case discussion and prescribing aspects

54
CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects Anshika Shah 200525TS012 1

Upload: idona-leach

Post on 02-Jan-2016

16 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects. Anshika Shah 200525TS012. Case 1. A 40 year old man presented for a routine eye examination. No specific complaints for distance or near vision. Clinical findings. UNAIDED VA: OD: 6/5, N6 @ 40 cm - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

CASE DISCUSSIONand

Prescribing aspects

Anshika Shah200525TS012

1

Page 2: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Case 1• A 40 year old man presented for a routine eye examination.

• No specific complaints for distance or near vision.

2

Page 3: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Clinical findings• UNAIDED VA:

OD: 6/5, N6 @ 40 cm

OS: 6/5, N6 @ 40 cm (habitual reading distance)

• Cover test: Distance : Ortho

Near : 4 prisms Exophoria

3

Page 4: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Clinical findings

• Retinoscopy:

OD: +0.75DS

OS: +0.75 DS

• Acc:

OD: +0.50 DS (6/5)

OS: +0.50 DS (6/5)

• ADD: OU: Plano (N6) @ 40 cm

• NRA/PRA: +1.75/ -2.00 DS

4

Page 5: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Diagnosis

Management

5

Page 6: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Treatment plan• Patient was asked to compare vision for distance and

near, with and without glasses. No significant difference in vision observed subjectively.

• Diagnosis: OU: Hyperopia• Management: No intervention required• Reasons: Exophoria for near and good

accommodative amplitudes for age

6

Page 7: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

CASE 2• 2 yr old child with the c/o suspicious less vision (parents version )

• Vision (PLT): OD: 6/18

OS:6/18

• Cycloplegic Flash: OD: +4.50 DS

• OS: +4.00 DS

• Cover Test : Ortho Distance / Near

• Management : ?

• Full cycloplegic correction

7

Page 8: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Case 3• A 6 year old school girl was referred since she failed in the school

screening. No visual complaints noticed so far.

8

Page 9: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Clinical findings• Vn (OU) 6/60, N6 @ 40 cm

• Retinoscopy:

OD: +5.25 DS/ -1.00 x 90

OS: +4.75 DS/ -0.75 x 90

• Acc:

OD: +5.25 DS/ -1.00 x 90 (6/7.5)

OS: +4.75 DS/ -0.75 x 90 (6/7.5)

• ADD: OU: Plano (N6) @ 40 cm

• NRA/PRA: +1.75/ -2.00 DS

9

Page 10: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Clinical findings• Cycloplegic Refraction:

OD: +6.75 DS/ -1.00 x 90 (6/7.5)

OS: +6.25 DS/ -0.75 x 90 (6/7.5)

• Keratometry:

OD: 43.37/ 41.75 @ 900

OS: 43.87/ 42.25 @ 900

• Post Mydriatic Test: Acc:

OD: +5.25 DS/ -1.00 x 90 (6/7.5), N6

OS: +4.75 DS/ -0.75 x 90 (6/7.5), N6  

10

Page 11: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Diagnosis

Management

11

Page 12: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Treatment plan• Diagnosis: OU: Compound Hyperopic astigmatism• Management: PMT value can be given as glasses to

ensure compliance.• Plastic lenses• Follow-up 3/12• Follow-up examination at 3 months with glasses: OU:

6/7.5, N6• CT- Ortho for distance and near• Stereo: 70 arc seconds

12

Page 13: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Case 4• A 38 year old software professional came for a routine eye

examination. He had no complaints regarding vision for

distance or near.

• He also reported that his left eye vision is always poorer than

the right eye since childhood.

• He was prescribed glasses thrice between 10 and 25 years

and he never felt comfortable with glasses and it did not

improve his vision also. He wants to know the further

management that can be done to improve his vision in the left

eye.

13

Page 14: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Clinical findings• UNAIDED VA:

OD: 6/6, N6 @ 30 cm

OS: 3/60 with ph NI, N36 @ 40 cm

• Cover test: Ortho for Distance and near

• Stereo acuity at near: 100 arc seconds

• Retinoscopy: OD: +1.00 DS

OS: +6.75 DS/ -3.00 x 30

• Acc: OD: +1.00 DS (6/5, N6)

OS: +6.75 DS/ -3.00 x 30 (6/60, N12 at 20 cm) with ph NI

14

Page 15: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Diagnosis

Management

15

Page 16: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Treatment plan• Diagnosis: • OD: Hyperopia OS: Compound hyperopic astigmatism • Anisometropia • OS: Refractive amblyopia• Management:• Polycarbonate protective glasses in a safety frame• Prescribe: OD: +1.00 DS; OS: +1.00 DS (Balance

lens)• Patient explained about the condition and the need to

protect his spare eye.

16

Page 17: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Case 5• A 39 year old school teacher reported for an annual eye

examination and expressed an interest for contact lenses. She was

comfortable with her old glasses.

17

Page 18: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Clinical findings

• Visual acuity with glasses:

OD: 6/6-4, N6 @ 35 cm

OS: 6/6-3, N6 @ 35 cm

OU: 6/6, N6 @ 30 cm.

• Glass prescription: OD: -6.00 DS

OS:-6.50 DS

• Cover test (With glasses): Ortho for distance and 4 prisms

Exophoria for near.

18

Page 19: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Clinical findings• Retinoscopy:

OD: -6.75 DS

OS:-7.00 DS

• Acceptance:

OD:-6.50 DS (6/5), N6 @ 40 cm

OS:-7.00 DS(6/5), N6 @ 40 cm

• NFV: D: X/8/4 N: 16/24/18

• PFV: D: 12/24/15 N: 28/32/14

• NRA/PRA: +2.25/-1.00

19

Page 20: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Diagnosis

Management

20

Page 21: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Treatment Plan• Diagnosis: High myopia• Approaching presbyopia

• Discussion:• Low PRA can be attributed to approaching presbyopia.

• The new correction for distance can cause near vision difficulties. Binocularly patient does not have any complaints for distance or reading with old glasses.

21

Page 22: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

• The patient’s fusional ranges are normal and the blur values for PFV are more than twice the Phoria.

• Hence the need for increasing the minus for distance is not necessitated.

• Near PFV is according to Morgan’s normal values.

• Contact lenses might increase the accommodative demand of the visual system for reading.

• Patient has to be educated about this and add for reading can be prescribed over the CL if required.

22

Page 23: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Case 6• A 9 year old school going girl had been wearing glasses since past

3 years.

• No complaints regarding vision with glasses for distance and near.

• But she complained of discomfort while reading for more than 20

minutes. Mother had noticed occasional deviation of the eye

inwards while concentrating at near.

23

Page 24: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Clinical findings

• UNAIDED VA:

OD: 6/12, N8 @ 40 cm

OS: 6/15, N8 @ 40 cm

• Cover test: Distance- 10 prisms Esophoria

• Near - 4 prisms Esophoria

• Stereo acuity at near: 100 arc seconds

24

Page 25: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Clinical findings• Visual acuity (with glasses): OU: 6/6, N6 @ 30 cm

• Glass prescription: OU: +5.00 DS

• Cover test with glasses: Dist: Ortho.

Near: 15 prisms Esotropia

• Stereo: 140 arc seconds

• Retinoscopy:

OD: +5.00 DS

OS: +5.00 DS

• Acc: Same as old glasses (OU) (6/6, N6)

• Cycloplegic Refraction: 0U:+5.00 DS

25

Page 26: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Diagnosis

Management

26

Page 27: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Treatment Plan• Diagnosis: OU: Hyperopia with Accommodative

Esotropia• Management: • Cover test for near repeated with +2.00 DS: Ortho for

near:• With +2.50 DS: Exophoria• Impression: Accommodative Esotropia with high AC/A

Ratio

27

Page 28: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

• Advice: Plastic lenses/ Polycarbonate executive bifocal lenses with the segment line at mid – pupil to ensure that the patient sees through the addition for near works.

• Need for bifocals and full time wear of the glasses explained to the parents.

• Follow-up 3/12• Follow-up examination at 3 months with glasses: OU:

6/6, N6• CT- Ortho for distance and near• Stereo: 70 arc seconds

• A review with the bifocal glasses should always be advised to avoid any overcorrection in the addition leading to consecutive deviations.

28

Page 29: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Case 7• 12 year old with aversion for doing reading but love to watch TV

with unaided Vision of 6/6; N6 in both eyes

• Flash : OU : +1.50 DS (6/6) N6

• Ortho – Distance and Near

• Vergence : Normal

• Management : ?

• Prescribe only for reading and near work.

29

Page 30: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Case 8• A 28 year old woman came with complaints of driving difficulty at

night. No other specific complaints.

30

Page 31: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Clinical findings

• UNAIDED VA:

OD: 6/7.5, N6 @ 30 cm

OS: 6/60 with ph NI, N6 @ 30 cm

• Cover test: 3 prisms Exophoria for Distance and 4 prisms Exophoria

for near

• Stereo acuity at near: 60 arc seconds

31

Page 32: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Clinical findings• Retinoscopy:

OD: +0.25 DS/ -1.00 x 175

OS: -1.50 DS/-1.00 X 180

• Acc:

OD: +0.25 DS/-0.50 X 180 (6/5, N6)

OS: -2.00 DS/ -0.50 x 180 (6/5, N6)

• Even though visual acuity ahs improved with correction, patient does not

want glasses.

 

32

Page 33: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Diagnosis

Management

33

Page 34: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Treatment Plan• Diagnosis:• Anisometropia with mixed astigmatism (OD) • Compound myopic astigmatism (OS)• Antimetropia

• Management:• Contact lenses to reduce anisekonia 

34

Page 35: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Case 9• A 10 year old boy was brought with the complaint of left eye drifting

outwards. Mother felt that the problem is getting worse. There were

no other specific complaints.

35

Page 36: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Clinical findings• UNAIDED VA:

OD: 6/9, N6 @ 30 cm

OS: 6/9, N6 @ 30 cm

• Cover test: 20 prisms intermittent left Exotropia for Distance and 5

prisms Exophoria for near

• Stereo acuity at near: 60 arc seconds

• Calculated AC/A Ratio: 12/1

• NPC: 7 cm

 

36

Page 37: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Clinical findings

• For near: NFV: 10/16/12 PFV: X/15/10

• Retinoscopy:

OD: +0.00 DS/ -1.50 x 180

OS: -0.50 DS/-0.50 X 180

• Acc:

OD: +0.00 DS/ -1.50 x 180 (6/5, N6)

OS: -0.50 DS/-0.50 X 180 (6/5, N6)

37

Page 38: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Diagnosis

Management

38

Page 39: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Treatment Plan• Diagnosis:• Low myopia (OS) with Astigmatism (OU) • Divergence Excess

• Management:• Full correction of myopia and astigmatism• Review with glasses• Vision therapy

39

Page 40: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Case 10• A 9 year old school girl complained of distance blur with the present

glasses. She has been wearing glasses for the past 1 year. She

reads extensively.

40

Page 41: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Clinical findings• Visual acuity (with glasses):

OD: 6/9, N6 @ 40 cm

OS: 6/12, N6 @ 40 cm.

• Glass Prescription:

OD: -2.25/ -0.25 X 80

OS: -2.00/-0.25 X 95

• Phoria measurements: Ortho for Distance and 5 prisms Esophoria

for near

41

Page 42: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Clinical findings

• Stereo acuity at near: 100 arc seconds

• Retinoscopy:

OD: -3.00 DS/-0.25 x 90

OS: -3.00 DS/-0.25 x 90

• Acc:

OD: -3.00 DS/-0.25 x 80 (6/5, N6)

OS: -3.00 DS/-0.25 x 100 (6/5, N6)

42

Page 43: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Clinical findings• Gradient AC / A Ratio: 6/1

• PFV: D: 10/20/10 N: 24/32/15

• NFV: D: X/8/3 N: 6/18/4

• NPC: 3 cm

• Amplitude of accommodation: 15.00 D

43

Page 44: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Diagnosis

Management

44

Page 45: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Treatment Plan• Patient felt that the distance vision is better with the

new glasses but felt that the near vision is better with the old glasses.

• DIAGNOSIS:• Increase in myopia• Convergence Excess• Low Base-in fusional vergence and low PRA at near  

45

Page 46: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

• Management:• Add of +1.00 DS can be prescribed to shift the near Phoria

range into the normal range.• Explained the need for bifocals and increasing myopia.

Option of Contact lenses for Distance and reading glasses over the lenses suggested.

• Review with bifocal glasses after 2 weeks:• Patient felt very comfortable for reading.• Cover test: Ortho for distance and near with bifocals.

• A plus add is the treatment of choice for convergence excess. Any latent Hyperopia should be identified using cycloplegic refraction and should be prescribed.

46

Page 47: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Thank you

47

Page 48: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Hyperopia Guidelines• Upto 6 yrs

• 6 -20 yrs

• No compensation (2 -

3D)

• Except Strabismus,

suppression or poor

school performance

• No compensation

• Except near

asthenopia or ↓ Vn

• Liberal cut Plus Cx

Page 49: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Hyperopia Guidelines

• 20 yrs and above • Compensation for

complaints +

Moderate Plus cut

distance + full

compensation for

near

Page 50: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Hyperopia Guidelines

• Low Hyperopia + Symptom +/- eso: Full to

Partial correction – age dependent

• High Hyperopia + ↓ Vn - Cx

• Initial Mx for Hyperopia + eso – full cyclo.

Cx

• Reduction of Cx – School going children and

adults

Page 51: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Myopia Guidelines• Cycloplegic refractions are mandatory-

infants ,esotropic children , high Myopes

• Prescribe full amount of refractive error

including cylinder. Young will tolerate well

• Intentional undercx of a myopia esotropic to

decrease angle of deviation is rarely tolerated

• < 30 yrs full cx; > 30 yrs go in steps

Page 52: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Astigmatism

• Low with the rule + asymptomatic: No Cx

• Low with the rule + symptomatic : Cx

• Low against the rule : Cx

• High with the Rule : Cx

• Oblique astigmatism + symptomatic: Cx

• High Spherical + low astigmatism : Based on

Vision clarity

• > 2.50 D : Amblyopia

Page 53: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Presbyopia Guidelines▫Based on Amplitude of Accommodation

▫½ or 1/3rd AA reserve

▫Exophoria with add : plan for prism if less PFV

Page 54: CASE DISCUSSION and Prescribing aspects

Prism Prescribing Guidelines• Morgan’s Criterion : Based on Morgan’s Normative

Values

• Clinical Wisdom : 1/3rd of measured angle of deviation

• Sheard’s Criteria: 2/3(Phoria) – 1/3(Fusional

vergence) - eso look BI ; exo look BO

eg : 6 prism exo, BO to blur 6 prism Amount of prism

will be 2 prism BI ( 1 prism each eye)

• Percival Criteria : 1/3( greater limit of BI or BO

range) – 2/3(lesser limit of BI or BO range)