading and Math will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation 3. Science will meet AADD indicators for performance. 4. Social Studies will meet AADD indicators for performance.
Index 2: Student Progress; Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups,
ELL, Sp Ed; weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities, and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading, Writing, and Math earning an Index 2 score of 45. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA, Writing, and Math 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading, Writing, and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps, all subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing
racial/ethnic groups from the previous year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous year (Hispanic and African American) will meet the weighted performance phase-in Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 55. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math
Index 4: Post-Secondary Readiness
Post-secondary Readiness Standard: 70% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on one or more tests combined over all subject areas.
Additional AADD Indicators: Increase Attendance Rate from 96% to 97%.
GOAL 2: Irons Junior High School will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Irons Junior High School will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Irons Junior High School will provide a safe and orderly school environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safe Schools.
GOAL 5: Irons Junior High School will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
202
Irons Junior High School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
3.0 3.0 Administrators 250,147$ 272,478$ 261,269$ 262,102$ 3.82%
13.0 13.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 336,727 393,679 407,901 430,293 6.27%
3.0 3.0 Counselors 183,997 155,535 131,146 133,435 1.94%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 58,338 61,171 60,780 64,042 0.93%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 43,378 50,325 51,205 51,975 0.76%
66.0 66.0 Teachers 3,610,436 3,889,670 4,224,824 4,348,037 63.34%
87.0 87.0 4,483,023 4,822,858 5,137,125 5,289,884 77.06%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 616,561 984,795 1,017,601 1,054,989 15.37%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 102,029 139,150 112,078 171,873 2.50%
12 Instructional Resources 16,755 19,499 15,477 19,722 0.29%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 140 - - - 0.00%
23 School Leadership 2,222 5,255 2,207 4,393 0.06%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 339 13,397 5,791 2,650 0.04%
33 Health Services 638 5,738 1,772 2,350 0.03%
36 Co-curricular Activities 46,094 63,530 63,050 104,446 1.52%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 237,608 162,325 194,358 213,960 3.12%
405,825 408,894 394,733 519,394 7.57%
Total Annual Operating Budget 5,505,409$ 6,216,547$ 6,549,459$ 6,864,267$ 100.00%
Enrollment 1,102 1,169 1,145 1,164
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 4,995.83$ 5,317.83$ 5,720.05$ 5,897.14$ 3.10%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
203
Conroe High School Campus Goals & Objectives
Dr. Mark Weatherly, Principal
GOAL 1: Conroe High School will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post-secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement Grades 9-12
All subjects; all students; % met phase-in Level II standard 90% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard on STAAR; STAAR A; STAAR Alternate, STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in EOC English, EOC Algebra, EOC Biology, and EOC US History. 2. Reading and Math: will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in SAT, ACT, AP, Algebra 1. 3. Science will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in ACT, AP. 4. Social Studies will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in AP.
Index 2: Student Progress; Reading, and Math; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed;
weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading, Writing, and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 33. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA, Writing, and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading, Writing, and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps; all subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic
groups from the previous year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) 90% Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (AA and Hisp) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 55. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance Gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post-Secondary Readiness
Post-secondary Readiness Standard:90% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas.
4-Year/5-Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate 94% of students (all students and 7 race/ethnic groups, special education, and ELL) will graduate on the four-year or five-year graduation plan.
4-Year/5-Year Longitudinal RHSP/DAP Rate 90.5% of students (all students and 7 race/ethnic groups) will graduate on the RHSP/DAP Plan.
Post-secondary Indicator Score (college-ready graduates) 60% of students (all students, Sp. Ed., ELL Students, and 7 race/ethnic groups) will meet or exceed the TSI criteria in both ELA and mathematics on the TAKS exit-level test, SAT, or ACT. Distinctions: Post-secondary Readiness Distinction HS: Performance at least 33% of indicators in top quartile
GOAL 2: Conroe High School will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Conroe High School will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating on Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Conroe High School will strive to ensure a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safe Schools.
GOAL 5: Conroe High School will ensure that all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
204
Conroe High School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
12.5 12.5 Administrators 1,174,393$ 1,237,086$ 1,183,800$ 1,200,085$ 4.83%
49.5 49.5 Paraprofessionals / Aides 1,135,292 1,142,091 1,247,861 1,332,144 5.37%
14.4 14.4 Counselors 1,045,389 895,155 883,089 955,534 3.85%
3.0 3.0 Librarians 140,654 145,350 144,174 149,056 0.60%
3.0 3.0 Nurses 113,497 115,549 118,525 119,970 0.48%
219.5 225.5 Teachers 12,960,754 14,137,078 14,115,572 14,633,434 58.95%
301.9 307.9 16,569,979 17,672,309 17,693,021 18,390,223 74.09%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 3,188,702 3,473,891 3,466,155 3,545,265 14.28%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 701,411 760,725 584,046 967,533 3.90%
12 Instructional Resources 24,471 25,914 23,118 23,922 0.10%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 13,168 14,030 13,557 14,000 0.06%
23 School Leadership 21,180 34,311 28,943 31,653 0.13%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 50,951 150,388 74,677 7,484 0.03%
32 Social Work 5,869 4,000 3,997 4,000 0.02%
33 Health Services 1,213 3,108 1,288 1,300 0.01%
36 Co-curricular Activities 505,942 507,476 476,889 723,546 2.91%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 1,058,186 1,306,710 975,972 1,112,929 4.48%
81 Facilities Acquisition & Const. 100,000 25,000 - - 0.00%
2,482,391 2,831,662 2,182,487 2,886,367 11.63%
Total Annual Operating Budget 22,241,072$ 23,977,862$ 23,341,663$ 24,821,855$ 100.00%
Enrollment 3,184 3,336 3,283 3,385
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 6,985.26$ 7,187.61$ 7,109.86$ 7,332.90$ 3.14%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
205
Hauke Academic Alternative High School Campus Goals & Objectives
Paula Nicolini, Principal
GOAL 1: Hauke Academic Alternative School will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 80% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard on STAAR; STAAR A; STAAR Alternate, STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Grade 8 Science and EOC Biology, and Grade 8 Social Studies and EOC US History. 2. Reading and Math: will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in SAT, ACT, AP, Algebra 1. 3. Science will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in ACT, AP. 4. Social Studies will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in AP.
Index 2: Student Progress; Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic
groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading, Writing, and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 22. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA, Writing, and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading, Writing, and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps; all subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing
racial/ethnic groups from the previous year; weighted performance (Level II and Level
III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (African American and Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 36. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance Gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post-Secondary Readiness
Post-secondary Readiness Standard:20% of all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas.
4-Year/5-Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate 95% of students (all students and 7 race/ethnic groups, special education, and ELL) will graduate on the four-year of five-year graduation plan.
4-Year/5-Year Longitudinal RHSP/DAP Rate 20% of students (all students and 7 race/ethnic groups, special education, and ELL) will graduate on the RHSP/DAP Plan.
Post-secondary Indicator Score (college-ready graduates) 20% of students (all students, Sp. Ed., ELL students, and 7 race/ethnic groups) will meet or exceed the TSI criteria in both ELA and math on the TAKS exit-level test, SAT, or ACT. Distinctions: 1. Post-secondary Readiness Distinction HS: Performance at least 33% of indicators in top quartile
GOAL 2: Hauke Academic Alternative School will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Hauke Academic Alternative School will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Hauke Academic Alternative School will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safe Schools.
GOAL 5: Hauke Academic Alternative School will utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
206
Hauke Academic Alternative High School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
2.0 2.0 Administrators 103,408$ 111,073$ 105,529$ 108,168$ 4.92%
3.0 3.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 78,619 79,199 78,174 67,378 3.07%
2.5 2.5 Counselors 69,638 57,681 42,354 73,607 3.35%
1.0 1.0 Librarians 31,293 32,232 27,811 33,199 1.51%
1.4 1.4 Nurses 52,075 53,320 54,244 54,970 2.50%
17.1 17.1 Teachers 1,266,860 1,299,508 1,345,918 1,349,741 61.42%
27.0 27.0 1,601,893 1,633,013 1,654,030 1,687,063 76.77%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 293,843 319,586 302,685 303,617 13.82%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 65,063 76,613 66,295 114,133 5.19%
12 Instructional Resources 2,528 2,466 2,263 2,498 0.11%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 70 - - - 0.00%
23 School Leadership 702 541 323 594 0.03%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 351 1,806 677 2,001 0.09%
33 Health Services 198 478 66 200 0.01%
36 Co-curricular Activities 5,246 6,222 5,912 - 0.00%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 50,027 81,740 51,738 87,428 3.98%
124,185 169,866 127,274 206,854 9.41%
Total Annual Operating Budget 2,019,921$ 2,122,465$ 2,083,989$ 2,197,534$ 100.00%
Enrollment 152 149 145 152
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 13,288.95$ 14,244.73$ 14,372.34$ 14,457.46$ 0.59%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
207
The Woodlands High School Campus Goals & Objectives
Gregg Colschen, Principal
GOAL 1: The Woodlands High School will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; 96% met Level II standard 96% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR; STAAR A; STAAR Alternate, STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: ● Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, EOC Biology, and EOC US History. ● Reading and Math: will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in SAT, ACT, AP, Algebra 1. ● Science will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in ACT, AP. ● Social Studies will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in AP.
Index 2: Student Progress; Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic
groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading, Writing, and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 32 or higher. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA, Writing, and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading, Writing, and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps; all subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing
racial/ethnic groups from the previous year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (Hispanic and Asian) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 59 or higher. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Achievement Gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post-Secondary Readiness
● Postsecondary Readiness Standard: 90% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas.
● 4-Year/5-Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate 98% of students (all students and 7 race/ethnic groups, Sp. Ed., and ELL) will graduate on the 4-year or 5-year graduation plan.
● 4-Year/5-Year Longitudinal RHSP/DAP Rate 95% of students (all students and 7 race/ethnic groups) will graduate on the RHSP/DAP Plan.
● Postsecondary Indicator Score (college-ready graduates) 90% of students (all students, Sp. Ed., ELL students, and 7 race/ethnic groups) will meet or exceed the TSI criteria in both ELA and math on the TAKS exit-level test, SAT, or ACT.
Distinctions ● Postsecondary Readiness: Performance at least 33% of indicators in top quartile
GOAL 2: The Woodlands High School will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: The Woodlands High School will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: The Woodlands High School will provide a safe school environment for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safe Schools.
GOAL 5: The Woodlands High School will utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
208
The Woodlands High School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
13.0 13.0 Administrators 1,183,791$ 1,268,194$ 1,164,160$ 1,233,833$ 4.89%
52.2 52.7 Paraprofessionals / Aides 1,008,961 1,074,474 1,038,593 1,112,334 4.41%
18.1 18.1 Counselors 1,096,437 982,828 963,990 977,677 3.88%
3.0 3.0 Librarians 173,893 186,919 183,826 192,375 0.76%
2.0 2.0 Nurses 121,067 121,708 122,461 123,977 0.49%
224.7 232.2 Teachers 14,144,934 14,681,430 14,758,747 15,367,355 60.96%
313.0 321.0 17,729,083 18,315,553 18,231,777 19,007,551 75.40%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 3,158,278 3,405,067 3,351,896 3,468,938 13.76%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 523,211 886,559 676,770 807,778 3.20%
12 Instructional Resources 61,470 66,621 64,346 70,701 0.28%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 378 7,416 - - 0.00%
23 School Leadership 14,069 21,821 3,687 23,143 0.09%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 6,497 80,359 32,491 7,484 0.03%
33 Health Services 1,296 3,122 1,300 1,300 0.01%
36 Co-curricular Activities 781,594 1,041,017 911,082 817,719 3.24%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 1,057,904 956,363 896,744 1,002,929 3.98%
81 Facilities Acquisition & Const. 430,829 336,184 297,256 - 0.00%
2,877,248 3,399,462 2,883,676 2,731,054 10.83%
Total Annual Operating Budget 23,764,609$ 25,120,082$ 24,467,349$ 25,207,543$ 100.00%
Enrollment 4,151 4,224 4,268 4,376
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,725.03$ 5,946.99$ 5,732.74$ 5,760.41$ 0.48%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
209
Oak Ridge High School Campus Goals & Objectives Tommy Johnson, Principal
GOAL 1: Oak Ridge High School will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for
graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 98% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR; STAAR A; STAAR Alternate, STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in EOCs in English I, English II, Algebra I, Biology, and EOC US History. 2. Reading and Math: will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in SAT, ACT, AP, Algebra 1. 3. Science will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in ACT, AP. 4. Social Studies will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in AP.
Index 2: Student Progress Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading, Writing, and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 40. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA, Writing, and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading, Writing, and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps; all subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous year ; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (AA and Hisp) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of >60. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance Gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post-Secondary Readiness Post-secondary Readiness Standard: 83% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. 4-Year/5-Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate 98% of students (all students and 7 race/ethnic groups, special education, and ELL) will graduate on the four-year or five-year graduation plan. 4-Year/5-Year Longitudinal RHSP/DAP Rate 94% of students (all students and 7 race/ethnic groups, special education, and ELL) will graduate on the RHSP/DAP Plan. Distinctions 1. Post-secondary Readiness Distinction HS: Performance at least 33% of indicators in top quartile Additional AADD Indicators: Increase Attendance Rate from 95.4% to 96.5%
GOAL 2: Oak Ridge High School will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Oak Ridge High School will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Oak Ridge High School will provide a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safe Schools.
GOAL 5: Oak Ridge High School will utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
210
Oak Ridge High School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
13.0 13.0 Administrators 1,059,106$ 1,143,204$ 1,100,512$ 1,105,539$ 4.64%
52.8 52.8 Paraprofessionals / Aides 1,188,992 1,282,950 1,324,856 1,381,920 5.80%
14.5 14.5 Counselors 1,017,455 922,453 814,510 826,303 3.47%
3.0 3.0 Librarians 166,080 176,336 148,201 127,823 0.54%
2.0 2.0 Nurses 115,897 118,652 121,528 123,480 0.52%
210.0 221.0 Teachers 12,263,241 13,317,200 13,608,609 14,361,229 60.29%
295.3 306.3 15,810,771 16,960,795 17,118,216 17,926,294 75.26%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 2,908,698 3,237,243 3,221,886 3,354,399 14.08%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 650,337 819,384 633,462 820,034 3.44%
12 Instructional Resources 38,540 44,907 38,709 45,507 0.19%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 70 - - - 0.00%
23 School Leadership 19,897 23,979 18,852 22,485 0.09%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 5,808 64,735 31,408 20,704 0.09%
33 Health Services 1,240 3,108 1,300 1,300 0.01%
36 Co-curricular Activities 543,678 690,490 612,622 682,001 2.86%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 1,826,447 1,053,917 746,769 947,929 3.98%
81 Facilities Acquisition & Const. - 1,920 - - 0.00%
3,086,017 2,702,440 2,083,122 2,539,960 10.66%
Total Annual Operating Budget 21,805,486$ 22,900,478$ 22,423,224$ 23,820,653$ 100.00%
Enrollment 3,642 3,813 3,870 4,080
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 5,987.23$ 6,005.90$ 5,794.11$ 5,838.40$ 0.76%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
211
Academy of Science and Technology Campus Goals Dr. Susan Caffery, Headmaster
GOAL 1: The Academy of Science and Technology will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 100% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR; STAAR A; STAAR Alternate, STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Grade 8 Science and EOC Biology, and Grade 8 Social Studies and EOC US History. 2. Reading and Math: will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in SAT, ACT, AP, Algebra 1. 3. Science will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in ACT, AP. 4. Social Studies will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in AP.
Index 2: Student Progress Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading, Writing, and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 15. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA, Writing, and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading, Writing, and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps; all subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (African American and Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 31. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post-Secondary Readiness Post-secondary Readiness Standard: 100% all Academy students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. 4-Year/5-Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate 100% of all Academy students (all students, Sp.Ed., ELL Students, and 7 race/ethnic groups) will graduate on the four-year or five-year graduation plan. 4-Year/5-Year Longitudinal RHSP/DAP Rate 100% of students (all students and 7 race/ethnic groups) will graduate on the RHSP/DAP Plan. Post-secondary Indicator Score (college-ready graduates) 100% of students (all students, Sp. Ed., ELL students, and 7 race/ethnic groups) will meet or exceed the TSI criteria in both ELA and math on the TAKS exit-level test, SAT, or ACT. Distinctions 1. Post-secondary Readiness Distinction HS: Performance at least 33% of indicators in top quartile
GOAL 2: The Academy of Science and Technology will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: The Academy of Science and Technology will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: The Academy of Science and Technology will strive to ensure a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safe Schools.
GOAL 5: The Academy of Science and Technology will utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
212
Academy of Science and Technology2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
1.0 1.0 Administrators 98,910$ 103,128$ 100,894$ 103,813$ 12.45%
1.0 1.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 29,825 30,223 33,598 33,934 4.07%
- - Counselors - - - - 0.00%
- - Librarians - - - - 0.00%
- - Nurses - - - - 0.00%
7.5 7.5 Teachers 466,697 487,339 495,809 506,513 60.75%
9.5 9.5 595,432 620,690 630,301 644,260 77.27%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 107,301 119,580 119,286 122,905 14.74%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 23,322 81,515 63,553 61,506 7.38%
13 Curriculum & Instruction - 800 549 - 0.00%
23 School Leadership 1,275 2,384 2,030 950 0.11%
36 Co-curricular Activities 45,593 44,607 36,495 1,884 0.23%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations - 1,600 - 2,225 0.27%
70,190 130,906 102,627 66,565 7.98%
Total Annual Operating Budget 772,923$ 871,176$ 852,214$ 833,730$ 100.00%
Enrollment 288 289 289 288
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 2,683.76$ 3,014.45$ 2,948.84$ 2,894.90$ -1.83%
*Note: The Academy of Science and Technology's STAAR results are included in the The Woodlands College Park High School's results.
213
Discipline Alternative Campus - DAEP / JJAEP Campus Goals & Objectives
Jeffery Eldridge, Principal
GOAL 1: DAEP/JJAEP will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 90% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR; STAAR A; STAAR Alternate, STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Grade 8 Science and EOC Biology, and Grade 8 Social Studies and EOC US History. 2. Reading and Math: will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in SAT, ACT, AP, Algebra 1.
3. Science will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in ACT, AP. 4. Social Studies will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in AP.
Index 2: Student Progress; Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups,
ELL, Sp Ed; weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading, Writing, and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 90%.
Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA, Writing, and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading, Writing, and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps; all subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing
racial/ethnic groups from the previous year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (2014 and 2015) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 25.
Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post-Secondary Readiness
Post-secondary Readiness Standard 90% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final Level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas.
Distinctions: 1. Post-secondary Readiness Distinction HS: Performance at least 33% of indicators in top quartile
Additional AADD Indicators: Increase Attendance Rate from 90% to 92%.
GOAL 2: DAEP/JJAEP will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: DAEP/JJAEP will work jointly with parents and Montgomery County staff to ensure a collaborative partnership while their child is assigned to DAEP/JJAEP.
Objective: To enhance communication, collaboration, and involvement among the staff, parents, and community to support the students of DAEP/JJAEP.
GOAL 4: DAEP/JJAEP will strive to ensure a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safe Schools.
GOAL 5: DAEP/JJAEP will utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
214
Discipline Alternative Campus - DAEP/JJAEP2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
1.0 1.0 Administrators 104,462$ 111,316$ 106,570$ 109,649$ 5.93%
2.0 2.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 56,263 30,992 91,930 94,683 5.12%
2.0 2.0 Counselors 82,810 70,843 81,909 82,502 4.47%
- - Librarians - - - - 0.00%
0.3 0.3 Nurses - - - - 0.00%
18.1 18.1 Teachers 1,097,751 1,096,838 1,143,282 1,219,117 65.99%
23.4 23.4 1,341,286 1,309,989 1,423,691 1,505,951 81.51%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 228,707 236,227 248,848 259,687 14.06%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 25,910 47,759 37,962 68,128 3.69%
23 School Leadership 37 365 37 356 0.02%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. - 407 407 400 0.02%
33 Health Services 84 956 391 100 0.01%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 5,335 6,700 9,306 12,929 0.70%
31,366 56,187 48,103 81,913 4.43%
Total Annual Operating Budget 1,601,359$ 1,602,403$ 1,720,642$ 1,847,551$ 100.00%
Enrollment 44 47 33 43
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 36,394.52$ 34,093.68$ 52,140.67$ 42,966.30$ -17.60%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
215
Caney Creek High School Campus Goals & Objectives
Trish McClure, Principal
GOAL 1: Caney Creek High School will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close the performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 90% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR; STAAR A; STAAR Alternate, STAAR L. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in EOC English, Biology, Algebra, and US History. 2. Reading and Math: will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in SAT, ACT, and AP. 3. Science will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in ACT and AP. 4. Social Studies will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in AP.
Index 2: Student Progress; Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic
groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading, Writing, and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 24. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in ELA and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in ELA and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps, HS; all subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing
racial/ethnic groups from the previous year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 50. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance Gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post-Secondary Readiness
Post-secondary Readiness Standard: 55% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas.
4-Year/5-Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate for all students and 7 race/ethnic groups, special education, and ELL will be 95%.
4-Year/5-Year Longitudinal RHSP/DAP Rate 93% of students (all students and 7 race/ethnic groups) will graduate on the RHSP/DAP Plan.
Post-secondary Indicator Score (college-ready graduates) for all students and 7 race/ethnic groups, special education, and ELL will be 75%. Distinctions 1. Post-secondary Readiness Distinction HS: Performance at least 33% of indicators in top quartile
GOAL 2: Caney Creek High School will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: Caney Creek High School will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: Will receive a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: Caney Creek High School will strive to ensure a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safe Schools.
GOAL 5: Caney Creek High School will utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: Will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
216
Caney Creek High School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
8.0 8.0 Administrators 711,760$ 736,261$ 732,234$ 752,751$ 5.26%
34.0 35.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 696,595 731,536 712,623 777,028 5.43%
8.0 9.0 Counselors 720,682 748,239 553,665 625,705 4.37%
1.0 2.0 Librarians 62,553 66,613 64,935 125,874 0.88%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 53,143 53,155 50,006 56,895 0.40%
120.0 124.0 Teachers 7,384,182 7,762,907 7,895,550 8,444,817 58.99%
172.0 179.0 9,628,915 10,098,711 10,009,013 10,783,070 75.33%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 1,890,135 1,418,569 2,006,580 2,056,865 14.37%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 383,880 448,091 319,237 510,410 3.57%
12 Instructional Resources 28,358 32,833 29,910 34,250 0.24%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 10,571 - - - 0.00%
23 School Leadership 11,080 12,663 10,630 12,747 0.09%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 4,505 35,206 16,506 6,727 0.05%
33 Health Services 700 1,674 698 800 0.01%
36 Co-curricular Activities 335,636 373,930 321,505 497,700 3.48%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 500,480 413,695 379,538 411,917 2.88%
81 Facilities Acquisition & Const. - 18,500 - - 0.00%
1,275,210 1,336,592 1,078,024 1,474,551 10.30%
Total Annual Operating Budget 12,794,260$ 12,853,872$ 13,093,617$ 14,314,486$ 100.00%
Enrollment 1,827 1,938 1,925 2,015
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 7,002.88$ 6,632.54$ 6,801.88$ 7,103.96$ 4.44%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
217
Academy for Science and Health Professions Campus Goals Dr. Mike Papadimitriou, Headmaster
GOAL 1: The Academy for Science and Health Professions will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement; all subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 100% of All ASHP students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR; STAAR A; STAAR Alternate, STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in EOC English, EOC Algebra, EOC Biology, and EOC US History. 2. Reading and Math: will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in SAT, ACT, AP, Algebra 1. 3. Science will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in ACT, AP. 4. Social Studies will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in AP.
Index 2: Student Progress; Reading, Math, and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups, ELL, Sp Ed; weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading, Writing, and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 33. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA, Writing, and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading, Writing, and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps; all subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the previous year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) 100% of ASHP Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (AA and Hisp.) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 55. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post-Secondary Readiness Post-secondary Readiness Standard: 100% ASHP students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas. 4-Year/5-Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate 100% of ASHP students (all students, Sp.Ed., ELL students, and 7 race/ethnic groups) will graduate on the four-year or five-year graduation plan. 4-Year/5-Year Longitudinal RHSP/DAP Rate 100% of ASHP students (all students and 7 race/ethnic groups) will graduate on the RHSP/DAP Plan. Post-secondary Indicator Score (college-ready graduates) 100% of ASHP students (all students, Sp. Ed., ELL students, and 7 race/ethnic groups) will meet or exceed the TSI criteria in both ELA and math on the TAKS exit-level test, SAT, or ACT. Distinctions: 1. Post-secondary Readiness Distinction HS: Performance at least 33% of indicators in top quartile.
GOAL 2: The Academy for Science and Health Professions will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: The Academy for Science and Health Professions will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: The Academy for Science and Health Professions will strive to ensure a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safe Schools.
GOAL 5: The Academy for Science and Health Prof will ensure all students and staff utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
218
Academy of Science and Health Professions2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2015-16 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
1.0 1.0 Administrators 98,384$ 102,541$ 100,372$ 103,273$ 12.41%
1.0 1.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 35,314 36,409 37,171 38,438 4.62%
- - Counselors - - - - 0.00%
- - Librarians - - - - 0.00%
- - Nurses - - - - 0.00%
7.0 7.0 Teachers 438,463 464,386 463,535 478,226 57.48%
9.0 9.0 572,161 603,336 601,078 619,937 74.52%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 76,061 121,377 113,603 118,096 14.20%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 36,350 45,261 34,139 76,196 9.16%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 1,495 1,992 1,364 1,500 0.18%
23 School Leadership 2,489 8,350 7,396 5,699 0.69%
36 Co-curricular Activities 12,456 8,113 7,132 7,346 0.88%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations - 2,500 - 3,179 0.38%
52,790 66,216 50,031 93,920 11.29%
Total Annual Operating Budget 701,012$ 790,929$ 764,712$ 831,953$ 100.00%
Enrollment 301 349 351 354
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 2,328.94$ 2,266.27$ 2,178.67$ 2,350.15$ 7.87%
*Note: The Academy of Science and Health Professions' STAAR results are included in the Conroe High School's results.
219
The Woodlands College Park High School Campus Goals & Objectives
Dr. Mark Murrell, Principal
GOAL 1: The Woodlands College Park High School will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 95% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR; STAAR A; STAAR Alternate, STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Grade 8 Science and EOC Biology, and Grade 8 Social Studies and EOC US History. Reading and Math: will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in SAT, ACT, AP, Algebra 1. Science will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in ACT, AP. Social Studies will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in AP.
Index 2: Student Progress; Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups,
ELL, Sp Ed; weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading, Writing, and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 33. Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA, Writing, and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading, Writing, and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps; all subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing
racial/ethnic groups from the previous year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (African American and Hispanic) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 59. Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance Gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post-Secondary Readiness
Postsecondary Readiness Standard: 80% for all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final Level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas.
4-Year/5-Year Longitudinal Graduation Rate 95.5% of students (all students, Sp. Ed., ELL Students, and 7 race/ethnic groups) will graduate on the four-year or five-year graduation plan.
4-Year/5-Year Longitudinal RHSP/DAP Rate 95.5% of students (all students and 7 race/ethnic groups) will graduate on the RHSP/DAP Plan.
Postsecondary Indicator Score (college-ready graduates) 83% of students (all students, Sp. Ed., ELL students, and 7 race/ethnic) will meet or exceed the TSI criteria in both ELA and math on the TAKS exit-level test, SAT, or ACT.
Distinctions Postsecondary Readiness Distinction HS: Performance at least 33% of indicators in top quartile
GOAL 2: The Woodlands College Park High School will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: The Woodlands College Park High School will work jointly with parents and the community to maximize learning for all students through two-way communication, collaborative partnerships, and unity of purpose.
Objectives: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Parent Involvement.
GOAL 4: The Woodlands College Park High School will strive to ensure a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: To provide a safe school environment for all students and staff. CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safe Schools.
GOAL 5: The Woodlands College Park High School will utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
220
The Woodlands College Park High School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
9.0 9.0 Administrators 799,935$ 838,209$ 820,254$ 815,710$ 4.62%
35.0 36.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 808,169 867,624 863,028 880,556 4.99%
11.0 11.0 Counselors 749,614 657,719 748,782 763,282 4.32%
2.0 2.0 Librarians 127,526 129,982 131,584 135,324 0.77%
1.0 1.0 Nurses 56,148 55,829 58,123 59,395 0.34%
159.0 162.0 Teachers 9,377,368 9,994,884 10,275,095 10,591,384 59.98%
217.0 221.0 11,918,760 12,544,247 12,896,866 13,245,651 75.01%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 2,185,043 2,357,762 2,408,905 2,448,927 13.87%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 529,831 554,439 404,416 582,981 3.30%
12 Instructional Resources 34,812 42,092 18,619 44,547 0.25%
13 Curriculum & Instruction 950 2,357 - 26,750 0.15%
23 School Leadership 900 7,508 2,015 7,718 0.04%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. 4,962 52,884 22,177 6,619 0.04%
33 Health Services 699 1,674 692 800 0.00%
36 Co-curricular Activities 521,000 585,860 538,830 551,057 3.12%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 675,256 613,619 577,575 742,735 4.21%
81 Facilities Acquisition & Const. - 51 - - 0.00%
1,768,410 1,860,484 1,564,324 1,963,207 11.12%
Total Annual Operating Budget 15,872,213$ 16,762,493$ 16,870,095$ 17,657,785$ 100.00%
Enrollment 2,511 2,562 2,551 2,615
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 6,321.07$ 6,542.74$ 6,613.13$ 6,752.50$ 2.11%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
221
Juvenile Detention Center Campus Goals & Objectives
Jeffery Eldridge, Principal
GOAL 1: DAEP/JJAEP will maintain rigorous standards of achievement to prepare students for graduation and post secondary success. Master rigorous academic standards; close performance gap; and successful completion of high school.
Index 1: Student Achievement
All subjects; all students; % met Level II standard 90% of All students combined over all subject areas will meet Level II performance standard in STAAR; STAAR A; STAAR Alternate, STAAR L by the 2017-2018 school year. Distinctions: 1. Will meet AADD indicator for performance (Level III) in Reading/ELA, Writing, Math, Grade 8 Science and EOC Biology, and Grade 8 Social Studies and EOC US History. 2. Reading and Math: will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in SAT, ACT, AP, Algebra 1.
3. Science will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in ACT, AP. 4. Social Studies will meet AADD indicators for performance and participation in AP.
Index 2: Student Progress; Reading, Math and Writing; all students, 7 racial/ethnic groups,
ELL, Sp Ed; weighted progress Ten student groups (All, African American, American Indian, Asian, Hispanic, Pacific Islander, White, and 2 or more races), Students with Disabilities and ELLs will meet student progress measures (weighted progress) in Reading, Writing, and Math, earning an Index 2 score of 90%.
Distinctions: 1. Will meet Top 25% Student Progress Distinction in Reading/ELA, Writing, and Math. 2. Will meet AADD indicator for greater than expected growth in Reading, Writing, and Math.
Index 3: Closing Performance Gaps; all subjects; eco dis and 2 lowest performing
racial/ethnic groups from the previous year; weighted performance (Level II and Level III) Economically Disadvantaged students and 2 lowest performing racial/ethnic groups from the prior year (2014 and 2015) will meet the weighted performance Level II and III, earning an Index 3 score of 25.
Distinctions: Will meet Top 25% Closing Performance gaps Distinction in Reading/ELA and Math.
Index 4: Post-Secondary Readiness
Post-secondary Readiness Standard 90% all students and 7 race/ethnic groups will meet final Level II standard on two or more tests combined over all subject areas.
Distinctions: 1. Post-secondary Readiness Distinction HS: Performance at least 33% of indicators in top quartile
Additional AADD Indicators: Increase Attendance Rate from 90% to 92%.
GOAL 2: DAEP/JJAEP will employ, develop, and retain highly qualified staff to maximize learning for all students.
Objective: To recruit, retain, and develop highly qualified teachers and staff for all students.
GOAL 3: DAEP/JJAEP will work jointly with parents and Montgomery County staff to ensure a collaborative partnership while their child is assigned to DAEP/JJAEP.
Objective: To enhance communication, collaboration, and involvement among the staff, parents, and community to support the students of DAEP/JJAEP.
GOAL 4: DAEP/JJAEP will strive to ensure a safe and orderly environment conducive to learning for all students and staff.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Safe Schools.
GOAL 5: DAEP/JJAEP will utilize technology to maximize learning for all students and to enhance the educational practices of teachers.
Objective: CASE: will achieve a CASE rating of Exemplary in Technology.
222
Juvenile Detention Center2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
- - Administrators -$ -$ -$ -$ 0.00%
2.0 2.0 Paraprofessionals / Aides 33,214 38,774 39,805 40,527 9.15%
- - Counselors 50,346 56,431 - - 0.00%
- - Librarians - - - - 0.00%
- - Nurses - - - - 0.00%
5.2 5.2 Teachers 289,943 315,398 303,035 318,476 71.90%
7.2 7.2 373,503 410,603 342,840 359,003 81.05%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 77,390 90,038 68,682 71,932 16.24%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction - 683 - 993 0.22%
31 Guidance, Counseling & Eval. - 300 - 200 0.05%
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 6,054 10,200 10,793 10,809 2.44%
6,054 11,183 10,793 12,002 2.71%
Total Annual Operating Budget 456,947$ 511,824$ 422,315$ 442,937$ 100.00%
Enrollment 21 22 27 25
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 21,759.38$ 23,264.73$ 15,641.30$ 17,717.48$ 13.27%
***Note: For STAAR Testing Results, please refer to the Texas Education Agency 2016 Accountability Summaries by campus located in the
Information Section under Performance Measures.
223
Summer School2016-2017 General Fund Budget
Payroll cost: By position
Budgeted Staff Actual Amended Budget Projected Proposed Budget % of
2015-16 2016-17 2014-2015 2015-2016 2015-2016 2016-2017 Total
- - Administrators 30,975$ 52,000$ 41,025$ 39,000$ 3.69%
- - Paraprofessionals / Aides 85,006 - 49,060 - 0.00%
- - Counselors 9,413 13,500 13,000 14,000 1.32%
- - Librarians 4,600 8,500 4,600 6,500 0.61%
- - Nurses 16,855 20,000 20,205 21,000 1.99%
- - Teachers 639,379 893,086 622,229 901,150 85.23%
- - 786,228 987,086 750,119 981,650 92.84%
Payroll related and benefits costs: 17,267 - 17,207 - 0.00%
Non-payroll cost: By functional area
11 Instruction 44,517 62,900 50,578 75,700 7.16%
44,517 62,900 50,578 75,700 7.16%
Total Annual Operating Budget 848,012$ 1,049,986$ 817,904$ 1,057,350$ 100.00%
Enrollment 56,392 57,792 58,239 59,639
Total Annual Operating Cost per Student 15.04$ 18.17$ 14.04$ 17.73$ 26.24%
**Note: Summer School does not include budgeted staff due to the fact that all payroll consists of extra duty pay for current staff
members included at the campuses.
224
Financial Section Debt Service Fund
Debt Service Fund
Debt Service Fund Overview
The Debt Service Fund accounts for payments of principal, interest, and related fees on the District’s general obligation bonds. Under Texas law, only these debt service payments can be charged to this fund. The Debt Service Fund is funded by a designated allocation of the property tax rate.
During fiscal year 2015-2016, the district passed a $487,000,000 bond referendum. Subsequently, the District has issued $135,000,000 of these bonds. The bonds will be used to build several new schools, major classroom renovations, safety and security upgrades, CTE upgrades and the addition of two robotics labs at the high school level.
Debt Service Policy
The Board of Directors may obtain funds to construct, acquire or equip school buildings, to purchase necessary sites, to purchase school buses, or to acquire, or refinance property financed under a contract entered under the Public Property Finance Act by issuing bonds and assessing annual ad valorem taxes sufficient to pay the principal and interest on the bonds as they come due. Before issuing bonds, the District must demonstrate to the Attorney General that, with respect to the proposed issuance, the District has a projected ability to pay the principal of and interest on the proposed bonds and all previously issued bond.
The District has adopted the provisions of section 45 of the Texas Education Code requiring the levy each year of a tax rate, unlimited as to amount, sufficient to meet principal and interest requirements during the fiscal year. Resources from the property taxes for servicing bonded debt principal and interest are accumulated in, and expended from the Debt Service Fund (Article 278e-1, VCS). Texas statutes do not prescribe a debt limit; however, a practical economic debt limit of 10% of the assessed valuation is represented in the chart below.
Computation of Legal Debt Margin
Assessed Value $32,423,298,323 Debt Limit (Percent of 16-17 School Year Assessed Value) 10% Maximum Legal Debt 3,242,329,832
Amount of Debt Applicable to Debt Limit:
Total Bonded Debt $ 1,002,210,000 Less Reserve for Retirement of Bonded Debt 32,997,945
Total Amount of Debt Applicable to Debt Limit 969,212,055
Legal Debt Margin $ 2,273,117,777
225
Debt Service Expenditures The current year expenditure budget consists of the following amounts: $40,185,000 for bond principal payments and $47,892,713 for bond interest and fee payments. Total 2016-17 budgeted expenditures for the Debt Service Fund are $88,077,713. Detailed debt service requirements are located within this section of the budget document.
- 10,000,000 20,000,000 30,000,000 40,000,000 50,000,000 60,000,000 70,000,000 80,000,000 90,000,000
100,000,000
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Debt Service Expenditures
Interest & fees Principal
226
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Actual Actual Actual Projected Budgeted
Revenues
Local sources 55,738,529$ 58,769,452$ 65,018,299$ 71,447,109$ 77,915,916$
State sources - - - 1,555,365 1,547,762
Total Revenues 55,738,529 58,769,452 65,018,299 73,002,474 79,463,678
Expenditures
Debt Service:
Principal 31,975,000 33,865,000 36,635,000 37,800,000 40,185,000
Interest & fees 45,756,528 45,583,606 45,785,693 46,433,299 47,892,713
Total Expenditures 77,731,528 79,448,606 82,420,693 84,233,299 88,077,713
Revenues Over (Under) (21,992,999) (20,679,154) (17,402,394) (11,230,825) (8,614,035)
Expenditures
Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Operating transfers 16,000,000 16,000,000 16,000,000 10,000,000 -
Proceeds from refunding bonds 169,495,561 41,426,310 259,086,992 29,087,195 -
Payment to refunding bond agent (169,770,130) (41,668,197) (259,169,776) (28,766,110) -
Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) 15,725,431 15,758,113 15,917,216 10,321,085 -
Revenues and Other Sources
Over (Under) Expenditures (6,267,568) (4,921,041) (1,485,178) (909,740) (8,614,035)
Fund Balances, beginning 46,581,472 40,313,904 35,392,863 33,907,685 32,997,945
Fund Balances, ending 40,313,904$ 35,392,863$ 33,907,685$ 32,997,945$ 24,383,910$
Debt Service Fund
Five Year Summary of Revenues and Expenditures
$-
$20,000,000
$40,000,000
$60,000,000
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Fund Balance
227
2015-16
2014-15 Amended 2015-16 2016-17 Percent
Actual Budget Projected Budgeted of Total
Revenues
Local sources 65,018,299$ 71,716,982$ 71,447,109$ 77,915,916$ 98.05%
State Sources - - 1,555,365 1,547,762 1.95%
Total Revenues 65,018,299 71,716,982 73,002,474 79,463,678 100.00%
Expenditures by object
Debt Service 82,420,693 84,242,150 84,233,299 88,077,713 100.00%
Total Expenditures 82,420,693 84,242,150 84,233,299 88,077,713 100.00%
Exess of Revenues Over
(Under) Expenditures (17,402,394)$ (12,525,168)$ (11,230,825)$ (8,614,035)$
Debt Service Fund
Budget Summary: 2016-17
Revenue & Expenditure Summary by Major Object
228
Year Ended Percent
August 31 Principal Interest Total Retired
2017 40,185,000 46,892,713 87,077,713 5.64%
2018 41,920,000 45,153,213 87,073,213 11.27%
2019 43,770,000 43,303,194 87,073,194 16.91%
2020 45,710,000 41,369,875 87,079,875 22.54%
2021 47,795,000 39,283,981 87,078,981 28.18%
2022 48,855,000 37,064,725 85,919,725 33.74%
2023 51,265,000 34,657,888 85,922,888 39.30%
2024 53,845,000 32,077,584 85,922,584 44.86%
2025 56,540,000 29,378,756 85,918,756 50.42%
2026 59,335,000 26,584,844 85,919,844 55.98%
2027 62,145,000 23,777,631 85,922,631 61.54%
2028 64,900,000 21,018,356 85,918,356 67.10%
2029 67,720,000 18,200,481 85,920,481 72.67%
2030 70,795,000 15,127,053 85,922,053 78.23%
2031 41,325,000 12,520,103 53,845,103 81.71%
2032 43,380,000 10,469,875 53,849,875 85.20%
2033 45,550,000 8,298,278 53,848,278 88.68%
2034 47,740,000 6,108,034 53,848,034 92.17%
2035 49,925,000 3,922,178 53,847,178 95.65%
2036 10,630,000 2,567,275 13,197,275 96.51%
2037 11,160,000 2,035,900 13,195,900 97.36%
2038 11,735,000 1,463,525 13,198,525 98.21%
2039 12,335,000 861,775 13,196,775 99.07%
2040 6,780,000 417,800 7,197,800 99.53%
2041 7,055,000 141,100 7,196,100 100.00%
1,042,395,000 502,696,138 1,545,091,138
Represents payment obligations of both principal and interest by year until all outstanding debt is paid in full.
Debt Retirement Summary
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
2017 2020 2025 2030 2035 2041
Percent of Debt Retired by Year
229
Original Amount Issued
Interest Issue Outstanding Current
Description Rate Amount Aug 31, 2015 Year
Unlimited Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2004B 3.40-3.50% 43,862,645 30,990,000 -
Unlimited Tax Schoolhouse Bonds, Series 2006 4.00-5.00% 120,775,000 31,720,000 -
Unlimited Tax Schoolhouse Bonds, Series 2006 01 4.25-4.30% 4,615,000 890,000 -
Unlimited Tax Schoolhouse Bonds, Series 2008 3.00-5.25% 84,885,000 1,505,000 -
Unlimited Tax Schoolhouse Bonds, Series 2009A 2.00-5.75% 83,805,000 3,810,000 -
Unlimited Tax Schoolhouse Bonds, Series 2009B 2.25-5.00% 17,880,000 13,265,000 -
Unlimited Tax Schoolhouse Bonds, Series 2010 2.00-4.50% 26,865,000 24,540,000 -
Unlimited Tax Schoolhouse Bonds, Series 2011 2.00-5.25% 82,410,000 78,795,000 -
Unlimited Tax Schoolhouse Bonds, Series 2011 REF 3.00-5.00% 130,970,000 129,345,000 -
Unlimited Tax Schoolhouse Bonds, Series 2011 REF1 2.00-3.625% 2,645,000 2,645,000 -
Unlimited Tax Schoolhouse Bonds, Series 2012 REF 2.00-5.00% 123,280,000 116,720,000 -
Unlimited Tax Schoolhouse Bonds, Series 2012 REF1 4.00% 2,530,000 2,530,000 -
Unlimited Tax Schoolhouse Bonds, Series 2012A REF 2.00-5.00% 161,045,000 150,780,000 -
Unlimited Tax Schoolhouse Bonds, Series 2012A REF1 2.00-4.00% 44,170,000 41,170,000 -
Unlimited Tax Schoolhouse Bonds, Series 2014 2.00-5.00% 76,920,000 74,675,000 -
Unlimited Tax Schoolhouse Bonds, Series 2014A 2.00-5.00% 129,205,000 128,325,000 -
Unlimited Tax Schoolhouse Bonds, Series 2014B 2.00-5.00% 21,085,000 20,890,000 -
Unlimited Tax Schoolhouse Bonds, Series 2015 2.00-5.00% 117,665,000 117,665,000 -
Unlimited Tax Schoolhouse Bonds, Series 2016 2.00-5.00% 138,015,000 - 138,015,000
Total General Obligation Bonds 1,412,627,645 970,260,000 138,015,000
DEBT SERVICE FUND
Bond Schedule
For Fiscal Year 2016-2017
230
Retired/
Refunded Amount Interest Requirements Sept 1, 2018
Current Outstanding Current Year Ending August 31, 2017 Year Ending August 31, 2018 Interest
Year Aug 31, 2016 Year Principal Interest Principal Interest To Maturity
3,690,000 27,300,000 1,031,625 3,715,000 929,775 3,730,000 818,100 1,191,675
31,720,000 - 113,250 - - - - -
890,000 - - - - - - -
735,000 770,000 45,500 770,000 15,400 - - -
1,225,000 2,585,000 113,669 1,270,000 71,537 1,315,000 24,657 -
1,720,000 11,545,000 459,588 1,710,000 408,138 1,705,000 354,781 457,987
675,000 23,865,000 1,014,844 675,000 987,844 685,000 958,931 9,934,472
1,210,000 77,585,000 3,881,675 1,240,000 3,851,050 1,285,000 3,803,425 41,049,350
3,825,000 125,520,000 6,272,075 6,130,000 6,092,100 12,560,000 5,655,500 21,508,000
650,000 1,995,000 54,981 575,000 42,731 375,000 33,232 106,822
2,610,000 114,110,000 5,514,050 2,745,000 5,380,175 2,855,000 5,268,725 47,966,950
- 2,530,000 101,200 - 101,200 - 101,200 1,276,200
5,740,000 145,040,000 7,169,300 7,845,000 6,858,375 4,840,000 6,541,250 59,892,575
- 41,170,000 1,223,400 - 1,223,400 - 1,223,400 12,030,700
4,070,000 70,605,000 3,556,650 605,000 3,445,825 625,000 3,430,500 32,285,525
6,430,000 121,895,000 5,310,562 9,885,000 5,016,412 8,165,000 4,614,587 35,936,857
525,000 20,365,000 772,400 660,000 760,550 740,000 746,550 6,390,075
165,000 117,500,000 5,132,500 170,000 5,129,150 175,000 5,125,700 60,721,550
- 138,015,000 3,574,881 2,190,000 6,579,050 2,865,000 6,452,675 79,901,475
65,880,000 1,042,395,000 45,342,150 40,185,000 46,892,712 41,920,000 45,153,213 410,650,213
231
Conroe Independent School District
Debt Service Requirments Until Maturity
August 31, 2016
Year Ended
August 31 Principal Interest
2017 40,185,000 46,892,713
2018 41,920,000 45,153,213
2019 43,770,000 43,303,194
2020 45,710,000 41,369,875
2021 47,795,000 39,283,981
2022 48,855,000 37,064,725
2023 51,265,000 34,657,888
2024 53,845,000 32,077,584
2025 56,540,000 29,378,756
2026 59,335,000 26,584,844
2027 62,145,000 23,777,631
2028 64,900,000 21,018,356
2029 67,720,000 18,200,481
2030 70,795,000 15,127,053
2031 41,325,000 12,520,103
2032 43,380,000 10,469,875
2033 45,550,000 8,298,278
2034 47,740,000 6,108,034
2035 49,925,000 3,922,178
2036 10,630,000 2,567,275
2037 11,160,000 2,035,900
2038 11,735,000 1,463,525
2039 12,335,000 861,775
2040 6,780,000 417,800
2041 7,055,000 141,100
1,042,395,000 502,696,138
Principal, 9/1/15 970,260,000
Principal payments (37,800,000)
Debt refunded (28,080,000)
Principal Issued New 138,015,000
Total Principal, 8/31/16 1,042,395,000
Current Interest Bonds
0
10,000,000
20,000,000
30,000,000
40,000,000
50,000,000
60,000,000
70,000,000
80,000,000
90,000,000
100,000,000
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
Debt Service Requirements Until Maturity
Interest Principal
232
2009
Face Amounts Interest Total Face Amounts Interest Total Face Amounts Interest Total
2017 3,715,000.00 929,775.00 4,644,775.00 770,000.00 15,400.00 785,400.00 1,270,000.00 71,537.50 1,341,537.50
2018 3,730,000.00 818,100.00 4,548,100.00 - - - 1,315,000.00 24,656.25 1,339,656.25
2019 6,410,000.00 649,975.00 7,059,975.00 - - - - - -
2020 6,625,000.00 405,300.00 7,030,300.00 - - - - - -
2021 6,820,000.00 136,400.00 6,956,400.00 - - - - - -
2022 - - - - - - - - -
2023 - - - - - - - - -
2024 - - - - - - - - -
2025 - - - - - - - - -
2026 - - - - - - - - -
2027 - - - - - - - - -
2028 - - - - - - - - -
2029 - - - - - - - - -
2030 - - - - - - - - -
2031 - - - - - - - - -
2032 - - - - - - - - -
2033 - - - - - - - - -
2034 - - - - - - - - -
2035 - - - - - - - - -
2036 - - - - - - - - -
2037 - - - - - - - - -
2038 - - - - - - - - -
2039 - - - - - - - - -
27,300,000.00 2,939,550.00 30,239,550.00 770,000.00 15,400.00 785,400.00 2,585,000.00 96,193.75 2,681,193.75
2009 B 2010 2011 A
Face Amounts Interest Total Face Amounts Interest Total Face Amounts Interest Total
2017 1,710,000.00 408,137.50 2,118,137.50 675,000.00 987,843.76 1,662,843.76 1,240,000.00 3,851,050.00 5,091,050.00
2018 1,705,000.00 354,781.25 2,059,781.25 685,000.00 958,931.26 1,643,931.26 1,285,000.00 3,803,425.00 5,088,425.00
2019 2,610,000.00 261,825.00 2,871,825.00 710,000.00 927,543.76 1,637,543.76 1,350,000.00 3,737,550.00 5,087,550.00
2020 2,820,000.00 147,225.00 2,967,225.00 760,000.00 894,468.76 1,654,468.76 1,425,000.00 3,668,175.00 5,093,175.00
2021 2,700,000.00 48,937.50 2,748,937.50 825,000.00 860,868.76 1,685,868.76 1,495,000.00 3,595,175.00 5,090,175.00
2022 - - - 780,000.00 828,768.76 1,608,768.76 2,560,000.00 3,493,800.00 6,053,800.00
2023 - - - 815,000.00 796,868.76 1,611,868.76 2,685,000.00 3,362,675.00 6,047,675.00
2024 - - - 845,000.00 763,668.76 1,608,668.76 2,830,000.00 3,224,800.00 6,054,800.00
2025 - - - 825,000.00 730,268.76 1,555,268.76 3,015,000.00 3,078,675.00 6,093,675.00
2026 - - - 885,000.00 696,068.76 1,581,068.76 2,860,000.00 2,931,800.00 5,791,800.00
2027 - - - 1,345,000.00 651,468.76 1,996,468.76 5,040,000.00 2,734,300.00 7,774,300.00
2028 - - - 1,395,000.00 596,668.76 1,991,668.76 5,300,000.00 2,475,800.00 7,775,800.00
2029 - - - 1,455,000.00 539,668.76 1,994,668.76 5,570,000.00 2,204,050.00 7,774,050.00
2030 - - - 1,515,000.00 479,321.88 1,994,321.88 5,855,000.00 1,918,425.00 7,773,425.00
2031 - - - 1,895,000.00 408,990.63 2,303,990.63 6,320,000.00 1,621,950.00 7,941,950.00
2032 - - - 1,980,000.00 326,593.76 2,306,593.76 6,640,000.00 1,297,550.00 7,937,550.00
2033 - - - 2,065,000.00 238,109.38 2,303,109.38 7,000,000.00 939,500.00 7,939,500.00
2034 - - - 2,155,000.00 145,796.88 2,300,796.88 7,370,000.00 571,500.00 7,941,500.00
2035 - - - 2,255,000.00 49,328.13 2,304,328.13 7,745,000.00 193,625.00 7,938,625.00
2036 - - - - - - - - -
2037 - - - - - - - - -
2038 - - - - - - - - -
2039 - - - - - - - - -
11,545,000.00 1,220,906.25 12,765,906.25 23,865,000.00 11,881,247.04 35,746,247.04 77,585,000.00 48,703,825.00 126,288,825.00
2004 B 2008
233
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2011 B 2011 C 2012
Face Amounts Interest Total Face Amounts Interest Total Face Amounts Interest Total
6,130,000.00 6,092,100.00 12,222,100.00 575,000.00 42,731.26 617,731.26 2,745,000.00 5,380,175.00 8,125,175.00
12,560,000.00 5,655,500.00 18,215,500.00 375,000.00 33,231.26 408,231.26 2,855,000.00 5,268,725.00 8,123,725.00
13,100,000.00 5,014,000.00 18,114,000.00 215,000.00 27,062.51 242,062.51 2,940,000.00 5,181,800.00 8,121,800.00
11,430,000.00 4,400,750.00 15,830,750.00 380,000.00 19,893.76 399,893.76 3,025,000.00 5,092,325.00 8,117,325.00
8,495,000.00 3,902,625.00 12,397,625.00 75,000.00 14,112.51 89,112.51 3,145,000.00 4,968,325.00 8,113,325.00
18,110,000.00 3,237,500.00 21,347,500.00 20,000.00 12,781.26 32,781.26 3,290,000.00 4,807,450.00 8,097,450.00
15,440,000.00 2,398,750.00 17,838,750.00 - 12,481.26 12,481.26 6,690,000.00 4,557,950.00 11,247,950.00
19,675,000.00 1,520,875.00 21,195,875.00 55,000.00 11,553.13 66,553.13 7,400,000.00 4,205,700.00 11,605,700.00
10,200,000.00 774,000.00 10,974,000.00 200,000.00 7,125.00 207,125.00 17,780,000.00 3,576,200.00 21,356,200.00
10,380,000.00 259,500.00 10,639,500.00 100,000.00 1,812.50 101,812.50 18,815,000.00 2,661,325.00 21,476,325.00
- - - - - - 2,270,000.00 2,145,550.00 4,415,550.00
- - - - - - 2,360,000.00 2,052,950.00 4,412,950.00
- - - - - - 1,700,000.00 1,980,250.00 3,680,250.00
- - - - - - 2,550,000.00 1,891,000.00 4,441,000.00
- - - - - - 6,930,000.00 1,654,000.00 8,584,000.00
- - - - - - 5,500,000.00 1,343,250.00 6,843,250.00
- - - - - - 7,640,000.00 1,014,750.00 8,654,750.00
- - - - - - 8,030,000.00 623,000.00 8,653,000.00
- - - - - - 8,445,000.00 211,125.00 8,656,125.00
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
125,520,000.00 33,255,600.00 158,775,600.00 1,995,000.00 182,784.45 2,177,784.45 114,110,000.00 58,615,850.00 172,725,850.00
2012 REF 2012 A 2012 A REF-1
Face Amounts Interest Total Face Amounts Interest Total Face Amounts Interest Total
- 101,200.00 101,200.00 7,845,000.00 6,858,375.00 14,703,375.00 - 1,223,400.00 1,223,400.00
- 101,200.00 101,200.00 4,840,000.00 6,541,250.00 11,381,250.00 - 1,223,400.00 1,223,400.00
- 101,200.00 101,200.00 1,000,000.00 6,395,250.00 7,395,250.00 695,000.00 1,216,450.00 1,911,450.00
- 101,200.00 101,200.00 1,845,000.00 6,333,350.00 8,178,350.00 - 1,209,500.00 1,209,500.00
- 101,200.00 101,200.00 1,535,000.00 6,265,750.00 7,800,750.00 475,000.00 1,204,750.00 1,679,750.00
- 101,200.00 101,200.00 8,485,000.00 6,065,350.00 14,550,350.00 - 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00
- 101,200.00 101,200.00 8,625,000.00 5,680,025.00 14,305,025.00 - 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00
- 101,200.00 101,200.00 5,530,000.00 5,326,150.00 10,856,150.00 - 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00
- 101,200.00 101,200.00 5,710,000.00 5,045,150.00 10,755,150.00 - 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00
- 101,200.00 101,200.00 5,905,000.00 4,754,775.00 10,659,775.00 - 1,200,000.00 1,200,000.00
- 101,200.00 101,200.00 16,230,000.00 4,201,400.00 20,431,400.00 10,000,000.00 1,050,000.00 11,050,000.00
- 101,200.00 101,200.00 17,540,000.00 3,357,150.00 20,897,150.00 10,000,000.00 750,000.00 10,750,000.00
750,000.00 86,200.00 836,200.00 18,910,000.00 2,445,900.00 21,355,900.00 10,000,000.00 450,000.00 10,450,000.00
- 71,200.00 71,200.00 20,365,000.00 1,464,025.00 21,829,025.00 10,000,000.00 150,000.00 10,150,000.00
- 71,200.00 71,200.00 3,765,000.00 879,600.00 4,644,600.00 - - -
1,780,000.00 35,600.00 1,815,600.00 3,940,000.00 705,800.00 4,645,800.00 - - -
- - - 4,120,000.00 524,900.00 4,644,900.00 - - -
- - - 4,315,000.00 334,625.00 4,649,625.00 - - -
- - - 4,535,000.00 113,375.00 4,648,375.00 - - -
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
2,530,000.00 1,478,600.00 4,008,600.00 145,040,000.00 73,292,200.00 218,332,200.00 41,170,000.00 14,477,500.00 55,647,500.00
234
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2014 2014A 2014A-1
Face Amounts Interest Total Face Amounts Interest Total Face Amounts Interest Total
605,000.00 3,445,825.00 4,050,825.00 9,885,000.00 4,721,412.50 14,606,412.50 - 280,000.00 280,000.00
625,000.00 3,430,500.00 4,055,500.00 8,165,000.00 4,319,587.50 12,484,587.50 - 280,000.00 280,000.00
630,000.00 3,417,950.00 4,047,950.00 8,310,000.00 3,949,262.50 12,259,262.50 - 280,000.00 280,000.00
2,600,000.00 3,346,650.00 5,946,650.00 8,780,000.00 3,563,562.50 12,343,562.50 - 280,000.00 280,000.00
7,620,000.00 3,091,150.00 10,711,150.00 8,325,000.00 3,177,562.50 11,502,562.50 - 280,000.00 280,000.00
3,845,000.00 2,804,525.00 6,649,525.00 4,050,000.00 2,909,812.50 6,959,812.50 - 280,000.00 280,000.00
4,450,000.00 2,597,150.00 7,047,150.00 2,645,000.00 2,742,437.50 5,387,437.50 1,600,000.00 248,000.00 1,848,000.00
4,445,000.00 2,374,775.00 6,819,775.00 4,010,000.00 2,576,062.50 6,586,062.50 450,000.00 207,000.00 657,000.00
4,945,000.00 2,140,025.00 7,085,025.00 4,740,000.00 2,381,012.50 7,121,012.50 - 198,000.00 198,000.00
5,705,000.00 1,873,775.00 7,578,775.00 4,940,000.00 2,187,412.50 7,127,412.50 - 198,000.00 198,000.00
6,780,000.00 1,561,650.00 8,341,650.00 5,875,000.00 1,941,737.50 7,816,737.50 - 198,000.00 198,000.00
1,780,000.00 1,347,650.00 3,127,650.00 11,470,000.00 1,565,462.50 13,035,462.50 - 198,000.00 198,000.00
1,870,000.00 1,256,400.00 3,126,400.00 6,150,000.00 1,213,062.50 7,363,062.50 5,280,000.00 99,000.00 5,379,000.00
1,965,000.00 1,160,525.00 3,125,525.00 6,695,000.00 964,531.25 7,659,531.25 - - -
2,105,000.00 1,058,775.00 3,163,775.00 2,010,000.00 801,312.50 2,811,312.50 - - -
2,215,000.00 950,775.00 3,165,775.00 2,085,000.00 724,531.25 2,809,531.25 - - -
2,330,000.00 837,150.00 3,167,150.00 2,165,000.00 644,843.75 2,809,843.75 - - -
2,445,000.00 717,775.00 3,162,775.00 2,250,000.00 562,062.50 2,812,062.50 - - -
2,560,000.00 605,450.00 3,165,450.00 2,330,000.00 476,187.50 2,806,187.50 - - -
2,565,000.00 490,125.00 3,055,125.00 2,140,000.00 392,375.00 2,532,375.00 - - -
2,700,000.00 358,500.00 3,058,500.00 2,230,000.00 296,500.00 2,526,500.00 - - -
2,835,000.00 220,125.00 3,055,125.00 2,350,000.00 182,000.00 2,532,000.00 - - -
2,985,000.00 74,625.00 3,059,625.00 2,465,000.00 61,625.00 2,526,625.00 - - -
70,605,000.00 39,161,850.00 109,766,850.00 114,065,000.00 42,354,356.25 156,419,356.25 7,330,000.00 3,026,000.00 10,356,000.00
2014A-2 2014B 2015A
Face Amounts Interest Total Face Amounts Interest Total Face Amounts Interest Total
- 15,000.00 15,000.00 660,000.00 760,550.00 1,420,550.00 170,000.00 5,088,650.00 5,258,650.00
- 15,000.00 15,000.00 740,000.00 746,550.00 1,486,550.00 175,000.00 5,085,200.00 5,260,200.00
- 15,000.00 15,000.00 720,000.00 731,950.00 1,451,950.00 1,225,000.00 5,071,200.00 6,296,200.00
- 15,000.00 15,000.00 700,000.00 714,250.00 1,414,250.00 1,565,000.00 5,043,300.00 6,608,300.00
- 15,000.00 15,000.00 680,000.00 693,550.00 1,373,550.00 1,625,000.00 4,987,025.00 6,612,025.00
- 15,000.00 15,000.00 715,000.00 672,625.00 1,387,625.00 2,995,000.00 4,893,987.50 7,888,987.50
- 15,000.00 15,000.00 795,000.00 649,975.00 1,444,975.00 3,130,000.00 4,763,325.00 7,893,325.00
- 15,000.00 15,000.00 800,000.00 626,050.00 1,426,050.00 2,275,000.00 4,628,200.00 6,903,200.00
- 15,000.00 15,000.00 810,000.00 597,850.00 1,407,850.00 3,430,000.00 4,485,575.00 7,915,575.00
- 15,000.00 15,000.00 825,000.00 565,150.00 1,390,150.00 3,565,000.00 4,346,350.00 7,911,350.00
- 15,000.00 15,000.00 3,280,000.00 483,050.00 3,763,050.00 5,145,000.00 4,189,975.00 9,334,975.00
- 15,000.00 15,000.00 3,245,000.00 352,550.00 3,597,550.00 5,380,000.00 3,952,575.00 9,332,575.00
500,000.00 7,500.00 507,500.00 3,210,000.00 223,450.00 3,433,450.00 5,630,000.00 3,705,475.00 9,335,475.00
- - - 3,185,000.00 79,625.00 3,264,625.00 11,670,000.00 3,301,125.00 14,971,125.00
- - - - - - 12,385,000.00 2,699,750.00 15,084,750.00
- - - - - - 13,015,000.00 2,064,750.00 15,079,750.00
- - - - - - 13,685,000.00 1,397,250.00 15,082,250.00
- - - - - - 14,300,000.00 787,000.00 15,087,000.00
- - - - - - 14,825,000.00 259,437.50 15,084,437.50
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - - -
500,000.00 187,500.00 687,500.00 20,365,000.00 7,897,175.00 28,262,175.00 116,190,000.00 70,750,150.00 186,940,150.00
235
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2015B 2016 Grand
Face Amounts Interest Total Face Amounts Interest Total TOTAL
- 40,500.00 40,500.00 2,190,000.00 6,579,050.00 8,769,050.00 87,077,712.52
- 40,500.00 40,500.00 2,865,000.00 6,452,675.00 9,317,675.00 87,073,212.52
310,000.00 32,750.00 342,750.00 3,545,000.00 6,292,425.00 9,837,425.00 87,073,193.77
- 25,000.00 25,000.00 3,755,000.00 6,109,925.00 9,864,925.00 87,079,875.02
- 25,000.00 25,000.00 3,980,000.00 5,916,550.00 9,896,550.00 87,078,981.27
- 25,000.00 25,000.00 4,005,000.00 5,716,925.00 9,721,925.00 85,919,725.02
- 25,000.00 25,000.00 4,390,000.00 5,507,050.00 9,897,050.00 85,922,887.52
1,000,000.00 12,500.00 1,012,500.00 4,530,000.00 5,284,050.00 9,814,050.00 85,922,584.39
- - - 4,885,000.00 5,048,675.00 9,933,675.00 85,918,756.26
- - - 5,355,000.00 4,792,675.00 10,147,675.00 85,919,843.76
- - - 6,180,000.00 4,504,300.00 10,684,300.00 85,922,631.26
- - - 6,430,000.00 4,253,350.00 10,683,350.00 85,918,356.26
- - - 6,695,000.00 3,989,525.00 10,684,525.00 85,920,481.26
- - - 6,995,000.00 3,647,275.00 10,642,275.00 85,922,053.13
- - - 5,915,000.00 3,324,525.00 9,239,525.00 53,845,103.13
- - - 6,225,000.00 3,021,025.00 9,246,025.00 53,849,875.01
- - - 6,545,000.00 2,701,775.00 9,246,775.00 53,848,278.13
- - - 6,875,000.00 2,366,275.00 9,241,275.00 53,848,034.38
- - - 7,230,000.00 2,013,650.00 9,243,650.00 53,847,178.13
- - - 5,925,000.00 1,684,775.00 7,609,775.00 13,197,275.00
- - - 6,230,000.00 1,380,900.00 7,610,900.00 13,195,900.00
- - - 6,550,000.00 1,061,400.00 7,611,400.00 13,198,525.00
- - - 6,885,000.00 725,525.00 7,610,525.00 13,196,775.00
6,780,000.00 417,800.00 7,197,800.00 7,197,800.00
7,055,000.00 141,100.00 7,196,100.00 7,196,100.00
1,310,000.00 226,250.00 1,536,250.00 138,015,000.00 92,933,200.00 230,948,200.00 1,545,091,137.74
236
Financial Section Capital Projects Fund
Capital Projects Fund
Capital Projects Fund Overview
The Capital Projects Fund accounts, on a project basis, are for projects financed by the proceeds from bond issues, or for capital projects otherwise mandated to be accounted for in this fund. The district’s capital expenditure threshold is $5,000. The Capital Projects Fund utilizes the modified accrual basis of accounting.
Enrollment in CISD for the 2015-2016 school year was 58,239, enrollment for the 2016-2017 school year is estimated at 59,639, and enrollment for the 2024-2025 school year is estimated to reach 70,839 students. The district is continuing to show steady growth as indicated in the most recent demographic study completed in 2015. The Population and Survey Analysts (PASA) completed a Demographic Update for Conroe I.S.D. by studying student residential locations, potential growth, housing trends, and economic factors inherent to the District. PASA studied the expected long-term trends for the District, and created a dataset to use in planning for the next ten years. With this in mind, the CISD Board of Trustees established the 2015 CISD Facility Planning Committee for the purpose of reviewing the district’s projected growth and instructional needs for the next three to five years. The Facilities Planning Committee was also charged with making a recommendation to the Board of Trustees to address those needs while impacting the tax rate as minimally as possible.
The Facilities Planning Committee met over a three-month period and made their recommendations to the Board of Trustees at the June 16, 2015 Board of Trustees Meeting. That recommendation became the blueprint for the 2015 CISD Bond Referendum. At the August 18, 2015 Board of Trustees’ Meeting, the Board approved a $487,000,000 bond referendum. On November 3, 2015 voters approved the $487,000,000 proposition, which includes the construction of new schools and classroom additions to accommodate student growth, improvements to aged buildings to sustain capacity, funding for robotics and Career and Technical Education Facilities, and the continuation of technology and safety and security upgrades.
The patrons of CISD have traditionally been very supportive of the District’s bond referenda. This support is evidenced by the passage of the 1992, 1994, 1998, 2001, 2004, 2008 and 2015 referenda that the patrons of CISD overwhelmingly approved to build new facilities and address District needs.
Capital Projects Fund – 2015 Bond Referendum
On November 3, 2015 voters approved the 2015 CISD Bond Referendum. The projects and status of the proposition are as follows:
Proposition 1 $487,000,000
New schools: One new High School One new Junior High Schools One new Intermediate School Two new Elementary Schools
Additions and renovations: Conroe High School Renovation Knox Junior High School addition Stewart Elementary Build-out Austin Elementary Renovation
237
District Wide Improvements
Improvements are scheduled for all campuses in all feeder zones (Conroe, The Woodlands, Oak Ridge, and Caney Creek). Prioritized improvements are unique for each campus and were established based on priorities set by each campus. These improvements include but are not limited to air conditioning & heating improvements, electrical upgrades, parking expansions and ADA (Accessibility) improvements.
Ancillary Needs and Governmental Compliance Transportation needs (more buses) Technology improvements and upgrades Career & Technology Education Facilities upgrades and additions Robotics labs for Caney Creek HS and The Woodlands College Park HS Safety and security improvements Future land purchases
238
Project Description Plan Amount
Funds
Expended &
Encumbered
Estimate to
Complete
Project
Forecast
Variance
Favorable
(Unfavorable)
Expected
Completion
%
Complete
Knox JHS Addition 046 12,190,910 644,271 11,546,639 12,190,910 0 Aug 17 8%
Land Purchases 10,000,000 0 10,000,000 10,000,000 0 Aug 16 0%
Bradley Elementary (Flex 17) - 132 25,938,117 23,493,695 7,486,305 30,980,000 (5,041,883) Aug 17 28%
OR Intermediate Flex 18 - 080 27,467,730 1,482,448 25,985,282 27,467,730 0 Aug 18 1%
OR Elementary K-6 Flex 19 - 133 29,088,053 0 29,088,053 29,088,053 0 Aug 19 0%
Grand Oaks High School - 016 141,527,923 140,634,242 14,870,758 155,505,000 (13,977,077) Aug 18 21%
Conroe High School - 001 59,040,458 3,093,000 55,947,458 59,040,458 0 Aug 19 2%
Conroe New Jr. High - 055 58,374,850 0 58,374,850 58,374,850 0 Aug 19 0%
Jean Stewart Build out - 130 1,162,743 0 1,162,743 1,162,743 0 Aug 17 0%
Austin Elementary Renovation - 102 17,853,494 0 17,853,494 17,853,494 0 Aug 19 0%
Grangerland Addition *** 5,500,000 4,486,516 1,013,484 5,500,000 0 Aug 17 50%
Technology 21,651,418 2,514,537 19,136,881 21,651,418 0 Aug 19 12%
Technology *** 10,825,709 7,409,071 3,416,638 10,825,709 0 Aug 19 68%
Life Cycle - LC 40,529,775 6,690,302 33,839,473 40,529,775 0 Aug 19 17%
Priority One Projects-LC*** 10,424,290 9,747,443 676,847 10,424,290 0 Aug 16 94%
Safety and Security - SS 13,622,508 5,445,077 8,177,431 13,622,508 0 Aug 19 40%
CTE & Robotics 5,202,000 5,202,000 0 5,202,000 0 Aug 16 43%
Buses*** 6,495,425 1,012,338 5,483,087 6,495,425 0 Aug 19 16%
Totals 496,895,403 211,854,940 304,059,423 515,914,363 (19,018,960)
Contingency 23,350,021 4,331,061
Grand Total 520,245,424 520,245,424
School Bonds Authorized487,000,000
School Bonds Sold 135,000,000
Balance to Sell 352,000,000
*** Items are paid for by General
Fund Transfer33,245,424
Status of 2015 Bond Referendum & Capital Projects (As of 9/30/16)
239
Capital Projects Fund Expenditures The current year capital projects expenditure budget is $192,659,698, which is an increase of 103,987,418 from the 2015-2016 projected expenditures. This budget increase is due to the ongoing projects and start of new projects that are being funded by 2015 bond referendum. Capital Projects Fund - Fund Balance The fund balance in the Capital Projects Fund is budgeted to be 72,787,751 by the end 2016-2017.
240
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Actual Actual Actual Projected Budgeted
Revenues
Local sources 100,168$ 55,272$ 71,373$ 404,288$ 57,030$
Total Revenues 100,168 55,272 71,373 404,288 57,030
Expenditures
Plant Maintenance and Operations - 1,687,121 2,655,312 - -
Facilities Acquisition and Construction 97,264,100 64,399,607 36,040,328 88,672,280 192,659,698
Total Expenditures 97,264,100 66,086,728 38,695,640 88,672,280 192,659,698
Revenues Over (Under)
Expenditures (97,163,932) (66,031,456) (38,624,267) (88,267,992) (192,602,668)
Other Financing Sources (Uses)
Operating transfers in/(out) 7,056,151 21,300,000 4,300,000 33,300,000 -
Sale of Real Property - - 455,996 -
General Obligation Bond Proceeds 65,000,000 46,000,000 40,000,000 135,000,000 148,116,196
Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) 72,056,151 67,300,000 44,755,996 168,300,000 148,116,196
Revenues and Other Sources
Over (Under) Expenditures (25,107,781) 1,268,544 6,131,729 80,032,008 (44,486,472)
Fund Balances, beginning 54,949,723 29,841,942 31,110,486 37,242,215 117,274,223
Fund Balances, ending 29,841,942$ 31,110,486$ 37,242,215$ 117,274,223$ 72,787,751$
Capital Projects Fund
Five Year Summary of Revenues and Expenditures
- 25,000,000 50,000,000 75,000,000
100,000,000 125,000,000 150,000,000 175,000,000 200,000,000
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Expenditures
241
2015-16
2014-15 Amended 2015-16 2016-17 Percent
Actual Budget Projected Budgeted of Total
Revenues
Local sources 71,373 - 404,288 57,030 0.00%
Total Revenues 71,373 - 404,288 57,030 0.00%
Expenditures by object
Purchased & contracted services 2,834,609 488,519 453,440 20,520 0.0%
Supplies 3,540,544 4,793,822 4,329,955 1,202,611 0.6%
Capital outlay 32,320,487 262,221,503 83,888,885 191,436,567 99.4%
Total Expenditures 38,695,640 267,503,844 88,672,280 192,659,698 100.00%
Exess of Revenues Over
(Under) Expenditures (38,624,267)$ (267,503,844)$ (88,267,992)$ (192,602,668)$
Capital Projects Fund
Budget Summary: 2016-17
Revenue & Expenditure Summary by Major Object
242
Conroe Independent School District
Capital Projects Summary
Project: Knox Junior High Addition
Description: The capital projects fund is providing $12.1 million to add 10 new science classrooms
and an addition to the field house. The addition will add 26,078 square feet to the building.
Status: This project is 8% complete and has an estimated completion date of August 2017.
Operating Budget Impact: The overall impact on the budget for this addition is expected at approximately 70,000 for
custodial services and utilities.
Project: Bradley Elementary
Description: The capital projects fund is providing $25.9 million for a new elementary school. The new
125,121 square foot facility will have the capacity to service 1,000 students in the Oak Ridge feeder system.
Status: This project is 28% complete and has an estimated completion date of August 2017.
Operating Budget Impact: The overall impact on the budget for this campus, based on a projected enrollment of 800
students, is expected at approximately $3.5 million with the majority of the cost being in staffing expense of $3.1 million. The remaining expense will include cost for maintenance, custodial, utilities, and supplies.
Project: Oak Ridge Elementary- (Flex 18)
Description: The capital projects fund is providing $27.4 million for a new elementary school. The
new 125,121 square foot facility will have the capacity to service 1,000 students in the Oak Ridge feeder system.
Status: This project is 1% complete and has an estimated completion date of August 2018 .
Operating Budget Impact: The overall impact on the budget for this campus, based on a projected enrollment of 650
students, is expected at approximately $3.5 million with the majority of the cost being in staffing expense of $3.2 million. The remaining expense will include cost for maintenance, custodial, utilities, and supplies.
243
Project: Oak Ridge K-6 School- (Flex 19)
Description: The capital projects fund is providing $29 million for a new kindergarten through 6th grade
school. The new 125,121 square foot facility will have the capacity to service 1,000 students in the Oak Ridge feeder system.
Status: This project is 0% complete and has an estimated completion date of August 2019.
Operating Budget Impact: The overall impact on the budget for this campus, based on a projected enrollment of 600
students, is expected at approximately $3.1 million with the majority of the cost being in staffing expense of $2.8 million. The remaining expense will include cost for maintenance, custodial, utilities, and supplies.
Project: Grand Oaks High School
Description: The capital projects fund is providing $141.5 million for a high school. The new 522,651
square foot facility will have the capacity to service 3,000 students in the Oak Ridge feeder system.
Status: This project is 21% complete as and has an estimated completion date of August 2018.
Operating Budget Impact: The overall impact on the budget for this campus, based on a projected enrollment of
1,500 students, is expected at approximately $6.6 million with the majority of the cost being in staffing expense of $5 million. The remaining expense will include cost for maintenance, custodial, utilities, and supplies.
Project: Conroe High School classroom renovations/additions
Description: The capital projects fund is providing $59 million for renovations to mechanical systems.
This renovation will cause the loss of several classrooms. New classrooms will be built.
Status: This project is 2% complete and has an estimated completion date of August 2019.
Operating Budget Impact: The overall impact on the budget has not been determined yet.
Project: Conroe New Junior High
Description: The capital projects fund is providing $58.3 million for a new Jr. High School in the
Conroe feeder system. The new 207,000 square foot facility will have the capacity to service 1,200 students.
Status: This project is 0% complete and has an estimated completion date of August 2019. . Operating Budget Impact:
244
The overall impact on the budget for this campus, based on a projected enrollment of 1,000, is expected at approximately $3.6 million with the majority of the cost being in staffing expense of $3.1 million. The remaining expense will include cost for maintenance, custodial, utilities, and supplies.
Project: Stewart Elementary Build-out
Description: The capital projects fund is providing $1.1 million to build-out the remaining 200 seat
capacity school in the Conroe feeder system.
Status: This project is 0% complete and has an estimated completion date of August 2017.
Operating Budget Impact: The build-out includes finishing the existing interior space to provide eight classrooms.
The overall impact of the budget will be in staffing, depending on enrollment.
Project: Austin Elementary Renovation
Description: The capital projects fund is providing $17.8 million to renovate the existing structure of
the building. The capacity will not be increased.
Status: This project is 0% complete and has an estimated completion date of August 2019.
Operating Budget Impact: The overall impact on the budget for this campus is expected at approximately $100,000
for custodial and utility expenses.
Project: Grangerland Addition
Description: The capital projects fund is providing $5.5 million for the addition of eight classrooms.
Status: This project is 50% complete and has an estimated completion date of August 2017.
Operating Budget Impact: This addition is replacing portable buildings so this should have no impact on the budget.
Project: Technology/Life Cycle/Safety & Security/CTE Robotics/Transportation
Description: The capital projects fund is providing $32.4 million for technology, $50.9 million for life
cycle improvements, $13.6 million for security, $5.2 million for CTE/Robotics and $6.5 million for new buses. This funding is being used to support the District’s goals.
245
2016/2017
Enrollment Capacity Age of Building
Elementaries:
Anderson 695 800 21
Armstrong 683 770 46
Austin 945 950 63
Birnham Woods 1,154 1,000 6
Buckalew 1,162 1,000 17
Bush 660 770 19
Broadway 694 850 8
Creighton 942 770 35
David 615 700 25
Deretchin 645 1,185 10
Ford 921 900 37
Galatas 671 850 21
Giesinger 575 700 25
Glen Loch 666 600 35
Hailey 687 680 37
Houser 819 920 35
Houston 740 1,000 8
Kaufman 817 1,000 9
Lamar 671 770 44
Milam 799 1,000 9
OakRidge 690 750 42
Patterson 774 1,000 1
Powell 741 850 21
Reaves 721 730 41
Rice 613 730 37
Ride 726 660 32
Runyan 702 610 48
San Jacinto 688 850 35
Snyder 1,028 1,000 2
Stewart 666 800 1
Tough 595 1,185 13
Wilkinson 712 1,000 6Total Elementary: 24,217 27,380
Intermediates:
Bozman 793 1,000 6
Collins 711 800 25
Cox 1,320 1,000 7
Cryar 673 1,000 11
Deretchin 343 1,185 10
Grangerland 1,039 1,000 7
Mitchell 1,222 1,200 19
Stewart 145 800 1
Tough 330 1,185 13
Travis 626 700 89
Vogel 1,042 1,185 14
Wilkerson 698 730 41
Total Intermediate: 8,942 11,785
Junior Highs:
Irons 1,164 1,200 3
Knox 1,357 1,200 37
McCullough 2,236 2,300 39
Moorhead 1,066 1,100 14
Peet 1,313 1,500 2
Washington 791 750 64
York 1,220 1,500 8
Total Junior High: 9,147 9,550
High Schools:
Caney Creek 2,015 3,100 20
Conroe 2,793 3,400 53
Conroe 9th 971 1,100 20
Hauke Alternative 152 250 76
Oak Ridge 2,928 2,300 34
Oak Ridge-9th Grade Campus 1,152 1,468 30
The Woodlands 3,276 3,000 19
The Woodlands- 9th Grade Campus 1,100 1,400 15
The Woodlands College Park 2,903 2,850 10
DAEP/JJAEP 43 66
Total High School: 17,333 18,934
District Totals: 59,639 67,649
School Name
Capacity, Enrollment and Age by School
246
School Name Capacity
2016/2017
Enrollment
Elementary 27,380 24,217
Intermediate 11,785 8,942
Junior High 9,550 9,147
High School 18,934 17,333
Capacity, Enrollment by School Grade Level
- 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000
10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000
Ele
menta
ry
Inte
rmedia
te
Junio
r H
igh
Hig
h S
chool
Enrollment Compared to Capacity
Capacity
2016/2017 Enrollment
247
Conroe Independent School District
248
Financial Section Food Service Fund
Food Service Special Revenue Fund
The District’s food service operations are accounted for in the Food Service Special Revenue Fund. Although special revenue funds are generally not included in the annual budget adopted by the Board of Trustees, TEA regulations require inclusion of the food service fund.
Approximately (57%) of the revenue in this fund is received from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) under the National School Lunch Program and the School Breakfast Program. The remaining revenue (43%) is primarily generated from user fees – i.e. student payments for meals and is budgeted based on prior year actual information and projected enrollment. The Food Service revenue is budgeted to decrease by $1,090.892 or 5.7% less than the 2015-2016 projected revenues.
The following table provides a comparison of revenues by source for the 2016-2017 budget year.
Food Service expenditures consist primarily of payroll (41%) and supplies and materials (50.7%). The majority of the supplies and materials budget consists of expenditures for food. Food Service fund expenditures are budgeted at $18,000,000 a decrease of $1,287,501 or 6.6% lower than 2015-2016 projected expenditures.
It is recommended that the fund balance for Food Service not exceed approximately three months of average food service operation expenditures. The current fund balance is projected at $2,431,806 which is within these guidelines. These balances must be used exclusively for allowable child nutrition program purposes.
$2,300,000
$2,800,000
$3,300,000
$3,800,000
$4,300,000
$4,800,000
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Fund Balance
249
Child Nutrition Goals & Objectives
Robyn Hughes, Director of Child Nutrition
Mission: The Power Station will provide quality meals and service that exceed Child Nutrition guidelines, while maintaining a financially self sufficient department
GOAL 1: To increase the number of free and reduced meal applications completed by
parents online from 30% to at least 40%. This will be accomplished by educating principals and parents about the availability and benefits of online applications. The paper application, which will include information about the online process, will be sent home to students.
GOAL 2: Implement an employee incentive program to decrease kitchen review follow up
visits by 10%. GOAL 3: Decrease the number of kitchens with health inspection demerits by 10%.
250
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Actual Actual Actual Projected Budgeted
Revenues
Local sources 7,573,328$ 7,223,852$ 7,031,534$ 7,287,364$ 7,705,214$
State Sources 71,039 73,917 81,849 93,793 -
Federal sources 9,557,112 10,358,840 10,906,871 11,709,735 10,294,786
Total Revenues 17,201,479 17,656,609 18,020,254 19,090,892 18,000,000
Expenditures by function
Food service 14,219,583 17,709,366 17,473,807 17,840,912 16,566,000
Maintenance & Operations 1,304,463 1,404,329 1,449,875 1,446,589 1,434,000
Total Expenditures 15,524,046 19,113,695 18,923,682 19,287,501 18,000,000
Revenues Over (Under) 1,677,433 (1,457,086) (903,428) (196,609) -
Expenditures
Fund Balances, beginning 3,311,496 4,988,929 3,531,843 2,628,415 2,431,806
Fund Balances, ending 4,988,929$ 3,531,843$ 2,628,415$ 2,431,806$ 2,431,806$
Food Service Fund
Five Year Summary of Revenues and Expenditures
10.00%
13.00%
16.00%
19.00%
22.00%
25.00%
28.00%
31.00%
34.00%
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
$4,000,000
$4,500,000
$5,000,000
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Fund Balance as a % of Expenditures
Fund Balance % of Total Expenditures
251
2015-16
2014-15 Amended 2015-16 2016-17 Percent
Actual Budget Projected Budgeted of Total
Revenues
Local sources 7,031,534$ 7,891,497$ 7,287,364$ 7,705,214$ 42.81%
State Sources 81,849 - 93,793 -
Federal sources 10,906,871 10,393,253 11,709,735 10,294,786 57.19%
Total Revenues 18,020,254 18,284,750 19,090,892 18,000,000 100.00%
Expenditures by object
Payroll 7,237,437 7,500,000 7,479,400 7,380,000 41.0%
Purchased & contracted services 1,498,968 1,585,090 1,516,098 1,409,000 7.8%
Supplies 9,710,469 10,459,711 10,225,241 9,120,000 50.7%
Other operating expense 21,269 40,000 35,944 30,000 0.2%
Capital outlay 455,539 31,150 30,818 61,000 0.3%
Total Expenditures 18,923,682 19,615,951 19,287,501 18,000,000 100.00%
Exess of Revenues Over
(Under) Expenditures (903,428)$ (1,331,201)$ (196,609)$ -$
Food Service Fund
Budget Summary: 2016-17
Revenue & Expenditure Summary by Major Object
41.0%
7.8%50.7%
0.2% 0.3%
Expenditures by Major Object
Payroll
Purchased & contracted services
Supplies
Other operating expense
Capital outlay
252
Informational Section
Long Range Financial Forecasts
The following financial forecasts are used to determine the impact of current financial decisions on subsequent fiscal years. The models are updated, reviewed, and evaluated more by the Chief Financial Officer and Business & Accounting Managers, as circumstances change. The model used for the General and Debt Service Funds is much more detailed than the ones used for Capital Projects and Food Service Funds, since many more factors and assumptions are involved. Review and evaluation of these plans, in conjunction with the budget development process, insures that short-term financial decisions are made only after consideration of the long-term consequences.
General and Debt Service Forecasts
Revenue Sources
The general and debt service funds have two primary sources of revenue, tax collections and state funding. The collection of taxes is the primary source of revenue for both the general and debt service fund. Tax collections make up approximately 76% of the revenue for both funds. Tax revenues are increasing due to rising property values and significant growth in the district. The second source of revenue comes from state funding. State funding generates approximately 24% of the revenues for these funds. Although state funding is only 24% of the revenue budget it requires a more complex calculation to derive the amount of funding that the District will receive.
24.0%
76.0%
2016-17 Revenue Budget (General Fund & Debt Service Fund Combined)
State
Local Taxes
Expenditures
The total General Fund expenditure budget for 2016-17 is $447,580,555. This is an increase of $21,351,354 over projected 2015-16 expenditure levels. As always the majority of expenditures for the school district are personnel costs.
89.06%
5.26%4.26%
1.32%
0.12%
General Fund Expenditures by Major Object
Payroll Cost
Purchase & cont. serv.
Supplies and materials
Other operating expend
Capital outlay
253
Long Range Financial Forecasts (continued) General Fund, fund balance is projected to increase from $121.6 million in 2014-15 to $126.7 million in 2015-16. The increase in fund balance is a result of enrollment growth and steady increases in local property tax values. The District feels certain it will be able to maintain a constant and stable fund balance in the General Fund.
The Debt Service fund, current year expenditures consist of the following amounts: $40.2 million for bond principal payments and $47.9 million for bond interest and fee payments. Total 2016-17 budgeted expenditures for the Debt Service fund are $88.1. The fund balance is projected to decrease to $24.4 million in 2016-2017. The District feels comfortable that we can maintain a constant and stable fund balance for the Debt Service fund. Projection Model Following this section you will see a variety of schedules and calculations that are used by the District in projecting its revenues and expenditures for future years. The schedules for the General and Debt Service funds are listed first from pages 258-259. The financial projection summary listed on pages 258-259 is a composite of all the calculations performed on the preceding worksheets pages 260-269. The Capital Projects Fund and Food Service Fund projections are listed on pages 270-271. Additional information is provided in the remainder of this section. Throughout this model we use projected amounts for the current fiscal year (2015-16), and proposed amounts for the next budget year (2016-17) to project the subsequent three fiscal years. In addition to reviewing past trends, we also take into consideration many other factors. Further explanation of each component is listed below: Projection Model Components Summary The summary sheet is a composite of all the calculations performed on each of the other worksheets described below. The summary section of the Long-Range Plan consolidates enrollment projections, taxable value estimates, State aid estimates, and many other factors into a single comprehensive financial plan, and calculates the effect on the projected tax rate for each subsequent fiscal year. The projected tax rate in the general fund is $1.04. Under current law, the maximum tax rate a school district can have in the general fund is $1.17. The debt service summary included in the long-range projection allows for estimated increases in debt requirements due to future bond sales. The accompanying debts schedules represent only the amounts due as of September 1, 2016 since complete information is not available on future bond sales. The debt service tax rate is budgeted to remain at $.24 cents for fiscal year 2016-17.
0
20,000,000
40,000,000
60,000,000
80,000,000
100,000,000
120,000,000
140,000,000
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
General Fund Balances
254
Long Range Financial Forecasts (continued)
Assumptions The assumptions section is used to consolidate variables entered in other sections and to input other data required in the computations of future year expenditures and revenues. Many of the parameters are directly input in this section – taxable value, collection percentage, salary increases, and utility costs for new facilities. Other values, such as enrollment and ADA are linked from other worksheets.
Debt Schedule This debt requirement worksheet represents the current debt requirements as of September 1, 2016 only. The summary schedule discussed above includes amounts for anticipated new debt from future bond sales.
State Revenue Estimate Worksheets The calculations on these worksheets are based on the current state funding formula. Three of the most critical factors in estimating General Fund State aid are ADA projections, FTE’s for special education students, and taxable values. ADA figures are linked from the enrollment sheet and taxable values are linked from the assumption sheet. Special Education FTE’s are projected based on historical percentage growth rates for each instructional arrangement. The most critical factor in calculating Debt Service State aid under both the IFA and EDA programs is debt service requirements. These figures are linked from the debt schedule.
Statistics This section provides additional information concerning historical and projected statistical information for the District.
Enrollment Enrollment projections are one of the most significant factors in the budget development and long-range financial planning process. Enrollment projections are designed to predict the student enrollment of the District based on geographic data, student data, migration data, and historical data of student populations. The District uses two models to produce enrollment projections. The first method, Cohort Survival, uses historical data to project the number of students based on a survival rate. This survival rate is based on three key elements:
Progressors – Students who are promoted to the next grade level within the District
Retained – Students who are retained at their current grade within the District
Migrants – Students who are new, first time students in the District
The other model used to predict enrollment growth is Linear Regression Trend Analysis. This method uses historical data (ten years) to determine a best-fit trend line per grade level. This model projects an even growth rate based on this trend line and is very effective when growth patterns are somewhat consistent.
In addition to these statistical algorithms, we also, through the use of a comprehensive database, monitor the growth of every subdivision and apartment complex within the District. Information regarding the age and number of units, along with the number of students, allows us to develop profiles on these developments. Utilizing these profiles, we can anticipate enrollment trends of new developments as well as changes, such as renovations to aging apartment complexes. The combination of statistical trends and detailed development information allows the District to forecast trends, as well as prepare for exceptions.
255
Long Range Financial Forecasts (continued)
Capital Projects Fund
The District currently has issued $135 million of the $487million in bonds available to sell from the 2015 bond referendum. An extensive list of all projects included in the 2015 bond referendum are included in Capital Projects section of this document.
Food Service Special Revenue Fund
Forecasts for this fund are based on a revenue and expenditures per student basis for the current budget year (2016-17) and adjusted for projected increases due to inflation and growth in participation.
256
Conroe Independent School District
257
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20
Projected Budget Projected Projected Projected
General Fund
Tax Rate $1.0400 $1.0400 $1.0400 $1.0400 $1.0400
Revenues
5700 Total local revenue 314,016,139$ 325,498,681$ 351,368,842$ 369,472,897$ 388,125,613$
5800 Total state revenue 156,422,214 127,846,130 107,823,452 96,857,166 88,380,627
5900 Total federal sources 4,176,125 - - - -
5000 Total revenues 474,614,478 453,344,811 459,192,294 466,330,063 476,506,240
Expenditures
6100 Total payroll costs 379,612,244 398,566,754 414,509,424 431,089,801 448,333,393
6200 Total contracted services 23,555,684 23,543,236 24,014,101 24,494,383 24,984,270
6300 Total supplies & materials 16,564,733 19,056,675 19,437,809 19,826,565 20,223,096
6400 Total other fees 4,517,653 5,890,890 6,008,708 6,128,882 6,251,460
6600 Total capital outlay 1,978,887 523,000 750,000 750,000 750,000
Total expenditures 426,229,201 447,580,555 464,720,041 482,289,630 500,542,219
Other Financing Sources & Uses 43,300,000 - - - -
Fund Balance - Beg. of Year 121,687,592 126,772,869 132,537,125 127,009,378 111,049,810
Fund Balance - End of Year 126,772,869$ 132,537,125$ 127,009,378$ 111,049,810$ 87,013,831$
Conroe Independent School DistrictFinancial Projection: Summary
258
2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20
Projected Budget Projected Projected Projected
Debt Service FundTax Rate $0.2400 $0.2400 $0.2400 $0.2400 $0.2400
Revenues
5700 Total local revenue 71,447,109$ 77,915,916$ 82,484,871$ 86,609,114$ 90,939,570$
5800 Total state revenue 1,555,365 1,547,762 1,470,589 1,401,774 134,350
5000 Total revenues 73,002,474 79,463,678 83,955,460 88,010,888 91,073,920
Expenditures
6000 Total expenditures 84,233,299 88,077,713 88,073,213 88,073,194 88,079,875
7020 Other resources 10,321,085 - - - -
Fund Balance - Beg. of Year 33,907,685 32,997,945 24,383,910 20,266,157 20,203,851
Fund Balance - End of Year 32,997,945$ 24,383,910$ 20,266,157$ 20,203,851$ 23,197,896$
Combined Tax Rate $1.2800 $1.2800 $1.2800 $1.2800 $1.2800
Inc/(Dec) in Combined Tax Rate $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000
Conroe Independent School DistrictFinancial Projection: Summary
259
Budget Projected Projected Projected
General Funds 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20
Current - Taxable Value MCAD 29,840,409,057$ 32,423,298,323$ 34,368,696,222$ 36,087,131,033$ 37,891,487,584$
% Increase from prior year 8.63% 8.66% 6.00% 5.00% 5.00%
Collections % 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00% 100.00%
Projected Student Enrollment 58,239 59,639 61,039 62,439 63,839
Student ADA 54,147 56,061 57,377 58,693 60,009
Salary Increase 3.00% 3.00% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5%
Conroe Independent School District
Financial Projection: Assumptions
260
Year Ended Percent
August 31 Principal Interest Total Retired
2017 40,185,000 46,892,713 87,077,713 5.64%
2018 41,920,000 45,153,213 87,073,213 11.27%
2019 43,770,000 43,303,194 87,073,194 16.91%
2020 45,710,000 41,369,875 87,079,875 22.54%
2021 47,795,000 39,283,981 87,078,981 28.18%
2022 48,855,000 37,064,725 85,919,725 33.74%
2023 51,265,000 34,657,888 85,922,888 39.30%
2024 53,845,000 32,077,584 85,922,584 44.86%
2025 56,540,000 29,378,756 85,918,756 50.42%
2026 59,335,000 26,584,844 85,919,844 55.98%
2027 62,145,000 23,777,631 85,922,631 61.54%
2028 64,900,000 21,018,356 85,918,356 67.10%
2029 67,720,000 18,200,481 85,920,481 72.67%
2030 70,795,000 15,127,053 85,922,053 78.23%
2031 41,325,000 12,520,103 53,845,103 81.71%
2032 43,380,000 10,469,875 53,849,875 85.20%
2033 45,550,000 8,298,278 53,848,278 88.68%
2034 47,740,000 6,108,034 53,848,034 92.17%
2035 49,925,000 3,922,178 53,847,178 95.65%
2036 10,630,000 2,567,275 13,197,275 96.51%
2037 11,160,000 2,035,900 13,195,900 97.36%
2038 11,735,000 1,463,525 13,198,525 98.21%
2039 12,335,000 861,775 13,196,775 99.07%
2040 6,780,000 417,800 7,197,800 99.53%
2041 7,055,000 141,100 7,196,100 100.00%
1,042,395,000 502,696,138 1,545,091,138
Represents payment obligations of both principal and interest by year until all outstanding debt is paid in full.
Debt Retirement Summary
0.00%
20.00%
40.00%
60.00%
80.00%
100.00%
2017 2020 2025 2030 2035 2041
Percent of Debt Retired by Year
261
Budget Projected Projected Projected
2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20
Student Counts:
Refined ADA (PreK-12) 56,061 57,377 58,693 60,009
Projected Increase in ADA 3.53% 2.35% 2.29% 2.24%
Special Education FTEs:
Homebound 1.398 1.412 1.426 1.440
Hospital Class 2.241 2.264 2.286 2.309
Speech Therapy 87.566 88.442 89.326 90.219
Resource Room 629.914 636.213 642.575 649.001
S/C Mild/Moderate/Severe 460.848 465.456 470.111 474.812
Off Home Campus 2.144 2.166 2.187 2.209
VAC 5.655 5.712 5.769 5.826
Nonpublic contracts - - - -
Res Care & Treatment 11.305 11.418 11.532 11.647
Total Special Ed FTEs (Calculated #) 1,201.071 1,213.083 1,225.212 1,237.463
Total Weighted FTEs (Calculated #) 3,787.844 3,825.727 3,863.978 3,902.613
Career & Technology FTEs 2,277.425 2,300.200 2,323.200 2,346.400
Regular ADA (Calculated#) 52,582.504 53,863.717 55,144.588 56,425.137
Mainstream ADA 934.982 944.332 953.775 963.313
Compensatory Education Enrollment 21,933.000 22,426.000 22,650.000 22,877.000
FTEs of Pregnant Students 5.393 5.447 5.502 5.557
Bilingual ADA 7,053.707 7,124.244 7,195.486 7,267.441
G T Operational Enrollment (Max 5% of ADA) 2,803.033 2,868.833 2,934.633 3,000.433
Number of Full-time Employees(exc admin & teachers) 2,748 2,804 2,860 2,917
Number of Part-time Employees 187 191 194 198
Other Data
Tax Effort for Tier II
Current Year Tax Collections (M&O+I&S) 415,018,219 439,919,312 461,915,277 485,011,041
Prior year CPTD 29,588,708,484 32,423,298,323 34,368,696,222 36,087,131,033
Prior year ADJ CPTD 29,588,708,484 32,423,298,323 34,368,696,222 36,087,131,033
Estimated Current Year Value 32,423,298,323 34,368,696,222 36,087,131,033 37,891,487,585
Prior Year I&S Tax Collections 71,616,982 77,815,916 82,484,871 86,609,114
Current Year M&O Taxes Collected 337,202,303 357,434,441 375,306,163 394,071,471
Guaranteed Level (Tier II, Level II) 77.53 77.53 77.53 77.53
Weighted ADA (Calculated #) 69,656 71,214 72,715 74,217
IFA Debt Payment 87,077,712 87,073,213 87,073,194 87,079,875
Small/Sparse School Data:
Square Miles 348 348 348 348
Highest Grade Taught 12 12 12 12
Basic Allotment Data:
Basic Allotment 5,140 5,140 5,140 5,140
Cost of Education Index 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.16
Adjusted Basic Allotment 5,685 5,685 5,685 5,685
Conroe Independent School District
Financial Projection: State Revenues EstimatesBased on Current State Funding Formula
262
Budget Projected Projected Projected
2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20
Conroe Independent School District
Financial Projection: State Revenues EstimatesBased on Current State Funding Formula
Tier I Funding
Regular Block Grant 298,929,601$ 306,213,309$ 313,495,039$ 320,774,771$
Regular Special Education Block Grant 21,276,814 21,489,583 21,704,478 21,921,523
Mainstream 5,846,912 5,905,381 5,964,434 6,024,079
Care & Treatment Facility Student 257,074 259,645 262,241 264,864
Less Charge for District Share (267,585) (267,585) (267,585) (267,585)
Career & Technology Block Grant 17,478,671 17,653,457 17,829,992 18,008,292
Gifted & Talented Block Grant 1,912,229 1,957,118 2,002,007 2,046,895
Comp Ed Block Grant 24,937,821 25,498,407 25,753,392 26,010,920
Comp Ed Pregnant Allotment 73,894 74,633 75,379 76,138
Bilingual Education Block Grant 4,010,032 4,050,133 4,090,634 4,131,540
High School Allotment 4,470,838 4,575,789 4,680,740 4,785,691
Transportation Allotment 7,119,165 7,261,549 7,406,780 7,554,915
Total Cost of Tier I 386,045,466 394,671,419 402,997,531 411,332,043
Less: Local Share of Tier I Cost (293,904,641) (322,060,623) (341,384,260) (358,453,473)
State Share of Tier I Cost 92,140,825$ 72,610,796$ 61,613,271$ 52,878,570$
Foundation School Fund Detail
State Share of Tier I 92,140,825 72,610,796 61,613,271 52,878,570
Tier II Entitlement 12,500,995 11,280,523 10,783,642 10,512,305
Other Programs
Staff Allotment 1,404,310 1,432,133 1,460,253 1,489,752
Total Other Programs 1,404,310 1,432,133 1,460,253 1,489,752
Less Available School Fund (21,397,103) (21,751,536) (22,262,144) (22,772,752)
Total Foundation 84,649,027$ 63,571,916$ 51,595,022$ 42,107,875$
State Aid By Funding Source
Foundation School 84,649,027 63,571,916 51,595,022 42,107,875
Available School Fund-State Portion 21,397,103 21,751,536 22,262,144 22,772,752
Total State Aid 106,046,130$ 85,323,452$ 73,857,166$ 64,880,627$
263
Maintenace & Operations% State % Property % Tax Local % Total %
Year Enrollment ADA Inc Revenue Inc Value Inc Rate Revenue Inc Expenditures Inc
07/08 46,524 43,305 6% 148,680,722 82% 16,586,982,484 14% 1.030 178,308,731 -12% 296,657,102 11%
08/09 47,996 44,915 4% 137,509,327 -8% 18,355,545,962 11% 1.040 197,097,795 11% 310,880,975 5%
09/10 49,629 46,280 3% 137,429,383 0% 19,868,233,651 8% 1.040 209,308,872 6% 311,060,458 0%
10/11 51,170 47,883 3% 136,941,421 0% 20,272,987,620 2% 1.040 215,189,936 3% 313,768,706 1%
11/12 52,664 49,498 3% 126,004,383 -8% 20,990,342,459 4% 1.040 223,874,813 4% 322,453,532 3%
12/13 53,934 50,465 2% 132,085,800 5% 22,009,980,056 5% 1.040 234,580,314 5% 339,536,941 5%
13/14 55,009 51,830 3% 152,693,932 16% 23,908,871,455 9% 1.040 252,830,482 8% 368,889,550 9%
14/15 56,363 53,165 3% 154,845,838 1% 26,928,550,056 13% 1.040 284,917,123 13% 399,956,145 8%
15/16 58,239 54,147 2% 156,422,214 1% 29,840,409,057 11% 1.040 314,016,139 10% 426,229,201 7%
16/17 59,639 56,061 4% 127,846,130 -18% 32,423,298,323 9% 1.040 325,498,681 4% 447,580,555 5%
17/18 61,039 57,377 2% 107,823,452 -16% 34,368,696,222 6% 1.040 351,368,842 8% 464,720,041 4%
18/19 62,439 58,693 2% 96,857,166 -10% 36,087,131,033 5% 1.040 369,472,897 5% 482,289,630 4%
19/20 63,839 60,009 2% 88,380,627 -9% 37,891,487,584 5% 1.040 388,125,613 5% 500,542,219 4%
Debt Service
Debt % Tax Combined
Year Requirement Inc Rate Tax Rate
07/08 50,637,067 12.184% 0.2100 1.2400
08/09 55,939,473 10.471% 0.2300 1.2700
09/10 64,083,400 14.558% 0.2450 1.2850
10/11 63,860,446 -0.348% 0.2550 1.2950
11/12 71,398,242 11.804% 0.2550 1.2950
12/13 76,163,263 6.674% 0.2500 1.2900
13/14 78,769,779 3.422% 0.2450 1.2850
14/15 80,171,033 1.779% 0.2400 1.2800
15/16 83,142,150 3.706% 0.2400 1.2800
16/17 87,077,713 4.734% 0.2400 1.2800
17/18 87,073,213 -0.005% 0.2400 1.2800
18/19 87,073,194 0.000% 0.2400 1.2800
19/20 87,079,875 0.008% 0.2400 1.2800
Financial Projection: Statistics
Conroe Independent School District
264
Conroe Independent School District
265
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Assessed/Market value of a home 218,246$ 226,515$ 252,948$ 283,155$ 296,236$
Less: Homestead exemption 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 25,000
Taxable value 203,246 211,515 237,948 268,155 271,236
Total property tax rate 1.2900 1.2850 1.2800 1.2800 1.2800
Property tax due 2,622$ 2,718$ 3,046$ 3,432$ 3,472$
Percent of property tax due increase 0.02% 3.67% 12.06% 12.69% 1.15%
(decrease) from prior year
Each year the Montgomery County Appraisal District appraises property based on market conditions such as sales in
the surrounding areas. The above schedule shows how market conditions & tax rates would affect the amount of
property tax due through 2016-17 based on the overall trends of the District.
Conroe Independent School District
Impact of Budget on Taxpayers
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
Property Tax Due
266
Real Property Personal Property Total Ratio of Total
Year Ended Total Assessed Assessed Assessed Assessed to Total
August 31 Market Value Actual Value Actual Value Actual Value Estimated Actual
2008 19,396,354,088 14,307,456,672 2,279,525,812 16,586,982,484 100.0%
2009 21,608,273,418 15,870,725,985 2,484,819,977 18,355,545,962 100.0%
2010 22,991,662,878 17,018,008,478 2,668,225,173 19,686,233,651 100.0%
2011 23,991,799,971 17,781,737,609 2,491,250,011 20,272,987,620 100.0%
2012 24,686,808,151 18,323,816,339 2,666,526,120 20,990,342,459 100.0%
2013 26,050,843,481 19,138,270,459 2,871,709,597 22,009,980,056 100.0%
2014 28,246,187,070 20,648,910,108 3,259,961,347 23,908,871,455 100.0%
2015 31,782,194,180 23,379,122,531 3,549,427,525 26,928,550,056 100.0%
2016 35,825,808,317 25,996,570,366 3,843,838,691 29,840,409,057 100.0%
2017 38,424,242,936 28,494,152,908 3,929,145,415 32,423,298,323 100.0%
Determining Assessed Value:
The market approach to value is based on sales prices of similar properties. It compares the property being appraised to similar properties that have
recently sold and then adjusts the comparable properties differences between them and the property being appraised.
The income approach is based on income and expense data and is used to determine the present worth of future benefits. It seeks to determine what
an investor would pay now for a future revenue stream anticipated to be received from the property.
The cost approach is based on what it would it cost to replace the building (improvement) with one of equal utility. Depreciation is applied and the
estimate is added to the land value.
Conroe Independent School District
Assessed and Estimated Value of Taxable Properties
Last Ten Fiscal Years
Montgomery Country Appraisal District determines the value of all taxable property within the county boundaries. Tax Code Section 25.18 requires
appraisal districts to reappraise all property in its jurisdiction at least once every three years. Tax Code Section 23.01 requires that appraisal districts
comply with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice if mass appraisal is used and that the same appraisal methods and techniques be
used in appraising the same or similar kinds of property. Individual characteristics that affect the property's market value must be evaluated in determining
the property's market value.
Before appraisals begin, Montgomery Country Appraisal District compiles a list of taxable property. The list contains a description and the name and
address of the owner for each property. In a mass appraisal, the appraisal district then classifies properties according to a variety of factors, such as size,
use and construction type. Using data from recent property sales, the appraisal district appraises the value of typical properties in each class. Taking into
account differences such as age or location, the appraisal district uses typical property values to appraise all the properties in each class.
Three common approaches that the appraisal district may use in appraising property are the sales comparison (market) approach, the income approach
and the cost approach.
267
Fiscal Year Current Percent Delinquent Total
Ended Tax of Levy Tax Tax
August 31, Tax Rateª Tax Levy Collections Collected Collections Collections
2007 1.5900 230,983,780 228,802,072 99.1% 2,657,451 231,459,523
2008 1.2400 201,971,250 199,992,815 99.0% 3,083,768 203,076,583
2009 1.2700 233,321,671 230,631,076 98.8% 2,584,330 233,215,406
2010 1.2850 253,535,631 250,811,874 98.9% 1,456,066 252,267,940
2011 1.2950 262,177,711 259,312,291 98.9% 1,600,590 260,912,881
2012 1.2950 271,586,936 269,231,387 99.1% 2,402,018 271,633,405
2013 1.2900 283,604,775 281,471,393 99.2% 2,044,470 283,515,863
2014 1.2850 306,032,828 303,640,582 99.2% 1,655,510 305,296,092
2015 1.2800 342,333,079 340,022,635 99.3% 2,151,240 342,173,875
2016 1.2800 378,256,391 375,151,982 99.2% 1,948,425 377,100,407
2017 1.2800 415,018,219 411,874,912 99.2% 2,495,668 414,370,580
ª Per $100 of assessed value
Conroe Independent School District
Property Tax Rates, Levies, and Collections
Last Ten Fiscal Years and 2017 Projected
268
09/10 10/11 11/12 12/13 13/14 14/15 15/16 16/17
EE 221 226 251 238 212 241 236 279
Pre-K 1,331 1,388 1,423 1,456 1,385 1,319 1,308 1,308
Kindergarten 3,749 3,841 3,865 3,992 4,048 4,186 4,151 4,211
Grade 1 4,019 4,137 4,171 4,178 4,378 4,445 4,606 4,466
Grade 2 3,946 4,040 4,050 4,214 4,207 4,384 4,531 4,706
Grade 3 3,874 4,049 4,144 4,141 4,244 4,263 4,549 4,652
Grade 4 3,763 3,906 4,092 4,126 4,160 4,317 4,373 4,595
Elementary 20,903 21,587 21,996 22,345 22,634 23,155 23,754 24,217
Grade 5 3,773 3,897 4,021 4,130 4,188 4,293 4,467 4,528
Grade 6 3,602 3,827 3,916 4,022 4,138 4,207 4,372 4,414
Intermediate 7,375 7,724 7,937 8,152 8,326 8,500 8,839 8,942
Grade 7 3,630 3,770 4,075 4,122 4,193 4,324 4,425 4,555
Grade 8 3,782 3,702 3,811 4,092 4,241 4,313 4,495 4,607
Junior High 7,412 7,472 7,886 8,214 8,434 8,637 8,920 9,162
Grade 9 4,009 4,176 4,162 4,231 4,329 4,505 4,584 4,579
Grade 10 3,685 3,713 3,894 3,890 4,061 4,310 4,475 4,433
Grade 11 3,117 3,389 3,496 3,711 3,659 3,728 4,018 4,429
Grade 12 3,128 3,109 3,293 3,391 3,566 3,557 3,649 3,877
High School 13,939 14,387 14,845 15,223 15,615 16,100 16,726 17,318
Total 49,629 51,170 52,664 53,934 55,009 56,392 58,239 59,639
Increase from Prior Yr. 1,633 1,541 1,494 1,270 1,075 1,383 1,847 1,400
ADA 46,280 47,883 49,498 50,465 51,830 52,727 54,147 56,061
17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25
EE 262 268 274 280 286 292 298 304
Pre-K 1,548 1,584 1,619 1,655 1,690 1,726 1,761 1,797
Kindergarten 4,492 4,595 4,698 4,801 4,904 5,007 5,110 5,213
Grade 1 4,832 4,943 5,054 5,165 5,276 5,387 5,497 5,608
Grade 2 4,741 4,850 4,958 5,067 5,176 5,284 5,393 5,502
Grade 3 4,735 4,844 4,952 5,061 5,170 5,278 5,387 5,495
Grade 4 4,657 4,764 4,871 4,978 5,085 5,191 5,298 5,405
Elementary 25,268 25,847 26,427 27,007 27,586 28,166 28,745 29,325
Grade 5 4,660 4,767 4,874 4,980 5,087 5,194 5,301 5,408
Grade 6 4,564 4,669 4,773 4,878 4,983 5,087 5,192 5,297
Intermediate 9,224 9,435 9,647 9,858 10,070 10,281 10,493 10,705
Grade 7 4,643 4,749 4,856 4,962 5,069 5,175 5,282 5,388
Grade 8 4,592 4,697 4,802 4,908 5,013 5,118 5,223 5,329
Junior High 9,234 9,446 9,658 9,870 10,081 10,293 10,505 10,717
Grade 9 4,846 4,957 5,069 5,180 5,291 5,402 5,513 5,624
Grade 10 4,534 4,638 4,742 4,846 4,950 5,054 5,158 5,262
Grade 11 4,100 4,194 4,288 4,382 4,476 4,570 4,664 4,758
Grade 12 3,832 3,920 4,008 4,096 4,184 4,272 4,360 4,448
High School 17,313 17,710 18,107 18,505 18,902 19,299 19,696 20,093
Total 61,039 62,439 63,839 65,239 66,639 68,039 69,439 70,839
Increase from Prior Yr. 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400
ADA 57,377 58,693 60,009 61,325 62,641 63,957 65,273 66,589
Conroe Independent School District
Financial Projections: Enrollment
269
2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20
Proposed Projected Projected Projected
Revenues
Local sources 57,030$ -$ -$ -$
Total Revenues 57,030 - - -
Expenditures
81 Facilities Acquisition and Construction
6600 Capital outlay 192,659,698 163,226,272 40,657,532 -
Total Function 81 192,659,698 163,226,272 40,657,532 -
Revenues Over
(Under) Expenditures (192,602,668) (163,226,272) (40,657,532) -
Other Financing Sources (Uses)
General Obligation Bond Proceeds 148,116,196 163,226,272 40,657,532 -
Total Other Financing
Sources (Uses) 148,116,196 163,226,272 40,657,532 -
Revenues and Other Sources
Over (Under) Expenditures (44,486,472) - - -
Fund Balances, beginning 117,274,223 72,787,751.00 72,787,751 72,787,751
Fund Balances, ending 72,787,751$ 72,787,751$ 72,787,751$ 72,787,751$
All capital projects related to the 2015 bond referendum are scheduled to be completed by August 2019.
Capital Projects Fund
Revenue and Expenditure Forecasts
Years Ended August 31, 2017 - August 31, 2020
270
2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20
Proposed Projected Projected Projected
Revenues
Local sources 7,705,214$ 7,859,318 8,016,505 8,176,835
Federal sources 10,294,786 10,346,260 10,397,991 10,449,981
Total Revenues 18,000,000 18,205,578 18,414,496 18,626,816
Expenditures
35 Food Service
6100 Payroll 7,380,000 7,464,287 7,549,943 7,636,995
6200 Purchase and contracted services 1,409,000 1,425,092 1,441,446 1,458,066
6300 Supplies and materials 9,120,000 9,224,160 9,330,011 9,437,587
6400 Other operation expenditures 30,000 30,343 30,691 31,045
6600 Capital outlay 61,000 61,697 62,405 63,125
Total Function 35 18,000,000 18,205,578 18,414,496 18,626,816
Total Expenditures 18,000,000 18,205,578 18,414,496 18,626,816
Excess Revenues Over
(Under) Expenditures -$ -$ -$ -$
Food Service Fund
Revenue and Expenditure Forecasts
Years Ended August 31, 2017- August 31, 2020
271
Conroe Independent School District
272
Informational Section Personnel
Salary Proposals
The Conroe Independent School District (CISD) utilizes the Texas Association of School Boards (TASB)as its compensation consultant. Each year TASB reviews our plan and may make adjustments to allowfor changes in the competitive job market.
The highlights of the pay plan are listed below:
• In establishing the plan, a market study was completed to compare positions in our school district withsimilar positions in surrounding school districts as well as private industry.
• Similar positions are placed in common pay groups based on the knowledge, skills, and effort required.• For each position, there is a midpoint which represents the market rate for the position.
• In 2016-17, salary adjustments were made based on a percentage increase on the midpoint for eachpay group. The percentage increase was 3% all positions.
• If an employee’s current rate of pay was below the midpoint, the percentage increase was higher. If thecurrent rate of pay is higher than the midpoint, the percentage increase is less.
• The goal each year is to make us more competitive with other school districts with whom we competefor employees.
273
Actual Actual Actual Projected Budgeted
Function 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17
11 Instruction 205,201,892$ 221,511,977$ 239,871,891$ 261,209,026$ 276,637,576$
12 Instructional Resources 3,950,855 4,151,741 4,342,285 4,412,309 4,629,349
13 Curriculum & Instruction 1,290,299 2,090,120 2,960,502 3,490,607 3,349,944
21 Instructional Leadership 1,836,683 2,415,177 2,720,582 3,161,787 3,146,725
23 School Leadership 22,505,372 24,441,663 26,700,541 27,907,219 28,372,613
31 Guidance, Counseling, & Eval. 13,196,485 14,433,823 15,538,727 13,078,201 14,631,846
32 Social Work Services 272,135 309,018 401,340 555,066 551,901
33 Health Services 3,646,174 3,895,344 4,415,789 4,739,299 4,726,815
34 Student Transportation 13,516,453 14,525,470 15,686,305 17,719,302 18,348,114
36 Co-curricular Activities 5,530,581 5,877,420 6,168,393 6,223,534 6,181,056
41 General Administration 4,246,025 4,682,996 5,264,186 5,629,181 5,999,463
51 Plant Maintenance & Operations 17,102,255 19,089,447 19,964,035 22,304,248 22,608,849
52 Security & Monitor Service 3,915,922 4,662,429 5,046,661 5,486,901 5,529,723
53 Data Processing 2,564,248 2,840,875 3,274,108 3,693,589 3,851,780
61 Community Services 4,544 3,720 6,977 1,975 1,000
Total General Fund Payroll
Expenditures 298,779,923$ 324,931,220$ 352,362,322$ 379,612,244$ 398,566,754$
Percentage Increase 5.5% 8.8% 8.4% 7.7% 5.0%
Conroe Independent School District
General FundSchedule of Payroll Expenditures by Function
274
Actual Actual Actual Projected Budgeted
Position 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17
Administrators 174.0 179.0 185.0 186.0 190.0
Counselors 147.1 149.6 161.6 161.6 164.6
Librarians 57.0 59.0 61.0 61.0 62.0
Manual Trades 858.0 891.0 910.5 925.5 943.5
Nurses 54.2 56.2 59.2 60.2 61.2
Paraprofessionals/Aides 823.5 863.5 886.0 896.5 916.5
Professionals 76.0 86.9 99.9 107.4 111.4
Psych/OTPT Services - Paraprofessional 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Psych/OTPT Services - Professionals 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0 19.0
Special Ed - Paraprofessional 20.0 21.0 21.0 29.0 39.0
Special Ed - Professionals 21.8 22.8 22.8 22.8 24.8
Support Personnel 87.0 94.0 95.0 98.0 100.0
Teachers 3,057.1 3,157.6 3,264.1 3,358.6 3,447.6
Totals 5,397.7 5,602.6 5,788.1 5,928.6 6,082.6
Percentage Change 2.05% 3.80% 3.31% 2.43% 2.60%
Conroe Independent School District
Position Counts by Year(General Fund only)
275
Deputy Deputy
Supt. Supt. Financial Supt./ 16-17
Position Schools Operations Services Board Legal Security Campuses Total
Administrators - 1.5 - 1.0 1.0 - 186.5 190.0
Counselors 15.5 - - - - - 149.1 164.6
Librarians - - - - - - 62.0 62.0
Manual Trades - 943.5 - - - - - 943.5
Nurses 2.0 - - - - - 59.2 61.2
Paraprofessionals/Aides 40.5 57.1 19.0 2.0 1.5 1.0 795.4 916.5
Professionals 49.0 45.4 14.0 2.0 - 1.0 - 111.4
Psych/OTPT Services - Paraprof. 3.0 - - - - - - 3.0
Psych/OTPT Services - Prof. 19.0 - - - - - - 19.0
Special Ed - Paraprofessional 39.0 - - - - - - 39.0
Special Ed - Professionals 24.8 - - - - - - 24.8
Support Personnel - 6.0 12.0 - - 82.0 - 100.0
Teachers 47.5 - - - - - 3,400.1 3,447.6
Totals 240.3 1,053.5 45.0 5.0 2.5 84.0 4,652.3 6,082.6
Percentage of Total 3.95% 17.32% 0.74% 0.08% 0.04% 1.38% 76.49% 100.00%
Conroe Independent School District
Budgeted Position Counts by Division and in Total(General Fund only)
4%
17%
1%
77%
1%
Position Counts by Division
Dep Supt Schools
Dep Supt Operations
Security
Campuses
Other
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16 16-17
Financial Operations CampususInstruction SecurityOther
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
Position Counts by Year
276
Years Bachelor's
Experience Degree
0 51,500 Master's Degree:
1 51,700 The salary scale for teachers with a master's degree is
2 51,975 based on the bachelor's degree scale noted here, plus
3 52,415 a stipend of $1,800 per year.
4 52,795
5 53,170
6 53,395 Doctorate Degree:
7 53,695 The salary scale for teachers with a doctorate degree
8 53,995 (degree must be in the subject area taught and received
9 54,395 from an accredited university) is based on the bachelor's
10 54,895 degree scale noted here, plus a stipend of $3,600
11 55,395 per year.
12 55,895
13 56,395
14 56,895
15 57,395
16 57,895
17 58,395
18 58,895
19 59,395
20 59,995
21 60,495
22 60,995
23 61,495
24 61,895
25+ 62,295
*Creditable years of experience as of September 1, 2016
Salary schedules are developed for one year only. Future salaries cannot be predicted from this schedule.
certification, who are assigned to a bilingual
classroom, is based on the bachelor's degree scale
noted here, plus a stipend of $4,000 per year.
Conroe Independent School District
Teachers, Librarians, Nurses and ARD Facilitators Salary Scale
2016-2017 School Year Only
Hiring Schedule
Bilingual Certification
The salary scale for teachers with Texas bilingual
277
STAFFING FORMULAS Elementary & Intermediate School Pupil - Teacher Ratio Formula
2016-2017 School Year Regular Education Allocations
Grade(s) Staffing Ratio Pre K 22:1 K-4 22:1 5-6 26:1
Position Number of Staff Members Enrollment Principal 1 NA
Assistant Principal 1 Up to 849 2 850 to 1,199 3 1,200 or Above
Counselor (Elementary) 1 NA Counselor (Intermediate) 1 Up to 999
2 1,000 or Above
Librarian 1 NA Nurse 1 NA Nurse’s Aide .5 750 to 999
1 1,000 or Above
Principal’s Secretary 1 NA Attendance Clerk 1 NA
Clerical/Instructional Aides 3 Up to 649 4 650 to 799 5 800 to 999 6 1,000 or Above
Bilingual Instructional Aides 1 Up to 199 2 200 to 349 3 350 or Above
Art (Elementary) 1 Up to 849 2 850 or Above
Art (Intermediate) 2 Up to 1,199 3 1,200 or Above
Physical Education 1 Up to 749 2 750 to 1,049 3 (Intermediate only) 1,050 or Above
Music 1 NA
Band (Intermediate) 1 Up to 199 2 200 to 299 3 300 to 599 4 600 or Above
Orchestra (Intermediate) 1 NA Orchestra Aide 1 150 or Above
Fine Arts (Intermediate) 1 1,050 to 1,249 2 1,250 or Above
Special Education, Title I, and Compensatory Education teachers and aides are not included in the allocations.
278
STAFFING FORMULASJunior High School Pupil – Teacher Ratio Formula
2016-2017 School Year
Regular Education Allocations
The initial allocation is based on a teacher pupil ratio of 22:1. Bonus units may be given toprovide for unusual scheduling problems.
Position
Principal
Assistant Principals
Counselors
*AP or Counselor
Band DirectorAssistant Band Director
Choir Director
Orchestra
Librarian
Dyslexia Teacher/504
NurseNurses Aide
Clerical AidesPrincipal’s SecretaryA/P SecretaryCounselor’s SecretaryAttendance ClerkReceptionistISS AideTechnology TechAdd’l Aides(including Library Aide)
Student Success Teacher
Number of Staff Members
1
23
23
1
11
1
1
1
.5
1.51
111111124567
1
Enrollment
N/A
Up to 1,4991,500 or Above
Up to 1,4991,500 or Above
1,200 or Above
N/A150 or Above
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A750 to 9991,000 or Above
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AUp to 899900 to 1,0991,100 to 1,4991,500 to 1,9992,000 and above
N/A
*Note: Campuses may have either an Assistant Principal or a Counselor when enrollmentreaches 1,200.
Special Education and Compensatory Education teachers and aides are not included in theallocations.
279
STAFFING FORMULASNinth Grade Campus – Teacher Ratio Formula
2016-2017 School Year
Regular Education Allocations
The initial allocation is based on a teacher pupil ration of 22:1. Bonus units may be given to provide for unusual scheduling problems.
Position Number of Staff Members Enrollment
Principal 1 N/A
Assistant Principals 2 Up to 1,499 3 1,500 or Above
Counselors 2 Up to 1,499
Assistant Band Director 1
Choir Director 1 N/A
Dyslexia Teacher/504 .5 N/A
ESL Teacher 1 Athletic Trainer 1
Librarian 1 N/A
Nurse 1 N/A Nurses’ Aide .5 750 to 999
1 1,000 or Above Clerical Aides Principal’s Secretary 1 N/A A/P Secretary 1 N/A Counselor’s Secretary 1 N/A Attendance Clerk 1 N/A Receptionist 1 N/A ISS Aide 1 N/A Technology Tech 1 N/A Add’l Aides (including Library Aide) 2 Up to 749
3 750 to 1,099 4 1,100 or Above
Note: Special Education and Compensatory Education teachers and aides are not included in the allocations.
280
STAFFING FORMULASHigh School Pupil – Teacher Ratio Formula
2016-2017 School Year Regular Education Allocations
The initial allocation is based on a teacher pupil ratio of 22:1. Bonus units may be given to provide forunusual scheduling problems.Position
PrincipalAssociate Principals Assistant Principals
Counselors
Band DirectorAssistant Band Director
Choir DirectorAccompanist
Athletic DirectorAthletic Trainers
Orchestra
Librarian
Library Aide
Dyslexia/504
NurseNurses Aide
Clerical AidesPrincipal’s SecretaryAssoc & A/P SecretaryCounselor’s SecretaryAthletic SecretaryAttendance ClerkBudget ClerkActivity Fund SecretaryReceptionistRegistrarTextbookISS AideTechnology TechAdd’l Aides
Number of Staff Members
12234567
56789
10
11
11
12
1
12
1
.5
11
1311111111113456789
10
Enrollment
N/AN/AUp to 9991,000 to 1,4991,500 to 1,9992,000 to 2,4992,500 to 2,9993,000 to 3,499
Up to 9991,000 to 1,4991,500 to 1,9992,000 to 2,4992,500 to 2,9993,000 to 3,499
N/AN/A
N/AN/A
N/A
N/A2,000 or Above
N/A
N/A
N/AN/A
N/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AUp to 1,1991,200 to 1,3991,400 to 1,5991,600 to 1,7991,800 to 1,9992,000 to 2,1992,200 to 2,4992,500 or Above
Special Education and Compensatory Education teachers and aides are not included in the allocations.
281
Conroe Independent School District
282
Informational Section Performance Measures
CCoonnrrooee IInnddeeppeennddeenntt SSCChhooooll ddIISSttrrIICCtt
AAnnnnuuAAll AACCCCoouunnttAAbbIIllIIttyy SSuummmmAArrIIeeSS
Executive Summary
The success of CISD is attributable to the collective and shared work of its teachers, students,administrators, support staff, and parents. CISD is committed to its vision that all students willgraduate with competence and confidence.
The District continues to grow in both enrollment and diversity, steadily adding more than athousand students each year. The ethnic makeup of the District continues to diversify with theaddition of more students who identify as Hispanic, African-American, or with two or more races.
Texas developed a new accountability system in 2013. The accountability system assignsratings that designate acceptable and unacceptable performance for campuses and districts.Districts and campuses are assigned a rating that is based on meeting a target for eachperformance index.
Met Standard. Acceptable rating assigned to districts and campuses that meet the target on allindexes for which it has performance data in 2016. This rating applies to campuses servinggrades prekindergarten (PK) through 12 (including campuses with assessment data due topairing).
Met Alternative Standard. Acceptable rating assigned to charter operators and alternativeeducation campuses (AECs) that are evaluated by alternative education accountability (AEA)provisions and meet modified targets on all performance indexes for which they haveperformance data in 2016.
Improvement Required. Unacceptable rating assigned to districts, campuses, charteroperators, and alternative education campuses (AECs) that miss the target on one or moreperformance indexes.
Not Rated. Indicates that a district or campus is not rated for one of the following reasons:
• The district or campus serves only students enrolled in Early Education (EE);
• The district or campus has no data in the accountability subset;
• The district or campus has insufficient data to rate through Small Numbers Analysis;
• The campus is a Juvenile Justice Alternative Education Program (JJAEP);
• The campus is a Disciplinary Alternative Education Program (DAEP);
• The campus is a residential facility;
• The district operates only residential facilities; or
• The district or campus faces unusual circumstances
Committed to Excellence
283
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
CONROE ISD (170902)
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campuses must meet targets onthree indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=22)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=60)
85 42 46 80
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 80,346 94,180 852 - Student Progress 847 2,000 423 - Closing Performance Gaps 1,392 3,000 464 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 15.5
Graduation Rate Score 23.9
Graduation Plan Score 22.4
Postsecondary Component Score 18.6 80
Distinction Designation
Postsecondary Readiness
Percent of Eligible Measures in Top Quartile31 out of 93 = 33%
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
System Safeguards
Number and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 45 out of 52 = 87%
Participation Rates 22 out of 22 = 100%
Graduation Rates 9 out of 9 = 100%
Met Federal Limits onAlternative Assessments 1 out of 1 = 100%
Total 77 out of 84 = 92%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
284
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability SummaryCONROE H S (170902001) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=17)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=30)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=60)
77 23 45 78
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 3,968 5,143 772 - Student Progress 319 1,400 233 - Closing Performance Gaps 1,074 2,400 454 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 15.0
Graduation Rate Score 24.2
Graduation Plan Score 22.2
Postsecondary Component Score 17.0 78
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type High School
Campus Size 3,604 Students
Grade Span 09 - 12
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 56.7
Percent English LanguageLearners 9.1
Mobility Rate 16.5
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 24 out of 30 = 80%
Participation Rates 16 out of 16 = 100%
Graduation Rates 7 out of 7 = 100%
Total 47 out of 53 = 89%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 1 September 2016
285
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
HAUKE ALTER ED (170902002) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Alternative Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=35)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=8)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=13)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=33)
58 30 30 100
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 115 198 582 - Student Progress 59 200 303 - Closing Performance Gaps 242 800 304 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 5.2
Graduation Rate Score 74.1
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 100*
* Includes bonus points that may have been added to the Index 4 Score.
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NOT ELIGIBLE
Postsecondary Readiness
NOT ELIGIBLE
Campus Demographics
Campus Type High School
Campus Size 127 Students
Grade Span 08 - 12
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 59.8
Percent English LanguageLearners 5.5
Mobility Rate 63.1
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 5 out of 9 = 56%
Participation Rates 6 out of 6 = 100%
Graduation Rates 4 out of 4 = 100%
Total 15 out of 19 = 79%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 2 September 2016
286
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
THE WOODLANDS H S (170902003) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=17)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=30)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=60)
94 31 63 89
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 4,759 5,067 942 - Student Progress 501 1,600 313 - Closing Performance Gaps 1,383 2,200 634 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 21.1
Graduation Rate Score 23.7
Graduation Plan Score 23.2
Postsecondary Component Score 21.4 89
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type High School
Campus Size 4,261 Students
Grade Span 09 - 12
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 3.6
Percent English LanguageLearners 3.2
Mobility Rate 7.1
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 31 out of 33 = 94%
Participation Rates 16 out of 16 = 100%
Graduation Rates 7 out of 8 = 88%
Total 54 out of 57 = 95%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 3 September 2016
287
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
OAK RIDGE H S (170902005) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=17)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=30)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=60)
89 33 53 82
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 4,434 4,984 892 - Student Progress 523 1,600 333 - Closing Performance Gaps 1,263 2,400 534 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 18.4
Graduation Rate Score 23.9
Graduation Plan Score 23.2
Postsecondary Component Score 16.3 82
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type High School
Campus Size 3,860 Students
Grade Span 09 - 12
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 23.5
Percent English LanguageLearners 2.8
Mobility Rate 11.3
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 31 out of 34 = 91%
Participation Rates 16 out of 17 = 94%
Graduation Rates 6 out of 6 = 100%
Total 53 out of 57 = 93%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 4 September 2016
288
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
JJAEP (170902010) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Not Rated
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- NONE - NONE
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
Index 2
StudentProgress
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement N/A N/A N/A2 - Student Progress N/A N/A N/A3 - Closing Performance Gaps N/A N/A N/A4 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score N/A
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A N/A
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NOT ELIGIBLE
Postsecondary Readiness
NOT ELIGIBLE
Campus Demographics
Campus Type High School
Campus Size 33 Students
Grade Span 07 - 12
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 51.5
Percent English LanguageLearners 9.1
Mobility Rate 97.1
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates N/A
Participation Rates N/A
Graduation Rates N/A
Total N/A
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 5 September 2016
289
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
CANEY CREEK H S (170902011) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=17)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=30)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=60)
69 16 41 76
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 2,037 2,964 692 - Student Progress 159 1,000 163 - Closing Performance Gaps 660 1,600 414 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 11.6
Graduation Rate Score 23.7
Graduation Plan Score 23.0
Postsecondary Component Score 17.4 76
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type High School
Campus Size 1,912 Students
Grade Span 09 - 12
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 63.9
Percent English LanguageLearners 7.2
Mobility Rate 19.4
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 14 out of 22 = 64%
Participation Rates 13 out of 13 = 100%
Graduation Rates 4 out of 5 = 80%
Total 31 out of 40 = 78%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 6 September 2016
290
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
COLLEGE PARK H S (170902014) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=17)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=30)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=60)
92 33 58 88
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 3,144 3,421 922 - Student Progress 527 1,600 333 - Closing Performance Gaps 1,385 2,400 584 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 20.5
Graduation Rate Score 23.8
Graduation Plan Score 23.5
Postsecondary Component Score 19.9 88
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type High School
Campus Size 2,831 Students
Grade Span 09 - 12
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 12.8
Percent English LanguageLearners 3.1
Mobility Rate 9.8
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 26 out of 29 = 90%
Participation Rates 16 out of 16 = 100%
Graduation Rates 7 out of 7 = 100%
Total 49 out of 52 = 94%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 7 September 2016
291
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
PEET J H (170902041) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=30)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=26)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=13)
77 44 37 53
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 3,111 4,055 772 - Student Progress 705 1,600 443 - Closing Performance Gaps 1,118 3,000 374 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 52.8
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 53
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Middle School
Campus Size 1,256 Students
Grade Span 07 - 08
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 52.8
Percent English LanguageLearners 12.7
Mobility Rate 15.2
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 23 out of 39 = 59%
Participation Rates 18 out of 18 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 41 out of 57 = 72%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 8 September 2016
292
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
WASHINGTON J H (170902043) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=30)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=26)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=13)
72 39 41 41
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 1,837 2,560 722 - Student Progress 468 1,200 393 - Closing Performance Gaps 1,235 3,000 414 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 41.0
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 41
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Middle School
Campus Size 768 Students
Grade Span 07 - 08
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 86.7
Percent English LanguageLearners 26.6
Mobility Rate 13.8
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 25 out of 35 = 71%
Participation Rates 14 out of 14 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 39 out of 49 = 80%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 9 September 2016
293
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
WILKERSON INT (170902045) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=30)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=26)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=13)
83 41 43 47
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 1,318 1,590 832 - Student Progress 653 1,600 413 - Closing Performance Gaps 769 1,800 434 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 46.6
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 47
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Middle School
Campus Size 683 Students
Grade Span 05 - 06
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 35.1
Percent English LanguageLearners 9.7
Mobility Rate 11.9
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 19 out of 23 = 83%
Participation Rates 16 out of 16 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 35 out of 39 = 90%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 10 September 2016
294
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
KNOX J H (170902046) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=30)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=26)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=13)
90 47 49 73
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 3,924 4,375 902 - Student Progress 749 1,600 473 - Closing Performance Gaps 1,480 3,000 494 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 72.8
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 73
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Middle School
Campus Size 1,335 Students
Grade Span 07 - 08
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 19.8
Percent English LanguageLearners 5.4
Mobility Rate 11.1
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 34 out of 40 = 85%
Participation Rates 18 out of 18 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 52 out of 58 = 90%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 11 September 2016
295
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
YORK J H (170902049) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=30)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=26)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=13)
86 43 49 61
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 3,252 3,776 862 - Student Progress 688 1,600 433 - Closing Performance Gaps 1,172 2,400 494 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 61.0
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 61
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Middle School
Campus Size 1,117 Students
Grade Span 07 - 08
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 17.5
Percent English LanguageLearners 2.1
Mobility Rate 8.3
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 29 out of 34 = 85%
Participation Rates 18 out of 18 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 47 out of 52 = 90%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 12 September 2016
296
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability SummaryCOLLINS INT (170902050) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=30)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=26)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=13)
98 57 71 82
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 1,644 1,678 982 - Student Progress 791 1,400 573 - Closing Performance Gaps 1,131 1,600 714 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 82.0
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 82
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Middle School
Campus Size 696 Students
Grade Span 05 - 06
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 7.3
Percent English LanguageLearners 2.3
Mobility Rate 6.0
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 16 out of 16 = 100%
Participation Rates 14 out of 14 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 30 out of 30 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 13 September 2016
297
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
MOORHEAD J H (170902051) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=30)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=26)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=13)
73 40 40 37
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 2,531 3,457 732 - Student Progress 401 1,000 403 - Closing Performance Gaps 793 2,000 404 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 37.0
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 37
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Middle School
Campus Size 1,056 Students
Grade Span 07 - 08
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 72.2
Percent English LanguageLearners 15.0
Mobility Rate 14.5
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 21 out of 30 = 70%
Participation Rates 12 out of 12 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 33 out of 42 = 79%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 14 September 2016
298
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
MCCULLOUGH J H (170902053) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=30)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=26)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=13)
96 50 59 83
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 7,171 7,495 962 - Student Progress 804 1,600 503 - Closing Performance Gaps 1,641 2,800 594 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 83.3
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 83
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Middle School
Campus Size 2,223 Students
Grade Span 07 - 08
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 5.5
Percent English LanguageLearners 5.0
Mobility Rate 6.3
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 44 out of 44 = 100%
Participation Rates 18 out of 18 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 62 out of 62 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 15 September 2016
299
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
IRONS J H (170902054) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=30)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=26)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=13)
88 44 48 62
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 3,408 3,894 882 - Student Progress 697 1,600 443 - Closing Performance Gaps 1,451 3,000 484 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 61.7
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 62
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Middle School
Campus Size 1,144 Students
Grade Span 07 - 08
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 30.8
Percent English LanguageLearners 4.9
Mobility Rate 11.5
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 32 out of 37 = 86%
Participation Rates 18 out of 18 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 50 out of 55 = 91%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 16 September 2016
300
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability SummaryMITCHELL INT (170902067) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=30)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=26)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=13)
96 49 61 69
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 2,839 2,959 962 - Student Progress 779 1,600 493 - Closing Performance Gaps 977 1,600 614 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 69.0
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 69
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Middle School
Campus Size 1,243 Students
Grade Span 05 - 06
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 4.7
Percent English LanguageLearners 3.9
Mobility Rate 5.9
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 24 out of 24 = 100%
Participation Rates 18 out of 18 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 42 out of 42 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 17 September 2016
301
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
GRANGERLAND INT (170902068) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=30)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=26)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=13)
71 36 38 25
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 1,695 2,404 712 - Student Progress 428 1,200 363 - Closing Performance Gaps 461 1,200 384 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 24.7
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 25
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Middle School
Campus Size 1,012 Students
Grade Span 05 - 06
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 74.4
Percent English LanguageLearners 25.1
Mobility Rate 13.6
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 14 out of 18 = 78%
Participation Rates 12 out of 12 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 26 out of 30 = 87%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 18 September 2016
302
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
VOGEL INT (170902069) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=30)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=26)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=13)
87 45 47 48
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 2,240 2,562 872 - Student Progress 716 1,600 453 - Closing Performance Gaps 846 1,800 474 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 48.3
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 48
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Middle School
Campus Size 1,078 Students
Grade Span 05 - 06
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 37.5
Percent English LanguageLearners 11.7
Mobility Rate 10.3
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 23 out of 25 = 92%
Participation Rates 18 out of 18 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 41 out of 43 = 95%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 19 September 2016
303
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
TRAVIS INT (170902070) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=30)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=26)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=13)
72 44 38 26
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 1,004 1,389 722 - Student Progress 532 1,200 443 - Closing Performance Gaps 686 1,800 384 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 26.0
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 26
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Middle School
Campus Size 596 Students
Grade Span 05 - 06
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 91.8
Percent English LanguageLearners 52.9
Mobility Rate 16.2
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 16 out of 20 = 80%
Participation Rates 14 out of 14 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 30 out of 34 = 88%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 20 September 2016
304
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
TOUGH EL (170902071) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
97 56 69 86
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 1,500 1,550 972 - Student Progress 673 1,200 563 - Closing Performance Gaps 1,648 2,400 694 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 85.5
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 86
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 1,006 Students
Grade Span KG - 06
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 3.5
Percent English LanguageLearners 12.5
Mobility Rate 8.1
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 16 out of 16 = 100%
Participation Rates 12 out of 12 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 28 out of 28 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 21 September 2016
305
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
CRYAR INTERMEDIATE (170902073) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=30)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=26)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=13)
83 38 43 36
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 1,219 1,475 832 - Student Progress 609 1,600 383 - Closing Performance Gaps 775 1,800 434 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 36.3
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 36
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Middle School
Campus Size 630 Students
Grade Span 05 - 06
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 52.7
Percent English LanguageLearners 14.1
Mobility Rate 16.1
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 18 out of 21 = 86%
Participation Rates 14 out of 14 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 32 out of 35 = 91%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 22 September 2016
306
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability SummaryDERETCHIN EL (170902074) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
98 58 72 79
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 1,588 1,623 982 - Student Progress 932 1,600 583 - Closing Performance Gaps 1,591 2,200 724 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 79.0
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 79
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 1,061 Students
Grade Span EE - 06
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 3.4
Percent English LanguageLearners 12.7
Mobility Rate 8.0
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 20 out of 20 = 100%
Participation Rates 16 out of 16 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 36 out of 36 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 23 September 2016
307
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
COX INT (170902077) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=30)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=26)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=13)
93 43 53 59
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 2,754 2,963 932 - Student Progress 687 1,600 433 - Closing Performance Gaps 960 1,800 534 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 59.2
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 59
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Middle School
Campus Size 1,228 Students
Grade Span 05 - 06
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 16.4
Percent English LanguageLearners 2.4
Mobility Rate 6.9
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 25 out of 25 = 100%
Participation Rates 18 out of 18 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 43 out of 43 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 24 September 2016
308
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability SummaryBOZMAN INT (170902078) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=30)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=26)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=13)
84 39 46 37
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 1,602 1,911 842 - Student Progress 544 1,400 393 - Closing Performance Gaps 736 1,600 464 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 37.0
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 37
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Middle School
Campus Size 799 Students
Grade Span 05 - 06
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 64.6
Percent English LanguageLearners 25.9
Mobility Rate 11.6
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 19 out of 20 = 95%
Participation Rates 14 out of 14 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 33 out of 34 = 97%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 25 September 2016
309
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability SummaryANDERSON EL (170902101) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
86 45 56 51
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 444 516 862 - Student Progress 356 800 453 - Closing Performance Gaps 337 600 564 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 51.0
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 51
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 680 Students
Grade Span EE - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 83.1
Percent English LanguageLearners 61.2
Mobility Rate 12.1
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 12 out of 12 = 100%
Participation Rates 8 out of 8 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 20 out of 20 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 26 September 2016
310
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
AUSTIN EL (170902102) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
67 38 39 23
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 486 721 672 - Student Progress 381 1,000 383 - Closing Performance Gaps 462 1,200 394 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 23.0
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 23
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 909 Students
Grade Span EE - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 77.1
Percent English LanguageLearners 36.5
Mobility Rate 17.1
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 14 out of 17 = 82%
Participation Rates 12 out of 12 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 26 out of 29 = 90%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 27 September 2016
311
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
RUNYAN EL (170902103) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
71 37 43 38
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 416 585 712 - Student Progress 369 1,000 373 - Closing Performance Gaps 259 600 434 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 37.7
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 38
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 686 Students
Grade Span EE - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 80.0
Percent English LanguageLearners 52.8
Mobility Rate 16.8
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 13 out of 16 = 81%
Participation Rates 12 out of 12 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 25 out of 28 = 89%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 28 September 2016
312
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability SummaryHOUSTON EL (170902104) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Improvement Required
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Closing Performance Gaps - Student Achievement
- Postsecondary Readiness - Student Progress
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
57 27 28 15
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 384 676 572 - Student Progress 266 1,000 273 - Closing Performance Gaps 280 1,000 284 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 14.7
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 15
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 795 Students
Grade Span PK - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 90.3
Percent English LanguageLearners 51.4
Mobility Rate 22.2
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 5 out of 16 = 31%
Participation Rates 14 out of 14 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 19 out of 30 = 63%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 29 September 2016
313
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
MILAM EL (170902105) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
67 34 37 29
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 461 693 672 - Student Progress 336 1,000 343 - Closing Performance Gaps 443 1,200 374 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 28.7
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 29
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 811 Students
Grade Span EE - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 79.5
Percent English LanguageLearners 38.5
Mobility Rate 15.2
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 10 out of 15 = 67%
Participation Rates 12 out of 12 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 22 out of 27 = 81%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 30 September 2016
314
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
CREIGHTON EL (170902106) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
68 37 38 27
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 477 702 682 - Student Progress 368 1,000 373 - Closing Performance Gaps 454 1,200 384 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 26.7
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 27
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 881 Students
Grade Span PK - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 78.4
Percent English LanguageLearners 38.5
Mobility Rate 17.3
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 14 out of 17 = 82%
Participation Rates 12 out of 12 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 26 out of 29 = 90%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 31 September 2016
315
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
ARMSTRONG EL (170902107) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
70 40 41 30
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 335 476 702 - Student Progress 237 600 403 - Closing Performance Gaps 247 600 414 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 30.0
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 30
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 682 Students
Grade Span PK - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 91.1
Percent English LanguageLearners 64.1
Mobility Rate 17.6
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 12 out of 12 = 100%
Participation Rates 8 out of 8 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 20 out of 20 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 32 September 2016
316
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
LAMAR EL (170902108) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
87 49 50 55
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 547 629 872 - Student Progress 493 1,000 493 - Closing Performance Gaps 602 1,200 504 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 54.7
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 55
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 696 Students
Grade Span PK - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 32.5
Percent English LanguageLearners 14.5
Mobility Rate 20.4
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 14 out of 14 = 100%
Participation Rates 12 out of 12 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 26 out of 26 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 33 September 2016
317
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability SummaryOAK RIDGE EL (170902109) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
89 34 53 51
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 436 492 892 - Student Progress 201 600 343 - Closing Performance Gaps 636 1,200 534 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 50.7
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 51
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 551 Students
Grade Span PK - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 36.7
Percent English LanguageLearners 4.4
Mobility Rate 13.0
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 12 out of 12 = 100%
Participation Rates 10 out of 10 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 22 out of 22 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 34 September 2016
318
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
HOUSER EL (170902111) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
73 31 40 36
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 548 746 732 - Student Progress 375 1,200 313 - Closing Performance Gaps 643 1,600 404 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 35.5
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 36
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 863 Students
Grade Span EE - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 56.8
Percent English LanguageLearners 28.7
Mobility Rate 13.8
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 14 out of 19 = 74%
Participation Rates 14 out of 14 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 28 out of 33 = 85%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 35 September 2016
319
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
FORD EL (170902112) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
84 45 52 43
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 699 828 842 - Student Progress 453 1,000 453 - Closing Performance Gaps 829 1,600 524 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 43.3
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 43
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 1,006 Students
Grade Span PK - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 54.2
Percent English LanguageLearners 34.2
Mobility Rate 19.7
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 18 out of 19 = 95%
Participation Rates 14 out of 14 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 32 out of 33 = 97%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 36 September 2016
320
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
HAILEY EL (170902113) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
86 39 50 46
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 536 626 862 - Student Progress 390 1,000 393 - Closing Performance Gaps 600 1,200 504 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 46.3
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 46
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 720 Students
Grade Span PK - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 39.9
Percent English LanguageLearners 6.5
Mobility Rate 18.5
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 14 out of 14 = 100%
Participation Rates 10 out of 10 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 24 out of 24 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 37 September 2016
321
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
RICE EL (170902114) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
74 30 43 29
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 356 481 742 - Student Progress 296 1,000 303 - Closing Performance Gaps 691 1,600 434 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 28.8
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 29
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 651 Students
Grade Span PK - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 62.8
Percent English LanguageLearners 24.0
Mobility Rate 23.6
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 14 out of 16 = 88%
Participation Rates 12 out of 12 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 26 out of 28 = 93%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 38 September 2016
322
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
SAN JACINTO EL (170902115) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
71 37 42 34
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 387 545 712 - Student Progress 298 800 373 - Closing Performance Gaps 504 1,200 424 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 34.0
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 34
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 700 Students
Grade Span PK - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 77.0
Percent English LanguageLearners 33.7
Mobility Rate 20.3
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 10 out of 15 = 67%
Participation Rates 10 out of 10 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 20 out of 25 = 80%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 39 September 2016
323
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability SummaryGLEN LOCH EL (170902116) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
85 44 48 49
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 398 471 852 - Student Progress 355 800 443 - Closing Performance Gaps 580 1,200 484 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 48.7
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 49
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 627 Students
Grade Span EE - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 45.9
Percent English LanguageLearners 35.6
Mobility Rate 14.3
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 15 out of 15 = 100%
Participation Rates 10 out of 10 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 25 out of 25 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 40 September 2016
324
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
RIDE EL (170902117) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
92 44 57 74
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 616 666 922 - Student Progress 524 1,200 443 - Closing Performance Gaps 685 1,200 574 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 74.0
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 74
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 643 Students
Grade Span KG - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 10.6
Percent English LanguageLearners 5.6
Mobility Rate 10.2
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 13 out of 15 = 87%
Participation Rates 12 out of 12 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 25 out of 27 = 93%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 41 September 2016
325
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
DAVID EL (170902118) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
94 47 64 76
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 569 608 942 - Student Progress 279 600 473 - Closing Performance Gaps 636 1,000 644 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 76.3
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 76
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 626 Students
Grade Span KG - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 5.3
Percent English LanguageLearners 3.0
Mobility Rate 6.3
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 8 out of 8 = 100%
Participation Rates 6 out of 6 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 14 out of 14 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 42 September 2016
326
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability SummaryGIESINGER EL (170902119) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
91 48 49 55
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 419 461 912 - Student Progress 287 600 483 - Closing Performance Gaps 291 600 494 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 55.3
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 55
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 536 Students
Grade Span EE - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 22.6
Percent English LanguageLearners 4.3
Mobility Rate 21.0
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 10 out of 10 = 100%
Participation Rates 8 out of 8 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 18 out of 18 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 43 September 2016
327
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability SummaryGALATAS EL (170902120) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
96 53 71 86
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 678 705 962 - Student Progress 318 600 533 - Closing Performance Gaps 1,132 1,600 714 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 86.0
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 86
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 663 Students
Grade Span KG - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 2.4
Percent English LanguageLearners 6.3
Mobility Rate 6.3
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 10 out of 10 = 100%
Participation Rates 8 out of 8 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 18 out of 18 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 44 September 2016
328
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
BUSH EL (170902121) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
96 54 57 74
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 788 818 962 - Student Progress 435 800 543 - Closing Performance Gaps 570 1,000 574 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 74.0
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 74
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 720 Students
Grade Span EE - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 11.1
Percent English LanguageLearners 4.7
Mobility Rate 7.0
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 12 out of 12 = 100%
Participation Rates 10 out of 10 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 22 out of 22 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 45 September 2016
329
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
POWELL EL (170902122) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
95 46 67 74
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 764 801 952 - Student Progress 276 600 463 - Closing Performance Gaps 798 1,200 674 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 73.7
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 74
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 768 Students
Grade Span EE - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 8.6
Percent English LanguageLearners 4.4
Mobility Rate 12.4
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 11 out of 11 = 100%
Participation Rates 10 out of 10 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 21 out of 21 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 46 September 2016
330
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability SummaryBUCKALEW EL (170902123) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
98 59 77 84
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 688 705 982 - Student Progress 353 600 593 - Closing Performance Gaps 1,228 1,600 774 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 84.0
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 84
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 668 Students
Grade Span KG - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 1.8
Percent English LanguageLearners 3.4
Mobility Rate 7.2
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 12 out of 12 = 100%
Participation Rates 10 out of 10 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 22 out of 22 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 47 September 2016
331
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
REAVES EL (170902124) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
83 43 50 38
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 433 523 832 - Student Progress 517 1,200 433 - Closing Performance Gaps 899 1,800 504 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 37.8
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 38
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 714 Students
Grade Span PK - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 74.6
Percent English LanguageLearners 34.0
Mobility Rate 20.3
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 17 out of 17 = 100%
Participation Rates 12 out of 12 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 29 out of 29 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 48 September 2016
332
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability SummaryKAUFMAN EL (170902125) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
92 48 53 62
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 715 781 922 - Student Progress 385 800 483 - Closing Performance Gaps 641 1,200 534 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 61.7
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 62
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 829 Students
Grade Span KG - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 11.9
Percent English LanguageLearners 1.7
Mobility Rate 6.4
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 13 out of 13 = 100%
Participation Rates 10 out of 10 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 23 out of 23 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 49 September 2016
333
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability SummaryWILKINSON EL (170902126) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
89 34 50 58
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 464 519 892 - Student Progress 204 600 343 - Closing Performance Gaps 597 1,200 504 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 57.7
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 58
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 620 Students
Grade Span PK - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 31.6
Percent English LanguageLearners 6.8
Mobility Rate 16.5
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 11 out of 11 = 100%
Participation Rates 8 out of 8 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 19 out of 19 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 50 September 2016
334
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
BROADWAY EL (170902127) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
91 56 59 58
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 859 944 912 - Student Progress 670 1,200 563 - Closing Performance Gaps 948 1,600 594 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 57.8
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 58
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 1,054 Students
Grade Span PK - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 10.5
Percent English LanguageLearners 4.7
Mobility Rate 12.1
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 16 out of 16 = 100%
Participation Rates 12 out of 12 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 28 out of 28 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 51 September 2016
335
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
PATTERSON EL (170902128) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
84 43 54 51
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 534 633 842 - Student Progress 428 1,000 433 - Closing Performance Gaps 652 1,200 544 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 51.3
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 51
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 744 Students
Grade Span PK - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 73.7
Percent English LanguageLearners 45.7
Mobility Rate 20.4
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 17 out of 17 = 100%
Participation Rates 12 out of 12 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 29 out of 29 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 52 September 2016
336
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
BIRNHAM WOODS EL (170902129) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
91 48 61 62
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 827 911 912 - Student Progress 387 800 483 - Closing Performance Gaps 1,097 1,800 614 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 62.0
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 62
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 1,034 Students
Grade Span EE - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 9.5
Percent English LanguageLearners 3.8
Mobility Rate 7.5
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 14 out of 14 = 100%
Participation Rates 10 out of 10 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 24 out of 24 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 53 September 2016
337
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability SummarySTEWART EL (170902130) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
89 39 45 48
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 560 627 892 - Student Progress 236 600 393 - Closing Performance Gaps 545 1,200 454 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 48.0
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 48
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 597 Students
Grade Span PK - 06
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 22.6
Percent English LanguageLearners 3.4
Mobility Rate 17.4
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 12 out of 12 = 100%
Participation Rates 8 out of 8 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 20 out of 20 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 54 September 2016
338
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
SNYDER EL (170902131) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Met Standard
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- Student Achievement - NONE
- Student Progress
- Closing Performance Gaps
- Postsecondary Readiness
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
(Target Score=60)
Index 2
StudentProgress
(Target Score=32)
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps(Target Score=28)
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
(Target Score=12)
92 51 60 60
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement 786 850 922 - Student Progress 409 800 513 - Closing Performance Gaps 1,088 1,800 604 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score 60.0
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A 60
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
DISTINCTION EARNED
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
DISTINCTION EARNED
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
DISTINCTION EARNED
Postsecondary Readiness
NO DISTINCTION EARNED
Campus Demographics
Campus Type Elementary
Campus Size 954 Students
Grade Span EE - 04
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 17.3
Percent English LanguageLearners 3.1
Mobility Rate 8.8
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates 14 out of 14 = 100%
Participation Rates 10 out of 10 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 24 out of 24 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 55 September 2016
339
TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY2016 Accountability Summary
JUVENILE DETENTION CTR (170902201) - CONROE ISD
Accountability Rating
Not Rated
Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on
- NONE - NONE
In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campusesmust meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4.
Performance Index Report
0
25
50
75
100
Index 1
StudentAchievement
Index 2
StudentProgress
Index 3
ClosingPerformance Gaps
Index 4
PostsecondaryReadiness
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Performance Index Summary
IndexPoints
EarnedMaximum
PointsIndexScore
1 - Student Achievement N/A N/A N/A2 - Student Progress N/A N/A N/A3 - Closing Performance Gaps N/A N/A N/A4 - Postsecondary Readiness
STAAR Score N/A
Graduation Rate Score N/A
Graduation Plan Score N/A
Postsecondary Component Score N/A N/A
Distinction Designation
Academic Achievement in ELA/Reading
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Mathematics
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Science
NOT ELIGIBLE
Academic Achievement in Social Studies
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Student Progress
NOT ELIGIBLE
Top 25 Percent Closing Performance Gaps
NOT ELIGIBLE
Postsecondary Readiness
NOT ELIGIBLE
Campus Demographics
Campus Type High School
Campus Size 27 Students
Grade Span 08 - 11
Percent EconomicallyDisadvantaged 22.2
Percent English LanguageLearners 7.4
Mobility Rate 100.0
System SafeguardsNumber and Percentage of Indicators Met
Performance Rates N/A
Participation Rates 2 out of 2 = 100%
Graduation Rates N/A
Total 2 out of 2 = 100%
For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html
TEA Division of Performance Reporting Page 56 September 2016
340
Conroe Independent School District
341
Department Performance The 2015-2016 school year resulted in the achievement of goals throughout many District departments. Transportation Conroe ISD’s Transportation Department continued to make improvements to its processes by evaluating and making changes to the District Field Trip Procedures. Changes such as the use of outside vendors, addition of field trip coordinator and updated field trip software and payment process for campuses has helped make the process more efficient and cost effective.
Transportation also completed implementation of new routing and scheduling software. This implementation included finishing building all routes and completing route assignments using new software information. The department evaluated and upgraded multiple personnel positions such as bus drivers, fleet and operations managers as well as improved communication with campuses through transportation leadership. Due to the improved communication there has been shorter response times to Principals and an increase in campus visits to provide more educational material on student transportation policies and practices. Custodial & Maintenance The department continues to look for ways to improve and reduce cost. The department is devoted to researching and adding new technology to cut down on manual processes and man-hours. The use of iPads by all supervisors and most technicians in Custodial and Maintenance, has continued to increased efficiency and the processing of work orders. The improved technology has improved the response to campuses and increased communication with campus personnel regarding their maintenance and custodial needs. The department has improved and expanded the use of Docu-share, an electronic invoice processing software and electronic employee personnel files, to include the addition of automating the electronic submission and approval of the District's facility enhancement forms request. This addition will allow for continued efficiency and cost reduction as well as adding a more efficient process for managing request for campus and department facility improvements. The department has continued to train staff. Management, safety, OSHA, technology, and craft specific training was provided for the maintenance and custodial leaders and employees. In addition, all 6 Coordinators/Assistant Coordinators have achieved Texas Association of School Business Officers (TASBO) certification. This has created a work environment that continues to concentrate on safety and efficiency. This is extremely important, as the Custodial and Maintenance departments completed over 43,300 work orders with more than a 95% being complete and more than 83% completed within seven days of submission in 2015-2016.
342
Child Nutrition Child Nutrition provided quality meals and service to the students of CISD along withimplementing CISD Nutrition Guidelines that exceed Federal requirements. Additionally,the department participated in CISD Health Fair and provided information on healthyeating and weight loss to the community as well as passed out samples and recipes forhummus. To help improve the efficiency of the department new software was purchasedto better manage inventory and food purchases.
The department is constantly looking for ways to improve our staff and operations. A tenhour OSHA training class was provided to all managers to create a safer workplace andkeep safety a top priority. In addition, all managers and employees were certified or re-certified for Food Handlers Card from the Montgomery County Health Department.
343
Year National State District
2011-2012 1010 973 1051
2012-2013 1010 976 1061
2013-2014 1010 971 1064
2014-2015 1006 924 1075
2015-2016 1002 934 1056
Year National State District
2011-2012 21.1 20.8 22.9
2012-2013 20.9 20.9 23.3
2013-2014 21.0 20.9 23.5
2014-2015 21.0 20.9 24.1
2015-2016 20.8 20.6 23.2
ACT Scores
SAT Scores
Conroe Independent School District
District PerformanceSAT / ACT Results
(Combined Critical Reading & Math)
920
970
1020
1070
1120
National State District
SAT Scores
2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016
20
21
22
23
24
25
National State District
ACT Scores
2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016
344
Senior Exit Survey Results Class of 2016
1. What area(s) do you plan to pursue immediately after high school?
A. 4 year college 52.6% B. 2year college 26.2% C. Voc/tech school 1.4% D. Work full time 7.5% E. Work part time 6.8%
AB. Apprenticeship >1% AC. Military 3.2% AD. Other 1.9%
2. Gender A. Male 43.8% B. Female 46.7%
3. In which grade did you start working at an after-school job?
a. Ninth 7.9% b. Tenth 20.7% c. Eleventh 26.8% d. Twelfth 18.7% e. Not Applicable 25.9%
4. During my time at ______ High School, I was involved in extracurricular activities such as
sports, fine arts, clubs, etc. A. One year 9% B. Two years 13.3% C. Three years 12.9% D. Four years 52.6% E. Not at all 12.3%
5. My school counselors provided me with accurate and useful information.
A. Strongly agree 29.3% B. Agree 59.3% C. Disagree 9.0% D. Strongly disagree 2.3%
6. The teachers at _____High School made learning exciting and encouraged me to continue
my education. A. Strongly agree 23.0% B. Agree 64.1% C. Disagree 10.4% D. Strongly disagree 2.5%
345
7. I had enough elective choices to allow me to explore different career opportunities.A. Strongly agree 28.0% B. Agree 55.9% C. Disagree 13.3% D. Strongly disagree 2.7%
8. I believe that I will be able to find a job that will support me.A. Strongly agree 53.4% B. Agree 43.8% C. Disagree 2% D. Strongly disagree >1%
9. I experienced significant harassment from other students.A. Strongly agree 4.2% B. Agree 11.7% C. Disagree 45.0% D. Strongly disagree 39.0%
10. My teachers held high standards and required quality workA. Strongly agree 30.2% B. Agree 61.6% C. Disagree 6.4% D. Strongly disagree 1.8%
11. I had the opportunity to take higher level and more challenging courses.A. Strongly agree 50.4% B. Agree 41.3% C. Disagree 6.7% D. Strongly disagree 1.8%
12. The adults at _____ High School cared about my success.A. Strongly agree 31.9% B. Agree 58.9% C. Disagree 7.5% D. Strongly disagree 1.8%
13. I had a very good learning experience at _______High School.A. Strongly agree 31.3% B. Agree 58.1% C. Disagree 7.9% D. Strongly disagree 2.4%
14. __________High School provided a safe environment.A. Strongly agree 33.3% B. Agree 57.9% C. Disagree 6.8% D. Strongly disagree 2.4%
346
15. I feel prepared for the transition from _______High School to college or the work place.
A. Strongly agree 33.7% B. Agree 53.8% C. Disagree 9.1% D. Strongly disagree 3.3%
16. ________High School provided me a strong foundation in the use of technology.
A. Strongly agree 21.2% B. Agree 56.8% C. Disagree 17.9% D. Strongly disagree 3.8%
17. My parents have been very involved in my education.
A. Strongly agree 42.0% B. Agree 42.7% C. Disagree 11.4% D. Strongly disagree 3.7%
18. I made a strong effort to succeed at ___________High School.
A. Strongly agree 43.3% B. Agree 48.9% C. Disagree 6.3% D. Strongly disagree 1.4%
19. The College and Career Center was very helpful to me.
A. Strongly agree 43.7% B. Agree 45.8% C. Disagree 6.7% D. Strongly disagree 2.8%
20. My assistant principal was fair and consistent.
A. Strongly agree 31.8% B. Agree 57.7% C. Disagree 6.5% D. Strongly disagree 3.0%
347
Conroe Independent School District
348
Informational Section Additional Information
Conroe ISD Campus Locations
MCJDC444
16A
54
39125
158
27
3536
3720
26 34 27
3841
43
1824
21
2229
3019
17
2825 3331
9
6
10
3
23
42
45
464748
49
50
51
C B
52
Caney Creek ZoneHigh School 13 Caney Creek High SchoolJunior High School 13 Moorhead Junior HighIntermediate Schools 40 Grangerland Intermediate Elementary Schools
3 Austin Elementary 10 Creighton Elementary 6 Milam Elementary 9 San Jacinto Elementary
Oak Ridge ZoneHigh School
33 Oak Ridge High School 31 Oak Ridge HS - 9th grade campusJunior High School
52 Irons Junior High47 York Junior High
Intermediate Schools48 Cox Intermediate
17 Vogel IntermediateElementary Schools
51 Birnham Woods Elementary 46 Broadway Elementary19 Ford Elementary
28 Houser Elementary45 Kaufman Elementary25 Oak Ridge Elementary53 Snyder Elementary
The Woodlands ZoneHigh School
42 The Woodlands College Park HS& Academy of Science & Technology
34 The Woodlands High School 38 The Woodlands HS - 9th grade campusJunior High School
30 Knox Junior High32 McCullough Junior High
Intermediate Schools27 Collins Intermediate 36 Mitchell Intermediate 29 Wilkerson Intermediate
Elementary Schools37 Buckalew Elementary
35 Bush Elementary 18 David Elementary43 Deretchin K-620 Galatas Elementary
21 Glen Loch Elementary 22 Hailey Elementary23 Lamar Elementary26 Powell Elementary24 Ride Elementary
41 Tough K-6
13
53
40
14
Conroe Zone 12 Hauke Academic Alternative High School (9-12)MCJDC Montgomery County Juvenile Detention CenterHigh School
16 Conroe High School & Academy for Science & Health Professions
54 Conroe High School - 9th grade campusJunior High School
14 Peet Junior High 15 Washington Junior High Intermediate Schools
49 Bozman Intermediate 44 Cryar Intermediate39 Travis Intermediate
Elementary Schools1 Anderson Elementary2 Armstrong Elementary4 Giesinger Elementary5 Houston Elementary
56 Patterson Elementary 11 Reaves Elementary
7 Rice Elementary 8 Runyan Elementary
55 Stewart Elementary 50 Wilkinson Elementary
A Deane L. Sadler Administration/Technology Center3205 West Davis
Conroe, TX 77304-2098________________________________B CISD Police Command Center
2900 N. Loop 336 East Conroe, TX 77301________________________________C DAEP and JJAEP
2235 N. First StreetConroe, TX 77301
55
156
32
11
349
Date: Assessment: Description:
October 17 - October 28, 2016 CogAT Testing All second grade students attending CISD schools.
Fall: Sept. 26, 2016 to Jan. 27, 2017 PSAT 8/9An eighth grade assessment that measures skills students need to be on track for
success as they transition to high school.
October 17, 2016 TAKS Exit Level Retest ELA
October 18, 2016 TAKS Exit Level Retest Mathematics
October 19, 2016 TAKS Exit Level Retest Science
October 20, 2016 TAKS Exit Level Retest Social Studies
November 12, 2016 CBE
December 3, 2016 CBE
December 5, 2016 STAAR End of Course - English I
December 7, 2016 STAAR End of Course - English II
December 9, 2016 STAAR
STAAR
January 23 - February 03, 2017 Iowa/CogAT GT Assessment to identify all Gifted and Talented students within CISD Grades 2 - 12.
NAEP Scheduled Sample Assessments for Grade 4, 8 and 12
Reading, Mathematics, Science
HS Transcript Study (no grade level assigned)
April 3-21,2017 STAAR STAAR Alternate (grades 3-8 and EOC)
February 18,2017 CBE
March 25, 2017 CBE
March 6,2017 TAKS Exit Level Retest ELA
March 7, 2017 TAKS Exit Level Retest Mathematics
March 8, 2017 TAKS Exit Level Retest Science
March 9, 2017 TAKS Exit Level Retest Social Studies
March 07 - April 6, 2016 TELPAS Grades K-12 LEP Students - Listening, Speaking, Reading & Writing
March 28, 2017 STAAR Grade 4 Writing
STAAR Grade 7 Writing
Grade 5 Math
Grade 8 Math
English 1
March 29, 2017 STAAR & STAAR A Grade 5 Reading
STAAR & STAAR A Grade 8 Reading
March 30, 2017 STAAR & STAAR A English II
March 31,2017 STAAR
April 3 - April 21, 2017 STAAR Alternate 2 (grades 3-8 and EOC)
May 1-May 5,2017 STAAR Algebra I
STAAR Biology
STAAR U.S. History
2016-2017 Test Dates
Administered to all CISD students wishing to skip a grade level or test out of a high
school offered course for credit.
Administered to all CISD students wishing to skip a grade level or test out of a high
school offered course for credit.
All make-up sessions for STAAR English assessments scheduled to be
administered from Dec1-3, 2014 must be completed by end of this day.
Assessment Window
December 5-9, 2016End of Course - Algebra I, Biology, U.S. History
Assessment Window
Late January-Early March
Administered to all CISD students wishing to skip a grade level or test out of a high
school offered course for credit.
Administered to all CISD students wishing to skip a grade level or test out of a high
school offered course for credit.
All make-up sessions for STAAR assessments scheduled to be administered from
March 30 - April 1, 2016 must be completed by the
350
Date: Assessment: Description:
May 8,2017 STAAR Grade 3-4 Math
Grade 6-7 Math
Grade 5 Math (retest)
Grade 8 Math (retest)
May 9,2017 STAAR Grades 3-4 Reading
Grades 6-7 Reading
English III
Grade 5 Reading (retest)
Grade 8 Reading (retest)
May 10,2017 STAAR Grade 5 Science
Grade 8 Science
Algebra II
May 11,2017 STAAR Grade 8 Social Studies
May 12,2017 STAAR
June 20, 2017 STAAR Grade 5 Math (retest)
STAAR Grade 8 Math (retest)
June 21,2017 STAAR Grade 5 Reading (retest)
Grade 8 Reading (retest)
June 23,2017 STAAR All makeup sessions for STAAR assessments scheduled to be administered from
June 19-21,2017 must be completed by this day.
June 19, 2017 STAAR English 1
TAKS Exit Level ELA
June 20,2017 TAKS
STAAR English III
June 21,2017 TAKS Exit Level Science
June 22,2017 TAKS Exit Level Social Studies
June 23,2017 STAAR All make up sessions for STAAR English Assessments scheduled
to be administered on July 11 and July 13,2016 must be completed
by end of this day.
Assessment Window
June 19-23,2017 STAAR Algebra 1
Biology
U.S. History
June 5-7, 2017 CBE Administered to all CISD students wishing to skip a grade level or
test out of a high school offered course for credit.
August 8-10, 2017 CBE Administered to all CISD students wishing to skip a grade level or
test out of a high school offered course for credit.
Exit Level Math
All make-up sessions for STAAR assessments scheduled to beAdministered from May 8-
11,2017 must be completed by the end of this day.
2016-2017 Test Dates
351
2016-2017School Calendar
Days of Instruction Students Teachers_________________________________________________
1st Semester 79 86 _________________________________________________
2nd Semester 99 101 _________________________________________________
Total Days 178 187
Grading Periods1st Semester_________________________________________________
Grading period Ends _________________________________________________
1st October 14 _________________________________________________
2nd December 16 _________________________________________________
2nd Semester_________________________________________________ Grading period Ends _________________________________________________
1st March 10 _________________________________________________
2nd June 1 _________________________________________________
StudentsStarting date .................August 22 Ending date ........................ June 1
StaffStarting date .................August 12 Ending date ......................... June 2
Student HolidaysLabor Day................... September 5Thanksgiving .......November 21-25Winter Break........... Dec. 19 - Jan. 2 Martin Luther King ....... January 16Presidents’ Day............February 20Spring Break............... March 13-17 Holiday.............................. April 14 Memorial Day......................May 29
Teacher Work Days August 19, January 2, June 2
Staff Development August 12-18, February 20
Student Early Release October 14, December 16
Staff Make-up DaysMake-up days for inclement
weather (if needed), are: Staff: June 3
Flex
2/18/16
The Conroe Independent School District (District) as an equal opportunity educational provider and employer does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, or disability in educational programs or activities that it operates or in employment matters. The District is required by Title VI and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, Title IX of the Education Amendments
of 1972, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Americans with Disabilities Act, as well as Board policy not to discriminate in such a manner. For information about Title IX rights or Section 504/ADA rights, contact the Title IX Coordinator or the Section 504/ADA coordinator at
3205 W. Davis, Conroe, TX 77304; (936) 709-7752.
August 2016 September 2016 October 2016
November 2016 December 2016 January 2017
February 2017 March 2017 April 2017
May 2017 June 2017 July 2017
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Report Cards Individual campuses will report distribution date for report cards after each grading period.
352
GLOSSARY
This glossary contains definitions of terms used in this guide and such additional terms as seem necessary to common understandings concerning financial accounting procedures for schools. Several terms, which are not primarily financial accounting terms, have been included because of their significance for school financial accounting. The glossary is arranged alphabetically with appropriate cross-referencing where necessary.
Abatement – A complete or partial cancellation of a levy imposed by a governmental unit. Abatements usually apply to tax levies, special assessments, and service charges. School accountants usually consider an abatement to be a reduction of a previously recorded expenditure or receipt item by such things as refunds, rebates, and collections for loss or damage to school property.
Account – A descriptive heading under which are recorded financial transactions that are similar in terms of a given frame of reference such as purpose, object, or source.
Accounting Period – A period at the end of which and for which financial statements are prepared, i.e., September 1st through August 31st.
Accrual – An accrual allows an entity to record expenses and revenues for which it expects to expend cash or receive cash, respectively, in a future reporting period.
ACT – Acronym for American College Test.
ADA – Acronym for Average Daily Attendance.
Admission, Review and Dismissal (ARD) Committee– Each school district or special education shared services arrangement shall establish at least one ARD committee which shall make decisions concerning the educational program of a student referred for special education. All members of the ARD committee shall have the opportunity to participate in a collaborative manner in developing the Individual Education Plan (IEP).
Administration – Those activities that have as their purpose the general regulation, direction, and control of the affairs of the local education agency that are system-wide and not confined to one school. Subject or narrow phase of school activity.
AEIS – Acronym for Academic Excellence Indicator System.
Allocation – A part of a lump sum appropriation which is designated for expenditure by specific organization units and/or for special purposes, activities, or objects.
Appraisal – (1) The act of appraising. (2) The estimated value resulting from such action.
Appraise – To make an estimate of value, particularly of the value of property. Note, if the property is valued for purposes of taxation, the less-inclusive term “assess” is substituted for the above term.
Appropriation Account – A budgetary account set up to record specific authorization to spend. The account is credited with original and any supplemental appropriations and is charged with expenditures and encumbrances.
ARD – Acronym for Admission, Review, Dismissal.
353
Assess – To value property officially for the purpose of taxation. Note, the term is also sometimes used to denote the levy of taxes but such usage is not correct because it fails to distinguish between the valuation process and the tax levy process.
Assessed Valuation – A valuation set upon real estate or other property by a government as a
basis for levying taxes. Assets – Property owned by a local education agency that has a monetary value. Balanced Budget – A budget in which the expenditures incurred during a given period are
matched by revenues. Bill – (1) A term used to denote a law or statute passed by certain legislative bodies. A bill has
greater legal formality and standing than a resolution. (2) A statement of an amount owing for goods and services sold on open account.
Board of Education – The elected or appointed body that has been created according to State
law and vested with responsibilities for educational activities in a given geographical area. These bodies are sometimes called school boards, governing boards, boards of directors, school committees, school trustees, etc. This definition relates to the general term and covers State boards, intermediate administrative unit boards, and local basic administrative unit boards.
Bond – A written promise, generally under seal, to pay a specified sum of money, called the face
value, at a fixed time in the future, called the date of maturity, and carrying interest at a fixed rate, usually payable periodically. The difference between a note and a bond is that the latter usually runs for a longer period of time and requires greater legal formality.
Bonded Debt – The part of the school district debt which is covered by outstanding bonds of the
district, sometimes called “Funded Debt or Bonded Indebtedness.” Bonds Authorized and Unissued – Bonds which have been legally authorized but not issued
and which can be issued and sold without further authorization. Bonds Issued – Bonds sold. Bonds Payable – The face value of bonds issued and unpaid. Budget – A plan of financial operation embodying an estimate of proposed expenditures for a
given period or purpose and the proposed means of financing them. The budget usually consists of three parts. The first part contains a message from the budget-making authority together with a summary of the proposed expenditures and the means of financing them. The second part consists of schedules supporting the summary. These schedules show in detail the proposed expenditures and means of financing them together with information as to past years’ actual revenues and expenditures and other data used in making the estimates. The third part is composed of drafts of the appropriation, revenue, and borrowing measures necessary to put the budget into effect.
Budgetary Accounts – Those accounts necessary to reflect budget operations and conditions,
such as estimate revenues, appropriations, encumbrances, the net balance, and other related information.
Capital Budget – A plan of proposed capital outlays and the means of financing them for the
fiscal period. It is usually a part of the current budget. A capital program is sometimes referred to as a capital budget.
Capital Outlays – Expenditures that result in the acquisition of or addition to fixed assets.
354
Capital Program – A plan for capital expenditures to be incurred each year over a fixed period of years to meet capital needs arising from the long term work program or otherwise. It sets forth each project or other contemplated expenditure in which the local education agency is to have a part and specified the full resources estimated to be available to finance the projected expenditures.
CASE – Acronym for Community and School Engagement Rating. Cocurricular Activities – Direct and personal services for public school pupils such as
interscholastic athletics, entertainment, publications, clubs, band, and orchestra that are managed or operated by the student body under the guidance and direction of an adult and are not part of the regular instructional program.
Community Services – Those services that are provided for the community as a whole or some
segment of the community and which are not restricted to the public schools or adult education programs.
Consultant – A resource person who provides assistance to the regular personnel through
conference, demonstration, research, or other means. There are two types of consultants – those retained on a temporary basis and those who are permanently employed.
Contracted Services – Labor, material, and other costs for services rendered by personnel who
are not on the payroll of the local education agency. Current – As used in this manual, the term has reference to the fiscal year in progress. Current Expenditures Per Pupil – Current expenditures for a given period of time divided by a
pupil unit of measure (average daily membership, average daily attendance, etc.) Current Year’s Tax Levy – Taxes levied for the current fiscal period. Debt – An obligation resulting from the borrowing of money or from the purchase of goods and
services. Debts of local education agencies include bonds, warrants, notes, etc. Debt Limit – The maximum amount of gross or net debt that is legally permitted. Debt Service Fund – A fund used to account for the accumulation of resources and payment of
principal and interest on all bonds. Deficit – The excess of the obligations of a fund over the fund’s resources. Delinquent Taxes – Taxes remaining unpaid on and after the date on which they become
delinquent by statute. DTR – Acronym for District Tax Rate. Estimated Revenue – When the accounts are kept on an accrual basis, this term designates the
amount of revenue estimated to accrue during a given period regardless of whether or not it is all to be collected during the period.
Expenditures – This includes total charges incurred, whether paid or unpaid, for current
expense, capital outlay, and debt service. (Transfers between funds, encumbrances, and payments of cash in settlement of liabilities already accounted as expenditures are not considered as expenditures.)
Expenses – Charges incurred, whether paid of unpaid, for operation, maintenance, interest, and
other charges that are presumed to benefit the current fiscal period.
355
Fiscal Year – A twelve-month period of time to which the annual budget applies and at the end of which a local education agency determines its financial position and the results of its operations.
Fixed Assets – Land, building, machinery, furniture, and other equipment that the school district
intends to hold or continue to use over a long period of time. “Fixed” denotes probability or intent to continue use or possession and does not indicate immobility of an asset.
Food Service - Those activities which have as their purpose the preparation and serving of
regular and incidental meals, lunches, or snacks in connection with school activities. FTE – Acronym for full-time equivalent. Function – As applied to expenditures, this term has reference to an activity or service aimed at
accomplishing a certain purpose or end; for example, instruction, instructional administration, plant maintenance and operations.
Fund – A sum of money or other resources set-aside for specific activities of a school district.
The fund accounts constitute a complete entity and all of the financial transactions for the particular fund are recorded in them.
Fund Balance – The excess of assets of a fund over its liabilities and reserves. During the fiscal
year prior to closing, it represents the excess of the fund’s assets and estimated revenues for the period over its liabilities, reserves, and appropriations for the period.
GAAP – Acronym for Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. General Fund – A fund used to finance the ordinary operations of the local education agency. It
is available for a legally authorized purpose and consists of money not specifically designated for some other particular purpose.
Instruction – The activities dealing directly with the teaching of students or improving the quality
of teaching. Interest – A fee charged a borrower for the use of money. Inventory – A detailed list or record showing quantities, descriptions, values, units of measure,
and unit prices of property on hand. I & S – Acronym for Interest & Sinking Fund (Debt Service Fund). ISD – Acronym for Independent School District. Levy – (Verb) To impose taxes or special assessments. (Noun) The total of taxes or special
assessments imposed by a governmental unit. Long Term Loan – A loan which extends for more than five years from the date the loan was
obtained and is not secured by serial or term bonds. Such loans are not legal in Texas under the general statutes.
M & O – Acronym for Maintenance and Operations Fund (General Fund). Modified Accrual Basis of Accounting – A basis of accounting in which expenditures are
accrued but revenues are accounted for when it becomes measurable and available. Object – As applied to expenditures, this term has reference to an article or service received; for
example, payroll costs, purchased and contracted services, materials and supplies.
356
Payroll – A list of individual employees entitled to pay with the amount due to each for personal services rendered.
Personnel, Full Time – School employees who occupy positions whose duties require them to
be on the job on school days throughout the school year or at least the number of hours the schools in the system are in session.
Personnel, Part Time – Personnel who occupy positions whose duties require less than full time
service. This includes those employed full time for part of the school year, part time for all of the school year and part time for part of the school year. See also Personnel, Full Time.
Plant Maintenance (Plant Repairs and Repairs and Replacements of Equipment) – Those
activities which are concerned with keeping the grounds, buildings and equipment at their original condition, completeness or efficiency either through repairs or by replacements of property (anything less than replacement of a total building).
Principal of a School – The administrative head of a school (not school district) to whom has
been delegated the major responsibility for the coordination and supervision of the activities of the school.
Principal of Bonds – The face value of bonds. Program – The definition of an effort to accomplish a specific objective or objectives consistent
with funds or resources available. Budgets and actual revenue and expenditure records may be maintained per program.
Program Budget – A budget wherein expenditures are based primarily on programs of work and
secondarily on character and object. A program budget is a transitional type of budget between the traditional character and object number on the one hand and the performance budget on the other.
NCLB – Acronym for No Child Left Behind. Refunding Bonds – Bonds issued to pay off bonds already outstanding. Refined Average Daily Attendance – Refined average daily attendance is based on the number
of days of instruction in the school year. The aggregate eligible days attendance is divided by the number of days of instruction to compute the refined average daily attendance.
Reimbursement – Cash or other assets received as a repayment of the cost of work or services
performed or of other expenditures made for, or on behalf of, another governmental unit or department, individual, firm, or corporation.
Reserve – An amount set aside for a specified purpose or an account which records a portion of
the fund balance which is to be segregated for some future use and, therefore, is not available for further appropriation and expenditure.
"Robin Hood" Plan Chapter 41 Wealth Equalization. Chapter 41 of the Texas Education Code
requires school districts that are property wealthy to share their wealth with school districts that are property poor. Also sometimes referred to as the "share the wealth".
Salary – The total amount regularly paid or stipulated to be paid to an individual before
deductions for personal services rendered while on the payroll of the school district. Payments for sabbatical leave are also considered as salary.
SAT – Acronym for Standardized Achievement Tests.
357
School – A division of the school system consisting of a group of pupils composed of one or more teachers to give instruction of a defined type and housed in a school plant of one or more buildings. More than one school may be housed in one school plant as is the case when the elementary and secondary programs are housed in the same school plant.
School, Elementary – A school classified as elementary by State and local practice and
composed of any span of grades not above grade six. In this District this term includes kindergartens and pre-kindergartens if they are under the control of the local board of education.
School, Intermediate – A separately organized intermediate elementary school between early
elementary and middle school. In this District intermediate schools include grades five and six.
School, Junior High – A separately organized secondary school between elementary,
intermediate, and senior high school. In this District junior high schools include grades seven and eight.
School, Public – A school operated by publicly elected or appointed school officials in which the
program and activities are under the control of these officials and which is supported by public funds.
School, Secondary – In this handbook a secondary school comprises any span of grades
beginning with the next grade following the elementary/intermediate school and ending with or below grade 12, including junior high schools, the different type of high schools and alternative high schools.
School, Senior High – A school offering the final years of high school work necessary for
graduation, invariably preceded by a junior high school in the same system. School, Summer – The name applied to the school session carried on during the period between
the end of the regular school term and the beginning of the next regular school term. SDAA – Acronym for State Developed Alternative Assessment. Serial Bonds – Bonds whose principal is to be repaid in periodic installments over the life of the
issue. STAAR – Acronym for State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness STaR Chart – Texas School Technology and Readiness Chart is designed to help teachers,
campuses, and districts determine their progress toward meeting the goals of the Long-Range Plan for Technology as well as meeting the goals of the district.
State Aid for Education – Any grant made by a State government for the support of education. Student Wealth – Assessed value of property divided by school enrollment. Supplemental Taxes – Taxes levied subsequent to the initial levy to add property omitted from
the original tax roll(s). Supply – A material item of an expendable nature that is consumed, worn out, or deteriorated in
use or one that loses its identity through fabrication or incorporation into a different or more complex unit or substance.
TAAS – Acronym for Texas Assessment Academic Skills exam. TAKS – Acronym for Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills exam.
358
Taxes – Compulsory charges levied by a governmental unit for the purpose of financing services
performed for the common benefit. The term includes licenses and permits. It does not include special assessments.
TEA – Acronym for Texas Education Agency. TRS – Acronym for Teacher Retirement System. Unencumbered Balance of Appropriation – That portion of an appropriation not yet expended
or encumbered. The balance remaining after deducting from the appropriation the accumulated expenditures and outstanding encumbrances.
Unexpended Balance of Appropriation – That portion of an appropriation not yet expended.
The balance remaining after deducting from the appropriation the accumulated expenditures.
Unit Cost – Expenditures for a function, activity, or service divided by the total number of units for
which the function, activity, or service was provided. WADA – Acronym for Weighted Average Daily Attendance.
359
Conroe Independent School District
360
3205 West Davis Conroe, Texas 77304-2098
www.conroeisd.net