carbon capture and utilization for transport...
TRANSCRIPT
Carbon Capture and Utilizationfor Transport purposes
19th World Ethanol & Biofuels 2016
10 November 2016, Brussels (Belgium)
Green CO2 Markets
Company Presentation
2
• Existing company since 1990 as consultant for client
engineering and project management
• Since 2012 continuous development in the field of
CO2 utilization
• Different speeches and expert consultations on
international conferences and EU commission
• New market development for small scale methanol
plants
• Various project developments for E-Methanol plants
up to 100,000 t
• Initiator of full service package (EPCM) of small
scale Methanol plants including engineering,
licensing and execution
Some of our ClientsOver 25 years of Success
3
• Future Challenges
• Technical Solution
• Market conditions
• Legal conditions
Content
4
Emission Savings From Carbon Capture and ReplacementFuture Challenges
• Value of Ethanol is based on GHG emission savings
• How to improve the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions
per unit in existing Ethanol plants?
5
Creating an energy carrier in the transport fuel market!
Carbon Utilisation From FeedstockMass Balance
6
Co
nve
rsio
n
100 %
Carbon
in
Feedstock
45 %
23 %
26 %
EtOH
CO2
DDGS
Wheat
The carbon utilisation of feedstock can be increased from 45 % to 68 %
by using CCR!
Power Production in GermanyFuture Challenges
• Power export balance Germany in 2015 was 47 TWh
• Emission load for Germany 30 Mio. tCO2/a
• Deactivation and payment of renewable energy plants
6 TWh
• Additional saving demand 22 Mio. t up to 2020
• Missing grid infrastructure reduce the renewable power
production capacity
• Missing the climate targets 2020
• 730 TWh consumption in the transport sector in 2014
7Solution must be the Chemical Energy storage!
Identified Chemical Energy StorageVolume of Different Energy Sources
0,6
1,0
1,9
9,1
24,0
0
1
10
100
Synthetic fuels Methanol* Methane (200bar)* Hydrogen Lithium-Ionen-Akku
Vo
lum
en
in
m³
Storage of 4,800 kWh
*Calculation without conversion losses based on the lower heat values
8
• Future Challenges
• Technical Solution
• Market conditions
• Legal conditions
Content
9
First Step is ElectrolysisProduction of Advanced Fuels
10
Water electrolysis:
Alternative chloralkali electrolysis:
Alkaline electrolyser 2 MWO2
H2
H2O
ElectricityElectrolysis
Identified Advanced FuelsTechnical Solution
Property Hydrogen Methane MethanolSynthetic
hydrocarbons
Hazard
(2)* (2) (3) (4)
Density0,0899 kg/m³
(4)
0,656 kg/m³
(3)
792 kg/m³
(1)
720…775 kg/m³
(1)
Energy density120 MJ/kg
(1)
50 MJ/kg
(2)
20 MJ/kg
(3)
40 MJ/kg
(2)
Molecular
effusion
Very high
(5)
High
(4)
Medium
(3)
Medium
(3)
Ignition
temperature
560 °C
(2)
595 °C
(2)
455 °C
(2)
200…410 °C
(3)
Degree of
performance (Ø)
Satisfying
2.8
Satisfying
2.6
Good
2.4
Good
2.6
11*Number in brackets is the position of the evaluation.
Second Step is Methanol SynthesisProduction of Advanced Fuels
Catalytic, exothermic reaction of CO2 and H2 to Methanol
and Water
12
O2
H2
H2O
Electricity
ElectrolysisMethanolSynthesis
CO2
CH3OH
Methanol plant Island
H2O
Bio-MProduction of Bio-Methanol from Biogenic CO2 Sources
Objectives:
• Development of a new flexible and sustainable process for producing methanol from biogenic carbon dioxide and „green“ hydrogen
• Demonstrate technical feasibility and industrial relevance
• Evaluation of stress resistant, stable catalyst which comply with the needs of a dynamic energy market
Project duration:
• 2015-10-01 – 2017-06-30
Consortium
13
Screening catalystBio-M
14
Testing commercial catalyst:
Proofing of CO2
Definition of the performing
data
Evaluation of physic and
chemical stress relevance
under fluctuated conditions
Identification „best-case“
Catalyst for fluctuated
Optimization of the rectorBio-M
15
• CFD-simulation inside the reactor
• Target:
- Optimal Heat and flow management
- Efficient maintenance
- Yield increasing
- Shortened start up shut down
Fluctuate Conditions and FeedsProcess Flow
16Source: Bio-M
Simulation of the process under fluctuating conditions
Fluctuate Conditions and FeedsCatalyst Activity
170 20 40 60
4000000
6000000
8000000
10000000
12000000
Are
a C
H3O
H
TOS in h
CO/CO2-feed
CO2-feed
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160
0
5000000
10000000
15000000
20000000
CO/CO2-feed
2. N2O RFC
CO2-feed
CO/CO2-feed
Are
a C
H3O
H
TOS in h
CO/CO2-feed
1. N2O RFC
30 bar
0 20 40 60 80
5000000
5500000
6000000
6500000
7000000
Are
a C
H3O
H
TOS in h
Methanol: Referenz B
Source: Bio-M
Fluctuate Conditions and FeedsTotal Efficiency and Energy Balance
Total Energy Demand
• Power demand electrolysis 10 MW
• Electricity compressor 0.260 MW
• Steam 0.438 MW
Energy Output
• Heat to Beer Preheater (85°C) 2.988 MW
• Methanol 4.950 MW
Total Efficiency app. 74 %
18Source: Bio-M
Mass BalanceMethanol (based on 1,0 tCO2/h)
19
Ethanolproduction
Electrolysis
Steamgeneration
Methanol synthesis
C2H5OH1t/h
CH3OH
H2O
H2O Steam
CO2
O2
H2
1.23 t/h
1.09 t/h 0.14 t/h
1.00 t/h
0.7 t/h
0.41 t/h
Energy BalanceMethanol (based on 1,0 tCO2/h)
Echem
Echem
Eel
Echem
Etherm
CO2
Echem 4.3 MWh
Etherm
Ethanolproduction
Electrolysis
Steamgeneration
Methanol synthesis
O2
20
6.7 MWh
0.3 MWh
4.0 MWh
Etherm
2.4 MWh80 °C
• Future Challenges
• Technical Solution
• Market conditions
• Legal conditions
Content
21
Usage of Methanol by End-Use
22
Energy DensityChemical Power Storage vs E-Mobility
1 cubic meter of liquefied power E-Methanol compares
with 222 BMW i3 (electric fuel car)!*
1 m³ E-Methanol
=
*Storage capacity of one BMW i3 is 21,6 kWh.
23
Market Volume
Large Methanol demand in transport sector (EU 2015):
• MTBE 5.5 Mio. t/y
• Biodiesel 1.1 Mio. t/y
• Direct blending gasoline (potential) 4.2 Mio. t/y
Demand of Advanced Fuels (EU target 2020):
• 1.4 Mio. t/y Methanol in gasoline to achieve the 0.5% sub target
This requires 40 Methanol plants (~ 30,000 t/y)
Potential investment: ~ 2.0 Billion €
Demand of flexibility of the power system in Germany:
• Up to 2.0 Mio. t/y
This requires 20 Methanol plants (~ 100,000 t/y)
Potential investment: ~ 2.9 Billion €
24
Methanol and
Small-Scale Methanol
Plants are the present
solution of the energy
transition.
Methanol as Fuel Applications
Application Description
Substitute for gasoline (direct
blending) +
The direct blending to gasoline is possible up to 3 wt.% without any
technical modifications of the engines, but a solubilizing is necessary
which is to take into account in pricing.
+The distribution channel is existent and corresponds to that of
Bioethanol.
+ The exemption from the energy tax is not final clarified.
Substitute for gasoline by further
processing into MTBE (Methyl-tert-
butyether)
+The blending of MTBE is possible without technical modification and is
State-of-the-Art.
+The distribution channel is existent and corresponds to that of
Bioethanol.
+The further processing of methanol to MTBE is an additional value of
the refineries.
- An additional processing step is necessary.
Catalyst for the production of Biodiesel+
The usage of renewable methanol as catalyst for Biodiesel can be
support the reduction of GHG-emissions.
+High added value, pricing is based on the effect of GHG-emission
saving and not by energy content.
25
Example CAPEX / OPEXSmall-Scale Methanol Plant
26
Name Value (approx)
Plant capacity 10 MW
Investment cost ~ 20 Mio €
Running cost (ex
power)~ 2.4 Mio €
Potential Revenues* ~ 4.7 Mio €
ROI 12 %
Amortisation 5,85 a
Efficiency > 74 %
energy
fuel
Market flexibility
stable growth market
• Future Challenges
• Technical Solution
• Market conditions
• Legal conditions
Content
27
Definition of new Advanced Fuels in the Amended RED/FQD Since 09/2015
28
Article 2 Number 10 FQD (NEW)
ANNEX IX Part A. RED (NEW)
Article 7a 6 b) FQD (NEW)
ANNEX IX Part A. RED (NEW)
renewable liquid and gaseous transport
fuels of non-biological origin” means liquid
or gaseous fuels other than biofuels whose
energy content comes from renewable
energy sources other than biomass, and
which are used in transport
Carbon capture and utilization for
transport purposes, if the energy
source is renewable
Suited for Methanol from CO2 in Bioethanol
production if renewable power stems from
wind or solar
Suited for Methanol from CO2 and
renewable energy of biomass
Default Values exist!
Hence suited for GHG quota
Default Values have to be established by
2017!
Hence risk for use on GHG obligation
This improve the emission savings up to
74 %
79 %
GHG Saving RED EthanolStand Alone Plant – Usage of CCR
29
Default Value Wheat Ethanol 44 gCO2eq/MJ
Default Value sugar beet Ethanol 40 gCO2eq/MJ
Minus emission savings from CCR 22,2 gCO2eq/MJ
Actual Emissions Future Emissions
GHG SavingPower Input as Feedstock
Therefore the CO2 footprint has to be defined for chemical energy storage and power system service.
Power is feedstock and national GHG emission footprint of power has to be used. Carbon capture and utilization for transport purposes has no Default Value. According to FQD the GHG intensity of the eec (Power or hydrogen as feedstock) has to be considered in the calculation of actual value.
30
References of bse
31
• 2014 Feasibility study MeOH from
Bioethanol CO2 50 MW
• 2015 Start Bio-M: Intermitting MeOH
production from green CO2, Germany
• 2015/16 Business case study chemical energy
storages via MeOH
• 2016 Pre-Engineering MeOH from flue gas
CO2 WtE 5 MW
• 2016 Pre-Engineering MeOH from flue gas
CO2 WtE 10 MW
• 2016 Pre-Engineering MeOH from flue gas
CO2 WtE 1 MW
• 2016 Strategy development of 2 biomass
power plant for integrated chemical
CO2 utilization 100 MW
How we will ExecuteMain Units and our Consortium
32
Methanol
Offtake
CO2-Separation
Licencing
Methanol Synthesis
Electrolysis
Methanol Distillation
Power Supply
Mode
Reference LettersSupport from Key Players
33
Thank you for your attention!
Christian Schweitzer
Mottelerstrasse 8
04155 Leipzig, Germany
phone +49 341 609 12 0
fax +49 341 609 12 15
email [email protected]
web www.bse-engineering.de
bse Engineering Leipzig GmbH