ccdtl design and prototype measurements m. pasini, abingdon september 28 th , 2005

31
MP - HIPPI General me eting, Abingdon Octob er 28-30, 2005 1 CCDTL design and CCDTL design and prototype measurements prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

Upload: maren

Post on 13-Jan-2016

42 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005. CONTENTS:. CCDTL structure, general concept. Beam Parameters Layout design philosophy Optimized layout Frequency error study CCDTL prototype – Mechanical remarks Low level measurements Conclusions. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

1

CCDTL design and CCDTL design and prototype measurementsprototype measurements

M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28th, 2005

Page 2: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

2

CONTENTS:CONTENTS:

1. CCDTL structure, general concept.

2. Beam Parameters

3. Layout design philosophy

4. Optimized layout

5. Frequency error study

6. CCDTL prototype – Mechanical remarks

7. Low level measurements

8. Conclusions

Page 3: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

3

Cavity structureCavity structure

Page 4: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

4

Why CCDTL?Why CCDTL?

1. In the energy range 40-90 MeV the velocity of the particle is high enough to allow long drifts between focusing elements so that…

2. …we can put the quadrupoles lenses outside the drift tubes with some advantage for the shunt impedance but with great advantage for the installation and the alignment of the quadrupoles…

3. the final structure becomes easier to build and hence cheaper than a DTL.

4. The resonating mode is the /2 which is intrinsically stable.

Page 5: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

5

ZTZT22 Curve Curve

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

3 13 23 33 43 53 63 73 83

Energy (MeV)

ZT

2 (M

Oh

m/m

)

DTL tank1

DTL tank2

DTL tank3

CCDTL

Page 6: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

6

Beam ParametersBeam Parameters

Particle H-

Initial energy 40 MeV

Final energy 90 MeV

Beam Intensity 40 mA (peak)

Duty Cycle (LINAC 4)

0.08 %

Max Duty Cycle 14 %

Frequency 352.2 MHz

Focusing Channel

F0D0

Page 7: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

7

A bit of Definitions…A bit of Definitions…

Single Accelerating CCDTL tank

1 Power coupler / klystron

Module

Page 8: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

8

Layout design philosophyLayout design philosophy

1. Every tank has 3 accelerating gaps (2 drift tubes).

2. The klystron feeds a module that is made out of 3 tanks.

3. The level of the accelerating field from module to module is decreasing in order to have a even power load per klystron.

4. Synchronous phase is -20 deg.

5. Distance between tanks is constant (250 mm). This allow insertion of a quadrupole.

Page 9: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

9

CCDTL optimized LayoutCCDTL optimized Layout

Klystron[#]

Cavity/Kly.[#]

Gradient[MV/m]

Power/Kly.[kW]

Energy[MeV]

Max Kilpatrik[#]

1 3 3.89 800 46.4 1.62

1 3 3.608 800 52.8 1.56

1 3 3.37 800 59.2 1.50

1 3 3.19 800 65.7 1.46

1 3 3.053 800 72.2 1.42

1 3 2.945 800 78.7 1.39

1 3 2.866 800 85.2 1.36

1 3 2.805 800 91.7 1.34

Tot. Klystron[#]

Tot. cavity[#]

Average Grad.[MV/m]

Tot. Power[MW]

Tot. Length.[m]

8 24 3.264 6.4 25.2

Page 10: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

10

Voltage and Phase error Voltage and Phase error studystudy

Results of a simulation of voltage and phase error for the synchronous particle with V/V = 0.5% rms and = 0.5 deg rms

Ref. M. Pasini, CARE/HIPPI Document-2005-006

Page 11: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

11

Coupling coefficientsCoupling coefficients

0 5 10 15 20 250.006

0.0065

0.007

0.0075

0.008

0.0085

0.0098.7 10

3

6.087 103

ki

2

240 i

0 5 10 15 20 250.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

df i

i

9‰

6‰

Co

upl

ing

fact

or k

Cavity number (#)

Page 12: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

12

PSPICE SimulationPSPICE Simulation

Page 13: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

13

Frequency

349MHz 350MHz 351MHz 352MHz 353MHz 354MHz 355MHz 356MHz... V(TX5:1) ... V(R7:2) ... V(TX2:1)

1.0mV

1.0V

1.0KV

MAXr(V(TX2:1), 352e6, 352.4e6)48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62

0

10

20Percent

SEL>>

n samples = 100n divisions = 30

mean = 55.7097sigma = 2.51049

minimum = 50.473610th %ile = 51.8802

median = 56.248790th %ile = 58.4478

maximum = 58.7493

Page 14: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

14

RMSRMS fieldfield errorserrors

0.80%

0.90%

1.00%

1.10%

1.20%

1.30%

1.40%

0.005 0.0055 0.006 0.0065 0.007 0.0075 0.008 0.0085

coupling coefficient (k)

fiel

d e

rro

r (%

)

f = ±50 kHz in all the 5 resonating cells

Page 15: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

15

CCDTL PrototypeCCDTL Prototype

1. A prototype consisting in 2 half accelerating cells and a full coupling cell has been built and assembled.

2. The delivery of the prototype was late by 6 months, mainly due to fabrication problems (steel quality) and copper plating preparation. (Finally successful at the 2 attempt).

Page 16: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

16

1st Half-tank (accelerating)

Coupling cell

2nd Half-tank (accelerating)

Page 17: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

17

Page 18: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

18

Page 19: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

19

Page 20: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

20

Page 21: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

21

Page 22: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

22

Page 23: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

23

Page 24: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

24

Page 25: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

25

Page 26: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

26

Page 27: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

27

Low Level MeasurementsLow Level Measurements

After single cell tuning

mode Freq (MHz) Q

0 350.654 12000

/2 352.233 21000

353.761 13000

K=0.88% coupling coefficient

The measured Q-value is only 61 % with respect to Superfish.

The cavity however was not properly closed and the tuners used were made of aluminum.

Page 28: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

28

Low Level MeasurementsLow Level Measurements

Page 29: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

29

Wave guide coupling Wave guide coupling factor measurementfactor measurement

Distance between coupling iris and short circuit.

-50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500l (mm)

0.00

0.20

0.40

0.60

0.80

1.00

1.20

fit results

max=1.04525l=-1.48206=1344.97

Page 30: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

30

Summary / ConclusionsSummary / Conclusions

1. A new reference layout has been calculated, the section length is now 25m (20% shorter then the previous layout)

2. Validation of the 20 degrees synchronous phase layout has been achieved.

3. Future layout will include a special subsection where the fields in the last 2 modules will be raised up in order to allow a smooth transition in term of longitudinal phase advance. This will imply the addition of one more klystron.

Page 31: CCDTL design and prototype measurements M. Pasini, Abingdon September 28 th , 2005

MP - HIPPI General meeting, Abingdon October 28-30, 2005

31

Summary / ConclusionsSummary / Conclusions

4. Calculation on the frequency error leads to tolerable error in the fields.

5. The prototype is completely assembled. A low level measurement campaign has been performed and results are reported.

6. Final assembly and tuning is foreseen in October and high power test in November.