can heart disease and cancer be prevented

7/29/2019 Can Heart Disease and Cancer Be Prevented

1/45

Can Heart Disease and Cancer be prevented? Over 2 Million

Americans were needlessly killed last year by Heart Diseaseand Cancer---- It is 100% preventable! --- 2 out of 3 have it!Get your FREE test kit now! Before YOU become the nextstatistic??? Go Here!

15 Signs of Cancer

1. Losing weight at a rapid rate (among people not being on a diet), gasses, discomfort,digestive disorders, anorexia, recurring diarrhoea, constipation are the symptoms

occurring most frequently in case of lung, stomach, kidney and large intestine cancer.If accompanied by a feeling of weakness, it can be a sign of blood loss or lack ofproper elements building it.

2. Pain of unknown cause long-lasting stomach-ache can be the symptom of largeintestine cancer, lumbalgia can be the sign of kidney cancer, pain in the chest can resultfrom lung cancer. Bone aches can be caused by metastasis.

3. Haemoptysis, long-lasting hoarseness (over 3 weeks), persistent cough or change ofits character can be caused by lung or larynx cancer.

4. Change in colour of moles and warts, ulceration and itching, ulceration of openwounds, burns and scalds can be the signs of skin cancer.

5. Excessive production of urine, backlog of urine, painful urinating, slow, time-consuming flow of urine, lumbago as well as backache can be the signs of prostatecancer.

6. Pain, vertigo, nausea, sight distortions (oversensitized sight, astigmatism), hearingimpediment, upset balance and mental disorders can result from brain cancer.

7. Swallowing difficulties can be a symptom of throat, larynx, oesophagus andstomach cancer.

8. Feeling of fullness in epigastrium, aches and digestive disorders may be due tostomach cancer and other kinds of alimentary canal cancer, sometimes ovary cancer.

9. Blood in faeces, black faeces, alternating diarrhoea and constipation, mucus infaeces, narrow (pencil-like) faeces are the symptoms of alimentary canal cancer,especially of large intestine and rectum.

10. Blood in urine (without the symptoms of urinary tracks inflammation), dysuria(compulsive urination, difficulties in urination) can accompany the urinary trackscancer.


2/45

11. Improper bleeding from the genital tracks, pink or dark-red vaginal discharges,hypogastrium and lower limbs ache can be the signs of vagina, uterine cervix anduterus cancer.

12. Marks on skin and mucosus membrane (lips, oral cavity, genitals): not healing

ulceration, change in marks appearance, occurrence of new skin marks of somespecific features (irregular distribution of pigment, vague line between the mark andhealthy skin, quick growth of the marks, bleeding, dripping).

13. Breast tumour (by approximately 15% - 25% can be impalpable), ulceration, theretraction of nipple, asymmetrical nipples, change of size or the shape of a nipple, itsswelling and the marks around it, enlargement of lymphatic glands in the armpit,extension of veins in the breast skin, ulceration of breast skin, shoulder swelling, flatefflorescene in case of the so called advanced inflammation nipple cancer are oftenthe symptoms of breast cancer.

14. Fever, tiredness, bones and joints ache, inclination to temporary anaemia andbleeding, impalpable tumour of abdominal cavity, as a result of spleen enlargement,that can be detected in gastro-bowel test.

15. Pain and pressure in the upper right part of stomach, tiredness, anorexia and at afurther stage of rhe disease a palpable tumour in the upper right part of stomach,inclination to jaundice and bleeding can be the signs of liver cancer.

Article Source: http://www.articlerich.com

www.ashnow.com/cancerbusters
http://www.articlerich.com/http://www.ashnow.com/cancerbustershttp://www.articlerich.com/http://www.ashnow.com/cancerbusters


3/45

The Underlying Causes of Cancer

Cancerous cells are always being created in the body. It's an ongoingprocess that has gone on for eons. Specific parts of your immune

system are designed to seek out and destroy cancer cells.

Cancer has been around as long as mankind, but only in the second

half of the 20th century did the number of cancer cases explode.Contributing to this explosion are the excessive amounts of toxins and

pollutants we are exposed to, high stress lifestyles that zap the

immune system, poor quality junk food that's full of pesticides,irradiated and now genetically modified, pathogens, electromagnetic

stress, lights, and just about everything that wasn't here 200 yearsago.

All these weaken the immune system, and alter the internal

environment in the body to an environment that promotes the growthof cancer.

Cancer is not a mysterious disease that suddenly attacks you out of

the blue, something that you can't do anything about. It has definite

causes that you can correct if your body has enough time, and if youtake action to change the internal environment to one that creates

health, not cancer, while at the same time attacking cancerous cellsand tumors by exploiting their weaknesses.

Cancer tumors begin when more cancerous cells are being createdthan an overworked, depleted immune system can destroy.

Constant exposure to tens of thousands of manmade chemicals from

birth onward, chlorinated and fluoridated water, electromagneticradiation, pesticides and other toxins, leads to the creation of too

many free radicals and excessive numbers of cancerous cells.

Alone this would be enough to raise cancer levels, but combined with

an immune system weakened by a diet of refined and over processedfood, mineral depleted soils, and too much exposure to artificial light

at night, the immune system at some point no longer is able to keepcancer in check, and it starts to grow in your body.

DID YOU KNOW? Research shows that the immune system needs 91/2 hours of sleep in totaldarkness to recharge completely -- the

authors of the book Lights Outexplain. When was the last time you

had this much sleep?


4/45

Because of this stress and the overload of toxins, you end up with a

malfunctioning immune system, and a body that is not capable ofdestroying the excessive numbers of cancerous cells that develop.

Some, sooner or later, survive and multiply. And then you have

cancer. Of course, diets loaded with sugar and refined carbohydratesdon't help. Refined carbohydrates digest so fast they act like sugar,

and cancer cells love sugar. They have about 8 times more receptorcells for capturing sugar than healthy cells so eating sugar or refined

carbohydrates feeds your cancer.

Overcoming cancer is a process ofreversing the conditions that

allowed the cancer to develop, while going after and killing cancerouscells.

The exact causes don't have to be known, though certainly the morevaried the approaches taken to correct those conditions, the more

likely you are going to hit on what works best in a particular case.What you need to do is to strongly and dramatically interrupt and

reverse the cancer-causing conditions in your body so that it becomeshealthier, and stops breeding cancer.

The more cancer there is, the more serious the condition -- meaningmuch more has to be done -- fast. It may be too late, or it may not.

No one knows where that cutoff point is as sometimes people givenonly a few days to live have pulled through and conquered cancer

when they applied these strategies.

The information in the e-book 11 Natural Therapies To Conquer Cancer

isn't about a a single medical cure for cancer. It isn't medical advice. Itis sort of like information from the National Cancer Society that one of

the most important things you can do for your health is to eat five

servings of fruits and vegetables a day. In this case though, you willlearn about food supplements, minerals and energetic therapies that

are much more potent. Able to wipe out any and all of the cancer cellsin your body.

There is an overwhelming number of ways and supplements that havehelped people overcome cancer. Many therapies are good and help a

small percentage of users. A few are excellent and fewer still aregreat. In 12 Natural Therapies To Conquer Cancer we help you

focus on the very best cancer fighters so that you dont waste yourtime and money, and possibly your life, on therapies that arent potent

enough to beat your cancer. In this free report you are reading now,


5/45

we will briefly cover the 12 most important strategies to use whenfighting cancer. The e-book gives you the specifics and even rates

therapies in order of importance. So lets get started with one of themost basic of therapies.

12 Important Cancer Strategies

Cancer Strategy #1: Kill Cancer Cells...Without Harming Your Body

When chemotherapy and radiation therapy are used to kill the

cancerous cells, they harm healthy cells in the process. In fact, theysometimes kill people faster than the cancer would have done. This

report focuses on natural supplements that do a good job of killingcancerous cells, but don't cause harm to your body. A few natural

supplements suggested for fighting cancer do have the potential to be

toxic to the body, and should probably just be used in conjunction witha naturopath or alternative doctor. These include cesium, artemisia,

and B17. In this report you will learn only about completely safecancer supplements that can be used with no supervision.

You may well ask why, if a safe and natural product is able to kill

cancer, doesn't your doctor recommend it. Of course, he probably

doesn't know about it, but even if he did, he's not likely to use it.

It's the nature of the medical/drug industry. Doctors use andrecommend drugs that are approved in a process that costs hundreds

of millions of dollars. The drug companies only make drugs that can be

patented. That way they can sell them for huge mark-ups and have nocompetition. Unfortunately, anything that has been altered from

nature, which it must be to be patented, becomes a toxic substance inyour body. Your body can handle natural foods and herbs, the altered

ones have toxic side-effects and just don't work well in your body. It's

why the biggest cause of deaths in the US is from medical drugs.

No company would ever take an unpatentable natural product throughthe drug approval process, so the healthy natural supplements aren't

approved to be used for cancer or whatever other health condition

they may help. As they are not approved, doctors, or at least mostdoctors, won't use them, and most don't even know about them.


6/45

If a doctor is not tied in and blinded by the medical/drug industry, heor she finds that a comprehensive approach to fighting cancer using

powerful supplements that deal with the many different issues incancer, works much better than only using drugs and other treatments

that harm the body. But for now you have to turn to other resources

to find safe cancer killers.

In this section, you will learn about the most effective cancer killerthis author has seen. Better still, while there are many versions of this

cancer killing volcanic mineral, you will learn in our e-book which one

goes way beyond the others in healing power. And we give you oneother new and unique product that youve never heard of before - easy

to take - that is one of the best cancer killers we have seen - thoughnot quite as good as our first recommendation.

Cancer Strategy #2: Low Levels Of Cellular Oxygen BreedCancer...

Increasing Oxygen Levels Kills Cancerous Cells

An underlying cause of cancer is low cellular oxygenation levels. Innewly formed cells, low levels of oxygen damage respiration enzymes

so that they cells cannot produce energy using oxygen. These cells can

then turn cancerous.

In 1931 Dr. Warburg won his first Nobel Prize for proving cancer iscaused by a lack of oxygen respiration in cells. He stated in an article

titled The Prime Cause and Prevention of Cancerthat "the causeof cancer is no longer a mystery, we know it occurs whenever

any cell is denied 60% of its oxygen requirements."

"Cancer, above all other diseases, has countless secondary causes.

But, even for cancer, there is only one prime cause. Summarized in a

few words, the prime cause of cancer is the replacement of therespiration of oxygen in normal body cells by a fermentation of sugar.

All normal body cells meet their energy needs by respiration ofoxygen, whereas cancer cells meet their energy needs in great

part by fermentation. All normal body cells are thus obligateaerobes, whereas all cancer cells are partial anaerobes."

Poor oxygenation comes from a buildup of carcinogens and othertoxins within and around cells, which blocks and then damages the

cellular oxygen respiration mechanism. Clumping up of red blood cellsslows down the bloodstream, and restricts flow into capillaries. This

also causes poor oxygenation. Even lack of the proper building blocks


7/45

for cell walls, essential fatty acids, restricts oxygen exchange.

(This is why the flax oil in cottage cheese treatment popular inEurope - 2 tablespoons of organic, refrigerated flax oil or

freshly ground flax seed mixed in some cottage cheese - has

become a well known cancer treatment. It provides essentialfatty acids needed by cell walls so that oxygen can enter the

cells.)

What Warburg and other scientists found was that respiratory enzymes

in cells, which make energy aerobically using oxygen, die when cellularoxygen levels drop.

When this happens, the cell can no longer produce energy aerobically.

So, if the cell is to live, it must, at least partially, ferment sugars,

producing energy anaerobically.

According to Warburg, cells that produce energy by fermenting sugarsmay turn cancerous. Warburg's contention is this...

The cells that cannot produce energy aerobically, cannot produce

enough energy to maintain their ability to function properly. So they

lose their ability to do whatever they need to do in the body.

Fermentation allows these cells to survive, but they can no longerperform any functions in the body or communicate effectively with the

body. Consequently, these cells can only multiply and grow. And maybecome cancerous. Or perhaps it would be more accurate to say, they

change into cancer cells.

Decades ago, two researchers at the National Cancer Institute, Dean

Burn and Mark Woods, (Dean translated some of Warburg's speeches)

conducted a series of experiments where they measured thefermentation rate of cancers that grew at different speeds. What they

found supported Dr. Warburg's theory. The cancers with the highestgrowth rates had the highest fermentation rates. The slower a cancer

grew, the less it used fermentation to produce energy.

Naturally Warburg's contention was challenged and tested by other

scientists.Some researchers claimed his theory was not valid after they had

measured a particularly slow growing cancer, and found nofermentation at all. And if cancer could grow with no fermentation,

then fermentation, or lack of oxygen respiration, was not the cause of


8/45

cancer. Dean Burn and Mark Woods checked those results.Using more sophisticated equipment, they determined that the

equipment these researchers used to measure fermentation levels wasnot accurate enough to detect fermentation at low levels. Their

testing, using newer and more accurate equipment, showed that even

in those very slow growing cancer cells, fermentation was still takingplace, at very low levels.

Pietro Gullino, also at the National Cancer Institute, devised a test

which showed that this slow growing cancer always produced

fermentation lactic acid. Silvio Fiala, a biochemist from the Universityof Southern California, also confirmed that this slow growing cancer

produced lactic acid, and that it's oxygen respiration was reduced.

Further research into Warburg's theory showed that when oxygen

levels were turned down, cells began to produce energy anaerobically.They ultimately became cancerous when levels went low enough. It

took a reduction of 35% in oxygen levels for this to happen.

J. B. Kizer, a biochemist and physicist at Gungnir Research inPortsmith, Ohio explains, "Since Warburg's discovery, this difference in

respiration has remained the most fundamental (and some say, only)

physiological difference consistently found between normal and cancercells. Using cell culture studies, I decided to examine the differential

responses of normal and cancer cells to changes in the oxygenenvironment.

"The results that I found were rather remarkable. I found that... "High02 tensions were lethal to cancer tissue, 95 percent being very

toxic, whereas in general, normal tissues were not harmed by highoxygen tensions. Indeed, some normal tissues were found to require

high 02 tensions. It does seem to demonstrate the possibility that if

the 02 tensions in cancer tissues can be elevated, then the cancertissue may be able to be killed selectively, as it seems that the cancer

cells are incapable of handling the 02 in a high 02 environment."

Low oxygen levels in cells may be a fundamental cause of cancer.There are several reasons cells become poorly oxygenated. Anoverload of toxins clogging up the cells, poor quality cell walls that

don't allow nutrients into the cells, the lack of nutrients needed forrespiration, poor circulation and perhaps even low levels of oxygen in

the air we breathe.

Cancer cells produce excess lactic acidas they ferment energy. Lactic


9/45

acid is toxic, and tends to prevent the transport of oxygen intoneighboring normal cells. Over time as these cells replicate, the cancer

may spread if not destroyed by the immune system.

Chemotherapy and radiation are used because cancer cells are

weaker than normal cells and therefore may die first.

However, chemo and radiation damage respiratory enzymes inhealthy cells, and overload them with toxins, so they become more

likely to develop into cancer. The underlying cancer causing conditions

are worsened, not improved. And the cancer usually returns quickly asecond time unless you make changes to support the health of your

body.

The implication of this research is that an effective way to support the

body's fight against cancer would be to get as much oxygen as youcan into healthy cells, and improving their ability to utilize oxygen.

Raising the oxygen levels of normal cells would help prevent themfrom becoming cancerous.

And increasing oxygen levels in cancer cells to high levels could help

kill those cancer cells.

A nurse who works in medical research said, "It's so simple. I don't

know why I never thought of it before. When we're working with cellcultures in the lab, if we want the cells to mutate, we turn down the

oxygen. To stop them, we turn the oxygen back up."

Ma Lan, MD and Joel Wallach DVD, point out that one type of white

blood cells kills cancer cells by injecting oxygen creating hydrogenperoxide into the cells.

It is not easy to get additional oxygen into cells. Most approachesdon't work well. Breathing oxygen is still limited by the amount of

hemoglobin available, and pH levels. Dr. Whittaker points out, quiterightly, that liquid oxygen supplements that release oxygen into the

blood, which most of them only do, can'tget oxygen into the cells.

He explains that a delivery mechanism is needed to transport oxygen

into cells. And though the typical oxygen supplement gets oxygen intothe blood, that doesn't mean it gets into the cells.

So what can you do to increase oxygen levels in your cells? The 11

Natural Therapies To Conquer Cancer e-book gives you not one, but


10/45

two supplements that have the ability to get more oxygen into yourcells.

There is a bit more to this oxygenation story.

If you remember, according to Warburg, it is increased amounts ofcarcinogens, toxicity and pollution that cause cells to be unable to

uptake oxygen efficiently. This is connected with over-acidity.

Cancer Strategy #3: Acidic pH Levels Lead To Cancer...

Normalizing pH Levels Can Stop Cancer In Its Tracks

There is plenty of research showing that cancer thrives in an acidicenvironment, and doesn't survive in a normal, more alkaline

environment. Cancer cells make your body even more acidic as they

produce lactic acid. So if you have cancer, your pH levels are low andyour body is too acidic.

Taking action to make your body more alkaline is vital in the battle

against cancer. Unfortunately...

The majority of the foods and drinks we consume are acidic, such as

meat, grains and sugar, with colas and other soft drinks being highlyacidic. So unless you have been eating a very healthy diet, full of fresh

fruit and vegetables, your body is way too acidic. Creating a very goodenvironment for cancer to grow in.

Actually, too much acidity is an underlying factor in many degenerativediseases -- diabetes, arthritis, fibromyalgia and more. A basic maxim

of natural physicians is: Balance the bio terrain. Do this first, theneverything can come back to normal.

Taking medicines or supplements while your body is highly acidic is a

bit like washing dishes in a sink of dirty water, even when you put inplenty of soap, you can't get the dishes clean.

According to Keiichi Morishita in his book, Hidden Truth of Cancer,

when your blood starts to become acidic, your body deposits acidicsubstances in the blood (usually toxins) into cells to allow the blood toremain slightly alkaline. However, this causes your cells to become

more acidic and toxic, which results in a decrease of their oxygenlevels, and harms their DNA and respiratory enzymes.

Over time, he theorizes, these cells increase in acidity and some die.

These dead cells themselves turn into acids. However, some of these


11/45

acidified cells may adapt in that environment. In other words, insteadof dying - as normal cells do in an acid environment - some cells

survive by becoming abnormal cells.

These abnormal cells are called malignant cells. Malignant cells do not

correspond with brain function nor with our own DNA memory code.Therefore, malignant cells grow indefinitely and without order. This is

cancer.

As you can see, he is describing, from a different point of view, the

process by which low oxygen levels turn some cells cancerous. Alkalinewater (including the water in cells) holds a lot of oxygen. Acidic water

holds very little oxygen. So the more acidic your cells are, the lessoxygenated they will be. To make matters worse, the fermentation

process cancer cells use to produce energy creates lactic acid, further

increasing acidity and reducing oxygen levels.

Sang Whang, in his book Reverse Aging, points out that toxins areacidic. If your blood is too acidic, toxins will not be released from your

cells into the blood. So your cells can't be detoxified. This buildup oftoxins in your cells results in acidic, poorly oxygenated cells, which can

turn cancerous. He explains,

"In general, degenerative diseases are the result of acid waste

buildups within us. When we are born, we have the highest alkalinemineral concentration and also the highest body pH. From that point

on, the normal process of life is to gradually acidify. That is why thesedegenerative diseases do not occur when you are young. Reverseaging requires two separate steps: chemical and physical. The first

step is to lower the acidity of the body so that it can dispose of acidicwastes in the blood and cellular fluids safely and easily. The second

step is to physically pull out old stored wastes into the blood stream so

that they can be discharged from the body."

There is a long history of reversing cancer simply by alkalinizing thebody. It is one of the basic strategies in the battle against cancer, and

for improving your health in general.

Not only does the e-book tell you what cancer killing and oxygenating

supplements will also boost your alkalinity, without having to spend apenny more for pH adjusting products, but you will read about a super

way to raise your pH levels for only a penny or two a day. Thisinformation alone will more than cover the cost of the e-book.


12/45

Cancer Strategy #4: Lack Of Methylglyoxal Causes Cancer...Getting Methylglyoxal Into Cells Puts The Brakes On Cancer

Dr. Albert Szent-Gyorgyi was the Nobel Laureate in Medicine in 1937

for the isolation and discovery of Vitamin C. Known as the "Father of

Nutritional Science", he also discovered iso-flavones and vitamin P. Inhis last 40 years, he researched the regulatory processes of cell

growth, and thereby the regulation of cancer itself.

He made a rather amazing breakthrough about cancer. In 1963 the

prestigious magazine "Science" published a remarkable article abouthis research. In it Dr. Szent-Gyorgyi identified two substances, one

called Retine, which inhibited cancer growth, and the othercalled Promine, which promoted cell growth and made

cancerous cells grow faster.

He explained that these were very small molecules that were highly

potent in controlling cell division. His research using mice achievedshrinkage of tumors by increasing the ratio of Retine to Promine with

daily injections of Retine. Other researchers obtained similar results.

There were no harmful or toxic side effects.

In another "Science" article in 1967 he announced that his laboratory

had isolated and manufactured Retine, which retards cell growth, inthe form of a Carbonyl compound called Methylglyoxal.

Again, in animal studies he showed that injecting Methylglyoxal dailyinto mice with cancer was highly effective. The study was divided up

into 5 groups of 20 mice each. Every mouse in the control group diedin the first 26 - 34 days. All mice were observed for 300 days. The first

group began treatment 1 hour after inoculation with cancer. 15

survived.

In the second group, beginning treatment 4 hours after inoculation, 13animals survived. The third group began treatment 24 hours

afterwards and 7 survived. The fourth group waited 48 hours and 4survived.

In an interview in Prevention magazine in 1972 conducted by JaneKinderlehrer, he explained that he and "Dr. Egyud have found that

retine (methylglyoxal) stops the growth of cancer cells withoutpoisoning other cells. When retine is present in sufficient

concentration, no cell division can occur while vital cellular processes


13/45

go on unhindered."

The article goes on, "And what is a good bit of luck, and not mycleverness, the white-haired scientist pointed out, "is that if a cancer

cell cannot grow, it dies by itself.' According to the researchers, retine

is normally produced by the body and, when it is, it prevents thegrowth of existing cancer cells. But the body can lose its ability to

produce this substance...

"Putting the retine back in the body, just as we put insulin back into a

diabetic's body, can stop the growth of cancer... The scientists atWoods Hole found that cancer cells are much more sensitive to retine

than normal ones, and so cancer cells may be inhibited specifically."

To sum it up, the Carbonyl group - Glyoxal & Methylglyoxal, are retine.

They arrest cell division and make cells return to a resting state. IfCarbonyl is missing, uncontrolled proliferation goes on, and cells grow

wildly and uncontrollably which leads to cancer. Glyoxal &Methylglyoxal are a non-toxic substance that is supposed to be in your

cells. Putting them back in your cells has significant anti-canceractivity.

Another well known Nobel Prize winner of that period, Dr. WilliamKoch, worked on this same issue with a different approach. Dr. Szent-

Gyorgyi acknowledged his work saying, "A decade ago, a very intuitiveresearcher, Dr. William F. Koch, came to the same conclusion about

the possible importance of Carbonyls in regulation of cell division andcarcinostasis."

While both work best when used together, one of these twosupplements is a much stronger cancer killer than the other. The 11

Natural Therapies To Conquer Cancer e-book will tell you which one is

the most important to use, and give you its only source.

Cancer Strategy #5: A Weakened Immune System Leads ToCancer...

A Strong Immune System Seeks Out And Destroys Cancer Cells

For most of your life, the immune system has successfully dealt with

cancer cells, killing them off as they developed. That's its job. Forcancer to have developed in you, your immune system must have

become worn out, ineffective and unable to deal with the cancer cells.

Thus it is vital to strengthen the immune system so that it can better


14/45

fight cancer. Especially if you are getting medical treatments that wipeout the immune system, and make the body more acidic to boot.

Many natural supplements support the immune system. The trick is

the find and use the ones that work the best, as it is easy to squander

resources on products that won't get the job done. The other concernis to make sure you take enough. Cancer is not something to

pussyfoot around with. Taking 5 to 10 times the normal supplementalamount seems to work best when using natural supplements.

The 11 Natural Therapies e-book gives you seven or eight of the bestimmune system boosters, and even tells you which are the most

important ones to use first.

Cancer Strategy #6: Candida And Fungal Infections May Cause

Cancer...Eliminating These Fungal Infections Is Vital For Getting Rid Of

Cancer

Some doctors theorize that candida or other systemic fungal infectionscause or at the very least contribute to the development of cancer.

This makes sense. A body wide candida infection plays havoc on the

immune system. Not only does the immune system becomeoverwhelmed and worn out from fighting the infection, but candida (or

other fungus) excrete toxins that further weaken and harm the body.

The major waste product of candida is acetaldehyde, which producesethanol. Ethanol may be great in cars, but in your body it causes

excessive fatigue, and reduces strength and stamina. In addition, itdestroys enzymes needed for cell energy, and causes the release of

free radicals that can damage DNA.

Ethanol also inhibits the absorption of iron. Because iron is one of the

most important oxygen supports in the blood, ethanol in your bodycreates low oxygen levels. And you know what happens when your

body can't oxygenate well. Deal with candida if you want to beatcancer.

Some doctors implicate fungi as a cause ofleukemia. In 1999 MeinolfKarthaus, MD, watched three different children with leukemia suddenly

go into remission upon receiving a triple antifungal drug cocktail fortheir "secondary" fungal infections.

In 1997 Mark Bielski stated that leukemia, whether acute or chronic, is


15/45

intimately associated with the yeast, Candida albicans, which mutatesinto a fungal form when it overgrows.

Milton White, MD. believed that cancer is a chronic, infectious,

fungus disease. He was able to find fungal spores in every sample of

cancer tissue he studied. Other doctors feel the same. The cancerfighting strategy one Italian MD uses is to attack the candida by

alkalinizing the digestive tract. He has his patients drink a teaspoon ofbicarbonate of soda, baking soda, in a glass of water 30 minutes

before breakfast. Some of his patients eliminate their cancer just doing

this. We suggest using at least 3 teaspoons a day, and have heard ofpeople using as much as 10 teaspoons being used daily in 5 quarts of

water.

Author Doug Kaufmann asserts that fungi in foods may play a role in

cancer. He has seen children become free of their documentedleukemia once the child's parents simply changed the child's diet.

Kaufmann's diet is base on the widely published problem of mycotoxincontamination of our grain foods.

Grains such as corn, wheat, barley, sorghum, and other foods such as

peanuts, are commonly contaminated with cancer-causing fungal

poisons called mycotoxins. One of them, called aflatoxin, just happensto be the mostcarcinogenic substance on earth.

He says we consume, on average, from 0.15mg to 0.5mg of aflatoxin

per day. So it is not sugar alone that is the problem in our westerndiet, but fungal toxins that are found in the sugary grains. More thanonce has Kaufmann interviewed a caller (on his health talk show) who

absolutely craved peanut butter and popcorn just prior to theirdiagnosis of cancer.

Kaufmann feels that antibiotics may play a role in this. Antibioticsdestroy the normal, protective gut bacteria, allowing intestinal yeast

and fungi to grow unchecked. Resulting in Candida overgrowth. Thiscan lead to immune suppression, symptoms of autoimmune diseases,

or even cancer.

"If the onset of any symptom or disease, cancer included, was

preceded by a course of antibiotics," he says, "then look for a fungusto be at the root of your problem."

In the 11 Natural Therapies e-book you will read about a simple and

free test you can give yourself to see if indeed you have candida


16/45

overgrowth. And then learn what is the single best product to fight thecandida. (It will help kill cancer cells too!)

Cancer Strategy #7: Toxins (Genetically Modified Foods &

Chlorine) Cause Cancer... Reducing Toxic Overload Vital For

Eliminating Cancer

An eminent German oncologist says that cancer is caused byenvironmental toxins. Others agree. While there are obviously other

issues, fungus, viruses, genetics, etc., the major change in the world

that could have lead to the explosion of cancer over the last 100 yearshas been the introduction of tens of thousands of chemicals into the

environment. Chemicals that we had never been exposed to before.Ones that our bodies don't know how to handle.

They overwhelm the defenses of your body and cancer develops.Unfortunately, if industry and the government they control have their

way, it may even become worse.

Biotech companies have been aggressively promoting the use ofgenetically modified food. It's a financial goldmine for them.

Unfortunately, there are several problems with genetically modified

food. Even the scientists at the FDA resisted them till political pressurefrom the top approved it. Every independent study has shown

problems with the eating of genetically modified food. Abnormal cellgrowth being high on the list. And no wonder.

Jeffrey Smith, author of Seeds of Deception writes onSeedsOfDeception.com:

"More worrisome is that the "promoter" used inside GM foodscould get transferred to bacteria or internal organs. Promoters act like

a light switches, permanently turning on genes that might otherwise

be switched off. Scientists believe that this might create unpredictablehealth effects, including the potentially pre-cancerous cell growth

found in the animal feeding studies mentioned above.

"Milk from rbGH-treated cows contains an increased amount of thehormone IGF-1, which is one of the highest risk factors associated withbreast and prostate cancer, among others. Soy allergies skyrocketed

by 50% in the UK, coinciding with the introduction of GM soy importsfrom the U.S."

Foods are not required to be labeled as GM foods.The only way to

make sure you are not eating food that has been genetically modified


17/45

is to eat organic food or food labeled non-gmo. Eating organic food willalso reduce the amount of chemicals you are ingesting.

Types of toxins in your body

There are several types of toxic buildups in the body that need to bedealt with when fighting cancer. First there is cellular toxicity caused

by the shunting of toxins into cells due to excess acidity in the blood,and the inability to release toxins in the cells for that very same

reason.

Next is heavy metal and chemical toxicity coming from years of

exposure to highly toxic heavy metals and chemicals. While manycome from the environment, silver amalgam fillings, many vaccines

and some other drugs put mercury and other toxins into our body.

Most large fish have elevated mercury levels. Elevated levels of heavymetals disrupt the immune system, and must be dealt with when

fighting cancer.

And then there is the toxic buildup in the colon of undigested foodsand hardened fecal matter. Nutrient absorption is disrupted, and toxins

sitting in that decaying mess are reabsorbed back into the body. This

creates a constant stress on the immune system, and a further load onthe body's detoxification systems. Colon cleaning needs to happen on

the journey to good health.

The Chlorinated Water and Cancer Connection

Pathogens in water have led to many diseases. But did you know that

what's put in your water to purify it may be causing your cancer (andheart disease)?

The French, with their lower cancer rates from consuming OPCs andresveratrol in red wine, have made red wine famous for its health

benefits. There is another side to their lower cancer rates that mostpeople don't know...

The French do not drink chlorinated water. They ozonate their waterto purify it.

Does this make a difference? Absolutely.

"We are quite convinced... that there is an association betweencancer and chlorinated water."

Medical College Of Wisconsin research team


18/45

We don't use chlorine because it's safe, we use it because it is cheap.

We essentially still pour bleach in our water before we drink it. Thelong-term effects of chlorinated drinking water are disastrous.

According to the U.S. Council Of Environmental Quality, "Cancerrisk among people drinking chlorinated water is 93% higher

than among those whose water does not contain chlorine."

It may cause much heart disease too. Dr. Joseph Price wrote a highly

controversial book in the late sixties titledCoronaries/Cholesterol/Chlorine, and concluded that nothing can

negate the incontrovertible fact, that the basic cause ofarteriosclerosis, heart attacks and stroke, is chlorine.

Dr. Price later headed up a study using chickens as test subjects,where two groups of several hundred birds were observed throughout

their span to maturity.One group was given water with chlorine and the other without. The

group raised with chlorine, when autopsied, showed some level ofheart or circulatory disease in every specimen, the group withouthad

noincidence of disease. The group without chlorine grew faster,

larger and displayed vigorous health.

This study was well received in the poultry industry, and is still used asa reference today. As a result, most large poultry producers use

dechlorinated water.

When chlorine is added to our water, it combines with other natural

compounds to form Trihalomethanes (chlorination byproducts), orTHMs. These chlorine byproducts trigger the production offree

radicals in the body, causing cell damage, and are highly

carcinogenic.

"Although concentrations of these carcinogens (THMs) are low, it isprecisely these low levels that cancer scientists believe are responsible

for the majorityof human cancers in the United States". TheEnvironmental Defense Fund

Dr. Robert Carlson, a highly respected University of Minnesotaresearcher, sums it up by claiming, "Chlorine is the greatest

crippler and killer of modern times!"

Breast cancer, which now affects one in every eight women in North


19/45

America, has recently been linked to the accumulation ofchlorinecompounds in the breast tissue. A study carried out in Hartford

Connecticut, the first of it's kind in North America, found that:

"Women with breast cancer have 50% to 60% higher levels of

organochlorines (chlorination byproducts) in their breast tissue thanwomen without breast cancer."

It is not just drinking chlorinated water that is the problem.

Up to two thirds of our exposure to chlorine is due to inhalation ofsteam and skin absorption while showering. A warm shower

opens up the pores of the skin and allows for accelerated absorption ofchlorine and other chemicals in water.

The steam we inhale while showering can contain up to 50 times thelevel of chemicals than tap water due to the fact that chlorine and

most other contaminants vaporize much faster and at a lowertemperature than water. Inhalation is a much more harmful means of

exposure since the chlorine gas (chloroform) we inhale goes directlyinto our blood stream.

"Showering is suspected as the primary cause of elevated levels ofchloroform in nearly every home because of chlorine in the water."

Dr Lance Wallace, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

If you take showers using chlorinated water and are dealing withcancer, clearly installing a shower filter to dechlorinate your shower

water makes good sense.

Other Toxin Sources

In the process of eliminating as much toxic exposure as possible, youneed to limit exposure from the chemicals in your carpets and walls of

your home. Unless you've already taken special efforts to have achemical free house, formaldehyde and many other chemicals have

been outgassing toxic fumes in yours for years. Hulda Clark, in herbooks on fighting cancer and other diseases, recommends that allcarpeting be pulled up, paneling and walls taken out and replaced, and

so on - if you want to beat cancer. Pretty drastic stuff. A lessoverwhelming solution would be to get a photo catalysis air cleaner.

Using technology developed by NASA, it puts out molecules thatinteract with VOC's, the chemicals put out by carpets, etc. and

changes them into harmless carbon and water molecules.


20/45

Personal care items like shampoo, conditioner, or skin lotion often

contain ingredients that addto the overburden of chemicals yourimmune system must get rid of. Try to use as natural and pure

personal care items with as few chemical listed in the ingredients as

possible to reduce that overload. The less overwhelmed your immunesystem is, the better it can fight the cancer.

The buildup of toxins in your body reduces cell oxygenation and toxins

will damage DNA, causing cell mutation. The key is to protect your

cells by making sure you are taking plenty of antioxidants, stopdrinking chlorinated water or taking showers in it, and get rid of the

buildup of toxins in your body using safe and natural detoxifiers.

There are three types of detoxification to be done, cellular

detoxification, intestinal detoxification and a more general bodydetoxification in which we will include heavy metal detoxification.

There is some crossover here, any detoxifier will work in more thanone way. And remember, it is very important to alkalinize the body as

that must happen before a great deal of detoxification can be done.

You will learn in the e-book which cancer killers also detoxify heavy

metals so you can do both with just one product. And whatsupplements you may need to take to support your detoxification

organs when you start killing off the cancer. Cancer cells alone arehighly toxic and will overload your detoxification organs, especially if

youve had or are having chemotherapy too.

Cancer Strategy #8: Free Radicals Promote Cancer By

Damaging DNA...Free Radical Scavengers Protect Cells From Damage

One of the causes of cancer is excessive free radical damage in yourcells that harms your DNA and results in some cells mutating into

cancerous cells. Every chemical and toxin in you body causes freeradical damage. The carcinogenic ones cause even more. Combined

with high acidity and low oxygenation, you've got a prescription forcancer.

Another reason we have too much free radical damage and too muchcancer is that processed foods generate more free radicals than whole

foods, and have fewer nutrients to act as free radical scavengers tohelp protect you from those free radicals. On top of this, you are

exposed to 70,000 chemicals -- 20,000 of which are known


21/45

cancer-causing agents. These all cause free radical damage.

For this strategy, the e-book focuses on a unique free radicalscavenger that has the ability to kill cancer cells by increasing the

amount of energy the mitochondria on the cancer cell is producing.

The cancer cells energy pathways are shut down because normallythey produce very little energy. The extra energy this one of a kind

supplement causes the cancer cells mitochondria to produce cannot behandled by the cancer cell. And causes it to die. It is one of the

strongest cancer killers we have seen.

Cancer Strategy #9: Low Levels Of Enzymes Always Found In

Cancer...Use The Right Enzymes To Kill Cancer Cells

Researchers have noted for years a correspondence between lowenzyme levels and cancer. In fact enzyme therapy has been used with

good results against cancers in Europe, and by some doctors in theUnited States. To literally digest cancerous cells.

In the early 1900's a doctor in Wales, John Beard discovered that

pancreatic enzymes destroyed cancer cells. Making some brilliant

observations, he deduced that cancer cells come from stem cells thatbecome uncontrolled stem cells. He noticed that the fetal pancreas

starts working and secreting enzymes at the 56th day of gestation.Fetus' don't digest anything till they are born. Beard wondered why did

the pancreas in the fetus start working so early? He noticed that theday the pancreas started producing enzymes was the day the placenta

stopped growing. The enzymes stopped this rapid growth.

His theory was that many placental cells remain in our body. When

these misplaced placental cells get lost and can start growing, turning

cancerous, if you don't have enough pancreatic enzymes. (By the waythe medical community thought he was crazy. Now a hundred years

later, technology has confirmed there are these cells.)

In 1911 he tested pancreatic enzymes for stopping cancer in mice andit worked. Naturally and unfortunately, he was blackballed and died inobscurity. Decades later Dr. Kelly read about his work, and cured

himself of cancer using pancreatic enzymes and started treating andcuring many cancer patients using pancreatic enzymes. Dr. Gonzales,

sent to investigate Dr. Kelly, liked what he saw so much that he alsotreats cancer using pancreatic enzymes.


22/45

The major reason enzymes levels become depleted is that we eatmostly processed, irradiated and cooked food.

The digestive system was designed to process raw food. Raw food,

when it is picked ripe, has enzymes in it that help break down that

food in the upper stomach where it sits for 30 to 45 minutes. Theenzymes in the food predigest that food. Then in the lower stomach

the pancreas excretes more enzymes.

When you eat cooked, irradiated and processed foods, the enzymes

have been killed; the food does not predigest in the upper stomach. Sowhen it reaches the lower stomach two things happen. The pancreas

must make extra enzymes to try and break down the food.

And often the food is only partially digested.

The pancreas, after decades of overworking, eventually is no longer

able to produce an adequate supply of enzymes. So you develop lowenzyme levels of all types of enzymes, and your body cannot

naturally kill cancerous cells using enzymes.

In addition, food that is not completely digested all too often makes its

way into the bloodstream. Especially if you have leaky gut syndromefrom candida overgrowth. This partially digest food is treated as a

toxin, and the immune system has to get rid of it. This puts anadditional strain on the already overworked immune system.

Studies have found that the immune system treats the ingestion ofcooked food as a toxic poison, causing a jump in white blood cells in

an attempt to get rid of it as fast as possible.

Taking a good quality enzyme supplement with meals, one that has

high levels of protease to digest protein, lipase to digest fat, andamylase to digest carbohydrates helps break down food in the upper

stomach. So that the pancreas doesn't have to produce extraenzymes. Food is better digested. You also need to take Betaine HCL

and the HCL Activator to help break down protein.

Also, it is important to take enzymes on an empty stomach. A stack of

research shows that enzymes, when taken in this manner, will go intothe bloodstream and clean it up. And in the process may digest and kill

cancer cells.

This will also unstick clumpy red blood cells. Sticky, clumped up red


23/45

blood cell clusters clog up capillaries and reduce circulation. So thatcells cannot oxygenate properly. Which as you have gathered by now,

contributes to cancer.

Cancer tumors produce a thick fibrin protein to help protect them from

the immune system. This also helps to stick the cancer tumor towherever it is.

Enzymes in the bloodstream can digest and dissolve the fibrin coating.

Large amounts of enzymes would need to be taken, and they would

need to be enzymes high in protease, Nattokinase or other fibrindigesting enzymes like Serratiopeptidase to break down the fibrin.

In the 11 Natural Therapies e-book you will learn about a supplement

more powerful than these enyzmes are at killing cancer cells and

digesting fibrin. It will even help you kill candida if you have candidaovergrowth.

Cancer Strategy #10: Energetically Fight Cancer

With some of the most powerful cancer fighting supplementswe have ever researched...

Conditions that lead to cancer can also be viewed energetically. Infact, low energetic vibrations may well set the stage for the

development of cancer. Cancer cells have much lower levels ofvibratory subtle energy. For a cell to turn cancerous, its vibratory

energy must be low. Raising the energetic level of the body alone hashelped some people conquer cancer.

You can raise the vibratory levels of your cells. One way is to drinkfluids that have been energized. Liquids vibrate at the rate fluids near

them are vibrating. Drinking high-energy water will raise the energetic

level of cellular fluids. The higher they are raised, the harder you makeit on cancer.

Electromagnetic Fields (EMFs) are another possible cause of cancer.

You are exposed to them by electronic appliances. Cell phones,computer screens and microwaves are among the biggest offenders,but even the clock radio by the side of your bed is putting out

unhealthy levels of EMFs for a foot or two. Your car puts out quite a bitof it.

Radiation from cell phones can literally eat holes in your blood brain

barrier, which functions to prevent toxins from entering the brain.


24/45

When it is full of holes, toxins get into brain, causing much damage. ASwedish study has found that heavy users of cell phones had a

240 percentincrease in brain tumors on the side of their headthat the phone was used on. The study defined 'heavy' use as more

than 2,000 total hours, or approximately one hour of use per workday

for 10 years.

There are two ways you can deal with EMFs. You can try to avoidexposure to them, or you can wear or use an energized product that

counters the effect of that radiation to your body's energy field. For

example, you can choose to not use a cell phone or any portablephone, or you can put a good cell phone energy neutralizer on the

phone to neutralize the radiation.

Geopathic stress has been implicated by many alternative health

practitioners in Europe as a cause of cancer. Simply put, geopathicstress is unhealthy energy coming from the earth. One cause is

underground streams that creates friction that produces the wrongtype of energy.

Two developers of energized products both had cancer that would not

resolve until they were told to check and see if they slept over

geopathic stress. They did, changed their sleeping arrangements, andthen were able to get well. A study in England noted that gypsies,

even though their diets and smoking habits were poor, were not nearas likely to get cancer because they were always moving so were not

likely to have been sleeping in an area of geopathic stress for years ata time.

The 11 Natural Therapies To Conquer Cancer e-book covers thedevelopment and release of some incredibly powerful energetic

elixirs in May and June of 2008. You will learn how these energy

Elixirs that are proving to be the most powerful healing supplements(and top cancer fighters) that we have found. These are especially

important for end stage cancers where you need as much life forceas possible to stave off dying.

Cancer Strategy #11: Psychological Stress Leads To Cancer...Resolving Stressful Issues Vital For Success Against Cancer

Dr. Hamer, a German oncologist, developed cancer in the late 70s,

shortly after his son's untimely death. Theorizing there was aconnection between the stress of his son's death and his development

of cancer, he began to investigate his cancer patients' histories, and


25/45

found that they too had experienced an unexpected shock or traumashortly before their cancer.

Next, he analyzed his patients brain scans and compared them with

the corresponding medical and psychological records. Amazingly, he

found a clear correlation between shocks, specific areas of the braindamaged by certain types of shocks, and particular organs where

cancer developed depending on the type of trauma.

Based on over 40,000 case studies, over a number of years hedeveloped a theory that every disease originates from a shock or

trauma that catches us by surprise. The moment the unexpectedconflict occurs, the shock strikes a specific area in the brain causing a

lesion (called Hamer Focus), visible on a brain scan as a set of sharpconcentric rings in MRI's. The brain cells that receive the impact send

a biochemical signal to the corresponding body cells causing the

growth of a tumor, a meltdown of tissue or functional loss, dependingon which brain layer receives the shock.

He theorized that specific conflicts are tied to specific areas in the

brain because, during evolution, brain areas are programmed to

respond instantly to conflicts that could threaten survival. Forexample, let's say that a woman is walking with her child. Suddenly

the child runs into the street, and is struck by a car. The moment amother sees her child injured she suffers a mother-child-worry-

conflict, and in a split second the special biological program for this

particular type of conflict is switched on.

This always impacts in the brain area that controls the function of thebreast glands. This is because, in biological terms, an injured offspring

recovers faster when it receives more milk, extra milk production is

immediately stimulated by increasing the number of breast gland cells.Even if the woman is not breast feeding, this event is still triggered. As

long as the child is in the hospital, the breast cells will keep dividingand multiplying, forming what is commonly called a glandular breast

tumor. When the child recovers, the mother will start to heal.

So you correct the problem that is causing the stress, like getting anew job if you have been fired, or a new spouse if there has been a

divorce. Or you psychologically learn to deal with the issue so that itno longer is causing stress. Either is vital for healing from cancer.

Done in conjunction with conventional treatments, the results havebeen exceptional.

Dr. Hamer suffered over the years for his controversial theories. One


26/45

prosecutor pulled his records, and went through patient after patient.Out of 6500 patients with terminal cancer, 6000 were alive. Pretty

impressive.

Cancer has many more causes than only being initiated by stressful

events. But it does look like they are much more important in initiatingcancer than anyone had previously thought. What is undoubtedly true

is that stress knocks down the immune system significantly, whichcould certainly translate into accelerated growth of cancer cells.

Continued stress from unresolved traumatic events must inhibit your

body's ability to fight cancer.

Fortunately, there are now ways of dealing with, and releasing, eventsand problems that cause stress which work much faster and more

effectively than traditional psychotherapy. One of the best is called the

Sedona Method.

What The Medical Industry Won't Tell YouAbout Treating Cancer

There was a woman whose daughter was in the advanced stages of

brain cancer. She asked her oncologist if it was okay to give her

daughter a superfood called blue green algae. Her doctor told her thatit was no problem, that in fact a number of his patients had used that

supplement with success in fighting cancer.

Naturally she wondered why he didn't tell her about this product ayear before when they came to him.

Unfortunately, he couldn't tell her about this or any "natural oralternative health therapies" and stay employed. Insurance

regulations would preclude such suggestions. And he could get

into administrative trouble by recommending natural, non-drugtreatments for cancer.

His advice is controlled by a large medical industry that makes mega

money off expensive cancer fighting drugs and treatments. Anindustry that doesn't look favorably on natural supplements or othercancer treatments as they cannot patent them to make high profits.

Fifty years from now, the current conventional cancer treatments used

by doctors will on the whole be viewed in the same light that we viewthe old medical practice of using leeches to cure illnesses.
http://www.sedona.com/AffiliateWiz/aw.aspx?B=37&A=81&Task=Clickhttp://www.sedona.com/AffiliateWiz/aw.aspx?B=37&A=81&Task=Click


27/45

Chemotherapy and other treatments damage cells and tear down andweaken the immune system. But the problem in the first place is that

your immune system is already weak, and that your cells are alreadydamaged.

Even if tumors do go into remission, these treatments will havedamaged other cells, which are more likely to turn cancerous. The

immune system, unless it is supported by supplements and diet tohelp it recover, will be in worse shape then ever.

While it may have taken decades for cancer to develop the first timearound, the second time usually takes a year or two.

Another reason why doctors ignore sensible, safe and healthy

treatments for cancer, and recommend costly and illogical treatments

instead -- is human nature. They advise and prescribe what theyknow. Just what we all do.

You go to them and you get what they know. You assume they will do

the best they can for you, while in fact they only do what the systemteaches them, promotes and allows them to do.

A Doctor's Shocking Closed-Door Confession ...

In a survey of 79 oncologists from McGill University Cancer Center inCanada, 64 said they would not consent to treatment with Cisplatin, a

common chemotherapy drug, while 58 oncologists said they wouldreject all the current trials being carried out by their establishment.Why? "The ineffectiveness of chemotherapy and its unacceptable

degree of toxicity." Philip Day, Cancer: Why We're Still Dying to Knowthe Truth

This information is shocking to say the least. But consider this ...

Doctors today are not very different than they were 150 or 200 yearsago. Back then the common practice was for interns and doctors

working on cadavers to walk down the hall to deliver a baby withoutwashing their hands. Many women died from the subsequentinfections.

Finally a doctor in charge of a clinic figured out what was happening,

and had them wash their hands. The infections stopped. When hepublished his results, the medical profession was outraged. Good

doctors could not be the cause of something like this. The doctor was


28/45

ostracized and fired.

He went elsewhere and repeated the experiment. Again, deathsdropped. Again he announced the results, and again the medical

profession rose up against him. The end of the story was, he lost

everything, went insane from the tragedy of it all, and eventually killedhimself.

Bottom line: Don't expect a doctor working inside the system to buck

the system. The risks are too great.

According to the National Cancer Institute, about 500,000 people will

be diagnosed with some form of cancer this year. You may not knowit, but cancer -- NOT heart disease -- is the number one risk of death

for most everyone.

Chemotherapy works by killing all cells -- throughout your body -- that

multiply and divide rapidly. This would include cancer cells, and otherrapidly multiplying and dividing cells, that we need, such as:

Bone marrow, which produces blood

Digestive system

Reproductive systemHair follicles

This overkill approach is one of the causes of an astounding overall

failure rate of chemotherapy, as you'll see below.

In 2004, the Journal of Clinical Oncology published a study about

chemotherapys success rates when looking at how many cancerpatients were still alive after 5 years. It states:

RESULTS: The overall contribution of curative and adjuvant cytotoxicchemotherapy to 5-year survival in adults was estimated to be 2.3% in

Australia and 2.1% in the USA.

CONCLUSION: As the 5-year relative survival rate for cancer inAustralia is now over 60%, it is clear that cytotoxic chemotherapy onlymakes a minor contribution to cancer survival. To justify the continued

funding and availability of drugs used in cytotoxic chemotherapy, arigorous evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and impact on quality of

life is urgently required.

Youd be hard pressed to find anything still being touted as your best


29/45

shot at a cure with an average success rate of just over 2 percent,which chemotherapy has, if it wasnt for the fact that big profits were

driving the recommendation. For stage 4 cancers the rate is less thanhalf of one percent.

Fundamentally, chemotherapy rarely works. Worse, some drugtreatments also promote the spread of cancer. But somehow the

rationale to avoid these agents because they might promote cancerdoes not apply when it comes to drugs.

A Cancer Journal for the Clinician article concludes by stating:

Pending the publication of suitable trials, clinicians must be guided byexisting data in the context of a fundamental principle of medicine,

"Primum non nocere." (First do no harm.)

And yet, conventional cancer treatments can in no way, shape or form

ever be considered harmless.

"...as a chemist trained to interpret data, it is incomprehensible to methat physicians can ignore the clear evidence that chemotherapy does

much, much more harm than good."

Alan C Nixon, PhD, former president of the American Chemical Society


30/45

In order to understand the scientific proof for the avoidance of cancer, wewill attempt to explain briefly how scientists map the workings of the

body.

The fluids outside the cells within the body ideally have a pH of 7.4 - 7.5(i.e. they are alkaline). this fluid enters the cell, is depleted and exits thecell now having a pH of 6.8. The action of fluids going in and out of thecells at these levels and creates an electrical charge of 70 mili-volts. Ifthe body cannot create this electrical charge it dies. It is essential to lifefor nutrients to be converted into electricity. Absent this charge, and thebrain cannot communicate.

This charge is reliant on a trigger mechanism composed of a couple of

nutrients. If these nutrients are lacking the body must use its ownstored-up supply. Alkalinity level goes down, oxygen supply decreasesand the body becomes susceptible to many illnesses including allcancers.

Over 75 years ago, Otto Warburg was awarded two Nobel prizes for histheories that cancer is caused by weakened cell respiration due to lack ofoxygen at the cellular level. According to Warburg, damaged cellrespiration causes fermentation, resulting in low pH (acidity) at thecellular level.

Dr. Warburg, in his Nobel Prize winning paper, illustrated the environmentof the cancer cell. A normal healthy cell undergoes an adverse changewhen it can no longer take in oxygen to convert glucose into energy. Inthe absence of oxygen, the cell reverts to a primal nutritional program tonourish itself by converting glucose through the process of fermentation.The lactic acid produced by fermentation lowers the cell pH (acid/alkalinebalance) and destroys the ability of DNA and RNA to control cell division.The cancer cells then begin to multiply. The lactic acid simultaneouslycauses severe local pain as it destroys cell enzymes. the cancer appearsas a rapidly growing external cell covering with a core of dead cells.

Otto Warburg won a Nobel Prize for showing that cancer thrives inanaerobic (without oxygen), or acidic, conditions. research by KeithBrewer, PhD and H.E. Satori has shown that raising the pH, or oxygencontent, range of a cell to pH 8.0 creates a deadly environment forcancer. The pH scale ranges from 0 to 14, with numbers below 7representing an acidic condition and above 7 representing an alkaline, oroxygenated, condition. When Master Formula II is taken up by cancercells, it raises the pH, or oxygen content, of the cell. The cells that die


31/45

are absorbed and eliminated by the body.

There is a solution and it's a Nobel Prize Winning proven formula - MasterFormula II. Master Formula II is designed to raise the pH level, increase

the oxygen supply in the body, kill existing cancer cells and prevent newcancer cells from forming.

In order to be beneficial to a healthy, pain free body, elements must bebio-available, i.e. the body must be able to use them, or they are not onlypractically useless, but they are deleterious in that they create a falsesense of security. Despite the publicity attached to calcium, 80% of thepopulation is deficient because only about 5% is usable in the mosthighly touted products. These deficiencies contribute to over 150diseases.

Scientists instruct that for calcium to be bio-available, the formulationmust have the correct ratios of Calcium, and its elemental partnerMagnesium; that is must have its trigger Vitamin D, which requiresvitamin A, and then must be ionized. They must be in a liquid form wheningested. pills are essentially a waste of money unless you make yourliving selling pills.

Advanced Scientific Health could not find an existing formulation havingthe integrity necessary. At enormous expense using our own bio-chemists we invested substantial resources to develop the properformulation for Master Formula II.

Each teaspoon of Master Formula II contains 600mg Calcium, 345mgMagnesium, 10000iu Vitamin A and 200iu Vitamin D. These are thescientific ratios. The recommended daily doses are as follows: pH 6.5 -7.4 (healthy range) 1 teaspoon; pH 6.0 - 6.5 (developing a disease) 2teaspoons; pH 4.5-6.0 (you have a disease) 3 teaspoons. Remember tomix the powder in a liquid (water, orange juice, green tea - not acarbonated beverage), so it can react with the molecules to ionize. Giveit time to dissolve, and combine with the hydrogen in the liquid beforedrinking.

Cesium is one of the most alkaline elements. Otto Warburg won a Nobel Prize forshowing that cancer thrives in anaerobic (without oxygen), or acidic, conditions.research by Keith Brewer, PhD and H.E. Satori has shown that raising the pH, oroxygen content, range of a cell to pH 8.0 creates a deadly environment forcancer. The pH scale ranges from 0 to 14, with numbers below 7 representing an


32/45

acidic condition and above 7 representing an alkaline, or oxygenated, condition.When cesium is taken up by cancer cells, it raises the pH, or oxygen content, ofthe cell. The cells that die are absorbed and eliminated by the body.

Cesium has been used to raise the pH of the body as an

alternative cancer treatment of therapy for breast cancer, lungcancer, prostate cancer, colon cancer, pancreatic cancer, livercancer, skin cancer, ovarian cancer, stomach cancer, cervicalcancer, brain cancer, kidney cancer, testicular cancer, bonecancer, throat cancer, thyroid cancer, gastrointestinal cancer,cancers of the bladder and gallbladder, metastatic melanoma,and cancers in animals including feline, canine, and equinecancer.

Over 75 years ago, Otto Warburg was awarded two Nobel prizesfor his theories that cancer is caused by weakened cellrespiration due to lack of oxygen at the cellular level. Accordingto Warburg, damaged cell respiration causes fermentation,resulting in low pH (acidity) at the cellular level.

Dr. Warburg, in his Nobel Prize winning paper, illustrated theenvironment of the cancer cell. A normal healthy cell undergoesan adverse change when it can no longer take in oxygen toconvert glucose into energy. In the absence of oxygen, the cell

reverts to a primal nutritional program to nourish itself byconverting glucose through the process of fermentation. Thelactic acid produced by fermentation lowers the cell pH(acid/alkaline balance) and destroys the ability of DNA and RNAto control cell division. The cancer cells then begin to multiply.

The lactic acid simultaneously causes severe local pain as itdestroys cell enzymes. the cancer appears as a rapidly growingexternal cell covering with a core of dead cells.

There are a number of areas on the world where the incidence of

cancer is very low. At the 1978 Stockholm Conference on Foodand Cancer, it was concluded that there is a definite connectionbetween food composition and cancer rates. Significant is thereport on the presence of high levels of Cesium (Cs) andRubidium (Rb) in food consumed in these areas, along withavailability of various supportive compounds such as Vitamin A,Vitamin C, Zinc and Selenium. Examples are the Hopi Indian


33/45

territory (Arizona), the Hunza area (North Pakistan), and thevolcanic regions of Brazil. Incidence of cancer is 1 in 1000 inthese populations vs. 1 in 3 in the USA. The diets of thesepopulations is similar to the nutritional requirements for the high

pH cancer therapy developed by Dr. Brewer.

Cancer Research - A Super

Fraud?By Robert Ryan, B.Sc.

http://www.pnc.com.au/~cafmr/online/research/cancer.html3-31-1

"Everyone should know that most cancer research is largely afraud and that the major cancer research organisations arederelict in their duties to the people who support them." -Linus Pauling PhD (Two-time Nobel Prize winner).

Have you ever wondered why, despite the billions of dollarsspent on cancer research over many decades, and the constant

promise of a cure which is forever "just around the corner",cancer continues to increase?

Cancer Is Increasing


34/45

Once quite rare, cancer is now the second major cause ofdeath in Western countries such as Australia, the U.S.A. andthe United Kingdom. In the early 1940s cancer accounted for12% of Australian deaths. (1) By 1992 this figure had

climbed to 25.9% of Australian deaths. (2) The increasingtrend of cancer deaths and incidence is typical of mostWestern nations. It has been said that this increase in canceris just due to the fact that people now live longer than theirancestors did, and that therefore the increase of cancer ismerely due to the fact that more people are living to be olderand thereby have a greater chance of contracting cancer.However, this argument is disproved by the fact that canceris also increasing in younger age groups, as well as by thefindings of numerous population studies which have linkedvarious life-style factors of particular cultures to the

particular forms of cancer that are predominant there.

The Orthodox "War on Cancer" Has Failed

"My overall assessment is that the national cancerprogramme must be judged a qualified failure" Dr. JohnBailer, who spent 20 years on the staff of the U.S. NationalCancer Institute and was editor of its journal. (3) Dr. Bailer

also says: "The five year survival statistics of the AmericanCancer Society are very misleading. They now count thingsthat are not cancer, and, because we are able to diagnose atan earlier stage of the disease, patients falsely appear to livelonger. Our whole cancer research in the past 20 years has

been a total failure. More people over 30 are dying fromcancer than ever before . . . More women with mild or benigndiseases are being included in statistics and reported as being'cured'. When government officials point to survival figuresand say they are winning the war against cancer they areusing those survival rates improperly."

A 1986 report in the New England Journal of Medicineassessed progress against cancer in the United States duringthe years 1950 to 1982. Despite progress against some rareforms of cancer, which account for 1 to 2 per cent of totaldeaths caused by the disease, the report found that the overall


35/45


36/45

Desired: A State of No Cure?

In fact, some analysts consider that the cancer industry issustained by a policy of deliberately facing in the wrongdirection. For instance, in the late 1970s, after studying the

policies, activities, and assets of the major U.S. cancerinstitutions, the investigative reporters Robert Houston andGary Null concluded that these institutions had become self-

perpetuating organisations whose survival depended on thestate of no cure. They wrote, "a solution to cancer wouldmean the termination of research programs, the obsolescenceof skills, the end of dreams of personal glory, triumph overcancer would dry up contributions to self-perpetuatingcharities and cut off funding from Congress, it wouldmortally threaten the present clinical establishments byrendering obsolete the expensive surgical, radiological andchemotherapeutic treatments in which so much money,training and equipment is invested.

Such fear, however unconscious, may result in resistance andhostility to alternative approaches in proportion as they aretherapeutically promising. The new therapy must bedisbelieved, denied, discouraged and disallowed at all costs,regardless of actual testing results, and preferably withoutany testing at all. As we shall see, this pattern has in actualityoccurred repeatedly, and almost consistently." (8) Indeed,many people around the world consider that they have beencured by therapies which were 'blacklisted' by the majorcancer organisations.

Does this mean that ALL of the people who work in thecancer research industry are consciously part of a conspiracyto hold back a cure for cancer? Author G.Edward Griffinexplains ". . . let's face it, these people die from cancer likeeverybody else. . . [I]t's obvious that these people are notconsciously holding back a control for cancer. It does mean,however, that the [pharmaceutical-chemical] cartel's medicalmonopoly has created a climate of bias in our educationalsystem, in which scientific truth often is sacrificed to vestedinterests . . . [I]f the money is coming from drug companies,or indirectly from drug companies, the impetus is in thedirection of drug research. That doesn't mean somebody blew


37/45

the whistle and said "hey, don't research nutrition!" It justmeans that nobody is financing nutrition research. So it is a

bias where scientific truth often is obscured by vestedinterest." (9) This point is similarly expressed by Dr. SydneySinger: "Researchers are like prostitutes. They work for grantmoney. If there is no money for the projects they are

personally interested in, they go where there is money. Theirincomes come directly from their grants, not from theuniversities. And they want to please the granting source toget more grants in the future. Their careers depend on it."(10)

Money Spent on Fraudulent Research?

A large portion of money donated to cancer research by the

public is spent on animal research which has, since itsinception, been widely condemned as a waste of time andresources. For instance, consider the 1981 CongressionalTestimony by Dr. Irwin Bross, former director of the Sloan-Kettering, the largest cancer research institute in the world,and then Director of Biostatistics at Roswell Park MemorialInstitute for Cancer Research, Bufallo, NY: "The uselessnessof most of the animal model studies is less well known. Forexample, the discovery of chemotherapeutic agents for thetreatment of human cancer is widely-heralded as a triumphdue to use of animal model systems. However, here again,these exaggerated claims are coming from or are endorsed bythe same people who get the federal dollars for animalresearch. There is little, if any, factual evidence that wouldsupport these claims. Indeed, while conflicting animal resultshave often delayed and hampered advances in the war oncancer, they have never produced a single substantialadvance either in the prevention or treatment of humancancer. For instance, practically all of the chemotherapeutic

agents which are of value in the treatment of human cancerwere found in a clinical context rather than in animalstudies." (11)

In fact, many substances which cause cancer in humans aremarketed as "safe" on the basis of animal tests. As expressed

by Dr. Werner Hartinger of Germany, in regard to cancer-causing products of the pharmaceutical-petro-chemical


38/45

industry, "Their constant consumption is legalised on thebasis of misleading animal experiments . . . which seduce theconsumer into a false sense of security." (12)

Imagine What Could Be Achieved

The next time you are asked to donate to a cancerorganisation, bear in mind that your money will be used tosustain an industry which has been deemed by many eminentscientists as a qualified failure and by others, as a completefraud. If you would like to make a difference, inform theseorganisations that you won't donate to them until they changetheir approach to one which is focussed on prevention andstudy of the human condition. We have the power to changethings by making their present approach unprofitable. It is

only through our charitable donations and taxes that theseinstitutions survive on their present unproductive path.

Copyright 1997 by the Campaign Against FraudulentMedical Research, P.O. Box 234, Lawson NSW 2783,Australia. Phone +61 (0)2-4758-6822.www.pnc.com.au/~cafmr

The above article may be downloaded, copied, printed or

otherwise distributed without seeking permission fromCAFMR. However, printed acknowledgement is requiredwhen this is done.

References

d'Espaignet, E.T. et al., Trends in Australian Mortality 1921-1988, Australian Government Publishing Service (AGPS),Canberra, 1991, p. 33

Australian Bureau of Statistics, Causes of Death, Australia1992, ABS, Canberra, 1993, p.1

Dr. Bailer, speaking at the Annual Meeting of the AmericanAssociation for the Advancement of Science in May 1985, asquoted in Bette Overall, Animal Research Takes Lives -


39/45

Humans and Animals BOTH Suffer, NZAVS, 1993, p.132

Robert Sharpe, The Cruel Deception, Thorsons PublishingGroup, Wellingborough, U.K. 1988, p.47

Robert Sharpe, op. cit. 1988, p.47

Hans Ruesch, Naked Empress - the Great Medical Fraud,CIVIS, Massagno/Lugano, Switzerland, 1992, p.77

Robert Sharpe, op. cit. 1988, p.65 as quoted in Hans Ruesch,op.cit. 1992, p.65-66

Edward Griffin, The Politics of Cancer, (audio cassette)American Media, 1975 available from CAFMR $14.

Sydney Singer, Medical Demystification (M.D.) Report,Vol.1 No.1 p.5., Medical Demystification Crusade, 1992,CA, U.S.A.

Irwin Bross, as quoted in Robert Sharpe, op.cit., 1988 p.179

Dr. Werner Hartinger, in a speech given at the 2ndInternational Scientific Congress of the Doctors in BritainAgainst Animal Experiments (D.B.A.E.), London, 24 Sept.

1992.

The medical establishment and drug companies need people and the public to believe that thingsare going well. Only this way, would they stay in power; only this way, would donation dollarscontinuing flowing toward them; and, only this way, will people continue be put through theirsavage cancer treatment methods, while lining their pockets with blood-stained drug profits.

This all sounds so extreme, so hard-line. But I am not the only one who believes this to be thetruth.

Read on for Tony Isaacs article on the war against cancer. Tony has, I believe, done his part oneducating people on safe and effective methods to deal with cancer.

Hiding the Truth About Losing the War on Cancer

by Tony Isaacs

(NaturalNews) For well over half a century we have been promised by mainstream medicine thata cure or major breakthrough for cancer was just around the corner. Every year we see promisingnew drugs and therapies announced. Yet every year we also see more people contract cancerand more people die of cancer.


40/45

Instead of focusing on natural and safe methods of prevention and treatment, we continue to treatby using surgery, chemotherapy and radiation to cut out, poison out and burn out the symptomsof cancer while leaving the underlying causes untreated and we continue to largely ignore therole that proper diet, nutrition and lifestyle plays in preventing and helping cure cancer.

Although surgery does have some success against a limited number of cancers, chemo and

radiation achieve at best a 3% increase in length of survival and true cures from cancer (meaningthat the patient becomes completely cancer free and the cancer never returns). The fact is thatfor those who are diagnosed with cancer, after the third year the survival rate for those who hadno treatment at all increases steadily and for those who had mainstream treatment it decreasessteadily.(1)

Despite the dismal record, those in the $300 Billion a year cancer industry appear determined tomaintain a stranglehold on treatment. One way they do so is to suppress natural alternatives.

Another is to misreport their success rates by altering statistics to make their success appear tobe much better than it actually is.

Here are six ways that mainstream medicine misreports their statistics:

1. By re-defining cure as alive five years after diagnosis: instead of using the words realmeaning, which is cancer-free. Thus a patient could still have cancer the entire five years anddie one day after the 5th anniversary date of diagnosis and still be recorded as a cure.

2. By simply omitting certain groups of people, such as African Americans, or by omitting certaintypes of cancer, such as all lung cancers patients, from their statistical calculations.

3. By including types of cancer that are not life-threatening and are easily curable, such as skincancers and DCIS.

The statistics most commonly reported include many such easily curable cancers, such aslocalized cancers of the cervix, non-spreading cancers and melanomas, as well as cancers thatmany feel are not true cancers at all, merely pre-cancers. For example, DCIS is a pre-cancerouscondition that is 99% curable and makes up 30% of all breast cancers. Deduct that 30% from thebreast cancer cure rates and survival statistics and the figures are much less impressive.

4. By allowing earlier detection to erroneously imply longer survival.

5. By deleting patients from cancer treatment studies who die too soon, even if that is on the 89thday of a 90 day chemotherapy protocol.

6. By using a questionable adjustment called relative survival rate where they get to deduct acertain number of cancer victims who statistics say would have died during the five years of othercauses such as heart attacks, car wrecks, etc.

Source: Tanya Harter Pierce Outsmart Your Cancer

These outrageous fudges, as Ms. Pierce too kindly calls them, have all been incorporated intocancer cure statistics to hide the fact that the war on cancer has been hopelessly lost andwrongly waged. In the opinion of many who are far more knowledgeable and qualified than I am,the so-called War on Cancer is little more than a hoax.


41/45

Everyone should know that most cancer research is largely a fraud and that the major cancerresearch organizations are derelict in their duties to the people who support them.

can heart disease and cancer be prevented

Documents