case study: national survey of family growth karen e. davis national center for health statistics...

31

Upload: ashley-wilkins

Post on 18-Jan-2018

221 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

NCHS SURVEYS Records based –Data from vital and medical records – e.g. NDI, VSCP Population based –Data from personal interviews – e.g. NHIS, NSFG, NIS, SLAITS,NHANES Establishment based –Data from hospital records/facility interviews – e.g. NAMCS, NHAMCS, NHDS, NNHS 3

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service
Page 2: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH

Karen E. DavisNational Center for Health Statistics

Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

NCHS Data Users Conference, Washington, D.C. July 12, 2006

Page 3: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

NCHS SURVEYS• Records based

– Data from vital and medical records– e.g. NDI, VSCP

• Population based– Data from personal interviews– e.g. NHIS, NSFG, NIS, SLAITS,NHANES

• Establishment based– Data from hospital records/facility interviews – e.g. NAMCS, NHAMCS, NHDS, NNHS

3

Page 4: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

PRESENTATION OUTLINE

• The NSFG Cycle 6 Sample• SRS versus complex?• Estimates from NSFG Data• Cycle 7 Sample

4

Page 5: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

NSFG Background

• NSFG data are a source of information on childbearing, pregnancy, and related events

• Collects statistics on family formation, childbearing, marriage, divorce, and cohabitation

• Conducted periodically: 1973, 1976, 1982, 1988, 1995, 2002-2003

5

Page 6: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

NSFG Cycle 6

• Previous cycles were nationally representative area samples of the civilian noninstitutionalized population of women

• Cycle 6 surveys both men and women 15-44 years of age

• Main data collection Mar. 2002–Feb. 2003

6

Page 7: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

Key Analytical Goals of Cycle 6

• Compare key statistics within Cycle 6 by race/ethnicity and age

• Compare key statistics between survey cycles

7

Page 8: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

Key Statistics of Cycle 6

• Proportion of teenagers who have ever had sexual intercourse;

• Proportion of teenagers who used a condom at their most recent intercourse;

• Proportion of each 5-year age group who are currently using the oral contraceptive pill; and

• Proportion of childless women by age who have impaired fecundity.

8

Page 9: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

Cycle 6 Sample Design

• 121 PSU stratified multistage cluster sample of households

• Primary selection: blocks– Select 1,414 segments– Select 40 households per segment

• 55,000 selected housing units

9

Page 10: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

Cycle 6 Distribution by Region

10

Region Number of Segments Number of HUs

Northeast 341 13,420

Southeast 336 13,145

West 399 15,675

Midwest 324 12,760

Total 1400 55,000

Source: ISR

Page 11: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

Cycle 6 Sample Design Features

• 12,571 completed interviews

– Females and Males 15-44

– Higher rates for African-Americans, Hispanics and 15-19 year-olds

11

Page 12: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

Cycle 6 Analytical Subdomains

12

Age

Females Males

Black Hispanic Other Black Hispanic Other

15-19

20-24

25-44

Page 13: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

Cycle 6 Sample Design Features

• Within Household Selection

– Select one eligible person at random

– Implement selection in Blaise software– Age-gender-race/ethnicity selection cells– Vary sampling rates across cells

13

Page 14: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

Cycle 6 Sample Design

Why not use Simple Random Sampling?

14

Page 15: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

Simple Random Sampling

• All frame elements have an equal chance of selection

• All combinations of frame elements (of the given sample size) have an equal chance of selection

15

Page 16: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

Simple Random Sampling

• Costly data collection – sampling individual members of the population

• Does not assure representation of special sub-groups of interest

• No complete, up-to-date listing of individual members of the population

16

Page 17: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

Use of complex designs

• Cluster sampling is a low-cost device for fixing the probability of including each member of the population in the sample

• Complete listings of clusters (e.g. counties) are readily available

• Special subgroups are sampled at higher rates to assure sample size

17

Page 18: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

Use of complex designs

• Can reduce sampling error over simple random sampling depending on allocation of strata

• Can reduce travel or other data collection costs• Unequal selection probabilities can increase the

sample size of rare units

18

Page 19: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

Cycle 6 Sample Design

• Complex design is essential for NSFG targets:

– Females and Males 15-44

– Higher rates for African-Americans, Hispanics and 15-19 year-olds

19

Page 20: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

Cycle 6 Responsive DesignMore timely data on field costs and response rates • ISR developed SurveyTrak system for daily info on

hours of effort required to obtain interviews• Field administrative data used for statistical

modeling and statistical process control analysis• Prevent cost over-runs and manage fieldwork given

limited budget• Implement double sample in final month

20

Page 21: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

NSFG Weighting

• The product of four factors is used to create a single weight for each case:

• Factor 1: Base sampling weights – Inverse of selection probabilities

• Factor 2: First-stage ratio adjustment– Counteracts sampling variation across primary

sampling units within a stratum

21

Page 22: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

NSFG Weighting

• Factor 3: Nonresponse adjustment– Includes eligibility, noncontact, and refusal

adjustments

• Factor 4: Poststratification adjustment– Uses external population totals for ratio

adjustments by age, gender, and race/ethnicity

22

Page 23: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

NSFG Imputation

• Logical Imputation– Deduce missing answer from answers to other

questions

• Multivariate sequential regression– Model based on nonmissing predictors

23

Page 24: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

NSFG Variance Estimation

• Should reflect complex design including unequal selection probabilities and clustering of respondents

• A variance estimate based on a simple random sample will likely underestimate the actual sampling variance

24

Page 25: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

NSFG Variance Estimation

• Taylor Series or pseudo-replication

• Complex variance estimation software (e.g. SUDAAN, WesVarPC, SAS)

25

Page 26: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

NSFG Design Effects

• Provide a summary measure of the combined effects of stratification, clustering, and unequal weighting on the variance of a survey estimate.

• Design Effects are generally larger for subgroups that are oversampled because of the sample design.

26

Page 27: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

NSFG Cycle 7

Continuous interviewing• 4400 male and female respondents per year• Content similar to Cycle 6• Collect data more frequentlyResponsive design• Reduce cost per case

27

Page 28: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

NSFG Cycle 7 Sample Design

• Use the same 8 large Metro areas each year, plus 25 new PSUs each year

– Year 1: 33 PSUs (8 +25) (2006-2007)– Year 2: 58 PSUs (8 +50) (2008)– Year 3: 83 PSUs (8 + 75) (2009)– Year 4: 108 PSUs (8 + 100) (2010)

28

Page 29: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

Sample Size Yields for Cycle 7

29

Cycle 6 Cycle 7

(2002)Jun 2006-Dec 2007

Jun 2006- Dec 2010

Total 12,571 6,600 19,800

15-19 2,271 1,200 3,100

Male 4,928 2,970 8,900

Female 7,643 3,630 10,900

Hispanic 2,712 1,313 3,940

Black 2,460 1,340 4,020

Source: ISR

Page 30: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

References for the NSFG Design: NCHS Publications

National Survey of Family Growth, Cycle 6: Sample Design, Weighting, Imputation and Variance Estimation. Series 2, No. 142 (June, 2006)

Plan and Operation of Cycle 6 of the National Survey of Family Growth. Series 1, No. 42 (August, 2005)

Both are available at NCHS website.

30

Page 31: CASE STUDY: NATIONAL SURVEY OF FAMILY GROWTH Karen E. Davis National Center for Health Statistics Coordinating Center for Health Information and Service

NCHS website:www.cdc.gov/nchs/

• Contact: Karen E. Davis Email: [email protected]

31