cast iron replacement / lining methods...cast iron 32% protected steel* 10% plastic 28 % 1,396 miles...

28
1 Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods

Upload: others

Post on 20-Mar-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

1

Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods

Page 2: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

2

conEdisonService Territory

WestchesterCounty

Brooklyn

Queens

Manhattan Bronx

StatenIsland

Electric Only

Gas & Electric

Long Island

Page 3: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

3

Gas System – Mains by Material1987

4,114 Miles

Unprot. Steel45%

Cast Iron42%

Protected Steel6%Plastic

7%

1,725Miles

254Miles

1,836Miles

299Miles

20064306 Miles Unprot. Steel

30%

Cast Iron32%

Protected Steel*10%

Plastic28%

1,396Miles

412Miles

1,304Miles

1,194Miles

Page 4: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

4

Estimated Emissions Reduction

• Emissions reduction of over 135 MMscf per year

• Savings of almost $1,000,000 per year

• Avoided maintenance costs

Page 5: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

5

Incoming Leaks

0

3,000

6,000

9,000

12,000

15,000

87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Year End Actual Year End Projected

Page 6: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

6

Leak Backlog

0

4,000

8,000

12,000

16,000

87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 9920

0020

0120

0220

0320

0420

0520

0620

07

Year End Actual Year End Goal

Page 7: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

7

Emission Reduction Methods

• Repair

• System Pressure Optimization

• Pipe Replacement / Rehabilitation

Page 8: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

8

Cast Iron Mains (32%)• Manufactured in 12 foot sections

• Joined using bell and spigot joints, subject to leaking

• Highly resistant to corrosion

• Extremely brittle, subject to cracking

Page 9: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

9

• Leaks on Cast Iron Pipe

• 1396 miles x 5280 ft/mile = 7,370,880 ft

• 1 joint every 12 ft = 614,240 joints on system

• Leakage on CI joints can be reduced by 50% if

pressure is lowered from 11” wc to 6” wc.

Pressure Optimization

Page 10: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

10

Leak Migration vs. Pressure

Page 11: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

11

Eliminating Leaks on Cast Iron

• Replacement

• Joint Repair

• Internal Lining

Page 12: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

12

Replacement Methods

• Direct Bury

• Costly

• Upsize main in areas where increased pressure / flow required

• Insert

• Reduced capacity

• Con Split

Page 13: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

13

Con Split

• Minimize Excavation

• Upsize or same size installation

• Used in Cast Iron without sleeve

• Need to be away from other utilities

• Service lateral density will increase cost

Page 14: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

14

Joint Repair

• Keyhole

• Small Excavation

• Not for High Temps

• CISBOT

• Internal / Live

• Seal 25 Joints from one Excavation

• 6” – 12”

Page 15: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

15

Internal Lining

• Cured in Place Liners

• Starline

• Tight Fit Polyethylene

• Rolldown

• Size for Size Insertion

• Reduction of Capacity

• Subline

• Size for Size

• Minimal Reduction of Capacity

Page 16: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

16

Starline – Cured in Place LinerHOST PIPE

ADHESIVE

WOVENLINER

INTERNALCOATING

Components of Liner

• Polyester woven liner

• Polyurethane coating

Page 17: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

17

Starline Process1. Surface preparation / Pipe cleaning

• Grit-blasting method

• Required to obtain the proper bonding strength

• Abrasive is propelled through the blast hose at 100 psi

• Recovery of the grit is obtained by a high capacity

vacuum system

Page 18: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

18

Starline Process2. Adhesive Mixing

2-part Polyurethane adhesive mix

• Adhesive

• Hardener

3. Liner wet–out / Adhesive application

• Pour adhesive into liner

• Pull liner throughcalibrated rollers

Page 19: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

19

Starline Process4. Liner Inversion

Wound on reel of pressure drum

Bolted onto inversion cone

Attached to host pipe

Liner forced to invert inside host pipe

Liner ends at catch basket

Page 20: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

20

Starline – Cured in Place Liner

Page 21: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

21

Starline Process5. Steam curing & pressure monitoring

Steam Boiler

Air Compressor

Mixing ChamberTemperature and Pressure

Control

Liner

Page 22: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

22

Starline Process6. Post-lining inspection

7. Service reinstatement (if necessary)

8. Final pipe construction and restoration

Page 23: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

23

• Developed by Subterra UK.• Concentric reduction and installation of close-fit PE pipe

liners• Uses standard PE-80/PE-100 pipe Uses thick-walled PE pipe• Diameter reduction is typically 10%• Reverted to a close fit by cold water pressurisation

Rolldown

Page 24: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

24

Rolldown - Process

• Diameter range 4” - 20” SDR 11 - 33

• Bends up to 11¼o can be negotiated

• Typical lining lengths 1000 feet

• Long insertion trench required

• Excavations required to reconnect service connections/laterals etc

Page 25: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

25

Rolldown - Process

Page 26: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

26

• Subline is a process for the cold folding and installation of close-fit, thin-wall PE pipe liners

• Uses standard PE-80/PE-100 pipe • Subline was developed to allow lining of large diameter

pipes & improve ability to negotiate bends• Liner insertion process is simple slip lining• Reverted to a close fit by cold water pressurisation

Subline

Page 27: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

27

Subline

• Available for PE diameters 3” – 59”

• SDR 26 - 80, depending on diameter

• Folded shape helps insertion, bends up to 22½o can be negotiated

• Lengths up to 1000 ft

• Long lead-in trenches for welded PE strings

• Local excavations to reconnect service connections/laterals etc

Page 28: Cast Iron Replacement / Lining Methods...Cast Iron 32% Protected Steel* 10% Plastic 28 % 1,396 Miles 412 1,304 Miles 1,194 Miles 4 Estimated Emissions Reduction • Emissions reduction

28

Subline - Process