case innovation at retailers vsn 2.1e

Upload: ramy555

Post on 07-Apr-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/6/2019 Case Innovation at Retailers Vsn 2.1E

    1/21

    1

    Entrepreneurial Innovation at Retail Stores:

    Case Apple iPhone for the City(with Simulation Instructions)

    We need to expand our product line. There are quite a few clever boys in the class

    for the final game of cell phones. Apple, Google and Nokia from the West, and

    Samsung from the East are stealing the show. We should not miss the show. In fact

    we should al so become active supporters of one or the other clever guy. These

    words were part of the preparation Retail Manager Appu had just made for the

    meeting of the next morning.

    1. Introduction

    The manager Appu leads a major retail store in the city, which

    is specialized in audio and video electronic goods, and now

    looks forward to expanding his business with cell phones.

    Considering the high market position of Apple iPhone in the

    USA and outside, he was fancying the idea of adding this

    specific product line. There already existed a number of stores

    for cell phones in the city, yet there was no major store for

    iPhone. Thus the manager liked to expand the stores existing

    competitive position further by including the new product

    line. As to how this has to be done was a challenge to Appu.

    Appu had heard much about Apple Stores in the USA. He was

    wondering whether his concern to capture the Apple iPhone

    market was similar in any way to that of Apple Stores. Some

    general background to the product and the stores could be

    found, he thought. With these thoughts in his mind, he started

    to look forward for paving the way for a product range as

    advanced as that of Apple iPhone; see Figure 1.Figure 1Dedicated fans Apple iPhone

    Apple iPhone TV Ad iPod& iTunes

    (This and other Hyperlinks

    may have to be Edited. Thenyou have to download video

    and picture files using

    separately supplied

    information from

    [email protected])

    http://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/iPod%20&%20iTunes.flvhttp://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/iPod%20&%20iTunes.flvhttp://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/iPod%20&%20iTunes.flvhttp://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/iPod%20&%20iTunes.flvhttp://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/iPod%20&%20iTunes.flvhttp://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/iPod%20&%20iTunes.flvhttp://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/iPod%20&%20iTunes.flvhttp://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/iPod%20&%20iTunes.flvhttp://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/iPod%20&%20iTunes.flvhttp://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/iPod%20&%20iTunes.flvmailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/iPod%20&%20iTunes.flvhttp://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/iPod%20&%20iTunes.flvhttp://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/iPod%20&%20iTunes.flvhttp://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/iPod%20&%20iTunes.flv
  • 8/6/2019 Case Innovation at Retailers Vsn 2.1E

    2/21

    2

    A number of competitive products in the offer, some already

    delivered through other shops in the city, however, made the

    choice even more complex. For the sake of comparison the

    manager asked one of his sales staff to make a brief survey

    especially of the new generation of smart phones. The

    survey revealed that the idea of taking up Apple iPhone

    need not be the obvious and the best. The competitors

    range of comparable products is broad as listed in Figure 2.

    Whether he could develop some views on the product for

    Many Smart phones in themarket

    iPhone Competitors

    Competitors iPhone

    the future, which was not wholly in his hands, was a

    separate issue. However major principles behind the success

    of this product in the USA could be explored. Some of these

    principles were visible in the Business Case he had comeacross in one of the meetings of the local Chamber of

    Commerce. It was then told that the case Apples products

    was an interesting one to discover scopes for improvement

    in marketing and sales, or innovation. It was apparent also

    for his business: see Apple products in Figure 3 and Apple

    Store in Exhibit 1.

    Figure 2Competitors productsagainst Apple iPhone

    Figure 3A range of products atApple Store

    http://images.businessweek.com/ss/09/10/1028_iphone_latest_challengers/index.htmhttp://images.businessweek.com/ss/09/10/1028_iphone_latest_challengers/index.htmhttp://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/Competitors%20iPhone.flvhttp://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/Competitors%20iPhone.flvhttp://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/Competitors%20iPhone.flvhttp://images.businessweek.com/ss/09/10/1028_iphone_latest_challengers/index.htm
  • 8/6/2019 Case Innovation at Retailers Vsn 2.1E

    3/21

    3

    Apple stores

    As an extension of its brand experience, Apple operates retail stores in the United States, Canada,

    Japan, and the United Kingdom. The stores carry most of Apples products as well as many third-party

    products and offer on-site support and repair for Apple hardware and software. The first stores were

    opened in May 2001 and were designed for two purposes: to stem the tides of Apples declining share

    of the computer market and to counter a poor record of marketing Apple products by third-party retail

    outlets. The design of stores taken into account:

    1. Creating an experience. This is accomplished through the striking glass staircase, store design,

    and attention to the line of sight so that it feels more like walking into a hands-on museum

    than walking into a retail store.

    2. Honoring context. The store is organized by the context in which people use the products. With

    digital cameras, photo printers, and Apples iPhoto software set up together, customers can

    envision using these products in their own lives. By acknowledging the context in the design of

    the store, Apple encourages its customers to dream about possibilities.

    3. Prioritizing its messages. The store is visually spare with product packages kept below eye

    level, and relatively few products on display. The store focuses on a handful of important

    messages.

    4. Instituting consistency. The Apple personality comes through every time the customer

    encounters the brand, whether on television, in print or outdoor advertising, or through

    interacting with one of Apples products. The Apple stores are no different, and Apple is able to

    project that personality across all these channels by maintaining rigorous consistency of

    design.

    5. Designing for change. The front window displays are rigged using simple flat panels mounted

    on tracks and cables. The system allows the displays to be changed quickly and easily while still

    allowing a diverse range of possibilities for grabbing the attention of passersby.

    6. Not forgetting the human element. The people who staff the store form an integral part of the

    overall experience. Apple store employees dont look like run-of-the-mill retail workers.

    Instead of name tags, they have business cards. And they all carry iPods on their belts, creating

    the impression that they dont just work for Apple they live the lifestyle Apple is selling to

    customers. Apples retail workers are brand emissaries.

    Apple - iPhone 4 - TV Ad -App Store

    Which market to serve and how?

    Thanks to the involvement of a specialist on innovation, the

    new business could now be scrutinised in only two

    workshops. The workshops need be attended by a few persons

    including the retail manager himself. All persons were

    considered responsible for taking a decision on the needed

    innovation beyond the product to marketing and sales. The

    assignment of the workshop was thus specified.

    AssignmentIdentify the most promisingmarket segment(s) for the newApple iPhone product line.Make a list of customer valuepropositions and how we canposition this product line inthat market.

    Exhibit 1Case Apple Stores and

    product exhibits

    http://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/App%20Store.flvhttp://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/App%20Store.flvhttp://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/App%20Store.flvhttp://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/App%20Store.flvhttp://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/App%20Store.flvhttp://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/App%20Store.flvhttp://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/App%20Store.flvhttp://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/App%20Store.flv
  • 8/6/2019 Case Innovation at Retailers Vsn 2.1E

    4/21

    4

    Collaboration with INPAQT expert

    In order to ensure that the participants stood open to signals

    from outside and that the internal discussions did not go on

    for ever, the external advisor was asked to take the lead. The

    advisor belonged to a reputed consultancy firm, INPAQT of

    the Netherlands, which claims to possess the most advanced

    methods, software tools and simulations for innovating

    businesses. Though the advisor should facilitate the

    workshops, active participation by the participants would

    yield the most suitable strategy for the store.

    In the discussion that took place between the team and the

    advisor prior to the first workshop, the following was agreed

    upon as stated by the advisor.

    The approach

    Customer value propositionsFirstly relevant stakeholders in the business area would be

    listed, and subsequently a stakeholder analysis will be carried

    out in the workshop. After that, the most promising market

    segment(s) would be selected. It was quite essential to know

    which customer groups to target; Figure 4.

    1Program of demands (POD)

    consists of a prioritized list of

    product attributes, formulated bycustomers and retailers. Product or

    service attributes may refer to:

    1. Functionalities;

    2. Interface;

    3. Support functions;

    4. Costs such as price and relatedmaintenance;

    5. Life span; and

    6. Availability and accessibility.

    They encompass the whole product

    including the hardware, software,

    services, package, and price.

    UNLEASHING YOUR POWER TO INNOVATE!www.inpaqt.com

    The selected market segments are expected to perceive a

    definite set of priorities, also called customer value

    propositions. These need to be defined and subsequently

    translated into a program of demands1

    (POD). This POD will

    consist of various properties, or attributes, of the products or

    services, which should fulfil the proposed values. The following

    step of POD was to find out suitable functions that support the

    identified values through the related attributes as shown in

    Figure 5. By taking this step we can get insight as to which

    functions create most value for the customers and with which

    we can differentiate ourselves from the competitors. Such

    functions are critical to the proposed business, thus they need to

    be exploited through undertaking appropriate innovationactivities.

    Figure 4Customers values could be

    diverse depending ondemography, culture,economical and socialstatus

    The 20 Countries With theHighest Per Capita Cell-PhoneUse

    http://www.inpaqt.com/http://www.inpaqt.com/http://images.businessweek.com/slideshows/20110213/the-20-countries-with-the-highest-per-capita-cell-phone-use/http://images.businessweek.com/slideshows/20110213/the-20-countries-with-the-highest-per-capita-cell-phone-use/http://images.businessweek.com/slideshows/20110213/the-20-countries-with-the-highest-per-capita-cell-phone-use/http://images.businessweek.com/slideshows/20110213/the-20-countries-with-the-highest-per-capita-cell-phone-use/http://images.businessweek.com/slideshows/20110213/the-20-countries-with-the-highest-per-capita-cell-phone-use/http://images.businessweek.com/slideshows/20110213/the-20-countries-with-the-highest-per-capita-cell-phone-use/http://images.businessweek.com/slideshows/20110213/the-20-countries-with-the-highest-per-capita-cell-phone-use/http://www.inpaqt.com/
  • 8/6/2019 Case Innovation at Retailers Vsn 2.1E

    5/21

    5

    1Copyright belongs to INPAQT

    Innovation Management Suite

    Identifying requirements of innovationThe critical functions thus identified can be met with

    specific functional requirements that should also be

    measurable. After identifying them, they will have to be

    developed, if required. In other words, we will invest on our

    innovation efforts with appropriate yardsticks. The others,

    less value generating requirements, can be filled in as much

    as possible with existing standard solutions, thus calling for

    no additional investments of our resources. Alternatively,they can be outsourced. These are termed as general

    requirements. Also any additional requirements of attributes

    that are not fully covered by functions can be included in

    this category. This choice underlines the most "value for

    money". The sequential process of the simulation is

    schematically shown in Figure 5.

    Finally this innovative approach should help us enhance

    our market position when we undertake the sale of the new

    product Apple iPhone Next. We will do this by analysing

    whether the new customer values support our corporate

    values, and the corporate image.

    Business caseAfter the workshops we hope to be in a position to compile

    all needed inputs for presenting the product, and the

    supporting service, which should meet all customer

    requirements and needs. Finally, the resulting business

    concept should bring clarity to our proposed business

    expansion. Throughout this innovation journey the tools of

    the Innovation Management Suite (IMS)1

    software of

    INPAQT will be used since they have proved very effectivein similar approaches to building new businesses.

    Figure 5Schematic representation oftransferring customer values toneeded action requirements

    Customergroups

    Attributes

    Customersvalues

    Functions

    General

    requirements

    Functional

    requirements

    Customergroups

    Attributes

    Customersvalues

    Functions

    General

    requirements

    Functional

    requirements

  • 8/6/2019 Case Innovation at Retailers Vsn 2.1E

    6/21

    6

    Workshop 1

    2. Business Concept

    Stakeholders analysis

    The first workshop started with a short briefing of all

    participants of the innovation team that consisted of:

    1. The current retail manager, Appu, and his assistant2. The sales manager; he is also the head of the

    marketing department

    3. The major shareholder4. The financial controller

    The scope of the project was projected by the retail manager

    Appu. It lasted no longer than 5 minutes. Then thebrainstorming session began.

    Customer target groups

    In about 10 minutes after the start of the session, the main

    stakeholders were identified. There was some discussion

    about how best to define the customers. By definition, the

    customer is essential. Without the customer, there is no

    market and therefore no revenues from the business. Of the

    various customer groups, however, teenagers and hobbyists

    appeared the most attractive customers to focus on. Business

    people and globetrotters scored the next highest. Theranking was done using a score of 5 as essential and 1 as

    marginal. After some discussion among the participants, it

    was decided to make value maps for the teenagers and the

    business people as two major customer groups. In addition,

    it was soon also clear that the new product must be

    interesting enough for the retailer to sell. Therefore the

    retailers also get the score 5, because when they are not

    interested in promoting the product nothing will be sold.

    The diagram thus drawn using the product and essential

    stakeholders is shown in Figure 6.

    Figure 6The product and majorstakeholders

  • 8/6/2019 Case Innovation at Retailers Vsn 2.1E

    7/21

    7

    Figure 7Various stakeholdersincluding customers

    Creating Stakeholders diagram

    There are yet more important stakeholders whose interests

    count, though those stakeholders need not be included for

    decision making. Their interests, however, will reflect in the

    form of their value identity for the proposed innovation. Thestakeholders have already been identified and shown in

    Figure 7. While ranking the importance of various

    stakeholders a semi-quantitative method was used using

    every ones gut feeling.

    Exercise 1: Hands-on practice and access to simulationsFigure 6 is a starting diagram for the complete simulation. In order to get familiar with the

    simulation, you may start with a hands-on practice.

    A brief introduction to the Demo Case can be watched through the link below. If required,

    make changes using Edit Hyperlink (For better video quality look at List of Video clips)

    LoginIn order to do the simulation, first you have to login into the e-learning module. You have been

    supplied with login codes and access link to the module. In case you have any difficulty, you

    may follow the instructions provided in de tutorial below. If required, make changes using

    Edit Hyperlink

    Access to various sectionsSubsequently access the Assignment and read through various sections. There are simulations

    in Demo form as well as an independent simulation for your own project. Open up those

    simulations to discover that the former has been partly worked out and left for you to completeit. The latter is completely empty for the simulation of your own project.

    For accessing various sections, the following tutorial can be helpful:

    1Fre uentl asked uestions Lo in roblems

    Part 0_Introduction brief1

    2Fre uentl asked uestions_Read-onl

    http://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/2Frequently%20asked%20questions_%20Read%20only.mp4http://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/Part%200_Introduction%20brief1.mp4http://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/1Frequently%20asked%20questions_Login%20problems.mp4
  • 8/6/2019 Case Innovation at Retailers Vsn 2.1E

    8/21

    8

    Exercise 2: Hands-on practice - Draw diagram view of stakeholders

    You are required to add in the Demo version that you have accessed, the stakeholders shown in

    Figure 3. Though they are already identified and shown in Figure 3, you are required to

    practice by clicking on the stakeholder icon ( ) and placing it on the diagram, drawing the

    arrow and giving the score. You may place a different score than that mentioned in Figure 3, ifyou have an argument for that. Give the link by using Edit Hyperlink

    In order to do this, go to Demo Tool: Apple iPhone Next and then Stakeholder analysis

    Frequently Asked Questions

    While drawing diagram, you may find the following tutorials handy. You may need to give

    the link by using Edit Hyperlink

    Customer value map

    In order to make a customer value map the relevant values

    must first be listed. Basically there are 4 classes of values,

    namely:

    1. Psychological values, such as pleasure, and ease of use

    2. Economic values, such as low cost

    3. Social values, such as image and status4. Environmental and biological values, such as health and

    safety.

    Soon the team identified a number of values. An intense

    discussion took place, however, about one specific value,

    namely design. Some said that this is a value which

    provides psychological well-being. The others argued that

    this is not a value, but a reflection upon psychological

    well- being such as aesthetic. Design is something that

    belongs to the product, thus a product attribute. There

    was no consensus yet; thus it was concluded to keep it asit is.

    Brand image, services and product choice were

    identified as superior values. These values are displayed in

    Figure 8 ( icons). Brand image was perceived more

    important for teenagers than for business persons. Thus

    using again the scale of 5 (5 major and 1 for minor

    importance) the former was scored with 5 and 3

    respectively. Services however, is not so important for a

    teenager in comparison with a business person, thus 3 and

    5 respectively. Similarly product choice scored 2 and 4.

    DefinitionValue: The value of any product isthe outcome of its ability to meet acustomers priorities.

    Part 1 Pro ect customer stakeholder identification

    3Frequently asked questions_Delete elements

    4Frequently asked questions_Draw arrow

    http://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/4Frequently%20asked%20questions_Draw%20arrow.mp4http://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/3Frequently%20asked%20questions_Delete%20elements.mp4http://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/Part%201_Project,%20customer,%20stakeholder%20identification.mp4
  • 8/6/2019 Case Innovation at Retailers Vsn 2.1E

    9/21

    9

    Figure 8Diagram view of sample mind-mapping of target customer

    groups, their values ( ) andattributes ( )

    Then the team proceeded to determine the product

    properties in the tongue of the customer. They are

    considered also as criteria that buyers use for deciding

    which of the products offers the most value to them. A

    buyer gives due consideration to these product related

    attributes in his judgement as to whether the product

    complies with his wishes.

    Major product attributes in our Case, for example, are

    wide choice of applications and reliability ( icons).In addition to the direct relationship between an attribute

    and a value, now it is seen that cross relationships with other

    values also exist as shown in Figure 8. Reliability is a

    strong property of services. Design was found to

    contribute much to the brand image. Thus it is now

    concluded that design indeed is an attribute. The team

    started with a discussion whether these attributes can be

    measured, in accordance with scoring and ranking.

    As the team proceeded with an enthusiastic contribution

    by everyone, at a given moment, the screen was filled with a

    number of values and attributes. Moreover, nobody was anylonger able to add any important new values and attributes

    to the map. Also the map had become already complex.

    Only a limited set of complex relationships and their scores

    are shown in Figure 9. Taking every combination in turn

    also the scores between all values and all attributes were

    refined. By this process everyone was forced to look at the

    product from the customers perspective. It was noted that

    customer groups may differ in their scores to the values, but

    the type of attributes related to the different values, and their

    scores remained the same.

    DefinitionAttribute: A product attributeis the element with which thecustomer describes productquality.

  • 8/6/2019 Case Innovation at Retailers Vsn 2.1E

    10/21

    10

    Exercise 3: Add more values and attributesPlace these additional values, attributes and their scores using Demo Tool. Your learning

    experience will be high if you add one or two new values and attributes, and make some

    changes in the existing scores.

    In order to do this, go to Demo Tool: Apple iPhone Next and then Value mappingbasic. You can proceed with placing new values and attributes, connecting those for showing

    their relationship and then ranking them with scores. Name the diagram, for example, Value

    mapping basic 1. Brief instruction films are provided. You may need to give the link by using Edit

    Hyperlink

    Figure 9Diagram view of nearlycomplete mind-mapping oftarget customer groups

    The customer value matrix

    The team decided to convert the value map into a so-called

    value matrix. The value matrix can be seen as an alternate

    presentation of the value map. In fact all scores get

    transferred from the diagram view to the matrix view. This

    is done firstly by selecting all elements on the screen: the

    product, customer groups, values and their attributes. By

    clicking Create Matrix in the menu balk, a dialogue box

    appeared. The model Value Proposition was chosen for the

    matrix view, and a name is given: for example, Valueproposition basic as shown in Figure 10.

    Part 2_Value identification

    Part 3_Attribute identification

    http://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/Part%203_Attribute%20identification.mp4http://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/Part%202_Value%20identification.mp4
  • 8/6/2019 Case Innovation at Retailers Vsn 2.1E

    11/21

    11

    Figure 10Matrix view of sample valuesand their attributes

    Exercise 4: Create Value Proposition MatrixTransfer the diagram to the Value proposition matrix using Demo Tool. You can use the data

    already supplied in the Demo Case.

    In the existing matrix Value proposition basic, the additions that you just made under

    Exercise 1, are not implemented yet. You can do this implementation by clicking Matrix on the

    menu balk, selecting Organize view ..., and clicking the new values and attributes that youhave just added.

    Name the matrix, for example, Value proposition basic 1.

    A brief instruction film isprovided. You may need to give the link by using Edit Hyperlink

    Simulation for prioritizing values and attributes

    The attributes are positioned at the top in the first row. Below the identified customer groupsthe corresponding scores for the identified values are seen. Any needed value or attribute can be

    added also at this stage by simply clicking on the corresponding icons. The value proposition

    matrix of the nearly complete analysis using the diagram view of Figure 9 has been shown in

    Figure 11. All values are now in the first column on the left.

    Figure 11Customer valueproposition attributematrix

    Part 4_Convert BM in Value Matrix

    http://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/Part%204_Convert%20BM%20in%20Value%20Matrix.mp4
  • 8/6/2019 Case Innovation at Retailers Vsn 2.1E

    12/21

    12

    With the set scores in the matrix, it is easy to find out the importance of each attribute for value

    creation. We can calculate the attribute importance on value creation for the individual

    customer groups. Then we click on the icon and select each customer group separately. Forthis analysis Positive Attribute Importance was chosen, and Negative Attribute Importance

    was deleted. Also the Overall Attribute Importance that is normalized and expressed on a

    scale of 10 was subsequently calculated. This is done by clicking the icon . With this we

    combine the value creation potential of the attributes for both customer groups.The relative overall importance of the attribute design is the topper. Only next comes high

    product value and all other attributes even less important.

    Obviously these results are the outcome of the teams own analysis. It is based on the

    experience and intuition of the team members. One may call this category of analysis a GIGO

    system, meaning Garbage In,Garbage Out or "Rubbish in, Rubbish out system. This may,

    however, be biased. In order to make it realistic, it may have to be validated by market

    research. It is decided to validate the results later in a small survey. The team decided to do this

    using the companys other retail outlets. For the present, the team considered this initial

    estimate as tentative.

    The new product against other products

    After calculating the relative importance of the product attributes, the team wanted to score

    similar products of major competitors. The scores range between 5 (perfect) and 1 (marginal).

    Two major competitive products were identified: Smart phones and the relatively new Google

    phone. In addition to these competitive scores, the team wanted to score the old product of

    Apple iPhone as well. This product was noticed better than those of the competitors. However

    in a high demanding market, a better product and better marketing and sales is not a luxury any

    more. Thus the new generation iPhone was identified, and how it should be placed in the

    market was scored in the last row. On some attributes, improvements were identified as

    marginally or absolutely necessary. And on the other attributes no improvements were marked

    as necessary. Taking up these attributes any further for improvement would require resourcesthat are far too scarce and costs far too high.

    Exercise 5: Make a proposal of prioritized attributesWorkout on the sample matrix view Overall attribute importance. Fill in the competitorsdata for attributes. Make your own judgement for prioritizing attributes of the new proposed

    product Apple iPhone. Next, obtain Product value realization of all products in the analysis.Use the Demo Tool for this exercise. The mode of simulation is explained in the video clip

    below. You may need to give the link by using Edit Hyperlink

    Part 5 1 Com etitive values and attributes

    Exercise 6: Evaluate the resulting effects on customer valuesSimulate resulting customer values as affected by prioritizing the attributes using the Demo

    Tool. The mode of simulation is explained in the video clip below. You may need to give the link

    by using Edit Hyperlink

    These results can be used for the report as explained in the video clip below.

    Part 5_2_Com etitive values and attributes

    Part 6 Re ort rioritizin values

    http://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/Part%206_Report%20prioritizing%20values.mp4http://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/Part%205_2_Competitive%20values%20and%20attributes.mp4http://h/INPAQT,%202011,%20Case%20Innovation%20at%20Retailers/Videos/Part%205_1_Competitive%20values%20and%20attributes.mp4
  • 8/6/2019 Case Innovation at Retailers Vsn 2.1E

    13/21

    13

    The attributes have been scored and competitive positioning of various similar products being

    done, the advisor exposed to the team also the values that are relatively hard to measure.

    There is an indirect approach for establishing the rather abstract and complex perceptions of

    customer values. The advisor did this exposure by clicking the blue icon for each existing

    product. Also the future proposed iPhone is shown to impact in its brand image. Product

    choice is quite important, at least against market giants such as Smart phones. Surprisingly,however, price scores low. There was a long discussion whether high product value is an

    important attribute for creating values such as price and experiences. In the tradition of

    positioning the product at the high end, this may not be strange at all. However it was

    concluded that specifically for Apple product line the former price has little effect. I t was

    agreed that experiences refer to far too emotional features, and not contributed by an

    economically defined attribute high product value.

    Lastly, the team was curious to know whether it was possible to create one total score of

    the value creating potential of the new product versus the old product. It was explained that this

    could be done by clicking on the icon named Product Concept Score. This calculates the

    total value creating score for the present product and the new product concept (see Figure 11).

    This score was calculated for both teenagers and business people. In both cases the score ofthe proposed product concept was higher than the score of the present product. The team

    concluded that this was an easy way to generate more concepts and see which of the concepts

    seemed to be the best for both targeted customer groups.

    Conclusions on customer value propositions and their

    attributes

    Everybody realized that these results were based upon the

    present knowledge, experience and gut feeling of the team.

    One question, however, came up after the above analysis.Why is there concern to place a new product and a new sales

    and marketing approach with special attention on services?

    In a dynamic market with rather short product life cycles it is

    better to be the leader, both with the product and also at retail

    stores. The product is designed, developed and supplied by

    major manufacturers of the electronic industry. It is the

    responsibility of the retail stores to position the product in the

    market with supporting services. A chain-store such as Apple

    Stores does it systematically at its 300 and odd stores in the

    USA. In the upcoming Indian market, the role of an

    individual major store in the city is not entirely negligible in

    this regard; the contribution by services can be substantial. In

    addition, telecom service providers have a strong influence in

    the market, for contributing to the required services.

    Then the team determined the scores for the new product

    which the retailer would wish and thus can recommend to the

    manufacturer to develop at least for the upcoming Indian

    market. In general, the product should be as good as the

    competitors (the qualifiers) and on a few attributes it must

    have a higher score (the differentiators or USPs). The higher

    scores are preferentially given to those attributes that matterhigh to the customer. It was decided to give priority to high

    product value for augmenting services.

  • 8/6/2019 Case Innovation at Retailers Vsn 2.1E

    14/21

    14

    Workshop 2

    2.2. Functions and their requirementsThe second workshop started with making an inventory of

    functions necessary to realize the attributes. Wherever

    possible the functions were described with a verb and anoun. With this, each function is defined more precisely in

    the description box; see Figure 12.

    DefinitionFunction: A functionrepresents an action to be

    performed by athing, orthe purpose of an activity;a function is convenientlyexpressed in a verb-nouncombination.

    Figure 12Function description indetail

    Defining functions in this way prevents us from

    immediately start thinking in terms of solutions. In general,by defining the functions with a verb and a noun we are

    stimulated to look for innovative solutions for those

    functions. For example, Range of application functionalities

    need to be provided; thus Provide a range of application

    functionalities. This could facilitate searching for suitable

    application, and giving choice of performance criteria such as

    price, language, network choice, etc. This statement, provide

    a range of application functionalities, would contribute to

    fulfilling the attribute. Accordingly the team defined various

    functions to fulfil the product attributes as shown in Figure

    13. In the figure, however, the verbs have not been typed for

    compactness.

    Defining values, attributes and functions more precisely

    was important for using the matrices later; it was more so

    especially for the participants with limited technical

    background. With this approach they became more involved

    and committed to the whole innovation process. Scoring the

    contributions of the functions to the attributes between 5 and

    1 was done as before.

  • 8/6/2019 Case Innovation at Retailers Vsn 2.1E

    15/21

    15

    Figure 13Functions for fulfillingproduct attributes

    Exercise 7: Add more functions in the diagram viewExpand the diagram Quality Function Deployment basic on the Demo Tool. Choose a fewnew functions than those provided in the complete diagram of Figure 12, and score them.

    Remember to update theset of attributes by copy from the previous diagram and paste

    them on the present new diagram of functions.

    Simulation for prioritizing functions and their requirements

    The function analysis matrix

    After having described a number of functions for fulfilling the attributes, the team decided toconvert the mind map of these functions into a matrix. This was done by clicking on the Create

    a new matrix view icon in the toolbar and choosing Function Analysis matrix. The matrix that

    appeared after completing the dialogue box looks as shown in Figure 14. The functions ( )

    were listed in the first column of this matrix and the attributes ( ) in the first row. The Overall

    Attribute Importance ( ) for the customers value creation was the first row just beneath the

    attributes. If this row is not present, click on the icon in the menu balk. It will then appear in

    the matrix view. After having done that, the participants devoted themselves to further

    identifying any functions that were yet to be added for substantiating the attributes.

    Once the list was completed, the team started with refining the scores. At the bottom of the

    matrix, 2 rows with the scores on the attributes of the current product and the desired product

    were present. These rows are characterized by a separate icon ( ).

  • 8/6/2019 Case Innovation at Retailers Vsn 2.1E

    16/21

    16

    Figure 14Function analysis for scopeof prioritization

    After all the functions were scored, the Overall Function Importance for the customer was

    calculated by clicking on icon phi ( ). A column appeared at the right with numbers between 10and 1. This number indicates the team the relative contribution of the functions to customer value

    creation.

    By clicking on the icon in the menu balk named Function Value Realization, thecontribution of the current product functions on customer value creation was calculated. The

    difference between the interest of the functions for creating customer value and how the current

    product scored on this value made it possible to calculate the opportunity for improvement.

    This was calculated using a simple formula, namely the "opportunity" is 2 times the importance

    for the customer ( ) minus the score of the current product ( ).This number may never be

    lower than the relative importance for the customer. The result is represented by omega ( ).

    Exercise 8: Simulate opportunities based on functionsConstruct the Function analysis matrix on the basis of your diagram of functions. Calculate

    Overall function importance of the new product, and identify 2 possible opportunities. Use the

    Demo Tool for this analysis.

    DefinitionGeneral Requirements areconsidered as additional valuesthat are not necessarily typicalof a specific product or service.

    General Requirements

    Customers usually have basic needs that are not necessarily

    directly related to functional details. Yet they are related to

    attributes and as important as the functions of the product or

    service in consideration. Only a few to name are costs,

    profitability to the retailer and various elements of

    reliability. In the Quality Function diagram these were

    now added by clicking on the specific icon ( ) and their

    scores are given in Figure 15.

  • 8/6/2019 Case Innovation at Retailers Vsn 2.1E

    17/21

    17

    Functional Requirements

    Specific functions are performed by dedicated elements of

    products or services. These elements may also perform other

    functions. In System Dynamics the boundaries or interfaces

    play a crucial role as to the relevance of these elements for a

    function. A functional requirement can be added byclicking on icon, and naming it. For example, number

    of applications was an essential functional requirement in

    order to provide a range of application functions. In

    essence each function is performed to certain extent by one

    or more elements.

    Simulation for prioritizing General RequirementsBy selecting these general requirements, attributes and their connecting scores, a matrix

    representation could be made for an over view. This was done by clicking on the matrix view and

    choosing for Requirement importance analysis. The resulting diagram is shown in Figure 16.

    In the figure all identified attributes and their overall importance are included. Inherent to this

    matrix, also functions and their overall importance are included. The attributes, as essential

    elements of the simulation, thus are shown to be built on a firm basis of functions that are needed

    to be put up and the general requirements that are needed be met with. Only on functional

    requirement is included on the right of the matrix for the purpose of illustration.

    Figure 15General requirements forfulfilling attributes

    DefinitionFunctional Requirements areessential elements of products

    or services with which theneeded functions will befulfilled.

  • 8/6/2019 Case Innovation at Retailers Vsn 2.1E

    18/21

    18

    Exercise 9: Simulate for finding out opportunities based on General Requirements

    Construct General requirement importance analysis matrixusing the Demo Tool.

    Figure 16General requirement importancematrix

    Conclusions on functions and requirements

    Customer value creation as general requirement could be

    calculated by clicking on the icon. The consultant added

    that these scores said something about how critical these

    requirements were to the reliability of the product. In

    quality management one has to focus upon such

    requirements. The resulting outcome was more front end

    oriented rather than that with product orientation. It showed

    that profitability for the retailer and accessibilityreliability in support of the product performance, are the

    most important general requirements of Apple iPhone Next.

    The second workshop was now almost finished. Everyone

    had the feeling that the discussions were very fruitful and

    much was achieved. Now there was a message for the

    manufacturer and also to the supplier. One thing remained

    on the priority, however: The final product should provide a

    good quality/price ratio and has to differentiate itself from

    competing products. Furthermore, it has to support the

    corporate image. In order to check this, one final exercise

    had to be executed before everyone could go home toperform his homework.

  • 8/6/2019 Case Innovation at Retailers Vsn 2.1E

    19/21

    19

    2.3.Branding

    The team explored the impact of customer values on brand

    building, and also on brand sustainability. The advisor took

    the team through Brand assessment of the product. The

    images listed in Table 1 originate from automotive industry,and are often applied to brand identification of cars. Similarly

    brand and corporate images, also of other products, can be

    identified. Many FMCG and consumer durables fall in this

    category of brand creation. Also services are easy to analyse

    using the criterion shown in Table 1.

    The team identified various brand values of the existing

    product Apple iPhone old that contribute to different brand

    images of Apple organization. By using the first choice of

    brand values in each image the archetype of the Apple could

    be established as shown in Table 1.

    DefinitionBrand is a name, sign, symbol,or design, or a combination ofthem that makes a product orservice unique.

    Brandimages

    1st Brandvalue

    2nd Brandvalue

    3rd Brandvalue

    Image 1 Revolutionary Creative OptimisticImage 2 Pioneer Original OptimisticImage 3 Innovative Exceptional ProfessionalImage 4 Attractive Dominant DreamingImage 5 Unique Path-breaking Intelligent

    Table 1Brand images and theirvalues for existing AppleiPhone old

    For this analysis the team confined to use a single product

    Apple iPhone old for finding out the archetype of the

    organization Apple. The prescribed brand values to images forthe existing Apple iPhone old yielded the archetype

    represented in Figure 17.

    It was observed that Explorer and outlaw scored quite

    high. This means Apple is a solo concern with its own

    uniqueness in innovation, and trend. All other archetypes

    including creator were quite low. The latter conclusion from

    the analysis, however, surprised everybody in the team.

    Figure 17

    Corporate image, orarchetype, of the organizationApple using the lastsuccessful product Apple

    iPhone old

  • 8/6/2019 Case Innovation at Retailers Vsn 2.1E

    20/21

    20

    Exercise 10: Assess brand image of the new productGo to Brand Assessment Tool and rank various images as you would anticipate on the future

    Apple iPhone Next. Using these scores find out the archetype of the corporation Apple.

    Exercise 11: Explore the consistency of brand image of the new productConstruct the diagram view and the matrix on the basis of the data that you have collected so far.

    Start with a blank new diagram Branding and copy into this the values that you have chosen

    before. Then identify various brand values, give possible relationship with customer values andscore them. Explore whether the brand image created by Apple iPhone Next is consistent with the

    existing image.

    Go to Brand Assessment Tool and rank various images as you would anticipate on AppleiPhone Next.

    The next consideration is whether the major brand values

    would be supported by the previously chosen customer

    values for Apple iPhone Next. Which customer values

    are elevated with the inclusion of the brand values that are

    so important to the product manufacturer and the retailer?

    In order to do this analysis, the diagram analysis was

    carried out by linking customer values ( ) with the

    identified brand values ( ) as shown in the diagram

    view of Figure 18.

    Figure 18Diagram view of corporate imagerelated to customer values

    Simulation for brand value support of the new productSubsequently using this diagram and clicking on the matrix view, corporate brand values and

    customer values were integrated. Brand value support to product value realization became evident

    to the team by clicking on and selecting Apple iPhone Next. The outcome shows that AppleiPhone Next indeed falls reasonably in line with the long held innovative vision of the

    organization.

  • 8/6/2019 Case Innovation at Retailers Vsn 2.1E

    21/21

    3. Conclusions

    Conclusions on brand management

    The team looked into the Brand matrix in Figure 19 for

    judging how far the planned new product was a step forward

    compared to the current product. It appeared that this was

    quite the case with the new iPhone Next. The consultant

    added that in order to be sure, however, we have to wait and

    see what the manufacturer, Apple Corporation, is likely to

    take up for the upcoming Indian market.

    The new product shows that the corporate image related to the brand as innovator

    is the most relevant. This means that we are on the right track. The retail manager

    concluded the innovation advisors analysis. He continued, Gentlemen, we know

    now what will help us look forward to our own business. We also know now what

    message can be given to the manufacturer about the best design and how it can

    support the corporate brand image. He closed the meeting with a strong feel of

    relief for reaching the much promising market of the most modern cell phones in

    the city.

    Figure 19Contribution of Apple iPhoneNext to corporate brand image