case

stud

ies - m

ah

ara

shtra

389

CCA/Mah/CS8/Dhule/Baripada/Forest protection

Baripada village, Dhule

BackgroundBaripada village is a part of Sakri Block in Dhule district of Maharashtra. The village is surrounded

by a 445 ha forest supporting a rich vegetation composed of species such as teak or saag, devakhumba, palas, pangara, ain, kumbha, moha or mahua, neem or kadulimb, karwand and others. Wild animals found here are panther, Indian wolf, black-naped hare, fox, monitor lizard, and others.

Towards community conservationTowards the end of the 1980s and in the early

1990s, illegal felling of teak and other plants was done mainly by outsiders. Villagers noticed that the hill near the village, which had always been green, was turning into a barren and dry sand pile. This began to worry the villagers. In addition, Chaitram Pawar, a youth in the village, was noticing some other harmful effects.

The supply of fuelwood had become irregular. A third of the 35 wells in the village had gone dry. Forest degradation was leading to a number of other social problems. In the absence of other livelihood options, women had turned to liquor production as a source of secondary income. Liquor consumption led to social disquiet in the village.

Pawar felt the need to do something about the situation in his village. Gajanan Pathak, who was then associated with a local NGO Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram, extended his support. Subsequently the forest department (FD) also started helping Pawar in his initiatives. The forest department extended their Joint Forest Management (JFM) scheme to the village in 1998. JFM has subsequently been also extended to other villages in the vicinity. Thus a large contiguous patch of forest is currently under protection by different villages.

Pawar mobilised the villagers and urged them to take action. He pointed out that if deforestation continued, their access to dry wood, fruits and other minor forest produce would get affected. In a village gathering on 23 May 1993, a local informal forest protection committee (FPC) was set up to protect the forest. Initially some villagers were sceptical about this initiative. They were then roped in as important position holders in the FPC. Pawar was elected the chairman of the FPC.

It was decided that the FPC would not have any permanent members. The idea was that each family would have the chance to send a representative to the committee in turn. Thus all the families in the village had a stake in the entire process.

The people of Baripada have initiated a plant diversity register process in October 2004 to monitor the plants found in their forests. They have identified 14 different sites from the forest and initiated vegetation mapping through a 100 sq m quadrant.

Rules and Regulations

The rules and regulations for forest use were announced in the weekly markets and in all neighbouring villages. The rules included:

1. Anyone found destroying or taking anything from the forest would be punished as per the rules framed for regulating human and cattle activity in the area.

Baripada village tank Photo: Milind Thatte

390 Community Conserved Areas in India - a directory

2. Only the inhabitants of the village were eligible for extracting resources from the forest, if at all.

Two elderly people in the village would work as watchmen and report to the FPC. The watchmen would be paid Rs 100 per month and would be changed every year.

3. Each family would pay Rs 3 in cash or 7 kg of grain to generate funds required to pay the watchmen.

4. Any person found removing any plant or animal material without permission would be penalised Rs 151 per headload and Rs 751 if taken out of the forest in any other manner. For cattle grazing in the forest the fine would be Rs 1000.

5. If someone other than the watchmen caught the culprit, then an award of Rs 501 would be given to the person.

6. Farmers whose lands lay next to the protected community forest would have the moral responsibility to report any theft they may encounter.

7. Nobody from within or outside the village would be allowed to enter the forest with a bullock cart for any reason.

Subsequently, there have been some changes in the rules and regulations. For example:

1. The neighbouring villagers are now allowed to extract some resources for social and religious purposes but only if the permission had been sought in advance from Baripada village.

2. For 30 days in a year 50 acres of forestland is given for grazing. The area allocated for grazing is changed every year. Grazing for sheep and goats is not allowed.

3. Villagers are allowed to remove dead/dried wood on social occasions or community gatherings (deaths, weddings, etc). In addition one month during winter (February/March) is a free time again, when only villagers are allowed to remove fuelwood.

The Indian government recognised the effort of the village by awarding it Rs 1,00,000. This amount was used in starting a village level jaggery-making unit. This unit now employs 25 young men from the village.

Inspired by Jan Seva Foundation, environment education camps for local school children are organised in community protected forests. In these programmes the schoolchildren get acquainted with local plants, including medicinal plants, birds and animals.

In 2003, Pawar helped the village women start a fish-farming cooperative using the common village pond. Jan Seva Andolan helped in the process. The women are now pleased as they can give up making liquor. Since alternatives are now available, the women have taken a strong stand on drinking alcohol. Men are now afraid of coming home drunk. Villagers have also undertaken cultivation of a common forest nursery as part of joint watershed development activities.

Impacts of community effortSocial

1. Collective action in the village has now increased appreciably. Marriages are also organised collectively on an auspicious day, thereby reducing expenses.

2. The village has developed a more inclusive method of conflict resolution. One person from each family has to participate in resolution of conflicts, irrespective of the nature of the issue.

3. Jan Seva Foundation and Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram have helped villagers in community-based development activities, like building improved toilets, setting up kitchen gardens that use recycled water, and so on.

Board of the village development committee Photo: Milind Thatte

Maharashtra 391 ca

se stu

die

s - mah

ara

shtra

Ecological

4. The number of thefts from the forest has substantially reduced.

5. Illicit extraction of forest resources by the villagers has completely stopped.

6. Protection and conservation efforts have helped reduce water run-off.

7. The forest department has legitimised the informal village protection group under its Joint Forest Management (JFM) scheme.

8. Species like Tectona grandis, korfad, ghaypaat, among others, have been planted under JFM in the community protected forest.

According to Chaitram Pawar, plant and animal life has increased in the forest, both in terms of number and variety. More importantly, not only has Baripada become self-sufficient in terms of meeting its fuelwood and water needs, it can even supply water to surrounding villages.

Box 1

Community action fosters the ‘we’ spirit in the village

Gajanan Pathak recalls an interesting incident. The forest havaldar (forest guard) had hired some outsiders to collect wood from the forest for him. The villagers came to know about this and questioned the havaldar. Embarrassed, her asked for a transfer and soon moved out of the region. Pathak says, ‘What was interesting about this incident was the fact that the villagers did not shy away from confronting the havaldar, who usually behaved like a king. They could question him because of their own unity and because they felt that he should not go unpunished, as this would set a precedent.’

This article is based on inputs from Gajanan Pathak and Chaitram Pawar and documentation done by Shailesh Shukla and other members of SRISTI team in Honey Bee, Vol. 15 (2) April-June 2004. For more recent information contact Neema Pathak at neema.pb@gmail.com

For more information contact:Chaitram Deochand PawarAt: BaripadaPost ShendwadBlock SakriDistrict Dhule 424306Ph: (c/o Madhav Pawar, Pimpalner, 02561-223930)

Dr. Anand G. Phatak, MDDr. Hedgewar RugnalayaGarkheda, Aurangabad 431 005Ph: 0240-360106 Mob: 9822435505

Check dams made by villagers in the protected forest Photo: Milind Thatte