catholic encyclopedia_ catholics and evolution.pdf

4
Catholics and Evolution Help support New Advent and get the full contents of this website as an instant download or CDROM. Includes the Catholic Encyclopedia, Church Fathers, Summa, Bible and more — all for only $19.99... One of the most important questions for every educated Catholic of today is: What is to be thought of the theory of evolution? Is it to be rejected as unfounded and inimical to Christianity, or is it to be accepted as an established theory altogether compatible with the principles of a Christian conception of the universe? We must carefully distinguish between the different meanings of the words theory of evolution in order to give a clear and correct answer to this question. We must distinguish (1) between the theory of evolution as a scientific hypothesis and as a philosophical speculation; (2) between the theory of evolution as based on theistic principles and as based on a materialistic and atheistic foundation; (3) between the theory of evolution and Darwinism; (4) between the theory of evolution as applied to the vegetable and animal kingdoms and as applied to man. As a scientific hypothesis, the theory of evolution seeks to determine the historical succession of the various species of plants and of animals on our earth, and, with the aid of palæontology and other sciences, such as comparative morphology, embryology, and bionomy, to show how in the course of the different geological epochs they gradually evolve from their beginnings by purely natural causes of specific development. The theory of evolution, then, as a scientific hypothesis, does not consider the present species of plants and of animals as forms directly created by God, but as the final result of an evolution from other species existing in former geological periods. Hence it is called "the theory of evolution", or "the theory of descent", since it implies the descent of the present from extinct species. This theory is opposed to the theory of constancy, which assumes the immutability of organic species. The scientific theory of evolution, therefore, does not concern itself with the origin of life. It merely inquires into the genetic relations of systematic species, genera, and families, and endeavours to arrange them according to natural series of descent (genetic trees). How far is the theory of evolution based on observed facts? It is understood to be still only an hypothesis. The formation of new species is directly observed in but a few cases, and

Upload: johnsebastiancumpston

Post on 16-Sep-2015

226 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 6/6/2015 CATHOLICENCYCLOPEDIA:CatholicsandEvolution

    http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05654a.htm 1/4

    CatholicsandEvolutionHelpsupportNewAdventandgetthefullcontentsofthiswebsiteasaninstantdownloadorCDROM.IncludestheCatholicEncyclopedia,ChurchFathers,Summa,Bibleandmoreallforonly$19.99...

    OneofthemostimportantquestionsforeveryeducatedCatholicoftodayis:Whatistobethoughtofthetheoryofevolution?IsittoberejectedasunfoundedandinimicaltoChristianity,orisittobeacceptedasanestablishedtheoryaltogethercompatiblewiththeprinciplesofaChristianconceptionoftheuniverse?

    Wemustcarefullydistinguishbetweenthedifferentmeaningsofthewordstheoryofevolutioninordertogiveaclearandcorrectanswertothisquestion.Wemustdistinguish(1)betweenthetheoryofevolutionasascientifichypothesisandasaphilosophicalspeculation(2)betweenthetheoryofevolutionasbasedontheisticprinciplesandasbasedonamaterialisticandatheisticfoundation(3)betweenthetheoryofevolutionandDarwinism(4)betweenthetheoryofevolutionasappliedtothevegetableandanimalkingdomsandasappliedtoman.

    Asascientifichypothesis,thetheoryofevolutionseekstodeterminethehistoricalsuccessionofthevariousspeciesofplantsandofanimalsonourearth,and,withtheaidofpalontologyandothersciences,suchascomparativemorphology,embryology,andbionomy,toshowhowinthecourseofthedifferentgeologicalepochstheygraduallyevolvefromtheirbeginningsbypurelynaturalcausesofspecificdevelopment.Thetheoryofevolution,then,asascientifichypothesis,doesnotconsiderthepresentspeciesofplantsandofanimalsasformsdirectlycreatedbyGod,butasthefinalresultofanevolutionfromotherspeciesexistinginformergeologicalperiods.Henceitiscalled"thetheoryofevolution",or"thetheoryofdescent",sinceitimpliesthedescentofthepresentfromextinctspecies.Thistheoryisopposedtothetheoryofconstancy,whichassumestheimmutabilityoforganicspecies.Thescientifictheoryofevolution,therefore,doesnotconcernitselfwiththeoriginoflife.Itmerelyinquiresintothegeneticrelationsofsystematicspecies,genera,andfamilies,andendeavourstoarrangethemaccordingtonaturalseriesofdescent(genetictrees).

    Howfaristhetheoryofevolutionbasedonobservedfacts?Itisunderstoodtobestillonlyanhypothesis.Theformationofnewspeciesisdirectlyobservedinbutafewcases,and

  • 6/6/2015 CATHOLICENCYCLOPEDIA:CatholicsandEvolution

    http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05654a.htm 2/4

    onlywithreferencetosuchformsasarecloselyrelatedtoeachotherforinstance,thesystematicspeciesoftheplantgenusnothera,andofthebeetlegenusDimarda.Itis,however,notdifficulttofurnishanindirectproofofgreatprobabilityforthegeneticrelationofmanysystematicspeciestoeachotherandtofossilforms,asinthegeneticdevelopmentofthehorse(Equid),ofammonites,andofmanyinsects,especiallyofthosethatdwellas"guests"withantsandtermites,andhaveadaptedthemselvesinmanywaystotheirhosts.Uponcomparingthescientificproofsfortheprobabilityofthetheoryofevolution,wefindthattheygrowthemorenumerousandweighty,thesmallerthecircleofformsunderconsideration,butbecomeweakerandweaker,ifweincludeagreaternumberofforms,suchasarecomprisedinaclassorinasubkingdom.Thereis,infact,noevidencewhateverforthecommongeneticdescentofallplantsandanimalsfromasingleprimitiveorganism.Hencethegreaternumberofbotanistsandzoologistsregardapolygenetic(polyphyletic)evolutionasmuchmoreacceptablethanamonogenetic(monophyletic).Atpresent,however,itisimpossibletodecidehowmanyindependentgeneticseriesmustbeassumedintheanimalandvegetablekingdoms.Thisisthegistofthetheoryofevolutionasascientifichypothesis.ItisinperfectagreementwiththeChristianconceptionoftheuniverseforScripturedoesnottellusinwhatformthepresentspeciesofplantsandofanimalswereoriginallycreatedbyGod.Asearlyas1877Knabenbauerstated"thatthereisnoobjection,sofarasfaithisconcerned,toassumingthedescentofallplantandanimalspeciesfromafewtypes"(StimmenausMariaLaach,XIII,p.72).

    Passingnowtothetheoryofevolutionasaphilosophicalspeculation,thehistoryoftheplantandanimalkingdomsuponourglobeisbutasmallpartofthehistoryoftheentireearth.Similarly,thegeologicaldevelopmentofourearthconstitutesbutasmallpartofthehistoryofthesolarsystemandoftheuniverse.Thetheoryofevolutionasaphilosophicalconceptionconsiderstheentirehistoryofthecosmosasanharmoniousdevelopment,broughtaboutbynaturallaws.ThisconceptionisinagreementwiththeChristianviewoftheuniverse.GodistheCreatorofheavenandearth.IfGodproducedtheuniversebyasinglecreativeactofHiswill,thenitsnaturaldevelopmentbylawsimplantedinitbytheCreatoristothegreatergloryofHisDivinepowerandwisdom.St.Thomassays:"Thepotencyofacauseisthegreater,themoreremotetheeffectstowhichitextends."(Summac.Gent.,III,c.lxxvi)andFranciscoSurez:"Goddoesnotinterferedirectlywiththenaturalorder,wheresecondarycausessufficetoproducetheintendedeffect"(Deoperesexdierum,II,c.x,n.13).InthelightofthisprincipleoftheChristianinterpretationofnature,thehistoryoftheanimalandvegetablekingdomsonourplanetis,asitwere,aversicleinavolumeofamillionpagesinwhichthenaturaldevelopmentofthecosmosisdescribed,anduponwhosetitlepageiswritten:"InthebeginningGodcreatedheavenandearth."

    Theisticvs.atheistictheoriesofevolution

  • 6/6/2015 CATHOLICENCYCLOPEDIA:CatholicsandEvolution

    http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05654a.htm 3/4

    Thetheoryofevolutionjuststatedrestsonatheisticfoundation.Incontradistinctiontothisisanothertheoryrestingonamaterialisticandatheisticbasis,thefirstprincipleofwhichisthedenialofapersonalCreator.Thisatheistictheoryofevolutionisineffectualtoaccountforthefirstbeginningofthecosmosorforthelawofitsevolution,sinceitacknowledgesneithercreatornorlawgiver.Naturalscience,moreover,hasprovedthatspontaneousgenerationi.e.theindependentgenesisofalivingbeingfromnonlivingmattercontradictsthefactsofobservation.ForthisreasonthetheistictheoryofevolutionpostulatesaninterventiononthepartoftheCreatorintheproductionofthefirstorganisms.Whenandhowthefirstseedsoflifewereimplantedinmatter,we,indeed,donotknow.TheChristiantheoryofevolutionalsodemandsacreativeactfortheoriginofthehumansoul,sincethesoulcannothaveitsorigininmatter.Theatheistictheoryofevolution,onthecontrary,rejectstheassumptionofasoulseparatefrommatter,andtherebysinksintoblankmaterialism.

    Thetheoryofevolutionvs.Darwinism

    Darwinismandthetheoryofevolutionarebynomeansequivalentconceptions.ThetheoryofevolutionwaspropoundedbeforeCharlesDarwin'stime,byLamarck(1809)andGeoffroydeSaintHilaire.Darwin,in1859,gaveitanewformbyendeavouringtoexplaintheoriginofspeciesbymeansofnaturalselection.Accordingtothistheorythebreedingofnewspeciesdependsonthesurvivalofthefittestinthestruggleforexistence.TheDarwiniantheoryofselectionisDarwinismadheringtothenarrower,andaccurate,senseoftheword.Asatheory,itisscientificallyinadequate,sinceitdoesnotaccountfortheoriginofattributesfittedtothepurpose,whichmustbereferredbacktotheinterior,originalcausesofevolution.Haeckel,withothermaterialists,hasenlargedthisselectiontheoryofDarwin'sintoaphilosophicalworldidea,byattemptingtoaccountforthewholeevolutionofthecosmosbymeansofthechancesurvivalofthefittest.ThistheoryisDarwinisminthesecondary,andwider,senseoftheword.Itisthatatheisticalformofthetheoryofevolutionwhichwasshownaboveunder(2)tobeuntenable.ThethirdsignificationofthetermDarwinismarosefromtheapplicationofthetheoryofselectiontoman,whichislikewiseimpossibleofacceptance.Inthefourthplace,Darwinismfrequentlystands,inpopularusage,forthetheoryofevolutioningeneral.Thisuseofthewordrestsonanevidentconfusionofideas,andmustthereforebesetaside.

    Humanevolutionvs.plantandanimalevolution

    Towhatextentisthetheoryofevolutionapplicabletoman?ThatGodshouldhavemadeuseofnatural,evolutionary,originalcausesintheproductionofman'sbody,ispersenotimprobable,andwaspropoundedbySt.Augustine(seeSAINTAUGUSTINEOFHIPPO,underV.AugustinisminHistory).Theactualproofsofthedescentofman'sbodyfromanimalsis,however,inadequate,especiallyinrespecttopaleontology.Andthehumansoulcouldnothavebeenderivedthroughnaturalevolutionfromthatofthebrute,sinceit

  • 6/6/2015 CATHOLICENCYCLOPEDIA:CatholicsandEvolution

    http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05654a.htm 4/4

    isofaspiritualnatureforwhichreasonwemustreferitsorigintoacreativeactonthepartofGod.

    Trip to the Holy LandYour next life changing moment Awaits you in the land of the bible

    Sources

    Forathoroughexposition,WASMANN,ModernBiologyandtheTheoryofEvolution(FreiburgimBr.,1904).Oftheolderliterature,MIVART,OntheGenesisofSpecies(LondonandNewYork,1871).

    Aboutthispage

    APAcitation.Wasmann,E.(1909).CatholicsandEvolution.InTheCatholicEncyclopedia.NewYork:RobertAppletonCompany.RetrievedJune6,2015fromNewAdvent:http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05654a.htm

    MLAcitation.Wasmann,Erich."CatholicsandEvolution."TheCatholicEncyclopedia.Vol.5.NewYork:RobertAppletonCompany,1909.6Jun.2015.

    Transcription.ThisarticlewastranscribedforNewAdventbyWGKofron.WiththankstoSt.Mary'sChurch,Akron,Ohio.

    Ecclesiasticalapprobation.NihilObstat.May1,1909.RemyLafort,Censor.Imprimatur.+JohnM.Farley,ArchbishopofNewYork.

    Contactinformation.TheeditorofNewAdventisKevinKnight.Myemailaddressiswebmasteratnewadvent.org.Regrettably,Ican'treplytoeveryletter,butIgreatlyappreciateyourfeedbackespeciallynotificationsabouttypographicalerrorsandinappropriateads.