case study instructions updated
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/27/2019 Case Study Instructions Updated
1/3
Case study on Facebook- Eg Why is Facebook theleader of social media?
100 percent original work is required!!! Deadline by 31 March 2013(3pm, Hong Kong time Gmt
+8)
Max 3300 words per questions (exclude references andappendix)
Harvard referencing must be applied. Final product submitted in MS words
Module Title: Quantitative and Statistical Research Methods
INSTRUCTIONS:
Answers should be word processed. The University policy on referencing (Harvard) should
be fully implemented. Students will be expected to demonstrate mastery of the designated
Module information including the wider designated reading from the related text.
Students are reminded that Level 7 work requires a critical perspective to be adopted. It is
not sufficient to adopt a descriptive account alone. Answers should consider alternativeviewpoints and problematic aspects of the topic. Answers that offer an idealized version of
what should happen are unlikely to attract high marks.
LEARNING OUTCOMES
This assignment aims at ensuring that the following learning outcomes are achieved:
1. Interpret existing research as a prelude to carrying out further investigation and
demonstrate a knowledge and understanding of a range of research designs and their
appropriate utilisation;
2. Source, evaluate and appropriately reference information from a range of sources;
3. Conceptualise a problem; formulate hypotheses and objectives; design a research
strategy, collecting, analysing, and interpreting quantitative and qualitative data as
appropriate; and
4. Select and justify the most appropriate analyses, interpret the results, and write up
the results accurately and completely.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
-
7/27/2019 Case Study Instructions Updated
2/3
Question:
How to Design and Conduct a Case Study:
Select a company which you would like to carry out the case study and write a case
study report of 3000 words: +/- 10% according to the followings:
- Establish the studys question and explain why such a question should be studied.- Demonstrate the Research Strategy, i.e. the logic of design, data collection techniques,
and approaches to data analysis, applied for your case study and explain why such a
strategy is to be adopted.
- To illustrate and demonstrate how your case study is designed, i.e.
i) the studys question, i.e. who, what, where, how, and why;ii) its propositions, if any;
iii) its units(s) of analysis;
iv) the logic linking the data to the propositions; and
v) the criteria for interpreting the findings.
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
Assessment Criteria and Marking Scheme
The assessment will focus on the level ofANALYSIS carried out. That is, the application
ofTHEORETICAL CONCEPTS studied in the module to the practical case studypresented. In other words, you should proceed beyond a DESCRIPTION of the company
and its actions. You should be analysing 'why' rather than describing 'what'.
Academic Rigour (25%)
Ability to isolate the key research strategic issues
Exhibiting the ability to evaluate and analyse the research strategic issues
Coherence and depth of the analysis of those issues
Ability to analyse the case study strategy within the organisations operationsTo be able to critically review and evaluate research strategic decisions made by the
organisation
Methodology (25%)
Use of relevant evidence to support any statements made
Appropriateness of the methods used and theoretical models and frameworks applied
Breadth and depth of research undertaken
Evaluation of Data (25%)
Ability to collect and analyse research data
Ability to interpret quantitative and qualitative data as appropriate
Ability to make sound recommendations or conclusions arising from the analysis
Presentation (25%)
-
7/27/2019 Case Study Instructions Updated
3/3
Summary of arguments
Report layout and format
Use of illustrative material and evidence to support arguments
Appropriateness of length
Quantity and accuracy of referencing