catering for learner diversity – using variation theory to enhance students’ understanding of...

24
Catering for learner Catering for learner diversity –using diversity –using variation theory to variation theory to enhance students’ enhance students’ understanding of understanding of argumentative writing argumentative writing Pat Heung Central Primary School – To Kwok Kuen 2009.2. 19

Upload: flora-patterson

Post on 27-Dec-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Catering for learner diversity –Catering for learner diversity –using variation theory to enhance using variation theory to enhance

students’ understanding of students’ understanding of argumentative writingargumentative writing

Catering for learner diversity –Catering for learner diversity –using variation theory to enhance using variation theory to enhance

students’ understanding of students’ understanding of argumentative writingargumentative writing

Pat Heung Central Primary School – To Kwok Kuen

2009.2.19

Background and Aim• New English Language Curriculum Guide

(different text types - 6 categories*)

• Individual differences (reading comprehension)

• Students learning problems (lack the experience)

• *Narrative texts, Information texts, Exchanges, Procedural texts, Explanatory texts, Persuasive texts, (CDC, 2004 - p.17)

Aim:

To use variation theory to improve students’ understanding of argumentative writing

Background and Aim

Flowchart

About the lesson preparation……

• Students had problems in understanding the structure of argumentative writing

• Students had great individual differences

• A pre-test was conducted in order

to better understand their ways of understanding or seeing argumentative writing

Students’ different ways of seeing (Pre-test)

Case 1

Teacher : What is argumentative writing?

Student A: Oh, argumentative writing is to argue about … write something to tell someone that this is good and this is bad and argue about it.Case 2

Teacher : What is argumentative writing?

Student B: There is no who, where, what and when and no background

information in argumentative writing.

Students’ different ways of seeing (Pre-test)

Case 3

Teacher : What is argumentative writing?

Student C: Oh, argumentative writing is to argue about … write something to tell someone that this is good and this is

bad and argue about it.Case 4

Teacher : What is argumentative writing?

Student D: Argumentative writing has many paragraphs but fewer words.

Students’ different ways of seeing (Pre-test)

Case 5

Teacher : What is argumentative writing?

Student E: Argumentative writing is something about gossip.

Case 6

Teacher : What is argumentative writing?

Student F: I don’t know.

About the lesson preparation……

• Dr Pang’s suggestions• 3 experienced English teachers prepared and

designed the lessons together

- We focused on:• Students’ learning problems• Students’ learning diversity

About the lesson preparation……The 2 critical aspects identified are:

• 1. different ways of reading texts resulting in different understandings

• 2. different genres having different structures

Lesson plan (1)

Pattern of variation/ invariance OutcomeText Act Learner

i v iMakes act visible

Text Meaning Learneri v v

Makes meaning visible

Text Act Learnerv i i

Generalizes act across texts

Text Meaning Genrev i v

Brings out genre related differences between texts

Text Type Characteristicsv i v

Brings out differences between texts within same genre

Lesson plan (1)Stage 1 Teacher uses the variation theory to make the act visible(Same text A but different in act)Students should discern that there are different ways of reading

Stage 2 Teacher uses the variation theory to make the meaning visible (Same text A but different in meaning from their summaries)Up to here, students should discern if they use different ways of reading to read a text, they may have different understandings on the same text.

Lesson plan (1)

Stage 3Teacher generalizes act across texts(Read text A and B and generalize the way of understanding and reading the texts)*

Students should discern the relationship between the way of reading and the understanding of the text

*-Text A and B are narrative texts

Lesson plan (1)

Stage 4 Teacher points out genre-related differences between texts (narrative and argumentative)

Read text C (similar topic/meaning to text B but different in genre, that is argumentative)

Lesson plan (1)

Stage 5Teacher guides students to discuss the differences between text C and text D (both of them are argumentative texts but they have different themes)

Teacher brings out differences between texts within same genre

The 3 teachers discussed the performance of students in the 4 lessons after the instruction.

The teachers reviewed the students’ work and interviewed some students. They found that after the two critical aspects of the object of learning were introduced, students had no significant improvement after the instruction.

Reflection

The teachers decided to start another cycle to deal with the students’ problem.

After discussion, it was concluded that some critical aspects of the object of learning might be missed and the texts that students have read might be too difficult for them at this level.

Reflection

The three additional critical aspects:

3. the difference between the meaning of descriptive sentence and writer’s opinion

4. the words used in argumentative and narrative writing (support, agree, should….)

5. the structures of argumentative and narrative writing.

Reflection

Two extra lessons were spent on helping students achieve the object of learning. At the same time, all the texts used in the lessons were tailored and shortened.

Reflection

Lesson plan (2)Example 1:

Ask students to read the 5 sentences on the left-handed column (writer’s opinion)Guide them to find out the similarities of the 5 sentences

Variant: wordingsInvariant: function of the sentences

Separation and generalization 

Lesson plan (2)Example 2:

Let students read text C (Theme - Lies and Honesty, argumentative) Text C has a similar topic to text B (Theme - An Honest Boy, narrative)

Variant: structure of the text (genre)Invariant: themeStudents may discern the differences of the text structure.

Contrast

• Introducing variations in the second instructional design did help improve students’ understanding of the features of argumentative writing.

• Students made significant improvement in discerning the features of argumentative writing.

• More than half of them were able to either state

the features of argumentative writing or categorize the given texts correctly.

Results

• Appropriate and sufficient variations be introduced in teaching to enhance students’ learning.

• Teacher’s reflection is important to the use of variation theory in teaching and learning.

Suggestions

Thank you !