carbon report - seb group · carbon report - seb euroland free of management fee summary of 10...
TRANSCRIPT
Carbon ReportSEB Euroland Free of Management Fee
Report created on: Feb 25, 2019
The carbon footprint provides a historic snapshotof the emissions from the equity holdings of thefund. The calculations are not comprehensive andindirect emissions, e.g. from suppliers, are basedon reported data or estimates of emissions. Themetric says nothing about how the portfoliocontributes to a low-carbon society. For furtherinformation about the metric, seewww.sebgroup.com.
Carbon Report - SEB Euroland Free of Management Fee
Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3Executive Summary
. . . . . . . . 4Sector weighting and relative carbon footprint . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Relative Carbon Footprint Comparison
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4Sector Analysis & Stock Selection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5Attribution Analysis
. . . . . . . . . 6Summary of 10 largest absolute contributors . . . . . . . . . . 6Summary of 10 largest portfolio companies
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7Scope 3 Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8Company Sector & Breakdown
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10Carbon Ranking
2
Carbon Report - SEB Euroland Free of Management Fee
Carbon ReportSEB Euroland Free of Management FeeReport created on: Feb 25, 2019 | Holdings Date: Dec 31, 2018 | Benchmark: Nasdaq Euro 50 Index (Net Return Index)Currency: EUR | Industry Classification: GICS | Company Breakdown Metrics: carbon intensity (tCO2e / Mio. revenue) | Value: 18'331'860.00 EURFund Management Company: SEB Investment Management AB
Executive SummaryCarbon emissions
Scope 1-2(tCO2e)
Total carbonemissions incl.
Scope 3 (tCO2e)
Relative CarbonFootprint
(kgCO2e / EUR1'000 invested)
Carbon Intensity(kgCO2e / EUR
1'000 revenue)
WeightedAverage Carbon
Intensity (kgCO2e/ EUR 1'000
revenue)
DisclosingTitles
by Weight(market value)
Portfolio 3'321.0 14'549.4 181.2 232.8 189.5 97.8% 100.0%
Benchmark 3'222.0 13'614.4 175.8 228.3 190.6 98.0% 100.0%
Total carbon emissions
- measure the carbon footprint of a portfolioconsidering Scope 1-2 as well as Scope 3emissions.*)
- SEB Euroland Free of Management Fee isassociated with greenhouse gas emissionsof 3'321.0 tons per year.
Relative carbon footprint
- is a normalized measure of the portfolio'scontribution.
- It enables comparisons with a benchmarkbetween multiple portfolios, over time andregardless of portfolio size.
Carbon intensity
- allows investors to measure how muchcarbon emissions per EUR of revenue aregenerated.
- It therefore measures the carbon efficiencyof a portfolio per unit of output.
This report analyses the portfolio of securities in terms of thecarbon emissions and other carbon related characteristics ofthe underlying portfolio companies, and compares this data tothe performance of a relevant respectively chosen marketbenchmark.
The portfolio’s intensity is 1.9% higher than the benchmark.
100.0 100.098.1 97.0
Carbon Intensity Carbon Emissions0.0
20.0
40.0
60.0
80.0
100.0
120.0
Portfolio Benchmark
The Sectors Utilities, Energy and Materials (per GICS classification) inthe portfolio make up 17.8% of the weight vs. 91.1% of thecontribution to emissions.
3.5%7.9%
6.5%
82.2%
49.6%
23.9%
17.7%
8.9%
Sector Weight Contribution to Emissions
UtilitiesEnergyMaterialsAll other Sectors
5 smallest contributors to the emissions of the fund are:Financed
emissions(tCO2e)
% of total Relative carbonfootprint
(kg CO2e / EUR 1'000Invested)
ING Groep 0.3 0.0% 0.7
Amadeus IT 0.3 0.0% 1.4
Adidas 0.5 0.0% 1.6
Intesa Sanpaolo 0.5 0.0% 1.6
L'oreal Ord 0.6 0.0% 1.1
5 largest contributors to the emissions of the fund are:Financed
emissions(tCO2e)
% of total Relative carbonfootprint
(kg CO2e / EUR 1'000Invested)
ENGIE 833.7 25.1% 3'486.9
Enel SPA 812.2 24.5% 2'020.2
Total 504.3 15.2% 464.1
Eni 288.1 8.7% 798.6
Air Liquide 250.7 7.5% 550.6
*) Scope 1 emissions are directly generated by company's operations, whereas indirect Scope 2 emissions are related to the company's energy consumption. Scope 3 emissions include other indirect emissions
including e.g. business travel, use of company's products sold, investments, and goods and services purchased.
3
Carbon Report - SEB Euroland Free of Management Fee
Sector weighting and relative carbon footprint
WeightRel. Carbon Footprint
tCO2e / Mio EUR invested Portfolio vs.Benchmark
Portfolio Benchmark Portfolio Benchmark
Utilities 3.50% 5.05% 2'567.2 1'826.9 40.52%
Energy 7.90% 7.03% 547.5 547.5 -0.00%
Materials 6.46% 5.74% 496.2 496.2 -0.00%
Consumer Staples 15.35% 13.66% 30.6 30.6 0.06%
Consumer Discretionary 14.47% 12.88% 25.6 25.6 0.05%
Industrials 9.39% 12.35% 37.1 29.6 25.39%
TelecommunicationServices
3.45% 5.48% 43.1 45.1 -4.41%
Health Care 7.09% 8.97% 13.7 15.3 -10.16%
Information Technology 11.56% 10.29% 8.3 8.3 -0.01%
Financials 20.84% 18.55% 3.8 3.8 -0.00%
Relative Carbon Footprint Comparison
Util
ities
Ener
gy
Mat
eria
ls
Cons
umer
Sta
ples
Cons
umer
Dis
cret
iona
ry
Indu
stria
lsTe
leco
mm
unic
atio
n Se
rvic
es
Hea
lth C
are
Info
rmat
ion
Tech
nolo
gy
Fina
ncia
ls0.0
500.0
1000.0
1500.0
2000.0
2500.0
3000.0
Portfolio Benchmark
Sector Analysis & Stock SelectionThe graph below shows how the carbon allocation in the portfolio differs from the average ofeach sector. Sectors have been defined using the GICS classification at theSupersector/Industry Group level.
Air
Frei
ght &
Log
istic
s
App
arel
, Acc
esso
ries
& Lu
xury
Goo
dsA
utom
obile
Man
ufac
ture
rsCo
nstr
uctio
n &
Engi
neer
ing
Cons
truc
tion
Mat
eria
lsD
iver
sifie
d Ch
emic
als
Elec
tric
Util
ities
Food
Ret
ail
Indu
stria
l Con
glom
erat
esIn
dust
rial G
ases
Inte
grat
ed O
il &
Gas
Mul
ti-U
tiliti
esPa
ckag
ed F
oods
& M
eats
Pers
onal
Pro
duct
sSe
mic
ondu
ctor
Equ
ipm
ent
0%
10%
20%
30%
Portfolio GICS Sub-Industry Emissions
Benchmark, Average GICS Sub-Industry Emissions
4
Carbon Report - SEB Euroland Free of Management Fee
Attribution AnalysisThe two principal reasons why the carbon exposure of the portfoliomay differ from the benchmark are due to sector allocation as well asstock selection decisions.Sector allocation decision will cause the carbon intensity of theportfolio to diverge from the benchmark where the sectors are eithercarbon intensive or low carbon. If the portfolio is overweight incarbon intensive sectors the portfolio is likely to be more carbonintensive than the benchmark.However, if the stocks within a carbon intensive sector are the mostcarbon efficient companies, it is possible that the portfolio may stillhave a lower carbon footprint than the benchmark.
Sector Allocation Sector Selection
Sector AllocationContribution to Out/Underperformance
(tCO2e)
Sector AllocationContribution to Out/
Underperformance (%)
Stock SelectionContribution to Out/Underperformance
(tCO2e)
Stock SelectionContribution to Out/
Underperformance (%)
Energy 87.0 2.7% -0.0 -0.0%
Materials 64.9 2.0% -0.0 -0.0%
Industrials -16.1 -0.5% 17.0 0.5%
Consumer Discretionary 7.5 0.2% 0.0 0.0%
Consumer Staples 9.4 0.3% 0.0 0.0%
Health Care -5.3 -0.2% -2.6 -0.1%
Financials 1.6 0.0% -0.0 -0.0%
Information Technology 1.9 0.1% -0.0 -0.0%
Telecommunication Services -16.7 -0.5% -2.0 -0.1%
Utilities -519.4 -16.1% 685.0 21.3%
Total -385.2 -12.0% 697.5 21.6%
Explanation: The Underperformance of the portfolio is based on theeffect of over/underweighting certain sectors and selectingmore/less carbon intense stocks within each sector for each of theunderlying holdings. A positive number indicates that the effectincreased the greenhouse gas emission (in tons of CO2e) and anegative number indicated a decreasing effect.In this case, the sector weighting of SEB Euroland Free ofManagement Fee saved 385.2 tCO2e, while the stock selectionharmed 697.5 tCO2e versus the benchmark. This explains a 12.0%outperformance through sector weighting and 21.6% carbonunderperformance by stock picking.
Total Emissions(tCO2e)
Portfolio 3'321.0
Benchmark 3'222.0
Portfolio Carbon Underperformance (tCO2e) 99.0
Portfolio Carbon Underperformance (%) 3.1
Interaction Effect: -213.3 -6.6%
Attribution Analysis - Graph
Ener
gy
Mat
eria
ls
Indu
stria
lsCo
nsum
er D
iscr
etio
nary
Cons
umer
Sta
ples
Hea
lth C
are
Fina
ncia
lsIn
form
atio
n Te
chno
logy
Tele
com
mun
icat
ion
Serv
ices
Util
ities
-20%
-10%
0%
10%
20%
30%
Sector Stock Total
5
Carbon Report - SEB Euroland Free of Management Fee
Summary of 10 largest absolute contributorsThe tables below show the 10 largest greenhouse gas contributorsand the 10 largest holdings respectively of the SEB Euroland Free ofManagement Fee.
Carbon Data section explains your Financed Emissions, i.e. theamount of greenhouse gases that the portfolio finances from thecompany’s overall emissions, relative to company ownership. Youcan further see what % of the overall portfolio GHG emissions eachcompany accounts for and if the company’s GHG emission numberwas disclosed by the company or approximated.
In the Analysis section, the Benchmark emissions are stated and theAverage Sector Emissions allow a comparison of the greenhouse gasintensity of a company against its respective sector, i.e. the amount ofGHG emissions that an investment of the same size would havefinanced, would it have been invested in the overall sector ratherthan the specific company.
The effect on the portfolio can be found under PortfolioContribution: This is a measurement of how much a specific holdingraises or reduces the carbon footprint of the portfolio.
Weight Carbon Data Analysis
Company GICS Sub-Industry Portfolio Benchmark % oftotal
carbonintensity
(tCO2e / Mio.revenue)
FinancedEmissions
(tCO2e)
BenchmarkEmissions
(tCO2e)
Av. SectorEmissions
(tCO2e)
PortfolioContribution
(tCO2e)
ENGIE Multi-Utilities 1.3% 1.2% 25.1% 1'995.3 833.7 742.3 634.4 -800.81
Enel SPA Electric Utilities 2.2% 2.0% 24.5% 1'677.6 812.2 723.1 905.5 -755.95
Total Integrated Oil & Gas 5.9% 5.3% 15.2% 484.6 504.3 448.9 778.8 -326.85
Eni Integrated Oil & Gas 2.0% 1.8% 8.7% 784.5 288.1 256.5 258.6 -227.20
Air Liquide Industrial Gases 2.5% 2.2% 7.5% 1'492.1 250.7 223.1 369.2 -172.47
CRH (Dublin) Construction Materials 1.1% 0.9% 6.3% 1'076.0 207.8 184.8 588.4 -174.24
Basf Diversified Chemicals 2.9% 2.6% 3.9% 386.8 128.9 114.6 404.1 -33.30
Ahold Koninklijke Food Retail 1.4% 1.2% 1.4% 92.3 46.4 41.3 34.9 -0.46
Volkswagen AutomobileManufacturers
1.6% 1.4% 1.0% 47.3 33.1 29.4 27.2 20.82
Deutsche Post Air Freight & Logistics 1.2% 1.1% 0.9% 121.4 29.5 26.2 80.2 11.60
Summary of 10 largest portfolio companies
Weight Carbon Data Analysis
Company GICS Sub-Industry Portfolio Benchmark % oftotal
carbonintensity
(tCO2e / Mio.revenue)
FinancedEmissions
(tCO2e)
BenchmarkEmissions
(tCO2e)
Av. SectorEmissions
(tCO2e)
PortfolioContribution
(tCO2e)
Total Integrated Oil & Gas 5.9% 5.3% 15.2% 484.6 504.3 448.9 778.8 -326.85
Unilever NV Personal Products 4.6% 4.1% 0.3% 34.7 10.2 9.1 18.3 148.58
SAP Application Software 4.6% 4.1% 0.0% 7.3 1.1 1.0 3.1 158.03
Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceuticals 4.5% 4.0% 0.3% 28.7 8.3 7.4 10.5 148.87
Siemens IndustrialConglomerates
4.1% 3.6% 0.4% 21.0 13.0 11.6 93.9 128.57
Allianz Multi-line Insurance 3.9% 3.5% 0.1% 2.2 1.8 1.6 7.7 132.70
Lvmh Louis VuittonMoet Hennessy
Apparel, Accessories &Luxury Goods
3.9% 3.5% 0.1% 11.0 2.2 1.9 12.7 132.12
Banco SantanderCentral Hispano
Diversified Banks 3.4% 3.1% 0.1% 3.8 2.4 2.2 3.8 115.31
ASML Holding SemiconductorEquipment
3.1% 2.7% 0.0% 16.9 1.4 1.3 28.0 103.45
Anheuser-Busch Inbev Brewers 2.9% 2.6% 0.4% 119.7 13.7 12.2 22.2 85.49
6
Carbon Report - SEB Euroland Free of Management Fee
Scope 3 OverviewThe following section provides a top-down approximation of thefinanced scope 3 emissions from each sector. The purpose of thisanalysis is to give an order of magnitude of the emissions in theportfolio on a sector level and should not be used as a basis forcomparing two individual companies.The methodology includes Scope 1, 2 and Scope 3 upstream andproduct use downstream.
The following graph shows the financed scope 1+2 emissions inrelation to the scope 3 emissions of the portfolio.
Energy Materials Industrials ConsumerDiscretionary
ConsumerStaples
HealthCare
Financials InformationTechnology
TelecommunicationServices
Utilities0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
7'204
792
816
587
173
64
378
68
233
86
41
18
58
15
45
17
57
27
2'224
1'646Scope 3Scope 1&2
The graph below compares the total emissions (including Scope 1,Scope2 and Scope 3) between portfolio and benchmark.
Portfolio Benchmark0
5000
10000
15000
11'228
3'321
10'392
3'222Scope 3Scope 1&2
*) The methodology includes Scope 1, 2 and Scope 3 upstream and product use downstream.
7
Carbon Report - SEB Euroland Free of Management Fee
Company Sector & BreakdownThis table presents all holdings in the portfolio, sorted by sector,following the logic from the sections above.
It shows how each company contributes to the overall portfoliofootprint. It allows you to see which stocks are the greatestcontributors to the portfolio’s emission in absolute as well as relativeterms.
The -/+ signs on the far right indicate if a specific holding raises orreduces the carbon footprint of the portfolio. This helps with portfoliooptimization and in managing the overall carbon portfolio footprintwithout comprising the chosen sector allocation.
Weight Carbon Data Analysis
Company Portfolio Benchmark % of total carbon intensity(tCO2e / Mio.
revenue)
FinancedEmissions
(tCO2e)
BenchmarkEmissions
(tCO2e)
Av. SectorEmissions
(tCO2e)
PortfolioContribution
(tCO2e)
Integrated Oil & Gas 7.9% 7.0% 23.9% 562.9 792.4 705.4 1'037.4 -575.7 -
Total 5.9% 5.3% 15.2% 484.6 504.3 448.9 778.8 -326.8
Eni 2.0% 1.8% 8.7% 784.5 288.1 256.5 258.6 -227.2
Diversified Chemicals 2.9% 2.6% 3.9% 386.8 128.9 114.6 404.1 -33.3 -
Basf 2.9% 2.6% 3.9% 386.8 128.9 114.6 404.1 -33.3
Industrial Gases 2.5% 2.2% 7.5% 1'492.1 250.7 223.1 369.2 -172.5 -
Air Liquide 2.5% 2.2% 7.5% 1'492.1 250.7 223.1 369.2 -172.5
Construction Materials 1.1% 0.9% 6.3% 1'076.0 207.8 184.8 588.4 -174.2 -
CRH (Dublin) 1.1% 0.9% 6.3% 1'076.0 207.8 184.8 588.4 -174.2
Construction & Engineering 2.2% 2.0% 0.5% 62.7 17.8 15.8 69.8 56.7 +
Vinci 2.2% 2.0% 0.5% 62.7 17.8 15.8 69.8 56.7
Electrical Components & Equipment 1.8% 1.6% 0.1% 20.3 3.7 3.3 13.7 58.8 +
Schneider Electric 1.8% 1.6% 0.1% 20.3 3.7 3.3 13.7 58.8
Industrial Conglomerates 4.1% 3.6% 0.4% 21.0 13.0 11.6 93.9 128.6 +
Siemens 4.1% 3.6% 0.4% 21.0 13.0 11.6 93.9 128.6
Air Freight & Logistics 1.2% 1.1% 0.9% 121.4 29.5 26.2 80.2 11.6 +
Deutsche Post 1.2% 1.1% 0.9% 121.4 29.5 26.2 80.2 11.6
Auto Parts & Equipment 0.7% 0.7% 0.3% 80.5 8.9 8.0 11.7 15.6 +
Continental Gummi - Werke 0.7% 0.7% 0.3% 80.5 8.9 8.0 11.7 15.6
Automobile Manufacturers 5.0% 4.5% 1.6% 30.2 54.0 48.0 84.9 119.5 +
BMW stamm 1.3% 1.1% 0.2% 16.3 5.8 5.2 21.4 36.9
Daimler 2.2% 1.9% 0.5% 20.6 15.1 13.4 36.3 57.9
Volkswagen 1.6% 1.4% 1.0% 47.3 33.1 29.4 27.2 20.8
Apparel, Accessories & Luxury Goods 7.3% 6.5% 0.1% 8.3 3.5 3.1 23.8 257.1 +
Adidas 1.7% 1.5% 0.0% 3.1 0.5 0.4 5.5 55.9
Lvmh Louis Vuitton Moet Hennessy 3.9% 3.5% 0.1% 11.0 2.2 1.9 12.7 132.1
Kering 1.7% 1.5% 0.0% 11.8 0.9 0.8 5.7 57.5
Apparel Retail 1.4% 1.3% 0.0% 28.8 1.6 1.4 5.4 45.9 +
Inditex 1.4% 1.3% 0.0% 28.8 1.6 1.4 5.4 45.9
Food Retail 1.4% 1.2% 1.4% 92.3 46.4 41.3 34.9 -0.5 -
Ahold Koninklijke 1.4% 1.2% 1.4% 92.3 46.4 41.3 34.9 -0.5
Brewers 2.9% 2.6% 0.4% 119.7 13.7 12.2 22.2 85.5 +
Anheuser-Busch Inbev 2.9% 2.6% 0.4% 119.7 13.7 12.2 22.2 85.5
Distillers & Vintners 1.5% 1.3% 0.1% 41.0 2.6 2.3 5.4 46.4 +
Pernod Ricard 1.5% 1.3% 0.1% 41.0 2.6 2.3 5.4 46.4
Packaged Foods & Meats 2.2% 2.0% 0.4% 71.7 12.5 11.2 37.5 62.9 +
Groupe Danone 2.2% 2.0% 0.4% 71.7 12.5 11.2 37.5 62.9
Personal Products 7.4% 6.6% 0.3% 26.5 10.8 9.6 29.5 252.4 +
L'oreal Ord 2.8% 2.5% 0.0% 5.2 0.6 0.5 11.2 94.7
Unilever NV 4.6% 4.1% 0.3% 34.7 10.2 9.1 18.3 148.6
Health Care Equipment 1.7% 1.5% 0.1% 18.9 4.3 3.9 2.6 51.4 +
Koninklijke Philips 1.7% 1.5% 0.1% 18.9 4.3 3.9 2.6 51.4
Health Care Services 0.9% 0.8% 0.2% 41.6 5.1 4.6 3.4 25.1 +
Fresenius Ordinarie 0.9% 0.8% 0.2% 41.6 5.1 4.6 3.4 25.1
Pharmaceuticals 4.5% 6.7% 0.3% 28.7 8.3 16.7 10.5 148.9 +
Sanofi-Aventis 4.5% 4.0% 0.3% 28.7 8.3 7.4 10.5 148.9
8
Carbon Report - SEB Euroland Free of Management Fee
Weight Carbon Data Analysis
Company Portfolio Benchmark % of total carbon intensity(tCO2e / Mio.
revenue)
FinancedEmissions
(tCO2e)
BenchmarkEmissions
(tCO2e)
Av. SectorEmissions
(tCO2e)
PortfolioContribution
(tCO2e)
Diversified Banks 13.5% 12.0% 0.3% 4.8 11.0 9.8 15.0 506.6 +
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria 1.6% 1.5% 0.1% 9.3 2.2 1.9 1.8 53.0
Banco Santander Central Hispano 3.4% 3.1% 0.1% 3.8 2.4 2.2 3.8 115.3
Societe Generale SA 1.1% 1.0% 0.0% 5.5 1.3 1.2 1.2 36.4
BNP Paribas 2.4% 2.2% 0.1% 6.0 2.2 1.9 2.7 80.0
Intesa Sanpaolo 1.7% 1.5% 0.0% 3.6 0.5 0.4 1.9 56.3
UniCredit SpA 1.2% 1.1% 0.1% 6.7 2.2 2.0 1.3 37.5
ING Groep 2.1% 1.8% 0.0% 0.7 0.3 0.2 2.3 69.6
Multi-line Insurance 5.8% 5.2% 0.1% 1.8 2.7 2.4 11.6 202.5 +
Allianz 3.9% 3.5% 0.1% 2.2 1.8 1.6 7.7 132.7
Axa-Uap 1.9% 1.7% 0.0% 1.2 0.8 0.7 3.8 64.5
Reinsurance 1.5% 1.3% 0.0% 1.7 0.9 0.8 0.5 49.4 +
Muenchener Rueckversicherung 1.5% 1.3% 0.0% 1.7 0.9 0.8 0.5 49.4
Data Processing & Outsourced Services 1.4% 1.2% 0.0% 8.8 0.3 0.3 2.4 45.2 +
Amadeus IT 1.4% 1.2% 0.0% 8.8 0.3 0.3 2.4 45.2
Application Software 4.6% 4.1% 0.0% 7.3 1.1 1.0 3.1 158.0 +
SAP 4.6% 4.1% 0.0% 7.3 1.1 1.0 3.1 158.0
Communications Equipment 1.6% 1.4% 0.3% 30.6 8.5 7.6 4.9 45.2 +
Nokia (Helsingfors) 1.6% 1.4% 0.3% 30.6 8.5 7.6 4.9 45.2
Semiconductor Equipment 3.1% 2.7% 0.0% 16.9 1.4 1.3 28.0 103.5 +
ASML Holding 3.1% 2.7% 0.0% 16.9 1.4 1.3 28.0 103.5
Semiconductors 1.0% 0.9% 0.2% 128.3 6.1 5.5 10.7 26.6 +
Infineon Technologies 1.0% 0.9% 0.2% 128.3 6.1 5.5 10.7 26.6
Integrated Telecommunication Services 3.5% 5.5% 0.8% 40.7 27.3 45.3 32.4 90.6 +
Telefonica Nacional De Espana 1.9% 1.7% 0.5% 44.2 17.7 15.7 18.1 47.3
Orange Telecom 1.5% 1.4% 0.3% 35.4 9.6 8.6 14.3 41.7
Electric Utilities 2.2% 3.9% 24.5% 1'677.6 812.2 948.4 905.5 -756.0 -
Enel SPA 2.2% 2.0% 24.5% 1'677.6 812.2 723.1 905.5 -756.0
Multi-Utilities 1.3% 1.2% 25.1% 1'995.3 833.7 742.3 634.4 -800.8 -
ENGIE 1.3% 1.2% 25.1% 1'995.3 833.7 742.3 634.4 -800.8
Total portfolio 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 232.8 3'320.9 3'221.9 4'577.2
Note that the weighting for the benchmark will not always total 100% as the stocks shown are only for those held by the portfolio.
9
Carbon Report - SEB Euroland Free of Management Fee
Carbon RankingThis is a standardized ranking of the fund based on the product'sweighted average carbon intensity using two peergroups. Oneconsisting of all other funds in the database (global percentile) andone where the fund is ranked taking the specific Lipper GlobalClassification into account (peer percentile). The ranking is based onpercentiles and ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Global Percentile
55(n=5290)
Peer Percentile
55(Lipper Global Equity Global, n=935)
The carbon footprint provides a historic snapshot of the emissions from the equity holdings of the fund. The calculations are not comprehensive and indirect emissions, e.g. from suppliers, are based on reporteddata or estimates of emissions. The metric says nothing about how the portfolio contributes to a low-carbon society. For further information about the metric, see www.sebgroup.com.
10