can public policy control rising drug prices?...can public policy control rising drug prices? the...
TRANSCRIPT
Can Public Policy Control Rising Drug Prices?
The Houston Economics ClubNovember 7, 2018
#BakerHealth
Vivian Ho, PhDJames A. Baker III Institute Chair in Health EconomicsDirector, Center for Health and BiosciencesProfessor, Department of Economics at Rice University Professor, Department of Medicine at Baylor College of Medicine
Outline
• What is the problem?
• Policy Options• Legislation
• Expert Recommendations
• Trump Administration
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
$4,000
196
0
197
0
198
0
199
0
200
0
200
1
200
2
200
3
200
4
200
5
200
6
200
7
200
8
200
9
201
0
201
1
201
2
201
3
201
4
201
5
201
6
201
7*
201
8*
Pe
rce
nt
Ch
ange
fro
m P
revi
ou
s Ye
ar
Bill
ion
s
Total ExpendituresPercent Growth
* projected
National Health Expenditures
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
Ave
rage
An
nu
al P
erc
ent
Ch
ange
fro
m
Pre
vio
us
Year
Hospital Care
Physician and Clinical Services
Prescription Drugs
Epipen $608
National Health Expenditures
* projected
Epipen $349
Daraprim $750Epipen $461
Epipen $264
Medicare Trustees Estimates for ‘17-’27: Average Annual Growth in Medicare Beneficiary Costs for
Part A, Part B, and Part D Between 2017 and 2027
Source: 2018 Annual Report of the Boards of Trustees of the Federal Hospital Insurance and Federal Supplemental Medical Insurance Trust Funds
Per beneficiary spending:
2017 $5,160 $5,915 $2,110
2027 $7,443 $10,004 $3,296
3.7
5.44.6
Part A Part B Part D
0.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Pe
rce
nt
Dis
trib
uti
on
Hospital Care Physician and Clinical Services Prescription Drugs
National Health Expenditures
Old drug price inflation - Valeant Pharmaceuticals
Average Annual Prescription Drug Price Change vs. Inflation 2006-2015
Source: Trends in Retail Prices of Prescription Drugs Widely Used by Older Americans: 2006-2015, AARP Public Policy Institute 2017.
Annual Percentage Change in Retail Prices by Drug Type, 2006-2015
Source: Trends in Retail Prices of Prescription Drugs Widely Used by Older Americans: 2006-2015, AARP Public Policy Institute 2017.
Commonly Prescribed Drugs for Seniors
The top 20 most commonly prescribed brand-name drugs for seniors in Medicare Part D in 2015 were:
Advair Diskus Nexium Restasis Ventolin HFA
Crestor Nitrostat Spiriva Handihaler Voltaren Gel
Januvia Novolog Symbicort Xarelto
Lantus/Lantus Solostar Premarin Synthroid Zetia
Lyrica Proair HFA Tamiflu Zostavax
Source: US Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee, Minority Office, March 2016
Popular Drug Price Change vs. Inflation
Source: US Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee, Minority Office, March 2016
Product 2012 Prescriptions 2017 Prescriptions Prescription Difference Percent Change
(U.S. Total) (U.S. Total) (2012-2017) (2012-2017)
Ventolin HFA 17,414,376 27,069,765 9,655,389 55%
Proair HFA 24,873,170 25,977,546 1,104,376 4%
Synthroid 23,073,988 18,411,640 -4,662,348 -20%
Lantus/Lantus Solostar 18,558,937 17,004,123 -1,554,814 -8%
Advair Diskus 17,018,219 10,700,788 -6,317,431 -37%
Lyrica 9,114,028 10,373,276 1,259,248 14%
Januvia 8,893,922 9,913,198 1,019,276 11%
Symbicort 5,246,325 9,888,532 4,642,207 88%
Xarelto 1,078,207 9,593,823 8,515,616 790%
Spiriva Handihaler 9,625,240 5,759,976 -3,865,264 -40%
Novolog 3,385,303 5,045,237 1,659,934 49%
Restasis 2,818,474 3,037,271 218,797 8%
Nexium 22,021,459 2,246,968 -19,774,491 -90%
Tamiflu 3,313,707 2,143,796 -1,172,911 -35%
Premarin 5,223,690 2,046,125 -3,177,565 -61%
Voltaren Gel 2,954,278 1,964,665 -989,613 -33%
Zetia 7,915,532 1,730,633 -6,184,899 -78%
Crestor 25,337,566 1,604,070 -23,733,496 -94%
Zostavax 2,291,538 1,344,617 -949,921 -41%
Nitrostat 4,273,413 309,442 -3,963,971 -93%
Total 214,434,372 166,165,491 -48,268,881 -33%
Total U.S. Prescriptions of Most Commonly Prescribed Brand-Name Drugs
Price
Prescription Drug Demand
Quantity
D
Q 2012Q 2017
P 2017
P 2012
Prices Matter
Historical prices for one week of treatment with Enbrel and Gleevec
15
Declining value
$-
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
Co
st
($)
Year
Prices of Gleevec vs. iPhone over time
Price of
iPhone/GHz with contract
AWP of 1 week treatment of 400mg Gleevec
Value (benefits in relation to costs) declining
Access Spending
Why we should care – patient access
https://drugpricinglab.org/tools/dpl-policy-tracker/
Policy Legislators
Allow Importation / Re‑importationMcCain (R-AZ), Franken (D-MN), Klobuchar (D-MN), Sanders (I-VT),
Ellison (D-MN)
Boost Generic Competition
Cruz (R-TX), Smith (D-WA), Stivers (R-OH), Brown (D-OH), Franken
(D-MN), Klobuchar (D-MN), Shrander (D-OR), Sanders (I-VT), Vitter
(R-LA), Leahy (D-VT), Collins (R-ME), McKinley (R-WV), Goodlatte (R-
VA)
Reduce Branded MonopoliesWyden (D-OR), Franken (D-MN), Sanders (I-VT), Lance (R-NJ),
Ryan (R-WI)
Ban/Restrict DTC Advertising DeLauro (D-CT), Franken (D-MN)
Require Price & Cost TransparencyFranken (D-MN), Wyden (D-OR), Sanders (I-VT), Baldwin (D-WI),
Durbin (D-IL), Perlmutter (D-CO), Collins (R-GA)
Use Value-based payment Ryan (R-WI), President Donald Trump
Apply Price Inflation Limiters Franken (D-MN), Wyden (D-OR), Brown (D-OH), DeLauro (D-CT)
Let Government be the Purchaser Sanders (I-VT), Baldwin (D-WI), Franken (D-MN), Klobuchar (D-MN)
Legislate Access to Treatment Sanders (I-VT)
Require Rebates to Mcare/caid Sanders (I-VT)
Drug Policy Legislation Introduced since 2015
Released: November 30, 2017
NASEM Rec A: Boost Generic Competition
• Pass legislation to eliminate pay-for-delay practice.
• Stop brand-name drugs from unfairly restricting access to samples that generic makers need to formulate competing drugs.
https://www.communitycatalyst.org/doc-store/publications/top-20-pay-for-delay-drugs.pdf
May 17, 2018 http://www.centerforbiosimilars.com/news/fda-names-companies-that-restrict-access-to-drug-samples-for-generic-testing
November 8, 2017 https://www.raps.org/regulatory-focus%E2%84%A2/news-articles/2017/11/gottlieb-end-the-shenanigans-on-delaying-generic-drug-competition
Requested Listed Drug InquiriesDrug Company # Inquiries
Absorica (isotretinoin) Ranbaxy 5
Exjade (deferasirox) Novartis 6
Letairis (ambrisentan) Giliad 10
Revlimid (lenalidomide) Celgene 13
Source: https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/HowDrugsareDevelopedandApproved/ApprovalApplications/AbbreviatedNewDrugApplicationANDAGenerics/ucm607738.htm
NASEM Rec B: Let Government be the Purchaser
• Because prices tend to be lower when the purchaser has bargaining power that is at least comparable to that of the seller, the United States could achieve lower prices for prescription drugs by consolidating bargaining power…
• The law bars the govt. from negotiating drug prices for Medicare Part D.• Other countries are able achieve lower prices through regulations and
negotiation.
• But U.S. policy makers were lobbied heavily by drug companies.
https://www.drugwatch.com/featured/us-drug-prices-higher-vs-world/
Source: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Making medicines affordable: A national imperative.
NASEM Rec C: Require Greater Price and Cost Transparency
Source: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Making medicines affordable: A national imperative.
Source: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Making medicines affordable: A national imperative.
Source: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Making medicines affordable: A national imperative.
Source: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Making medicines affordable: A national imperative.
Source: Kaiser Health News, May 30, 2018
Frequency and Mean Overpayment Among Pharmacy Claims with Patient Co-pay, 2013
Drugs No. of ClaimsFrequency of
Claims % with overpayment
Mean
All 9,539,846 22.94 7.69
Generic 7,295,525 28.17 7.32
Brand 2,244,321 5.95 13.46
Source: Van Nuys K. et al, JAMA 2018.
NASEM Rec G: Modify the 1983 Orphan Drug Act
• Cures for rare diseases – those affecting “less than 200,000 persons in the United States” and for which “there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and making available in the United States a drug for such disease or condition will be recovered from the sale in the United States.”
• Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Amendments of 1984, Public Law 98-551, 98 Stat 2815 (1984), § 4.
Benefits to Orphan Drug Makers
• 7 add’l years of patent protection.
• Expedited regulatory review process.• Including fewer patients required for clinical trials.
• Tax credits to help support drug testing.
• Orphan drugs have higher prices.
Problems with Orphan Drug Act
• Orphan drug status granted for a subset of possible patients, then use is marketed to a larger population.
• Rituximab granted orphan drug status to treat lymphoma• Now used for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, rheumatoid arthritis,
and several skin disorders.
• Orphan drugs that have reached blockbuster status (>$1b in sales)• Vioxx, Cialis, Botox
• Some drugs received multiple orphan designations.• Gleevec has had 9, w/ $3.3b in sales for 2016.
Top lobbying industries in the U.S. 2017
Top lobbying industries in the United States in 2017, by total lobbying spending (in million U.S. dollars)
Source: opensecrets.org; CRP ID 257364
Note: United States; 2017
279.57
160.7
146.2
137.27
126.09
114.16
103.4
100.81
97.3
91.51
91.18
91.04
86.24
81.99
79.62
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Pharmaceuticals/Health Products
Insurance
Electronics Mfg & Equip
Business Associations
Oil & Gas
Electric Utilities
Real Estate
Hospitals/Nursing Homes
Securities & Investment
Health Professionals
Misc Manufacturing & Distributing
Air Transport
Telecom Services
Health Services/HMOs
Education
Spending in million U.S. dollars
Further information regarding this statistic can be found on page 8.
4 Challenges
• High list prices for drugs
• Seniors and government programs overpaying for drugs due to lack of the latest negotiation tools
• High and rising out-of-pocket costs for consumers
• Foreign governments free-riding off of American investment in innovation
4 Key Strategies
• Improved competition
•Better negotiation
• Incentives for lower list prices
•Lowering out-of-pocket costs
Examples
• Stop brand name drugs from restricting access to samples needed by generic drug makers.
• Experiment with value-based purchasing in federal programs.
• Require manufacturers to include list prices in advertising.
• Prohibit gag clauses from insurer-pharmacist contracts.
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/411505-trump-administration-to-require-drug-companies-include-prices-in-ads
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/trump-signs-bills-lifting-pharmacist-gag-orders-drug-prices-n918721
https://www.forbes.com/sites/theapothecary/2018/10/26/trumps-dramatic-new-proposal-to-lower-medicare-drug-prices-by-linking-to-an-international-index/#25d27c554c3a
Concluding Remarks
• Rising drug prices are a threat to the affordability of health care and health insurance.
• Multiple policy options exist for restraining cost growth.
• Many options unlikely to discourage innovation.
• Lobbying by drug companies is preventing forceful policy action.
Can Public Policy Control Rising Drug Prices?
Thank you!
For a copy of the presentation email