case study on dlf

Upload: sagar-parekh

Post on 14-Apr-2018

294 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Case Study on DLF

    1/2

    Competition Commission of India (CCI) has modified the agreement between DLF

    group and apartment buyers in two of its projects , wherein the realty major was found

    to have abused its dominant position.

    CCI had passed its original order on August 12, 2011 wherein it had held that DLF Ltdwas a dominant enterprise and violated the provisions of the Competition Act by

    entering into an agreement with apartment allottees that was one sided, abusive and

    unfair to the allottees.

    The terms of the Apartment Buyers Agreement have been modified in a manner which it

    considers fair and reasonable and takes into account the interest of both parties, the

    Ministry of Corporate Affairs said.

    The move is expected to make agreements more equitable to buyers, a major change

    from the builder-centric pact so far. At least 16 sub-clauses, found abusive and unfairhave been deleted.

    DLF fell as much as 2.3 percent in early trade on Friday after the fair play

    watchdog passed the order.

    The apartment buyer agreement has been modified after a direction from the

    Competition Appellate Tribunal (COMPAT), where DLF had challenged a penalty of Rs

    630 crore imposed on it by CCI. The order came after complaints filed by flat buyers

    association of two DLF projects DLF Park Palace and The Belaire.

    CCI said in a statement that the apartment buyers agreement has been amended such

    that the abusive and unfair conditions present in the original one-sided agreement have

    been removed.

    The agreement between DLF and apartment allottees has been modified through a

    supplementary order passed by CCI,

    The COMPAT had asked CCI in March, 2012 to pass an order specifying the extent and

    manner in which terms and conditions of the Apartment Buyers Agreement need to be

    modified.

    CCI also said it has considered the relevant provisions of the laws applicable to the

    development of group housing projects in Haryana, particularly the mandatory

    requirements that must be followed by every developer/builder, but were not followed by

    DLF in this instance.

    CCI has disallowed any additional construction beyond the approved building plan.

    Group housing projects must be constructed in line with the layout plans, floor plans and

    specifications. Builders will also have to adhere to the compensation promised to thebuyers in case of delay in construction or delivery of flats.

  • 7/29/2019 Case Study on DLF

    2/2

    It also said the builder will no longer have sole ownership of open spaces within the

    residential project area not sold to the allottee and has suggested a joint ownership

    mechanism among the owners.

    Whether a real estate company is dominant or not, DLF was found to be dominantbecause it was big, most of them follow the same format pattern that flows from big

    players in the market,As per Mr Ashok Chawla (CCI chairman)

    The CCI had passed its order against DLF following its inquiries into complaints filed by

    flat buyer associations of two DLF projects in Gurgaon, DLF Park Palace and The

    Belaire, alleging delays in the project and increase in the number of floors than planned

    earlier, among other things.