case about lease--summer (2)

3
8/16/2019 Case About Lease--summer (2) http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/case-about-lease-summer-2 1/3 The Cap-Short Corporation is debating whether to acquire an asset through an operating lease arrangement or to borrow funds and purchase the asset. The purchase price of the asset, $100,000, can be financed with a four-year, 1! ban" loan. #f purchased, the asset will be depreciated as three-year property with no epected sal%age at the end of its four- year life. &lternati%ely, the firm can obtain the use of the asset through two operating leases of two years each. The lease payments would be $'0,000 per year on the first lease and $',000 per year on the second lease. The firm(s ta rate is approimately ')!. *hich alternati%e should be selected based on minimi+ing the present %alue of afterta costs  Annual loan payment   Amortization Table  Year   Beginning  Balance   Annual  Payment   Annual  Interest   Payment of  Principal   Ending  Balance  1 ' )  $100,000.00 /,/'.' ,/)'. '0,). $',0. ',0. ',0. ',0. $1,000.00 11,//.0 ,)1.' ),. $0,0. ',0'0.1 ,)).) '0,).)2 $/,/'.'  ,/)'.  '0,).  02  23rincipal payment differs slightly from the amount owed because of rounding.

Upload: hassan-mosa

Post on 06-Jul-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Case About Lease--summer (2)

8/16/2019 Case About Lease--summer (2)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/case-about-lease-summer-2 1/3

The Cap-Short Corporation is debating whether to acquire an asset through an operatinglease arrangement or to borrow funds and purchase the asset. The purchase price of theasset, $100,000, can be financed with a four-year, 1! ban" loan. #f purchased, the assetwill be depreciated as three-year property with no epected sal%age at the end of its four-year life. &lternati%ely, the firm can obtain the use of the asset through two operating

leases of two years each. The lease payments would be $'0,000 per year on the firstlease and $',000 per year on the second lease. The firm(s ta rate is approimately')!. *hich alternati%e should be selected based on minimi+ing the present %alue ofafterta costs

 Annual loan payment 

 

 Amortization Table

 

Year 

 

 Beginning 

 Balance

 

 Annual 

 Payment 

 

 Annual 

 Interest 

 

 Payment of 

 Principal 

 

 Ending 

 Balance

 

1

'

)

 

$100,000.00

/,/'.'

,/)'.

'0,).

$',0.

',0.

',0.

',0.

$1,000.00

11,//.0

,)1.'

),.

$0,0.

',0'0.1

,)).)

'0,).)2

$/,/'.'

  ,/)'.

  '0,).

  02

 

23rincipal payment differs slightly from the amount owed because ofrounding.

Page 2: Case About Lease--summer (2)

8/16/2019 Case About Lease--summer (2)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/case-about-lease-summer-2 2/3

  Depreciation Schedule

 

Year 

 

 Rate of 

 Depreciation

 

ost of Asset 

 

 Annual

 Depreciation

 

1

'

)

 

.'''

.))

.1)

.0)

 

$100,000

  100,000

  100,000

  100,000

 

$'','00

)),00

1),00

,)00

 Afterta! ost of "perating #eases 

Year 

  Payment 

 Ta! Shield 

  Afterta! ost 

 

1

'

)

 

$'0,000

'0,000

',000

',000

$10,00

10,00

11,/00

11,/00

$1/,00

1/,00

',100

',100

 Aftertax Cost of Borrow-Purchase

Page 3: Case About Lease--summer (2)

8/16/2019 Case About Lease--summer (2)

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/case-about-lease-summer-2 3/3

 

Year 

 

Payment 

 

Interest 

 

Depreciation

 

Total Tax 

 Deduction

 

Tax 

 Shield 

 

Net After-

 Tax Cost 

 

1

2

3

4

 

$35,026.2735,026.27

35,026.27

35,026.27

 

$15,000.0 011,996.068,541.53

4,568.82

 

$33,300

44,500

14,800

7,400

$48,300.00

56,496.06

23,341.53

11,968.82

 

$16,422.00

19,208.66

7,936.12

4,069.40

 

$18,604.27

15,817.61

27,090.15

30,956.87

4iscount rate 5 afterta cost of debt 5 .161 - .')7 5 .0// 5 10!

 

 $et Present %alue omparison

  #easing 

  Borro&'Purchase

 Year 

 

 Afterta! ost 

of #easing 

 

 I( at 

)*+

 

 Present 

  %alue

 

 Afterta! ost of 

 Borro&'Purchase

 

 I( at 

)*+

 

 Present 

%alue

 

1

'

)

 

$1/,00

1/,00

',100

',100

./0/

.

.1

.'

 

$1,//.01,').0

1,').10

1,.'0

$,).)0

$1,0).1

1,1.1

,0/0.1

'0,/.

./0/

.

.1

.'

 

$1,/11.

1',0.'

0,')).0

1,1)'.)

$1,)).

8ased solely on the present %alue of costs, the leasing arrangement is the preferablemeans of acquiring the asset. The choice may be based on other factors, howe%er, sincethe difference in costs is not large.