case study 14

25
Case Study 14 Gabrielle Yeaney, M.D.

Upload: marina761

Post on 08-Jul-2015

189 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Case Study 14

Case Study 14Gabrielle Yeaney, M.D.

Page 2: Case Study 14

70-year-old man who complains of intermittent dizziness and unsteadiness for 1 week.

Describe the MRI findings (location, enhancement, mass effect).

Question 1

Page 3: Case Study 14

MRI Sagittal T1

Page 4: Case Study 14

MRI axial FLAIR

Page 5: Case Study 14

MRI axial T1 post contrast

Page 6: Case Study 14

MRI Coronal T1 post contrast

Page 7: Case Study 14

The right posterior fossa (cerebellum) shows a well-circumscribed homogeneously-enhancing dural-basedmass with extension through the tentorium to the right occipital lobe. There is some mass effect in the 4th ventricle and edema in the right cerebellar hemisphere.

Answer

Page 8: Case Study 14

Question 2Give your differential diagnosis for this dural-based mass.

Page 9: Case Study 14

AnswerMeningioma

Hemangiopericytoma (HPC)

Metastasis

Secondary Lymphoma

Other very rare entities: solitary fibrous tumor (some believe SFT may be the same as HPC but on one end of a morphologic spectrum); primary leptomeningeal melanocytoma (bright on T1, dark on T2); leiomyomatous and fibrohistiocytic tumors; synovial sarcoma

Page 10: Case Study 14

Question 3A right occipital and suboccipital craniectomy is performed and an intraoperative consult is requested. Describe the cytologic features of the touch prep and smear. 

Click here to view slides.

Page 11: Case Study 14

AnswerThere are abundant dyshesive cells with uniform ovoid nuclei and scant cytoplasm. Nuclear outlines are smooth but occasionally indented.  Nucleoli are inconspicuous. Mitotic figures are infrequent.  There are no whorls.

Page 12: Case Study 14

Question 4What is your intraoperative diagnosis? (A. Neoplastic/Defer/Non-neoplastic, B. ______)

Page 13: Case Study 14

AnswerA. Neoplastic

B. Atypical; Further classification would be difficult at this point but you could communicate a differential of atypical meningioma, hemangiopericytoma or some other mesenchymal neoplasm.

Page 14: Case Study 14

Question 5Review the permanent section of the morcellated specimen. Describe the histologic features.

Click here to view slide.

Page 15: Case Study 14

AnswerThis cellular lesion is arranged in sheets with a turbulent swirling pattern.  There is little intervening stroma, but thin strands of eosinophilic collagen can be seen between the densely packed cells.  A rare staghorn like vessel is present (black arrow).  Mitotic figures are difficult to find.

Page 16: Case Study 14

Question 6What additional studies would you order to confirm your diagnosis?

Page 17: Case Study 14

AnswerReticulin!!! IHC stains that may be helpful:  CD34, factor XIIIa, bcl-2, CD99, smooth muscle markers, leu-7, EMA, vimentin (to access immunoviablility), Ki-67

Page 18: Case Study 14

Question 7Interpret the reticulin stain and the following immunohistochemical stains.

Click here to view slides.

Page 19: Case Study 14

AnswerReticulin fibers are abundant and diffuse, surrounding individual tumor cells.  Tumor cells diffusely express CD34, vimentin and CD99 but are negative for AE1/AE3.  There is focal weak positivity for factor XIIIa and EMA.  Ki-67 shows a tumor cell proliferation rate of 4%.

Differentiating HPC from meningioma is a recurring challenge (nightmare?) for neuropathologists.  The following data is from a study that compared 19 meningeal HPCs and 19 anaplastic meningiomas (MIIIs).  IHC was performed by using EMA, CAM 5.2, CD99, Bcl-2, claudin-1 and Factor XIIIa (FXIIIa) antibodies.  FISH was performed with NF2, 4.1B (DAL-1), chromosome 1p32, and 14q32 probes.  HPCs showed strong CD99 (85% of cases), strong bcl-2 (86%), focal EMA (33%), focal claudin-1 (13%), and scattered individual cell FXIIIa (100%) positivity.  Anaplastic meningiomas showed strong EMA (89%), strong claudin-1 (54%), weak or focal CD99 (15%), weak or focal bcl-2 (31%), and individual cell FXIIIa (84%) positivity.  Focal CAM 5.2 expression was seen in 26% of HPCs and 15% of MIIIs.  Deletions were extremely common in MIIIs: 1p (94%), 14q (67%), NF2 (100%), and 4.1B (67%).  HPCs showed no 14q or 4.1B deletions, with 1 case each of 1p and NF2 deletions (6%).  The sensitivities and specificities of the 3 most useful IHC markers (EMA, CD99, bcl-2) were 85%-89% and 67%-84%, respectively.  Conclusions from the study were as follows:  (1) EMA, CD99, bcl-2, and claudin-1 IHC and 1p, 14q, NF2, and 4.1B FISH are particularly useful for distinguishing anaplastic meningiomas from meningeal HPCs.  (2) Focal EMA expression does not preclude a diagnosis of HPC.  (3) The characteristic FXIIIa staining pattern reported for HPC also is encountered frequently in anaplastic meningiomas and therefore is nonspecific in this diagnostic setting.  Rajaram V, Brat DJ, Perry A (2004) Anaplastic Meningioma Versus Meningeal Hemangiopericytoma: Immunohistochemical and Genetic Markers Human Pathology 35(11)

Page 20: Case Study 14

Question 8What is your final diagnosis?

Page 21: Case Study 14

AnswerHemangiopericytoma—The meningeal hemangiopericytoma was first described in 1928 by Bailey et al., who considered the tumor an "angioblastic" variant of meningioma. HPCs are thought to be derived from pericytes.

Page 22: Case Study 14

Question 9What is the prognosis, standard treatment etc?

Page 23: Case Study 14

AnswerDespite their amenability to surgical enucleation, HPCs have a high local recurrence rate and propensity for late metastasis.  5-, 10- and 15-year survival rates have been quoted at 67%, 40%, and 23%, respectively.  Favored metastatic sites are bone, liver, lung, CNS.  Radiotherapy may improve survival.  HPC can be subclassified into differentiated and anaplastic based on the presence of necrosis or brisk mitotic activity (>5/10 HPFs) and 2 or more of the following: hemorrhage, marked cytologic atypia, high cellularity.  Ki-67/ MIB-1 indices vary from case to case, 1%-39% in one series with little relationship to outcome. 

Page 24: Case Study 14

Question 10What is a pericyte?

Page 25: Case Study 14

Answer

Pericytes are specialized mesenchymal cells that are supportive to microvasculature.  There is evidence that pericytes participate in vascular basement membrane synthesis, contraction and phagocytosis.  Pericytes have been reported to act as oligopotential cells with the capacity to differentiate into adipocytes, osteoblasts and phagocytes when required.  In addition, pericytes are considered to play a role in angiogenesis and antigen presentation.