capturing elusive level 3 data: the secrects of survey design · 3/22/2018  · phillips associates...

43
Phillips Associates 1 Capture Elusive Level 3 Data: The Secrets of Survey Design Presented by: Ken Phillips Phillips Associates March 22, 2018

Upload: others

Post on 02-Aug-2020

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Phillips Associates 1

    Capture Elusive Level 3 Data:

    The Secrets of Survey Design

    Presented by:Ken PhillipsPhillips AssociatesMarch 22, 2018

  • Phillips Associates 2

    Agenda

    1. Examine Level 3 evaluation facts2. Analyze survey creation errors in a

    sample Level 3 evaluation

    3. Discover 12 tips for creating valid, scientifically sound Level 3 evaluations

  • Phillips Associates 3

    Kirkpatrick / Phillips Evaluation Model

    Level 1: Reaction Degree to which participants find the training favorable, engaging, and relevant to their jobs

    Level 2: Learning

    Degree to which participants acquire the intended knowledge, skills, attitude, confidence and commitment based on their participation in the training

    Level 3: Behavior Degree to which participants apply what they learned during training when they are back on the job

    Level 4: ResultsDegree to which targeted outcomes improve as a result of the training, and the support and accountability package

    Level 5: ROI Degree to which monetary program benefits exceed program costs

  • Phillips Associates 4

    Level 3 Evaluation Facts

    Source: ATD Research Study, “Evaluating Learning Getting to Measurements That Matter,” 2015

    60%Organizations

    evaluate some

    programs

    at Level 3

    of live classroom

    programs being

    evaluated33%75%Organizations view

    data collected

    as having high

    or very high value18% of tech based programs beingevaluated

  • Phillips Associates 5

    Source: Donald & James Kirkpatrick, “Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels,” 2006.

    5

    Data Collection Methods

    Sheet1

    EVALUATION LEVELS

    METHODS1Reaction2Learning3Behavior4Results

    Survey/Questionnairesllll

    Interviewsllll

    Focus Groupsllll

    Knowledge Testingl

    Work Reviewll

    Structured Observationll

    Action Planningll

    HR/Business Unit Reportsll

    Key Performance Indicatorsl

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • Phillips Associates 6

    Possible Survey Respondents

    External customers

    Managers of learners

    Direct reportsPeers/ ColleaguesLearners

  • Phillips Associates 7

    How to Decide

    has first-hand knowledge of learners’ behavior?

    credible do results need to be?

    Who

    How

  • Phillips Associates 8

    Sample

    Level 3

    Participant Survey

  • Phillips Associates 9

    Instructions

    Note: Survey respondents are the direct reports of managers/ supervisors who attended an interpersonal feedback learning program.

    1. Form a group of 3, 4 or 5 persons2. Review sample Level 3 participant survey in

    handout and see how many different survey creation errors you can find (Hint: 9 different errors are built into the survey)

    3. Be prepared to discuss your findings with the whole group

  • Phillips Associates 10

    Scientifically Sound Survey Design

    Measurement

    ContentFormat

  • Phillips Associates

    Content

  • Phillips Associates 12

    8. Before providing employees with feedback about their job performance, my manager considers whether or not he or she is knowledgeable about their job.

    What’s Wrong With These?

    25. When giving feedback to an employee my manager considers whether it should be done privately or in the presence of others.

  • Phillips Associates 13

    Tip 1: Content

    Source: Palmer Morrel-Samuels, “Getting the Truth into Workplace Surveys”, Harvard Business Review, 2002.

    Focus on observable behavior

    not thoughts or motives.

  • Phillips Associates 14

    18. My manager provides employees with regular ongoing feedback about their job performance and speaks in a normal conversational tone or manner when delivering the feedback.

    What’s Wrong With These?

    14. My manager gives his or her employees feedback just as soon as possible after an event has happened and avoids getting emotional or evaluative.

  • Phillips Associates 15

    Tip 2: Content

    Limit each item to a

    single description of behavior.

    Source: Palmer Morrel-Samuels, 2002

  • Phillips Associates 16

    Example

    My manager gives his or her employees feedback just as soon as possible after an event has happened.

    My manager avoids getting emotional or evaluative when giving feedback to his or her employees.

  • Phillips Associates 17

    What’s Wrong With These?

    2. My manager doesn’t get to know his or her employees as individuals before providing them with feedback about their job performance.

    7. When giving employees feedback about their job performance, my manager doesn’t distinguish between patterns of behavior and random one-time events.

  • Phillips Associates 18

    Tip 3: Content

    Word about 1/3 of the survey items so that

    the desired answer is negative.

    Source: Palmer Morrel-Samuels, 2002

  • Phillips Associates 19

    Format

  • Phillips Associates 20

    What’s Wrong With These?

    Building Trust

    Credibility

    Feedback Sign

    Feedback Timing

    Feedback Frequency

    Message Characteristics

  • Phillips Associates 21

    Tip 4: Format

    Keep sections of the survey unlabeled.

    Source: Palmer Morrel-Samuels, 2002

  • Phillips Associates 22

    Source: Palmer Morrel-Samuels, 2002

    Design sections to contain

    a similar number of items

    and questions to contain

    a similar number of words.

    Tip 5: Format

  • Phillips Associates 23

    Source: Palmer Morrel-Samuels, 2002

    Tip 6: Format

    Place questions regarding

    respondent demographics

    (e.g. name, title, department, etc.)

    at end of survey, make completion optional

    and keep questions to a minimum.

  • Phillips Associates 24

    Measurement

  • Phillips Associates 25

    Source: Ken Phillips, “Capturing Elusive Level 3 Data: The Secrets of Survey Design”, Unpublished Article, 2013.

    Tip 7: Measurement

    Collect data from multiple observers

    or a single observer multiple times.

  • Phillips Associates 26

    What’s Wrong With This?

    StronglyAgree Agree Disagree

    StronglyDisagree N/A

    4 3 2 1

  • Phillips Associates 27

    *Palmer Morrel-Samuels, 2002.Source: Palmer Morrel-Samuels, 2002

    Tip 8: Measurement

    Create a response scale

    with numbers at regularly spaced intervals

    and words only at each end.

  • Phillips Associates 28

    ExamplesThis:

    Not This:

    Or This:

    Not at allTrue

    CompletelyTrue

    1 2 3 4 6 75

    Not at allTrue

    CompletelyTrue

    1 2 3 4 6 75

    RarelyTrue

    Occasionally True

    SomewhatTrue

    MostlyTrue

    Frequently True

    Not at allTrue

    CompletelyTrue

    RarelyTrue

    Occasionally True

    SomewhatTrue

    MostlyTrue

    Frequently True

  • Phillips Associates 29

    *Palmer Morrel-Samuels, 2002.Source: Palmer Morrel-Samuels, 2002

    Tip 9: Measurement

    Use only one response scale

    with an odd number of points

    (7, 9 & 11 point scales are best)

  • Phillips Associates 30

    Odd vs. Even Scale

    This:

    Not This:

  • Phillips Associates 31

    Tip 10: Measurement

    Use a response scale

    that measures frequency

    not agreement or effectiveness.

    Source: Palmer Morrel-Samuels, 2002

  • Phillips Associates 32

    Examples

    This:

    Or this:

    Never Always

    1 2 3 4 6 75

    Not at all True

    Completely True

    1 2 3 4 6 75

  • Phillips Associates 33

    Source: Ken Phillips, 2013

    Tip 11: Measurement

    Place small numbers

    at left or low end of scale

    and large numbers at right

    or high end of scale.

  • Phillips Associates 34

    ExamplesThis:

    Not at all True

    Completely True

    1 2 3 4 6 75

    Completely True

    Not at all True

    7 6 5 4 2 13

    Not This:

  • Phillips Associates 35

    *Palmer Morrel-Samuels, 2002.Source: Palmer Morrel-Samuels, 2002

    Tip 12: Measurement

    Include a

    “Did Not Observe” response choice

    and make it different.

  • Phillips Associates 36

    Example

    Not at all True

    Completely True

    1 2 3 4 6 75

    Did Not Observe

  • Phillips Associates 37

    Summary: Content

    Focus on observable behavior

    Limit ideas to a single description of behavior

    Word 1/3 of items as reverse score

  • Phillips Associates 38

    Summary: Format

    Keep survey sections unlabeled

    Design sections to contain similar number of items & questions similar number of words

    Place questions regarding respondent demographics at end of survey, make completion optional and keep questions to a minimum

  • Phillips Associates 39

    Summary: Measurement

    Collect data from multiple observers or multiple times

    Create a response scale that: Has words only at each end Has an odd number of points Measures frequency Has small numbers at left and large numbers

    at right Includes a “Did Not Observe” that is different

  • Phillips Associates 40

    Source: Palmer Morrel-Samuels, 2002

    The difference between a good survey

    and a bad one… quite simply, is careful

    and informed design.

  • Phillips Associates 41

  • Phillips Associates 42

    Phillips, Ken, “Eight Tips on Developing Valid Level 1Evaluation Forms”, Training Today, Fall 2007, pps. 8 & 14.

    Phillips, Ken, “Developing Valid Level 2 Evaluations”, Training Today, Fall 2009, pps. 6-8.

    Phillips, Ken, “Capturing Elusive Level 3 Data: The Secrets of Survey Design”, Unpublished article, 2013.

    Phillips, Ken, “Level 1 Evaluations: Do They Have a Role in Organizational Learning Strategy?”, Unpublished article, 2013.

    Phillips, Ken, “Business Results Made Visible: Designing Proof Positive Level 4 Evaluations”, Unpublished article, 2013.

    Free Articles

  • Phillips Associates 43

    Phillips [email protected](847) 231-6068

    www.phillipsassociates.com

    34137 N. Wooded Glen Drive

    Grayslake, Illinois 60030

    Ken Phillips

    Slide Number 1AgendaKirkpatrick / Phillips Evaluation ModelLevel 3 Evaluation FactsData Collection MethodsPossible Survey RespondentsHow to DecideSample�Level 3�Participant SurveyInstructionsSlide Number 10Slide Number 11Slide Number 12Slide Number 13Slide Number 14Slide Number 15ExampleWhat’s Wrong With These?Tip 3: ContentSlide Number 19Slide Number 20Slide Number 21Tip 5: FormatTip 6: FormatSlide Number 24Slide Number 25What’s Wrong With This?Slide Number 27ExamplesSlide Number 29Odd vs. Even ScaleSlide Number 31ExamplesSlide Number 33ExamplesSlide Number 35ExampleSummary: ContentSummary: FormatSummary: MeasurementSlide Number 40Slide Number 41�Free ArticlesSlide Number 43