case study 1: hungarian uprising october, 1956. why was there opposition in hungary? hard-line...

13
Case Study 1: Hungarian Uprising October, 1956

Upload: sophia-allday

Post on 29-Mar-2015

228 views

Category:

Documents


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Case Study 1: Hungarian Uprising October, 1956. Why was there opposition in Hungary? Hard-line leader Matyas Rakosi –No freedom of speech –Secret police

Case Study 1:Hungarian Uprising

October, 1956

Case Study 1:Hungarian Uprising

October, 1956

Page 2: Case Study 1: Hungarian Uprising October, 1956. Why was there opposition in Hungary? Hard-line leader Matyas Rakosi –No freedom of speech –Secret police

Why was there opposition in Hungary?• Hard-line leader Matyas Rakosi

– No freedom of speech– Secret police made people disappear– 1000s of Soviet troops & officials in country– Russian street signs, schools & shops– Hungarians had to pay for Soviet troops

• June 1956, party members oppose Rakosi– Rakosi asked USSR for troops, help in arresting

400 leading opponents– Kh’s Moscow refused request– Kh ordered Rakosi retired ‘for health reasons’

• Erno Gero was unacceptable replacement– 23 Oct: huge student demonstrations– Stalin’s statue pulled down– Kh’s USSR started withdrawing Soviet forces– Kh allowed new gov’t under (Red) Imre Nagy

Page 3: Case Study 1: Hungarian Uprising October, 1956. Why was there opposition in Hungary? Hard-line leader Matyas Rakosi –No freedom of speech –Secret police
Page 4: Case Study 1: Hungarian Uprising October, 1956. Why was there opposition in Hungary? Hard-line leader Matyas Rakosi –No freedom of speech –Secret police

Imre Nagy’s Government• Nagy takes over in crisis

– Hungarians created 1000s of councils to replace withdrawing Soviet power

– 1000s of (H) soldiers defected to rebel cause, taking weapons w/ them

• Nagy’s radical plans (Communist, reformer)– Hold free elections

– Create impartial courts

– Restore private ownership of farmlands

– Called for total Soviet withdrawal from (H)

– Planned to leave Warsaw Pact

– Planned to declare neutrality in Cold War

– Counted on Eisenhower, US President, supporting (H)’s attempt to break w/ USSR

Which of these demands do you think would be most threatening to the USSR?

Page 5: Case Study 1: Hungarian Uprising October, 1956. Why was there opposition in Hungary? Hard-line leader Matyas Rakosi –No freedom of speech –Secret police

How did the Soviet Union respond?• Kh unwilling to lose (H)

– Kh willing to accept some reforms

– Kh not willing to let (H) leave Warsaw Pact

– November: 1000s of Soviet troops, tanks move in to Budapest, and (H) resists

• Hungarian Revolt-Revolution-Uprising– Two weeks of bitter fighting– "This is Prime Minister Imre Nagy speaking. At

dawn, Soviet troops attacked our country in order to overthrow the legitimate Hungarian democratic government."

– 3-30,000 Hungarians, 7-8000 Soviets killed

– 200,000 Hungarians fled to Austria

• Imre Nagy imprisoned, executedWhy do you think Hungary’s membership in the Warsaw Pact was so important to the Soviet Union?

Why do you think the Hungarians received no support from the West?

Page 7: Case Study 1: Hungarian Uprising October, 1956. Why was there opposition in Hungary? Hard-line leader Matyas Rakosi –No freedom of speech –Secret police

Activity: Looking for visual clues …• Look at the four flags.

The flags are from:– Rakosi’s gov’t, 1949-56

– Rebels in the 1956 uprising

– Kadar’s gov’t, 1956-89

– State flag after 1989

• They are not in the right order. Work out which one is which

Page 8: Case Study 1: Hungarian Uprising October, 1956. Why was there opposition in Hungary? Hard-line leader Matyas Rakosi –No freedom of speech –Secret police

Results• Resistance crushed in two weeks

– UN did not help

– World preoccupied w/ Suez Crisis

• Khrushchev put Janos Kadar in charge– Took several months to crush all resistance

– 35,000 anti-Communists arrested

– 300 executed

– Kadar cautiously introduced limited reforms

– (H) would definitely stay in Warsaw Pact

Page 9: Case Study 1: Hungarian Uprising October, 1956. Why was there opposition in Hungary? Hard-line leader Matyas Rakosi –No freedom of speech –Secret police

Focus Task: Revolting Perspectives• Explain which of these statements you

most agree with, and why you agree with it (50 words):– ‘The severity of the Red Army in dealing

with Hungary in 1956 shows how fragile the Soviet hold on Hungary really was.’

– ‘The speed at which the Red Army crushed resistance in Hungary shows how completely the Soviet Union controlled Hungary.’

Page 10: Case Study 1: Hungarian Uprising October, 1956. Why was there opposition in Hungary? Hard-line leader Matyas Rakosi –No freedom of speech –Secret police

Fin

Page 11: Case Study 1: Hungarian Uprising October, 1956. Why was there opposition in Hungary? Hard-line leader Matyas Rakosi –No freedom of speech –Secret police

PSDs on the Hungarian Uprising• Living standards were declining and yet the papers and radio kept saying that

we had never had it so good. Why? Why these lies? Everybody knew the state was spending the money on armaments. Why could they not admit that we were worse off because of the war effort and the need to build new factories? … I finally arrived at the realization that the system was wrong and stupid.– A Hungarian student describes the mood of 1953

• Wearing western clothes was considered dangerous. To cite a small example: my colleague John showed up at lectures one day in a new suit, a striped shirt and necktie from the United States. His shoes were smooth suede and would have cost one month’s wages in Hungary. After classes John was summoned by the party officer. He received a tongue-lashing and was expelled.– Written by Laszlo Beke, a student who helped lead the Hungarian uprising in

1956

Using the texts above, give reasons why the Hungarians disliked Communist control

Page 12: Case Study 1: Hungarian Uprising October, 1956. Why was there opposition in Hungary? Hard-line leader Matyas Rakosi –No freedom of speech –Secret police

PSDs on the Hungarian Uprising• [Source 1] In Hungary thousands of people have obtained arms by disarming

soldiers and militia men … soldiers have been making friends with the embittered and dissatisfied masses … The authorities are paralyzed, unable to stop the bloody events.– From a report in a Yugoslav newspaper. Yugoslavia, though Communist, did

not approve of Soviet methods

• [Source 2] We have almost no weapons, no heavy guns of any kind. People are running up to the tanks, throwing in hand grenades and closing the drivers’ windows. The Hungarian people are not afraid of death. It is only a pity that we cannot last longer. Now the firing is starting again. The tanks are coming nearer and nearer. You can’t let people attack tanks with their bear hands. What is the United Nations doing?– A telex message sent by the Hungarian rebels fighting the Communists. Quoted

in George Mikes, The Hungarian Revolution, 1957

Page 13: Case Study 1: Hungarian Uprising October, 1956. Why was there opposition in Hungary? Hard-line leader Matyas Rakosi –No freedom of speech –Secret police

How do Sources 1 & 2 differ in the impression they give of the Hungarian uprising?

Why do you think they differ?

Do the photos in Source 4 give the same impression as either Source 1 or 2?

Write a paragraph explaining the nature of the fighting in Budapest using Sources 1 through 4

• [Source 3] October 27, 1956. On my way home I saw a little girl propped up against the doorway of a building with a machine gun clutched in her hands. When I tried to move her, I saw she was dead. She could not have been more than eleven or twelve years old. There was a neatly folded note in her pocket she had evidently meant to pass on to her parents. In childish scrawl it read: ‘Dear Mama, Brother is dead. He asked me to take care of his gun. I am all right, and I’m going with friends now. I kiss you. Kati.– Written by Laszlo Beke, a

Hungarian student

[Source 4]