case report spect-ct assessment of pseudarthrosis after...

4
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Case Reports in Orthopedics Volume 2013, Article ID 502517, 3 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/502517 Case Report SPECT-CT Assessment of Pseudarthrosis after Spinal Fusion: Diagnostic Pitfall due to a Broken Screw Olivier Rager, 1 Gaël Amzalag, 1 Arthur Varoquaux, 2 Karl Schaller, 3 Osman Ratib, 1 and Enrico Tessitore 3 1 Nuclear Medicine Department, Geneva University Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland 2 Department of Radiology, Geneva University Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland 3 Department of Neurosurgery, Geneva University Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland Correspondence should be addressed to Olivier Rager; [email protected] Received 5 July 2013; Accepted 23 August 2013 Academic Editors: H. N. Modi and A. F. Ozer Copyright © 2013 Olivier Rager et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. A 43-year-old drug addicted female was referred for a L5-S1 posterolateral in situ fixation with autologous graſt because of an L5/S1 severe discopathy with listhesis. Aſter six months, low back pain recurred. A Tc-99m HDP SPECT-CT diagnosed a pseudarthrosis with intense uptake of the L5-S1 endplates and a fracture of the right S1 screw just outside the metal-bone interface without any uptake or bone resorption around the screw. e absence of uptake around a broken screw is a pitfall that the physician should be aware of. 1. Introduction Spinal fusion is a common treatment for spinal instability [1]. Nevertheless, pseudarthrosis is a well-known long-term com- plication of spinal fusion. It is defined as a nonunion 6 months aſter surgery leading to a persistent movement in a specific spinal motion segment. Symptoms of pseudarthrosis may be nonspecific, and increasing local pain is by far the most common one. Diagnosis is oſten challenging, and some recent studies have shown that new hybrid imaging using SPECT- CT (Tc-99m HDP) [2, 3] or PET-CT (F-18 NaF) [4, 5] may improve diagnostic accuracy compared to CT scan alone. 2. Case Report A 43-year-old drug addicted female was referred to neuro- surgeons for a chronic invalidating back pain and leſt side L5 sciatica, refractory to conservative treatment. A lumbar MRI showed an L5/S1 severe discopathy with Meyerding grade I listhesis and Modic type III sign (Figure 1). Surgery was limited to a L5-S1 posterolateral in situ fixation with autolo- gous graſt. Postop radiography and CT scan showed material in place and a reduction of the L5-S1 slippage (Figure 2). e patient was symptom-free for 6 months. Aſter cracking without traumatism, low back pain recurred. A SPECT-CT was performed 7 months aſter surgery (Symbia T6, Siemens Healthcare, Germany) and 3 hours aſter injection of 800 MBq (21,6 mCi) of Tc-99m hydroxymethylene diphosphonate (HDP) (Figure 3). It revealed an intense uptake of the L5- S1 endplates characteristic of pseudarthrosis and a fracture of the right S1 screw without uptake and without bone resorption around the screw. e leſt S1 screw and both L5 screws showed no abnormalities, whereas the rods did. e neurosurgeons decided for a surgical revision with a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedure, and the patient had an uneventful outcome. 3. Discussion CT scan has supplanted plain radiography and has become the most used modality to detect pseudarthrosis even if it has

Upload: others

Post on 04-Jul-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Case Report SPECT-CT Assessment of Pseudarthrosis after ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/crior/2013/502517.pdf · without traumatism, low back pain recurred. A SPECT-CT was performed

Hindawi Publishing CorporationCase Reports in OrthopedicsVolume 2013, Article ID 502517, 3 pageshttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/502517

Case ReportSPECT-CT Assessment of Pseudarthrosis after Spinal Fusion:Diagnostic Pitfall due to a Broken Screw

Olivier Rager,1 Gaël Amzalag,1 Arthur Varoquaux,2 Karl Schaller,3

Osman Ratib,1 and Enrico Tessitore3

1 Nuclear Medicine Department, Geneva University Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva,Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland

2Department of Radiology, Geneva University Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva,Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland

3Department of Neurosurgery, Geneva University Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva,Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland

Correspondence should be addressed to Olivier Rager; [email protected]

Received 5 July 2013; Accepted 23 August 2013

Academic Editors: H. N. Modi and A. F. Ozer

Copyright © 2013 Olivier Rager et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

A 43-year-old drug addicted female was referred for a L5-S1 posterolateral in situ fixation with autologous graft because of an L5/S1severe discopathy with listhesis. After six months, low back pain recurred. A Tc-99m HDP SPECT-CT diagnosed a pseudarthrosiswith intense uptake of the L5-S1 endplates and a fracture of the right S1 screw just outside the metal-bone interface without anyuptake or bone resorption around the screw. The absence of uptake around a broken screw is a pitfall that the physician should beaware of.

1. Introduction

Spinal fusion is a common treatment for spinal instability [1].Nevertheless, pseudarthrosis is awell-known long-term com-plication of spinal fusion. It is defined as a nonunion 6monthsafter surgery leading to a persistent movement in a specificspinal motion segment. Symptoms of pseudarthrosis maybe nonspecific, and increasing local pain is by far the mostcommonone.Diagnosis is often challenging, and some recentstudies have shown that new hybrid imaging using SPECT-CT (Tc-99m HDP) [2, 3] or PET-CT (F-18 NaF) [4, 5] mayimprove diagnostic accuracy compared to CT scan alone.

2. Case Report

A 43-year-old drug addicted female was referred to neuro-surgeons for a chronic invalidating back pain and left side L5sciatica, refractory to conservative treatment. A lumbar MRIshowed an L5/S1 severe discopathy with Meyerding gradeI listhesis and Modic type III sign (Figure 1). Surgery was

limited to a L5-S1 posterolateral in situ fixation with autolo-gous graft. Postop radiography and CT scan showed materialin place and a reduction of the L5-S1 slippage (Figure 2).The patient was symptom-free for 6 months. After crackingwithout traumatism, low back pain recurred. A SPECT-CTwas performed 7 months after surgery (Symbia T6, SiemensHealthcare, Germany) and 3 hours after injection of 800MBq(21,6 mCi) of Tc-99m hydroxymethylene diphosphonate(HDP) (Figure 3). It revealed an intense uptake of the L5-S1 endplates characteristic of pseudarthrosis and a fractureof the right S1 screw without uptake and without boneresorption around the screw. The left S1 screw and bothL5 screws showed no abnormalities, whereas the rods did.The neurosurgeons decided for a surgical revision with atransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedure, and thepatient had an uneventful outcome.

3. Discussion

CT scan has supplanted plain radiography and has becomethe most usedmodality to detect pseudarthrosis even if it has

Page 2: Case Report SPECT-CT Assessment of Pseudarthrosis after ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/crior/2013/502517.pdf · without traumatism, low back pain recurred. A SPECT-CT was performed

2 Case Reports in Orthopedics

(a) (b)

Figure 1: T1 (a) and T2 (b) sagittal lumbar MRI showing an L5/S1 severe discopathy with meyerding grade I listhesis and Modic type 3 sign.

(a) (b)

Figure 2: Lateral postop radiography (a) and postop CT scan (b) scan showed material in place, air in L5-S1 space, and reduction of theslippage L5-S1.

been shown to have several limitations [6]. Despite have avery high sensibility, it falsely predicts pseudarthrosis in 8%of cases [7]. Some recent studies have shown that new hybridimaging using SPECT-CT (Tc-99m HDP) or PET-CT (F-18NaF) may improve diagnostic accuracy compared to CT scanalone.

The assessment of pseudarthrosis requires the evaluationof both the posterior segment of the spine including screwsand rods and the anterior segment with or without aninterbody cage. Focal uptake in these sites is a characteristicfinding of pseudarthrosis [2–5]. In our case, persistence offocal uptake in the anterior spinal segment permitted toidentify pseudarthrosis. No uptake was observed around thefractured screw because the fracture occurred outside themetal-bone interface. By that time, the vertebral portionof the broken screw did not show any mobility or uptake.Nevertheless, this should not be considered a false negative

of SPECT-CT. This is a pitfall that the physician should beaware of. Furthermore, the integrity of the material has to becarefully inspected on CT before analyzing the SPECT.

4. Conclusions

SPECT-CT is a useful tool for diagnosis of pseudarthrosis.It may show intense uptake at different levels as in thevertebral endplates and around screws or cages. The absenceof uptake around a broken screw, as in our case, should notbe considered as a false negative. CT alone should always beinterpreted if clinical suspicion of pseudarthrosis exists.

Consent

The patient described in the case report has given hisinformed consent for the case report to be published.

Page 3: Case Report SPECT-CT Assessment of Pseudarthrosis after ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/crior/2013/502517.pdf · without traumatism, low back pain recurred. A SPECT-CT was performed

Case Reports in Orthopedics 3

(a) (b)

(c)

Figure 3: SPECT-CT revealed an intense uptake of the L5-S1 endplates (a) and a fracture of the right S1 screw without uptake and withoutbone resorption around the screw (c; arrow). The left S1 screw (c) and both L5 screws (b) showed no abnormalities, whereas the rods did.

Conflict of Interests

Theauthors have declared that there is no conflict of interests.

References

[1] J. N. Katz, “Lumbar spinal fusion: surgical rates, costs, and com-plications,” Spine, vol. 20, supplement 24, pp. 78S–83S, 1995.

[2] M. Damgaard, L. Nimb, and J. L. Madsen, “The role of boneSPECT/CT in the evaluation of lumbar spinal fusion withmetallic fixation devices,” Clinical Nuclear Medicine, vol. 35, no.4, pp. 234–236, 2010.

[3] O. Rager, K. Schaller, M. Payer, D. Tchernin, O. Ratib, and E.Tessitore, “SPECT/CT in differentiation of pseudarthrosis fromother causes of back pain in lumbar spinal fusion: report on 10consecutive cases,” Clinical Nuclear Medicine, vol. 37, no. 4, pp.339–343, 2012.

[4] A. Quon, R. Dodd, A. Iagaru et al., “Initial investigation of 18F-NaF PET/CT for identification of vertebral sites amenable tosurgical revision after spinal fusion surgery,” European Journalof Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 39, no. 11, pp.1737–1744, 2012.

[5] B. Brans, R. Weijers, S. Halders et al., “Assessment of bone graftincorporation by 18F-fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with persisting symptomsafter posterior lumbar interbody fusion,” European Journal ofNuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Research, vol. 2, no. 1,p. 42, 2012.

[6] E. R. G. Santos, D. G. Goss, R. K. Morcom, and R. D. Fraser,“Radiologic assessment of interbody fusion using carbon fibercages,” Spine, vol. 28, no. 10, pp. 997–1001, 2003.

[7] G. R. Fogel, J. S. Toohey, A. Neidre, and J.W. Brantigan, “Fusionassessment of posterior lumbar interbody fusion using radiolu-cent cages: X-ray films and helical computed tomography scanscompared with surgical exploration of fusion,” Spine Journal,vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 570–577, 2008.

Page 4: Case Report SPECT-CT Assessment of Pseudarthrosis after ...downloads.hindawi.com/journals/crior/2013/502517.pdf · without traumatism, low back pain recurred. A SPECT-CT was performed

Submit your manuscripts athttp://www.hindawi.com

Stem CellsInternational

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

MEDIATORSINFLAMMATION

of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Behavioural Neurology

EndocrinologyInternational Journal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Disease Markers

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

BioMed Research International

OncologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

PPAR Research

The Scientific World JournalHindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Immunology ResearchHindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Journal of

ObesityJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

OphthalmologyJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Diabetes ResearchJournal of

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Research and TreatmentAIDS

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Gastroenterology Research and Practice

Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Parkinson’s Disease

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Volume 2014Hindawi Publishing Corporationhttp://www.hindawi.com